Open Access
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
SJR
0.323
CiteScore
2.8
Categories
Emergency Medical Services
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Areas
Health Professions
Medicine
Years of issue
2020-2025
journal names
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Top-3 citing journals

Radiation Medicine and Protection
(48 citations)

Cancers
(14 citations)

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
(12 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Soochow University (Suzhou)
(19 publications)

Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention
(11 publications)

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
(8 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 560

Automated Detection of Hydrocephalus in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Using VGG 16 CNN Deep Learning Architecture and Based Automated Segmentation Workflow for Ventricular Volume Estimation
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Sekkat H., Khallouqi A., Rhazouani O.E., Halimi A.


Lumos: Software for Multi-level Multi-reader Comparison of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Late Gadolinium Enhancement Scar Quantification
Reisdorf P., Gavrysh J., Ammann C., Fenski M., Kolbitsch C., Lange S., Hennemuth A., Schulz-Menger J., Hadler T.
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) offers state-of-the-art myocardial tissue differentiation. The CMR technique late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) currently provides the noninvasive gold standard for the detection of myocardial fibrosis. Typically, thresholding methods are used for fibrotic scar tissue quantification. A major challenge for standardized CMR assessment is large variations in the estimated scar for different methods. The aim was to improve quality assurance for LGE scar quantification, a multi-reader comparison tool “Lumos” was developed to support quality control for scar quantification methods. The thresholding methods and an exact rasterization approach were implemented, as well as a graphical user interface (GUI) with statistical and case-specific tabs. Twenty LGE cases were considered with half of them including artifacts and clinical results for eight scar quantification methods computed. Lumos was successfully implemented as a multi-level multi-reader comparison software, and differences between methods can be seen in the statistical results. Histograms visualize confounding effects of different methods. Connecting the statistical level with the case level allows for backtracking statistical differences to sources of differences in the threshold calculation. Being able to visualize the underlying groundwork for the different methods in the myocardial histogram gives the opportunity to identify causes for different thresholds. Lumos showed the differences in the clinical results between cases with artifacts and cases without artifacts. A video demonstration of Lumos is offered as supplementary material 1. Lumos allows for a multi-reader comparison for LGE scar quantification that offers insights into the origin of reader differences.

Radiology AI Lab: Evaluation of Radiology Applications with Clinical End-Users
Paalvast O., Sevenster M., Hertgers O., de Bliek H., Wijn V., Buil V., Knoester J., Vosbergen S., Lamb H.
Abstract
Despite the approval of over 200 artificial intelligence (AI) applications for radiology in the European Union, widespread adoption in clinical practice remains limited. Current assessments of AI applications often rely on post-hoc evaluations, lacking the granularity to capture real-time radiologist-AI interactions. The purpose of the study is to realise the Radiology AI lab for real-time, objective measurement of the impact of AI applications on radiologists’ workflows. We proposed the user-state sensing framework (USSF) to structure the sensing of radiologist-AI interactions in terms of personal, interactional, and contextual states. Guided by the USSF, a lab was established using three non-invasive biometric measurement techniques: eye-tracking, heart rate monitoring, and facial expression analysis. We conducted a pilot test with four radiologists of varying experience levels, who read ultra-low-dose (ULD) CT cases in (1) standard PACS and (2) manually annotated (to mimic AI) PACS workflows. Interpretation time, eye-tracking metrics, heart rate variability (HRV), and facial expressions were recorded and analysed. The Radiology AI lab was successfully realised as an initial physical iteration of the USSF at a tertiary referral centre. Radiologists participating in the pilot test read 32 ULDCT cases (mean age, 52 years ± 23 (SD); 17 male; 16 cases with abnormalities). Cases were read on average in 4.1 ± 2.2 min (standard PACS) and 3.9 ± 1.9 min (AI-annotated PACS), with no significant difference (p = 0.48). Three out of four radiologists showed significant shifts (p < 0.02) in eye-tracking metrics, including saccade duration, saccade quantity, fixation duration, fixation quantity, and pupil diameter, when using the AI-annotated workflow. These changes align with prior findings linking such metrics to increased competency and reduced cognitive load, suggesting a more efficient visual search strategy in AI-assisted interpretation. Although HRV metrics did not correlate with experience, when combined with facial expression analysis, they helped identify key moments during the pilot test. The Radiology AI lab was successfully realised, implementing personal, interactional, and contextual states of the user-state sensing framework, enabling objective analysis of radiologists’ workflows, and effectively capturing relevant biometrics. Future work will focus on expanding sensing of the contextual state of the user-state sensing framework, refining baseline determination, and continuing investigation of AI-enabled tools in radiology workflows.

