Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
6.1
SJR
2.106
CiteScore
14.9
Categories
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Global and Planetary Change
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Environmental Science
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2012-2025
journal names
Ecosystem Services
ECOSYST SERV
Top-3 citing journals

Ecosystem Services
(7901 citations)

Sustainability
(3707 citations)

Ecological Indicators
(3276 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Wageningen University and Research Centre
(74 publications)

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
(51 publications)

Australian National University
(37 publications)

Wageningen University and Research Centre
(26 publications)

Australian National University
(13 publications)

Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
(13 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 941
Q2

Rhinitis in the Geriatric Population: Epidemiological and Cytological Aspects
Gelardi M., Giancaspro R., Boni E., Di Gioacchino M., Cintoli G., Cassano M., Ventura M.T.
Allergic rhinitis (AR), traditionally considered as a childhood condition, is increasingly recognized among older adults, driven by rising life expectancy and environmental factors. Although allergic sensitization declines with age, AR prevalence in the elderly is underestimated, with 3–12% of geriatric patients affected. Diagnosis is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and overlapping conditions, leading to underdiagnosis and inadequate treatment. AR significantly impacts the quality of life (QoL), often exacerbating respiratory comorbidities like asthma and COPD. Presbynasalis, encompassing age-related sinonasal changes, includes reduced allergic responses, increased chronic rhinosinusitis, altered nasal structure, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Non-allergic rhinitis, atrophic rhinitis, and overlapping rhinitis further complicate AR diagnosis in the elderly. Effective management involves personalized pharmacotherapy, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), and addressing comorbidities and polypharmacy risks. Despite safety concerns, recent studies demonstrate AIT efficacy in elderly patients, reducing symptoms and medication use. Given AR’s impact on cognitive and respiratory health, accurate diagnosis and treatment can enhance QoL and mitigate health decline. Greater awareness and further research are essential to understand AR prevalence and improve outcomes for geriatric patients.
Q2

Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Posture Identification Model of Older Adults: From Silhouette of Sagittal Photographs
Sugiyama N., Kai Y., Koda H., Morihara T., Kida N.
Background/Objectives: Posture is a significant indicator of health status in older adults. This study aimed to develop an automatic posture assessment tool based on sagittal photographs by validating recognition models using convolutional neural networks. Methods: A total of 9140 images were collected with data augmentation, and each image was labeled as either Ideal or Non-Ideal posture by physical therapists. The hidden and output layers of the models remained unchanged, while the loss function and optimizer were varied to construct four different model configurations: mean squared error and Adam (MSE & Adam), mean squared error and stochastic gradient descent (MSE & SGD), binary cross-entropy and Adam (BCE & Adam), and binary cross-entropy and stochastic gradient descent (BCE & SGD). Results: All four models demonstrated an improved accuracy in both the training and validation phases. However, the two BCE models exhibited divergence in validation loss, suggesting overfitting. Conversely, the two MSE models showed stability during learning. Therefore, we focused on the MSE models and evaluated their reliability using sensitivity, specificity, and Prevalence-Adjusted Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) based on the model’s output and correct label. Sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 84% for MSE & Adam and 67% and 77% for MSE & SGD, respectively. Moreover, PABAK values for agreement with the correct label were 0.69 and 0.43 for MSE & Adam and MSE & SGD, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the MSE & Adam model, in particular, can serve as a useful tool for screening inspections.
Q2

Comprehensive Geriatric Health Assessment Core Competencies and Skills for Primary Care Nurses: A Scoping Review
Dimitriadou I., Sini E., Šteinmiller J., Saridi M., Lundberg A., Häger M., Hjaltadottir I., Skuladottir S.S., Korsström N., Mört S., Tuori H., Fradelos E.C.
Objective: This scoping review aims to explore and synthesize the core competencies and skills required for primary care nurses conducting comprehensive geriatric assessments. Comprehensive geriatric assessments have become integral to providing holistic, patient-centered care for older adults with complex health needs, but the specific competencies required in primary care remain underresearched. Design: The review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework, incorporating studies from PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. A comprehensive search was conducted from May 2014 to May 2024, and a population–concept–context (PCC) framework was used to identify relevant studies. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing six key competency domains for nurses involved in comprehensive geriatric assessments: Clinical Assessment and Diagnostic Competencies, Care Planning and Coordination, Professional and Interpersonal Competencies, Environmental and Systemic Competencies, Technical and Procedural Competencies, and Quality Improvement and Evidence-Based Practice. These competencies are essential for providing high-quality care to older adults and supporting integrated, multidisciplinary approaches to geriatric care. Conclusions: The identified competency domains provide a structured framework that can enhance primary care nurses’ ability to deliver more effective, individualized, and coordinated care to older adults. However, the standardization of these competencies remains crucial for ensuring consistency in practice.
Q2

