ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Years of issue
2024-2025
journal names
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
Top-3 citing journals

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
(2842 citations)

ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
(963 citations)

Information and Software Technology
(731 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Carnegie Mellon University
(79 publications)

University of California, Irvine
(62 publications)

University of Delhi
(48 publications)

Northern Arizona University
(23 publications)

University of Pisa
(18 publications)

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
(9 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 356
Q3

How employees perceive work–family balanced HR practices: a moderated mediation analysis with psychological capital and differentiated leader–member exchange
Zhao F., Lu Y.(., Zhang P., Wang J.
PurposeWork–family balance has become one of the primary job considerations in recent years. For enterprises, the psychological behavior of employees has also received greater attention. This research aims to reveal how work–family balanced human resource practices (WFB-HRP) influence employees’ performance through psychological capital and how such influence was moderated by differentiated leader–member exchange (DLMX).Design/methodology/approachData were collected through a structured survey of 2,197 employees. The relationships among WFB-HRP, psychological capital, DLMX and employee performance were analyzed to understand the direct and indirect effects.FindingsThe findings reveal a positive association between WFB-HRP and employee performance, mediated by psychological capital. Moreover, DLMX moderates both the direct influence of WFB-HRP on employee performance and its indirect effect through psychological capital. Specifically, greater DLMX strengthens the impact of WFB-HRP on employee performance via psychological capital.Research limitations/implicationsThe research seeks to contribute to understanding how organizational practices influence employee performance in the context of work–family balance, with particular attention to the interplay of psychological factors and leadership dynamics.Practical implicationsThis research underscores the importance of implementing work-family balanced HR practices for enhancing employee performance. Moreover, it highlights the significance of fostering positive psychological capital among employees and cultivating differentiated leader–member exchange to maximize the effectiveness of WFB-HRP initiatives.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by elucidating the mechanisms through which WFB-HRP influences employee performance, emphasizing the pivotal roles of psychological capital and DLMX. The findings offer practical insights for organizations seeking to optimize their HR practices and leadership strategies to unlock high performance in the workplace.
Q3

Stay positive, keep them committed: extending the link between positive leadership and affective commitment
Kelm S., Borchert M.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of positive leadership (PL), a theory originating from positive psychology, on affective commitment (AC), an important outcome in times of skilled labor shortages. This study also examines psychological need satisfaction (PNS) and well-being as serial mediators between PL and AC.Design/methodology/approachA 2-wave-study with 282 employees of a German company in the finance and insurance sector was conducted. The data were analyzed using covariance analytic structural equation modeling with RStudio.FindingsThe results suggest that PL improves AC. Additionally, PNS and well-being mediate this relationship individually and serially.Originality/valueOur study is one of the few to examine PL as a leadership style in its own right and not a synonym for various leadership styles (e.g. transformational leadership) and one of the first to emphasize its importance for employee retention. Moreover, we make a unique contribution by combining work design theory and self-determination theory to examine the underlying mechanisms of the influence of PL on AC. Therefore, this research is the first to investigate a serial mediation between PL, PNS, well-being and AC.
Q3

The impact of boundary crossing on well-being among remote workers and the moderating role of nonwork role re-engagement (NWRR)
Song X., Gong B.
PurposeAs businesses are going on around the clock and the prevalence of remote work arrangements is on the rise, the boundary between work and nonwork contexts is blurring. As a result, workers often find themselves interrupted by their supervisors or colleagues during nonwork hours. However, there is still much to reveal about the impact of boundary-crossing activities on work–life balance as well as how a remote worker’s boundary management capacity may influence this impact. This paper aims to answer these unaddressed questions.Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal survey was administered using a quantitative method, with 336 US workers providing valid responses. The data were analyzed using regression-based path analysis.FindingsThe findings provide evidence that boundary-crossing activities impact remote workers’ work–life balance, and individual differences in boundary management ability, such as nonwork role re-engagement (NWRR), help employees take advantage of remote work flexibility and enhance work–life balance.Research limitations/implicationsDrawn from boundary management theory, this study reveals a process effect, through which remote work experience influences work-related interruption during nonwork hours, which impacts work–life balance and well-being. Meanwhile, this study demonstrates that individual differences in NWRR help employees take advantage of remote work flexibility and enhance work–life balance.Originality/valueThis research offers valuable insights into the intricate relationships between remote work experiences, boundary-crossing activities, work–life balance and employee well-being. By investigating the mechanisms and individual differences involved, this study contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical strategies for navigating the challenges of the evolving work landscape with remote work blended.
Q3

