Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q4
Impact factor
0.9
SJR
0.426
CiteScore
2.4
Categories
Nursing (miscellaneous)
Areas
Nursing
Years of issue
2015-2025
journal names
Ocular Oncology and Pathology
OCUL ONCOL PATHOL
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations

Cleveland Clinic
(32 publications)

Thomas Jefferson University
(23 publications)

Emory University
(18 publications)

Cleveland Clinic
(5 publications)

Harvard University
(5 publications)

Thomas Jefferson University
(4 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2047
Q1

Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Urban Green Innovation in China
Peng W., Su X., Tang Y.
Cities are important carriers of green innovation. The foundation for accelerating China’s ecological civilization construction and fostering regionally coordinated and sustainable development is quantitative analysis of the spatial evolution pattern and influencing factors of urban green innovation, as well as revealing the development differences between regions. This study’s research object includes 284 Chinese cities that are at the prefecture level or above, excluding Xizang, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan of China due to incomplete data. The spatial evolution characteristics of urban green innovation in China between 2005 and 2021 are comprehensively described using the gravity center model and boxplot analysis. The factors that affect urban green innovation are examined using the spatial Durbin model (SDM). The findings indicate that: 1) over the period of the study, the gravity center of urban green innovation in China has always been distributed in the Henan-Anhui border region, showing a migration characteristic of “initially shifting northeast, subsequently southeast”, and the migration speed has gradually increased. 2) Although there are also noticeable disparities in east-west, the north-south gap is the main cause of the shift in China’s urban green innovation gravity center. The primary areas of urban green innovation in China are the cities with green innovation levels higher than the median. 3) The main influencing factor of urban green innovation is the industrial structure level. The effect of the financial development level, the government intervention level, and the openness to the outside world degree on urban green innovation is weakened in turn. The environmental regulation degree is not truly influencing urban green innovation. The impact of various factors on green innovation across cities of different sizes, exhibiting heterogeneity. This study is conducive to broadening the academic community’s comprehension of the spatial evolution characteristics of urban green innovation and offering a theoretical framework for developing policies for the all-encompassing green transformation of social and economic growth.
Q1

Impact of Drought on Farmers’ Livelihood Vulnerability: A Case Study of County-level Units in Western Jilin Province, China
Zhang J., Han Y., Fang Y., Xu Y., Chen C., Liu Z., Wang F., Zhuang L., Huang F.
Agricultural drought, a prolonged disaster with widespread impacts, exerts tremendous pressure on farm household activities, agricultural production, and economic development. The western region of Jilin Province, China, located in a semi-arid zone, where persistents drought exacerbates ecological fragility. With a larger proportion of its population living in rural areas, the life and production activities of households are particularly susceptible to drought-related challenges. This study focuses on the western part of Jilin Province, utilizing remote sensing data to calculate the temperature vegetation dryness index (TVDI) as a soil moisture monitoring indicator for drought assessment. The livelihood vulnerability index (LVI) and the improved LVI-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) index are employed to comprehensively assess the livelihood vulnerability of communes in the region and the impact of drought conditions on farmers’ livelihood vulnerability. The results reveal a spatial trend of increasing drought severity from northeast to southwest, with temporally minor fluctuations observed in drought levels from 2005 to 2022. Livelihood vulnerability results indicate significant spatial and temporal variations, with education, health, food, and water playing key roles. Correlation analysis indicates a strong relationship between TVDI and LVI, highlighting the detrimental impact of drought on farmers’ livelihoods. The study aims to provide a scientific foundation for managing livelihood vulnerability in the western part of Jilin Province and similar arid areas. Additionally, it seeks to offer strategic recommendations for policymakers to mitigate the adverse effects of drought, thereby reducing farmers’ vulnerability and fostering sustainable socio-economic development.
Q1

