Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
1.7
SJR
0.704
CiteScore
3.1
Categories
Geography, Planning and Development
Political Science and International Relations
Sociology and Political Science
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2001-2025
journal names
Latin American Politics and Society
LAT AM POLIT SOC
Top-3 citing journals

Latin American Politics and Society
(556 citations)

SSRN Electronic Journal
(423 citations)
Journal of Politics in Latin America
(219 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Tulane University
(19 publications)

University of Texas at Austin
(16 publications)

Harvard University
(13 publications)

Harvard University
(5 publications)

Torcuato di Tella University
(5 publications)

Tulane University
(5 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 311
Q1

Wearable Sensors Based on Stretchable Organic Transistors
Liu Y., Ji D.
ABSTRACTOrganic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) hold potential for in‐sensor computing and wearable healthcare systems. Nevertheless, their inherent limitations in stretchability and conformability hinder their scalability and practical deployment. In a recent study, Liu et al. introduce a wearable in‐sensor computing platform that leverages stretchable OECTs, exhibiting over 50% elongation capability while preserving stable operational performance. This innovation enables the development of wearable systems that can accurately acquire biosignals.
Q1

Modulating Oxygen Affinity to Enhance Liquid Products for the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Monoxide
Chen J., Arce‐Ramos J.M., Katsounaros I., de Smit E., Abubakar S.M., Lum Y., Zhang J., Wang L.
ABSTRACTElectrocatalytic CO reduction (COR) offers a promising alternative approach for synthesizing valuable chemicals, potentially at a lower carbon intensity as compared to conventional chemical production. Cu‐based catalysts have shown encouraging selectivity and activity toward multi‐carbon (C2+) products, albeit typically in the form of a mixture. Steering COR selectivity toward specific types of C2+ products, such as liquid products with high energy density, remains a challenge. In this study, we developed a Cu/Zn bimetallic catalyst composite and demonstrated enhanced selectivity toward liquid products as compared to reference CuO and Cu‐based catalysts, approaching 60% at a high current density of 300 mA/cm2. Our investigation highlights that the introduction of Zn promoted the emergence of a Cu/Zn heterojunction interface during COR. Density functional theory simulations were used to rationalize the observed differences in selectivity, revealing that interface plays a crucial role in diminishing the oxygen adsorption at the Cu‐sites and modifying the adsorption energy of COR reaction intermediates, consequently leading to enhanced selectivity toward liquid products.
Q1

Preparation, Rheological Behavior, and Redispersibility of Bamboo‐Derived Holocellulose Nanofibers
Yin C., Wang X., Han Z., Yang H., Yang K., Zheng W., Guan Q., Yu S.
ABSTRACTWith the demand for sustainable preparation of nanocellulose, the extraction of holocellulose nanofibers with surface‐coated hemicellulose from various biomass is drawing more and more attention. However, detailed preparation processes and some fundamental properties of holocellulose nanofibers, such as rheological behavior and redispersibility, still need systematic investigation. An in‐depth understanding of these processes and properties plays a crucial role in guiding the preparation and subsequent material design of holocellulose nanofibers. Herein, a concise method is reported to prepare bamboo‐derived holocellulose nanofibers (BHCNFs) from bamboo residue and has been characterized in detail. To facilitate subsequent application, comprehensive exploration and understanding of the rheological behavior of BHCNF were conducted, along with an investigation into the redispersibility after freeze‐drying. The presence of hemicellulose significantly affects the rheological behavior and gives BHCNF a certain redispersibility. To achieve better redispersibility, aerogel powder was prepared via spray freeze‐drying, offering new insights into the drying and practical application of BHCNF.
Q1

