Open Access
Case Reports in Endocrinology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q4
WOS
Q4
Impact factor
0.9
SJR
0.237
CiteScore
2.1
Categories
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Areas
Medicine
Years of issue
2013-2025
journal names
Case Reports in Endocrinology
CASE REP ENDOCRINOL
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
(10 publications)

Cleveland Clinic
(9 publications)
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
(9 publications)

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
(5 publications)

Kanagawa Cancer Center
(5 publications)

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
(4 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 277
Q1

Exploring the complexities of thesis writing in the distance mode: postgraduate students’ perspectives, challenges and strategies
Yunus M., Bachtiar B.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to explore the complexities faced by postgraduate students at Universitas Terbuka (UT) during their thesis writing process in a distance learning environment, focusing on their perspectives, challenges and strategies.Design/methodology/approachThe research employed a mixed-methods approach with a convergent parallel design, incorporating both quantitative data from 146 online questionnaire responses and qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with 16 students. This comprehensive methodology enabled a detailed examination of the students' experiences. The participants were from seven study programs in the Postgraduate Schools of UT.FindingsThe study identifies key themes impacting thesis writing in a distance learning context, including self-discipline, time management, access to resources, technological adaptation, feelings of isolation, motivation and supervisory interaction. The findings highlight the critical role of structured support systems, technological infrastructure and adaptive strategies such as online study groups and productivity tools in mitigating these challenges. Regular, constructive feedback from supervisors and the establishment of a supportive academic community are crucial for student success.Research limitations/implicationsThe research emphasizes the need for educational institutions to enhance their digital platforms and provide comprehensive training to bridge the gap in resource accessibility and technological proficiency. Further studies could expand on the specific needs of different demographic groups within the distance learning framework.Practical implicationsInstitutions should implement targeted interventions such as time management workshops, regular mentoring sessions, and the development of interactive and collaborative online platforms to support distance learners effectively.Social implicationsBy addressing the unique challenges of thesis writing in distance education, this study contributes to improving academic outcomes and enhancing the overall learning experience for postgraduate students, fostering a more inclusive and supportive educational environment.Originality/valueThis research provides valuable insights into the specific experiences of postgraduate students at UT, offering actionable recommendations for educators and policymakers to support thesis writing in distance learning contexts.
Q1

The antecedents of online teaching anxiety among university lecturers in Thailand: a mixed-methods investigation
Aba Shaar M.Y., Waluyo B., Rofiah N.L., Singhasuwan P., Tongumpa K.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThe study examined the antecedents of lecturers' online teaching anxiety and analyzed their relationships with variables such as gender, age, education, teaching experience and faculty.Design/methodology/approachUsing a mixed-methods design, the study involved 115 university lecturers through surveys and 15 through semi-structured interviews, with data analyzed via mixed-methods approaches.FindingsPersonal matters and digital literacy caused the lowest anxiety, teaching methods and classroom management triggered moderate anxiety, and teaching context and health factors provoked the highest. Female lecturers experienced greater health-related anxiety due to prolonged screen time. Education lecturers reported lower anxiety than science lecturers, whose laboratory-based content was harder to adapt to online teaching.Originality/valueLecturers' online teaching anxiety stemmed from six factors: digital literacy, teaching context, teaching methods, class management, health and personal matters. Institutional and social support have been identified as crucial for improving well-being and reducing anxiety.
Q1

The nexus between teacher trainees’ digital literacy and online learning motivation
Ahmed M.M., Sultana M., Md. Rokonuzzaman, Hossain M.K.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study examined the relationship between levels of digital literacy and the online learning motivation (OLM) of teacher trainees across various factors.Design/methodology/approachThis investigation utilized a quantitative research approach. The sample was selected through a purposive method and consisted of 485 teacher trainees from the School of Education at Bangladesh Open University (BOU). Participants' digital literacy and OLM were assessed using validated five-point Likert scale questionnaires, consisting of 17 items for digital literacy and six items for OLM. The collection of data was conducted via a cross-sectional survey. Descriptive analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis, t-test and ANOVA were employed for the purpose of data analysis.FindingsThe findings demonstrated that teacher trainees possessed sufficient digital literacy and OLM concerning the specified variables. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between digital literacy and OLM. BOU can evaluate all of these findings to make a rational decision regarding the development of its teacher education programs.Originality/valueThis exploratory study has yielded significant insights into the demographic characteristics, computer and internet skills, virtual learning skills and OLM of teacher trainees, thereby enhancing the existing body of knowledge in this field.
Q1