Does responsible leadership via voice behavior promote green behavior?
Uzum B., Ozkan O.S., Ozkurt Sivrikaya S., Ciftyildiz K.
PurposeThis study, which utilizes the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory, aims to explicate the relationship between responsible leadership (RL), green behavior (GB) and the mediating role of voice behavior (VB).Design/methodology/approachThis study used a quantitative research design. The research sample consists of 260 participants who work in five-star hotels in Izmir. The research data were collected through face-to-face and online survey methods. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in AMOS was performed to assess the measurement model. The research hypotheses were tested with structural equation modeling (SEM).FindingsThe results determined that RL affects GB and VB positively and significantly. In addition, VB has a significant positive link with GB. Furthermore, this study discovered that VB acts as a mediator in the relationship between RL and GB, indicating that RL indirectly promotes GB through implementing VB.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has limitations, such as its dependence on self-reported data, cross-sectional design and exclusive emphasis on participants from a single nation. When RL encourages employees to take GB, they are more likely to engage in GB. This study contributes to the field by evaluating the structures discussed with the JD-R theory. In the management practice of organizations, RL should be strengthened, and training should be provided to enhance RL.Originality/valueThe literature analysis revealed that, while studies have been undertaken using RL, the idea has not been tested using VB or has it been investigated in the hotel business, which has grown vital to the global economy. With these aspects, the work stands apart and serves as a source of motivation for researchers.
Q3

The shadowy realm of proactivity: how rumination fuels work–life conflict
Goswami M., Dash S.
PurposeThe current study explores the linking mechanisms and conditional processes underlying the relationship between proactive work behavior (PWB) and work-life conflict (WLC), and the mediating role of rumination. Based on the conservation of resources theory, we hypothesized that PWB is a resource-consuming activity that increases emotional and cognitive strain by making one ruminate (demarcated as reflection/reflective pondering and brooding), which in turn, results in work-to-life conflict.Design/methodology/approachMulti-phased data was obtained from 244 working Indian adults who were working full-time in organization across India. Data was analyzed using structural equation modelling, using SPSS (v.26) and AMOS (v.23).FindingsOverall, empirical data supported our model. Our finding indicates that PWB impact WLC, mediated through rumination (reflection and brooding) differentially. Brooding mediated between PWB and WLC (p < 0.001). Reflective pondering had a negative influence on WLC, and also had a negative indirect impact between PWB and WLC (p = 0.022).Originality/valueOur study adds on to the research on the negative outcome of proactive work behavior (i.e., causing work-to-life conflict). Additionally, our study also explores the indirect pathway of proactive work behavior that impacts work-life conflict, through rumination. We further demarcated between the two types of rumination, viz., reflective pondering and brooding, and established that they have different influences on this relationship between PWB and WLC.
Q3

Breaking barriers: driving HR analytics adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises
Ilyas M., Alam W., Ahmad A.
PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the primary factors driving human resource analytics adoption in small and medium-sized organizations. The research seeks to confirm and expand the UTAUT model using direct predictors and a unique moderator to understand contextual complexities in a developing country.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed convenience sampling to survey 308 HR experts with an 88% response rate, uncovering valuable insights into technology integration. SPSS and AMOS 21.0 were used for analysis.FindingsThe influencing elements for adopting human resource analytics in these firms were performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions and social influence. Moreover, personal innovativeness, fear appeal and perceived trust were highlighted as additional significant determinants. Finally, perceived supervisor support was reported as a significant moderator in driving human resource analytics adoption.Originality/valueThe study comprehensively models the elements that influence the adoption of human resource analytics in SMEs of a developing economy. The research validates and expands upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, analyzing key contributors and a unique context-specific moderator using robust statistical methods.
Q3