Digital Economy’s Impact on Carbon Emission Performance: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China
Zhang X., Qiu F., Liu J.
Climate change caused by carbon emissions is a hot topic of concern. Enhancing carbon emission performance (CEP) emerges as a pivotal strategy to curtail carbon emissions, with the digital economy recognized as a crucial instrument for bolstering CEP. Grounded in theoretical analysis, this article takes the Yangtze River Delta region (YRD) as the research object and conducts empirical analysis for the period from 2010 to 2021. The Super Epsilon-Based Measure (EBM) model was employed to assess CEP, while the entropy method was used to quantify the level of the digital economy. Baseline regression models and mediation effect models were constructed to test the research hypotheses. Additionally, the Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) was utilized to analyze the spatial spillover effects of the digital economy. Some conclusions were drawn as follows. Firstly, both the digital economy and CEP exhibit growing trends and demonstrate significant spatial distribution characteristics. Cities with high CEP are increasingly concentrated along the Yangtze River and coastal areas. Meanwhile, the digital economy generally demonstrates a spatial distribution pattern of being higher in the southeast and lower in the northwest. Secondly, the digital economy exerts a notable and consistent positive influence on CEP, but this impact is not primarily achieved through promoting green technology innovation. Instead, the digital economy exhibits a stronger intermediary effect on CEP by facilitating industrial structure upgrading and rationalization. Thirdly, the digital economy significantly enhancing local CEP but having an insignificant impact on neighboring cities’ CEP. To address these findings, cities ought to invest in digital infrastructure, incentivize digital innovation through policy and financial backing, and harness advanced technologies like 5G and blockchain to promote low-carbon, intelligent production and lifestyles, while enhancing industrial structure and regional cooperation to foster a low-carbon digital economy network.
Q1

Quantifying and Mapping the Effects of Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Competitiveness: A Case Study in Shandong Province, China
Zhong J., Sun Q., Qi W., Yu X.
Quantifying and mapping how ecosystem services impact agricultural competitiveness is crucial for attaining the Sustainable Development Goals of United Nations. However, few study quantified agricultural competitiveness and mapped the effects of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness using multiple models. In this study, multi-source data from 2000 to 2020 were utilized to establish the indicator system of agricultural competitiveness; five ecosystem services were quantified using computation models; Geographic Information System (GIS) spatial analysis was used to explore the spatial patterns of agricultural competitiveness and ecosystem services; geographic detector models were applied to investigate the effects and driving mechanisms of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness. Shandong Province of China was selected as the case study area. The results demonstrated that: 1) there was a significant increase in agricultural competitiveness during the study period, with high levels observed mainly in the east region of the study area. 2) The spatial distribution patterns of ecosystem services and agricultural competitiveness primarily exhibited High-High and Low-Low Cluster types. 3) Habitat quality emerged as the main driving factor of agricultural competitiveness in 2000 and 2020, while water yield played a substantial role in 2010. 4) The coupling of two ecosystem services exerted a greater effect on agricultural competitiveness compared to individual ecosystem service. The innovations of this study are constructing an indicator system to quantify agricultural competitiveness, and exploring the effects of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness. This study proposed an indicator system to quantify agricultural competitiveness, which can be applied in other regions, and explored the effects of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness. The findings of this study can serve as valuable insights for policymakers to formulate tailored agricultural development policies that take into account the synergistic effects of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness.
Q1

Intercity Mobility and Coupled Landscapes of Multidimensional Regionalization in Western China
Jiang F., Li T., Li J.
Intercity mobility lays the foundation for capital flow, information flow, and knowledge flow, etc., and is important for promoting regional integration. Although many scholars have studied intercity mobility in extensive well-developed urban agglomerations, few studies have examined the characteristics of intercity mobility at the county level and its impact on regionalization in western China. This study takes the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration (GPUA) as a case to study the geographical law of intercity mobility and then explore its impact on regionalization. The results obtained show that intercity mobility network exhibits a hub and spoke patterns focusing on major municipal districts at the county level. We also found a corridor effect that counties with higher travel volumes are mostly located along the trunk high speed railway (HSR) lines. Unlike previous studies, the distribution of intercity mobility is more concentrated than that of population and exhibits a super-linear behavior rule. There are the differences in gravity law for overall trips, weekday trips, weekend trips, and holiday trips. With the decrease of travel duration, the effect of attraction of destination is weakening, but the influence of distance decay is increasing. Finally, the spatial organization is still administrative-centric and is dominated by intraprefecture and intra-provincial development. Moreover, the coupled degree between network-based regionalization and attribute-based regionalization shows a decreasing trend from administrative via cultural to physical factors. These findings enrich the research on the intercity mobility and the regionalization in inland developing urban agglomerations.
Q1