Aging-Related Changes in Bimanual Coordination as a Screening Tool for Healthy Aging
Shizuka Y., Murata S., Goda A., Sawai S., Fujikawa S., Yamamoto R., Maru T., Nakagawa K., Nakano H.
Background/Objectives: The steady increase in the global older adult population highlights critical challenges, including the development of preventive strategies to extend healthy life expectancy and support independence in activities of daily living. Although there is an aging-related reduction in manual dexterity, the difference in bimanual coordination performance between young and older adults remains unclear. We aimed to elucidate the characteristics of bimanual coordination among young, young-old, and old-old adult participants. Methods: The participants performed in-phase (tapping the thumb and index finger together as fast as possible) and anti-phase (alternating movement between the left and right fingers) bimanual coordination tasks, and intergroup comparison of the task parameters was performed. The receiver operating characteristic curve was also conducted to calculate age cut-off points for bimanual coordination. Results: The number and frequency of taps significantly decreased sequentially in young, young-old, and old-old adults, whereas the average of tap interval significantly increased in this order (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the young-old and old-old groups in the average local maximum distance (p > 0.05). These findings indicate that bimanual coordination task performance varies depending on specific parameters. Furthermore, the age cut-off points for bimanual coordination were determined as 68.5 years for the right-hand number of taps (AUC = 0.73) in the anti-phase task, 73.5 years for the right-hand average of tapping interval (AUC = 0.72) in the anti-phase task, and 65.5 years for the left-hand frequency of taps (AUC = 0.72) of the anti-phase task. Conclusions: the number of taps, average of tapping interval, and frequency of taps are potential indicators of aging-related changes in bimanual coordination.
Q2

Establishment of a Mandarin Chinese Version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 and Exploration of the Association Between Oral Frailty and Sarcopenia
Yang C., Chen H., Iijima K., Tanaka T., Dai C., Yu S., Chuang H.
Objective: The aim of our study was to introduce a Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty assessment and explore the relationship between oral frailty and sarcopenia. A total of 409 elders (171 male, 238 female) participated in surveys using the Mandarin Chinese version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8) in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Method: The translation of the Mandarin Chinese version of OFI-8 adhered to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) reporting guidelines. The eight-item questionnaire assessed tooth status, oral function, and other subjective measures. Additionally, sarcopenia was evaluated using the SARC-F questionnaire. Result: Among the participants, 195 participants were classified as non-oral frailty and 214 participants were oral frailty. Significant differences were observed in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), education level, and scores on the SARC-F questionnaire between the non-oral frailty and oral frailty populations. In logistic regression model, oral frailty showed a significant and positive association with the SARC-F score (adjusted odds ratio 2.130, 95% confidence interval 1.580–2.872, p-value < 0.001), even after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and education level. Conclusion: This study has developed a valuable Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty screening questionnaire, the OFI-8. Oral frailty is significantly and positively associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia, particularly among the elderly, males, and those with lower education levels. This measure proves to be practical for assessing oral health status in the Chinese community, promoting oral frailty research within the Mandarin Chinese population, and addressing the challenges associated with defining oral frailty in future studies.
Q2

Prevalence of Poor Diet Quality and Associated Factors Among Older Adults from the Bagé Cohort Study of Ageing, Brazil (SIGa-Bagé)
Valério T.D., Neves R.G., Thumé E., Machado K.P., Tomasi E.
(1) Background: The accelerated aging of the population raises concerns about the diet of older adults due to its relationship with health and quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of poor diet quality and its association with sociodemographic factors and health status among older adults residing in the city of Bagé, located in southern Brazil; (2) Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the 2016/2017 follow-up of the Bagé Aging Cohort Study (SIGa-Bagé). Diet quality was assessed using the Elderly Diet Quality Index. Descriptive analysis and Poisson regression with robust variance adjustment, based on hierarchical levels, were used to calculate crude and adjusted prevalence ratios with their respective 95% confidence intervals; (3) Results: The sample included 728 older adults (65.7% female; mean age: 77.2 years). Poor diet quality was observed in 41.5% of participants. After adjustment, male sex, black or brown skin color, absence of multimorbidity, and presence of depressive symptoms were significantly associated with poor diet quality; (4) Conclusions: The findings highlight the most vulnerable groups and the need for investments in strategies to promote mental health and healthy eating habits among the older adults, particularly among men and racial minority groups.
Q2

Impact of an Interprofessional Collaboration Between Physicians and Pharmacists on Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs in Older Patients with Trauma in the Emergency Department
Hellinger B.J., Gries A., Bertsche T., Remane Y.
Background/Objectives: In older patients, falls constitute a significant public health concern and a major cause of hospital admission. Fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) represent a key risk factor for falls. Therefore, modifying these drugs represents an important strategy for preventing recurrent falls and further patient harm. The objective of this study was to evaluate a structured interprofessional collaboration between physicians and pharmacists on managing FRIDs in older patients who present to the emergency department (ED) after a fall. Methods: This study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care hospital. Patients who were >65 years old and presented to the ED after a fall were included. A routine care group was included between 1 March 2020 and 31 May 2020. A pharmaceutical care group was included between 1 September 2023 and 30 November 2023. In the pharmaceutical care group, a clinical pharmacist supported the physicians in identifying and managing FRIDs. Possible solutions for improving FRID prescription were discussed interprofessionally. The number of FRIDs at ED admission and discharge, as well as the number of FRID modifications, were evaluated. Results: A total of 107 patients were enrolled in each group. There were 85 patients in the routine care group and 89 patients in the pharmaceutical care group, with at least 1 FRID prescribed at ED admission (p = 0.483). At ED discharge, there were 85 patients in the routine care group and 68 patients in the pharmaceutical care group, with at least 1 FRID prescribed at (p = 0.010). There were seven FRID modifications in the routine care group compared to 125 FRID modifications in the pharmaceutical care group. Conclusions: In this study, the interprofessional collaboration between physicians and pharmacists led to a reduced number of FRIDs being prescribed and more FRID modifications in older patients at ED discharge. Further research is required to ascertain the feasibility of integrating this single intervention into a multifactorial fall prevention program.
Q2

