International Review of Sociology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1
SJR
0.432
CiteScore
2.7
Categories
Sociology and Political Science
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1987-1994, 2003-2025
journal names
International Review of Sociology
INT REV SOCIOL
Top-3 citing journals

International Review of Sociology
(119 citations)

SSRN Electronic Journal
(95 citations)

Sustainability
(50 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Sapienza University of Rome
(51 publications)

University of Bologna
(24 publications)

University of Milano-Bicocca
(16 publications)

Sapienza University of Rome
(17 publications)

University of Bologna
(8 publications)

University of Messina
(3 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 257
Q1

SinSO: An ontology of sustainability in software
Restrepo L., Pardo C., Aguilar J., Toro M., Suescún E.
Sustainability in systems refers to applying sustainable principles and practices to create more resilient, efficient, and equitable systems that promote the well-being of people and the planet. Sustainability is an essential topic in contemporary software engineering, and its relationship with the characteristics and properties of a system or product called quality attributes is still an open question since each researcher has established their definition of sustainability in software. This has created diverse terms and concepts for distinct application environments and scopes, creating ambiguity and misconceptions. This work defines a domain ontology of Sustainability in Software named SinSO to address these issues. SinSO was implemented in OWL, using competency-based questions to validate. The findings show that this proposal satisfies several quality and content requirements. Also, using Protégé and the Hermit reasoner, we verified that SinSO is consistent since the ontology statements are coherent and do not lead to conflicting or contradictory conclusions. In addition, competency questions allowed us to demonstrate that SinSO does fulfill its purpose. FOCA methodology allowed us to evaluate SinSO quality. Also, SinSO was used in two case studies, one about software for senior-citizen smart-home, and the other, a simulator to develop and test smart-city applications, achieving positive outcomes. To verify its accuracy, completeness, and maintainability, further evaluations of SinSO are needed in real case studies. We conclude that SinSO can significantly contribute to reducing ambiguity and enhancing comprehension in this area. Furthermore, SinSO can be an effective tool for engineers to recognize the concepts and relationships in the sustainable domain to consider in the systems development life cycle to build sustainable systems.
Q1

ONTO-TDM domain ontology population for a specific discipline
Abdoune R., Lazib L., Dahmani-Bouarab F., Fernández-Breis J.
Ontologies play a vital role in organizing and constructing knowledge across various domains, enabling effective knowledge management and sharing. The development of domain-specific ontologies, such as the ONTO-TDM ontology for teaching domain modeling, is essential for providing a comprehensive and standardized representation of knowledge within a given discipline. However, to maximize the usefulness and relevance of such ontologies, it is crucial to automate their population with domain-specific information, reducing manual work and ensuring scalability. This paper presents a novel method for ontology population by extracting and integrating relevant information from diverse sources. The method combines the TextRank algorithm with Word2Vec to enhance keyword extraction, capturing both semantic meaning and textual importance. Keywords are then annotated and used to train a machine learning classifier, which aids in integrating new instances into the ontology. Experiments show that the proposed method achieves a precision of 63.33%, a recall of 61.29% and an F1-score of 62.28%, significantly improving keyword extraction and ontology population accuracy compared to existing methods. This validates the method’s effectiveness in semi-automatically extracting relevant instances from diverse data sources, enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of ontology population, and advancing automated knowledge management in domain-specific contexts.
Q1

Ontology and its applications in skills matching in job recruitment
Tuan A., Dang M., Do H., Solanki V., Torres J., Gonzalez Crespo R., Nguyen T.
In the recruitment process, manually selecting suitable candidates from curriculum vitae (CVs) for a job description (JD) is both time-consuming and expensive. Traditional keyword-based methods struggle to capture skill semantics, prompting the development of more advanced JD-CV matching systems. This paper aims to investigate and construct an ontology-based skills recommendation system, with objectives including creating a skills ontology and developing skills matching methods for JD-CV pairs. The objective of our approach is to enhance the accuracy and contextual relevance of recommendations by utilizing the proposed score. The proposed skills ontology and skills matching strategies are applied to a real dataset in Vietnam. The results of our study can automatically recommend a list of CVs for a given JD. Furthermore, the findings indicate that our proposed model surpasses comparative approaches by a margin of at least 1% to 5%. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of utilizing ontology-based approaches to offer a practical solution for enhancing hiring practices.
Q1