Effects of Lignite Humic Acid and Lignite Humic Acid-based Combined Amendment on Soil Quality in Saline-sodic Farmlands in the West Liaohe Plain, China
Nie Z., Zhang L., Zhang T., Guo L., Zhou J., An F., Ma H., Wang Z., Yang F.
Water scarcity and soil salinization pose significant challenges to agriculture in the West Liaohe Plain, eastern Inner Mongolia, China. Shallow-buried drip irrigation can improve soil water use efficiency to alleviate water shortage in agriculture and the application of lignite humic acid reduces the adverse effects of soil salinization. However, further research is needed to investigate the effects of different application rates of lignite humic acid and humic acid-based combined amendment on soil physicochemical properties, nutrient contents, and crop yield in saline-sodic farmlands under shallow-buried drip irrigation. A two-year field experiment was conducted with control without any amendment (CK), three treatments amended with 3 t/ha (H1), 6 t/ha (H2), and 12 t/ha (H3) lignite humic acid, and three application rates with 15 t/ha (T1), 22.5 t/ha (T2), and 30 t/ha (T3) lignite humic acid-based combined amendment in 2021 and 2022. The results showed that H3 reduced soil bulk density, pH, electrical conductivity, and total alkalinity, while increasing the contents of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, and available potassium in the two-year experiment. Moreover, the maize yield in H3 increased by an average of 35.5%. T2 decreased soil bulk density, pH, total alkalinity, and increased maize yield by 16.2%, compared to the first year. These results suggest that T2 consistently improved both soil quality and crop yield. Correlation analyses showed that lignite humic acid and its complexes promote maize growth and increase yield by increasing soil organic matter and total nitrogen while reducing soil salinity and total alkalinity. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the field data and the results of the comprehensive evaluation of soil quality, it was determined that the appropriate improvement measures for saline-sodic farmlands under shallow-buried drip irrigation are the application of 12 t/ha of lignite humic acid and 22.5 t/ha of lignite humic acid-based combined amendment. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of lignite humic acid and its combined amendment in mitigating the constraints of saline-sodic farmlands and enhancing crop yields, providing a sustainable solution for improving saline-sodic farmlands in the West Liaohe Plain.
Q1

Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services Values in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China in the Context of National Water Network Project Construction
Liu L., Zheng L., Wang Y., Liu C., Zhang B., Bi Y.
Investigating the ecological impact of land use change in the context of the construction of national water network project is crucial, as it is imperative for achieving the sustainable development goals of the national water network and guaranteeing regional ecological stability. Using the Danjiangkou Reservoir Area (DRA), China as the study area, this paper first examined the spatiotemporal dynamics of natural landscape patterns and ecosystem service values (ESV) in the DRA from 2000 to 2018 and then investigated the spatial clustering characteristics of the ESV using spatial statistical analysis tools. Finally, the patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model was used to simulate the natural landscape and future changes in the ESV of the DRA from 2018 to 2028 under four different development scenarios: business as usual (BAU), economic development (ED), ecological protection (EP), and shoreline protection (SP). The results show that: during 2000–2018, the construction of water facilities had a significant impact on regional land use/land cover (LULC) change, with a 24 830 ha increase in watershed area. ESV exhibited an increasing trend, with a significant and growing spatial clustering effect. The transformation of farmland to water bodies led to accelerated ESV growth, while the transformation of forest land to farmland led to a decrease in the ESV. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) had the strongest effect on the ESV. ESV exhibited a continuous increase from 2018 to 2028 under all the simulation scenarios. The EP scenario had the greatest increase in ESV, while the ED scenario had the smallest increase. The findings suggest that projected land use patterns under different scenarios have varied impacts on ecosystem services (ESs) and that the management and planning of the DRA should balance social, economic, ecological, and security benefits.nomic, ecological, and security benefits.
Q1

Water Quality, Influential Factors, and Management Strategies from 2016 to 2020 in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
Lin L., Guo C., Chen Y., He L., Yan L., Fang D., Ma G., Zhang F., Li M.
The Yangtze River economic belt (YREB), China is important to the Chinese economy and for supporting sustainable development. Clarifying the relationship between water quality indices and socioeconomic indicators could help improve aquatic environment management in the YREB and our understanding of the causes and effects of water quality variations in other large river basins. In this study, river water quality, factors affecting water quality, and management strategies, and correlations between water quality indices and socioeconomic indicators in the YREB during the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016–2020) were assessed. The single-factor evaluation method, constant price for GDP, and correlation analyses were adopted. The results showed that: 1) water quality in the YREB improved during the 13th Five-Year Plan period. The number of aquatic environment sections meeting Grade I–III water quality standards increased by 13.1% and the number below Grade V decreased by 2.9%. 2) The values of 12 indicators in the YREB exceeded relevant standards. The indicators with highest concentreation were the total phosphorus, chemical oxygen demand, ammonia nitrogen, and permanganate index, which were relatively high in downstream regions in Anhui Province, Jiangsu Province, and Shanghai Municipality. 3) Ammonia nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand, and total phosphorus emissions per unit area and water extraction per unit area are relatively high in the three downstream regions mentioned above. 4) Increased domestic sewage discharges have increased total wastewater discharges in the YREB. 5) River water quality in the YREB strongly correlated with population, economic, and water resource indices and less strongly correlated with government investment, agriculture, meteorology, energy, and forestry indices. This confirmed the need to decrease wastewater discharges and non-point-source pollutant emissions. The aquatic environment could be improved by taking reasonable measures to control population growth, adjusting the industrial structure to accelerate industrial transformation and increase the proportion of tertiary industries, and investing in technological innovations to protect the environment.
Q1

