Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
Impact factor
2.2
SJR
0.755
CiteScore
4.0
Categories
Business and International Management
Industrial Relations
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Years of issue
1959-2025
journal names
Journal of Industrial Relations
J IND RELAT
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Industrial Relations
(2246 citations)

Economic and Labour Relations Review
(432 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Sydney
(478 publications)

University of Melbourne
(175 publications)

Monash University
(152 publications)

University of Sydney
(28 publications)

University of New South Wales
(11 publications)

University of Technology Sydney
(10 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 15242

A Pilot Study of Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy after Autologous Transplantation in Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
Shea L., Watkins M.P., Wan F., Cashen A.F., Wagner-Johnston N.D., Jacoby M.A., Abboud C.N., Dipersio J.F., Hurd D.D., Jaglowski S.M., Bartlett N.L., Fehniger T.A.
For patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), salvage chemotherapy followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the standard of care. Even with this aggressive treatment strategy, 5-year progression-free survival is ≤50%, and there remains interest in maintenance strategies to improve long-term disease-free survival. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with demonstrated activity in multiple subtypes of lymphoma including cHL, and has also been shown to improve both progression-free and overall survival as maintenance therapy after ASCT in multiple myeloma. This multicenter study evaluated maintenance lenalidomide after ASCT for patients with cHL. Patients were enrolled 60 to 90 days post-transplant and received oral lenalidomide on days 1 to 28 of 28-day cycles for a maximum of 18 cycles. Lenalidomide was started at 15 mg daily and increased to maximum of 25 mg daily if tolerated. The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of this regimen, with a goal

Early Mixed Lymphoid Donor/Host Chimerism is Associated with Improved Transplant Outcome in Patients with Primary or Secondary Myelofibrosis
Deeg H.J., Salit R.B., Monahan T., Schoch G., McFarland C., Scott B.L., Storer B.E.
We investigated risk factors for the development of mixed chimerism in 131 patients who underwent transplantation for myelofibrosis and determined the impact of lymphoid (CD3+) and myeloid (CD33+) chimerism on transplant outcome. Disease risk included DIPSS plus categories low to high. The median patient age was 58 years. Patients were conditioned with high-intensity (myeloablative) or low/reduced-intensity (nonmyeloablative) regimens and received a transplant from a related or unrelated donor. Mixed CD3+ chimerism was observed earlier after HCT, whereas CD33+ chimerism occurred later. Mixed chimerism was more frequent with low-intensity regimens than with high- intensity regimens. Mixed CD3+ chimerism did not lead to graft failure and was associated with a reduced incidence of acute GVHD and improved overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival, whereas mixed CD33+ chimerism was associated with an increased incidence of relapse and reduced OS and relapse-free survival, independent of the CD34+ cell dose transplanted. Thus, mixed CD3+ chimerism in patients with myelofibrosis had a favorable impact on transplantation outcome and does not require therapeutic interventions.

Incidence and Outcome of Late Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis
Atagunduz I.K., Christopeit M., Ayuk F., Zeck G., Wolschke C., Kröger N.
In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively evaluated the files of 227 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent transplantation between 1994 and 2015 for relapse later than 5 years after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). A total of 94 patients who were alive and in remission at 5 years were identified with follow-up of at least 5 years (median, 9.15 years) after SCT. Thirteen patients (14%) experienced late molecular (n = 6) or hematologic (n = 7) relapse at a median of 7.1 years while 81 patients did not experience relapse. Relapse patients received either donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) (n = 7) and/or second transplantation (n = 4). Of those, 72.7% achieved again full donor cell chimerism and molecular remission, and after a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year overall survival rates for patients with or without relapse were 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77% to 100%) and 98.8% (95% CI, 96% to 100%), respectively (P = .13). We conclude that late relapse occurs in about 14% of the patients and the majority can be successfully salvaged with DLI and/or second allograft. All patients with molecular relapse are alive and support the long-time molecular monitoring in myelofibrosis patients after allogeneic SCT.

Individuals, Boundaries, and Graft-versus-Host Disease
Deeg H.J.
Hematopoietic cell transplantation generates new individuals, transplant chimeras, composed of 2 genetic partners—the patient and donor-derived cells—no longer restricted by their original genomes. Interactions of donor-derived and recipient cells occur prominently at the boundary of the recipient with a third partner, the microbiome, in particular skin and intestinal tract, leading to disruption of microbiome homeostasis. These interactions of donor and patient cells at the boundary set the stage for the development of graft-versus-host disease, an expression of the defense of individuality by recipient and donor. Establishment of tolerance and return of homeostasis at the boundary will allow for the survival of the new integrated, physiologic individual.

