Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
1.6
SJR
0.874
CiteScore
2.5
Categories
Industrial Relations
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Years of issue
2019-2025
journal names
Industrial Relations Journal
IND RELAT J
Top-3 citing journals

Industrial Relations Journal
(1552 citations)

Employee Relations
(696 citations)

Economic and Industrial Democracy
(681 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Warwick
(69 publications)

Cardiff University
(47 publications)

University of Nottingham
(45 publications)

Cardiff University
(14 publications)

University College Dublin
(7 publications)

University of Manchester
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2482
Q2

Financialisation and intangible assets in emerging market economies: evidence from Brazil
Jibril H., Kaltenbrunner A., Kesidou E.
Abstract
Whereas previously scholars advocated a positive relationship between a growing size of the financial sector and economic growth, most recent evidence has shown that this might not be the case at all times. The financialisation literature has pointed to some of the mechanisms through which the increasing size and changing structure of the financial system might weigh negatively on growth through the changing financial relations of non-financial corporations (NFCs). This paper contributes to this debate on several grounds. First, rather than interrogating the relationship between finance and firms’ tangible investments, it focuses on firms’ intangible investments, arguably a sine-qua-non for innovativeness and productivity-enhancing structural change. Drawing on an emerging literature on intangible assets, innovation, and development studies, we highlight the important role of investment into intangible assets, in the context of developing economies. Second, by bringing together the literatures on access to finance, intangible assets, and financialisation, we delineate analytically three specific channels through which finance can affect intangible assets. Third, this is the first paper that tests empirically all three channels using the population of publicly listed manufacturing companies in an Emerging Market Economy, Brazil over the period 2011–2016. Our results confirm the potentially negative impact of financialisation on intangible assets through the crowding-out channel, that is, firm’s increased tendency to hold financial assets reduces intangible assets. Our findings also confirm the shareholder-value orientation channel, that is, firm’s payments of dividends reduce intangibles assets.
Q2

Marshall’s economics of work: a reassessment
Spencer D.A.
Abstract
This article reassesses some key aspects of Alfred Marshall’s economics of work, showing their value, limitations and enduring relevance for modern economic enquiry. It establishes that, for Marshall, work mattered not just because of the income it gave to workers, but also because of the kind of lives that it enabled workers to lead. Based on a wide conception of work, Marshall supported the reform of work, including the reduction of working hours, in order to improve workers’ quality of life. The article argues that some of Marshall’s core ideas on work and work reform can offer help in rethinking how modern economics conceptualises work and how it approaches issues of progress in workers’ well-being.
Q2

Analysing technical change with heterodox price theories
Bloch H.
Abstract
Elements of price theory from Schumpeterian, Sraffian and post-Keynesian economics are combined to analyse the impact of labour-saving technical change on prices. The resulting synthesis incorporates the realism of post-Keynesian pricing rules and the emphasis on long-period analysis by Sraffa along with Schumpeter’s insight that capitalism develops ‘from within’ in a disruptive and uneven manner through innovations. Applying elements from heterodox theories to analyse the relationship between technical change and the movement of prices demonstrates the fruitfulness of heterodox price theory in understanding the development of modern capitalist economies.
Q2

The political economy of philanthropy: Vidich’s contribution to a revamped intellectual endeavour
Ochoa-Carreno L.
Abstract
The prevailing approach to philanthropy among economists has revolved around individual giving behaviour. Although some elements for a political economy perspective to philanthropy were sketched by a few economists in the 60s and 70s, they were disjointed and such an approach never took off. This article reviews the early evolution of economic thinking on philanthropy and examines the ideas of sociologist Arthur Vidich, which provide relevant elements for the construction of a systemic, political economy framework to philanthropy. Building on Marxist analytical principles, Vidich offers some organising themes for the study of philanthropy from a sociologist’s viewpoint. However, the economic nature of this phenomenon is somewhat missing in his work and needs to be addressed. This article explores two major channels through which the contemporary economic dynamics affects philanthropy: the financialisation and the technological change, and calls for a comprehensive inclusion of philanthropy in the analysis of the economic system.
Q2