Impact of Climate Change on Crop-cropland Coupling Relationship: A Case Study of the Loess Plateau in China
Li S., Liu Y., Shao Y., Wang X.
Climate change brings new challenges to the sustainable development of agriculture in the new era. Accurately grasping the patterns of climate change impacts on agricultural systems is crucial for ensuring agricultural sustainability and food security. Taking the Loess Plateau (LP), China as an example, this study used a coupling coordination degree model and spatial autocorrelation analysis to portray the spatial and temporal features of crop-cropland coupling relationship from 2000 to 2020 and explored the impact law of climate change through geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR). The results were as follows: 1) the crop-cropland coupling coordination degree of the LP showed a gradual upward trend from 2000 to 2020, forming a spatial pattern with lower values in the central region and higher values in the surrounding areas. 2) There was a positive correlation in the spatial distribution of crop-cropland coupling coordination degree in the LP from 2000 to 2020, and the high value-low value (H-L) and low value-low value (L-L) agglomerations continued to expand eastward, while the spatial and temporal evolution of the high value-high value (H-H) and low value-high value (L-H) agglomerations was not obvious. 3) The impacts of climatic elements on crop-cropland coupling coordination degree in the LP showed strong heterogeneity in time scales. The inhibitory impacts of summer days (SU) and frost days (FD) accounted for a higher proportion, while the annual average temperature (TEM) had both promoting and inhibiting impacts. The impacts proportion and intensity of extreme heavy precipitation day (R25), continuous drought days (CDD), and annual precipitation (PRE) all experienced significant changes. 4) In space, the impacts of SU and FD on the crop-cropland coupling coordination degree varied with latitude and altitude. The adaptability of the LP to R25 gradually strengthened, and the extensions of CDD and increase of PRE led to the increasing inhibition beyond the eastern region of LP, and TEM showed a promoting impact in the Fenwei Plain. As an important grain-producing area in China, the LP should actively deal with the impacts of climate change on the crop-cropland coupling relationship, vigorously safeguard food security, and promote sustainable agricultural development.
Q1

Spatial Patterns and Controlling Factors of Soil Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen in the Three River Headwaters Region, China
Cui Q., Li Z., Feng Q., Zhang B., Zhao Y.
The alpine ecosystem has great potential for carbon sequestration. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) are highly sensitive to climate change, and their dynamics are crucial to revealing the effect of climate change on the structure, function, and services of the ecosystem. However, the spatial distribution and controlling factors of SOC and TN across various soil layers and vegetation types within this unique ecosystem remain inadequately understood. In this study, 256 soil samples in 89 sites were collected from the Three River Headwaters Region (TRHR) in China to investigate SOC and TN and to explore the primary factors affecting their distribution, including soil, vegetation, climate, and geography factors. The results show that SOC and TN contents in 0–20, 20–40, 40–60, and 60–80 cm soil layers are 24.40, 18.03, 14.04, 12.40 g/kg and 2.46, 1.90, 1.51, 1.17 g/kg, respectively; with higher concentrations observed in the southeastern region compared to the northwest of the TRHR. One-way analysis of variance reveals that SOC and TN levels are elevated in the alpine meadow and the alpine shrub relative to the alpine steppe in the 0–60 cm soil layers. The structural equation model explores that soil water content is the main controlling factor affecting the variation of SOC and TN. Moreover, the geography, climate, and vegetation factors notably indirectly affect SOC and TN through soil factors. Therefore, it can effectively improve soil water and nutrient conditions through vegetation restoration, soil improvement, and grazing management, and the change of SOC and TN can be fully understood by establishing monitoring networks to better protect soil carbon and nitrogen.
Q1