The efficacy of Telegram Messenger as a tool for enhancing argumentative writing among students in open and distance learning
Md Yusof N., Abdullah A.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis paper explores the effectiveness of using Telegram Messenger as a tool to enhance argumentative writing skills among open and distance learning (ODL) students. The paper outlines that argumentative writing is a crucial skill, particularly in written discourse, and that teaching it to ODL students presents unique challenges compared to traditional classroom settings.Design/methodology/approachThis quasi-experimental study was conducted on first-year ODL students in a Malaysian tertiary institution to measure the effectiveness of using Telegram Messenger to improve argumentative writing skills. The study used convenient sampling, with pre- and post-tests administered to both control and experimental groups, and the results were analyzed using paired sample t-tests. Additionally, qualitative data were gathered from six selected students, ensuring rigorous analysis and elimination of confounding variables by assigning the same writing tasks to all participants.FindingsThe findings of this paper suggest that students in the experimental group showed significant improvement in their argumentative writing skills, as evidenced by higher post-test scores compared to the control group. Qualitative feedback from selected students indicated that Telegram Messenger encouraged participation and made the writing process more engaging and interactive.Research limitations/implicationsThe study involved a relatively small sample size of 60 students from two cases and lasted only 10 weeks. Thus, the findings might not be generalizable to all ODL students. A longer study duration will provide findings on the long-term effects of using Telegram Messenger on argumentative writing skills. Factors such as age, educational background, language proficiency and prior experience in online learning could yield different results.Practical implicationsFor educators and institutions involved in online education, this research highlights the potential of integrating digital platforms like Telegram Messenger into their teaching strategies to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes, particularly in areas such as writing skills development. It also underscores the importance of adapting teaching methods to suit the unique needs and challenges of ODL students. Moreover, incorporating Telegram in ODL writing classrooms can foster a dynamic, interactive environment that supports both individual and collaborative learning.Social implicationsODL has become increasingly popular, especially with the rise of digital communication platforms. This study delves into how such platforms, like Telegram Messenger, can be utilized to enhance the learning experience for ODL students. By leveraging technology, educational opportunities can potentially be extended to individuals who may not have access to traditional classroom settings due to geographical, financial or other constraints.Originality/valueThe originality and value of this study lie in its focus on using Telegram Messenger, a widely accessible and familiar digital platform, to address the unique challenges ODL students face in developing argumentative writing skills in ODL. By employing a quasi-experimental design with both quantitative and qualitative analyses, the study provides robust evidence of Telegram’s effectiveness as a tool to improve engagement and writing outcomes, distinguishing it from traditional methods and other digital platforms that may lack the immediacy or interactivity Telegram offers.
Q1

Breaking the isolation: how influential is co-creation in open and distance learning on the use of new media?
Chakravarty R., Baruah A., Sarma N.N.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeIn the open and distance learning (ODL) system, widely scattered learners across various age groups often feel isolated. New-age media-enabled co-creation can help reduce this isolation. However, fostering collaborative academic engagement to break this isolation presents challenges for ODL institutions. Therefore, understanding the perceptions of the ODL teachers and learners on this issue is essential.Design/methodology/approachThe study adopted the triangulation method, collecting primary data from 198 learners at Krishna Kanta Handiqui State Open University (KKHSOU). A focus group discussion with members of the academic staff provided qualitative insights. The instrument consisted of 23 statement items and was statistically analyzed using factor analysis, one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests with SPSS version 26.0.FindingsCollaborative academic engagements were found to be significantly influenced by differences in the perceptions of learners across age groups towards the academic delivery process and new-age media platforms. Various dimensions like learner genuineness and effectiveness of support services also have implications for reducing isolation.Originality/valueThis study opens new avenues in the literature on co-creation and new-age media platforms in the context of ODL. This provides useful insights to educators on breaking isolation among the learners and involves them in the academic processes. The human approach as always will remain enduring.
Q1