Terminal Passivation–Induced Interface Decoupling for High‐Stability Two‐Dimensional Semiconductors
He J., Yan J., Xue T., Yuan L., Hu Y., Wang Z., Chen X., Huang Y., Han C., Li L., Hu W.
ABSTRACTTwo‐dimensional (2D) materials, such as MoS2, show exceptional potential for next‐generation electronics. However, the poor stability of these materials, particularly under long‐term operations and high temperature, impedes their practical applications. Here, we develop a terminal passivation interface decoupling (TPID) strategy to significantly improve the stability of MoS2, by mitigating the interaction between the substrate and the 2D material within the in‐situ growth process. Specifically, the strong electron‐withdrawing terminal group hydroxyl, prevalent on the oxide substrate, is passivated by carbon groups. Due to this, the structure of MoS2 materials remains stable during long‐term storage, and its electronic devices, field‐effect transistors (FETs), show remarkable operational and high‐temperature (400°C) stability over 60 days, with much‐improved performance. For example, mobility increases from 9.69 to 85 cm2/(V·s), the highest value for bottom‐up transfer‐free single crystal MoS2 FETs. This work provides a new avenue to solve reliability issues of 2D materials and devices, laying a foundation for their applications in the electronic industry.
Q1

High‐Performance Stable Hybrid Inorganic‐Organic Light‐Emitting Transistor
Huang H., Miao Z., Gao H., Cao J., Zheng Y., Gao C., Li X., Yuan G., Dong H.
ABSTRACTLight‐emitting transistors (LETs) as novel integrated optoelectronic devices demonstrate great potential applications in smart displays and visual intelligent perception. The construction of high‐performance area‐emission LETs with low power consumption and good reliability is urgently needed for advancing their applications, however, this integration has not been realized within a single device. Herein, we demonstrate a kind of planar‐driven hybrid LET (PDHLET) that makes use of the unique advantages of high mobility and stability of inorganic and organic semiconductors in the same device. By incorporating an indium‐zinc‐gallium‐oxide (InZnGeO) conducting layer and organic emissive layer, a high‐performance stable blue‐emissive PDHLET is constructed, giving a high Ion/Ioff ratio approaching 6.1 × 108 and a low Von of 5.5 V along with maximum brightness of 1264 cd/m2 as well as small VTH shift of 0.5 V after 1000 s positive stress bias. Finally, a systematic simulation, including charge concentration and Langevin recombination rate, is carried out on PDHLET for the first time, demonstrating good consistency with experimental results. This confirms the uniformity of high redistributed charge concentration in the InZnGeO conducting layer which thus enables good area emission. This study provides a new avenue for constructing high‐performance stable LETs to advance various field applications.
Q1

Mechanistic Insights and Advances in Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces for Efficient Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to C2 Products
Chen J., Xiao Y., Da Y., Chen G., Sun Y., Wang L., Zhang J., Chen W.
ABSTRACTElectrocatalytic CO2 reduction (ECR) is a promising approach to converting CO2 into chemicals and fuels. Among the ECR products, C2 products such as ethylene, ethanol, and acetate have been extensively studied due to their high industrial demands. However, the mechanistic understanding of C2 product formation remains unclear due to the lack of in situ or operando measurements that can observe the complex and instantaneous atomic evolutions of adsorbates at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Moreover, the sensitivity of ECR reactions to variations at the interface further widens the gap between mechanistic understanding and performance enhancement. To bridge this gap, first‐principle studies provide insights into how the interface influences ECR. In this study, we present a review of mechanistic studies investigating the effects of various factors at the interface, with an emphasis on the C2 product formation. We begin by introducing ECR and the essential metrics. Next, we discuss the factors classified by their components at the interface, namely, electrocatalyst, electrolyte, and adsorbates, respectively, and their effects on the C2 product formation. Due to the interplay among these factors, we aim to deconvolute the influence of each factor and clearly demonstrate their impacts. Finally, we outline the promising directions for mechanistic studies of C2 products.
Q1

Outside Front Cover: Volume 6 Issue 1
Yan Z., Cheng Q., Sun M., Wu B., Zhu Y., Tong Z., Li M., Jia C., Zhao P.
Q1

Outside Back Cover: Volume 6 Issue 1
Xie C., Qiu H., Liu L., You Y., Li H., Li Y., Sun Z., Lin J., An L.
Q1

