Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
0.6
SJR
0.454
CiteScore
1.2
Categories
Linguistics and Language
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1967-1971, 1973, 1975-1995, 1997-2025
journal names
Folia Linguistica
FOLIA LINGUIST
Top-3 citing journals

Studies in Language Companion Series
(171 citations)

Lingua
(134 citations)

Folia Linguistica
(123 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
(11 publications)

University of Zurich
(10 publications)

National Research University Higher School of Economics
(9 publications)

National Research University Higher School of Economics
(8 publications)

University of Helsinki
(8 publications)

Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
(7 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 311
Q3

Validation and implementation of an intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay and workflow: practical advice for endocrine surgery centres
Staibano P., Ahmed B., Ivica J., Macri J., Au M., Zhang H., Pasternak J.D., Bhandari M., Kavsak P.
Abstract
Objectives
Intraoperative PTH (IOPTH) can be challenging to offer through central laboratories despite its clinical benefit. We describe the implementation of a central laboratory-based IOPTH assay and workflow in a tertiary care centre.
Methods
The Elecsys® PTH STAT assay was assessed in EDTA plasma on the Cobas® e411 analyzer. Assay validation included precision, linearity, coefficient of variation (CV), accuracy, stability, and dilution. Samples were transported to the central laboratory and resulted via telephone to the operating room. We describe a case series of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) who underwent parathyroid surgery using our described IOPTH workflow.
Results
Within- and between-day CV was ≤3.0 % for quality control material that ranged from 2.2–44.6 pmol/L. Passing–Bablok regression yielded a slight proportional negative bias between the two Cobas e411 instruments [Elecsys® PTH our centre=0.95 (95 % CI: 0.90–1.00) × Elecsys® PTH Toronto − 0.05 (95 % CI: −0.20 to 0.09) (n=22)], but high correlation (r=0.99) as compared to PTH measured on the Vitros® XT 7600 analyzer [Elecsys® PTH=0.91 (95 % CI: 0.73–1.1) × Vitros® PTH + 0.1 (95 % CI: −0.34 to 0.76), r=0.96 (n=40)]. The mean operating time across ten patients surgically cured for PHPT was 47.1 min (±9.1) and no patients required intraoperative frozen tissue analysis.
Conclusions
The Elecsys® PTH STAT assay demonstrated acceptable analytical performance, and the described IOPTH workflow was implemented successfully via a collaborative hospital-wide initiative. We discuss our model to help guide other institutions in implementing and improving IOPTH workflows.
Q3

The impact of mutational burden, spliceosome and epigenetic regulator mutations on transfusion dependency in dysplastic neoplasms
Strasser B., Mustafa S., Steindl R., Heibl S., Mandl J., Lirk G., Haushofer A.
Abstract
Objectives
Myelodysplastic neoplasms and dysplastic chronic myelomonocytic leukemia are characterized by cytopenia. Therefore, transfusion dependency is high in these dysplastic neoplasms. We investigated the impact of molecular genetics on the transfusion dependency in dysplastic neoplasms.
Methods
We investigated the impact of the myeloid mutation burden on transfusion dependency in myelodysplastic neoplasms and dysplastic chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. In addition, the effect of different functional genetic groups, such as spliceosomes and epigenetic regulator gene mutations, on transfusion dependency was assessed in these patients. Confounding transfusion triggers were ruled out by the patient selection criteria and regression analyses.
Results
A greater number of mutations lead to a higher transfusion dependency for red blood cells and platelet concentrates. A higher transfusion dependency was associated with a higher transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Spliceosome mutations were associated with a higher transfusion dependency of red blood cell concentrates than epigenetic regulator mutations.
Conclusions
Molecular genetics has the potential to improve the precision of patient blood management in dysplastic neoplasms.
Q3

Congress report: 6th German POCT symposium, September 25–26, 2024, Bremen
Luppa P.B., Petersmann A.
Q3