Anemia in Elderly Patients: Contribution of Renal Aging and Chronic Kidney Disease
Santos S., Lousa I., Carvalho M., Sameiro-Faria M., Santos-Silva A., Belo L.
Renal aging is a physiological process characterized by structural and functional changes in the kidneys. The presence of disorders or pathologies can exacerbate these age-related changes, potentially leading to organ dysfunction. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), a significant global public health issue, is particularly prevalent in the elderly and is often associated with the age-related decline in kidney function. Anemia is one of the most frequent complications of CKD and is also highly prevalent in the elderly. Mild anemia, often multifactorial, is the most common presentation. Understanding the mechanisms driving anemia in this population is crucial to ensure appropriate treatment. The primary etiologies include nutritional deficiency, anemia of unknown cause, and anemia of chronic diseases, including CKD. This review provides an in-depth exploration of the complex pathophysiological mechanisms underlying anemia in elderly patients with CKD.
Q2

Case Report: Weakness and Recurrent Falls in an Older Patient
Galloway M., Hoffman N., Bray C.L., Ebrahim A., Puebla B., Ritchie D.
Background/Objectives: Lower-extremity weakness in older adults is often overlooked, yet it can have reversible or medical causes that contribute to increased falls. Common factors include vision disturbances, impaired balance due to otolith dysfunction, arthritis-related immobility, and lower-extremity neuropathy. This case presents a unique diagnostic challenge in evaluating bilateral lower-extremity weakness and recurrent falls in an older adult, highlighting the complexity of diagnosing conditions with overlapping symptoms. Case Presentation: The patient, a woman with a history of a neuroendocrine tumor, experienced progressive weakness in her lower extremities, along with oculomotor and facial muscle involvement, despite extensive testing. Key clinical findings included elevated protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid, suggesting the possibility of an infectious or autoimmune process. A thorough investigation was conducted, including testing for both common and rare conditions such as Guillain–Barré syndrome, Lyme disease, and tuberculosis. Results: Despite comprehensive diagnostic efforts, no clear etiology was identified. The patient’s condition was eventually considered to be related to carcinomatosis meningoencephalitis, a rare complication from a previous cancer diagnosis. Given the progressive nature of her symptoms and lack of treatment options, she was transitioned to palliative care. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of a comprehensive differential diagnosis in older patients with unexplained weakness and falls. Rare neurological conditions should not be overlooked, even when more common causes are suspected. Clinicians should remain aware that falls and weakness in older adults may stem from various pathologies, some of which are reversible if identified early, and rare causes must always be considered when standard treatments fail.
Q2

Cognitive Performance Among Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline
López-Higes R., Rubio-Valdehita S., López-Sanz D., Fernandes S.M., Rodrigues P.F., Delgado-Losada M.L.
Objectives: The main objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate if there are significant differences in cognition between a group of older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and cognitively intact controls. Methods: An initial sample of 132 older people underwent an extensive neuropsychological evaluation (memory, executive functions, and language) and were classified according to diagnostic criteria. Two groups of 33 subjects each, controls and SCD, were formed using an a priori case-matching procedures in different variables: age, biological sex, years of education, cognitive reserve, and Mini-Mental State Exam. Results: The mean age and standard deviation in the control group were equal to 70.39 ± 4.31 years, while in the SCD group, they were 70.30 ± 4.33 years. The number of males (n = 9) and females (n = 24) was equal in both groups; the means of years of education were also quite similar. SCD participants have a significantly lower mood than the controls. Significant differences between groups were obtained in delayed recall, inhibitory control, and comprehension of sentences not fitted to canonical word order in Spanish. A logistic regression revealed that a lower score on the Stroop’s interference condition is associated with a higher likelihood of having SCD. Finally, ROC analysis provided a model that performs better than random chance, and a cut-off score in Stroop’s interference condition equal to 49 was suggested for clinically differentiating the two groups. Conclusions: This study highlights that, compared to a matched control group, participants with SCD showed subtle but significant neuropsychological differences.
Q2

