Journal of Southeast Asian Studies

Cambridge University Press
ISSN:
00224634, 14740680, 18234127, 26008653
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
0.3
SJR
0.183
CiteScore
0.6
Categories
History
Sociology and Political Science
Geography, Planning and Development
Areas
Arts and Humanities
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1970-2025
journal names
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
J SOUTHEAST ASIAN ST
JATI-J SE ASIAN STUD
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
(332 citations)

Modern Asian Studies
(113 citations)

Journal of Asian Studies
(112 citations)
Top-3 organizations

National University of Singapore
(428 publications)

Australian National University
(119 publications)

University of Science, Malaysia
(42 publications)

National University of Singapore
(13 publications)

Cornell University
(4 publications)

University of Malaya
(4 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1068
Q1

Clinical Validation of a Targeted RNA-Sequencing Assay for Driver Gene Alteration Detection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Li J., Shi X., Zhang H., Lin X., Zheng S., Chen W., Zhou Y., Liang Z.
Q1
Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Flavonoids in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer via Immunomodulation: Progress to Date
Liang M., Huang Y., Huang S., Zhao Q., Chen Z., Yang S.
Q1
Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Identification of Somatic Genetic Variants in Superficial Vascular Malformations by Liquid Biopsy in a Cohort of 88 Patients from a French Hospital
El Sissy F.N., Bisdorff A., Perrier A., Guillerm E., Denis J., Favre L., Aubertin M., Eyries M., Coulet F.
Superficial vascular anomalies are complex disorders characterized by abnormal vascular growth. Next-generation sequencing has recently identified somatic genetic alterations associated with these malformations, offering new insights for targeted treatments. However, tissue biopsies for genetic testing can be invasive and difficult to obtain, especially in arteriovenous malformations (AVM) with hemorrhagic risks. A liquid biopsy, a non-invasive approach, offers a promising solution by detecting genetic mutations in cell-free DNA. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a liquid biopsy for the genetic analysis of patients with superficial vascular anomalies through cell-free DNA sampling. Additionally, it explored whether specific sampling sites, such as the afferent artery, nidus, and efferent vein, could enhance the sensitivity of detecting pathogenic variants in patients with AVM. A total of 88 patients were enrolled, including 55 with AVM and 33 with lymphatic malformations. For patients with AVM, cell-free DNA samples were collected from peripheral blood, efferent veins, afferent arteries, and the AVM nidus. In patients with lymphatic malformations, cystic lymphatic fluid was collected by a direct puncture during diagnostic procedures. A molecular analysis was performed using a targeted gene panel relevant to somatic alterations in solid tumors. Pathogenic variants were validated by digital polymerase chain reaction for patients with lymphatic malformations. Pathogenic variants were identified in 23.6% of patients with AVM, predominantly in MAP2K1 and KRAS genes, with higher sensitivity near the AVM nidus. In addition, pathogenic variants were identified in 27.3% of patients with lymphatic malformations, all involving the PIK3CA gene. Despite the lower sensitivity of a cell-free DNA analysis compared with a tissue biopsy, especially in patients with AVM, the detection rate suggests the utility for a cell-free DNA analysis, particularly when a tissue biopsy is not feasible. This study confirms the feasibility of using a cell-free DNA liquid biopsy for genotyping patients with superficial vascular anomalies, although a tissue biopsy remains the gold standard for comprehensive genetic profiling because of its higher sensitivity. A liquid biopsy offers a non-invasive option for molecular analysis that is useful as a preliminary or alternative approach when direct tissue sampling is not possible. Importantly, the sensitivity of cell-free DNA sampling in AVM appeared highest when obtained close to the nidus, indicating an optimal sampling location for future studies. Further research is needed to improve detection sensitivity, especially for samples taken near the nidus, to validate and strengthen these findings. Although our study focused on superficial/extra-cranial AVM, further research should assess the applicability of this approach to cerebral AVM, where a tissue biopsy is particularly risky.
Q1

Obecabtagene Autoleucel: First Approval
Lee A.
Obecabtagene autoleucel (AUCATZYL®) is a CD19-directed genetically modified autologous T cell immunotherapy which is being developed by Autolus for the treatment of hematological cancers and systemic lupus erythematosus. In comparison with other chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) therapies, obecabtagene autoleucel has a fast off-rate binder for CD19. Obecabtagene autoleucel received approval following positive results from the FELIX phase I/II trial in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and it is the first CAR T therapy that does not have mandatory Risk Evaluation Mitigation Strategy monitoring requirements. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of obecabtagene autoleucel leading to this first approval for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL.
Q1