How to classify domain entities into top-level ontology concepts using large language models
Lopes A., Carbonera J., Rodrigues F., Garcia L., Abel M.
Classifying domain entities into their respective top-level ontology concepts is a complex problem that typically demands manual analysis and deep expertise in the domain of interest and ontology engineering. Using an efficient approach to classify domain entities enhances data integration, interoperability, and the semantic clarity of ontologies, which are crucial for structured knowledge representation and modeling. Based on this, our main motivation is to help an ontology engineer with an automated approach to classify domain entities into top-level ontology concepts using informal definitions of these domain entities during the ontology development process. In this context, we hypothesize that the informal definitions encapsulate semantic information crucial for associating domain entities with specific top-level ontology concepts. Our approach leverages state-of-the-art language models to explore our hypothesis across multiple languages and informal definitions from different knowledge resources. In order to evaluate our proposal, we extracted multi-label datasets from the alignment of the OntoWordNet ontology and the BabelNet semantic network, covering the entire structure of the Dolce-Lite-Plus top-level ontology from most generic to most specific concepts. These datasets contain several different textual representation approaches of domain entities, including terms, example sentences, and informal definitions. Our experiments conducted 3 study cases, investigating the effectiveness of our proposal across different textual representation approaches, languages, and knowledge resources. We demonstrate that the best results are achieved using a classification pipeline with a K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) method to classify the embedding representation of informal definitions from the Mistral large language model. The findings underscore the potential of informal definitions in reflecting top-level ontology concepts and point towards developing automated tools that could significantly aid ontology engineers during the ontology development process.
Q1

Information extraction from automotive reports for ontology population
Ahaggach H., Abrouk L., Lebon E.
In this paper, we showcase our research on the use of ontologies and information extraction for the purpose of modeling damages incurred on car bodies. With the increasing use of technology in the automotive industry, it is important to have a standardized and efficient way of documenting and analyzing car damage reports. Most existing reports are unstructured, and there is a lack of standardization in describing the damage. To address this issue, we have developed a domain ontology for car damage modeling ( OCD), 1 1 industryportal.enit.fr/ontologies/OCD , 2 2 github.com/OntologyCarDamage/OCD and proposed an end-to-end system to extract information from French automotive reports. The information extraction process involves using named entity recognition (NER) and relationship extraction (RE) techniques to identify and extract relevant information from the reports. Then, the extracted information is used to populate the [Formula: see text] ontology, allowing a structured and standardized representation of the damage information. The proposed system was tested on a real dataset of automotive reports and showed promising results.
Q1

From slot mereology to a mereology of slots
Tarbouriech C., Vieu L., Barton A., Éthier J.
In 2013, Bennett proposed a mereological theory in which the parthood relation is defined on the basis of two primitive relations: a is a part of b iff a fills a slot owned by b. However, this theory has issues counting how many parts an entity has. We explore the various counting problems and propose a new theory to solve them. Keeping the core idea of Bennett’s slots, this theory introduces mereological relations between slots. This theory enables us to solve all known counting problems and to go beyond the limits of Bennett’s theory by theorising expected features of mereological theories: supplementation principles and mereological sum and fusion. The theory is illustrated on ontological issues on the nature of structural universals and informational entities.
Q1

