Baranova, Irina Aleksandrovna
PhD in Chemistry
Publications
15
Citations
142
h-index
8
Laboratory of High Energy Chemistry
Researcher
Publications found: 16

Manufacturing sustainable composite building materials: from waste, to the lab, to the community
Agyeman Boateng E., Bilal M., Pandapas C., Singappuli N., Yohay E., Ismael A., Cote D., Krueger R.
Abstract
This paper describes how our team took waste plastic and coconut fibers to create a composite strong enough to be used for roof sheathing in West Africa. Part one details the necessary background and literature review, our research design, and findings from lab work conducted in the summer of 2023. In part two of the paper, we describe a pilot test of reproducing our results outside the lab in a rural Ghanaian community. Through a co-design process, the team worked in a peer-to-peer relationship with community members of Akyem Dwenase in Ghana’s Eastern Region to test the process of transforming waste plastic into roof sheathing using technology designed in Ghana. The project was borne out of a MS project in Science and Technology for Innovation in Global Development and supported by a team of undergraduates who, under the supervision of faculty, worked for seven weeks in Ghana to develop and test the prototype. The paper concludes with areas for future work.

Re-framing and enacting diversity in science education: the case of college chemistry classrooms
Picón R.O.
Abstract
Scholarship about the effectiveness of programs related to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in college suggests that increasing the presence of marginalized students does not necessarily result in producing inclusion and a sense of belonging in science. Recruiting and retaining marginalized students in science-related fields and comparing them with students from dominant groups is assimilationist because the presence of different people does not inherently create a diverse school setting. The central goal of this viewpoint paper is to propose a holistic view of diversity at the university level. Particularly, I discuss a conceptual framework that frames diversity as a process that entails inducing, orchestrating, utilizing, valuing, and honoring the heterogeneity of ways of thinking, doing, and being of individuals to learn. To translate commitments to enact diversity in daily teaching practices, specifically in the chemistry classroom, I analyze culturally relevant pedagogy as a productive tool to encourage students and instructors to develop and leverage a robust repertoire of thoughts, practices, and identities to learn disciplinary concepts and solve problems that matter to students. To support the operationalization of diversity in science classrooms in higher education, researchers and practitioners should identify and value the coexistence of different thoughts, practices, and identities in the school to create a safe and intellectually challenging learning setting where thinking, doing, and being different is an asset toward learning.

Making exploratory search engines using qualitative case studies: a mixed method implementation using interviews with Detroit Artisans
Robinson K.P., Garvin M., Eglash R., Robert L., Guzdial M., Bennett A.
Abstract
Search engine algorithms are increasingly subjects of critique, with evidence indicating their role in driving polarization, exclusion, and algorithmic social harms. Many proposed solutions take a top-down approach, with experts proposing bias-corrections. A more participatory approach may be possible, with those made vulnerable by algorithmic unfairness having a voice in how they want to be “found.” By using a mixed methods approach, we sought to develop search engine criteria from the bottom-up. In this project we worked with a group of 16 African American artisanal entrepreneurs in Detroit Michigan, with a majority female and all from low-income communities. Through regular in-depth interviews with select participants, they highlighted their important services, identities and practices. We then used causal set relations with natural language processing to match queries with their qualitative narratives. We refer to this two-step process-- deliberately focusing on social groups with unaddressed needs, and carefully translating narratives to computationally accessible forms--as a “content aware” approach. The resulting content aware search outcomes place themes that participants value, in particular greater relationality, much earlier in the list of results when compared with a standard Web search. More broadly, our use of participatory design with “content awareness” adds evidence to the importance of addressing algorithmic bias by considering who gets to address it; and, that participatory search engine criteria can be modeled as robust linkages between interviews and semantic similarity using causal set relations.

Imagining just futures through interdisciplinary pedagogies: cultivating communities of practice across the sciences and humanities
York E., May C., Breneman D.L., Yanacek H., Klevickis C., Conley S.N.
Abstract
This case study describes an experimental initiative at James Madison University funded by a National Science Foundation grant in Fall 2021 that aimed to support interdisciplinary collaborative pedagogical development related to Science, Technology, and Society (STS) with a particular focus on ethics and justice. The case study argues that creating infrastructure to cultivate and sustain small teaching communities of practice that include faculty from humanities, social sciences, and STEM fields, can support the challenging and necessary work of developing integrated STS-informed pedagogies across the curriculum. A flexible framework is examined through multiple lenses, including perspectives from each faculty participant, representing teaching departments of Biology, World Languages & Cultures, Integrated Science and Technology/Biotechnology, Justice Studies/Disability Studies, and Integrated Science and Technology/Public Interest Technology and Science. Authors provide key insights about what enables and sustains an interdisciplinary community of practice.

