Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
WOS
Q4
Impact factor
0.7
Years of issue
2024-2025
journal names
Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin
Z PALLIATMEDIZIN
Top-3 citing journals

Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin
(94 citations)

BMC Palliative Care
(79 citations)

Schmerz
(55 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
(65 publications)

University Medical Center Göttingen
(60 publications)

Hannover Medical School
(46 publications)

University Medical Center Göttingen
(29 publications)

Hannover Medical School
(28 publications)

University Hospital Erlangen
(18 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1265

Correction to: Understanding Cybersecurity Management in Healthcare
Progress in IS
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Sharma D.P., Habibi Lashkari A., Parizadeh M.


ERP Systems, Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance
Turulja L., Celjo A., Pejić Bach M., Bajgoric N.
This chapter presents literature review with the aim of developing conceptual models that clarify the role of ERP in the organization, and the relationship between ERP, KM and business performance. Using a systematic literature review (SLR), this chapter presents the current body of knowledge on the impact of ERP on organizational business performance, and then the relationship and logic of the connection between ERP and KM. The chapter describes the fundamental role that ERP systems play in simplifying and combining business processes in companies, thereby providing a framework for knowledge management techniques. These approaches then improve operational efficiency and decision-making capacity, thereby strengthening organizational performance. Emphasizing the need for strategic integration of both to achieve exceptional performance and competitive advantage, the chapter shows how synergy between ERP and KM supports and improves organizational performance.

Enterprise Resource Planning: Information System Perspective
Turulja L., Celjo A., Pejić Bach M., Bajgoric N.
This chapter explores the development and integration of enterprise resource planning (ERP) within the information systems (IS) field, thus offering background knowledge based on a short literature review from selected books/textbooks. Beginning with a historical overview, this chapter follows the beginnings and developmental milestones of ERP systems, emphasizing their central importance in integrating several organizational functions and thereby changing organizational operations. The chapter also highlights the impact of ERP on strategic organizational change and business process reengineering, thus setting the stage for detailed investigations of ERP adoption and its interaction with knowledge management in subsequent chapters. This chapter highlights the theoretical foundations of ERP systems and shows their implications in contemporary corporate environments, bridging the gap between theoretical models and actual implementations.

ERP Adoption
Turulja L., Celjo A., Pejić Bach M., Bajgoric N.
This chapter introduces the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and provides a short history of TAM and TAM-related studies in ERP adoption. The model is widely used for the acceptance of technology, including Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems within organizations. It analyses major adoption success factors suggested in the literature and presents the phases of ERP adoption and related sub-steps and methods. This chapter concludes by providing the all stages and corresponding documentation for successful practical ERP adoption.

ERP and Knowledge Management
Turulja L., Celjo A., Pejić Bach M., Bajgoric N.
This chapter aims at analyzing the adoption factors from the Knowledge Management (KM) perspective for successful Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) adoption. It provides an overview of how knowledge is created and classified. Further, it explains knowledge creation and transfer through ERP. Implementing ERP systems and KM may bring several advantages in modern business. Through advanced modules and technology, ERP systems integrate business processes to optimize operations. KM and ERP systems work together as a bridge in linking and integration information systems with cognitive assets of the company. Chapter concludes with overview of usual KM activities and knowledge conversion dimension across ERP adoption stages.

Empirical Research
Turulja L., Celjo A., Pejić Bach M., Bajgoric N.
This chapter, first, proposes and then empirically tests two separate models related to ERP systems and knowledge management (KM) and their impact on organizational performance. Incorporating the culture of knowledge sharing and based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Model I, the ERP Acceptance Model, explores how these elements influence ERP acceptance. Model II, called the strategic ERP & KM synergy model, focuses on the combined impact of ERP and KM on organizational performance, looking at how ERP systems and KM practices interact. Using thorough empirical research, this chapter offers a comprehensive study of the interactions between several dimensions of knowledge management with ERP functions to improve operational performance and strategic decision-making.