Effect of Protein Supplementation on Orthostatic Hypotension in Older Adult Patients with Heart Failure
Azhar G., Pangle A.K., Coker K., Sharma S., Wei J.Y.
Purpose: Heart failure (HF) impairs physical performance and increases the incidence of orthostatic hypotension (OH). Individuals with OH have a higher risk of falls, which are a major source of morbidity and mortality in older adults. Dietary protein supplementation can improve physical performance in healthy older adult individuals; however, its effect on OH in older adult patients with HF is unknown. Methods: Twenty-one older adult patients with mild-to-moderate HF were randomized to placebo or protein supplementation. Dietary protein was supplemented with whey protein so the total protein intake for each participant was 1.2 g/kg bodyweight/day, plus 1 g/day of the amino acid l-carnitine for 16 weeks. Susceptibility to OH was assessed using a head-up tilt test, blood markers, and a functional test (6 min walk) at baseline and 16 weeks. Results: There were no differences in tilt test responses or 6 min walk test (6MWT) distances. The protein-supplement group had a significant increase in 6MWT pulse pressures post-walk after 16 weeks of treatment as compared to placebo. However, the tachycardia observed at baseline after 6MWT in the protein group was not seen at the end of the study. There was also a trend towards lower levels of brain naturetic peptide (proBNP) in the protein group vs. placebo at 16 weeks. Conclusions: The improved pulse-pressure response to exertion and positive trends in proBNP in this pilot study suggest that dietary supplementation may improve cardiovascular function and general health in individuals with HF and that larger future studies are justifiable.
Q2

Assessing Frailty in the Older: The Role of Bite Force as an Independent Indicator
Ferreira L.M., Brito J., da Silva J.R., da Silva M.L., Fischel e Andrade M.E., Júdice A., Mendes J.J., Machado V., Botelho J.T., Regalo S.C.
Background: This study investigates the relationship between bite force and grip strength as indicators of frailty in older adults. Frailty syndrome, characterized by increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, poses significant challenges in geriatric care. Objectives: This research builds on previous findings linking oral health to frailty risk, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Methods: A total of 59 older participants, aged 60 years and older, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study conducted at the Egas Moniz School of Health and Science. The participants underwent assessments of bite force using an electric dynamometer and grip strength using a specialized device. Body composition was also measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Results: Statistical analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between bite force and grip strength, even after adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI). Age was significantly correlated with bite and grip force (p < 0.05), while BMI was correlated only with handgrip force but not with bite force (coefficient = −0.047, p = 0.737). Notably, bite force was found to be independent of BMI, unlike grip strength, which is generally influenced by body composition. This independence highlights the potential of bite force as a reliable and distinct marker for frailty that is not confounded by BMI-related factors. This study highlights the importance of oral health in maintaining overall well-being in older adults. Reduced bite force may indicate an increased risk of frailty, which can lead to malnutrition and decreased quality of life. These findings suggest that integrating bite force measurements into clinical assessments may improve the assessment of frailty and inform interventions aimed at improving health outcomes in the older population. Conclusions: This research provides new insights into the association between bite force and grip strength, emphasizing the unique value of bite force as an independent marker of frailty. It advocates for further studies to explore its role in geriatric care strategies.
Q2

Validation of the Italian Version of the Rapid Geriatric Assessment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Tacchino C., Carmisciano L., Page E., Ottaviani S., Tagliafico L., Boccini A., Signori A., Giannotti C., Nencioni A., Monacelli F.
Background/Objectives: The Rapid Geriatric Assessment (RGA) is a tool designed to screen for frailty, sarcopenia, anorexia related to aging, and cognitive impairment. This study aimed to translate and validate the RGA for use among Italian community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This cross-cultural study involved 100 community-dwelling older adults randomly recruited through convenience sampling from general practitioner offices in Genoa (Italy), between January and June 2019. The RGA includes the Simple FRAIL Questionnaire Screening Tool, SARC-F Screening for Sarcopenia, Simplified Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), and Rapid Cognitive Screening (RCS). These were validated against gold-standard tools: the Abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (aCGA) and Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI). Additional assessments included the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Handgrip test. The validation process included forward–backward translation, synthesis, and consensus by independent reviewers. Psychometric properties, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), and validity correlations were analyzed. Results: The RGA demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, with internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.59) and significant validity correlations (RGA and aCGA, rho = 0.34, p = 0.001; RGA and MPI, rho = 0.49, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed by significant correlations between specific subitems and reference measures: FRAIL with TUG (p < 0.05), SARC-F with Handgrip strength (p = 0.013), SNAQ with BMI, and RCS with MMSE (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The Italian version of the RGA is a reliable screening tool for geriatric syndromes in community-dwelling older adults. While it does not replace a CGA, the RGA may identify individuals who may benefit from further evaluation using a complete CGA.
Q2