Keynes and the Provincial investment problem
Woods J.E.
Abstract
From early 1924 until his death in 1946, Keynes was actively involved in managing the assets of the Provincial Insurance Company, based in Kendal, Westmorland. From 1940, increasing responsibilities advising the UK Government meant a gradual reduction in day-to-day management activities, his replacement being Ian Macpherson, the senior partner of the London stock-broking firm, Buckmaster & Moore, who was well known to both Keynes and F. C. Scott, The Provincial’s managing director. The Provincial materials reproduced in Chapter 1 of Volume XII of The Collected Writings suggest increasing differences of opinion between them on investment policy from the late 1930s. A review of their correspondence in the Keynes Archive at King’s College, Cambridge, demonstrates that such differences were more serious than previously understood, with Scott imposing a significant change to Keynes’ policy in 1942 by creating the low-volatility Stable Fund accounting for 40% of total assets. Eventually, in mid-1944, this change presented Macpherson with a problem he described to Keynes as ‘most intractable’ and also involved him telling Keynes that Scott ‘does not understand the elementary principles and theory of investment’. In this article, we review Keynes’ relationship with The Provincial, tracing the development of this ‘most intractable problem’ by means of three Case Studies, which provide insights into not only his role at The Provincial but also the principles underlying the unconventional, oblique investment approach he practised in the 1930s and 1940s, as distinct from his credit cycling policy of the 1920s.
Q2

The history of economic thought as a living laboratory
McCaffrey M.C., Salerno J.T., Dorobat C.E.
Abstract
We propose a novel and constructive way to conceptualise the history of economic thought and appreciate its value within economics more broadly. Drawing on the work of economists spanning nearly a century, we explore the idea of the history of economic thought as a living laboratory of theorising. It is living in that it is a persistently relevant method of doing economic theory, as opposed to a separable field or even a dead branch of economics. It is a laboratory in that it provides a constrained space for examining, comparing, critiquing, combining, and developing theories. Following an initial explanation, we explore the roots of this conceptualisation in the works of some twentieth-century economists. We then illustrate it using the example of the development of neo-Wicksellian macroeconomics. We conclude with a discussion of the advantages and limitations of the living laboratory approach.
Q2

Social relations, social positioning theory and Marx
Lawson T.
Abstract
Aspects of social positioning theory and central features of Marx’s general ontological, and specifically social relational, presuppositions are compared and found to be rather similar. Furthermore, various long-standing debates and puzzles surrounding Marx’s ontological assessments and preconceptions are seen to be reasonably easily resolved if we view Marx as everywhere drawing on a social relational framework along the lines of a social positioning conception.
Q2

A ticking time bomb? The impact of objective class and stratification beliefs on societal conflict perceptions in South Africa
Kirsten F., Biyase M.
Abstract
In South Africa, inequality has worsened over the past two decades, leading to the country being recognised as the most unequal society globally. The escalating inequality has sparked social conflicts, threatening the already fragile social cohesion. However, there is a limited understanding of public perceptions regarding these conflicts; it is crucial to comprehend their dynamics. To shed light on this issue, we used the International Social Survey Programme dataset for 2009 and 2019 to investigate the changing factors influencing perceived social conflict (PSC) in South Africa, specifically testing the role of objective class positions and stratification beliefs. Our findings reveal that objective class plays a significant and reinforced role in shaping perceptions of social conflict, aligning with the Marxist notion of a strong link between class position and conflict perceptions through class consciousness. Middle-class imagery does not affect PSC and tolerance for inequality and also exerts diminished influence on PSC. Overall, these results offer valuable insights for policymakers in their efforts to address the pressing issues of class, conflict and inequality. This is particularly true in the aftermath of the July 2021 unrest while South Africa continues to grapple with social instability caused by deep class divisions.
Q2

Hayek and Schmitt on the ‘depoliticization’ of the economy
Nientiedt D.
Abstract
Both Friedrich Hayek and Carl Schmitt criticize the role played by economic interest groups in modern democracies. This paper points out that their descriptions of how such groups attempt to obtain favourable treatment from the state (‘rent seeking’) are highly similar. The paper then discusses their proposed solutions. Schmitt’s solution, referred to as ‘depoliticization’, involves the establishment of an authoritarian state together with a corporatist economic system. Hayek, by contrast, argues in favour of constitutionally limiting the ability of politicians to grant privileges to economic groups. The paper further asks whether, as claimed in the literature, Hayek’s solution is similar to Schmitt’s in that both attempt to shield the free market economy from democratic oversight. It is reasoned that Hayek’s solution is not undemocratic (unless one defines democracy as pure majoritarianism), while Schmitt’s solution is not conducive to free markets.
Q2