Molecular Therapeutics in Development to Treat Hyperlipoproteinemia
Ahmad M., Hegele R.A.
Clinical endpoints caused by hyperlipoproteinemia include atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and acute pancreatitis. Emerging lipid-lowering therapies targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9), lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein C-III, and angiopoietin-like protein 3 represent promising advances in the management of patients with hyperlipoproteinemia. These therapies offer novel approaches for lowering pathogenic lipid and lipoprotein species, particularly in patients with serious perturbations who are not adequately controlled with conventional treatments or who are unable to tolerate them. Molecular targets for these novel therapeutic agents were identified and validated through genetic epidemiology studies. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors (e.g., monoclonal antibodies and small interfering RNA) have revolutionized hypercholesterolemia management by significantly reducing both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and major cardiovascular events. Genome editing of PCSK9 promises to provide a potential cure for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Several investigational lipoprotein(a)-targeting therapies aim to reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic valve disease, although definitive clinical endpoint studies remain to be completed. Inhibition of APOC3 messenger RNA expression by olezarsen and plozasiran significantly lowers plasma triglyceride levels and markedly reduces pancreatitis risk in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome. Finally, angiopoietin-like protein 3 inhibition by the monoclonal antibody evinacumab has transformed management of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Together, these novel agents expand the therapeutic cache, offering personalized lipid-lowering strategies for high-risk patients with hyperlipoproteinemia, improving clinical outcomes and addressing previously unmet medical needs.
Q1

Advances and Challenges in the Diagnosis of Leishmaniasis
Mehrotra S., Tiwari R., Kumar R., Sundar S.
Leishmaniasis remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in endemic regions with limited resources. Traditional diagnostic methods, including microscopy, culture, and serology, though widely utilized, often suffer from limitations such as variable sensitivity, time delays, and the need for specialized infrastructure. Some of these limitations have been addressed with the emergence of molecular diagnostic techniques. Quantitative PCR (q-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assays have improved the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, enabling species identification and detection of asymptomatic infections. Further, nanodiagnostics and portable sequencing technologies such as the MinION™, along with lab-on-chip platforms, are revolutionizing the diagnostic landscape of leishmaniasis by offering point-of-care (POC) options for remote settings and field-based diagnosis. This review provides an in-depth analysis of these cutting-edge advances, discusses their application in resource-constrained settings, and evaluates their potential to reshape the future of leishmaniasis diagnosis and management.
Q1

A miRNA-Based Approach in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Challenges and Insights from Adult to Pediatric Evidence
Vitulano C., Forcina G., Colosimo S., Frattolillo V., Villani A.V., Marzuillo P., Miraglia del Giudice E., Di Sessa A.
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) represents the most common inherited kidney disorder leading to kidney failure in a significant percentage of patients over time. Although previously considered as an adult disease, robust evidence demonstrated that clinical manifestations might occur during childhood and adolescence. Therefore, early identification and treatment of the disease are of cardinal importance for pediatricians to ensure the best long-term outcomes. To date, licensed treatment options are limited but promising potential therapeutic targets are emerging. Among these, an intriguing pathophysiological role for microRNAs as small molecules with a critical role in regulating gene expression has been considered possible in ADPKD. Indeed, numerous circulating microRNAs have been found to be dysregulated in ADPKD, suggesting their potential role as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Based on this background, further detailed insights into the mechanisms of miRNAs contributing to ADPKD development might pave the way for their effective application as a targeted treatment in young patients with ADPKD. We aimed to summarize the most recent evidence in this fascinating research area, providing a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of specific microRNAs in ADPKD as a potential innovative therapeutic strategy for these young patients.
Q1