Analysis of Customer Behavior
Wasilewski A.
To provide a customized user interface in e-commerce, it is essential to obtain knowledge about customers, including their behaviors, preferences, and decision-making processes. To achieve this, it is imperative to collect data on all users’ actions within the e-shop. This data collection should be conducted with utmost respect for customer privacy and adherence to legal requirements. One viable method for gathering this data involves using cookies with the prior consent of clients, in conjunction with tag management tools and web analytics. The information thus acquired can then be examined to identify patterns and dependencies, allowing for the classification of customers based on their behavior. Various grouping techniques can be used for this purpose, with the choice of the appropriate algorithm depending on the dataset—a crucial factor in advancing interface variant implementation. Additionally, the UX specialist should utilize the gathered data on user behavior to suggest modifications that will mold the interface variants offered to specific consumer segments. This chapter outlines methods for collecting customer behavioral data in online retail environments, delves into clustering as a technique for grouping users based on their behavior, and highlights current and potential applications of this approach in e-commerce. The chapter also explores ways to analyze the resulting clusters in terms of their utility for designing specialized layout variants.

Designing and Serving a Dedicated Interface
Wasilewski A.
From the perspective of an e-shop customer, the most prominent aspect of a multi-interface solution is the availability of interface variants offered to specific user groups. The design of these variants should not be arbitrary but based on an analysis of the collective traits of customer clusters and the typical behavior exhibited by members of these groups. Consequently, it is imperative to establish both a flexible and an efficient mechanism for crafting modifications to UI variants and a means of accessing information concerning characteristics that may influence the deployment of specific changes. Given that the impact of UI changes on customer behavior cannot be definitively assessed ex ante, it is necessary to devise a method for evaluating the quality of proposed UI variants. This evaluation should take into account the choices made and the behavior of users who have been exposed to the personalization. It plays a pivotal role in deciding whether to retain or withdraw the modifications. By relying on a list of potential changes and the values of selected indicators obtained through a tool that assesses their impact on purchasing decisions, one can iteratively seek the optimal user interface variants for each customer cluster. In practice, this iterative process can lead to the development of a self-adaptive mechanism that utilizes a multivariant user interface to automatically fine-tune the implemented UI modifications to suit the unique characteristics of individual e-commerce customer clusters. This chapter delves into a practical methodology for crafting custom e-commerce user interface variants. It outlines the process of translating the attributes of the identified customer clusters and their behaviors into tailored layout modifications. Furthermore, it explores methods for quantifying the efficacy of implemented UI changes and proposes algorithms that facilitate the self-adaptation of e-commerce UI variants.

Evaluation of a Multivariant Interface Implementation
Wasilewski A.
Multivariate user interfaces offer a dynamic way to personalize users’ experiences by adapting to their preferences and behavior. Nonetheless, implementing them demands robust justifications for such an investment. Given that web shops infrequently provide various interface versions and the business implications of this approach remain insufficiently explored, testing the proposed solution in practice is essential. The verification process must cover all aspects of the mechanism, with special emphasis on choosing the most suitable clustering method and assessing the effects of UI variants on the performance indicators employed in e-commerce. On the one hand, the research should confirm the viability of the proposed concept and methods of preparing and serving customized UI variations. On the other hand, it should serve as a foundation for future research and development aimed at personalizing the user interface in e-commerce. This chapter presents the background of the research and describes the study work carried out. The first set of experimental studies concerned the selection of the optimal clustering method. The results obtained allowed the selection of two algorithms, which were applied during the second stage of the research. This included a practical verification of the impact of dedicated user interface variants on different customer groups and confirmed that the use of layout personalization in e-commerce can yield positive business results.

Introduction to the Personalization in E-commerce
Wasilewski A.
E-commerce is becoming an increasingly preferred method of conducting commercial transactions worldwide, and its importance continues to grow. The ability to access potential customers around the world serves as the impetus for discovering novel channels to reach out to buyers and entice them to make a purchase. Personalization, which involves modifying presented content to fulfill the specific needs, requirements, behaviors, or preferences of the user, is one such approach. Personalization can have various technical implementations but requires knowledge of the target recipient. However, obtaining customer information cannot compromise their right to privacy. Stringent legal regulations and market trends currently safeguard this privacy, but the existing standards provide opportunities for a compromise that allows for personalization in e-commerce while respecting the privacy of the customer. This chapter begins with a general introduction to the topic of e-commerce. It then identifies the development trends that are increasing the practical importance of personalization. In the following chapters, the technical aspects of website personalization, as well as the challenges for personalization arising from the growing importance of customer privacy and data protection, are discussed.