Outcomes with Autologous or Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Plasma Cell Leukemia in the Era of Novel Agents
Lemieux C., Johnston L.J., Lowsky R., Muffly L.S., Craig J.K., Shiraz P., Rezvani A., Frank M.J., Weng W., Meyer E., Shizuru J., Arai S., Negrin R., Miklos D.B., Sidana S.
Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and very aggressive plasma cell disorder. The optimal treatment approach, including whether to pursue an autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) stem cell transplantation (SCT) is not clear, given the lack of clinical trial-based evidence. This single-center retrospective study describes the outcomes of 16 patients with PCL (n = 14 with primary PCL) who underwent either autoSCT (n = 9) or alloSCT (n = 7) for PCL in the era of novel agents, between 2007 and 2019. The median age of the cohort was 58 years. High-risk cytogenetics were found in 50% of the patients. All patients received a proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug-based regimen before transplantation. At the time of transplantation, 10 patients (62%) obtained at least a very good partial response (VGPR). The response after autoSCT (3 months) was at least a VGPR in 6 patients (67%; complete response [CR] in 5). All patients undergoing alloSCT achieved a CR at 3 months. Maintenance therapy was provided to 5 patients (56%) after autoSCT. The median progression-free survival after transplantation was 6 months in the autoSCT group, compared with 18 months in the alloSCT group (P = .09), and median overall survival (OS) after transplantation in the 2 groups was 19 months and 40 months, respectively (P = .41). The median OS from diagnosis was 27 months and 49 months, respectively (P = .50). Of the 11 deaths, 10 patients (91%) died of relapsed disease. AlloSCT was not observed to offer any significant survival advantage over autoSCT in PCL, in agreement with recent reports, and relapse remains the primary cause of death in these patients.

Guidelines for Cord Blood Unit Selection
Politikos I., Davis E., Nhaissi M., Wagner J.E., Brunstein C.G., Cohen S., Shpall E.J., Milano F., Scaradavou A., Barker J.N.
Optimal cord blood (CB) unit selection is critical to maximize the likelihood of successful engraftment and survival after CB transplantation (CBT). However, unit selection can be complex because multiple characteristics must be considered including unit cell dose, donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, and unit quality. This review provides evidence-based and experience-based comprehensive guidelines for CB unit selection. Topics addressed include the use of both the TNC and the CD34+ cell dose, as well as the CD34+ cell to TNC content ratio to evaluate unit progenitor cell content and engraftment potential, the acceptable TNC and CD34+ cell dose criteria that define an adequate single-unit graft, and the indication and acceptable cell dose criteria for double-unit grafts. The acceptable criteria for 6-loci (HLA-A, -B antigen, -DRB1 allele) and 8-allele (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1) donor-recipient HLA match, the evaluation of patients with donor-specific HLA antibodies, and the multiple determinants of unit quality are also reviewed in detail. Finally, a practical step-by-step guide to CB searches and the principles that guide ultimate graft selection are outlined.

Table of Contents
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
,
2020
,
citations by CoLab: 0


Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Consolidation in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Mayo Clinic Experience
Khurana A., Micallef I.N., LaPlant B.R., Patrick O’Neill B., Habermann T.M., Ansell S.M., Inwards D.J., Porrata L.F., Paludo J., Bisneto J.C., Johnston P.B.
A paucity of randomized phase III clinical trials in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has resulted in no uniform consensus on the optimal strategy for consolidation and conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The past 2 decades have witnessed a preference for thiotepa (TT)-based conditioning regimens due to superior central nervous system penetration. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients with PCNSL who underwent ASCT at Mayo Clinic, Rochester over the past 2 decades, and the impact of TT-based conditioning regimens. Fifty-six patients underwent transplant for PCNSL, with 25 and 31 patients receiving BEAM (non-thiotepa) and carmustine (BCNU)/TT-based conditioning, respectively. All patients received high-dose methotrexate-based induction therapy. While the BCNU/TT group had higher risk disease features such as high International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group prognostic score, elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein, and older patient population, there was no significant difference at 2 years post-transplant in progression-free survival (BEAM 68.0% [46.1% to 82.5%] versus BCNU/TT, 65.5% [45.2% to 79.8%], P = .99) or overall survival (OS) (84.0% [62.8% to 93.7%] in the BEAM group versus 81.6% [61.3% to 91.9%] in the BCNU/TT group, P = .95). Disease response status before transplant significantly affected the outcomes as those in complete remission had an OS at 2 years post-transplant of 94.7% (68.1% to 99.2%) in the BEAM group and 90.5% (67.0% to 97.5%) in the BCNU/TT group compared with those in partial response, 57.1% (17.2% to 83.7%) in BCNU/TT group and 50.0% (11.1% to 80.4%) in the BEAM group, respectively (P