Aging Gut-Brain Interactions: Pro-Inflammatory Gut Bacteria Are Elevated in Fecal Samples from Individuals Living with Alzheimer’s Dementia
Donaldson A.I., Fyfe C.L., Martin J.C., Smith E.E., Horgan G.W., Myint P.K., Johnstone A.M., Scott K.P.
Background/Objectives: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, characterized by an irreversible decline in cognitive function. The pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative disorders has been linked to changes in the gut microbiota, transmitted through the gut-brain axis. Methods: We set out to establish by case-control study methodology whether there were any differences in the composition and/or function of the gut microbiota between older resident adults in care homes with or without an AD diagnosis via analysis of the microbial composition from fecal samples. Results: The microbial composition, determined by 16S rRNA gene profiling, indicated that AD sufferers had significantly increased proportions of Escherichia/Shigella and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, and significantly decreased proportions of Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Blautia, and Roseburia species. The increase in potentially pro-inflammatory bacteria was consistent with slightly higher concentrations of calprotectin, a biomarker of gut inflammation. Fecal concentrations of most microbial metabolites measured were similar across groups, although participants with AD had significantly increased proportions of the branched-chain fatty acid, iso-butyrate, and lower overall concentrations of total short chain fatty acids. Conclusions: Participants with Alzheimer’s disease have several key differences within their gut microbiota profile, in contrast to care home residents without Alzheimer’s disease. The altered microbiome included both compositional and functional changes linked to poorer health and gut inflammation.
Q2