Changes in River Cross-section Morphology and Response to Streamflow and Sediment Processes in Middle Reaches of Yellow River, China
Wen Y., Li P., Li M., Ma C., Gao P., Mu X., Zhao G.
Changes in river cross-section morphology have decisive influences on the flood discharge and sand transport capacity of rivers; thus, these changes strongly reflect the vitality of a river. In this paper, based on the river cross-section and water and sediment data of two different periods (1974–1987 and 2007–2021), the trend analysis, change-point analysis and sediment rating curve method were used to analyze the change process of river cross-section morphology and its response to streamflow and sediment changes in the main river stream of the Yellow River at the Longmen hydrological station. From 1974 to 1987 (except in 1977), the riverbed experienced siltation, and the riverbed elevation rose. Conversely, from 2007 to 2021, the riverbed experienced scouring, and the riverbed elevation gradually decreased. The cross-section shape changed from rectangular to U-shaped (deeper on the right side) at the Longmen cross-section. The changes in streamflow and sediment processes significantly impacted the evolution of river cross-section. Streamflow (P < 0.05), sediment discharge (P < 0.01), and the sediment load coefficients (P < 0.01) decreased significantly. The relationship between the water depth and sediment load coefficients followed a power function. The decreasing trend in sediment discharge was significantly stronger than that in streamflow. Suspended sediment particles tended to become finer. The sediment rating curve indicates that the sediment supply from upstream decreased while the erosive power in the river channel increased, leading to a gradual decline in riverbed elevation at the Longmen cross-section from 2007 to 2021. These findings help us better understand the impacts of ecological restoration on changes in river streamflow and sediment during river evolution.
Q1

Spatiotemporal Variation and Influencing Factors of Atmospheric CO2 Concentration in China
Zhu W., Zhang H., Zhang X., Guo H., Liu Y.
Rapid increases in Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels could trigger unpredictable climate change. The assessment of spatiotemporal variation and influencing factors of CO2 concentration are helpful in understanding the source/sink balance and supporting the formulation of climate policy. In this study, Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) data were used to explore the variability of CO2 concentrations in China from 2009 to 2020. Meteorological parameters, vegetation cover, and anthropogenic activities were combined to explain the increase in CO2 concentration, using pixel-based correlations and Covariance Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM) analysis. The results showed that the influence of vertical CO2 transport diminished with altitude, with a distinct inter-annual increase in CO2 concentrations at 17 vertical levels. Spatially, the highest values were observed in East China, whereas the lowest were observed in Northwest China. There were significant seasonal variations in CO2 concentration, with maximum and minimum values in spring (April) and summer (August), respectively. According to the pixel-based correlation analysis, the near-surface CO2 concentration was positively correlated with population (r = 0.99, P < 0.001), Leaf Area Index (LAI, r = 0.95, P < 0.001), emissions (r = 0.91, P < 0.001), temperature (r = 0.60, P < 0.05), precipitation (r = 0.34, P > 0.05), soil water (r = 0.29, P > 0.05), nightlight (r = 0.28, P < 0.05); and negatively correlated with wind speed (r = −0.58, P < 0.05). CB-SEM analysis revealed that LAI was the most important controlling factor explaining CO2 concentration variation (total effect of 0.66), followed by emissions (0.58), temperature (0.45), precipitation (0.30), wind speed (−0.28), and soil water (−0.07). The model explained 93% of the increase in CO2 concentration. Our results provide crucial information on the patterns of CO2 concentrations and their driving mechanisms, which are particularly significant in the context of climate change.
Q1

Geographical Engineering and Its Role in Promoting Integrated Geography Research
Liu Y., Su S., Li X.
Throughout the contemporary Chinese history of geography, geographical engineering has consistently played a pivotal role as a fundamental scientific activity. It possesses its distinct ontological basis and value orientation, rendering it inseparable from being merely a derivative of geographical science or technology. This paper defines geographical engineering and introduces its development history through the lens of Chinese geographical engineering praxises. Furthermore, it is highlighted the logical and functional consistency between the theory of human-earth system and the praxis of geographical engineering. Six modern cases of geographical engineering projects are presented in detail to demonstrate the points and characteristics of different types of modern geographical engineering. Geographical engineering serves as an engine for promoting integrated geography research, and in response to the challenge posed by fragmented geographies, this paper advocates for an urgent revitalization of geographical engineering. The feasibility of revitalizing geographical engineering is guaranteed because it aligns with China’s national strategies.
Q1