A comparative study between the Chrono-log 700 and the Sysmex CS-2100i analyzers for assessing ristocetin cofactor activity in patients with von Willebrand disease
Boulassel M., Abdellatif H., Al-Falahi K., Al-Hashmi F., Bouchareb Y., Al-Abri B., Al-Jahdhami H.
Abstract
Objectives
A variety of methods are currently used to measure von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity, but still the VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assay using the manual aggregometry technique is the reference method, even having high inter-laboratory variability. The automated coagulation analyzers offer several advantages for routine testing. Herein the performance of the automated Sysmex CS2000/2100i analyzer was compared to the manual aggregometer Chrono-log 700 for assessing VWF:Co activity in patients suspected of having von Willebrand disease (VWD).
Methods
Plasma samples from 136 patients were prospectively collected, and blindly analyzed on both instruments, simultaneously. Linear regression analysis, Bland-Altman test, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and area under receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the performance of the automated VWF:RCo assay.
Results
There was a strong positive correlation between the two assays (r=0.86, p<0.0001) with an excellent reliability ICC value of 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.74–0.86). A very good degree of agreement between the two assays was also evidenced with an estimated bias of −0.055 (−0.58 to 0.46). The ROC curve for the automated VWF:RCo assay was 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.78–0.92; p<0.0001). Using a cut-off value of 0.44 UI/mL for VWF:RCo activity, the sensitivity and specificity values were 91.2 %, and 88.2 % for the automated assay. The positive and negative positive values for VWD detection were 72.9 %, and 96.7 %, respectively.
Conclusions
Collectively, these findings indicate that the automated VWF:RCo assay yields comparable results to the manual aggregometry assay, with very good accuracy and precision to help diagnose patients suspected with VWD.
Q3

Platelet clump assessment using the Cellavision peripherical blood application – do we need manual microscopy?
Janel A.
Abstract
Objectives
This study aims to investigate the frequency, detection, and distribution of platelet clumps, assess the performance of automated digital microscopy (Cellavision) for detecting platelet clumps and explore strategies to optimize detection efficiency.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 987,586 hemograms to evaluate the frequency of platelet clumps, and a study of 246 hemograms with platelet clumps for manual and digital microscopic reviews of blood smears. We investigated the locations and sizes of these clumps along the smear, and evaluated the detection capacity of the Cellavision system.
Results
Platelet clumps were found in 0.29 % of cases, with a higher incidence in pediatric and elderly populations. Platelet clumps were more frequent and larger at the smear periphery. Cellavision achieved 93 % sensitivity when combining the leukocyte and red blood cell observation fields. The strategy of reviewing only selected cases (platelet count <50 × 109/L or history of clumps) detected 97 % of platelet clumps, while reducing manual reviews by fourfold.
Conclusions
Automated digital microscopy is an effective tool for detecting platelet clumps, but it requires manual review in specific cases. Expanding image acquisition to the feather edge could further improve detection. A combined approach maximizes efficiency and ensures diagnostic accuracy, particularly in critical cases with low platelet counts.
Q3

Serum soluble endorphin combined with BISAP score predicts severe acute pancreatitis combined with septic shock
Yuan J., Yang Q., Chen C.
Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the diagnostic value of serum soluble endorphin (sENG) combined with BISAP score for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) complicated with septic shock.
Methods
A total of 150 cases of SAP complicated with sepsis were selected and categorized into the group with shock (n=88) and the group without shock (n=42). The general clinical data and laboratory indexes of the two groups were compared. The factors affecting the occurrence of septic shock were explored, and the correlation between serum sENG, BISAP, APACHEII, and SOFA scores was analyzed. The value of sENG and BISAP scores for diagnosis of SAP complicated with sepsis was assessed.
Results
APACHEII score, SOFA score, BISAP score, and serum sENG levels were higher in the group that developed septic shock. Increased BISAP score and elevated serum sENG level were independent risk factors for septic shock in patients with SAP. sENG level was positively correlated with BISAP score, APACHEII, and SOFA score in patients with SAP-complicated sepsis, and BISAP score was also positively correlated with APACHEII and SOFA score. sENG level and BISAP score had a predictive value for patients with SAP complicated with septic shock (AUC=0.723, 0.703), and the combination of the two had the highest value for the diagnosis of SAP complicated with septic shock (AUC=0.838). In addition, the AUC values of the two in predicting poor prognostic outcomes in patients with SAP complicated with sepsis were 0.757 and 0.706, respectively, and the AUC of the combination was 0.796.
Conclusions
Serum sENG and BISAP scores are predictors of septic shock in patients with SAP, and the combination of the two has a more powerful predictive effect and better evaluation significance.
Q3