Recommendation System for Multivariant E-Commerce Interfaces
Wasilewski A.
The main objective of e-commerce activities is to sell products or services and possibly provide after-sales service. Depending on how this is achieved, various methods of personalizing communications are employed. Customized content or design is sometimes practiced in online shops, B2B sales platforms, auction portals, or marketplaces. Some popular approaches to personalization in e-commerce include product recommendations, dedicated ads, or emails. Occasionally, other solutions are also implemented based on business owner decisions. Most current solutions primarily focus on personalizing content, and the ability to provide a holistic dedicated user interface is less commonly utilized. However, the potential of personalizing layouts by offering multiple UI variants in e-commerce seems underestimated. Undoubtedly, such an approach requires a system architecture design capable of meeting potential users’ requirements. The proposed solution should be modular and scalable, minimizing barriers to entry. A possible starting point for developing a framework to serve dedicated user interfaces could be the recommendation systems used in today’s e-commerce. This chapter discusses the applications of recommender systems and introduces various approaches to using multivariant user interfaces in e-commerce. An analysis of typical modules of recommender systems is provided, with a particular focus on components critical for delivering dedicated layouts. A solution architecture is proposed that enables the practical implementation of the concept of serving user interface variants tailored to the decisions and behaviors of specific groups of e-commerce customers.

Cybersecurity Challenges, Best Practices, and Future Work in Healthcare
Sharma D.P., Habibi Lashkari A., Parizadeh M.
As healthcare professionals, IT professionals, and decision-makers in healthcare organizations, your role in exploring and addressing the potential security and privacy concerns in healthcare systems is crucial and highly valued (Jawad, 2024). Figure 10.1 shows the key potential cybersecurity concerns in digital healthcare systems. These common potential security concerns and the best practices that are used to ensure security and privacy in the healthcare industry are discussed as follows:

Cybersecurity Risk Analysis, Assessment, and Mitigation
Sharma D.P., Habibi Lashkari A., Parizadeh M.
Cybersecurity risk analysis identifies, assesses, and prioritizes potential cyber threats, vulnerabilities, risks, and their impact on information confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The main goal of cybersecurity risk analysis is to develop strategies for managing and mitigating those risks effectively. A healthcare organization can better protect patient data, ensure the integrity of medical services, and contribute to overall patient safety by adopting a proactive and comprehensive approach to cybersecurity risk analysis, assessment, and mitigation strategies. This chapter presents an organizational approach for analyzing cybersecurity risks, assessment, and mitigation strategies in the healthcare industry.

Cybersecurity Governance and Ethics
Sharma D.P., Habibi Lashkari A., Parizadeh M.
Data governance is the specification of decision rights and an accountability framework to ensure the appropriate behavior in the valuation, creation, consumption, and control of data and analytics (Gartner, 2024). It refers to the exercise of authority and control over the management of data. Data governance aims to increase data value and minimize data-related costs and risks. In the healthcare context, it is a collection of procedures and plans that ensure the availability, integrity, security, and usability of the structured and unstructured data available to the healthcare organization. The best data governance practice outlines the healthcare data governance framework, guiding principles, organization-wide applications, and best practices. It is not a new topic, but it is still challenging for many healthcare organizations to implement and achieve (Oachs, 2020). Healthcare data governance includes the people, processes, and systems used to manage data throughout the lifecycle. Figure 9.1 shows the data governance lifecycle of a healthcare organization (AHIMA, 2022). The data lifecycle includes creation, process, use, storage/archival, or disposal. It also involves defining policies and procedures for data retention, archival, and disposal following regulatory requirements.

