Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
2.3
SJR
0.659
CiteScore
4.3
Categories
Philosophy
Education
Health Policy
Health (social science)
Areas
Arts and Humanities
Medicine
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1998-2025
journal names
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
MED HEALTH CARE PHIL
Top-3 citing journals

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
(1098 citations)

BMC Medical Ethics
(365 citations)

Journal of Medical Ethics
(319 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Oslo
(65 publications)

University of Zurich
(61 publications)

Linköping University
(50 publications)

Duquesne University
(18 publications)

Dublin City University
(17 publications)

University of Copenhagen
(11 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 464
Q3

A Novel Scale to Measure Nursing Students’ Fear of Artificial Intelligence: Development and Validation
Albikawi Z., Abuadas M.
Background
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare is revolutionizing patient care and clinical practice, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility. However, it has also sparked concerns among nursing students about job displacement, reliance on technology, and the potential loss of human qualities like empathy and compassion, to this date, there is no established scale measuring the level of fear, especially among nursing students.
Aim
To develop and validate a scale to assess nursing students' fear of artificial intelligence.
Methods
The current study employed a cross-sectional design, involving a total of 225 Saudi nursing students enrolled in a nursing college. The scale's construct, convergent, and discriminant validity were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
Results
A comprehensive review of the literature addressing fear of AI guided the development of the Fear Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (FtAIS). An initial pool of items was subjected to a content validity assessment by an expert panel, which refined the scale to 10 items categorized into two dimensions: job issues and humanity. The two-factor structure was responsible for 73.52% of the total variance. The scale items' reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, yielding a value of 0.803. The reliability coefficients for the two subscales, job issues, and humanity, are 0.804 and 0.801, respectively. The confirmatory factor model demonstrated a good model fit. The scale's convergent and discriminant validity were both confirmed.
Conclusion
The FtAIS is a rigorously developed and validated tool for measuring nursing students' fears toward AI. These findings emphasize the need for targeted educational interventions and training programs that could mitigate AI-related fears and prepare nursing students for its integration into healthcare. The scale offers practical applications for educators and policymakers in addressing AI fear and fostering its confident adoption to enhance patient care and healthcare outcomes.
Q3

Educational Content Focusing on Basic Skills for Novice Nurses to Work Independently in Intensive Care Units in Japan: A Qualitative Study
Imamura S., Tsujimoto T., Fujii M., Takeshita Y., Nagayasu M., Inoue T.
Introduction/Objectives
In Japan, novice nurses are assigned to intensive care units immediately after graduation and are expected to become independent within about a year. Therefore, in addition to long-term, comprehensive educational programs, establishing an educational system that allows novice nurses to learn intensive care unit nursing while working is necessary. This study explored senior nurses’ expectations for novice nurses working independently in the intensive care unit after one year and identified the foundational skills needed for novice nurses to achieve this independence.
Methods
The research collaborators were eight senior nurses working in the intensive care unit of an acute care hospital. They were recruited from four facilities and had five or more years of clinical experience. The study used semi-structured interviews to generate data about the reports, contacts, and consultations they would expect from novice nurses to determine their readiness to become independent.
Results
This study clarified the circumstances under which novice nurses with no practical experience should voluntarily seek support to work as independent nurses one year after being assigned to an intensive care unit. It reflects the characteristics of patients who require intensive management, such as “assistance with central line insertion and removal” and “evaluation of vital signs,” as well as other advanced procedures.
Conclusion
This study clarified the basic skills required for novice nurses and identified the areas in which they should seek support. In the future, this method may be utilized in the early stages of novice nurse education.
Q3

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Resilience Training among Nursing Professionals in Saudi Arabia
Alanazi H.Q., Alreshidi N.M., Alrimali A.M., Alshammari W.D., Elsharif N.E., Teodosio M.T., Gonzales K.A., Gaspar F.B., Tabungar D.M., Alshammri M.A.
Introduction
Nursing is a demanding profession that calls for resilience and stress management. Nevertheless, many nurses do not receive adequate training in these areas. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of resilience training programs on work-related stress and resilience levels among nurses in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
A quasi-experiment intervention study employing pre- and post-test approaches was conducted from January to March, 2024, to assess a resilience training program for nurses in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Fifty nurses from sixteen hospitals were divided into two groups in the stratified random sample: the intervention group (n = 25) and the control group (n = 25). Data was collected using an online survey at baseline and three months post-training, with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and the Expanded Nursing Stress Scale employed for measuring outcomes. The paired samples t-tests for statistical analysis were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0.
Results
Significant improvements were noted in the intervention group, with resilience sores improving to 79.50 from 77.12 (p = 0.015) and stress levels decreasing to 63.54 from 65.08 (p = 0.020). No significant changes were noted in the control group.
Conclusion
Findings indicate that resilience training programs can significantly enhance resilience levels and reduce work-related stress. These results underscore the importance of implementing structured resilience training to better equip nurses for the challenges of their demanding profession.
Q3