Radiomics with Ultrasound Radiofrequency Data for Improving Evaluation of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Yan D., Li Q., Chuang Y., Lin C., Shieh J., Weng W., Tsui P.


AI-Based 3D Liver Segmentation and Volumetric Analysis in Living Donor Data
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Mun S.B., Choi S.T., Kim Y.J., Kim K.G., Lee W.S.


A Two-Stage Lightweight Deep Learning Framework for Mass Detection and Segmentation in Mammograms Using YOLOv5 and Depthwise SegNet
Manolakis D., Bizopoulos P., Lalas A., Votis K.
Abstract
Ensuring strict medical data privacy standards while delivering efficient and accurate breast cancer segmentation is a critical challenge. This paper addresses this challenge by proposing a lightweight solution capable of running directly in the user’s browser, ensuring that medical data never leave the user’s computer. Our proposed solution consists of a two-stage model: the pre-trained nano YoloV5 variation handles the task of mass detection, while a lightweight neural network model of just 20k parameters and an inference time of 21 ms per image addresses the segmentation problem. This highly efficient model in terms of inference speed and memory consumption was created by combining well-known techniques, such as the SegNet architecture and depthwise separable convolutions. The detection model manages an mAP@50 equal to 50.3% on the CBIS-DDSM dataset and 68.2% on the INbreast dataset. Despite its size, our segmentation model produces high-performance levels on the CBIS-DDSM (81.0% IoU, 89.4% Dice) and INbreast (77.3% IoU, 87.0% Dice) dataset.

Facilitating Radiograph Interpretation: Refined Generative Models for Precise Bone Suppression in Chest X-rays
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Ibrahim S., Selim S., Elattar M.


SADiff: A Sinogram-Aware Diffusion Model for Low-Dose CT Image Denoising
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Niknejad Mazandarani F., Babyn P., Alirezaie J.


I-BrainNet: Deep Learning and Internet of Things (DL/IoT)–Based Framework for the Classification of Brain Tumor
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Ibrahim A.U., Engo G.M., Ame I., Nwekwo C.W., Al-Turjman F.


A Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Image Grading Model Integrating Medical Prior Knowledge
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Chen H., Liu C., Cheng X., Jiang C., Wang Y.


Robust Automatic Grading of Blunt Liver Trauma in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Label-Noise-Resistant Models
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Zhang T., Li R., Zhong Z., Zhang X., Liu T., Zhou G., Lv F.


Subtraction of Temporally Sequential Digital Mammograms: Prediction and Localization of Near-Term Breast Cancer Occurrence
Loizidou K., Skouroumouni G., Savvidou G., Constantinidou A., Vlachou E.O., Yiallourou A., Pitris C., Nikolaou C.
Abstract
The objective is to predict a possible near-term occurrence of a breast mass after two consecutive screening rounds with normal mammograms. For the purposes of this study, conducted between 2020 and 2024, three consecutive rounds of mammograms were collected from 75 women, 46 to 79 years old. Successive screenings had an average interval of
$$\sim$$
∼
2 years. In each case, two mammographic views of each breast were collected, resulting in a dataset with a total of 450 images (3 × 2 × 75). The most recent mammogram was considered the “future” screening round and provided the location of a biopsy-confirmed malignant mass, serving as the ground truth for the training. The two normal previous mammograms (“prior” and “current”) were processed and a new subtracted image was created for the prediction. Region segmentation and post-processing were, then, applied, along with image feature extraction and selection. The selected features were incorporated into several classifiers and by applying leave-one-patient-out and k-fold cross-validation per patient, the regions of interest were characterized as benign or possible future malignancy. Study participants included 75 women (mean age, 62.5 ± 7.2; median age, 62 years). Feature selection from benign and possible future malignancy areas revealed that 14 features provided the best classification. The most accurate classification performance was achieved using ensemble voting, with 98.8% accuracy, 93.6% sensitivity, 98.8% specificity, and 0.96 AUC. Given the success of this algorithm, its clinical application could enable earlier diagnosis and improve prognosis for patients identified as at risk.