Research on the transmission of the Open University of Japan courses via multi-device apps oriented to the learning ecosystem
Kodama H., Suzuki M.T., Yaginuma Y.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose the need for an integrated system for the production, authoring, addition and revision of webcast content and a multi-device apps mechanism with rights management for Internet transmission in the perspective of the OUJ course reuse.Design/methodology/approachThis paper designs systems that reuse the existing OUJ courses from the viewpoint of effective utilization, combine broadcasting lectures and online lectures of the OUJ courses and seamlessly link them as media-mix contents. In contrast to content development methodologies that assume embedded content production, this paper’s methodology takes an approach to producing and authoring webcasting content, flexibly adding and revising the content and transmitting that content over the internet via multi-device apps, taking rights management into account.FindingsThere is concern about the ELSI arising from the use of generative AI. It is directed at web content. This paper can contribute to resolving the ELSI surrounding the use of generative AI because it discusses a method of learning content development that clarifies the attribution of rights to content.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper lies in the fact that it is oriented to reuse existing lectures of the OUJ courses and simplify the rights clearance for them, from the perspective of the learning ecosystem. The value of this paper is that it can also serve as a technical and legal response to the production, authoring and Internet transmission of open university courses in the era of generative AI.
Q1

Advancing open education through open-source software: examining UTAUT 2 factors in adoption and implementation
Duan C.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to examine the factors influencing university students' adoption of open-source software (OSS) within the context of open educational practices (OEP) by applying an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT 2) model.Design/methodology/approachThe research employs a quantitative approach, gathering data from 156 students at Hong Kong Metropolitan University through an online survey. The survey was designed to test nine hypotheses derived from the UTAUT 2 model, incorporating additional constructs relevant to OSS. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to analyse the data and test the relationships between constructs.FindingsThe results indicate that Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Price Value (PV), Self-Efficacy (SE) and Value Alignment (VA) significantly influence students' Behavioral Intention (BI) to adopt OSS. Conversely, Social Influence (SI), Facilitating Conditions (FC), Hedonic Motivation (HM) and Habit (HT) were not significant predictors. The findings suggest that while UTAUT 2 provides a useful framework for understanding OSS adoption, it requires adaptation to fully capture the unique characteristics of OSS in educational settings.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by extending the UTAUT 2 model to the context of OSS adoption in higher education, highlighting the importance of economic factors and user alignment with OSS values. The results offer practical insights for higher education institutions aiming to promote OSS, emphasizing the need for support structures, training, and the promotion of OSS’s economic and collaborative benefits.
Q1

Resisting technological solutionism in open universities in the time of global digital convergence
Lim D.C., Mat H., Yusooff F.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis purpose of this paper is to explore the future of open universities (OUs), particularly in developing Asia, focusing on the potential risks associated with technological solutionism, or the popular belief that educational problems can be readily solved through technological means. This exploration is pertinent as the initial advantages that OUs once held have significantly diminished and competing higher education institutions worldwide are converging on a digital future.Design/methodology/approachThe qualitative method of empathy-based stories (MEBS) was employed as the primary research method for drawing data from sampled OU teachers. The obtained data were parsed via textual analysis and the lens of critical discourses on technology and higher education.FindingsThe study shows that, in the future envisioned by the sampled OU teachers, students’ lack of privileged access to frontier technologies is no barrier to learning success. It also emphasises that learning outcomes have causality beyond technological determinism, and that educational problems, which OUs may deem as requiring technological solutions, are often non-technological in nature and require no technological fixes.Originality/valueCritiques of techno-solutionism, such as the present study, are virtually absent in the context of OUs in developing Asia. For this very reason, this study is vital and serves as a guardrail while these OUs seek to reformulate their respective value propositions in the time of global digital convergence.
Q1

Societal bonds in virtual spaces: exploring the sense of community in online student communities at Anadolu University’s Open Education System
Uçar M., Güler E., Koçdar S.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the levels of the sense of community among students enrolled in online student communities at Anadolu University Open Education System (OES), as well as their motivations for joining these communities and their expectations.Design/methodology/approachAn explanatory sequential design incorporating mixed research methods was employed as the research framework for this study. Quantitative data were collected from 1,065 students enrolled in online student communities during the 2021–2022 academic year, while qualitative data were obtained from 14 students after the survey using an extreme case sampling method. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance tests, correlation analysis and regression analysis. The qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.FindingsThe study results indicate that students enrolled in online student communities generally have higher levels of a sense of community. These levels did not significantly differ based on gender, employment status, entry type to the university, program studied or membership status in more than one community. However, significant differences were observed in terms of age, time spent in communities and meeting attendance. Additionally, students' perceptions of social presence had a significant effect on their sense of community.Originality/valueThis study is the first to investigate the sense of community in online student communities at Anadolu University's OES.
Q1