Towards a semantic blockchain: A behaviouristic approach to modelling Ethereum
Bella G., Cantone D., Nicolosi Asmundo M., Santamaria D.F.
Decentralised ledgers are gaining momentum following the interest of industries and people in smart contracts. Major attention is paid to blockchain applications intended for trading assets that exploit digital cryptographic certificates called tokens. Particularly relevant tokens are the non-fungible tokens (NFTs), namely, unique and non-replicable tokens used to represent the cryptographic counterpart of assets ranging from pieces of art through to licenses and certifications. A relevant consequence of the hard-coded nature of blockchains is the hardness of probing, in particular when advanced searchers involving the capabilities of the smart contracts or the assets digitised by NFTs are required. For this purpose, a formal representation for the operational semantics of smart contracts and of tokens has become particularly urgent, especially in economy and finance, where blockchains become increasingly relevant. Hence, we feel the need to tailor Semantic Web technologies to achieve that semantic representation at least for NFTS. This article reports on an ontology that leverages the Ontology for Agents, Systems, and Integration of Services (“OASIS”) towards the semantic representation of smart contracts responsible for managing ERC721-compliant NFTs and running on the Ethereum blockchain. Called Ether-OASIS, the proposed ontology adopts OASIS and tailors its behaviouristic approach to the Ethereum blockchain by conceiving smart contracts as agents running on the blockchain and, consequently, smart contract interactions as agent commitments. Smart contracts are represented in terms of their actions, purposes and tokens that they manage, thus realising a blockchain that is more usable both by users and automated applications. The ontology is evaluated using standard ontological metrics and applied on a case study concerning the minting and transferring of NFTs that digitise batches of wheat.
Q1

Concept systems and frames: Detecting and managing terminological gaps between languages
Resi R.
This paper examines the concept of “terminological gaps” and strives to identify suitable methods for dealing with them during translation. The analysis begins with an investigation of the contended notion of gaps in terminology based on empirical examples drawn from a German-Italian terminological database specifically designed for translation purposes. Two macro categories of gaps are identified, conceptual and linguistic level gaps, which only partially correspond to previous observations in the literature. The paper uses examples to explore the advantages of ontological representations for detecting conceptual terminological gaps and identifying appropriate translation strategies. However, limitations are also observed and an attempt is made to resolve these using a frame-based approach. A frame-based analysis reveals that while certain designations may appear to refer to convergent conceptual units with matching distinctive features, differences also emerge due to the way the two language systems build designations. Examples from the corpus make it evident that a frame-based approach is helpful for identifying both kinds of terminological gaps, and then resolving them during translation. An important presupposition for this approach is that larger units of analysis need to be addressed rather than just terms themselves. There is confirmation of the existing idea that methods embracing entire segments or paragraphs as units of investigation are preferable during translation, and this is also seen to apply in terminological studies.
Q1

Concept systems and frames in terminology
ten Hacken P., Resi R.
Q1
Applied Ontology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Toward a dynamic frame-based ontology of legal terminology
Nazarov W.
In the study of special languages and translation, the legal field is often insulated from other domains. This is primarily due to the extreme system dependence of the terminology of law, which results from a lack of a common legal system of reference throughout the world. The abstract nature of this human-made field and its dynamicity in view of the continuously evolving case law and constant changes in legislation make it difficult to illustrate its complex ontology through traditional terminology management techniques. Therefore, this paper argues for an interdisciplinary approach to constructing the ontology of legal concepts based on structural constituents from frame semantics and comparative law. Frames allowing for the representation of interconnected knowledge segments evoked by legal concepts and the distinction between micro- and macro-dimensions in legal comparison research make it possible to capture the complex ontology of legal terminology evoked in a specific point in time and a determined legal context. The ontological knowledge structure will be exemplified by terms from German social, commercial, employment, and tax law.
Q1