Technical progress, organisational innovations and labour intensity
Brondino G., Gaddi M., Garbellini N.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to discuss the combined effects of Industry 4.0 and lean production in the context of global supply chains on working conditions. Our thesis is that the changes of technique based on integrating Industry 4.0 technologies with lean production incur a substantial cost to labour, manifesting as increased work intensity. In Marxian terminology, they have increased the extraction rate of relative surplus value. Our contribution is closely related to the critical global value chain literature and proposes to contribute to this literature by emphasising the relevance of Industry 4.0 technologies in implementing lean production methods and reinforcing control by head companies over the entire chain. Additionally, it discusses how these dynamics manifest in companies and impact the world of work through surveys conducted with workers. These surveys were carried out in a set of Italian metal-mechanical companies involved in various global chains.
Q2

The relevance of Marshall’s thought today: from methodological eclecticism to his sociological outlook
Pietrini F.
Abstract
This article leverages the reinterpretations of Marshall emerged from the 1970s onwards to elucidate his philosophical vision, notably in relation to the application of models in economics and to his outlook on ethical progress. The literature showed how Marshall’s cognitive theory can be linked both to his method in studying market equilibria and to his view of social and industrial evolution (Dardi, 2016, 2019; Raffaelli et al., 1994b; Raffaelli, 2003). The focus of the present work is on the elements of his philosophical grounding discernible in both the logical connections mentioned above. The contribution to the literature consists of an interpretation of the lecture on American industry in Whitaker, (1975a) as an insight of a sociologist of knowledge ante litteram. Thus the paper broadens, with respect to Dardi, 2016, the field of Whewell’s influence on Alfred Marshall: from the methodology (Whewell’s idea of the dualistic nature of mathematics linked to the Cambridge mathematical intuitionism) to the causal relationship between industry and character and to Marshall’s keen eye for sociological facets. In many respects a contemporary Marshall comes to the fore, proving particularly valuable for those still grappling with epistemological issues in the social sciences.
Q2

The Marshall–Fetter controversy over the ‘old rent concept’
McCaffrey M.
Abstract
Alfred Marshall’s theory of rent was a watershed moment in economics, and his ideas on the subject continue to (positively and negatively) influence economists and social scientists well into the twenty-first century. Far less well known is the scathing critique of Marshall’s theory published by Frank A. Fetter in the Quarterly Journal of Economics in 1901. Fetter identified several concepts of rent in Marshall’s work that he attacked as contradictory, arguing that Marshall embraced classical errors while still attempting to emancipate himself from them. Marshall responded by adding a critical note on Fetter to the 5th edition of his Principles (1907), but otherwise showed little public interest in a reply. However, archival evidence reveals that both Marshall and Fetter took this dispute seriously and personally, and that they continued to debate each other at a distance for several decades. This paper brings to light previously unknown archival sources—including unpublished notes, correspondence and manuscripts—to tell the full story of their controversy. Doing so sheds new light on the work of both men and adds in several ways to our understanding of the early history of neoclassical economics, of the development of the theory of rent and of theoretical paths not taken.
Q2

Inflation targeting and the real exchange rate trend: theoretical discussion and empirical evidence for developed and developing countries
Nassif A., Feijó C., Araújo E., Leão R.
Abstract
Economic literature shows evidence that a competitive real exchange rate (RER), i.e., slightly undervalued, is key for development in developing countries. This paper discusses the connections between inflation targeting (IT) regimes and RER trends in economies highly open to capital flows. Following Rodrik’s (2008. The real exchange rate and economic growth, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Washington, 2008, vol. 39, no. 2 (Fall), 365–439), the RER trend is estimated for a sample of 31 out of the 38 developed and developing countries that, by the final year of the period covered in this study (2019), had already adopted IT. Covering the period 2000–2019, we showed that all developed and Latin American developing countries had an RER overvaluation trend, while the European, Asian and African (South Africa) developing countries registered an undervaluation trend in the same period. Through a dynamic panel data model, we tested and validated the following hypotheses, which, to the best of our knowledge, are a seminal contribution. We found in Latin American developing countries, whose ITs are centred on the main objective of pursuing price stability, the RER overvaluation trend (a by-product of this monetary policy regime) is driven by higher interest rate differentials to the USA and is harmful to their economic growth. In developed countries, this trend is not explained by their IT framework but by their high per capita income level, which reflects their high average labour productivity and development pattern. Yet, the trend of RER undervaluation in Asian and European developing countries and South Africa reflects their governments’ ability to combine a more flexible IT regime with a floating but managed exchange rate system aimed at preserving a competitive and stable RER in the long term.
Q2