Detection and Prevention of Cyberattacks in Healthcare
Sharma D.P., Habibi Lashkari A., Parizadeh M.
Detection and prevention of cyberattacks in healthcare are crucial to protect sensitive patient data and ensure the integrity and availability of healthcare systems and services. The healthcare industry is a prime target for cyberattacks. There are some reasons why the healthcare industry is the prime target (Bhosale, 2021).
Top-100
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin
94 citations, 5.87%
|
|
BMC Palliative Care
79 citations, 4.93%
|
|
Schmerz
55 citations, 3.44%
|
|
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
38 citations, 2.37%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
33 citations, 2.06%
|
|
Gesundheitswesen
32 citations, 2%
|
|
Der Anaesthesist
24 citations, 1.5%
|
|
Ethik in der Medizin
23 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Onkologe
21 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Palliative Medicine
20 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Supportive Care in Cancer
20 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie
19 citations, 1.19%
|
|
MMW Fortschritte der Medizin
18 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
17 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Die Onkologie
17 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Journal of Palliative Medicine
15 citations, 0.94%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
15 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Gesundheit und Nachhaltigkeit
15 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin
13 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Healthcare
12 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
12 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Children
11 citations, 0.69%
|
|
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
10 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Schmerzmedizin
10 citations, 0.62%
|
|
PLoS ONE
9 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Pflege
8 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Wege zum Menschen
8 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Palliative and Supportive Care
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Der Nervenarzt
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Forum
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Die Anaesthesiologie
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Onkologie
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
BMJ Open
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Verhaltenstherapie
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Public Health Forum
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
PPmP Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Palliative Medicine Reports
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
BMC Medical Education
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Der Internist
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Palliative Care and Social Practice
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Notfall und Rettungsmedizin
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
BMC Nursing
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Spiritual Care
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Der Gynakologe
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BMC Family Practice
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Advanced Nursing
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Best Practice Onkologie
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Brain Sciences
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Palliative Nursing
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Chirurg
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Health Policy
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Psychotherapeut
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
BMC Medical Ethics
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Progress in Palliative Care
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
European Journal of Cancer Care
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Gastroenterologe
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of International Medical Research
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Anästhesie Nachrichten
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
intensiv
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Advances in Social Sciences
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Musiktherapeutische Umschau
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Leidfaden
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Böse Eltern
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
The Lancet Oncology
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Palliative Care
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Nursing Ethics
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Frontiers in Neurology
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Nephrologe
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Mortality
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Tumor Diagnostik und Therapie
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Patient Preference and Adherence
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Palliative Care
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Annals of palliative medicine
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
BMC Geriatrics
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
European Journal of General Practice
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Der Urologe
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
BMC Public Health
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Nurse Education in Practice
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Social Work Education
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Patient Education and Counseling
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
JDDG - Journal of the German Society of Dermatology
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Age and Ageing
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
HNO
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Swiss Political Science Review
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Life
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
BMC Primary Care
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
Springer Nature
531 citations, 33.17%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
165 citations, 10.31%
|
|
Elsevier
90 citations, 5.62%
|
|
SAGE
45 citations, 2.81%
|
|
MDPI
34 citations, 2.12%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
21 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Wiley
20 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
17 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co, KG
16 citations, 1%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
15 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
13 citations, 0.81%
|
|
BMJ
12 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
11 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
9 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Hans Publishers
9 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
8 citations, 0.5%
|
|
S. Karger AG
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Oxford University Press
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
JMIR Publications
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IntechOpen
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Emerald
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Begell House
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Society for Translational Oncology
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Aran Ediciones SA
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
University of Ostrava Faculty of Medicine
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
PANORAMA Publishing House
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
The Japan Sociological Society
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Periodontal Association - RPA
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (10 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
65 publications, 1.72%
|
|
University Medical Center Göttingen
60 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Hannover Medical School
46 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University Hospital Erlangen
45 publications, 1.19%
|
|
München Klinik
27 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Cologne University Hospital
26 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University Hospital Bonn
24 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Witten/Herdecke University
23 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
23 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University Hospital Düsseldorf
23 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
20 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
20 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
19 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University Hospital Heidelberg
15 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Cologne
13 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University Hospital Aachen
13 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Jena University Hospital
12 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University Hospital Würzburg
12 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University Medical Center Freiburg
11 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Essen University Hospital
11 publications, 0.29%
|
|
King's College London
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Universitätsmedizin Rostock