From specialized knowledge frames to linguistically based ontologies
Faber P., León-Araúz P.
This paper explains conceptual modeling within the framework of Frame-Based Terminology (Faber, 2012; 2015; 2022), as applied to EcoLexicon (ecolexicon.ugr.es), a specialized knowledge base on the environment (León-Araúz, Reimerink &, Faber, 2019; Faber & León-Araúz, 2021). It describes how a frame-based terminological resource is currently being restructured and reengineered as an initial step towards its formalization and subsequent transformation into an ontology. It also explains how the information in EcoLexicon can be integrated in environmental ontologies such as ENVO (Buttigieg, Morrison, Smith, Mungall & Lewis, 2013; Buttigieg, Pafilis, Lewis, Schildhauer, Walls & Mungall, 2016), particularly at the bottom tiers of the Ontology Learning Layer Cake (Cimiano, 2006; Cimiano, Maedche, Staab & Volker, 2009). The assumption is that frames, as a conceptual modeling tool, and information extracted from corpora can be used to represent the conceptual structure of a specialized domain.
Q1

Terminology in the domain of seafood: A comparative analysis Germany-Spain
Jiménez Alonso I., ten Hacken P.
In the last few decades, the study of terminology has undergone a cognitive shift that has led to the development of several approaches that study the social, linguistic, and cognitive dimension of terms, such as Communicative Theory of Terminology (CTT) and Frame-Based Terminology (FBT). CTT was developed in the early 1990s and argues that the study of terminology should be based on a communicative perspective, taking into account aspects such as the communicators and the context of communication. FBT has been developed from 2007 and uses certain aspects of Frame Semantics to conceptualise specialised domains and create non-language-specific representations through the analysis of the domain event and on the study of the behaviour of the terminological units in texts. The two theories share many of the same premises and propose the representation of the concepts of a domain in an ontology. FBT also proposes a representation in frames. We explore how these two methods of domain representation can be used to represent the terminology of the domain of seafood in Germany and Spain.
Q1

Ontologies and knowledge representation in terminology: Present and future perspectives
Giacomini L.
This contribution reflects on the current role of ontologies in terminology research and practice and their future role, especially with a view to the creation of fully digital terminographic resources. The very notion of (domain) ontology, its concept and term, is discussed, highlighting metaterminological differences and substantial ambiguities arising from the interdisciplinary contact between Ontology Engineering and Terminology. Major challenges in ontology building, e.g. subjectivity, are mentioned, also with respect to the distinction between realist and non-realist ontologies and their relevance in Terminology. In addition, this contribution presents some examples of terminology resources with a distinct ontological component, showing a diversity of approaches depending on the purpose of the resource and its scope. In this context, more specific topics are addressed, such as the acquisition of ontological data and suitable formats and models for representing domain knowledge. The contribution ends with a vision of the integration of complex concept systems such as ontologies in future terminology work: here, the development of models based on terminology-specific requirements and typical users will be fundamental.
Q1

Towards building knowledge by merging multiple ontologies with CoMerger: A partitioning-based approach
Babalou S., König-Ries B.
Ontologies are the prime way of organizing data in the Semantic Web. Often, it is necessary to combine several, independently developed ontologies to obtain a complete representation of a domain of interest. The complementarity of existing ontologies can be leveraged by merging them. Existing approaches for ontology merging mostly implement a binary merge. However, with the growing number and size of relevant ontologies across domains, scalability becomes a central challenge. A multi-ontology merging technique offers a potential solution to this problem. We present Co Merger, a scalable multiple ontologies merging method. It takes as input a set of source ontologies and existing mappings across them and generates a merged ontology. For efficient processing, rather than successively merging complete ontologies pairwise, we group related concepts across ontologies into partitions and merge first within and then across those partitions. In both steps, user-specified subsets of generic merge requirements (GMRs) are taken into account and used to optimize outputs. The experimental results on well-known datasets confirm the feasibility of our approach and demonstrate its superiority over binary strategies. A prototypical implementation is freely accessible through a live web portal.
Q1