Unveiling the Interfacial Properties of Organic Single‐Crystal Hole‐Transporting Layers for High‐Performance Light‐Emitting Devices
Ye G., Li S., Ding R., Guo R., Zhang H., Liu Z., Yang F., Sun L., Li Y., Du X., Wang X., Wang L., Liu Y., Fang H., Liu Y., et. al.
ABSTRACTOrganic single crystals with long‐range molecular periodic ordering ensure superior charge‐transport properties and low defect density, which have been considered promising candidates for charge‐transporting materials in organic light‐emitting devices (OLEDs). The functional interfaces of OLEDs play a critical role in charge‐transporting and light‐emitting behaviors, while the interfacial properties of organic single crystals in OLEDs and their impact on device performance have been rarely investigated. Herein, two typical organic single crystals, 1,4‐bis(4‐Methylstyryl)benzene (BSB‐Me) and 2,6‐diphenylanthracene (DPA) with different molecular formulas and packing structures, are introduced as the single‐crystal hole‐transporting layers (HTLs) for a systematic investigation of the interfacial properties between single‐crystal HTLs and active emissive layers. BSB‐Me single‐crystal HTLs offer satisfied surface wettability and enhanced interfacial interaction, which dominate the charge‐transporting and light‐emitting behaviors of the OLEDs. Such improved interfacial properties are responsible for the superior light out‐coupling efficiency of BSB‐Me single‐crystal OLEDs with efficient exciton recombination and minimal Joule heat loss. In consequence, BSB‐Me single‐crystal OLEDs exhibit a maximum luminance of 50,170 cd/m2 and a peak EQE of 8.78%, which are better than DPA‐based devices. Furthermore, BSB‐Me single‐crystal HTLs with favorable interfacial properties enable large‐area OLEDs with uniform EL emission over the whole light‐emitting area of 1 mm × 1 mm.
Q1

A Highly Ductile Composite of 3D‐Printed Poly(Lactic Acid) With InSe Particles and Flakes as a Filler
Li H., Yu Z., Liu B., Gao Y., Liu M., Zhang J., Ruoff R.S., Wang B.
ABSTRACTThe biodegradable polymer poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is brittle. PLA‐based composites reinforced by indium selenide (InSe) particles or flakes are prepared; each is found to have outstanding plasticity. InSe nanosheets are prepared by sonication of solid InSe in N‐methyl pyrrolidone, followed by washing/dispersion in ethanol, and subsequent drying. These InSe nanosheets, or in separate studies InSe particles, are mixed with PLA to make composite materials. The PLA composite materials are 3D‐printed into “dogbone” samples that are tensile‐loaded. The optimum dogbone specimen is 1.5 times stronger and 5.5 times tougher than neat PLA specimens prepared in the same way. To the best of our knowledge, this concurrent improvement in tensile strength and toughness has not been achieved before in PLA with any filler type. Finite element analysis, together with experimental analysis of (i) fracture surfaces, (ii) the PLA crystal structure, and (iii) the internal structure by micro‐CT scanning, suggests that the exceptional mechanical performance is due to the intrinsic properties of InSe and, particularly, the emergence of crack shielding and crack deflection at the interfaces of PLA and InSe flakes. These findings indicate that PLA–InSe composites may offer opportunities to broaden the applications of PLA composites, including as load‐bearing materials.
Q1

Functional Injectable Hydrogel for Bone Regeneration: Regulation of the circSRPK1/miR‐320a Axis and Targeting Multiple Osteogenic Pathways via CDH2 and Osterix Genes
Wang Y., Mao X., Li D., Zhao Y., Yang X., Zheng Z., Liu X., Lv Z., Cai X., Weng X., Zhang H., Feng B.
ABSTRACTHydrogels loaded with microRNA (miRNA) have shown promise in bone‐defect repair. Here, we present the first report of miRNA‐loaded hydrogels containing bioactivities to treat steroid‐induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (SONFH), based on the mechanism of competing endogenous RNAs. Transcriptome sequencing of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (HBMSCs) extracted from the proximal femoral bone marrow and subsequent functional assays revealed that the circSRPK1/miR‐320a axis promotes HBMSCs osteogenic differentiation. By incorporating antagomir‐320a (a miR‐320a inhibitor) encapsulated in liposomes into injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels, we constructed an injectable hydrogel, HA@antagomir‐320a. This hydrogel demonstrated exceptional osteogenic properties, targeting multiple osteogenic pathways via CDH2 and Osterix and exhibited excellent in vitro biocompatibility. In vivo, it substantially enhanced bone formation in the osteonecrotic area of the femoral head. This injectable HA@antagomir‐320a hydrogel, which exhibited exceptional biocompatibility and osteogenic properties in vivo and in vitro, offers a promising and minimally invasive solution for the treatment of SONFH.
Q1