Landscape of 2D Deep Learning Segmentation Networks Applied to CT Scan from Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Mehrnia S.S., Safahi Z., Mousavi A., Panahandeh F., Farmani A., Yuan R., Rahmim A., Salmanpour M.R.


A Novel Pipeline for Adrenal Gland Segmentation: Integration of a Hybrid Post-Processing Technique with Deep Learning
Fayemiwo M., Gardiner B., Harkin J., McDaid L., Prakash P., Dennedy M.
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of adrenal glands from CT images is essential for enhancing computer-aided diagnosis and surgical planning. However, the small size, irregular shape, and proximity to surrounding tissues make this task highly challenging. This study introduces a novel pipeline that significantly improves the segmentation of left and right adrenal glands by integrating advanced pre-processing techniques and a robust post-processing framework. Utilising a 2D UNet architecture with various backbones (VGG16, ResNet34, InceptionV3), the pipeline leverages test-time augmentation (TTA) and targeted removal of unconnected regions to enhance accuracy and robustness. Our results demonstrate a substantial improvement, with a 38% increase in the Dice similarity coefficient for the left adrenal gland and an 11% increase for the right adrenal gland on the AMOS dataset, achieved by the InceptionV3 model. Additionally, the pipeline significantly reduces false positives, underscoring its potential for clinical applications and its superiority over existing methods. These advancements make our approach a crucial contribution to the field of medical image segmentation.

Spatial–Temporal Information Fusion for Thyroid Nodule Segmentation in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Novel Approach
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Han B., Yang Q., Tao X., Wu M., Yang L., Deng W., Cui W., Luo D., Wan Q., Liu Z., Zhang N.