Diagnostic Accuracy Comparison between Automatic and Conventional Blood Pressure Measuring Devices in Adults with Hypertension
Curi-Curi P.J., Santiago-González N., Valencia-Ledezma O.E., García-Rascon R., Hernandez-Roque E., Oliver-Flores E.Y., Curiel-Ramirez G.
Background
Blood pressure measurement is a main clinical procedure used for the detection of Systemic Arterial Hypertension. Mercury sphygmomanometer, in combination with auscultation technique, is still recognized as the gold standard for non-invasive blood pressure measurement.
Objective
The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy between automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices versus mercury sphygmomanometers in hospitalized patients.
Methods
A prospective, analytical and cross-sectional diagnostic method study was designed to compare the concordance, positive and negative predictive value, the sensitivity and specificity of automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices and the mercury sphygmomanometer. The devices were divided into two groups: the reference standard which was mercury sphygmomanometer (n=150), versus the index tests, that were wrist device (n=150), semi-automatic sphygmomanometer (n=150) and vital signs monitor (n=150).
Results
The monitor detected more cases (69%) of systemic arterial hypertension (p 0.0019, OR 5.3). The semiautomatic sphygmomanometer identified more true positives (n=22) and true negatives (n=113). It also showed a higher diagnostic accuracy: 67% sensitivity (p 0.0576, OR 0.5) and 97% specificity (p 0.088, OR 3.2). A mean arterial pressure variation <5mmHg of 65% was found with the semiautomatic sphygmomanometer (p <0.0001, OR 0.02) and 61% with the vital signs monitor (p <0.0001, OR 0.12). Best concordance of blood pressure between reference standard versus index test was obtained in the following order: Semi-automatic sphygmomanometer, Vital signs monitor, and Wrist device.
Conclusion
The use of vital signs monitor to measure blood pressure is recommended in all patients, although semiautomatic sphygmomanometer is more sensitive for the detection of systemic arterial hypertension.
Q3

Transforming Nursing Practice to Optimize Care of Patients with Tuberculosis and Associated Comorbidities in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania
Shayo P.M., Zewdie E.A., Byashalira K.C., Chamba N.G., Mbelele P.M., Bygbjerg I.C., Lillebaek T., Christensen D.L., Heysell S.K., Mpagama S.G.
Background
Managing tuberculosis (TB) patients with comorbidities requires a holistic and patient-centered approach. This study evaluated patient-centered care (PCC) experiences among TB patients with multimorbidity under the Adaptive Diseases Control Expert Program in Tanzania (ADEPT), with a focus on the TB/diabetes mellitus (DM) co-epidemic targeted by the program.
Methods
A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted involving TB patients with associated comorbidities receiving care from nurses trained in PCC through the ADEPT program. Patients were assessed for their interpretation of how they received PCC across eight dimensions of care.
Results
All 39 participants with TB had at least one comorbidity (100%). The most common multi-morbidities were TB/HIV (59.0%) and TB/DM (12.8%). Evaluation of needs, values, and preferences revealed that participants strongly felt healthcare workers considered these aspects (mean score = 4.53; scale 1 minimum- strongly disagree to 5 maximum- strongly agree). Subsequent analysis showed varying evaluations across dimensions. Patients reported robust endorsement for receiving care that involved family and friends, with mean scores of 4.04, and for access to care, with a mean score of 4.40. However, physical comfort, coordination, continuity of care, education and emotional support received comparatively lower rankings.
Conclusion
TB patients with multimorbidity under the ADEPT program experienced PCC. However, certain systemic issues such as physical spaces, coordination, transition of care, and information education did not meet patient’s needs in their own assessment, indicating opportunities for further quality improvement. Scaling up the ADEPT program within healthcare systems is likely to enhance care provision for TB patients with multimorbidity through a patient-centered approach.
Q3