Health Professional Support for Friends and Family Members of Older People Discharged from Hospital After a Fracture: A Survey Study
Smith T.O., Arnold S., Baxter M.
Background/Objectives: Friends and family members of people who are discharged from hospital after a fracture often take on caring roles, since these patients have reduced independence during recovery. Previous literature suggests that these individuals are rarely supported in their adoption of these roles. No studies have previously explored the use of carer training interventions to support friends/family members by health professionals in this setting. This survey study aimed to address this. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among health professionals who treat people in hospital following fractures. Respondents were asked about the use of care training for friends/family members of people discharged from hospital after fracture, and whether a clinical trial would be useful to test such carer training interventions. Results: A total of 114 health professionals accessed the survey. Fifty respondents (44%) reported that carer training was not offered in their practice. When it was offered, respondents reported this was not consistently provided. Less than 12% of respondents reported offering carer training to most of their patients following a fracture. What was offered in these instances was largely based on education provision (69%), practical skills in exercise prescription (55%) and manual handling (51%). Ninety-eight percent of respondents reported that a clinical trial would be, or would potentially be, valuable to aid a change in practice to include carer training in routine clinical care. Conclusions: Carer training programmes are not routinely provided in clinical practice for people following a fracture. The results indicate that health professionals see a potential value in these programmes, but further research is recommended to provide an evidence base for these interventions.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
|
Ecosystem Services
7901 citations, 10.88%
|
|
Sustainability
3707 citations, 5.11%
|
|
Ecological Indicators
3276 citations, 4.51%
|
|
Land
2771 citations, 3.82%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
2311 citations, 3.18%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
1766 citations, 2.43%
|
|
Land Use Policy
1242 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1117 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Forests
1096 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Ecological Economics
994 citations, 1.37%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
811 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening
811 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Remote Sensing
713 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Landscape and Urban Planning
692 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
652 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Ocean and Coastal Management
564 citations, 0.78%
|
|
People and Nature
560 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Landscape Ecology
557 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Environmental Science and Policy
553 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Ecosystems and People
537 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Frontiers in Environmental Science
527 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
518 citations, 0.71%
|
|
PLoS ONE
448 citations, 0.62%
|
|
One Ecosystem
445 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Ambio
418 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Frontiers in Marine Science
412 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Marine Policy
389 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Sustainability Science
356 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
348 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Scientific Reports
317 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Environmental Management
316 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Applied Geography
309 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Forest Policy and Economics
303 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
274 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
272 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Ecological Modelling
249 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Global Ecology and Conservation
248 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Sustainable Cities and Society
232 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Heliyon
230 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Regional Environmental Change
226 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Environmental Research Letters
220 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Land Degradation and Development
219 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
193 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Biological Conservation
192 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal for Nature Conservation
189 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Global Environmental Change
174 citations, 0.24%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
159 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Urban Ecosystems
156 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Ecological Engineering
141 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Forest Ecology and Management
141 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
140 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
137 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
118 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Environmental Development
118 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
112 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
111 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cities
109 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
108 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
108 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Human Ecology
107 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Hydrology
105 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Ecological Informatics
103 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Geography and Sustainability
103 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
97 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Marine Pollution Bulletin
95 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
95 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Agricultural Systems
94 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
92 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Geographical Sciences
92 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Trees Forests and People
92 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Diversity
91 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
90 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Applied Ecology
90 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Agronomy
90 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Catena
84 citations, 0.12%
|
|
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
84 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Biodiversity and Conservation
83 citations, 0.11%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
83 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Restoration Ecology
82 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals
82 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
79 citations, 0.11%
|
|
One Earth
78 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Environmental Challenges
77 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Ecological Urbanism of Yoruba Cities in Nigeria
75 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Wetlands
71 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Mountain Science
71 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Conservation Biology
70 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Environmental Research
70 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Habitat International
69 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management
69 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Global Change Biology
65 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Resources
65 citations, 0.09%
|
|
PeerJ
64 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
64 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Society and Natural Resources
63 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Nature Sustainability
63 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Energies
59 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Regional Studies in Marine Science
58 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Sustainable Production and Consumption
58 citations, 0.08%
|
|
World Development
58 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
|
Elsevier
32334 citations, 44.54%
|
|
MDPI
11507 citations, 15.85%
|
|
Springer Nature
10138 citations, 13.96%
|
|
Wiley
3761 citations, 5.18%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3034 citations, 4.18%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2031 citations, 2.8%
|
|
IOP Publishing
626 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
622 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
581 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
542 citations, 0.75%
|
|
SAGE
426 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Oxford University Press
398 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Emerald
245 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
234 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
170 citations, 0.23%
|
|
IGI Global
167 citations, 0.23%
|
|
EDP Sciences
164 citations, 0.23%
|
|
SciELO
138 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
131 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IWA Publishing
130 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
130 citations, 0.18%
|
|
The Royal Society
119 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Copernicus
105 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
100 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
100 citations, 0.14%
|
|
PeerJ
85 citations, 0.12%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
79 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
78 citations, 0.11%
|
|
OpenEdition
78 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IntechOpen
77 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
77 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
65 citations, 0.09%
|
|
World Scientific
63 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
57 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Annual Reviews
55 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
51 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
46 citations, 0.06%
|
|
International Association for Landscape Ecology, Chapter Germany (IALE-D)
41 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Journal of Natural Resources
40 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
38 citations, 0.05%
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
36 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
35 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
35 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academy of Science of South Africa
34 citations, 0.05%
|
|
CAIRN
34 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
33 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
31 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
30 citations, 0.04%
|
|
White Horse Press
27 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
AIP Publishing
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
23 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AOSIS
23 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Brazilian Association for Ecological Science and Conservation
21 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of California Press
19 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Mountain Society (IMS) and United Nations University
19 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Higher Education Press
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Berghahn Books
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
16 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Italian Society of Sivilculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF)
16 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOS Press
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Thomas Telford
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Geological Society of London
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Russian Geographical Society
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation and China Water and Power Press
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editora Champagnat
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Soil Science Society of America
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ecological Society of China
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
F1000 Research
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Center for Western Studies