Development of a New Rapid Simultaneous Molecular Assay for the Detection of STI Pathogens and Drug Resistance-Associated Mutations
Michibuchi M., Yoshikane T., Matsuba Y., Yamazaki T., Hatakeyama S., Takanashi M., Oikawa T., Suzuki H.
In the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, there has been a demand for multiple molecular assays to rapidly and simultaneously detect not only pathogens but also drug resistance-associated mutations. In this study, we developed a new rapid simultaneous molecular assay for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and M. genitalium macrolide (23S rRNA gene, A2058/A2059) and fluoroquinolone (ParC gene, S83I) drug resistance-associated mutations in approximately 35 minutes. We evaluated the basic and prospective clinical performance of the newly developed assay. The newly developed assay showed sufficient sensitivity to detect N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, T. vaginalis, and M. genitalium relative to the reference method. In a prospective study comparing the reference method across 178 urine samples from men and women, the total concordance rate, sensitivity, and specificity of the two assays for N. gonorrhoeae detection were 98.9% (176/178), 97.9% (46/47), and 99.2% (130/131), respectively; for C. trachomatis detection, they were 98.3% (175/178), 96.4% (81/84), and 100% (94/94); and for M. genitalium detection, they were 100% (178/178), 100% (20/20), and 100% (158/158). All samples were negative for T. vaginalis. Of the 16 M. genitalium-positive samples analyzed for the GENECUBETM assay, 81.3% (13/16) had A2058/A2059 mutations, 31.3% (5/16) had S83I mutations, and 25.0% (4/16) had simultaneous mutations, which was highly correlated with the sequence analysis. This study suggests that the recently developed assay performed similarly to existing nucleic acid amplification tests and enables rapid and simultaneous detection, including the detection of drug resistance-associated mutations.
Q1

Multicenter In-House Evaluation of an Amplicon-Based Next−Generation Sequencing Panel for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling
Jantus-Lewintre E., Rappa A., Ruano D., van Egmond D., Gallach S., Gozuyasli D., Durães C., Costa J.L., Camps C., Lacroix L., Kashofer K., van Wezel T., Barberis M.
Predicting response to targeted cancer therapies increasingly relies on both simple and complex genetic biomarkers. Comprehensive genomic profiling using high-throughput assays must be evaluated for reproducibility and accuracy compared with existing methods. This study is a multicenter evaluation of the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA Plus) Pan-Cancer Research Panel for comprehensive genomic profiling of solid tumors. A series of 193 research samples (125 DNA and 68 RNA samples) was analyzed to evaluate the correlation and concordance of the OCA Plus panel with orthogonal methods, as well as its reproducibility (n = 5 DNA samples) across laboratories. The success rate for DNA and RNA sequencing was 96.6% and 89.7%, respectively. In a single workflow, the OCA Plus panel provided a detailed genomic profile with a high success rate for all biomarkers tested: single nucleotide variants/indels, copy number variants, and fusions, as well as complex biomarkers such as microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, and homologous recombination deficiency. The concordance for single nucleotide variants/indels was 94.8%, for copy number variants 96.5%, for fusions 94.2%, for microsatellite instability 80.8%, for tumor mutational burden 81.3%, and for homologous recombination deficiency 100%. The results showed high reproducibility across the five European research centers, each analyzing shared pre-characterized tissue biopsies (average of 1890 single nucleotide variants/indels per sample). This multicenter evaluation of the OCA Plus panel confirms the results of previous single-center studies and demonstrates the high reproducibility and accuracy of this assay.
Q1

The Role of [18F]F-FDG PET/CT for Predicting Histology and Prognosis in Patients with Thymic Lesions
Pizzuto D.A., Castello A., Chiappetta M., Castellani M., Annunziata S., Campanella A., Calabrese G., Cattaneo M., Rosso L., Cusumano G., Lococo F., Mendogni P.
To investigate whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ([18F]F-FDG PET/CT) metabolic parameters were associated with histology and to assess their prognostic role in patients with thymic lesions. In total, 116 patients (49/67 M/F; mean age 59.5 years) who underwent preoperative [18F]F-FDG PET/CT and thymectomy from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Associations between histology and metabolic parameters (maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), ratio between target lesion and liver SUVmax (rPET), quotient of SUVpeak in the tumor residual and SUVmean in a 20-cm3 volume of interest (qPET), and tumor-to-mediastinum (T/M) were analyzed. Freedom from recurrence (FFR) was determined and compared using the Kaplan–Meier and the log-rank test. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 14–72 months). In total, 27 thymic hyperplasia, 41 low-risk thymomas (LRT) (types A, AB, and B1), and 48 high-risk thymomas (HRT) (B2, B3 thymoma, and carcinoma) were included. SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, rPET, qPET, and T/M were significantly higher in HRT than LRT and hyperplasia (p < 0.001). TLG and MTV were significantly higher in patients with LRT (p < 0.001). Only rPET, qPET, and T/M remained significantly higher in HRT than in LRT subgroups (p = 0.042, p = 0.049, and p = 0.028, respectively). SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak cutoffs of < 4.3, < 2.87, and 4.03, respectively, significantly distinguished patients with longer FFR (p = 0.009, p = 0.05, and p = 0.05). Positron emission tomography (PET) metabolic parameters could help to differentiate thymic histotypes. Standardized uptake value (SUV)-based parameters appear promising to predict recurrent disease.
Q1