Central bank balance sheets under foreign exchange accumulation: insights from endogenous money theory and monetary policy implementation
Bozhinovska S.
Abstract
This article proposes to draw on the recent experiences of many central banks of advanced economies and the evolution of their operational frameworks in the new context of increased domestic liquidity when analyzing the operations of central banks that engage in exchange rate management and increase their official foreign reserves as a result. It argues that the theoretical literature on endogenous money set within the context of an open economy with an exchange rate objective needs to be amended to account for such developments, as it would be entirely possible for a central bank that accumulates substantial foreign reserves to adopt a floor system and thus maintain a near-perfect control over its policy interest rate without the need for any compensating measure. On the grounds of the reverse causation argument, establishing a direct link between the foreign reserves and the monetary base should not entail any quantitative effect on other economic variables.
Q2

Capital nationality and long-run economic development
Klein Martins G.
Abstract
This article reviews different literature strands and performs empirical tests to identify new stylized facts on how capital ownership, particularly its nationality, relates to long-run economic development. The results indicate that low- and middle-income countries with larger foreign capital stock in 1980 had lower economic growth over the next four decades. The estimations also suggest that these economies developed a less specialized export basket, which became relatively more concentrated in low-tech goods. The results are inverted to high-income economies, for which the relationship is positive for GDP growth and export specialization and complexity. These stylized facts are in line with (and can be interpreted as a test to) the hypothesis proposed by Alice Amsden’s seminal book ‘The Rise of the Rest’ (2001) to explain different growth trajectories among developing countries. The results can also be interpreted in light of theoretical and empirical evidence that foreign capital might reinforce static comparative advantages in developing economies, particularly in middle-income ones.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
|
Industrial Relations Journal
1552 citations, 9%
|
|
Employee Relations
696 citations, 4.03%
|
|
Economic and Industrial Democracy
681 citations, 3.95%
|
|
British Journal of Industrial Relations
649 citations, 3.76%
|
|
Work, Employment and Society
522 citations, 3.03%
|
|
Journal of Industrial Relations
482 citations, 2.79%
|
|
International Journal of Human Resource Management
468 citations, 2.71%
|
|
European Journal of Industrial Relations
441 citations, 2.56%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
369 citations, 2.14%
|
|
Human Resource Management Journal
280 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Transfer
257 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Personnel Review
239 citations, 1.39%
|
|
New Technology, Work and Employment
207 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Labour & Industry a journal of the social and economic relations of work
165 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Relations industrielles
158 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Human Relations
153 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Capital and Class
147 citations, 0.85%
|
|
ILR Review
142 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Industrial Relations
136 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Labor History
94 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Human Resource Management
93 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Economic and Labour Relations Review
93 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Labor Studies Journal
92 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Gender, Work and Organization
90 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Management Studies
81 citations, 0.47%
|
|
International Journal of Manpower
80 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
66 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Organization Studies
63 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Competition and Change
48 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations
44 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Socio-Economic Review
43 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
41 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Human Resource Management Review
41 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
40 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Labor Research
39 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Cambridge Journal of Economics
38 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Management Research News
38 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
37 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Safety Science
37 citations, 0.21%
|
|
British Journal of Management
37 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Work and Occupations
37 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Organization
36 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Labour Review
35 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Small Business Journal
35 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Revue internationale du Travail
35 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Revista Internacional del Trabajo
34 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Sustainability
33 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Asia Pacific Business Review
33 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of European Social Policy
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Regional Studies
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Vocational Education and Training
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Common Market Studies
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
29 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Accounting, Organizations and Society
29 citations, 0.17%
|
|
La Revue de l Ires
29 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Sociology
27 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Management Reviews
27 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Education and Work
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of European Public Policy
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Policy Studies
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Social Policy and Administration
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Critical Sociology
24 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Health Services
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Social Economics
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Management Decision
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Critical Perspectives on International Business
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Business History
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Environment and Planning A
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of European Industrial Training
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
New Political Economy
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Geoforum
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Sociological Review
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Applied Economics
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
German Journal of Human Resource Management
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
European Management Journal
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Studies of Management and Organization
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Contemporary Asia
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of International Business Studies
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Organizational Behavior
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Labour
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Public Sector Management
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Sociologie du Travail
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Labour Economics
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Management
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Organizational Change Management
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Small Business Economics
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Leadership and Organization Development Journal
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Comparative Social Research
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Comparative European Politics
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Urban Studies
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
West European Politics
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Antipode
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
|
|
Wiley
4007 citations, 23.23%
|
|
SAGE