Engineering Metal Nanoclusters at the Atomic Level for Effective Electrocatalysis
Mu C., Liu Z., Yao Q., He Q., Xie J.
ABSTRACTWith the advances of nanochemistry in the past several decades, a diverse set of nanomaterials has been developed as electrocatalysts with enhanced activity, selectivity, and durability for electrocatalytic reactions. However, it has remained as a long challenge to systematically understand the mechanism of electrocatalytic reactions, which involves multiple protons‐coupled electron transfer processes and varied products at the atomic level, intrinsically because of the complexity and polydispersity of the traditional nanomaterials. By sharp contrast, ligand‐protected metal nanoclusters (NCs) possess atomically precise structures and abundant active sites, facilitating their applications as effective model electrocatalysts for revealing the mechanism of electrocatalytic reactions. This review summarizes recent progress in atom‐level engineering of metal NCs as model catalysts for electrocatalytic reactions. Specifically, we first discuss the effects of metal composition engineering, including doping and size effects, on the electrocatalytic performance of metal NCs. Then similar electrocatalytic discussion extends to ligand effects of metal NCs, where ligand type and coverage engineering are deciphered. Moreover, we discuss how the overall charge and morphology of NCs modify their electrocatalytic performance. The fundamental and methodological insights summarized in this review should serve as useful references guiding the future development of effective metal electrocatalysts in diverse sectors of industry.
Q1

Machine Learning Approaches in Polymer Science: Progress and Fundamental for a New Paradigm
Xie C., Qiu H., Liu L., You Y., Li H., Li Y., Sun Z., Lin J., An L.
ABSTRACTMachine learning (ML), material genome, and big data approaches are highly overlapped in their strategies, algorithms, and models. They can target various definitions, distributions, and correlations of concerned physical parameters in given polymer systems, and have expanding applications as a new paradigm indispensable to conventional ones. Their inherent advantages in building quantitative multivariate correlations have largely enhanced the capability of scientific understanding and discoveries, thus facilitating mechanism exploration, target prediction, high‐throughput screening, optimization, and rational and inverse designs. This article summarizes representative progress in the recent two decades focusing on the design, preparation, application, and sustainable development of polymer materials based on the exploration of key physical parameters in the composition–process–structure–property–performance relationship. The integration of both data‐driven and physical insights through ML approaches to deepen fundamental understanding and discover novel polymer materials is categorically presented. Despite the construction and application of robust ML models, strategies and algorithms to deal with variant tasks in polymer science are still in rapid growth. The challenges and prospects are then presented. We believe that the innovation in polymer materials will thrive along the development of ML approaches, from efficient design to sustainable applications.
Q1

Metal–Organic Frameworks Coordination‐Oriented Polymer Dielectrics for Neuromorphic Vision Sensors
Zhu D., Du J., Peng Z., Wang J., He X., Li G., Ye L., Ling H., Zhao M., Lin H., Ji D., Hu W.
ABSTRACTInterface engineering based on polymer dielectrics shows great promise in organic field‐effect transistors (OFETs)‐based neuromorphic vision sensors (NeuVS). However, the highly disordered chain arrangement of polymer dielectrics often has a negative impact on the dynamic behavior of charge carriers, thereby affecting the sensing, memory, and computing performance of devices. To this end, we report an effective strategy to improve the orientation of polymer dielectrics by using a coordination combination of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and polymer. As a result, the coordination of MOFs with polymers improves the polarization of hydroxyl (−OH) and the resulting interfacial dipole could achieve an increase of photogenerated carriers in NeuVS with both higher mobility (above 20 cm2/(V ∙ s)) and better optical figures of merit than devices without the coordination of MOFs. Furthermore, the new MOFs‐polymer dielectric gives NeuVS devices temporal dynamics that enable better color extraction in static images. More importantly, in‐sensor perception of moving objects was simulated, allowing postprocessing to produce over 95% action recognition accuracy. This attempt provides a new idea for the development of dielectric materials for highly sensitive light detection and visuomorphic computing.
Q1