Organizational climate for initiative and innovative work behavior: a moderated mediation model
Hassi A., Rohlfer S., Jebsen S.
PurposeThis paper aimed at investigating the relationship between organizational climate for initiative, job autonomy, climate for innovation and innovative work behavior (IWB) in a developing economy context.Design/methodology/approachThe study surveyed 444 manufacturing businesses in Morocco, collecting data from three sources: CEOs, middle managers and non-managerial employees in the production department. The data were analyzed using structural equation modelling, the Bayesian estimation approach and the bootstrapped moderated mediation technique.FindingsThis study revealed that middle managers’ job autonomy mediates the positive link between climate for initiative and middle managers’ IWB when climate for innovation is strong.Practical implicationsThis study provides practical information for organizations intending to make their middle managers willing to be innovative in their job by granting them job autonomy and building favorable climates for initiative and innovation.Originality/valueThis research expands the human resource management and innovation literature by examining features of the work context (i.e. climates for initiative and for innovation, and job autonomy) as previous research has mainly focused on the context approach to work design (i.e. social environment of work design). The study highlights the role of middle managers as essential contributors to fostering innovations within their firms.
Q3

Measuring the impact of leadership attributes on employee engagement through psychological empowerment: a study from the pharmaceutical industry
Rasheed R., Rashid A., Tunio M.N., Amirah N.A.
PurposeManagers are continuously worried about the engagement of employees in the organization. This research aimed to investigate the employees’ perceptions regarding leadership attributes, which enhance the workers’ psychological empowerment and engagement.Design/methodology/approachA sample of 296 employees from three pharmaceutical companies based in Karachi was selected. For hypothesis testing, IBM SPSS AMOS version 24 was used to perform a confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling.FindingsThe outcomes of multiple regression analysis expressed that the attributes of a leader positively influence psychological empowerment and employee engagement. The study found that psychological empowerment partially mediates the relationship between leadership attributes (feedback and delegation) and employee retention. Furthermore, psychological empowerment has no mediation between leadership attributes (empathy) and employee retention.Originality/valueThis study offers a unique contribution by focusing on the relationship between leadership attributes (empathy, delegation and feedback) and employee engagement within the pharmaceutical industry in Karachi, a relatively underexplored context. Psychological empowerment as a partial mediator between leadership attributes and employee retention adds a novel perspective, particularly by revealing that it mediates the impact of delegation and feedback but not empathy. Moreover, this research provides actionable insights for policymakers and operational managers in industries beyond pharmaceuticals, making it valuable for enhancing employee engagement across sectors. Advanced statistical techniques like structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis further reinforce the study’s methodological rigour.
Q3

The role of resilience and gender in satisfaction with life and self-efficacy: a moderated mediation framework
Saha S., Saini G.K.
PurposeTo study the mediating effect of resilience and the moderating effect of gender on the association between satisfaction with life and self-efficacy.Design/methodology/approachParticipants were 211 HR professionals; mediation and moderation hypotheses were tested using PROCESS macro.FindingsResults revealed a significant association between satisfaction with life, self-efficacy and dimensions of resilience. The mediating effect was significant for three dimensions of resilience: positive acceptance, personal competence and trust in one’s instincts. Gender moderated the relationship between satisfaction with life and self-efficacy through positive acceptance and positive competence but not trust in one’s instincts.Originality/valueMost literature examines satisfaction with life as an outcome measure despite existing calls and alternate theoretical frameworks. This study considers satisfaction with life as a predictor of self-efficacy and resilience. Linkages with theoretical frameworks and implications are discussed.
Q3