Demystifying artificial intelligence for the global public interest: establishing responsible AI for international development through training
Zarei Ardestani Z., Mao E., Krueger R.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a buzzword around the globe. For many, AI was once contained in high-tech labs and has now been released out into the world for the rest of us to use. Generative AI, which is what Microsoft, Apple, and OpenAI have recently offered, is only one version of AI – probably the one with the most ‘curb appeal’. In fact, AI dates to the 1950s and has offered much more banal – by today’s standards – innovations. This case study represents an effort to demystify popular notions of AI and take a first baby step toward developing AI literacy among international development practitioners. We offer two cases of courses that we developed to build appropriate bridges to the future, to show AI is not like the discovery of fire – a gift from the gods – but rather a technology that is a baby step forward in data analytics.

“The 21st century professionalization?”: online education as an instrument for bolstering individual welfare and societal equality
Huet P.
Abstract
Since the start of the last decade of the 20th century, the application of digital technologies with the potential of making substantial contributions to a community’s welfare have led to the creation of the literature of Public Interest Technologies and reinvigorated many areas of focus in the social sciences. A relevant subfield of this literature has been the application of new technologies to education to increase social public benefits. The traditional literature on higher education seems to agree that the expansion of this good throughout a society is desirable because it generates direct and indirect individual gains, as well as aggregate level social benefits in the form of positive externalities. However, some authors have argued that the acquisition of postsecondary education has its own drawbacks: unwanted intellectual influence of instructors on students, barriers to access for students of historically vulnerable sociodemographic groups, as well as students’ perception of a reduced pay-off from going to college. While there have been some indices that online higher education could abate many of these issues, there has been relatively little formal research to test this tool’s impact. Using a quantitative approach, via cross-section and time-series data analysis, the text finds some evidence that online higher education could solve many of higher education’s drawbacks, while also being a feasible approach given the current technological environment of the United States. The text concludes outlining future research using a mixed-methods approach that could be highly valuable to acquire a more comprehensive view and robust evidence of online higher education’s potential of expanding social public benefits.

Can public interest technology serve people who have disabilities?
Gran B., Bryden A.M.
Abstract
Public Interest Technology is an emerging paradigm, scholarly domain, and potential contributor to reducing barriers, mitigating discrimination, and promoting human rights of people who have disabilities. Employing data from individual interviews of people who have experienced spinal cord injury and their support persons, this project identifies obstacles and barriers these people experience when seeking technologies needed for rehabilitation and reintegration. This article discusses these individuals’ experiences in light of how public interest technology may be a game changer for people who have experienced spinal cord injuries.

Black-oriented EdTech and public interest technology: a framework for accessible and ethically designed technology for K-12 students
Campbell S.E.
Abstract
This study explores the intersection of public interest technology (PIT) and K-12 Black-oriented educational technology (EdTech) platforms in addressing educational inequities and racial biases. Despite the increased adoption of EdTech in K-12 settings, it often perpetuates racial biases, marginalizing Black students. Conversely, Black-oriented educational technology has been established to counter the marginalization of Black students by centering Black culture and realities in educational content (Young, P.A. 1999. Roads to travel: a historical look at African American contributions to instructional technology. University of California, Berkeley), emphasizing principles of ethical, accessible, and impactful technology use aligned with PIT. However, research on these digital platforms is limited. This study employs multimodal critical discourse analysis to examine three K-12 Black-oriented platforms – KaiXR, Reconstruction, and TunTimo – developed by Black women, to understand how they address technology inclusion and counteract racial biases in mainstream EdTech.

Examining generative image models amidst privacy regulations
Ismael H.
Abstract
As diffusion models emerge as a new frontier in generative AI, requiring vast image databases as their inputs, the question arises: how should regulators approach policies concerning the collection and utilization of these images? Though generative image models currently interpret the data they scrape as public, regulatory bodies have yet to confirm this as a viable understanding. This paper explores the current public/personal distinction of data as well as the respective legal standards for both categories in both the American and European context. This paper acts as a guide for regulators seeking to understand monopolization and privacy implications of confirming the validity of using open sourced images versus imagining a reality of curated or licensed datasets amidst outrage from artists over a breach of an expectation of collection/use to their artwork. Though arguments have been made regarding using copyright to protect artists, this paper seeks to explore other pathways for regulating generative image models under our current conceptual frameworks of privacy.