Deep Learning‐Assisted Electronic Skin System Capable of Capturing Spatiotemporal and Mechanical Features of Social Touch to Enhance Human–Robot Emotion Recognition
Huang J., Sun Y., Jiang Y., Li J., Sun X., Cao X., Zheng Y., Pan L., Shi Y.
ABSTRACTIn human interactions, social touch communication is widely used to convey emotions, emphasizing its critical role in advancing human–robot interactions by enabling robots to understand and respond to human emotions, thereby significantly enhancing their service capabilities. However, the challenge is to dynamically capture social touch with sufficient spatiotemporal and mechanical resolution for deep haptic data analysis. This study presents a robotic system with flexible electronic skin and a high‐frequency signal circuit, utilizing deep neural networks to recognize social touch emotions. The electronic skin, made from double cross‐linked ionogels and microstructured arrays, has a low force detection threshold (8 Pa) and a wide perception range (0–150 kPa), enhancing the mechanical resolution of touch signals. By incorporating a high‐speed readout circuit capable of capturing spatiotemporal features of social touch gesture information at 30 Hz, the system facilitates precise analysis of touch interactions. A 3D convolutional neural network with a Squeeze‐and‐Excitation Attention module achieves 87.12% accuracy in recognizing social touch gestures, improving the understanding of emotions conveyed through touch. The effectiveness of the system is validated through interactive demonstrations with robotic dogs and humanoid robots, demonstrating its potential to enhance the emotional intelligence of robots.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
Latin American Politics and Society
556 citations, 5%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
423 citations, 3.81%
|
|
Journal of Politics in Latin America
219 citations, 1.97%
|
|
Comparative Political Studies
180 citations, 1.62%
|
|
World Development
125 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Journal of Latin American Studies
118 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Latin American Perspectives
114 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Latin American Research Review
104 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Bulletin of Latin American Research
101 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Democratization
98 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Party Politics
89 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Journal of Politics
75 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Studies in Comparative International Development
75 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Opiniao Publica
70 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Electoral Studies
69 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Political Research Quarterly
60 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Government and Opposition
57 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Latin American Policy
52 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Brazilian Political Science Review
50 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Extractive Industries and Society
47 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Third World Quarterly
46 citations, 0.41%
|
|
American Political Science Review
45 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Review of International Political Economy
42 citations, 0.38%
|
|
American Journal of Political Science
41 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Dados
39 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Legislative Studies Quarterly
37 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Perspectives on Politics
36 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Regional and Federal Studies
36 citations, 0.32%
|
|
World Politics
34 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Political Studies
32 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Policing and Society
32 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional
32 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Colombia Internacional
32 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Governance
31 citations, 0.28%
|
|
International Studies Quarterly
30 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Politics & Gender
30 citations, 0.27%
|
|
British Journal of Political Science
30 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Conflict Resolution
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Revista de Administracao Publica
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Annual Review of Sociology
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Political Science Review
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública
27 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Geoforum
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Development Studies
25 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Globalizations
25 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Crime, Law and Social Change
24 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Contemporary Politics
24 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Social Politics
24 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política
24 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Political Geography
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Peace Research
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Global Social Policy
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Politics Groups and Identities
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Development and Change
22 citations, 0.2%
|
|
The Journal of Legislative Studies
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
New Political Economy
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Publius
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Annual Review of Political Science
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Peasant Studies
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Politics
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Politics and Policy
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Frontiers in Political Science
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Political Studies Review
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Development Policy Review
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Political Behavior
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Social Science Quarterly
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Latin American Religions
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
European Journal of Political Research
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Revista de Sociologia e Politica
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Trends in Organized Crime
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Contexto Internacional
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Social Policy and Administration
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Qualitative Sociology
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Regulation and Governance
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Urban Affairs
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
PLoS ONE
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of International Relations and Development
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Social Policy
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Foreign Policy Analysis
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Public Choice
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
The Geography of Trade Liberalization
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Small Wars and Insurgencies
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Global Crime
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Migration Review
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Cambridge Review of International Affairs
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Migration
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Public Administration and Development
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Policy and Society
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Criminal Justice Review
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Behavioral Scientist
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1655 citations, 14.9%
|
|
Wiley
1408 citations, 12.67%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1270 citations, 11.43%
|
|
SAGE
1128 citations, 10.15%
|
|
Springer Nature
697 citations, 6.27%
|
|
Elsevier
570 citations, 5.13%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
417 citations, 3.75%
|
|
Oxford University Press
326 citations, 2.93%
|
|
Institut fur Iberoamerika-Kunde
193 citations, 1.74%
|
|
SciELO
186 citations, 1.67%
|
|
Emerald
116 citations, 1.04%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
111 citations, 1%
|
|
Centro de Estudos de Opiniao Publica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas
62 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Annual Reviews
62 citations, 0.56%
|
|
MDPI
59 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