The digital escape: examining the impact of cyberloafing on gossip-induced emotional exhaustion and the mediating role of self-esteem
Kaur A., Maheshwari S., Varma A.
PurposeThis research sheds light on how workplace gossip may affect employees' emotional well-being via self-esteem. Further, the study examines the moderating role of cyberloafing in the examined relationship.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs a moderated mediation model to examine the linkage among workplace gossip, self-esteem, and emotional exhaustion, incorporating cyberloafing as a moderator. Data were gathered from 249 employees working in various industries from the US.FindingsWorkplace gossip substantially diminishes self-esteem, which is inversely related to emotional exhaustion. Notably, cyberloafing positively moderates the relationship between self-esteem and emotional exhaustion, heightening the adverse effects of gossip.Practical implicationsThe findings have critical implications for human resource management strategies. To mitigate the impact of gossip, HR managers should foster positive work environments, promote emotional well-being, and implement policies to curb cyberloafing.Originality/valueThis study expands the discussion on workplace gossip while probing the role of self-esteem and cyberloafing. It contributes to the application of the conservation of resource theory to analyze emotional well-being in organizational settings.
Q3

Toxic workplaces, tarnished outcomes: understanding the effects of bullying on job outcomes
Iqbal J., Parray Z.A., Bharadwaj S.
PurposeThis study examines the impact of workplace bullying on workers’ innovative behavior, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and affective commitment while taking burnout into account as a potential mediator.Design/methodology/approachWe hypothesize that workplace bullying will have a detrimental effect on employees’ capacity for innovative behavior and OCB, as well as impair their affective commitment to the company, based on the Conservation of Resource theory. We used cluster sampling to gather data from 249 bank employees, using structural equation modeling to evaluate our assumptions.FindingsAccording to our research, there is a strong negative correlation between workplace bullying and innovative behavior, OCB and a reduction in affective commitment. Additionally, burnout was found to be a key mediator between these outcomes and workplace bullying, indicating a critical role for burnout in spreading the negative impacts of bullying on employees’ attitudes and behaviors.Originality/valueThe results of this study show how bullying at work harms employees’ innovative behavior, OCB and affective commitment, which might eventually lower organizational productivity and performance. It is important to develop a culture of creativity, increase employee engagement and strengthen organizational commitment by building a friendly and courteous work environment. Collectively addressing burnout and workplace bullying will increase employee well-being, job happiness and overall organizational success.
Q3

Linking paternalistic leadership and service behaviours through perceived support from supervisor and organisation: empirical evidence from the Pakistani healthcare sector
Hussain M., Luu T.T., Marjoribanks T.
PurposeDrawing upon social exchange theory, this study aims to assess whether paternalistic leadership style (authoritarianism, benevolence and morality) influences employee in-role service behaviour and extra-role service behaviour, particularly patient-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour via a dual mediation mechanism, i.e. perceived supervisor support and perceived organisational support.Design/methodology/approachThe data were gathered from doctors and nurses working in Pakistan’s public, private and semi-government hospitals. We used SPSS and AMOS 27 to run structural equation modelling.FindingsResults revealed that authoritarianism was negatively associated with in-role service behaviour and patient-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour through perceived supervisor support and perceived organisational support. In contrast, benevolent and moral behaviours of leaders were positively associated with in-role service behaviour via perceived supervisor support and perceived organisational support. However, perceived supervisor support did not mediate the relations between paternalistic leadership dimensions and patient-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour.Originality/valueOur research advances the paternalistic leadership literature concerning paternalistic leadership and employees’ service behaviours through dual mediation mechanisms and in a relatively understudied sector and national context.
Q3

Unleashing service recovery excellence: exploring the power of dimensional autonomy and thriving at work as catalysts during COVID-19
Farid H., Zhang Y., Tian M., Lu S.
PurposeThis study explores how three-dimensional job autonomy (decision-making, work method and work scheduling) affects employees’ thriving at work and service recovery performance in the hospitality industry during COVID-19.Design/methodology/approachThis study utilized cross-sectional dyadic data from 287 frontline workers in the Chinese hospitality sector and analyzed it with Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) and the PROCESS macro.FindingsThe findings indicate that three-dimensional autonomy has a direct impact on thriving and an indirect effect on service recovery performance (SRP) through thriving, and the relationship between three-dimensional autonomy and thriving is moderated by SOCV19R.Originality/valueThis study addresses the existing gap in research regarding the various aspects of autonomy. It explores how distinct dimensions of autonomy affect employees’ thriving at work and, in turn, influence their ability to excel in service recovery. Furthermore, it sheds light on how the unique circumstances of COVID-19, as represented by SOCV19R, play a role in understanding the dynamics between different forms of autonomy and employees’ thriving.
Q3