Frontmatter
Journal of Integrated Global STEM
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0


Public interest technology and why it’s important to create an outlet for it?
Journal of Integrated Global STEM
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Quarkume A.Y.


What do college students think about artificial intelligence? We ask them
Cruz Zuniga M., Santrac N., Kwiatkowski A., Abood B.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming different aspects of the economy and society of countries. There are diverse effects when comparing the impact in developed versus developing countries. In the educational sector, efforts to incorporate AI have largely ignored the input from those directly impacted by it. This document presents results from a survey about AI to university students in Latin America. The information presented comes from a survey conducted in November 2023 to college students with ages between 18 and 25 years in four Latin American countries: Mexico, Argentina, Peru, and Ecuador. The results indicate that, in general, youth have a positive view about the potential of AI, though limited knowledge in the topic. Moreover, university students in the region do not want to be passive recipients of AI. They want to participate directly in conversations about this very current topic and have concerns about different aspects of AI implementation in the region. These findings highlight the need for universities, governments, civil society and international organizations and the private sector to work together to create spaces for inclusive dialogue where the youth could directly participate in conversations that crucially matter for their lives.

Towards defining the public interest in technology: lessons from history
Washington A.L., Cheung J.
Abstract
The public interest suggests a singular approach to a social good, but lessons from history illustrate the nuances of sharing open space, transportation networks, and policy mandates. Serving the public exists across a spectrum of possibilities. In this essay, we consider how the emerging field of public interest technology could learn from previous assumptions about who counts as the public and how benefits or harms can be overly concentrated in certain populations. We situate public interest technology as a growing capability of government public service, an institutionalized professional practice like public interest law, as well as a site of critical inquiry. Our definition of the public interest is motivated by a theory of change that recognizes the strength of inclusion. Punctuated with historic and contemporary examples, this essay argues that by acknowledging conflicts of interest and embracing the marginal, public interest technology could build ethical infrastructures to serve all.

Environmental effects of plastic pollution and sustainability: where are we now?
Journal of Integrated Global STEM
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
Barrick A., Hoang T.