Modeling of Spring Phenology of Boreal Forest by Coupling Machine Learning and Diurnal Temperature Indicators
Deng G., Zhang H., Hong Y., Guo X., Yi Z., Biniyaz E.
The roles of diurnal temperature in providing heat accumulation and chilling requirements for vegetation spring phenology differ. Although previous studies have established a stronger correlation between leaf onset and diurnal temperature than between leaf onset and average temperature, current research on modeling spring phenology based on diurnal temperature indicators remains limited. In this study, we confirmed the start of the growing season (SOS) sensitivity to diurnal temperature and average temperature in boreal forest. The estimation of SOS was carried out by employing K-Nearest Neighbor Regression (KNR-TDN) model, Random Forest Regression (RFR-TDN) model, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB-TDN) model and Light Gradient Boosting Machine model (LightGBM-TDN) driven by diurnal temperature indicators during 1982–2015, and the SOS was projected from 2015 to 2100 based on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) climate scenario datasets. The sensitivity of boreal forest SOS to daytime temperature is greater than that to average temperature and nighttime temperature. The LightGBM-TDN model perform best across all vegetation types, exhibiting the lowest RMSE and bias compared to the KNR-TDN model, RFR-TDN model and XGB-TDN model. By incorporating diurnal temperature indicators instead of relying only on average temperature indicators to simulate spring phenology, an improvement in the accuracy of the model is achieved. Furthermore, the preseason accumulated daytime temperature, daytime temperature and snow cover end date emerged as significant drivers of the SOS simulation in the study area. The simulation results based on LightGBM-TDN model exhibit a trend of advancing SOS followed by stabilization under future climate scenarios. This study underscores the potential of diurnal temperature indicators as a viable alternative to average temperature indicators in driving spring phenology models, offering a promising new method for simulating spring phenology.
Q1