Goal-Oriented Monitoring of Cyclosporine Is Effective for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Sickle Cell Disease and Thalassemia Major
Gauthier A., Bleyzac N., Garnier N., Kebaili K., Joly P., Goutagny M., Mollet I., Goutelle S., Renard C., Bertrand Y.
Abstract Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an important challenge and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Herein we report our institution's experience of goal-oriented Bayesian monitoring for cyclosporine (CsA) used alone as GVHD prophylaxis during the post-transplant period in pediatric patients with thalassemia major (TM) or sickle cell anemia (SCA) undergoing HLA-matched HSCT. We also studied evolution of chimerism. Twenty-six consecutive patients (SCA, 14; TM, 12) underwent matched sibling donor (MSD) HSCT from 2004 to 2014. All patients received a myeloablative conditioning regimen. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of 20 mg/kg antithymocyte globulin in the conditioning regimens and then CsA alone in the post-transplant period. Target CsA trough blood concentration (TBC) was 150 ± 20 ng/mL. At last follow-up, all patients were alive and free of disease, even in cases of mixed chimerism. Engraftment occurred in all patients. No patient developed grades II to IV acute GVHD, 4 patients developed acute grade I skin GVHD, and only 1 presented with chronic pulmonary GVHD. A better control of GVHD and immunosuppression by a strict monitoring of CsA TBC as described herein is promising and could play a crucial role. Further investigations are required, but this study opens new perspectives to improve survival and safety of HSCT from alternative donors in TM and SCA to levels compatible with that obtained with MSDs.

Peritransplantation Use of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis
Ibrahim U., Petrone G.E., Mascarenhas J., Keyzner A.
Ruxolitinib is an oral JAK1/2 inhibitor that is approved for use in patients with intermediate and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) based on its proven spleen and symptom burden reduction. Its impact on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes is largely unknown, however. A significant number of patients proceeding to HSCT have been treated with ruxolitinib, and the specifics of its peritransplantation use vary widely in the published literature. Here we review the currently published data and experience to guide management of patients with MF on ruxolitinib proceeding to HSCT.

Real-World Issues and Potential Solutions in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Health Services and International Studies Committee
Algwaiz G., Aljurf M., Koh M., Horowitz M.M., Ljungman P., Weisdorf D., Saber W., Kodera Y., Szer J., Jawdat D., Wood W.A., Brazauskas R., Lehmann L., Pasquini M.C., Seber A., et. al.
ABSTRACT The current COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has impacted many facets of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in both developed and developing countries. Realizing the challenges as a result of this pandemic affecting the daily practice of the HCT centers and the recognition of the variability in practice worldwide, the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research's (CIBMTR) Health Services and International Studies Committee have jointly produced an expert opinion statement as a general guide to deal with certain aspects of HCT, including diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 in HCT recipient, pre- and post-HCT management, donor issues, medical tourism, and facilities management. During these crucial times, which may last for months or years, the HCT community must reorganize to proceed with transplantation activity in those patients who urgently require it, albeit with extreme caution. This shared knowledge may be of value to the HCT community in the absence of high-quality evidence-based medicine. © 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Propylene Glycol-Free Melphalan versus PG-Melphalan as Conditioning for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myeloma
Monahan K., Kleman A., Thapa B., Szabo A., D'Souza A., Dhakal B., Jerkins J.H., Pasquini M.C., Hamadani M., Hari P.N., Chhabra S.
High-dose melphalan (Mel) conditioning before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) is standard of care for patients with transplantation-eligible multiple myeloma. The traditional lyophilized Mel formulation has inadequate solubility and stability after reconstitution, leading to the use of propylene glycol (PG) as a solubilizing agent. A newer PG-free Mel preparation (Evomela) uses beta cyclodextrin captisol as a solubilizing agent and was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a conditioning agent based on a single-phase IIb study showing bioequivalence. We compared the outcomes of consecutive patients with myeloma undergoing autoHCT using the 2 formulations of Mel for conditioning as our center switched from using the older formulation (PG-Mel) to the newer one (PGF-Mel). Of 294 autoHCT recipients, 162 received PG-Mel conditioning and 132 received PGF-Mel conditioning. The PGF-Mel group was older and had a lower average Karnofsky Performance Status score. PGF-Mel was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (median, 12 days versus 13 days; P < .001), fewer grade 3-4 infections within 30 days of autoHCT (1.5% versus 8.0%; P = .048), and a lower 30-day rehospitalization rate (6.8% versus 17.9%; P = .04), as confirmed by propensity-weighted analysis. No significant between-group differences were detected in mucositis, organ toxicity, myeloma response, or 100-day mortality.

Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients
Bhargava D., Arora M., DeFor T.E., Brunstein C.G., Thyagarajan B., El Jurdi N., Holtan S.G., Rashidi A., Warlick E., Ramesh V., Rogosheske J., Bhatia S., Weisdorf D.J.
The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) using Beers criteria and its impact on older allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients is not known. Here the use of any PIMs and their therapeutic classes in reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic HCT recipients were compared between older (≥65 years; n = 114) and younger (40 to 64 years; n = 240) patients during their initial HCT admission, defined as the number of days that a patient received 1 or more PIMs between day -14 and day +28. Poisson regression was used to determine rate ratios (RRs) in the 2 groups. In the ≥65 years group, we evaluated the impact of PIMs on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3-4 toxicities within 100 days and on overall mortality within 1 year post-HCT. The rate of any PIM use was similar in the older and younger groups (RR, .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .90 to 1.06; P = .65). In terms of PIM classes, the older group had a 48% higher rate of gastrointestinal (GI) medication use (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.65; P < .01) and a 25% higher rate of genitourinary (GU) medication use (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.53; P = .03). Compared with males, females had a 19% higher rate of central nervous system (CNS) medication use (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.37; P = .02) and a 30% higher rate of benzodiazepine use (RR, 1.30; 95% CI. 1.09 to 1.54; P < .01). A high-risk HCT-CI was associated with a higher rate of use of any PIMs (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.26; P = .02), CNS medications (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.53; P = .02) and GU medications (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.94; P = .01). Compared with matched sibling donor HCT recipients, umbilical cord blood transplantation recipients had higher rates of GI medication use (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.53; P < .01) and anticholinergic medication use (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.61; P = .01). In the ≥65 years group, increasing duration of narcotic use was associated with a 1.3-fold (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.7; P = .05) higher risk of overall mortality and a 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.02 to 2.69) greater odds of CTCAE grade 3-4 toxicities (P = .04). Our data show that older recipients (≥65 years) were as likely as their younger counterparts to receive PIMs. Among older recipients, the use of PIMs, particularly narcotics, was associated with higher mortality and higher incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities. Identifying and reducing the use of PIMs in older HCT recipients may help decrease the burden of adverse events and associated health care costs.

Clinical and Neuroimaging Correlates of Post-Transplant Delirium
Smith P., Thompson J.C., Perea E., Wasserman B., Bohannon L., Racioppi A., Choi T., Gasparetto C., Horwitz M.E., Long G., Lopez R., Rizzieri D.A., Sarantopoulos S., Sullivan K.M., Chao N.J., et. al.
Delirium is common among adults undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), although the clinical and neuroimaging correlates of post-HCT delirium have not been adequately delineated. We therefore examined the frequency of delirium and neuroimaging correlates of post-transplant delirium in a retrospective cohort of 115 adults undergoing neuroimaging after allogeneic HCT. Delirium was established using previously validated methods for retrospective identification of chart-assessed postprocedural delirium. Chart reviews were independently conducted by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in HCT, psychiatry, and psychology on consecutive allogeneic HCT patients who underwent neuroimaging assessments and transplantation at a single center between January 2009 and December 2016. Neuroimaging markers of white matter damage and brain volume loss were also recorded. In total, 115 patients were included, ranging in age from 20 to 74 years (mean [SD] age, 49 [13]). Fifty-three patients (46%) developed post-HCT delirium. In an adjusted model, delirium incidence was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.92 [1.28, 2.87] per decade, P = .002), greater severity of white matter hyperintensities (OR, 1.95 [1.06, 3.57], P = .031), and conditioning intensity (OR, 6.37 [2.20, 18.45], P < .001) but was unrelated to cortical atrophy (P = .777). Delirium was associated with fewer hospital-free days (P = .023) but was not associated with overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.95 [0.56, 1.61], P = .844). Greater incidence of delirium following HCT was associated with greater age, microvascular burden, and conditioning intensity. Pre-HCT consideration of microvascular burden and other neuroimaging biomarkers of risk may be warranted.