Q3

Upregulation of hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 in peripheral blood monocytes is associated with coronary heart disease
Li S., Shi M., Gele T., Zhang A., Li W., Sun Y., Wang C., Zhao J., Pei L., Liu J., Jia M.
Abstract
Objectives
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are known to be associated with cardiovascular diseases. At present, an ideal biomarker for the early diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD) is still lacking.
Methods
We screened differentially expressed circRNAs (DEcircRNAs) in the peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) of patients with CHD, using the microarray technology in comparing the transcriptome. We identified upregulated and downregulated circRNAs. At the same time, we collected the patient clinical medical records and the PBMCs, the above results were analyzed and validated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), using 374 patients.
Results
We identified 183 upregulated and 41 downregulated circRNAs. Among these DEcircRNAs, hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 was significantly upregulated in a cohort of 297 patients with CHD and 77 non-CHD controls. Among patients with CHD, hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 was significantly upregulated in the unstable angina pectoris (UAP) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) subgroups compared to the stable angina pectoris (SAP) subgroup. By dividing hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 expression into quartiles, we observed that the highest hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 expression quartile was a risk factor for CHD compared to the lowest quartile (odds ratio [OR]: 2.709; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.126–6.519, p=0.026), after adjusting for the traditional risk factors (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], smoking, alcohol, C-reactive protein [CRP], small and dense low-density lipoprotein [sdLDL] and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 [LP-PLA2]).
Conclusions
These data suggest that upregulated hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 in PBMCs is a risk factor for CHD and could be used as a biomarker of CHD.
Q3

The trend of Epstein-Barr virus DNA loads and CD8+ T lymphocyte numbers can predict the prognosis of pediatric liver transplant recipients with PTLD
Wang K., Xu D., Gao Y., Ma K., Zhao W.
Abstract
Objectives
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can cause lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in immunodeficiency individuals. The pathogenesis of EBV infection depends on its effective recognition and elimination. Our study investigated the effect of peripheral lymphocyte subsets (PLS) on the elimination of EBV.
Methods
A retrospective single-center study included 63 patients with 17 pediatric liver transplant recipients with EBV-induced PTLD (PTLD group) and 46 patients diagnosed with EBV-induced mononucleosis (IM group). Dynamic monitoring of PLS with EBV-DNA loads was performed.
Results
EBV-DNA replicated at a high level (5.2E3∼5.93E7 copies/mL in PBMC) before treatment in all patients in PTLD group. B lymphocytes were the main infected cells. After treatment with Rituximab, the EBV-DNA loads decreased below the lower limit of detection in 10 patients (PTLD-stable disease, PTLD-SD group), and the viral loads replicated at lower level in six patients (PTLD-partial response, PTLD-PR group). In the PTLD-SD group, the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes increased beyond the normal range with the ascending of EBV-DNA loads, then it decreased to the normal range accompanied by the clearance of EBV. In the PTLD-PR group, the CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes kept in the normal range, while the EBV kept on replication.
Conclusions
The increased number of CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes occurred in parallel with the decline in EBV-DNA loads, which is the most useful index in estimating the host capacity of immuno-surveillance against EBV.
Q3

Evaluation of different needle gauge blood collection sets (23G/25G) in aged patients
Rosada A., Friedrich K., Spieß E., Prpic M., Müller-Werdan U., Jahić A., Kappert K.
Abstract
Objectives
Aged patients are often characterized by difficult blood sampling conditions. Smaller needle gauge (G) may be beneficial for venous access and reduced pain perception, however, potentially at the expense of lower blood quality for laboratory measurements. We systematically compared two blood collection sets with different outer but equal inner diameters; different needle tips, and retract mechanisms in aged patients (Safety-Lok™, 23G, SL vs. UltraTouch™ Push Button, 25G, UT-PB) regarding clinical aspects and laboratory measurements.
Methods
Clinical examination and questionnaires were used in an aged cohort (n=161, average age=81.6 years), to determine characteristics of venipuncture, the phlebotomist’s assessment of blood draw including level of difficulty, and patient’s pain perception with either one or both blood collection sets. Sample quality was evaluated by laboratory analytics considering 13 parameters.
Results
SL, UT-PB, or both were used in 89 (55 %), 72 (45 %) or 36 (22 %) patients. The handling of the blood collection sets was perceived slightly easier for UT-PB compared to SL by the phlebotomist (−30 %, p=0.038). There was no significant difference in other parameters of the phlebotomist’s assessment or patients’ perception of blood collection. There was no clinically relevant difference between both sets in any of the laboratory measurements, including potassium and hemolysis index.
Conclusions
Clinical use of the UT-PB compared with SL in aged patients was associated with slight advantages of UT-PB, e.g. in the handling comfort for the phlebotomist. Sample quality, especially regarding hemolysis, was identical between both blood collecting sets, making its use uncritical in difficult venous conditions commonly seen in elderly patients.
Q3