Author’s Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Prognostic and Clinical Significance of Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I Expression in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis’’
Qiao W., Jia Z., Guo W., Liu Q., Guo X., Deng M.
Q1
Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Real-World Evidence of the Prevalence of Driver Mutations in Anorectal Melanoma
Jutten E., van Kempen L.C., Diercks G.F., van Leeuwen B.L., Kruijff S., Wevers K.P.
Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with an aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Recently, recurrent gene mutations related to anorectal melanoma have been identified in a small series of cases, and this holds promise for targeted therapies, analogous to cutaneous melanoma. The purpose of this study was to analyze testing rates and prevalence of mutations in anorectal melanoma in the Dutch population. The Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank were queried for all patients with a diagnosis of anorectal melanoma (2009–2019) and for whom a molecular analysis was performed. The genes that were tested and mutations that were reported were recorded. Mutation status was correlated with clinical characteristics. In the period 2009–2019, 121 patients were diagnosed with anorectal melanoma. A molecular analysis was performed for 81 (67%) using single gene testing and various next-generation sequencing panels. Testing rates increased from 53% in 2009–2012 to 73% in 2016–2019. In 29/81 (36%) analyzed tumors, one or more mutations were reported: mutations in KIT (16/70, 23%), CTNNB1 (3/20, 15%), NRAS (6/60, 10%), BRAF non-V600E (4/74, 5%), GNAS (1/19, 5%), KRAS (1/28, 4%), BRAF V600E (1/74, 1%), and SF3B1 (1/1). In this cohort, a positive correlation was found between BRAF mutation status and age. Mutation status did not correlate with sex, date of diagnosis, tumor stage or surgical treatment. Survival was not influenced by any mutation status. KIT was the most frequently mutated gene in the 81 analyzed anorectal melanomas in the period 2009–2019. With the increasing testing rates and use of next generation sequencing, the molecular landscape of anorectal melanomas is gradually being revealed. Adoption of broad mutation analysis will reveal potentially actionable targets for treatment of patients with anorectal melanoma.
Q1

Acknowledgement to Referees
Q1
Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Inner Ear Gene Therapy: An Overview from Bench to Bedside
Gadenstaetter A.J., Krumpoeck P.E., Landegger L.D.
Hearing loss represents a highly prevalent and debilitating sensory disorder affecting roughly one in five people worldwide. In a majority of patients with congenital hearing loss, genetic mutations cause the disease. Up until recently, therapeutic options for individuals with hearing loss were limited to hearing aids and different types of auditory implants. However, after numerous years of intensive basic and translational research, gene therapy strategies are now being investigated in clinical trials. First results show significant hearing improvement in treated patients, highlighting gene therapy’s role as a promising treatment for certain forms of genetic hearing loss. In this article, we provide an overview of genetic hearing loss and inner ear gene therapy research including relevant strategies that have been established in animal models and will likely be investigated in human patients soon. Furthermore, we summarize and contextualize the novel findings of recently completed and ongoing clinical trials, and discuss future hurdles needed to be overcome to allow for a broad and safe clinical application of inner ear gene therapy.
Q1