Interplay between innovation-oriented HRM and leadership to promote intrapreneurial behavior for innovation performance in small- and medium-sized enterprises
Rasheed M.A., Elahi N.S., Nisar Q.A., Nasir N.
PurposeDrawing on ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) framework, this study investigates the direct effect of innovation-oriented HRM on SMEs’ innovation performance, both directly and through intrapreneurial behavior. Besides, the study assesses the moderating role of innovation-oriented leadership in the relationship between innovation-oriented HRM and intrapreneurial behavior.Design/methodology/approachA two-wave dataset collected from 183 SMEs was used to test the proposed hypotheses by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).FindingsFindings suggest that innovation-oriented HRM positively impacts SMEs’ innovation performance directly and through intrapreneurial behavior. Evidence also confirms that innovation-oriented leadership positively moderates the effect of innovation-oriented HRM on intrapreneurial behavior.Research limitations/implicationsThrough the AMO framework, this study advances our understanding of how the interaction between innovation-oriented HRM and leadership fosters intrapreneurial behavior, ultimately contributing to superior innovation performance in SMEs.Practical implicationsThe study recommends that SMEs implement innovation-oriented HRM practices to encourage intrapreneurial behavior and achieve superior innovation performance in SMEs.Originality/valueLimited research has addressed the contributions of innovation-oriented HRM and leadership toward realizing strategic innovation objectives. Our study offers valuable insights into the functions of innovation-oriented HRM and leadership in stimulating intrapreneurial behavior, thereby enhancing the innovation performance of SMEs.
Q3