Comparison between detection power of MBT STAR-Carba test and KBM CIM Tris II for carbapenemase-producing bacteria
Komatsu S., Fujinaga C., Nakanishi N.
Abstract
Objectives
The rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing bacteria is clinically important for selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry was used to detect carbapenemase activity.
Methods
In this study, we evaluated the detection power of MBT STAR-Carba test on identifying carbapenemase-producing bacteria isolated in Kobe city, Japan, compared with that of the KBM CIM Tris II kit using the modified procedure parameters. The obtained results were expressed as normalized logRQ values indicating a measure of hydrolysis efficiency.
Results
The MBT STAR-Carba test rapidly detected not only major carbapenemases, such as IMP-1 and IMP-6 that are most prevalent in Japan, but also GES-type and OXA-51-like carbapenemases, which are difficult to detect by reaction with inhibitors or KBM CIM Tris II by extending the incubation time.
Conclusions
The MBT STAR-Carba test will be beneficial in rapid identification of carbapenemases in clinical settings and environmental investigations.
Q3

Advances and challenges in platelet counting: evolving from traditional microscopy to modern flow cytometry
Chen Y., Hu Y., Hu H.
Abstract
Platelet counting is a fundamental clinical test for diagnosing haemorrhagic diseases, coagulation abnormalities, and certain autoimmune disorders, and it also serves as a critical basis for decisions regarding platelet transfusion. Common automated methods for platelet counting include the international harmonization protocol (IHP) based on flow cytometry, CD61 immunoplatelet count (CD61-imm), impedance platelet count (PLT-I), hybrid platelet count (PLT-H), optical platelet count (PLT-O), and fluorescence platelet count (PLT-F). The IHP, based on flow cytometry, is recommended as the reference measurement procedure (RMP) by the Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China, the International Council for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH), and the International Society of Laboratory Hematology (ISLH) due to its superior precision and accuracy. Despite the significant improvements in efficiency and standardization brought about by automation, traditional blood smear microscopic examination (PLT-M) remains indispensable in specific scenarios, such as low platelet counts or abnormal platelet morphology, to ensure the accuracy and reliability of platelet counting results from automated methods.
Q3