Psychiatric Care Setting from the Perspective of Psychiatric Nursing Managers
Vieira L.C., Bocchi S.C., MacPhee M., Spiri W.C.
Background
Nursing managers are well-positioned to enhance holistic care for patients in psychiatric settings. Managers need to use evidence-based data available to them when making nurse staffing decisions. Patient classification systems can be an excellent source of patients’ priority care needs.
Objective
To understand the meaning of using patient classification systems as a management tool for psychiatric nursing managers.
Methods
Qualitative study with a content analysis methodological framework. Ten nursing managers from psychiatric institutions in the state of São Paulo participated. Data were collected between August 2016 and May 2017 using a semi-structured interview with recorded audio.
Results
The sample consisted of nine women and one man with an average of 14 years’ experience in mental health and seven years of management experience. The psychiatric care setting emerged as a general theme surrounded by four subthemes: current model of decision making, ideal model of decision making, nursing staff dimensioning/staffing, and professional and mental health legislation. Only half of the managers used a patient classification system as a management tool, and there were difficulties associated with their use of the tool.
Conclusion
A conceptual model was developed based on the themes, subthemes, categories, and sub-categories in this study. The model demonstrates major differences between psychiatric settings with biomedical models versus psychosocial models. Managers with knowledge of PCS data can better advocate for patients’ holistic needs and adequate nursing resource allocation. Managers may lack the knowledge and skills required for model transformation, and continuing management/leadership education is recommended.
Q3

The Development of a Cultural-based Questionnaire for Drug Use Prevention Programs for Adolescents: A Delphi Study
Tahlil T., Hadi N., Maulina, Marlina
Objective
This study aimed to identify a valid and cultural-based questionnaire for drug use prevention programs for adolescents.
Methods
The study used a three-round Delphi technique. A total of 21 participants with knowledge and experiences in community nursing (11 nurses) and education for junior high school students (11 teachers) in Aceh Province, Indonesia, were included. For the first round, focus group discussions were conducted. For the second round, participants were asked to indicate their levels of agreement and provide their comments on the proposed questionnaire. For the third round, participants were instructed to indicate their level of agreement with the final version of the developed questionnaire. The consensus was defined based on the percent agreement.
Results
Initially, 64 questions for four domains (knowledge = 14 items, attitude = 29 items, intention = 9 items, behaviors = 12 items) were developed based on the FGDs and literature review. Finally, the four domains and 43 questions (knowledge = 14 items, attitude = 12 items, intention = 9 items, behaviours = 8 items) were supported by the group panels as the final instrument for the evaluation of drug use prevention programs for adolescents in schools.
Conclusion
Expert panels validated the content of the questionnaire for the drug use prevention programs in Indonesia. Nonetheless, further analysis and implementation of the instrument are required to identify the accuracy of the instrument.
Q3

Understanding the Relationship Between Care Quality Perception and Patient Safety Culture
Janghorban A., Moghri J., Ghavami V., Raesi R., Tabatabaee S.S.
Background
Assessing the perceived quality of care and safety culture by nurses is an important part of nursing practice and is vital for improving the quality of nursing care.
Aim
This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted using stratified and convenience sampling techniques from March 2023 to January 2024 among 412 nurses working in hospitals at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The data collection tools were standard care behavior questionnaires (CBI-42) and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical tests at a significance level of 0.05.
Results
The perceived quality of care among nurses was high, with a score of 4.79 (1-6). The highest score was in “knowledge and professional skill” (5.03), while “communication and positive attitude” scored the lowest (4.59). Patient safety culture averaged 3.35 (1-5), with “overall perception of patient safety” at 4.82 and “non-punitive response to error” at 2.40. A significant direct relationship was found between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture (r=0.226, p<0.001), indicating that improvements in one may enhance the other.
Conclusion
Due to the existence of a direct relationship between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture, appropriate training and using the experiences of others, improving the relationship between nurses and patients, creating a sense of security in nurses, and solving the problems of nurses can enhance the quality of health care services.
Q3