Towards a German labor market ontology: Challenges and applications
Dörpinghaus J., Binnewitt J., Winnige S., Hein K., Krüger K.
The labor market is an area with diverse data structures and multiple applications, such as matching job seekers with the right training or job. For this reason, the multilingual classification of European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations (ESCO) is a good example of the central role of ontologies in this area. However, ESCO cannot provide all the details of local labor market needs and does not provide links to other hierarchies of competences. For example, other taxonomies of occupations and skills are widely used in German-speaking countries, but they are not in a state where they are easily accessible for interoperability and reasoning. In this paper, we present a first version of a German Labor Market Ontology (GLMO) that uses ESCO as a top-level ontology for the target domain. This makes it highly interoperable and comparable to existing ontologies by providing details for the regional structures in German-speaking countries. In addition, we present a detailed evaluation of the provided data and applications, as well as an extensive discussion of future work.
Top-100
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
International Review of Sociology
119 citations, 1.94%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
95 citations, 1.55%
|
|
Sustainability
50 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
34 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
32 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Current Sociology
25 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Religions
24 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Social Sciences
24 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
20 citations, 0.33%
|
|
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
19 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Ethnic and Racial Studies
18 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Global Networks
18 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
17 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Political Studies
17 citations, 0.28%
|
|
PLoS ONE
17 citations, 0.28%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
16 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
16 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Poetics
15 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Gender, Work and Organization
15 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Migration
15 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Sociology
14 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Voluntas
14 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Economic Issues
13 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Sociology Compass
13 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Political Geography
13 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Sociology
13 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Kybernetes
13 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
13 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Women's Studies International Forum
13 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Community, Work and Family
13 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Globalizations
12 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers in Sociology
12 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Demographic Research
11 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
11 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Comparative Sociology
11 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Energy Research and Social Science
11 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Public Management Review
11 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Higher Education
11 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of International Relations and Development
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Family Issues
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Sociological Review
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
British Journal of Sociology
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Identities
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Migration Review
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Population, Space and Place
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Bourdieu, Habitus and Field
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Youth Studies
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Social Movement Studies
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Men and Masculinities
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Entrepreneurship and Regional Development
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Social Politics
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Classical Sociology
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Social Compass
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cities
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Marriage and Family
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Sociologia Ruralis
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Advances in Life Course Research
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Ageing and Society
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
World Development
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of International Migration and Integration
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Japanese Journal of Political Science
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Futures
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journalism Practice
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Quality and Quantity
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Enterprise Journal
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Sociology
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Societies
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Children and Youth Services Review
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Family Studies
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Political Psychology
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Science Research
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Sociological Review
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Canadian Review of Sociology
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Journal of Social Theory
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Families, Relationships and Societies
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Political Science Review
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Revue européenne de migrations internationales
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Organizational Change Management
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of European Public Policy
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Nationalities Papers
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Organization Studies
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
European Educational Research Journal
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Gender Studies
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Social Work
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Risk Research
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Community Development
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Ethnicities
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
British Journal of Social Work
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Environment and Planning A
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Social Policy and Society
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Politics Groups and Identities
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IMISCOE Research Series
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1196 citations, 19.54%
|
|
Springer Nature
732 citations, 11.96%
|
|
SAGE
694 citations, 11.34%
|
|
Wiley
491 citations, 8.02%
|
|
Elsevier
449 citations, 7.33%
|
|
Emerald
265 citations, 4.33%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
253 citations, 4.13%
|
|
MDPI
163 citations, 2.66%
|
|
Oxford University Press
143 citations, 2.34%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
92 citations, 1.5%
|
|
IGI Global
57 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
53 citations, 0.87%
|
|
OpenEdition
50 citations, 0.82%
|
|
CAIRN
42 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
36 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
34 citations, 0.56%
|
|
SciELO
23 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Brill
19 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
19 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Bristol University Press
17 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Duke University Press
16 citations, 0.26%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
14 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
14 citations, 0.23%
|
|
University of California Press
12 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research/Max-Planck-institut fur Demografische Forschung
11 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Annual Reviews
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
BMJ
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AOSIS
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
World Scientific
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
EDP Sciences
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Goteborg University
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
PERSEE Program
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
F1000 Research
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Academy of Management
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Editora Universidade de Brasilia