Q3

Clarithromycin crystalluria
Zhao W., Zhang T.
Q3

Revision of the “Guideline of the German Medical Association on Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratory Examinations – Rili-BAEK”
Ahmad-Nejad P., Bauersfeld W., Baum H., Behre H.M., Burkhardt R., Cassens U., Ceglarek U., Christmann M., Cremers J., Diedrich S., Döring S., Gässler N., Haase G., Haselmann V., Hofmann J., et. al.
Top-100
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
Studies in Language Companion Series
171 citations, 3.1%
|
|
Lingua
134 citations, 2.43%
|
|
Folia Linguistica
123 citations, 2.23%
|
|
Journal of Pragmatics
84 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Linguistics
78 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today
66 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Pragmatics and Beyond New Series
61 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Language Sciences
58 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Advances in Iranian Linguistics II
52 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Linguistic Typology
50 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Studies in Language
47 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Journal of Linguistics
44 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Constructional Approaches to Language
41 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Human Cognitive Processing
40 citations, 0.73%
|
|
English Language and Linguistics
39 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Transactions of the Philological Society
39 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Morphology
39 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Typological Studies in Language
37 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Journal of Historical Linguistics
36 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Word Structure
35 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
31 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Studia Linguistica
29 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Diachronica
28 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Functions of Language
27 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Languages
27 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Journal of Phonetics
25 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Glossa a journal of general linguistics
25 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
23 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Studies in Language Variation
23 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Cognitive Linguistics
21 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Phonology
21 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Meta
21 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Constructions and Frames
19 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Beitrage zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur
18 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Germanic Linguistics
18 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Linguistics Vanguard
18 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Studies in Language and Social Interaction
18 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of English Linguistics
17 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Language and Communication
17 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Language and Speech
16 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of French Language Studies
16 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Child Language
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Belgian Journal of Linguistics
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Language Typology and Universals
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Syntax
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Open Linguistics
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Romanische Philologie
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of the International Phonetic Association
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Language and Cognition
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Language Variation and Change
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SHS Web of Conferences
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Linguistics and Language Compass
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Linguistic Review
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nordic Journal of Linguistics
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Germanistische Linguistik
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
English Studies
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Linguistic Inquiry
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Studia Neophilologica
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Literacy Studies
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal not defined
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
First Language
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Acta Linguistica Academica
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Historiographia Linguistica
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
PLoS ONE
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
The Mental Lexicon
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Spanish in Context
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Langages
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
NOWELE
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Reading and Writing
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Langue Francaise
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Applied Psycholinguistics
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of American Linguistics
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Linguistic Variation
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Studies in Corpus Linguistics
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Linguistics
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Brain and Language
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Theoretical Linguistics
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Speech Communication
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Language and Linguistics
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Languages in Contrast
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Folia Linguistica Historica
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Australian Journal of Linguistics
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
987 citations, 17.91%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
515 citations, 9.34%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
505 citations, 9.16%
|
|
Elsevier
425 citations, 7.71%
|
|
Oxford University Press
330 citations, 5.99%
|
|
Springer Nature
222 citations, 4.03%
|
|
Wiley
200 citations, 3.63%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
181 citations, 3.28%
|
|
SAGE
109 citations, 1.98%
|
|
OpenEdition
55 citations, 1%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
47 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
42 citations, 0.76%
|
|
MDPI
38 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Open Library of Humanities
26 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Nakom
23 citations, 0.42%
|
|
MIT Press
21 citations, 0.38%
|
|
21 citations, 0.38%
|
|
19 citations, 0.34%
|
|
EDP Sciences
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Brill
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
CAIRN
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
The English Linguistic Society of Japan
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
The Royal Society
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Annual Reviews
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
S. Karger AG
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
SciELO
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IGI Global
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
F1000 Research
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Emerald
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Warsaw
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Human Kinetics
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Journal of Language Contact Publishers
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science Alert
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co, KG
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Academy Publication
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Universitat de Valencia
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Duke University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Peeters Publishers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Johann Ambrosius Barth
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Service des publications de l'Universite de Toulouse-Le Mirail
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Presses Universitaires de Rennes
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Unisa Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Groupe detude et de recherche en anglais de specialite
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Udmurt State University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Brazilian Society of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
La Lettre Volee
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education 束Moscow Pedagogical State University損 (MPGU)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
AOSIS
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
National Research Mordovia State University MRSU
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Gramota Publishing
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
AMO Publisher
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (67 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Zurich
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
9 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Ghent University
9 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Helsinki
9 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
8 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Stockholm University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Bern
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Zhejiang University
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Antwerp
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Pavia
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Cologne
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Vienna
5 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Ca' Foscari University of Venice
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Tartu
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Lund University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Bologna
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Shanghai International Studies University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Manchester
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Bergamo
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Pecs
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Leiden University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Regensburg
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Salamanca
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Jaume I University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Imam Khomeini International University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Tübingen
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Jordan
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Beijing Foreign Studies University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Xiamen University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Turin
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Oslo
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Trieste
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Insubria
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Roma Tre University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
La Trobe University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
James Cook University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Paris Cité University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Kassel