Top-100
Citing journals
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
Radiation Medicine and Protection
48 citations, 8.09%
|
|
Cancers
14 citations, 2.36%
|
|
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
12 citations, 2.02%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
12 citations, 2.02%
|
|
International Journal of Radiation Biology
10 citations, 1.69%
|
|
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
10 citations, 1.69%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
9 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Radioprotection
7 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Medical Physics
7 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
7 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Antioxidants
6 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Cells
6 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Physics in Medicine and Biology
5 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
5 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Radiation Research
5 citations, 0.84%
|
|
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
5 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Applied Radiation and Isotopes
5 citations, 0.84%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Journal of Radiological Protection
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Radiography
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Health Physics
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Radiotherapy and Oncology
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
European Physical Journal Plus
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Environmental Research
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Microorganisms
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Frontiers in Physics
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Scientific Reports
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Biomolecules
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Cancer Investigation
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Molecules
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Nutrients
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Pharmaceutics
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Clinical Oncology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Radiation Measurements
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
iScience
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Life Sciences in Space Research
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Arhiv za Higijenu Rada i Toksikologiju
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Blood advances
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Biogerontology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Genes
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Atmosphere
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Foods
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Environmental Pollution
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Biomaterials
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Pineal Research
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Cosmetics
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Medical Dosimetry
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Medicina
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Sustainability
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Translational Medicine
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Sensors
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Construction and Building Materials
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Food Chemistry
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Heliyon
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Toxics
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Physica Medica
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Chemosphere
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Hazardous Materials
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Life
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
PLoS ONE
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Cureus
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Bulletin of the National Research Centre
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
World Journal of Radiology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Биофизика
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Environmental International
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Genes and Environment
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Head and Face Medicine
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Applied Physics Reviews
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Biological Research
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Cancer Letters
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
Citing publishers
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Elsevier
204 citations, 34.4%
|
|
MDPI
86 citations, 14.5%
|
|
Springer Nature
76 citations, 12.82%
|
|
Wiley
35 citations, 5.9%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
27 citations, 4.55%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
23 citations, 3.88%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
10 citations, 1.69%
|
|
IOP Publishing
10 citations, 1.69%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
8 citations, 1.35%
|
|
EDP Sciences
7 citations, 1.18%
|
|
SAGE
5 citations, 0.84%
|
|
AIP Publishing
5 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Radiation Research Society
5 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Oxford University Press
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
4 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
King Saud University
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
American Physiological Society
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Colegio Brasileiro de Reproducao Animal
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
International Research and Cooperation Association for Bio & Socio-Sciences Advancement (IRCA-BSSA)
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
International Dose-Response Society
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics (NAS Ukraine)
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Water Environment Federation
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
PE Polunina Elizareta Gennadievna
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
SPRI of Radiation Hygiene Prof. PV Ramzaev
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Silicea - Poligraf, LLC
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Kemerovo State University
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Science in China Press
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Medknow
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Publishing House ABV Press
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP)
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
The Japan Endocrine Society
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Hans Publishers
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
1 citation, 0.17%
|
|
Show all (30 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
19 publications, 10.05%
|
|
Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention
11 publications, 5.82%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
8 publications, 4.23%
|
|
Fudan University
6 publications, 3.17%
|
|
University of South China
6 publications, 3.17%
|
|
Peking University
5 publications, 2.65%
|
|
Shandong First Medical University
5 publications, 2.65%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
4 publications, 2.12%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
4 publications, 2.12%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Sichuan University
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Nanjing Medical University
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Chengdu Medical College
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Wenzhou Medical University
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Shandong University
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Louisville
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Academy of Military Medical Sciences
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Ibn Zohr University
3 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Chelyabinsk State University
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Central South University
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Capital Medical University
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Second Military Medical University
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Nantong University
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
People's Liberation Army General Hospital and Medical School (301 Hospital)
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of Belgrade
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Siberian State Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Zanjan University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Tsinghua University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Zhejiang University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Jilin University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Giresun University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Sunway University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Wuhan University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Hebei Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
North China University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Western Sydney University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Shenzhen University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Tianjin University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Tianjin Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Shanghai University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Southern Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Guangzhou Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Bengbu Medical College
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Wannan Medical College
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Guizhou Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Anhui University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Shandong Second Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Flinders University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Hassan II Casablanca
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Federal University of Technology Akure
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Babcock University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Harvard University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Ohio State University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of California, Davis
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Cape Coast
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Qinghai Nationalities University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Guangxi Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Xinjiang Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Show all (56 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
China
|
China, 111, 58.73%
China
111 publications, 58.73%
|
USA
|
USA, 14, 7.41%
USA
14 publications, 7.41%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 5, 2.65%
Morocco
5 publications, 2.65%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 4, 2.12%
Russia
4 publications, 2.12%
|
India
|
India, 4, 2.12%
India
4 publications, 2.12%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 1.59%
Iran
3 publications, 1.59%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 1.06%
Australia
2 publications, 1.06%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 1.06%
Austria
2 publications, 1.06%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 1.06%
Serbia
2 publications, 1.06%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.53%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.53%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1, 0.53%
United Kingdom
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Gabon
|
Gabon, 1, 0.53%
Gabon
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.53%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.53%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Congo-Brazzaville
|
Congo-Brazzaville, 1, 0.53%
Congo-Brazzaville
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.53%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.53%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.53%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.53%
Poland
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.53%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Central African Republic
|
Central African Republic, 1, 0.53%
Central African Republic
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.53%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.53%
Japan
1 publication, 0.53%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
|