Triple Tracer PET in Advanced Prostate Cancer: Chasing Phenotypic Plasticity
Urso L., Brunelli M., Filippi L.
Q1
Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
332 citations, 4.22%
|
|
Modern Asian Studies
113 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Journal of Asian Studies
112 citations, 1.43%
|
|
South East Asia Research
103 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Indonesia and the Malay World
95 citations, 1.21%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
72 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Asian Studies Review
66 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Journal of Contemporary Asia
63 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology
59 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Critical Asian Studies
58 citations, 0.74%
|
|
TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia
57 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Southeast Asia: History and Culture
44 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Journal of Peasant Studies
43 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Itinerario
41 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
41 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography
37 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Religions
36 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Asian Ethnicity
34 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of Interdisciplinary History
33 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Geoforum
30 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Moussons
30 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Comparative Studies in Society and History
29 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Inter-Asia Cultural Studies
28 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Asia Pacific Viewpoint
28 citations, 0.36%
|
|
American Ethnologist
25 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
24 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Small Wars and Insurgencies
23 citations, 0.29%
|
|
World Development
22 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
21 citations, 0.27%
|
|
History Compass
21 citations, 0.27%
|
|
The Australian Journal of Anthropology
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Pacific Review
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Review of Faith and International Affairs
19 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Asian Studies
19 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Anthropological Forum
19 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Antiquity
18 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Archaeological Research in Asia
17 citations, 0.22%
|
|
East Asian Science, Technology and Society
17 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
17 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Political Geography
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Environment and Planning A
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Global History
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Cogent Arts and Humanities
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Religion
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Enterprise and Society
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Human Ecology
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Cogent Social Sciences
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
(Re)presenting Brunei Darussalam
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
East Asia
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Linguistic Approaches to Literature
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Ethnic and Racial Studies
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Asian Population Studies
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Land
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Religion Compass
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Historical Sociology
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
World Archaeology
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Asian Politics and Policy
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
History and Anthropology
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Vietnamese Studies
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Springer Geography
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Current Anthropology
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Business History
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of World Prehistory
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Antipode
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Progress in Human Geography
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Contemporary Buddhism
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Cliometrica
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
PLoS ONE
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Economic History Review
10 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Asian Journal of Political Science
10 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Global Environmental Change
10 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Historical Journal
10 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Asian and Pacific Migration Journal
10 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Land Use Policy
10 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Ethnos
10 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
10 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Annals of the Association of American Geographers
10 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Asian Journal of Comparative Law
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Anthropologist
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Intelligence and National Security
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Material Religion
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Agrarian Change
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Social Anthropology
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Sustainability
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Geo Journal
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Urban Studies
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Third World Quarterly
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Ethnography
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Youth Studies
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Australian Economic History Review
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Development and Change
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Asian anthropology
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1679 citations, 21.36%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1356 citations, 17.25%
|
|
Wiley
531 citations, 6.76%
|
|
Springer Nature
519 citations, 6.6%
|
|
SAGE
405 citations, 5.15%
|
|
Elsevier
382 citations, 4.86%
|
|
Oxford University Press
145 citations, 1.85%
|
|
MDPI
84 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Emerald
75 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
69 citations, 0.88%
|
|
MIT Press
46 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Brill
45 citations, 0.57%
|
|
OpenEdition
45 citations, 0.57%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
44 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Japan Society for Southeast Asian Studies
44 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Duke University Press
39 citations, 0.5%
|
|
University of California Press
30 citations, 0.38%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
27 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Institut fur Asienkunde
22 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
18 citations, 0.23%
|
|
CAIRN
18 citations, 0.23%
|
|
IOP Publishing
17 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
EDP Sciences
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
AOSIS
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Association Archipel
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Annual Reviews
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Intellect
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
AIP Publishing
6 citations, 0.08%
|
|
University of Illinois Press
6 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Academy of Medicine Singapore
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Academy of Management
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Universite de Lille
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IGI Global
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Berghahn Books
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Center for Western Studies
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Adelaide
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institution for Marine and Island Cultures, Mokpo National University
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Asian Studies at the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
BMJ
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Royal Society
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Editions Odile Jacob
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Index Copernicus
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association de Geographes Francais
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Architectural Institute of Japan
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Wayne State University Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
James Cook University
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Alcohol and Drugs History Society
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Spanish Association of Economic History
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Seismological Society of America (SSA)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Surey Beatty & Sons
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Association for Triple helix and Future strategy studies
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Project MUSE
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japan Society of Tropical Ecology
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
King Saud University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Indiana University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Kyushu University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Cluj University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research/Max-Planck-institut fur Demografische Forschung
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Crop Science Society of America
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Noncommercial Partnership Editorial Board Polis
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Human Geographical Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
National University of Singapore
428 publications, 12.61%
|
|
Australian National University
119 publications, 3.51%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
42 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Cornell University
38 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Monash University
33 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Ohio State University
30 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Malaya
27 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Leiden University
27 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
25 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Hull
25 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Sydney
22 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
21 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Northern Illinois University
20 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Auckland
18 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Melbourne
18 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Uppsala University
17 publications, 0.5%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
16 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Arizona State University
15 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Murdoch University
14 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Michigan
14 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