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Wuppertal
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Kiel University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Coimbra
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Sheffield
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Lodz
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Huelva
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Deusto
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
École pratique des hautes études
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Université de Lille
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Babes-Bolyai University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Russian State University for the Humanities
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Istanbul University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Al Ain University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Istanbul Medipol University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Isfahan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Farhangian University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Bu-Ali Sina University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Tongji University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Liège
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Central China Normal University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Southwest University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Geneva
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
8 publications, 2.62%
|
|
University of Helsinki
8 publications, 2.62%
|
|
Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
7 publications, 2.3%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
6 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Bern
6 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Zhejiang University
5 publications, 1.64%
|
|
Ghent University
5 publications, 1.64%
|
|
Stockholm University
5 publications, 1.64%
|
|
University of Zurich
5 publications, 1.64%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
4 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Ca' Foscari University of Venice
4 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Cologne
4 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
4 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
4 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Lund University
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Shanghai International Studies University
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Antwerp
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Manchester
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Pecs
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Leiden University
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
3 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Imam Khomeini International University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Jordan
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Beijing Foreign Studies University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Xiamen University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Turin
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Pavia
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Trieste
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
La Trobe University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
James Cook University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Paris Cité University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Regensburg
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Kassel
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Kiel University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Salamanca
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Coimbra
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Jaume I University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Tartu
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Deusto
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
École pratique des hautes études
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Babes-Bolyai University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Russian State University for the Humanities
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Istanbul University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Al Ain University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Istanbul Medipol University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Isfahan
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Farhangian University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Tübingen
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Bu-Ali Sina University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Tongji University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Central China Normal University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Southwest University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Yangzhou University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Sorbonne University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Sichuan International Studies University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Florence
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Pisa
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Xi'an Shiyou University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Messina
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Germany
|
Germany, 55, 3.22%
Germany
55 publications, 3.22%
|
China
|
China, 40, 2.34%
China
40 publications, 2.34%
|
USA
|
USA, 39, 2.28%
USA
39 publications, 2.28%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 26, 1.52%
Italy
26 publications, 1.52%
|
France
|
France, 25, 1.46%
France
25 publications, 1.46%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 25, 1.46%
Belgium
25 publications, 1.46%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 25, 1.46%
Spain
25 publications, 1.46%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 20, 1.17%
Switzerland
20 publications, 1.17%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 19, 1.11%
United Kingdom
19 publications, 1.11%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 18, 1.05%
Netherlands
18 publications, 1.05%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 18, 1.05%
Poland
18 publications, 1.05%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 12, 0.7%
Russia
12 publications, 0.7%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 12, 0.7%
Sweden
12 publications, 0.7%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 10, 0.58%
Finland
10 publications, 0.58%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 9, 0.53%
Canada
9 publications, 0.53%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 7, 0.41%
Austria
7 publications, 0.41%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 6, 0.35%
Hungary
6 publications, 0.35%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 0.23%
Estonia
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 0.23%
Portugal
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 0.23%
Iran
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 0.23%
Ireland
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 4, 0.23%
Chile
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 0.23%
Japan
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 0.18%
Australia
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.18%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.18%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.18%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.18%
Romania
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.18%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.12%
Israel
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.12%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.12%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.12%
Malta
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.12%
Norway
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.12%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.06%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.06%
Greece
1 publication, 0.06%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.06%
India
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.06%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.06%
UAE
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.06%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.06%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.06%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.06%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.06%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.06%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (16 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
China
|
China, 39, 12.79%
China
39 publications, 12.79%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 38, 12.46%
Germany
38 publications, 12.46%
|
USA
|
USA, 26, 8.52%
USA
26 publications, 8.52%
|
France
|
France, 18, 5.9%
France
18 publications, 5.9%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 18, 5.9%
Italy
18 publications, 5.9%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 17, 5.57%
Spain
17 publications, 5.57%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 14, 4.59%
United Kingdom
14 publications, 4.59%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 13, 4.26%
Belgium
13 publications, 4.26%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 12, 3.93%
Netherlands
12 publications, 3.93%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 12, 3.93%
Poland
12 publications, 3.93%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 12, 3.93%
Switzerland
12 publications, 3.93%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 11, 3.61%
Sweden
11 publications, 3.61%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 10, 3.28%
Russia
10 publications, 3.28%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 2.95%
Finland
9 publications, 2.95%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 6, 1.97%
Hungary
6 publications, 1.97%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 1.31%
Iran
4 publications, 1.31%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 1.31%
Canada
4 publications, 1.31%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 1.31%
Japan
4 publications, 1.31%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 0.98%
Australia
3 publications, 0.98%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.98%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.98%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.98%
Romania
3 publications, 0.98%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.98%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.98%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.98%
Chile
3 publications, 0.98%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 0.66%
Estonia
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.66%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.66%
Austria
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.66%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.66%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.66%
Malta
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.66%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.33%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.33%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.33%
Greece
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.33%
Israel
1 publication, 0.33%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.33%
India
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.33%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.33%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.33%
Norway
1 publication, 0.33%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.33%
UAE
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.33%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.33%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.33%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.33%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Show all (13 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
1 profile journal article
Rudnev Pavel
12 publications,
29 citations
h-index: 3
1 profile journal article
Wiltschko Martina
50 publications,
1 082 citations
h-index: 16