3800 citations, 22.03%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1854 citations, 10.75%
|
|
Emerald
1826 citations, 10.58%
|
|
Elsevier
698 citations, 4.05%
|
|
Springer Nature
655 citations, 3.8%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
355 citations, 2.06%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
198 citations, 1.15%
|
|
Oxford University Press
182 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
180 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Cornell University Press
138 citations, 0.8%
|
|
CAIRN
108 citations, 0.63%
|
|
MDPI
100 citations, 0.58%
|
|
IGI Global
60 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
43 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
42 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Academy of Management
35 citations, 0.2%
|
|
OpenEdition
32 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Bristol University Press
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
World Scientific
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Ministere du Travail et de la Participation
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Pluto Journals
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
CLOCKSS Archive
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Annual Reviews
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SciELO
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Brill
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institut francais des relations internationales (IFRI)
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
AOSIS
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Duke University Press
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
L'Harmattan
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
BMJ
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
York University Libraries
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Intellect
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Economic Association
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOS Press
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
School of Economics and Business in Sarajevo
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOP Publishing
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editions Ophrys
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Thomas Telford
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EJournal Publishing
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Accounting Association
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit, Instituut voor Culturele en Sociale Antropologie, University Of Nijmegen
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Delachaux et Niestle
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Unisa Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Instituto Universitario de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centro de estudos sociais
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Australian Society for the Study of Labour History
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PERSEE Program
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of California Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
MIT Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Martin Media
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Index Copernicus
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society of Comparative Law
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Sirey
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Asian Studies at the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
University of Warwick
69 publications, 3.39%
|
|
Cardiff University
47 publications, 2.31%
|
|
University of Nottingham
45 publications, 2.21%
|
|
University of Leeds
38 publications, 1.86%
|
|
University of Manchester
34 publications, 1.67%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
33 publications, 1.62%
|
|
University of Sheffield
31 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University of Bradford
29 publications, 1.42%
|
|
University of Glasgow
28 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Cambridge
26 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
25 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Leicester
24 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Birmingham
22 publications, 1.08%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
20 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Stirling
19 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Lancaster University
18 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Bath
18 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Oxford
17 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University College Dublin
17 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
16 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Loughborough University
16 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
15 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Keele University
15 publications, 0.74%
|
|
De Montfort University
15 publications, 0.74%
|
|
King's College London
14 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
13 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of the West of England
13 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Aston University
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Salford
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Ege University
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Durham University
10 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Liverpool
10 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Cornell University
10 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Newcastle University
10 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
10 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Greenwich
10 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Aalborg University
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Monash University
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Griffith University
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Hull
9 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Sydney
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Western Australia
8 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University College London
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Melbourne
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Konstanz
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
7 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Southampton
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Bristol
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Swansea University
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Sussex
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Westminster
6 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Massey University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Macquarie University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
McMaster University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Ulster
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Linköping University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of New South Wales
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Imperial College London
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Kingston University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Auckland
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Wollongong
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of St Andrews
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Vienna
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Plymouth
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
London Metropolitan University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Heriot-Watt University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Ghent University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Stockholm University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Bologna
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Glasgow Caledonian University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Waikato
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Curtin University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Harvard University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Dublin City University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Trier University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Northumbria University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
York University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Toronto
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Reading
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Oviedo
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Surrey
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Cardiff University
14 publications, 9.4%
|
|
University College Dublin
7 publications, 4.7%
|
|
University of Manchester
5 publications, 3.36%
|
|
Newcastle University
5 publications, 3.36%
|
|
Durham University
4 publications, 2.68%