Predicting Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: Performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and Development of a New Prognostic Model
Hernández-Boluda J., Pereira A., Alvarez-Larran A., Martín A., Benzaquen A., Aguirre L., Mora E., González P., Mora J., Dorado N., Sampol A., García-Gutiérrez V., López-Godino O., Fox M., Reguera J.L., et. al.
Accurate prognostic tools are crucial to assess the risk/benefit ratio of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and identify risk factors for survival in a multicenter series of 197 patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 47% of patients had died, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 51%. Projected 5-year risk of nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence was 30% and 20%, respectively. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were a hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥3 and receiving a graft from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor or cord blood, whereas post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) was associated with improved survival. Donor type was the only parameter included in the MTSS model with independent prognostic value for survival. According to the MTSS, 3-year survival was 62%, 66%, 37%, and 17% for low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups, respectively. By pooling together the low- and intermediate-risk groups, as well as the high- and very high-risk groups, we pinpointed 2 categories: standard risk and high risk (25% of the series). Three-year survival was 62% in standard-risk and 25% in high-risk categories (P We derived a risk score based on the 3 independent risk factors for survival in our series (donor type, HCT-CI, and PT-Cy). The corresponding 5-year survival for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories was 79%, 55%, and 32%, respectively (P In conclusion, the MTSS model failed to clearly delineate 4 prognostic groups in our series but may still be useful to identify a subset of patients with poor outcome. We provide a simple prognostic scoring system for risk/benefit considerations before transplantation in patients with MF.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Journal of Industrial Relations
2246 citations, 15.65%
|
|
Labour & Industry a journal of the social and economic relations of work
808 citations, 5.63%
|
|
Economic and Labour Relations Review
432 citations, 3.01%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
352 citations, 2.45%
|
|
Economic and Industrial Democracy
315 citations, 2.2%
|
|
International Journal of Human Resource Management
299 citations, 2.08%
|
|
British Journal of Industrial Relations
249 citations, 1.74%
|
|
Industrial Relations Journal
246 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Employee Relations
226 citations, 1.58%
|
|
Work, Employment and Society
148 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Industrial Relations
112 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Economic Record
111 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Relations industrielles
108 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
99 citations, 0.69%
|
|
ILR Review
98 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Human Resource Management Journal
96 citations, 0.67%
|
|
European Journal of Industrial Relations
89 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Gender, Work and Organization
86 citations, 0.6%
|
|
New Technology, Work and Employment
83 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Australian Economic Review
74 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Human Relations
71 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Labor History
71 citations, 0.49%
|
|
International Journal of Manpower
66 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Labor Studies Journal
66 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Transfer
59 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Management and Organization
57 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Personnel Review
56 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Sustainability
49 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Safety Science
46 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
43 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Australian Journal of Public Administration
42 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Human Resource Management
41 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Economic Papers
39 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations
38 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
37 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Labour Review
35 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Critical Sociology
35 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Community, Work and Family
35 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Sociology
34 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Contemporary Asia
34 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Australian Journal of Management
33 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Australian Economic Papers
33 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Revue internationale du Travail
33 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Human Resource Management Review
32 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Revista Internacional del Trabajo
32 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Labour History
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
30 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Australian Journal of Social Issues
29 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Environment and Planning A
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Griffith Law Review
27 citations, 0.19%
|
|
British Journal of Management
26 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Socio-Economic Review
26 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
24 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Management Reviews
24 citations, 0.17%
|
|
European Management Journal
23 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Antipode
22 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
21 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Work and Occupations
21 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Globalizations
21 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Extractive Industries and Society
21 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Asia Pacific Business Review
21 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Applied Economics
20 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Review of Applied Economics
20 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
20 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Organizational Analysis
20 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Management
19 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Energy Research and Social Science
19 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Négociations
19 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Competition and Change
18 citations, 0.13%
|
|
SAGE Open
18 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Labor Research
18 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development
18 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Labour Economics
17 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Organization
17 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Development and Change
17 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Social Policy and Administration
17 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Sociology Compass
17 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Management Studies
17 citations, 0.12%
|
|
La Revue de l Ires
16 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Critical Perspectives on International Business
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Management
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Organizational Change Management
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Cambridge Journal of Economics
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Management History
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Social Economics
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Capital and Class
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Feminist Economics
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Health Services
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Singapore Economic Review
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Women's Studies International Forum
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Policy and Society
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
New Political Economy
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Australian Educational Researcher
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Australian Historical Studies
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
|
|
SAGE
4120 citations, 28.71%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2244 citations, 15.64%
|
|
Wiley
2133 citations, 14.87%
|
|
Emerald
973 citations, 6.78%
|
|
Springer Nature
724 citations, 5.05%
|
|
Elsevier