Light Use Efficiency Model Based on Chlorophyll Content Better Captures Seasonal Gross Primary Production Dynamics of Deciduous Broadleaf Forests
Yang R., Liu R., Liu Y., Chen J., Xu M., He J.
Gross primary production (GPP) is a crucial indicator representing the absorption of atmospheric CO2 by vegetation. At present, the estimation of GPP by remote sensing is mainly based on leaf-related vegetation indexes and leaf-related biophysical parameter leaf area index (LAI), which are not completely synchronized in seasonality with GPP. In this study, we proposed chlorophyll content-based light use efficiency model (CC-LUE) to improve GPP estimates, as chlorophyll is the direct site of photosynthesis, and only the light absorbed by chlorophyll is used in the photosynthetic process. The CC-LUE model is constructed by establishing a linear correlation between satellite-derived canopy chlorophyll content (Chlcanopy) and FPAR. This method was calibrated and validated utilizing 7-d averaged in-situ GPP data from 14 eddy covariance flux towers covering deciduous broadleaf forest ecosystems across five different climate zones. Results showed a relatively robust seasonal consistency between Chlcanopy with GPP in deciduous broadleaf forests under different climatic conditions. The CC-LUE model explained 88% of the in-situ GPP seasonality for all validation site-year and 56.0% of in-situ GPP variations through the growing season, outperforming the three widely used LUE models (MODIS-GPP algorithm, Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM), and the eddy covariance-light use efficiency model (EC-LUE)). Additionally, the CC-LUE model (RMSE = 0.50 g C/(m2·d)) significantly improved the underestimation of GPP during the growing season in semi-arid region, remarkably decreasing the root mean square error of averaged growing season GPP simulation and in-situ GPP by 75.4%, 73.4%, and 37.5%, compared with MOD17 (RMSE = 2.03 g C/(m2·d)), VPM (RMSE = 1.88 g C/(m2·d)), and EC-LUE (RMSE = 0.80 g C/(m2·d)) model. The chlorophyll-based method proved superior in capturing the seasonal variations of GPP in forest ecosystems, thereby providing the possibility of a more precise depiction of forest seasonal carbon uptake.
Top-100
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
Cancers
155 citations, 4.63%
|
|
Ocular Oncology and Pathology
143 citations, 4.28%
|
|
Eye
76 citations, 2.27%
|
|
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
57 citations, 1.7%
|
|
American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports
53 citations, 1.58%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
46 citations, 1.38%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
43 citations, 1.29%
|
|
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
43 citations, 1.29%
|
|
Cureus
41 citations, 1.23%
|
|
American Journal of Ophthalmology
39 citations, 1.17%
|
|
BMC Ophthalmology
37 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Survey of Ophthalmology
37 citations, 1.11%
|
|
British Journal of Ophthalmology
37 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Ophthalmology
34 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
34 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
33 citations, 0.99%
|
|
European Journal of Ophthalmology
31 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation
30 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
29 citations, 0.87%
|
|
JAMA Ophthalmology
29 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde
25 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Scientific Reports
25 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Orbit
25 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie
24 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Retina
23 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology
22 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Retinal Cases and Brief Reports
22 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology
22 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology - Case Reports
22 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Pediatric Blood and Cancer
21 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Ophthalmology Retina
21 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Seminars in Ophthalmology
21 citations, 0.63%
|
|
International Ophthalmology
21 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
20 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
19 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Advances in Ophthalmology and Optometry
18 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Experimental Eye Research
18 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Acta Ophthalmologica
18 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Brachytherapy
18 citations, 0.54%
|
|
International Ophthalmology Clinics
16 citations, 0.48%
|
|
BMJ Case Reports
16 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
15 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
15 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
14 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Annals of Eye Science
14 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina
13 citations, 0.39%
|
|
American Journal of Dermatopathology
13 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
13 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Ophthalmologe
13 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
12 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of AAPOS
12 citations, 0.36%
|
|
BMC Cancer
12 citations, 0.36%
|
|
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
12 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Current Oncology
11 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Ophthalmic Genetics
11 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Current Ophthalmology Reports
11 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Biomedicines
11 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Clinical Ophthalmology
10 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Vestnik Oftalmologii
10 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Reactions Weekly
10 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
9 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
9 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Oftalmologiya
9 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Ophthalmology Science
9 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Pigment Cell and Melanoma Research
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Advances in Radiation Oncology
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Medical Physics
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Ophthalmology
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Melanoma Research
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Radiotherapy and Oncology
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Ocular Surface
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Case Reports in Ophthalmology
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Diagnostics
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Die Ophthalmologie
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Ophthalmology and Therapy
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
OncoTargets and Therapy
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Genes
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
British Journal of Cancer
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Medicina
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Clinical Case Reports
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Heliyon
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Russian Ophthalmological Journal (Rossiiskii Oftal'mologicheskii Zhurnal)
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Molecular Biology
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Diagnostic Pathology
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Cornea
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Dermatology
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Cancer Medicine
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Physica Medica
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
PLoS ONE
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Glaucoma
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Molekulyarnaya Biologiya
5 citations, 0.15%
|
|
World Journal of Clinical Cases
5 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Diagnostic Cytopathology
5 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
5 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Seminars in Cancer Biology
5 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Elsevier
692 citations, 20.69%
|
|
Springer Nature
516 citations, 15.43%
|
|
MDPI
301 citations, 9%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
271 citations, 8.1%
|
|
S. Karger AG
161 citations, 4.81%
|
|
Wiley
159 citations, 4.75%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
149 citations, 4.45%
|
|
SAGE
76 citations, 2.27%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
74 citations, 2.21%
|
|
BMJ
62 citations, 1.85%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
49 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Medknow
39 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
34 citations, 1.02%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
32 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
28 citations, 0.84%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
19 citations, 0.57%
|
|
SLACK
18 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Oxford University Press
15 citations, 0.45%
|
|
15 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
13 citations, 0.39%
|
|
King Saud University
12 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
12 citations, 0.36%
|
|
PE Polunina Elizareta Gennadievna
11 citations, 0.33%
|
|
IntechOpen
10 citations, 0.3%
|
|
IOP Publishing
9 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
9 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Real Time, Ltd.
9 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
9 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
8 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
7 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
6 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Impact Journals
5 citations, 0.15%
|
|
5 citations, 0.15%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
5 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
4 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
4 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
4 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI)
4 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Society of Neuoradiology
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
F1000 Research
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Physiological Society
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AIP Publishing
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Silicea - Poligraf, LLC
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Publishing House ABV Press
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Publishing House Belorusskaya Nauka
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AOSIS
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hans Publishers
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IOS Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Begell House
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Higher Education Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Nuclear Medicine
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Academy of Medicine Singapore
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
International Research and Cooperation Association for Bio & Socio-Sciences Advancement (IRCA-BSSA)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Vydavatelstvi Karolinum
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Iranian Society of Ophthalmology
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Translational Oncology
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Onkoloski Institut Ljubljana/Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Anatomical Society of India
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
OOO Grafika
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
IGI Global
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Society of Pathologists and The Korean Society for Cytopathology