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Surey Beatty & Sons
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Cogitatio
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Coastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc.
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Science in China Press
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hans Publishers
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Natural Areas Journal
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Commonwealth Forestry Association
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Biological Information Infrastructure
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
74 publications, 4.49%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
51 publications, 3.09%
|
|
Australian National University
37 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
34 publications, 2.06%
|
|
University of Queensland
32 publications, 1.94%
|
|
Finnish Environment Institute
31 publications, 1.88%
|
|
Stockholm University
30 publications, 1.82%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
28 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
26 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
23 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
22 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
22 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
21 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Haifa
21 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
21 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Helsinki
20 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
20 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of Leeds
20 publications, 1.21%
|
|
ETH Zurich
19 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Cambridge
19 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
19 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Center for International Forestry Research Indonesia
18 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Southampton
18 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
18 publications, 1.09%
|
|
James Cook University
18 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
18 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
18 publications, 1.09%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
18 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Colorado State University
17 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
17 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
17 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of York
17 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
16 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Melbourne
16 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Stanford University
16 publications, 0.97%
|
|
AgroParisTech
16 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
15 publications, 0.91%
|
|
King's College London
15 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Minnesota
15 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Tokyo
15 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of East Anglia
15 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Oxford
14 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Pretoria
14 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of the West of England
14 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Leuphana University of Lüneburg
14 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Twente
13 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Antwerp
13 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Cape Town
13 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Utrecht University
13 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Lund University
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Zurich
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Aarhus University
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Griffith University
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of British Columbia
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Florida
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Bangor University
12 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Peking University
11 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Ghent University
11 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University College London
11 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Charles Darwin University
11 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
11 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Göttingen
11 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Kiel University
11 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Porto
11 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
11 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Lisbon
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Padua
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
National University of Singapore
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Trento
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Rhodes University
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Nelson Mandela University
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Centre for Ecological Research
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Exeter
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University College Dublin
10 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Liège
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Imperial College London
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Duke University
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Austral University of Chile
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Klagenfurt
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
United Nations University
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Cranfield University
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
9 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
8 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Basque Foundation for Science
8 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Bayreuth
8 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Bern
8 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Michigan State University
8 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
8 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Charles University
8 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Adelaide
8 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
26 publications, 4.11%
|
|
Australian National University
13 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
13 publications, 2.06%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
13 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
12 publications, 1.9%
|
|
University of Haifa
11 publications, 1.74%
|
|
Stockholm University
11 publications, 1.74%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
11 publications, 1.74%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
10 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
10 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Peking University
9 publications, 1.42%
|
|
University College London
9 publications, 1.42%
|
|
ETH Zurich
8 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Melbourne
8 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
8 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Porto
8 publications, 1.27%
|
|
AgroParisTech
8 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
8 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
7 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Twente
7 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Lisbon
7 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Finnish Environment Institute
7 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Queensland
7 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
7 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Minnesota
7 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Granada
7 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
7 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Liège
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Helsinki
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Cape Town
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Colorado State University
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Utrecht University
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Leuphana University of Lüneburg
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Exeter
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
6 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Ghent University
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Zurich
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Bern
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Padua
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Southampton
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Charles University
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
James Cook University
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Stanford University
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Nelson Mandela University
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Iceland
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Mississippi State University
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of York
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University College Dublin
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Plymouth
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Université du Québec en Outaouais
5 publications, 0.79%
|
|
China Agricultural University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Cambridge
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Sorbonne University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Michigan State University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Trento
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Deakin University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Tasmania
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Charles Darwin University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Duke University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
McGill University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Kassel
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Cranfield University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Tsinghua University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Zhejiang University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Basque Foundation for Science
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Lund University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Lorraine
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Lausanne
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Shaanxi Normal University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Aarhus University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
King's College London
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Glasgow
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Australian Research Council
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 285, 17.29%
USA
285 publications, 17.29%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 281, 17.05%
United Kingdom
281 publications, 17.05%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 218, 13.23%
Germany
218 publications, 13.23%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 161, 9.77%
Australia
161 publications, 9.77%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 156, 9.47%
Netherlands
156 publications, 9.47%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 133, 8.07%
Spain
133 publications, 8.07%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 115, 6.98%
Italy
115 publications, 6.98%
|
China
|
China, 112, 6.8%
China
112 publications, 6.8%
|
France
|
France, 93, 5.64%
France
93 publications, 5.64%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 75, 4.55%
Sweden
75 publications, 4.55%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 70, 4.25%
South Africa
70 publications, 4.25%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 66, 4%
Canada
66 publications, 4%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 62, 3.76%
Finland
62 publications, 3.76%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 60, 3.64%
Brazil
60 publications, 3.64%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 59, 3.58%
Belgium
59 publications, 3.58%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 56, 3.4%
Switzerland
56 publications, 3.4%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 50, 3.03%
Norway
50 publications, 3.03%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 48, 2.91%
Austria
48 publications, 2.91%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 44, 2.67%
Portugal
44 publications, 2.67%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 36, 2.18%
Japan
36 publications, 2.18%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 35, 2.12%
Denmark
35 publications, 2.12%
|
India
|
India, 35, 2.12%
India
35 publications, 2.12%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 34, 2.06%