Adherence to Radiation Protection Principles in the Clinical Environment among Anesthesia and Operating Room Nursing Students: Implications for Educational Interventions
Ghasemi S., Khosravi H., Imani B., Shabani N.
Background
The increasing use of ionizing radiation in clinical environments, particularly during surgeries such as orthopedics and neurosurgery, has heightened concerns about the potential health risks associated with this type of radiation. This issue is particularly relevant for nursing students undergoing training in operating room settings, where they are frequently exposed to various sources of radiation. To effectively implement radiation protection principles, it is crucial to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of the students toward ionizing radiation. Understanding their level of awareness and beliefs about radiation safety will inform the development of targeted training programs aimed at minimizing exposure and enhancing safety in clinical environments.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and performance of 8th-semester undergraduate anesthesia and operating room nursing students toward radiation protection principles.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2024. In this study, students were selected via the census sampling method. The data related to the study were collected from valid questionnaires concerning the participants’ level of knowledge, attitudes, and performance toward ionizing radiation. The data analysis was also conducted at the descriptive and inferential statistics level via SPSS version 16 software.
Results
The knowledge, attitudes, and performance of the students in both fields were inadequate compared to the ideal standards. Additionally, the mean attitude score toward protective principles was significantly greater among operating room nursing students than anesthesia nursing students (p-value = 0.023). Furthermore, a positive and significant correlation was found between students' Grade Point Average (GPA) and their scores on knowledge and attitudes toward protective principles (r = 0.449, p-value = 0.000 and r = 0.648, p-value = 0.000, respectively).
Conclusion
This study revealed that the level of knowledge among students regarding ionizing radiation is lower than the desired standards for ensuring safety in clinical environments. As a result, it is essential to implement targeted training courses to enhance students' understanding of the risks associated with ionizing radiation.
Q3

The Effect of Emotional Intelligence, Caring Efficacy, and Social Support on Clinical Competency of Nursing Students
Park J., Rajaguru V., Kim J.
Aim
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of emotional intelligence, caring efficacy, and social support on the clinical competency of Korean nursing students.
Methods
We conducted a descriptive correlational study from 5th March to 10th June 10, 2020, among 257 nursing students in 3rd and 4th years who participated in clinical practice at four universities in two cities. We collected the data using a self-structured questionnaire that included 129 items from the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), the General Self-efficacy (GSE) scale, and scales on social support and clinical competency. We analyzed the data using frequency analysis, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression analysis.
Results
The majority of the students, i.e., 80.2%, were female, 57.6% were in their 3rd year, and the students’ average age ranged from 22.91 to 4.75. The participants’ clinical competency was linked to their emotional intelligence (r =.457; p<.001), their ability to care for others (r =.516; p<.001), and their social support (r =.515; p^.001). There was a statistically significant difference in clinical competency based on the participants’ religion, academic performance, and satisfaction with their major and clinical practice. Factors, such as care efficacy, social support, emotional intelligence, religion, and significant satisfaction, influenced clinical competency.
Conclusion
Overall, 39.3% of the participants demonstrated clinical competency. The results have highlighted the need for the development of an effective educational program that can enhance emotional intelligence, care efficacy, social support, and major satisfaction, thereby promoting the clinical competency of nursing students.
Q3

Communication Methods Used with Conscious Intubated Patients: Scoping Review
Karmakar M., Panduragan S.L., Said F.M.
Background
Intubated conscious patients often experience communication difficulties. The present narrative review outlines the current evidence on communication methods adopted and the experience of conscious intubated patients in critical care areas.
Objectives
To our knowledge, studies have attempted to examine communication with conscious intubated patients. The present review had two objectives: (1) to identify the methods adopted by nurses and conscious intubated patients to ease the communication difficulties faced due to intubation and (2) to identify the experience of nurses and conscious intubated patients with the adopted communication methods.
Methods
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was followed throughout this review. PubMed and ProQuest databases were searched with the terms “intubated conscious patients,” “communication,” and “nurse”, including original research articles published between January 2019 and May 2024 on conscious patients needing intubation. Dissertations, review papers, non-interventional research, and articles written in languages other than English were excluded. Only eight of the original 2,041 studies, which included 137 intubated patients and for 545 nurses, met the inclusion criteria. The authors used the Mixed Method Appraisal tool (MMAT) and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) to collect data and assess quality.
Results
After the first search of generated 2041 papers, only eight articles—representing various studies—were able to meet the inclusion requirements. The included studies were six (6) quantitative, one (1) qualitative study and one (1) mixed-method study. Four communication intervention types were identified, namely: (1) Communication boards/charts (two studies), which improved communication and increased patient satisfaction. (2) Gestures and facial expressions (four studies) were reported to be frequently initiated for communication by the nurses with the patients. (3) Multiple methods (three studies) used were found to be insufficient to communicate with the patients. (4) Digital technology program, including Communicative Digital Technology Program was found to be effective means of communication in three such studies.
Conclusion
Results imply that communication techniques may be useful in enhancing patient–nursing professional communication with conscious intubated patients. However, in developing countries with fewer resources, a low-cost communication tool addressing both physical and emotional needs may be developed to aid in communication among patients and nurses.
Q3