Demystifying the way libraries support distance learning: a bibliometric analysis of scholarly communication in distance libraries
Papachristopoulos L.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report on bibliometric research on the activities and services offered by distance libraries that serve distance learning institutions.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis of scholarly communication has always been a valuable tool for researchers and policymakers in order to understand trends, gaps and patterns in a specific field. In this paper, a bibliometric analysis has been applied based on a well-known bibliometric tool called “VOSviewer.” The articles that constitute the dataset of current research were drawn from two journals: the Journal of Library Administration and the Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning.FindingsThe bibliometric analysis applied in distance libraries showed that the researchers in this domain are mainly introverts and need to prioritize engaging in the scientific research process over merely publishing good practices. Although there are a lot of libraries serving distance learning institutions (formal and non-formal), there is a notable lack of activity in the scientific publication field.Originality/valueDistance libraries have played a significant role in supporting distance learning, and since distance education has become more important in the educational ecosystem, the analysis of its scholarly production would provide administrators, researchers and policymakers with insights for the next era of conventional libraries.
Q1

Enhancing online learning: a systematic literature review exploring the impact of screencast feedback on student learning outcomes
Din Eak A., Annamalai N.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Purpose This systematic literature review paper critically examines the effectiveness of screencast feedback compared with text feedback in promoting student learning outcomes in online higher education. This paper aims to contribute to the ongoing discussion surrounding feedback modalities and their impact on online learning environments.Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a systematic review approach to synthesise and analyse existing studies investigating the use of screencast feedback in online higher education settings. A comprehensive search and selection process was employed to identify relevant literature. The selected studies were then analysed for their methodologies, findings and implications. This paper seeks to provide an overview of the current state of research, highlighting the benefits, challenges and potential impacts of screencast feedback on student learning outcomes.Findings The findings of this paper suggest that while there is a positive perception of screencast feedback among students and instructors, drawing definitive conclusions about its superiority over text feedback remains at the very beginning. Students generally appreciate the personalised, supportive and engaging nature of screencast feedback, particularly within the online learning context. However, challenges such as technical barriers and potential workload implications for instructors are also noted. Further empirical research is needed to comprehensively evaluate the comparative efficacy of screencast feedback, considering factors like online engagement, digital literacy and the impact on diverse student populations.Research limitations/implications This review underscores the acute necessity for expansive and meticulously designed studies that can provide conclusive insights into the authentic potential of screencast feedback and its resonance within the unique landscape of online learning. Through rigorous inquiry, educators can discern the optimal strategies for harnessing the advantages of screencast feedback to enhance student learning outcomes, aligning harmoniously with the dynamics of virtual classrooms.Practical implications Screencast feedback emerges as a promising avenue to foster meaningful connections between instructors and learners. The review highlights that screencast feedback engenders a more dialogic interaction between lecturers and students, resulting in personalised, supportive and engaging feedback experiences.Social implications The systematic review conducted underscores the positive reception of screencast feedback from both students and lecturers in this context. The findings are consistent with the principles of social constructivist theory, suggesting that the interactive and personalised nature of screencast feedback facilitates a richer educational experience for students, even within the confines of virtual classrooms (Vygotsky, 1978).Originality/value This innovative blend of methodologies contributes new insights that can inform educational practices and pedagogical strategies in online learning environments.
Q1