Unravelling the impact: supervisor incivility on employee health and the role of affective rumination
Kyei-Poku I., Orozco Quijano E.P.
PurposeThis study investigates the influence of supervisor incivility on two important employee health-related outcomes–somatic complaints and emotional exhaustion. Similarly, the study examines the role of affective rumination as a mediator between the supervisor incivility–somatic complaints and emotional exhaustion relationship.Design/methodology/approachWe collected data in three phases, separated by an interval of four weeks. The final sample comprised 154 employees from diverse occupations and professions. Partial least squares–structural equation modelling was used to examine the research model.FindingsEmployees’ perceptions of supervisor incivility increased somatic complaints and emotional exhaustion experiences. Moreover, drawing on the conservation of resources and the effort-recovery theories, we found support for the mediating role of affective rumination for somatic complaints but not for emotional exhaustion.Practical implicationsTo help protect organizations from financial and productivity losses related to supervisor incivility, we encouraged organizations to be aware of supervisors’ uncivil behaviours and provide training on how to deal with such behaviours. We further advise organizations to coach supervisors on uncivil prevention and the importance of modelling proper behaviours.Originality/valueThis study expands the limited knowledge of supervisor incivility and health outcomes. Specifically, using a time-lagged design, the findings show that affective rumination is an essential mechanism for understanding the impact of supervisor incivility on health outcomes. Moreover, understanding how supervisor incivility impacts employee health outcomes is vital for advancing theory and designing interventions to mitigate adverse effects.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
2842 citations, 10.47%
|
|
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
963 citations, 3.55%
|
|
Information and Software Technology
731 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Journal of Systems and Software
693 citations, 2.55%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
557 citations, 2.05%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
332 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Empirical Software Engineering
271 citations, 1%
|
|
IEEE Access
248 citations, 0.91%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
233 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
214 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
198 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Software - Practice and Experience
184 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Software Testing Verification and Reliability
171 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Science of Computer Programming
166 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Software Quality Journal
155 citations, 0.57%
|
|
ACM SIGPLAN Notices
138 citations, 0.51%
|
|
IET Software
135 citations, 0.5%
|
|
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering
122 citations, 0.45%
|
|
ACM Computing Surveys
121 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Software and Systems Modeling
120 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Advances in Computers
116 citations, 0.43%
|
|
IEEE Software
103 citations, 0.38%
|
|
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
96 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science
96 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Formal Aspects of Computing
93 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Software Evolution and Process
90 citations, 0.33%
|
|
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
78 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Communications of the ACM
76 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Requirements Engineering
76 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Automated Software Engineering
72 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management
67 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
67 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
66 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
62 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
60 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering
58 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal not defined
53 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering
52 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
52 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, EPTCS
50 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design
50 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
50 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Reliability
49 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Computer
46 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IFAC Proceedings Volumes
44 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
39 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Informatik zwischen Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft
39 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
38 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Computer Standards and Interfaces
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Studies in Computational Intelligence
35 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applied Soft Computing Journal
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
33 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Information Systems
33 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience
32 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Soft Computing
32 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Computers and Security
30 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Information Sciences
28 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IEEE Annals of the History of Computing
28 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
28 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Sensors
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Informatik aktuell
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Data and Knowledge Engineering
25 citations, 0.09%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
24 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Systems Engineering
24 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Theoretical Computer Science
24 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Science China Information Sciences
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
ACM SIGAda Ada Letters
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Sustainability
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
PLoS ONE
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Advances in Computer and Electrical Engineering
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
SAE Technical Papers
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
20 citations, 0.07%
|
|
International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes
20 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics
20 citations, 0.07%
|
|
PeerJ Computer Science
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Data Base for Advances in Information Systems
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Journal of Supercomputing
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Frontiers of Computer Science
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Knowledge-Based Systems
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Information Systems Journal
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Future Generation Computer Systems
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Information (Switzerland)
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Programming and Computer Software
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Computers
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Cluster Computing
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Journal of Information Technology
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SpringerBriefs in Computer Science
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Information Technology and Management
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
|
Springer Nature
6115 citations, 22.54%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
4845 citations, 17.86%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
3305 citations, 12.18%
|
|
Elsevier
2956 citations, 10.89%
|
|
Wiley
806 citations, 2.97%
|
|
IGI Global
385 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
271 citations, 1%
|
|
MDPI
264 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
166 citations, 0.61%
|
|
World Scientific
156 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Emerald
105 citations, 0.39%
|
|
SAGE
84 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
72 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
55 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IOP Publishing
52 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
52 citations, 0.19%
|
|
electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science, eptcs
51 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IOS Press
43 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
39 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Science Alert
38 citations, 0.14%
|
|
29 citations, 0.11%
|
|
SAE International
29 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Science in China Press
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
24 citations, 0.09%
|
|
JMIR Publications
24 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Oxford University Press
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
PeerJ
20 citations, 0.07%
|
|
King Saud University
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
AIP Publishing
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
EDP Sciences
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
International Academy Publishing (IAP)
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Wuhan University
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Tech Science Press
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Sciences
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
proceedings - international conference on software engineering
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Indian Society for Education and Environment