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgeons/Korean Society of Endovascular Surgery
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Society on Surgery for Cerebral Stroke
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
World Federation of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (WFITN)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
XMLink
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (68 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
32 publications, 5.57%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
23 publications, 4.01%
|
|
Emory University
18 publications, 3.14%
|
|
Harvard University
13 publications, 2.26%
|
|
University of Southern California
11 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
11 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
11 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
10 publications, 1.74%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
10 publications, 1.74%
|
|
University of Liverpool
7 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Cornell University
7 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of South Florida
7 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
7 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Essen University Hospital
7 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Technical University of Dortmund
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Institut Curie
6 publications, 1.05%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi
5 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Yale University
5 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Sydney
5 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Duke University
5 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
5 publications, 0.87%
|
|
McGill University Health Centre
5 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
5 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
5 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
California Pacific Medical Center
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Sheffield
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Alberta
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Miami
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
4 publications, 0.7%
|
|
L. V. Prasad Eye Institute
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Lausanne
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Stanford University
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Tokyo Medical University
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
McGill University
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Calgary
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Barts Health NHS Trust
3 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Hacettepe University
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Farabi Eye Hospital
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Sheba Medical Center
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of New South Wales
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Haukeland University Hospital
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Northwestern University
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Washington
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Tufts Medical Center
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Cologne
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Oakland University
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Federal University of Bahia
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Kansai Medical University
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Ottawa
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Wake Forest University
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
National Eye Institute
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
International Agency for Research on Cancer
2 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Hail
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Hyderabad
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Tata Memorial Centre
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Jilin University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Malaya
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Lady Hardinge Medical College
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Geneva University Hospitals
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
American University of Beirut Medical Center
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Harvard University
5 publications, 2.31%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
5 publications, 2.31%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
4 publications, 1.85%
|
|
McGill University Health Centre
3 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
3 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
3 publications, 1.39%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Cornell University
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Duke University
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of South Florida
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
McGill University
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Essen University Hospital
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Emory University
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
2 publications, 0.93%
|
|
L. V. Prasad Eye Institute
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Antwerp University Hospital
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Nottingham
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Haukeland University Hospital
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Siena
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Technical University of Dortmund
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Stanford University
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Tokyo Medical University
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Mahidol University
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Ramathibodi Hospital
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Northwestern University
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Michigan
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Minnesota
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Kansai Medical University
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Coimbra
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Calgary
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Alberta
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Ottawa
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Miami
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Rochester Medical Center
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
National Eye Institute
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Nebraska Medical Center
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
New York Medical College
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
International Agency for Research on Cancer
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Barts Health NHS Trust
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
1 publication, 0.46%
|
|
Show all (35 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
|
|
USA
|
USA, 200, 34.84%
USA
200 publications, 34.84%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 45, 7.84%
United Kingdom
45 publications, 7.84%
|
India
|
India, 24, 4.18%
India
24 publications, 4.18%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 17, 2.96%
Germany
17 publications, 2.96%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 16, 2.79%
Canada
16 publications, 2.79%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 11, 1.92%
Netherlands
11 publications, 1.92%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 9, 1.57%
Australia
9 publications, 1.57%
|
France
|
France, 8, 1.39%
France
8 publications, 1.39%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 7, 1.22%
Brazil
7 publications, 1.22%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 1.05%
Switzerland
6 publications, 1.05%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 0.87%
Japan
5 publications, 0.87%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 0.7%
Iran
4 publications, 0.7%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 4, 0.7%
Italy
4 publications, 0.7%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.7%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.7%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.52%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.52%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 3, 0.52%
Bangladesh
3 publications, 0.52%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.52%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.52%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.52%
Israel
3 publications, 0.52%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 3, 0.52%
Spain
3 publications, 0.52%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 0.52%
Norway
3 publications, 0.52%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 0.52%
Sweden
3 publications, 0.52%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.35%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.35%
Greece
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.35%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.35%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.35%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.35%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.35%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.35%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.17%
China
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.17%
Austria
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.17%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.17%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 1, 0.17%
Dominican Republic
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.17%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.17%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.17%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.17%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.17%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.17%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.17%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.17%
UAE
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.17%
Poland
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.17%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.17%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.17%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.17%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.17%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Show all (15 more) | |
50
100
150
200
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
USA
|
USA, 32, 14.81%
USA
32 publications, 14.81%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 13, 6.02%
United Kingdom
13 publications, 6.02%
|
India
|
India, 6, 2.78%
India
6 publications, 2.78%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 6, 2.78%
Canada
6 publications, 2.78%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 1.39%
Germany
3 publications, 1.39%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.93%
Italy
2 publications, 0.93%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.93%
Japan
2 publications, 0.93%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.46%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.46%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.46%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.46%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.46%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.46%
Spain
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.46%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.46%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.46%
Norway
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.46%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.46%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.46%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.46%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.46%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.46%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.46%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
4 profile journal articles
Quhill Hibba
21 publications,
694 citations
h-index: 6