12 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
12 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
12 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Yale University
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Canterbury
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Queensland
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Flinders University
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Washington
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
11 publications, 0.32%
|
|
La Trobe University
10 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of the Philippines Manila
10 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Wollongong
9 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
8 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
8 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Harvard University
8 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
8 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Brown University
8 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Université Laval
8 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Boston University
7 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Hamburg University
7 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Göttingen
7 publications, 0.21%
|
|
York University
7 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University College London
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Macquarie University
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Columbia University
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Georgetown University
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of South Florida
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Lancaster University
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
San Jose State University
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of New England
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Heidelberg University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
King's College London
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Western Australia
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Adelaide
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Griffith University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Kyoto University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Ateneo de Manila University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Ohio University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Utrecht University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Sophia University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Temple University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Alberta
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Delaware
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Bilkent University
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Lund University
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Örebro University Hospital
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Oslo
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Southern Queensland
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Mahidol University
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Naresuan University
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Chicago
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Bielefeld University
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Tokyo
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
École pratique des hautes études
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Ege University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Stockholm University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Xiamen University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Massey University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of South Australia
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Tasmania
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
National University of Singapore
13 publications, 4.44%
|
|
University of Malaya
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Australian National University
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Ege University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Sydney
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Wollongong
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Tasmania
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Flinders University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Charles Darwin University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Naresuan University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Northwestern University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Kyoto University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Ateneo de Manila University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Calgary
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Bilkent University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Jadavpur University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Monash University Malaysia
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Huaqiao University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Deakin University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of the Sunshine Coast
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Boston University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Princeton University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
State University of Malang
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Thammasat University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Colorado State University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Virginia Tech
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Ohio State University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of California, Davis
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Lancaster University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Leiden University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Purdue University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Leeds
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Tokyo
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Hiroshima University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Nihon University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Temple University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Victoria
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Trent University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Wake Forest University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Miami University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Singapore University of Technology and Design
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Show all (35 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 527, 15.53%
Singapore
527 publications, 15.53%
|
USA
|
USA, 506, 14.91%
USA
506 publications, 14.91%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 306, 9.02%
Australia
306 publications, 9.02%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 99, 2.92%
United Kingdom
99 publications, 2.92%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 92, 2.71%
Malaysia
92 publications, 2.71%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 79, 2.33%
Netherlands
79 publications, 2.33%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 52, 1.53%
Germany
52 publications, 1.53%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 51, 1.5%
Canada
51 publications, 1.5%
|
China
|
China, 43, 1.27%
China
43 publications, 1.27%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 39, 1.15%
New Zealand
39 publications, 1.15%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 34, 1%
Japan
34 publications, 1%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 32, 0.94%
Sweden
32 publications, 0.94%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 29, 0.85%
Thailand
29 publications, 0.85%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 25, 0.74%
Philippines
25 publications, 0.74%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 20, 0.59%
Indonesia
20 publications, 0.59%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 19, 0.56%
Italy
19 publications, 0.56%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 10, 0.29%
Brunei
10 publications, 0.29%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 8, 0.24%
Denmark
8 publications, 0.24%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 8, 0.24%
Turkey
8 publications, 0.24%
|
India
|
India, 7, 0.21%
India
7 publications, 0.21%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 7, 0.21%
Norway
7 publications, 0.21%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 7, 0.21%
Czech Republic
7 publications, 0.21%
|
France
|
France, 5, 0.15%
France
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 5, 0.15%
Vietnam
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 4, 0.12%
Papua New Guinea
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 3, 0.09%
Puerto Rico
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.09%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.06%
Russia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 2, 0.06%
Azerbaijan
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.06%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.06%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.06%
Spain
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.06%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.06%
Finland
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.06%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.03%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.03%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Timor-Leste
|
Timor-Leste, 1, 0.03%
Timor-Leste
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.03%
Israel
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 1, 0.03%
Cambodia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.03%
Malta
1 publication, 0.03%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.03%
UAE
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.03%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.03%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.03%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (14 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
USA
|
USA, 31, 10.58%
USA
31 publications, 10.58%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 19, 6.48%
Australia
19 publications, 6.48%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 19, 6.48%
Singapore
19 publications, 6.48%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 7, 2.39%
Canada
7 publications, 2.39%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 2.05%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 2.05%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 6, 2.05%
Malaysia
6 publications, 2.05%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 1.71%
Indonesia
5 publications, 1.71%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 1.71%
Japan
5 publications, 1.71%
|
China
|
China, 4, 1.37%
China
4 publications, 1.37%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 1.02%
Italy
3 publications, 1.02%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 1.02%
Thailand
3 publications, 1.02%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 1.02%
Turkey
3 publications, 1.02%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 2, 0.68%
Brunei
2 publications, 0.68%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.68%
India
2 publications, 0.68%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.68%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.68%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.68%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.68%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 0.34%
Germany
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.34%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.34%
Israel
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.34%
Malta
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.34%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.34%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|