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Instituto Universitario de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Institut francais des relations internationales (IFRI)
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Institute of Asian Studies at the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
JMIR Publications
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IntechOpen
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Intellect
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Noncommercial Partnership Editorial Board Polis
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Cornell University Press
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Copernicus
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Instituto Brasileiro de Relacoes Internacionais
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Centro de estudos sociais
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Nucleo de Comunicacao, Fundacao UNI
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academic Journals
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOS Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AIP Publishing
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Editions Odile Jacob
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Warsaw
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pluto Journals
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Akademika Forlag
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Unisa Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Editions Ophrys
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Indian Sociological Society
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
MGIMO University
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
RCNi
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Berghahn Books
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cogitatio
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Marketing Association
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
51 publications, 4.72%
|
|
University of Bologna
24 publications, 2.22%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
16 publications, 1.48%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
12 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Milan
11 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Macerata
10 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Chieti-Pescara
9 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Manchester
8 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Roma Tre University
8 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Trento
5 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Barcelona
5 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Valencia
5 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Uppsala University
4 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
4 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Antwerp
4 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Perugia
4 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Niccolò Cusano University
4 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Paris Cité University
4 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Göttingen
4 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Chuo University
4 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Jerusalem College of Technology
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Lisbon
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Haifa
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Stockholm University
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Umeå University
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Linnaeus University
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Turin
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Oxford
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Cagliari
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Verona
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Messina
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Siena
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Urbino
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Ca' Foscari University of Venice
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Osnabrück University
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Tartu
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Istanbul University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Yildiz Technical University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Gujrat
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Tampere University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Helsinki
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Geneva
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Drexel University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Michigan State University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Catania
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Guglielmo Marconi University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Kore University of Enna
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
European University Institute
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Free International University of Social Studies "Guido Carli"
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Maria SS. Assunta University of Rome
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Cologne
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Potsdam
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Leuphana University of Lüneburg
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Cardiff University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Bielefeld University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Leeds
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Tokyo
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Temple University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Warsaw
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Maribor
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Ottawa
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Sussex
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of La Laguna
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of North Texas
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Nairobi
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Gondar
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Bath
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
17 publications, 10.9%
|
|
University of Bologna
8 publications, 5.13%
|
|
University of Messina
3 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Urbino
3 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Macerata
3 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Gujrat
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Turin
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Antwerp
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Cagliari
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Drexel University
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Perugia
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Siena
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Chieti-Pescara
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Roma Tre University
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Guglielmo Marconi University
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Kore University of Enna
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Maribor
2 publications, 1.28%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Buketov Karagandy University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Semey Medical University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Georgian Technical University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Istanbul University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Ozyegin University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Mirpur University of Science & Technology
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Kadir Has University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Jerusalem College of Technology
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Malaya
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Tampere University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Stockholm University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
ETH Zurich
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Umeå University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Western Sydney University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Liverpool
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Nicosia
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Stavanger
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Salerno
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Niccolò Cusano University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Teramo
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Maria SS. Assunta University of Rome
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of South Africa
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Princeton University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Diponegoro University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
State University of Surabaya
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
American University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Pan-Atlantic University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Harvard University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of California, Davis
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Hangzhou City University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Debrecen