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ASME International
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IACSIT Press
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Information Processing Society of Japan
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korea Information Processing Society (KIPS)
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ain Shams University
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
CAIRN
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Royal Society
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IWA Publishing
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Zhejiang University Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
proceedings of the vldb endowment
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Journal of Information and Education Technology
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Szeged, Institute of Informatics
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Science Publications
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korea Soc of Automotive Engineers, Inc
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
ComSIS Consortium
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Computer Science
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences (IJMEMS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
OpenEdition
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
AOSIS
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hans Publishers
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
ASTES Journal
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0%
|
|
University of California Press
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Brill
1 citation, 0%
|
|
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
1 citation, 0%
|
|
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
79 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
62 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Delhi
48 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
42 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Imperial College London
39 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
38 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
37 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Southern California
34 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
34 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Northern Arizona University
33 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
32 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Ames Research Center
32 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Oregon State University
30 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
29 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Pisa
29 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Stevens Institute of Technology
28 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Amity University, Noida
26 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Stanford University
26 publications, 0.54%
|
|
George Mason University
26 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering
24 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Waterloo
23 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
22 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Ohio State University
22 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of British Columbia
22 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Nanjing University
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Newcastle University
20 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Portland State University
20 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad
19 publications, 0.39%
|
|
North Carolina State University
19 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Lancaster University
19 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Victoria
19 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Atilim University
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University College London
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Washington
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Guru Nanak Dev University
17 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Blekinge Institute of Technology
17 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
17 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Jadavpur University
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Charles University
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Paderborn University
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of York
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Mälardalen University
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Peking University
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Clemson University
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Keele University
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Purdue University
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Brown University
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Groningen
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Maribor
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Auckland
13 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Kaiserslautern-Landau
13 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
ETH Zurich
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Iowa State University
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Texas at Dallas
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Dublin City University
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Minnesota
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Western University
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Brigham Young University
12 publications, 0.25%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Lucknow
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Stony Brook University
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Cornell University
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Federal University of Pernambuco
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Johannes Kepler University of Linz
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Toronto
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Calgary
11 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Maharshi Dayanand University
10 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
10 publications, 0.21%
|
|
National University of Singapore
10 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Michigan State University
10 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Colorado State University
10 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Vienna University of Technology
10 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Namur
10 publications, 0.21%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
10 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Delhi Technological University
9 publications, 0.19%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Rourkela
9 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar
9 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
9 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Linnaeus University
9 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Cambridge
9 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
Northern Arizona University
23 publications, 8.61%
|
|
University of Pisa
18 publications, 6.74%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
9 publications, 3.37%
|
|
University College London
6 publications, 2.25%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
6 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
5 publications, 1.87%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
5 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Charles University
5 publications, 1.87%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
5 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
5 publications, 1.87%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
5 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Auckland
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Monash University
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Sheffield
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Tartu
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Blekinge Institute of Technology
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Oulu
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Imperial College London
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Institute for Energy Technology
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Deakin University
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Groningen
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Porto
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
York University
3 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Bilkent University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Peking University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Wuhan University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Aalto University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Mälardalen University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
IT University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Southern California
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of L'Aquila
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Sannio
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Adelaide
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Dalhousie University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Makerere University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
North Carolina State University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
San Francisco State University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Dublin City University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Namur
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Grand Valley State University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Lancaster University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Paderborn University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Passau
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Boise State University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Polytechnique Montréal