Colombia
34 publications, 2.06%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 34, 2.06%
New Zealand
34 publications, 2.06%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 33, 2%
Mexico
33 publications, 2%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 32, 1.94%
Indonesia
32 publications, 1.94%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 30, 1.82%
Israel
30 publications, 1.82%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 29, 1.76%
Poland
29 publications, 1.76%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 27, 1.64%
Chile
27 publications, 1.64%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 23, 1.4%
Ireland
23 publications, 1.4%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 23, 1.4%
Kenya
23 publications, 1.4%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 21, 1.27%
Argentina
21 publications, 1.27%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 20, 1.21%
Czech Republic
20 publications, 1.21%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 18, 1.09%
Vietnam
18 publications, 1.09%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 18, 1.09%
Singapore
18 publications, 1.09%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 16, 0.97%
Hungary
16 publications, 0.97%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 14, 0.85%
Nepal
14 publications, 0.85%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 13, 0.79%
Romania
13 publications, 0.79%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 12, 0.73%
Slovakia
12 publications, 0.73%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 11, 0.67%
Turkey
11 publications, 0.67%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 10, 0.61%
Costa Rica
10 publications, 0.61%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 9, 0.55%
Greece
9 publications, 0.55%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 9, 0.55%
Peru
9 publications, 0.55%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 9, 0.55%
Ecuador
9 publications, 0.55%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 8, 0.49%
Bulgaria
8 publications, 0.49%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 8, 0.49%
Ethiopia
8 publications, 0.49%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 7, 0.42%
Iceland
7 publications, 0.42%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 7, 0.42%
Luxembourg
7 publications, 0.42%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 0.42%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 0.42%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 7, 0.42%
Tanzania
7 publications, 0.42%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 6, 0.36%
Bolivia
6 publications, 0.36%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 6, 0.36%
Thailand
6 publications, 0.36%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 6, 0.36%
Philippines
6 publications, 0.36%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 5, 0.3%
Ghana
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 0.24%
Estonia
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 0.24%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 4, 0.24%
Lithuania
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 4, 0.24%
Madagascar
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.24%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 0.24%
Nigeria
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 4, 0.24%
Trinidad and Tobago
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 4, 0.24%
Uruguay
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 4, 0.24%
Sri Lanka
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 3, 0.18%
Botswana
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 3, 0.18%
Guatemala
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.18%
Iran
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 3, 0.18%
Cambodia
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 3, 0.18%
Laos
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 3, 0.18%
Myanmar
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.18%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 2, 0.12%
Barbados
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Bhutan
|
Bhutan, 2, 0.12%
Bhutan
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 2, 0.12%
Zambia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 2, 0.12%
Cameroon
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.12%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.12%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.12%
Malta
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 2, 0.12%
Mozambique
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 2, 0.12%
Namibia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 2, 0.12%
New Caledonia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 2, 0.12%
Panama
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Paraguay
|
Paraguay, 2, 0.12%
Paraguay
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Suriname
|
Suriname, 2, 0.12%
Suriname
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Eswatini
|
Eswatini, 2, 0.12%
Eswatini
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 2, 0.12%
Jamaica
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.06%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.06%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.06%
Benin
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Bermuda
|
Bermuda, 1, 0.06%
Bermuda
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.06%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Burundi
|
Burundi, 1, 0.06%
Burundi
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Guyana
|
Guyana, 1, 0.06%
Guyana
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Guinea
|
Guinea, 1, 0.06%
Guinea
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Grenada
|
Grenada, 1, 0.06%
Grenada
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.06%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 1, 0.06%
Dominican Republic
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.06%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.06%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.06%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.06%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
USA
|
USA, 83, 13.13%
USA
83 publications, 13.13%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 83, 13.13%
United Kingdom
83 publications, 13.13%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 78, 12.34%
Germany
78 publications, 12.34%
|
China
|
China, 62, 9.81%
China
62 publications, 9.81%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 62, 9.81%
Spain
62 publications, 9.81%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 52, 8.23%
Netherlands
52 publications, 8.23%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 49, 7.75%
Australia
49 publications, 7.75%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 44, 6.96%
Italy
44 publications, 6.96%
|
France
|
France, 38, 6.01%
France
38 publications, 6.01%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 27, 4.27%
Canada
27 publications, 4.27%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 27, 4.27%
Switzerland
27 publications, 4.27%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 26, 4.11%
Belgium
26 publications, 4.11%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 24, 3.8%
Brazil
24 publications, 3.8%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 24, 3.8%
Sweden
24 publications, 3.8%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 21, 3.32%
South Africa
21 publications, 3.32%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 20, 3.16%
Portugal
20 publications, 3.16%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 20, 3.16%
Austria
20 publications, 3.16%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 18, 2.85%
Poland
18 publications, 2.85%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 17, 2.69%
Finland
17 publications, 2.69%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 16, 2.53%
Israel
16 publications, 2.53%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 15, 2.37%
Japan
15 publications, 2.37%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 13, 2.06%
Norway
13 publications, 2.06%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 13, 2.06%
Czech Republic
13 publications, 2.06%
|
India
|
India, 12, 1.9%
India
12 publications, 1.9%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 12, 1.9%
Colombia
12 publications, 1.9%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 12, 1.9%
Mexico
12 publications, 1.9%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 1.74%
Ireland
11 publications, 1.74%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 9, 1.42%
Denmark
9 publications, 1.42%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 7, 1.11%
Argentina
7 publications, 1.11%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 7, 1.11%
New Zealand
7 publications, 1.11%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 7, 1.11%
Slovakia
7 publications, 1.11%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 7, 1.11%
Chile
7 publications, 1.11%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 6, 0.95%
Vietnam
6 publications, 0.95%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 6, 0.95%
Singapore
6 publications, 0.95%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 6, 0.95%
Turkey
6 publications, 0.95%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.79%
Greece
5 publications, 0.79%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 5, 0.79%
Iceland
5 publications, 0.79%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 5, 0.79%
Costa Rica
5 publications, 0.79%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 5, 0.79%
Ethiopia
5 publications, 0.79%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 4, 0.63%
Bulgaria
4 publications, 0.63%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 4, 0.63%
Hungary
4 publications, 0.63%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 4, 0.63%
Nepal
4 publications, 0.63%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 0.63%
Thailand
4 publications, 0.63%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 4, 0.63%
Ecuador
4 publications, 0.63%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 3, 0.47%
Estonia
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 3, 0.47%
Bolivia
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.47%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 3, 0.47%
Kenya
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 3, 0.47%
Lithuania
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 3, 0.47%
Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 3, 0.47%
Myanmar
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.47%
Peru
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.47%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.47%
Romania
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.32%
Iran
2 publications, 0.32%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.32%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.32%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 2, 0.32%
Madagascar
2 publications, 0.32%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.32%
Malta
2 publications, 0.32%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.32%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.32%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.16%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.16%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.16%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Burundi
|
Burundi, 1, 0.16%
Burundi
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Bhutan
|
Bhutan, 1, 0.16%
Bhutan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Guyana
|
Guyana, 1, 0.16%
Guyana
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.16%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.16%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Grenada
|
Grenada, 1, 0.16%
Grenada
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.16%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.16%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.16%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Lesotho
|
Lesotho, 1, 0.16%
Lesotho
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.16%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.16%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.16%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.16%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.16%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.16%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.16%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.16%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Suriname
|
Suriname, 1, 0.16%
Suriname
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.16%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.16%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.16%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Show all (54 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
1 profile journal article
Morera S.B.
10 publications,
107 citations
h-index: 6
1 profile journal article
YONARIZA -
🥼
33 publications,
81 citations
h-index: 5
1 profile journal article
Sheng Jichuan
🥼 🤝
65 publications,
1 446 citations
h-index: 19