A flipped classroom with whiteboard animation and modules to enhance students' self-regulation, critical thinking and communication skills: a conceptual framework and its implementation
Suwardika G., Sopandi A.T., Indrawan I.P., Masakazu K.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeIn the era of Industry 4.0, the relevance of webinar tutorials, a form of distance learning, is paramount. These tutorials can catalyze self-regulated learning, critical thinking and communication skills, especially for prospective and in-service teachers pursuing higher education. This paper aims to develop a conceptual framework and report the results of implementing a flipped classroom with whiteboard animation and modules. This innovative approach seeks to enhance students' self-regulation, critical thinking and communication abilities.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs a mixed-methods approach. In the first phase, a hypothetical model and conceptual framework for the Flipped Classroom with Whiteboard Animation and Modules were developed to enhance self-regulation, critical thinking and communication skills. The resulting conceptual framework was then implemented through a quasi-experiment using a non-equivalent control group design involving 83 elementary school teachers enrolled in the Elementary School Science Education course (PDGK4202), divided into three treatment groups. Qualitative data were collected through observations of the learning process, documentation of student worksheet completion and interviews with students. Questionnaires and tests were used as instruments for quantitative data collection. Qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive methods, while quantitative data were evaluated using MANCOVA.FindingsThe findings demonstrate significant improvements in students' self-regulation, critical thinking skills and communication abilities after implementing the Flipped Classroom with Whiteboard Animation and Modules.Research limitations/implicationsSome limitations in this study need to be recognized. These limitations include the specific sample type of elementary school teachers who went back to college to take science learning courses in elementary school. Teachers have various diversity that may affect the dependent variable, such as age, educational background, facilities, internet signal stability at their learning location and teaching experience. This study was conducted in a specific context (using the flipped classroom model at UT), so the results may need to be more generalizable to other educational contexts with different facilities, systems and policies. In addition, the measurement of self-regulation and communication skills, particularly with questionnaires, relies on self-report, which can be biased due to socially desirable responses or inaccurate self-assessment. Although the MANCOVA test showed significant results, it is possible that other variables not controlled for in this study (e.g. intrinsic motivation, social support from family or colleagues) also affected the independent variables.Practical implicationsThis study emphasizes the importance of adapting webinar tutorials for Industry 4.0 and enhancing self-regulated learning, critical thinking and communication skills, particularly for working students and teachers. It offers a practical framework for educators and suggests ways to improve online learning materials. The implementation results show significant skill enhancement. These findings have practical implications for educators, institutions and instructional designers, guiding the development of effective distance learning strategies and curriculum improvements in the digital age.Social implicationsThe social implications of this study are noteworthy. In the context of Industry 4.0, adapting webinar tutorials to promote self-regulated learning, critical thinking and communication skills is essential not only for the educational sector but also for the broader society. It equips prospective and in-service teachers, who are pivotal in shaping future generations, with the necessary skills to navigate a rapidly changing digital landscape. Furthermore, enhancing self-regulation and critical thinking abilities among employed students contributes to a more informed and adaptable workforce, fostering societal resilience in the face of technological advancements.Originality/valueThe uniqueness of this study stems from the creative modification of a webinar tutorial, which specifically targets the urgent requirement for enhancing abilities among teachers and university students. The conceptual framework serves as a valuable tool for educators, and the findings of this study confirm its effectiveness in enhancing self-regulation, critical thinking abilities and communication proficiency. Furthermore, the recommendations offered also furnish practical insights to improve this model.
Q1

Student experiences of agile-blended learning in emergency online education: insights from a participatory case study
Wong J.M.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 4
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study examined the implementation of an agile-blended learning (ABL) approach in a master-level early childhood research course and assessed its impact on the learning experience. The purpose was to understand how incorporating ABL concepts affected flexibility, learner autonomy, collaboration and technology mediation, the core principles of ABL.Design/methodology/approachA participatory case study methodology was employed to gather insights from 40 students regarding their experiences in the redesigned research course. Data were collected through interviews, observations and document analysis. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed and quantitative data descriptively analyzed.FindingsABL fostered flexibility, convenience and learner autonomy. However, students desired richer interpersonal interactions. Technological integration enhanced learning, but social presence was lacking.Research limitations/implicationsThe study was limited to a specific master-level early childhood education course and focused on a particular group of students. Further research is needed to examine the generalizability of the findings in different educational contexts and student populations.Practical implicationsRecommendations include ongoing professional development and support systems to optimize ABL realization. Sustaining ABL practices necessitates flexible, empowering institutional structures.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by exploring the potential of ABL in the context of early childhood research education. It provides empirical evidence of the benefits of ABL for increased flexibility, learner autonomy, collaboration and technology mediation. The case study design adds to the originality by offering insights into the practical implementation of ABL in an educational setting.
Q1

Perceptions of students on artificial intelligence-generated content avatar utilization in learning management system
Tan S.F.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to explore students’ perceptions of the use of an artificial intelligence-generated content avatar (AIGC avatar) within a learning management system (LMS).Design/methodology/approachThis qualitative research involved seven postgraduate students. Data were collected through individual, in-depth interviews. The videos of the AIGC avatar, created using Leonardo, ChatGPT and Heygen, were uploaded to the LMS to communicate with students for the purposes of a welcome note, assignment guide, assignment feedback, tutorial reminders and preparation as well as to provide encouragement and study tips. Students were interviewed at the end of the semester.FindingsThe findings of this study indicated that the majority of participating students held positive perceptions regarding the use of the AIGC avatar in the LMS. They reported that it enhanced their perceived instructor’s social presence and motivation to learn. The assignment guide and feedback were particularly valued by the participants. While some students noted the AIGC avatar’s lack of naturalness, others appreciated the clear and professional speech it delivered.Research limitations/implicationsThe study was confined to seven students from a single course at one institution, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research could involve a larger and more diverse group of participants.Practical implicationsThe findings may offer education providers an alternative solution for engaging students in an LMS.Originality/valueThis study highlights the potential of AIGC avatars to replace text-based communication in LMS and enhance students’ perceived instructor social presence.
Q1

Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs
Laosum T.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to develop a model for readiness measurement and to study readiness levels for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs.Design/methodology/approachIn total, 870 undergraduate students enrolled in the 2022 academic year of a Thai university were sampled for the study. The samples were divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 432 students who underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Group 2 comprised 438 students who underwent second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Both were multi-stage random samples. Descriptive statistics, item-total correlations (ITCs), coefficient correlations, EFA and second-order CFA were used.FindingsThe readiness for the online testing model comprised 5 factors and 33 indicators. These included self-efficacy (SE) in utilizing technology (nine indicators), self-directed learning (SL) for readiness testing (six indicators), adequacy of technology (AT) for testing (five indicators), acceptance of online testing (AC) (seven indicators) and readiness training for testing (six indicators). The model was congruent with empirical data, and the survey results indicated that students were highly prepared at the “high” level.Practical implicationsThis study disclosed several factors and indicators involved in the readiness for online testing. The university may use these findings in preparing its students for online testing for better achievement.Originality/valueThese findings may serve as a framework for the analysis of the readiness issues for online testing of undergraduate students and also offer guidance to the universities preparing to offer online testing.
Top-100
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
Cureus
149 citations, 7.55%
|
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
100 citations, 5.07%
|
|
Reactions Weekly
57 citations, 2.89%
|
|
Case Reports in Endocrinology
48 citations, 2.43%
|
|
BMJ Case Reports
42 citations, 2.13%
|
|
Endocrine
28 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
27 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
21 citations, 1.06%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
19 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
19 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Cancers
17 citations, 0.86%
|
|
World Journal of Clinical Cases
16 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
16 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Endocrine Journal
16 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Clinical Case Reports
16 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Journal of the Endocrine Society
15 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Endocrine Reviews
13 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Case Reports
13 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Internal Medicine
13 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Pituitary
12 citations, 0.61%
|
|
JCEM Case Reports
12 citations, 0.61%
|
|
BMC Endocrine Disorders
11 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Frontiers in Pediatrics
11 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Scientific Reports
11 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Side Effects of Drugs Annual
11 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
10 citations, 0.51%
|
|
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
10 citations, 0.51%
|
|
European Journal of Endocrinology
10 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Endocrine-Related Cancer
10 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
9 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Biomedicines
9 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Frontiers in Surgery
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
European Endocrinology
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Annales d'Endocrinologie
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Medicina
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Diagnostics
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Medical Case Reports
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Obesity and Metabolism
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Nutrients
7 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
7 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
7 citations, 0.35%
|
|
International Journal of Endocrinology
7 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
7 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Problemy Endokrinologii
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Clinical Rheumatology
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Endocrinology
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Gland Surgery
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Endocrine Pathology
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Endocrinologia, Diabetes y Nutricion
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Hormones
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Endocrine Surgery
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
AACE Clinical Case Reports
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
European Thyroid Journal
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Diagnostic Cytopathology
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology: Case Reports
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Endocrine Practice
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Hormone Research in Paediatrics
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Neuroendocrinology
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Endocrine Connections
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
World Journal of Gastroenterology
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of General Medicine
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Thyroid Research
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
PLoS ONE
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Clinical and experimental thyroidology
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Endocrinología Diabetes y Nutrición (English ed )
5 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Case Reports in Psychiatry
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Virchows Archiv
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Radiology Case Reports
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Acta Hepatologica Japonica
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Medical Genetics
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
World Journal of Endocrine Surgery
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Ear, Nose and Throat Journal
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Endocrine Regulations
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Clinical Endocrinology
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Case Reports in Oncology
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Arkhiv Patologii
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Medical Case Reports Journal
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Surgical Case Reports
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Annals of Internal Medicine Clinical Cases
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
World Neurosurgery
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Abdominal Radiology
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Gynecological Endocrinology
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Internal Medicine Journal
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Chinese Medicine
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Bone Reports
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Citing publishers
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
Springer Nature
458 citations, 23.21%
|
|
Elsevier
201 citations, 10.19%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
170 citations, 8.62%
|
|
MDPI
131 citations, 6.64%
|
|
Wiley
110 citations, 5.58%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
85 citations, 4.31%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
73 citations, 3.7%
|
|
BMJ
54 citations, 2.74%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
50 citations, 2.53%
|
|
Bioscientifica
30 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Oxford University Press
29 citations, 1.47%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
29 citations, 1.47%
|
|
S. Karger AG
28 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Endocrinology Research Centre
27 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
24 citations, 1.22%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
19 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
18 citations, 0.91%
|
|
SAGE
18 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
15 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
13 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
13 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
10 citations, 0.51%
|
|
The Japan Endocrine Society
9 citations, 0.46%
|
|
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
IntechOpen
8 citations, 0.41%
|
|
7 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Medknow
7 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Touch Medical Media LTD.
7 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
6 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Physiological Society
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Japan Society of Hepatology
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American College of Physicians
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Remedium, Ltd.
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
4 citations, 0.2%
|
|
AIP Publishing
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Publishing House ABV Press
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