A Case Report on Placenta Accreta: Developing a Conceptual Framework
Alzboon G., Kawafha M., Al Maghaireh D., Alhamory S.
Introduction
Placenta accreta is a pathological condition of the placenta associated with multiple maternal and neonatal complications, but its diagnosis and treatment have been sparsely reported from the nursing viewpoint. This report describes a case of placenta accreta from the nursing perspective to develop a conceptual framework of care.
Case Presentation
Our case involved a 37-year-old pregnant woman with four previous caesarean sections and a previous in vitro fertilisation. She was diagnosed with placenta accreta only in the operating theatre during a scheduled caesarean section, and she had not performed thorough antenatal care as in her previous pregnancies despite having significant symptoms, such as severe urinary incontinence. The patient experienced many complications during the caesarean section, including bladder injury, massive haemorrhage, and hysterectomy.
Conclusion
We develop a theoretical framework illustrating the core factors that influence the management of placenta accreta and associated maternal morbidities. This model highlights the distinction between patient characteristics, nurse characteristics, organisational factors, and pregnancy outcomes and shows their relationship to the diagnosis and prevention of placenta accreta. The model has important implications for research and practice, and the case reminds nurses of their recommended interventions to diagnose, manage, and prevent placenta accreta. The quality of care for placenta accreta cases should be promoted through the assessment of patients, nurses, and organisational factors and the application of prevention measures.
Q3

Development of Community Participation Program on Knowledge and Health Prevention Behaviors Related to Hypertension among Hill Tribe Older Adults in Northern Thailand
Panya P., Yaemmisri W., Viriyaratanakul B., Praison P., Gantagad T., Sareeso P., Guntapan N., Nuansaard I.
Background
The Akha hill tribe of older adults in Thailand, a culturally diverse minority, faces health disparities. Due to limited access to health information and services, those who are unable to read Thai are at a higher risk of developing hypertension. Consequently, hill tribe communities need community engagement to enhance healthcare access and communication between health workers and the community.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the effect of a community participation program on hypertension knowledge and health prevention behaviors among Akha older adults in Thailand.
Methods
This program was developed based on evidence and insights from community scholars and stakeholders. The program included three activities: 1] training the volunteers, 2] home visits by trained adolescent and adult volunteers, and 3] providing hypertension knowledge through village broadcasts. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted using an Akha-specific hypertension knowledge and prevention behaviors questionnaire.
Results
Among the thirty healthy Akha older adults who could not communicate in Thai, following the implementation of the community participation program, there was a significant increase in hypertension knowledge (P = 0.000) and HT prevention behaviors (P = 0.017).
Conclusion
The community participation program could improve hypertension knowledge and hypertension prevention behaviors of older adults in the Akha hill tribe by bridging the gap between the healthcare system and the community.
Q3

Role of the Nursing Professional in Euthanasia: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Avila M.I., Díaz Chavarro B.C., Campo A.P., Vargas Murillo S.M.
Background
Until the date of the search, Euthanasia was legally accepted in 5 countries: the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Canada and Colombia.
Objective
We aimed to identify the role of nurses in euthanasia based on articles published both nationally and internationally between 2014 and 2022.
Methods
Qualitative and quantitative studies, editorials, literature reviews and Colombian regulations were included. Publications that did not meet the criteria of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement and the Spanish Critical Appraisal Skills Programme were excluded. In total, 57 articles were evaluated and 19 were selected. Appropriate copyright principles were followed in accordance with Colombian Law 23 of 1982.
Results
With the data obtained, 4 thematic categories were developed as follows: reception and management of euthanasia requests and regulations in Colombia; emotional accompaniment and effective communication with the patient and family; participation in euthanasia preparations and administration of medications; and management of requests and administration of medications.
Conclusion
Nursing plays an important role in the care of the patient requesting euthanasia, from the reception and management of the request to the administration of the lethal drugs.
Q3