715 citations, 4.98%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
340 citations, 2.37%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
313 citations, 2.18%
|
|
MDPI
145 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Oxford University Press
131 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
127 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Cornell University Press
91 citations, 0.63%
|
|
CAIRN
81 citations, 0.56%
|
|
IGI Global
75 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
63 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Australian Society for the Study of Labour History
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
World Scientific
27 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Academy of Management
24 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Bristol University Press
24 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
18 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Pluto Journals
16 citations, 0.11%
|
|
SciELO
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
AOSIS
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
CLOCKSS Archive
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
OpenEdition
11 citations, 0.08%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
11 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Annual Reviews
10 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IOS Press
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institut francais des relations internationales (IFRI)
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
BMJ
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Early Childhood Australia
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Intellect
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Kyushu University
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Unisa Press
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
French Centre for Research on Contemporary China
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cogitatio
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
EDP Sciences
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Brill
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ministere du Travail et de la Participation
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Duke University Press
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Asian Studies at the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AIP Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editora Universidade de Brasilia
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Lavoisier
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Index Copernicus
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Linkoping University Electronic Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society of Comparative Law
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Economic Association
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Public Health Association
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
North-West University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Institute of Industrial Health
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Science Alert
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Thomas Telford
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
PERSEE Program
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
F1000 Research
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Guilford Publications
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Duncker & Humblot GmbH
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
University of California Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
University of Sydney
478 publications, 13.42%
|
|
University of Melbourne
175 publications, 4.91%
|
|
Monash University
152 publications, 4.27%
|
|
University of New South Wales
122 publications, 3.42%
|
|
Griffith University
119 publications, 3.34%
|
|
University of Western Australia
111 publications, 3.12%
|
|
University of Wollongong
84 publications, 2.36%
|
|
Macquarie University
80 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Australian National University
69 publications, 1.94%
|
|
Flinders University
56 publications, 1.57%
|
|
University of Adelaide
55 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Newcastle University
49 publications, 1.38%
|
|
La Trobe University
45 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Queensland
40 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
38 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
35 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
31 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
31 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of South Australia
30 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Curtin University
28 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Deakin University
22 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
19 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Otago
19 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Western Sydney University
18 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Manchester
16 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
15 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Cardiff University
15 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Auckland
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Tasmania
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Toronto
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Warwick
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Cornell University
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Canberra
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Duke University
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
McMaster University
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Cambridge
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Massey University
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Murdoch University
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
York University
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Renmin University of China
7 publications, 0.2%
|
|
King's College London
7 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Nottingham
7 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
7 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
7 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Oxford
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Chung-Ang University
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Leeds
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Paris Sciences et Lettres
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Waikato
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Minnesota
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Université Laval
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Alberta
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Bath
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Milan
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Aalborg University
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Michigan State University
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Loughborough University
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Birmingham
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Canterbury
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of the West of England
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Purdue University
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Karlstad University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Glasgow
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Southern Queensland
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Southern Cross University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Korea University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Wayne State University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
McGill University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of York
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 publications, 0.06%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Lucknow
2 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Lulea University of Technology
2 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Capital University of Economics and Business
2 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Durham University
2 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Liverpool
2 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
University of Sydney
28 publications, 12.02%
|
|
University of New South Wales
11 publications, 4.72%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
10 publications, 4.29%
|
|
Griffith University
7 publications, 3%
|
|
Monash University
6 publications, 2.58%
|
|
University of Western Australia
6 publications, 2.58%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
6 publications, 2.58%
|
|
University of Melbourne
5 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Macquarie University
5 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
5 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of Wollongong
4 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Western Sydney University
3 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of Manchester