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
9 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
9 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University Hospital Münster
8 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
8 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Augsburg
8 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Helmholtz Zentrum München
7 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
7 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Göttingen
7 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
7 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
7 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Klinikum Stuttgart
7 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Paracelsus Medical University
7 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Greifswald University Hospital
6 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Klagenfurt
6 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
5 publications, 0.13%
|
|
University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg
5 publications, 0.13%
|
|
University Hospital Regensburg
5 publications, 0.13%
|
|
BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum
5 publications, 0.13%
|
|
UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
5 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University Hospital Ulm
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Greifswald
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Heidelberg University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Heidelberg University of Education
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University Hospital of Zürich
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Zurich
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Münster
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Philipps University of Marburg
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University Hospital Leipzig
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Rostock
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus–Senftenberg
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Lübeck
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Siegen
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
FH Münster – University of Applied Sciences
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Leipzig University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Graz
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University Hospital Tübingen
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Justus Liebig University Giessen
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University Hospital Augsburg
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Osnabrück University
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University Hospital Magdeburg
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of Vienna
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
University of Bern
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
University Children’s Hospital Basel
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
University Children's Hospital Zurich
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
University of Liverpool
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
University of Bergen
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Technical University of Dortmund
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Harvard University
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Chemnitz University of Technology
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Lancaster University
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Technical University of Braunschweig
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Hamburg University
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
München Klinik Schwabing
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
University Hospital Frankfurt
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Saarland University
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
University Medical Centre Mannheim
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
1 publication, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
University Medical Center Göttingen
29 publications, 3.55%
|
|
Hannover Medical School
28 publications, 3.43%
|
|
University Hospital Erlangen
18 publications, 2.21%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
15 publications, 1.84%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
14 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Cologne University Hospital
10 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University Hospital Bonn
8 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University Hospital Düsseldorf
8 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University Hospital Aachen
8 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Cologne
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Essen University Hospital
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
6 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University Hospital Würzburg
6 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Universitätsmedizin Rostock
6 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Witten/Herdecke University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
München Klinik
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University Hospital Münster
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University Hospital Heidelberg
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Helmholtz Zentrum München
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University Hospital Regensburg
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Augsburg
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Paracelsus Medical University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Heidelberg University of Education
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Jena University Hospital
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University Medical Center Freiburg
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University Hospital Ulm
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Göttingen
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Philipps University of Marburg
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University Hospital Leipzig
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Greifswald University Hospital
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University Hospital Augsburg
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus–Senftenberg
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Siegen
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Leipzig University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Graz
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
University Hospital of Zürich
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
University of Bern
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Technical University of Dortmund
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Chemnitz University of Technology
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
München Klinik Schwabing
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
University Hospital Frankfurt
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
University Medical Centre Mannheim
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
University of Lübeck
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
University Hospital Magdeburg
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
FH Münster – University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Klinikum Stuttgart
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
University of Vienna
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
University of Hull
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (42 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Germany
|
Germany, 625, 16.5%
Germany
625 publications, 16.5%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 49, 1.29%
Austria
49 publications, 1.29%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 28, 0.74%
Italy
28 publications, 0.74%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 20, 0.53%
Switzerland
20 publications, 0.53%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 12, 0.32%
United Kingdom
12 publications, 0.32%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 0.11%
Netherlands
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.08%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.08%
|
USA
|
USA, 2, 0.05%
USA
2 publications, 0.05%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.03%
France
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.03%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.03%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.03%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.03%
Norway
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.03%
Poland
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.03%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.03%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.03%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.03%
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Germany
|
Germany, 212, 25.98%
Germany
212 publications, 25.98%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 27, 3.31%
Italy
27 publications, 3.31%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 12, 1.47%
Austria
12 publications, 1.47%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 0.49%
Switzerland
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.25%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.25%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.25%
|
USA
|
USA, 1, 0.12%
USA
1 publication, 0.12%
|
50
100
150
200
250
|