SciELO
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI)
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Korean Thyroid Association
3 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Radcliffe Media Media Ltd
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Korean society of pediatric endocrinology
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Knowledge E DMCC
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
F1000 Research
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Hans Publishers
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Korean Society of Medical Genetics
2 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Begell House
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Impact Journals
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Index Copernicus
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Academy of Medicine Singapore
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Society for Translational Oncology
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Slovak Toxicology Society SETOX
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Cardiological Society of India
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Copernicus
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Neoplasia Press
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Endocrine Society
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Neuoradiology
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Hrvatsko drustvo medicinskih biokemicara
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Fundacja Lekarzy Polskich-Pro-Medica
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Academic Journals
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
IMA Press, LLC
1 citation, 0.05%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
10 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
9 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
9 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Brown University
8 publications, 1.2%
|
|
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Kanagawa Cancer Center
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Calgary
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
West Virginia University
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Miami
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Rhode Island Hospital
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Milan
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Drexel University
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Mahidol University
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Ohio State University
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Michigan
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
McGill University
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Mohammed VI
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Tokyo Medical and Dental University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Ramathibodi Hospital
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Missouri–Kansas City
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of British Columbia
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Puerto Rico
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Florida
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Westchester Medical Center
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Van Yüzüncü Yıl University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Post graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Hamad Medical Corporation
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Turin
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Aarhus University Hospital
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Sydney
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Pavia
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Cairo University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
George Washington University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Harvard University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Bridgeport Hospital
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Tufts Medical Center
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Osaka University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Tohoku University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Minnesota
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Yokohama City University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Yokohama City University Medical Center
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Porto
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Jackson Memorial Hospital
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Kentucky
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Rochester
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Tunis El Manar University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Ankara University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Prince Sultan Military Medical City
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
King Fahd Medical City
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Bushehr University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Erciyes University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Başkent University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Hanoi Medical University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Sichuan University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Kuwait University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Genoa
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Southern California
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Michigan State University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Auckland
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Townsville University Hospital
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Siriraj Hospital
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Yale New Haven Health System
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Keio University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Nagoya University
2 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
5 publications, 2.11%
|
|
Kanagawa Cancer Center
5 publications, 2.11%
|
|
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
4 publications, 1.69%
|
|
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
4 publications, 1.69%
|
|
West Virginia University
4 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Brown University
4 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Mohammed VI
4 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
3 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Cornell University
3 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Bridgeport Hospital
3 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Tohoku University
3 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Florida
3 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Rhode Island Hospital
3 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Hanoi Medical University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Post graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Hamad Medical Corporation
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Kuwait University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Pavia
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Cairo University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Missouri–Kansas City
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Yale New Haven Health System
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Osaka University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
McGill University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Colombo
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Western University of Health Sciences
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Westchester Medical Center
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Tunis El Manar University
2 publications, 0.84%
|
|
King Faisal University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Majmaah University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Yasuj University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University Medical Center HCMC
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Hanoi Medical University Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Hue University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Universal Scientific Education and Research Network
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Sichuan University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Gumushane University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Dasman Diabetes Institute
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Liège
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Amiri Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Bern
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University Hospital of Basel
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Aalborg University Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Aalborg University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University College Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Aarhus University Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Antwerp University Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Cagliari
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Florida State University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Stony Brook University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Perugia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Brescia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Siena
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Spedali Civili di Brescia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Niguarda Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Istituto Giannina Gaslini