42 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Duke University Press
38 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Instituto Universitario de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro
38 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
37 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Instituto Brasileiro de Relacoes Internacionais
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
CAIRN
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
University of Calgary Press
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
OpenEdition
25 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
24 citations, 0.22%
|
|
IGI Global
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Universidad de los Andes
22 citations, 0.2%
|
|
University of California Press
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Brill
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Institut des Hautes Etudes de l'Amerique Latine (IHEAL)
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Facultad de Ciencias Politicas y Sociales, UNAM
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Berghahn Books
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Direito de Sao Paulo
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Federal University of Bahia Human Resources Center
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Bristol University Press
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Center for the Study of the Presidency
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Project MUSE
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Cornell University Press
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Economic Association
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
World Scientific
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Instituto de Pesquisas Economicas
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
MIT Press
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
CEBRAP - Centro Brasileiro de Analise e Planejamento
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
City University of New York
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institut fur Afrika-Kunde
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Florida Gulf Coast University
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
BMJ
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
LSE Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Moscow State Institute of International Relations
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University, School of World Politics
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Index Copernicus
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit, Instituut voor Culturele en Sociale Antropologie, University Of Nijmegen
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOP Publishing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pluto Journals
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Kiel Institute for the World Economy
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Political Studies, Charles University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centro de estudos sociais
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hanyang University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Asian Studies at the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brazilian Administration Review
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Baikal State University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
MGIMO University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Intellect
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
Tulane University
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
16 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Harvard University
13 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Torcuato di Tella University
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Oxford
11 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Cornell University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Brown University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Wake Forest University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Columbia University
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Utah
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Dartmouth College
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Florida
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Georgetown University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Boston University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
American University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Minnesota
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Salamanca
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Temple University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Florida International University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Miami
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Southern California
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Chicago
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Michigan
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Tecnológico de Monterrey
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
York University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Connecticut
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
National University of General San Martín
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Denver
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Texas A&M University
5 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Ege University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Lisbon
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Zurich
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
King's College London
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Iowa State University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Northwestern University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
New York University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Washington
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
San Diego State University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Central Florida
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of South Florida
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Ohio University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Dublin City University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Brigham Young University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Houston
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Portland State University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Bath
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Australian National University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Yale University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
European University Institute
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
George Washington University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Princeton University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Ibero-American University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Dalhousie University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Colorado State University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
West Virginia University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Duke University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Syracuse University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Tufts University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Arizona
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Federal University of Pernambuco
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Texas at El Paso
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Victoria
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Sussex
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Guelph
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Girona
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Delaware
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of the Republic
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Wesleyan University
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
3 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Milan
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Cambridge
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Bergen
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Manchester
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Harvard University
5 publications, 1.67%
|
|
Torcuato di Tella University
5 publications, 1.67%
|
|
Tulane University
5 publications, 1.67%
|
|
Tecnológico de Monterrey
4 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of Miami
4 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of Oxford
3 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 1%
|
|
Wake Forest University
3 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Denver
3 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Utah
3 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Connecticut