Perceived Health Risks Associated with Smartphone Use Among Health College Students at Qassim University in Saudi Arabia
Qalawa S.A., Ibrahim N.M., Fadlalmola H.A., Elmansy F.M., Elbqry M.G.
Background
Smartphones have evolved into a fusion of traditional personal digital assistants and cellular phones, integrating mobile communication capabilities with features parallel to those of a handheld computer.
Objective
This study aimed to assess the health risks associated with smartphone use and the prevalence and nature of observed health issues among health college students at Qassim University in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
Employing a descriptive cross-sectional research design, this study surveyed a convenience sample of 511 health college students at Qassim University. The data collection instrument comprised two sections: Section 1 assessed sociodemographic, academic, and health-related information, while Section 2 evaluated the health risks as perceived by students.
Results
The majority of the participants were women (71%) and were studying nursing (26%). A significant proportion (39.9%) reported blurred vision, while 38.6% indicated a lack of adequate sleep. Notably, no significant association was observed between the health complaints and sociodemographic information. The analysis also revealed no significant relationship between health complaints and smartphone usage patterns.
Conclusion
The findings highlight a critical need for further research to investigate the factors contributing to the effect of smartphone use on the physiological well-being of university students. Such research is essential for developing targeted interventions to mitigate the associated health risks.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
1098 citations, 6.07%
|
|
BMC Medical Ethics
365 citations, 2.02%
|
|
Journal of Medical Ethics
319 citations, 1.76%
|
|
Nursing Ethics
266 citations, 1.47%
|
|
Health Care Analysis
150 citations, 0.83%
|
|
American Journal of Bioethics
140 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
136 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
122 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Clinical Ethics
118 citations, 0.65%
|
|
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
118 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
116 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
113 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
108 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
108 citations, 0.6%
|
|
PLoS ONE
107 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Ethik in der Medizin
100 citations, 0.55%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
90 citations, 0.5%
|
|
HEC Forum
84 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Sociology of Health and Illness
79 citations, 0.44%
|
|
BMJ Open
78 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
75 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Qualitative Health Research
75 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Science and Engineering Ethics
74 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Patient Education and Counseling
73 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Disability and Rehabilitation
69 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
68 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Nursing Philosophy
67 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Medical Humanities
65 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Nursing
65 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Advanced Nursing
63 citations, 0.35%
|
|
BMC Palliative Care
61 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
59 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Revista Bioética
57 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Philosophy and Medicine
56 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
55 citations, 0.3%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
53 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Health (United Kingdom)
52 citations, 0.29%
|
|
BMC Medical Education
47 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Palliative Medicine
46 citations, 0.25%
|
|
New Genetics and Society
46 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
45 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
45 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
44 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Monash bioethics review
43 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Neuroethics
43 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nursing Inquiry
42 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Healthcare
38 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Philosophical Psychology
38 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Health Expectations
38 citations, 0.21%
|
|
European Journal of Human Genetics
38 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
36 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Genetic Counseling
35 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Religion and Health
35 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Public Health Ethics
35 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
34 citations, 0.19%
|
|
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
34 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
32 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
32 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Acceptable Risk in Biomedical Research
32 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics
31 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Transplantation
31 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Accountability in Research
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Dementia
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Ethics
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Ethics and Information Technology
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Palliative Medicine
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Palliative and Supportive Care
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
New Bioethics
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
AJOB Neuroscience
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
BMC Geriatrics
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Omega: Journal of Death and Dying
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
AI and Society
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Social Epistemology
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Asian Bioethics Review
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Aging Studies
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Synthese
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Health Policy
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Community Genetics
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Nursing Studies
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Midwifery
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Human Studies
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Medical Education
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Ageing and Society
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The International Library of Bioethics
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Academic Medicine
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Medical Anthropology: Cross Cultural Studies in Health and Illness
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
NanoEthics
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Human Reproduction
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Frontiers in Sociology
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
20 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Religions
20 citations, 0.11%
|
|
BioSocieties
20 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Cureus
20 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Gesundheit und Nachhaltigkeit
20 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
|
Springer Nature
4851 citations, 26.8%
|
|
Elsevier
1816 citations, 10.03%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1686 citations, 9.32%
|
|
Wiley
1443 citations, 7.97%
|
|
SAGE
1371 citations, 7.58%
|
|
BMJ
566 citations, 3.13%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
532 citations, 2.94%
|
|
Oxford University Press
447 citations, 2.47%
|
|
MDPI
407 citations, 2.25%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
370 citations, 2.04%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
315 citations, 1.74%
|
|
Emerald
139 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
129 citations, 0.71%
|
|
JMIR Publications
115 citations, 0.64%
|
|
SciELO
108 citations, 0.6%
|
|
IGI Global
104 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
92 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
72 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
53 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
51 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
47 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
45 citations, 0.25%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
45 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
43 citations, 0.24%
|
|
S. Karger AG
43 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
41 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
37 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
36 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
University Pub. Group
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
CAIRN
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IOS Press
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
F1000 Research
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Royal College of Psychiatrists
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IntechOpen
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Duke University Press
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
University of Montreal