3 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Cornell University
3 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Massey University
3 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Deakin University
3 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of South Australia
3 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
3 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of Toronto
3 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Renmin University of China
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
King's College London
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Adelaide
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Tasmania
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Notre Dame Australia
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
York University
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Extremadura
2 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Haifa
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Karlstad University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Lausanne
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Capital University of Economics and Business
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Durham University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Aalborg University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Liverpool
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Auckland
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Curtin University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
La Trobe University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Murdoch Children's Research Institute
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Flinders University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Central Queensland University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Torrens University Australia
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Federation University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Princeton University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Chung-Ang University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Colorado State University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Newcastle University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Georgia State University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of the West of England
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Austral University of Chile
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Seville
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Hamburg University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Münster
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Utrecht University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Leiden University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Cardiff University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Trier University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Bielefeld University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Leeds
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Vienna University of Economics and Business
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Salisbury University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1837, 51.56%
Australia
1837 publications, 51.56%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 459, 12.88%
United Kingdom
459 publications, 12.88%
|
USA
|
USA, 168, 4.72%
USA
168 publications, 4.72%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 97, 2.72%
New Zealand
97 publications, 2.72%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 68, 1.91%
Canada
68 publications, 1.91%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 51, 1.43%
Iraq
51 publications, 1.43%
|
China
|
China, 35, 0.98%
China
35 publications, 0.98%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 19, 0.53%
Italy
19 publications, 0.53%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 17, 0.48%
Germany
17 publications, 0.48%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 14, 0.39%
Denmark
14 publications, 0.39%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 14, 0.39%
Ireland
14 publications, 0.39%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 14, 0.39%
Sweden
14 publications, 0.39%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 12, 0.34%
Republic of Korea
12 publications, 0.34%
|
India
|
India, 10, 0.28%
India
10 publications, 0.28%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 9, 0.25%
Spain
9 publications, 0.25%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 7, 0.2%
Japan
7 publications, 0.2%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 6, 0.17%
Belgium
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 6, 0.17%
Netherlands
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 6, 0.17%
Singapore
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 0.17%
Switzerland
6 publications, 0.17%
|
France
|
France, 5, 0.14%
France
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 0.14%
Austria
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 5, 0.14%
Israel
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.14%
Norway
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 5, 0.14%
Chile
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.11%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 4, 0.11%
Papua New Guinea
4 publications, 0.11%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 0.11%
South Africa
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.08%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 0.08%
Thailand
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.06%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.06%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 2, 0.06%
Cambodia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.06%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.06%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.06%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.03%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.03%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.03%
Greece
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.03%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.03%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.03%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.03%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.03%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.03%
UAE
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.03%
Finland
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (15 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Australia
|
Australia, 112, 48.07%
Australia
112 publications, 48.07%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 25, 10.73%
United Kingdom
25 publications, 10.73%
|
USA
|
USA, 16, 6.87%
USA
16 publications, 6.87%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 14, 6.01%
Canada
14 publications, 6.01%
|
China
|
China, 7, 3%
China
7 publications, 3%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 6, 2.58%
Germany
6 publications, 2.58%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 6, 2.58%
New Zealand
6 publications, 2.58%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 2.15%
Ireland
5 publications, 2.15%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 5, 2.15%
Spain
5 publications, 2.15%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 1.72%
Netherlands
4 publications, 1.72%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 4, 1.72%
Chile
4 publications, 1.72%
|
France
|
France, 3, 1.29%
France
3 publications, 1.29%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.86%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.86%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.86%
Austria
2 publications, 0.86%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.86%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.86%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.86%
India
2 publications, 0.86%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.86%
Norway
2 publications, 0.86%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.86%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.86%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.86%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.86%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.86%
Japan
2 publications, 0.86%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.43%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.43%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.43%
Israel
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.43%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.43%
Italy
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 1, 0.43%
Cambodia
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.43%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.43%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.43%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.43%
UAE
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.43%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.43%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.43%
Finland
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Show all (2 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|