3 publications, 1%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Georgetown University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Universidad Andrés Bello
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Buenos Aires
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Minnesota
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Brown University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Salamanca
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Temple University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Girona
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Texas State University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Houston
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of St. Gallen
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Ashoka University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Southampton
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Sichuan International Studies University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Iowa State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
La Trobe University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Boston University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Ibero-American University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
American University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Missouri–Kansas City
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Catholic University of America
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Colorado State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
George Mason University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Syracuse University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Ohio State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Arizona
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Georgia State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Ohio University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Panteion University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Dublin City University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Federal University of Pernambuco
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Namur
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
National University of General San Martín
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
German Institute for Global and Area Studies (Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien)
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Berlin School of Economics and Law
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Justus Liebig University Giessen
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Leiden University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Philipps University of Marburg
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Konstanz
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Purdue University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Groningen
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Hagen
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Technikum Vienna
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Open University of Catalonia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Carolina University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Bucknell University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Comillas Pontifical University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
USA
|
USA, 608, 32.44%
USA
608 publications, 32.44%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 47, 2.51%
Mexico
47 publications, 2.51%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 45, 2.4%
Italy
45 publications, 2.4%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 38, 2.03%
United Kingdom
38 publications, 2.03%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 37, 1.97%
Brazil
37 publications, 1.97%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 35, 1.87%
Canada
35 publications, 1.87%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 35, 1.87%
Chile
35 publications, 1.87%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 29, 1.55%
Argentina
29 publications, 1.55%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 13, 0.69%
Germany
13 publications, 0.69%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 13, 0.69%
Spain
13 publications, 0.69%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 9, 0.48%
Colombia
9 publications, 0.48%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 8, 0.43%
Australia
8 publications, 0.43%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 8, 0.43%
Switzerland
8 publications, 0.43%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 7, 0.37%
Netherlands
7 publications, 0.37%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 7, 0.37%
Uruguay
7 publications, 0.37%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 7, 0.37%
Philippines
7 publications, 0.37%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 6, 0.32%
Norway
6 publications, 0.32%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.27%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.27%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.27%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.27%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 5, 0.27%
Peru
5 publications, 0.27%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 0.27%
Turkey
5 publications, 0.27%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 0.27%
Sweden
5 publications, 0.27%
|
China
|
China, 4, 0.21%
China
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.21%
Greece
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 0.21%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.16%
Austria
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.16%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.11%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.11%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.11%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.11%
Japan
2 publications, 0.11%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.05%
France
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.05%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.05%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.05%
India
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.05%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.05%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.05%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.05%
Finland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.05%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (9 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
|
|
USA
|
USA, 100, 33.33%
USA
100 publications, 33.33%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 13, 4.33%
Brazil
13 publications, 4.33%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 13, 4.33%
Chile
13 publications, 4.33%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 12, 4%
Argentina
12 publications, 4%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 12, 4%
Italy
12 publications, 4%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 12, 4%
Mexico
12 publications, 4%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 10, 3.33%
United Kingdom
10 publications, 3.33%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 2.33%
Spain
7 publications, 2.33%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 6, 2%
Germany
6 publications, 2%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 5, 1.67%
Colombia
5 publications, 1.67%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 1.33%
Canada
4 publications, 1.33%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 1.33%
Netherlands
4 publications, 1.33%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 1%
Peru
3 publications, 1%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 3, 1%
Uruguay
3 publications, 1%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 1%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 1%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 1%
Switzerland
3 publications, 1%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 0.67%
Australia
2 publications, 0.67%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.67%
Austria
2 publications, 0.67%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.67%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.67%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.33%
France
1 publication, 0.33%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.33%
China
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.33%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.33%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.33%
Greece
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.33%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.33%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.33%
India
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.33%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.33%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.33%
Norway
1 publication, 0.33%
|
20
40
60
80
100
|
1 profile journal article
Da Simone
18 publications,
6 citations
h-index: 1