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
AOSIS
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Bristol University Press
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Medknow
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Public Health Association
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
EDP Sciences
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
OpenEdition
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Royal College of General Practitioners
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Annual Reviews
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Human Kinetics
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
RCNi
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
SLACK
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Brill
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Berghahn Books
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hans Publishers
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
British Veterinary Association
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co, KG
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
XMLink
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AIP Publishing
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Editions E D K
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American College of Physicians
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOP Publishing
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association Centre Sevres
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Intellect
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AACN Publishing
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Philosophy Documentation Center, Saint Louis University
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Nephrology
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Instytut Filozofii UJ
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Silicea - Poligraf, LLC
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
University of Oslo
65 publications, 3.76%
|
|
University of Zurich
61 publications, 3.52%
|
|
Linköping University
50 publications, 2.89%
|
|
Duquesne University
44 publications, 2.54%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
34 publications, 1.96%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
34 publications, 1.96%
|
|
Dublin City University
33 publications, 1.91%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
30 publications, 1.73%
|
|
University of Manchester
29 publications, 1.68%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
28 publications, 1.62%
|
|
University of Basel
24 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Maastricht University
24 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Cardiff University
24 publications, 1.39%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
22 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Ghent University
19 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Uppsala University
19 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
18 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Humanistic Studies
18 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
17 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Tübingen
16 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
16 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Oxford
16 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Södertörn University
15 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Bergen
15 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
15 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Sydney
14 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Paris Cité University
12 publications, 0.69%
|
|
McGill University
12 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
12 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Creighton University
12 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Lund University
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Aarhus University
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Debrecen
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Umeå University
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Bristol
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Swansea University
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Göttingen
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University Medical Center Göttingen
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Groningen
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Vienna
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Twente
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Geneva
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Turku
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Monash University
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Heidelberg University
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Cambridge
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
King's College London
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Birmingham
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Chicago
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Lancaster University
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Münster
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Sheffield
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Warsaw
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Padua
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
North-West University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Iceland
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Arizona State University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Harvard University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Toronto
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Stockholm University
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Helsinki
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Durham University
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
National University of Singapore
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Georgetown University
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Dalhousie University
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Hannover Medical School
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Utrecht University
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Karlstad University
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Malmö University
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Linnaeus University
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Milan
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University College London
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Aalborg University
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Warwick
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Glasgow
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Stanford University
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Newcastle University
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Cologne
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Michigan
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of British Columbia
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Minnesota
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
Duquesne University
18 publications, 5.68%
|
|
Dublin City University
17 publications, 5.36%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
11 publications, 3.47%
|
|
University of Oslo
11 publications, 3.47%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
8 publications, 2.52%
|
|
University of Manchester
8 publications, 2.52%
|
|
University of Basel
7 publications, 2.21%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
7 publications, 2.21%
|
|
University of Tübingen
6 publications, 1.89%
|
|
Ghent University
6 publications, 1.89%
|
|
Linköping University
6 publications, 1.89%
|
|
University of Oxford
6 publications, 1.89%
|
|
University of Sydney
5 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
5 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Twente
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
Heidelberg University
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Zurich
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Geneva
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Cambridge
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
Stanford University
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Potsdam
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Vienna
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Humanistic Studies
4 publications, 1.26%
|
|
Södertörn University
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Warwick
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Maastricht University
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Birmingham
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Monash University
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Columbia University
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
North-West University
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
McGill University
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Groningen
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Warsaw
3 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Ajman University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Uppsala University
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Bergen
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
North Carolina State University
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Hannover Medical School
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Greifswald
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Bremen
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
2 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Boğaziçi University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