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of Western Australia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Royal North Shore Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
La Trobe University
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Austin Health
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Prince of Wales Hospital (Australia)
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
The Alfred Hospital
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
St George Hospital and Community Health Service (Australia)
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
1 publication, 0.42%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 266, 40%
USA
266 publications, 40%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 44, 6.62%
Japan
44 publications, 6.62%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 37, 5.56%
Italy
37 publications, 5.56%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 30, 4.51%
Turkey
30 publications, 4.51%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 22, 3.31%
United Kingdom
22 publications, 3.31%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 21, 3.16%
Canada
21 publications, 3.16%
|
India
|
India, 17, 2.56%
India
17 publications, 2.56%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 15, 2.26%
Australia
15 publications, 2.26%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 15, 2.26%
Mexico
15 publications, 2.26%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 15, 2.26%
Thailand
15 publications, 2.26%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 15, 2.26%
Sri Lanka
15 publications, 2.26%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 14, 2.11%
Morocco
14 publications, 2.11%
|
China
|
China, 12, 1.8%
China
12 publications, 1.8%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 10, 1.5%
Iran
10 publications, 1.5%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 10, 1.5%
Saudi Arabia
10 publications, 1.5%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 9, 1.35%
Portugal
9 publications, 1.35%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 8, 1.2%
Brazil
8 publications, 1.2%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 8, 1.2%
Spain
8 publications, 1.2%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 7, 1.05%
Belgium
7 publications, 1.05%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 7, 1.05%
Greece
7 publications, 1.05%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 7, 1.05%
Denmark
7 publications, 1.05%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 1.05%
Singapore
7 publications, 1.05%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 7, 1.05%
Tunisia
7 publications, 1.05%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 6, 0.9%
Republic of Korea
6 publications, 0.9%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 5, 0.75%
Germany
5 publications, 0.75%
|
France
|
France, 5, 0.75%
France
5 publications, 0.75%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 5, 0.75%
Nepal
5 publications, 0.75%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 0.6%
Egypt
4 publications, 0.6%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 4, 0.6%
Israel
4 publications, 0.6%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.6%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.6%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.6%
UAE
4 publications, 0.6%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 0.6%
Switzerland
4 publications, 0.6%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.45%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.45%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.45%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 3, 0.45%
Qatar
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 0.45%
Kuwait
3 publications, 0.45%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.45%
New Zealand
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 3, 0.45%
Syria
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.3%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.3%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.3%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.3%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.3%
Poland
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.3%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.3%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.3%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.3%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.15%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.15%
Austria
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.15%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.15%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.15%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.15%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.15%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.15%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.15%
Oman
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.15%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.15%
Peru
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.15%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.15%
Romania
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.15%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.15%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.15%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.15%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.15%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.15%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Show all (36 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
USA
|
USA, 86, 36.29%
USA
86 publications, 36.29%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 14, 5.91%
Japan
14 publications, 5.91%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 13, 5.49%
Italy
13 publications, 5.49%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 11, 4.64%
Sri Lanka
11 publications, 4.64%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 8, 3.38%
Morocco
8 publications, 3.38%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 7, 2.95%
Australia
7 publications, 2.95%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 7, 2.95%
Iran
7 publications, 2.95%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 2.53%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 2.53%
|
China
|
China, 5, 2.11%
China
5 publications, 2.11%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 2.11%
Belgium
5 publications, 2.11%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 5, 2.11%
Canada
5 publications, 2.11%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 5, 2.11%
Mexico
5 publications, 2.11%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 5, 2.11%
Thailand
5 publications, 2.11%
|
India
|
India, 4, 1.69%
India
4 publications, 1.69%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 4, 1.69%
Nepal
4 publications, 1.69%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 1.69%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 1.69%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 4, 1.69%
Tunisia
4 publications, 1.69%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 1.27%
Portugal
3 publications, 1.27%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 1.27%
Brazil
3 publications, 1.27%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 1.27%
Vietnam
3 publications, 1.27%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 1.27%
Denmark
3 publications, 1.27%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 1.27%
Egypt
3 publications, 1.27%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 3, 1.27%
Singapore
3 publications, 1.27%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 1.27%
Switzerland
3 publications, 1.27%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 2, 0.84%
Germany
2 publications, 0.84%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.84%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.84%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.84%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.84%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.84%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.84%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 2, 0.84%
Syria
2 publications, 0.84%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.84%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.84%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.42%
France
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.42%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.42%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.42%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.42%
Greece
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.42%
Israel
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.42%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.42%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.42%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.42%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.42%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.42%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.42%
UAE
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.42%
Oman
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.42%
Peru
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.42%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.42%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.42%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.42%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.42%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.42%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.42%
|
Show all (20 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
1 profile journal article
Madahar Inderpreet
2 publications,
36 citations
h-index: 1