|
|
University of Warwick
4 publications, 2.68%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 2.68%
|
|
University of Birmingham
4 publications, 2.68%
|
|
University of Glasgow
4 publications, 2.68%
|
|
University of Leeds
4 publications, 2.68%
|
|
University of Sheffield
4 publications, 2.68%
|
|
University of Leicester
4 publications, 2.68%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
University of Nottingham
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
University of Sydney
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
University of Western Australia
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
De Montfort University
3 publications, 2.01%
|
|
Yalova University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Linnaeus University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Aston University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Loughborough University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Waikato
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Bristol
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Keele University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Northumbria University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Carleton University
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Greenwich
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Windsor
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Westminster
2 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Gaziantep University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Tübingen
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Liège
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Linköping University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Stockholm School of Economics
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Renmin University of China
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Aalborg University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Bergen
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Maastricht University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Sorbonne University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Kore University of Enna
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
European University Institute
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Auckland
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Monash University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Griffith University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Curtin University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of South Australia
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Flinders University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
DePaul University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Panteion University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Dublin City University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Piraeus
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of the West of England
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Wayne State University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of St Andrews
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Michigan
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Dartmouth College
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Konstanz
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Kassel
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Trier University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Kiel University
1 publication, 0.67%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 796, 39.06%
United Kingdom
796 publications, 39.06%
|
USA
|
USA, 121, 5.94%
USA
121 publications, 5.94%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 59, 2.89%
Australia
59 publications, 2.89%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 58, 2.85%
Germany
58 publications, 2.85%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 52, 2.55%
Italy
52 publications, 2.55%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 46, 2.26%
Canada
46 publications, 2.26%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 44, 2.16%
Ireland
44 publications, 2.16%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 23, 1.13%
Turkey
23 publications, 1.13%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 19, 0.93%
Denmark
19 publications, 0.93%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 19, 0.93%
New Zealand
19 publications, 0.93%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 18, 0.88%
Sweden
18 publications, 0.88%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 17, 0.83%
Belgium
17 publications, 0.83%
|
China
|
China, 13, 0.64%
China
13 publications, 0.64%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 13, 0.64%
Netherlands
13 publications, 0.64%
|
France
|
France, 12, 0.59%
France
12 publications, 0.59%
|
India
|
India, 11, 0.54%
India
11 publications, 0.54%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 0.34%
Spain
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 7, 0.34%
Norway
7 publications, 0.34%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 7, 0.34%
South Africa
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 6, 0.29%
Russia
6 publications, 0.29%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 0.25%
Austria
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.25%
Greece
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 5, 0.25%
Israel
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 5, 0.25%
Iraq
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.2%
Poland
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 0.2%
Japan
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 0.15%
Nigeria
3 publications, 0.15%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.15%
UAE
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 0.15%
Finland
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.1%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.1%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.1%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.1%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.1%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.1%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.05%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.05%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.05%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.05%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Maldives
|
Maldives, 1, 0.05%
Maldives
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.05%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.05%
Panama
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.05%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.05%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.05%
Romania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.05%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 1, 0.05%
Fiji
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.05%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (18 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 66, 44.3%
United Kingdom
66 publications, 44.3%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 15, 10.07%
Germany
15 publications, 10.07%
|
USA
|
USA, 15, 10.07%
USA
15 publications, 10.07%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 12, 8.05%
Canada
12 publications, 8.05%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 7.38%
Ireland
11 publications, 7.38%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 10, 6.71%
Australia
10 publications, 6.71%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 6, 4.03%
New Zealand
6 publications, 4.03%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 3.36%
Sweden
5 publications, 3.36%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 2.68%
Belgium
4 publications, 2.68%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 4, 2.68%
Italy
4 publications, 2.68%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 2.68%
Turkey
4 publications, 2.68%
|
France
|
France, 3, 2.01%
France
3 publications, 2.01%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 2.01%
Netherlands
3 publications, 2.01%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 2.01%
Norway
3 publications, 2.01%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 2.01%
Poland
3 publications, 2.01%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 1.34%
Greece
2 publications, 1.34%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 1.34%
Denmark
2 publications, 1.34%
|
India
|
India, 2, 1.34%
India
2 publications, 1.34%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.67%
China
1 publication, 0.67%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.67%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.67%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.67%
Spain
1 publication, 0.67%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.67%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.67%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.67%
Japan
1 publication, 0.67%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|