TOBB University of Economics and Technology
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Basque Foundation for Science
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Genoa
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Lorraine
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Ariel University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Assuta Medical Center
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Yehuda Abarbanel Mental Health Center
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Tampere University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Central South University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Stockholm University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Umeå University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Karlstad University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Lausanne
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Nankai University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Western Sydney University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Xiamen University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Turku
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
USA
|
USA, 245, 14.15%
USA
245 publications, 14.15%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 216, 12.48%
Netherlands
216 publications, 12.48%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 206, 11.9%
United Kingdom
206 publications, 11.9%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 153, 8.84%
Germany
153 publications, 8.84%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 141, 8.15%
Sweden
141 publications, 8.15%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 103, 5.95%
Switzerland
103 publications, 5.95%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 102, 5.89%
Norway
102 publications, 5.89%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 57, 3.29%
Belgium
57 publications, 3.29%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 51, 2.95%
Canada
51 publications, 2.95%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 48, 2.77%
Ireland
48 publications, 2.77%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 47, 2.72%
Denmark
47 publications, 2.72%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 46, 2.66%
Australia
46 publications, 2.66%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 39, 2.25%
Italy
39 publications, 2.25%
|
France
|
France, 38, 2.2%
France
38 publications, 2.2%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 26, 1.5%
Poland
26 publications, 1.5%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 24, 1.39%
Israel
24 publications, 1.39%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 20, 1.16%
Spain
20 publications, 1.16%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 19, 1.1%
Austria
19 publications, 1.1%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 19, 1.1%
Finland
19 publications, 1.1%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 16, 0.92%
Hungary
16 publications, 0.92%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 14, 0.81%
Portugal
14 publications, 0.81%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 13, 0.75%
Mexico
13 publications, 0.75%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 13, 0.75%
South Africa
13 publications, 0.75%
|
China
|
China, 12, 0.69%
China
12 publications, 0.69%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 11, 0.64%
Croatia
11 publications, 0.64%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 8, 0.46%
Iceland
8 publications, 0.46%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 7, 0.4%
Iran
7 publications, 0.4%
|
India
|
India, 6, 0.35%
India
6 publications, 0.35%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 6, 0.35%
Lithuania
6 publications, 0.35%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 6, 0.35%
Turkey
6 publications, 0.35%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 5, 0.29%
Malta
5 publications, 0.29%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 5, 0.29%
New Zealand
5 publications, 0.29%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 5, 0.29%
Singapore
5 publications, 0.29%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 4, 0.23%
Argentina
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 4, 0.23%
Brazil
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.23%
Greece
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 4, 0.23%
Chile
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 3, 0.17%
Latvia
3 publications, 0.17%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.17%
Romania
3 publications, 0.17%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.17%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.17%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 0.17%
Japan
3 publications, 0.17%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.12%
UAE
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 2, 0.12%
Slovakia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.12%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.06%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.06%
Albania
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Aruba
|
Aruba, 1, 0.06%
Aruba
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.06%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.06%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.06%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.06%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.06%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.06%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.06%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.06%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.06%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.06%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.06%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.06%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.06%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (30 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
|
|
USA
|
USA, 50, 15.77%
USA
50 publications, 15.77%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 39, 12.3%
United Kingdom
39 publications, 12.3%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 35, 11.04%
Netherlands
35 publications, 11.04%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 29, 9.15%
Germany
29 publications, 9.15%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 22, 6.94%
Norway
22 publications, 6.94%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 18, 5.68%
Ireland
18 publications, 5.68%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 15, 4.73%
Australia
15 publications, 4.73%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 14, 4.42%
Switzerland
14 publications, 4.42%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 13, 4.1%
Denmark
13 publications, 4.1%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 13, 4.1%
Sweden
13 publications, 4.1%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 12, 3.79%
Belgium
12 publications, 3.79%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 12, 3.79%
Canada
12 publications, 3.79%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 12, 3.79%
Mexico
12 publications, 3.79%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 11, 3.47%
Italy
11 publications, 3.47%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 10, 3.15%
Poland
10 publications, 3.15%
|
China
|
China, 8, 2.52%
China
8 publications, 2.52%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 8, 2.52%
South Africa
8 publications, 2.52%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 6, 1.89%
Austria
6 publications, 1.89%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 1.89%
Spain
6 publications, 1.89%
|
France
|
France, 4, 1.26%
France
4 publications, 1.26%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 4, 1.26%
Israel
4 publications, 1.26%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 4, 1.26%
Finland
4 publications, 1.26%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 3, 0.95%
Singapore
3 publications, 0.95%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.95%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.95%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.63%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.63%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.63%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.63%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.63%
UAE
2 publications, 0.63%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.63%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.63%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.63%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.63%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.32%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.32%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.32%
Greece
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.32%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.32%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.32%
India
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.32%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.32%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.32%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.32%
Romania
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.32%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.32%
Japan
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Show all (10 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
|
2 profile journal articles
Bracanović Tomislav
11 publications,
35 citations
h-index: 4
1 profile journal article
Jiang Li
17 publications,
41 citations
h-index: 5
1 profile journal article
Brorson Stig

Zealand University Hospital Køge

University of Copenhagen
121 publications,
5 004 citations
h-index: 28
1 profile journal article
Francisco Lara
19 publications,
161 citations
h-index: 6
1 profile journal article
Sacchini Dario
64 publications,
768 citations
h-index: 15