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Paris Cité University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Western Illinois University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Tulane University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
McMaster University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Technical University of Braunschweig
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Göttingen
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Potsdam
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Cardiff University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Temple University, Japan
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Temple University
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Coimbra
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Sheffield
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Wrocław
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Valencia
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Navarra
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
University of Miami
1 publication, 0.64%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
Italy
|
Italy, 198, 18.33%
Italy
198 publications, 18.33%
|
France
|
France, 63, 5.83%
France
63 publications, 5.83%
|
USA
|
USA, 61, 5.65%
USA
61 publications, 5.65%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 45, 4.17%
United Kingdom
45 publications, 4.17%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 38, 3.52%
Spain
38 publications, 3.52%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 34, 3.15%
Germany
34 publications, 3.15%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 33, 3.06%
Sweden
33 publications, 3.06%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 25, 2.31%
Canada
25 publications, 2.31%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 16, 1.48%
Brazil
16 publications, 1.48%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 13, 1.2%
Belgium
13 publications, 1.2%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 12, 1.11%
Israel
12 publications, 1.11%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 12, 1.11%
Japan
12 publications, 1.11%
|
India
|
India, 11, 1.02%
India
11 publications, 1.02%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 9, 0.83%
Portugal
9 publications, 0.83%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 9, 0.83%
Mexico
9 publications, 0.83%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 9, 0.83%
Poland
9 publications, 0.83%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 8, 0.74%
Greece
8 publications, 0.74%
|
China
|
China, 7, 0.65%
China
7 publications, 0.65%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 7, 0.65%
Australia
7 publications, 0.65%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 6, 0.56%
Netherlands
6 publications, 0.56%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 6, 0.56%
Turkey
6 publications, 0.56%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 0.56%
Switzerland
6 publications, 0.56%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 5, 0.46%
Estonia
5 publications, 0.46%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.46%
Norway
5 publications, 0.46%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 5, 0.46%
Slovenia
5 publications, 0.46%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 4, 0.37%
Russia
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 4, 0.37%
Austria
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 0.37%
Ireland
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 4, 0.37%
Cameroon
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 4, 0.37%
Slovakia
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.28%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 3, 0.28%
Kenya
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 0.28%
Nigeria
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 0.28%
Finland
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 0.19%
Kazakhstan
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.19%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.19%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.19%
Ghana
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 2, 0.19%
Georgia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.19%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.19%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.19%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.19%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.19%
Romania
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.19%
Chile
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.19%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.19%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 2, 0.19%
Yugoslavia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.09%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Bahamas
|
Bahamas, 1, 0.09%
Bahamas
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.09%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.09%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.09%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.09%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.09%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Timor-Leste
|
Timor-Leste, 1, 0.09%
Timor-Leste
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.09%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.09%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.09%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.09%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.09%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.09%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.09%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.09%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.09%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.09%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.09%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.09%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 1, 0.09%
Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.09%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Kosovo
|
Kosovo, 1, 0.09%
Kosovo
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Show all (41 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
|
|
Italy
|
Italy, 50, 32.05%
Italy
50 publications, 32.05%
|
USA
|
USA, 15, 9.62%
USA
15 publications, 9.62%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 8, 5.13%
United Kingdom
8 publications, 5.13%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 4.49%
Spain
7 publications, 4.49%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 3.85%
Poland
6 publications, 3.85%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 6, 3.85%
Sweden
6 publications, 3.85%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 4, 2.56%
Germany
4 publications, 2.56%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 2.56%
Portugal
4 publications, 2.56%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 2.56%
Belgium
4 publications, 2.56%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 2.56%
Canada
4 publications, 2.56%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 3, 1.92%
Estonia
3 publications, 1.92%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 1.92%
Australia
3 publications, 1.92%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 1.92%
Norway
3 publications, 1.92%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 1.92%
Slovenia
3 publications, 1.92%
|
France
|
France, 2, 1.28%
France
2 publications, 1.28%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 1.28%
Kazakhstan
2 publications, 1.28%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 1.28%
Brazil
2 publications, 1.28%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 2, 1.28%
Georgia
2 publications, 1.28%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 1.28%
Indonesia
2 publications, 1.28%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 1.28%
Netherlands
2 publications, 1.28%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 1.28%
Pakistan
2 publications, 1.28%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 1.28%
Turkey
2 publications, 1.28%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 1.28%
Japan
2 publications, 1.28%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.64%
Russia
1 publication, 0.64%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.64%
China
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.64%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.64%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.64%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.64%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.64%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.64%
Greece
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.64%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.64%
Israel
1 publication, 0.64%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.64%
India
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.64%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.64%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.64%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.64%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.64%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.64%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.64%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.64%
Romania
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.64%
Finland
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.64%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.64%
Chile
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.64%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.64%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.64%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.64%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Kosovo
|
Kosovo, 1, 0.64%
Kosovo
1 publication, 0.64%
|
Show all (19 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
|