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Portland State University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of York
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Saudi Electronic University
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
University of Kashmir
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Jerusalem College of Technology
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
University of Genoa
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Tampere University
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Malmö University
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Linnaeus University
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
University of Antwerp
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Drexel University
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
University of Southampton
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Samsung
1 publication, 0.37%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1890, 39%
USA
1890 publications, 39%
|
India
|
India, 410, 8.46%
India
410 publications, 8.46%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 271, 5.59%
United Kingdom
271 publications, 5.59%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 269, 5.55%
Germany
269 publications, 5.55%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 227, 4.68%
Canada
227 publications, 4.68%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 172, 3.55%
Italy
172 publications, 3.55%
|
China
|
China, 120, 2.48%
China
120 publications, 2.48%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 95, 1.96%
Sweden
95 publications, 1.96%
|
France
|
France, 87, 1.8%
France
87 publications, 1.8%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 82, 1.69%
Brazil
82 publications, 1.69%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 78, 1.61%
Netherlands
78 publications, 1.61%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 64, 1.32%
Australia
64 publications, 1.32%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 58, 1.2%
Spain
58 publications, 1.2%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 50, 1.03%
Belgium
50 publications, 1.03%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 49, 1.01%
Israel
49 publications, 1.01%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 48, 0.99%
Austria
48 publications, 0.99%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 47, 0.97%
Japan
47 publications, 0.97%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 46, 0.95%
Norway
46 publications, 0.95%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 45, 0.93%
Finland
45 publications, 0.93%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 43, 0.89%
Switzerland
43 publications, 0.89%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 35, 0.72%
Turkey
35 publications, 0.72%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 30, 0.62%
Ireland
30 publications, 0.62%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 28, 0.58%
New Zealand
28 publications, 0.58%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 26, 0.54%
Republic of Korea
26 publications, 0.54%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 24, 0.5%
Portugal
24 publications, 0.5%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 19, 0.39%
Singapore
19 publications, 0.39%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 18, 0.37%
Slovenia
18 publications, 0.37%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 18, 0.37%
Czech Republic
18 publications, 0.37%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 17, 0.35%
Denmark
17 publications, 0.35%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 13, 0.27%
Greece
13 publications, 0.27%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 12, 0.25%
South Africa
12 publications, 0.25%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 11, 0.23%
Pakistan
11 publications, 0.23%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 8, 0.17%
Iran
8 publications, 0.17%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 8, 0.17%
Luxembourg
8 publications, 0.17%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 7, 0.14%
Iraq
7 publications, 0.14%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 7, 0.14%
Malaysia
7 publications, 0.14%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 6, 0.12%
Estonia
6 publications, 0.12%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 6, 0.12%
Hungary
6 publications, 0.12%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 6, 0.12%
Colombia
6 publications, 0.12%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 0.12%
Poland
6 publications, 0.12%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 6, 0.12%
Yugoslavia
6 publications, 0.12%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 5, 0.1%
Russia
5 publications, 0.1%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 5, 0.1%
Argentina
5 publications, 0.1%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 5, 0.1%
Romania
5 publications, 0.1%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 5, 0.1%
Philippines
5 publications, 0.1%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.08%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 4, 0.08%
Oman
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.08%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 4, 0.08%
Tunisia
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 3, 0.06%
Bangladesh
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 3, 0.06%
Latvia
3 publications, 0.06%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.06%
UAE
3 publications, 0.06%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 3, 0.06%
USSR
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.04%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.04%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.04%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.04%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.04%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.04%
|
Bahamas
|
Bahamas, 1, 0.02%
Bahamas
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.02%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.02%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.02%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.02%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.02%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.02%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.02%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.02%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.02%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.02%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.02%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.02%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.02%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.02%
Chile
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Show all (41 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
USA
|
USA, 90, 33.71%
USA
90 publications, 33.71%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 39, 14.61%
Germany
39 publications, 14.61%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 39, 14.61%
Italy
39 publications, 14.61%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 25, 9.36%
Canada
25 publications, 9.36%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 21, 7.87%
United Kingdom
21 publications, 7.87%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 17, 6.37%
Sweden
17 publications, 6.37%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 16, 5.99%
Netherlands
16 publications, 5.99%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 14, 5.24%
Norway
14 publications, 5.24%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 11, 4.12%
Australia
11 publications, 4.12%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 10, 3.75%
Spain
10 publications, 3.75%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 10, 3.75%
Republic of Korea
10 publications, 3.75%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 10, 3.75%
Finland
10 publications, 3.75%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 8, 3%
Austria
8 publications, 3%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 8, 3%
Switzerland
8 publications, 3%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 7, 2.62%
Brazil
7 publications, 2.62%
|
France
|
France, 6, 2.25%
France
6 publications, 2.25%
|
China
|
China, 6, 2.25%
China
6 publications, 2.25%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 1.87%
Belgium
5 publications, 1.87%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 5, 1.87%
New Zealand
5 publications, 1.87%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 5, 1.87%
Czech Republic
5 publications, 1.87%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 1.5%
Estonia
4 publications, 1.5%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 1.5%
Portugal
4 publications, 1.5%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 1.5%
Ireland
4 publications, 1.5%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 1.5%
Singapore
4 publications, 1.5%
|
India
|
India, 3, 1.12%
India
3 publications, 1.12%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 1.12%
Japan
3 publications, 1.12%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.75%
Greece
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.75%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.75%
Israel
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.75%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.75%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.75%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.37%
Russia
1 publication, 0.37%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.37%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.37%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.37%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.37%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.37%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.37%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.37%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.37%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.37%
Romania
1 publication, 0.37%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.37%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.37%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.37%
Chile
1 publication, 0.37%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.37%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.37%
|
Show all (11 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|