Trust and Safety work: internal governance of technology risks and harms
Shulruff T.
Abstract
Trust and Safety work mitigates certain social risks and harms of digital technologies. In a landscape that is only slowly establishing regulatory oversight mechanisms, Trust and Safety work performs a type of internal governance by attempting to mitigate disinformation, online harassment, extremism, and other harms accelerated or amplified by technology products and services. With origins in content moderation, Trust and Safety work now also includes product advice for online services and IRL (in real life) products. Attention to Trust and Safety work can complicate a monolithic view of what tech work is and who does it, as well as point to locations for intervention as we seek to promote Public Interest Technology in globally impactful sociotechnical systems.
Found
Total publications
15
Total citations
142
Citations per publication
9.47
Average publications per year
0.41
Average coauthors
4.73
Publications years
1988-2024 (37 years)
h-index
8
i10-index
7
m-index
0.22
o-index
15
g-index
11
w-index
2
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
i10-index
The number of the author's publications that received at least 10 links each.
m-index
The researcher's m-index is numerically equal to the ratio of his h-index to the number of years that have passed since the first publication.
o-index
The geometric mean of the h-index and the number of citations of the most cited article of the scientist.
g-index
For a given set of articles, sorted in descending order of the number of citations that these articles received, the g-index is the largest number such that the g most cited articles received (in total) at least g2 citations.
w-index
If w articles of a researcher have at least 10w citations each and other publications are less than 10(w+1) citations, then the researcher's w-index is equal to w.
Top-100
Fields of science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 8, 53.33%
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
8 publications, 53.33%
|
General Physics and Astronomy
|
General Physics and Astronomy, 3, 20%
General Physics and Astronomy
3 publications, 20%
|
Radiation
|
Radiation, 3, 20%
Radiation
3 publications, 20%
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 2, 13.33%
General Chemistry
2 publications, 13.33%
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 1, 6.67%
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
1 publication, 6.67%
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 1, 6.67%
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
1 publication, 6.67%
|
Spectroscopy
|
Spectroscopy, 1, 6.67%
Spectroscopy
1 publication, 6.67%
|
Analytical Chemistry
|
Analytical Chemistry, 1, 6.67%
Analytical Chemistry
1 publication, 6.67%
|
General Energy
|
General Energy, 1, 6.67%
General Energy
1 publication, 6.67%
|
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
|
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 1, 6.67%
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
1 publication, 6.67%
|
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
|
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 1, 6.67%
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
1 publication, 6.67%
|
Pollution
|
Pollution, 1, 6.67%
Pollution
1 publication, 6.67%
|
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
|
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, 1, 6.67%
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
1 publication, 6.67%
|
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
|
Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 1, 6.67%
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
1 publication, 6.67%
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Journals
1
2
3
4
|
|
High Energy Chemistry
4 publications, 26.67%
|
|
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
4 publications, 26.67%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
2 publications, 13.33%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
Russian Chemical Bulletin
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
Citing journals
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
19 citations, 13.38%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
15 citations, 10.56%
|
|
High Energy Chemistry
9 citations, 6.34%
|
|
Vibronic Interactions and the Jahn-Teller Effect
7 citations, 4.93%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
6 citations, 4.23%
|
|
Russian Chemical Bulletin
6 citations, 4.23%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
6 citations, 4.23%
|
|
Moscow University Chemistry Bulletin
5 citations, 3.52%
|
|
Journal not defined
|
Journal not defined, 4, 2.82%
Journal not defined
4 citations, 2.82%
|
Israel Journal of Chemistry
4 citations, 2.82%
|
|
Journal of Computational Chemistry
3 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Low Temperature Physics
3 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
3 citations, 2.11%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
3 citations, 2.11%
|
|
ChemPhysChem
3 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Pharmaceutics
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Chemical Physics Letters
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
ChemistrySelect
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Polymers
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Lomonosov chemistry journal
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Nanomedicine and Nanotoxicology
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Journal of Sulfur Chemistry
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Polymer Science - Series B
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
RSC Advances
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Physical Review Letters
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
ACS Nano
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Nanomaterials
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Physikalische Chemie
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Polymer Degradation and Stability
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Applied Organometallic Chemistry
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Particle and Particle Systems Characterization
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Russian Journal of General Chemistry
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Nanomedicine
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Atoms
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Coatings
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Annual Reports Section A (Inorganic Chemistry)
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Optics and Photonics Journal
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Show all (23 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
Publishers
1
2
3
4
|
|
Elsevier
4 publications, 26.67%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
4 publications, 26.67%
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 13.33%
|
|
AIP Publishing
2 publications, 13.33%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
Organizations from articles
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
12 publications, 80%
|
|
Enikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 publications, 26.67%
|
|
Federal Medical Biophysical Center named after A.I. Burnazyan
3 publications, 20%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 2, 13.33%
Organization not defined
2 publications, 13.33%
|
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
A.N.Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
ITMO University
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Countries from articles
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 13, 86.67%
Russia
13 publications, 86.67%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 5, 33.33%
Country not defined
5 publications, 33.33%
|
USA
|
USA, 1, 6.67%
USA
1 publication, 6.67%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 6.67%
Israel
1 publication, 6.67%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 1, 6.67%
USSR
1 publication, 6.67%
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Citing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
57 citations, 40.14%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 18, 12.68%
Organization not defined
18 citations, 12.68%
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
17 citations, 11.97%
|
|
Enikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials of the Russian Academy of Sciences
10 citations, 7.04%
|
|
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 3.52%
|
|
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 2.82%
|
|
Federal Medical Biophysical Center named after A.I. Burnazyan
4 citations, 2.82%
|
|
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
3 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Jilin University
3 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
A.E. Favorsky Irkutsk Institute of Chemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Siberian Federal University
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Karpov Institute of Physical Chemistry
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Gause Institute of New Antibiotics
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Nanjing Tech University
2 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
A.N.Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
N.N. Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
ITMO University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Novosibirsk State University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Federal Research Center of Problem of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry RAS
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Ural State Agrarian University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Shahid Beheshti University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Jammu
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Baghdad
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Wasit
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Islamic University of Najaf
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Arak University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Al Mustaqbal University College
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Thi-Qar
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Hakim Sabzevari University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Peking University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Ghent University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Hebei North University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
East China Normal University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Liverpool
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Southern University of Science and Technology
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Guangdong Medical University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Southwest Jiaotong University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Kaohsiung Medical University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Columbia University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Kunming University of Science and Technology
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Kunming Medical University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Eötvös Loránd University (University of Budapest)
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Universidad Andrés Bello
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Waterloo
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Philipps University of Marburg
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Bremen
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Institute for Molecular Science
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Temple University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Coimbra
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Warsaw
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Alberta
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Alabama
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of York
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Cape Breton University
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
University of Kragujevac
1 citation, 0.7%
|
|
Show all (54 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Citing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 69, 48.59%
Russia
69 citations, 48.59%
|
India
|
India, 23, 16.2%
India
23 citations, 16.2%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 14, 9.86%
Country not defined
14 citations, 9.86%
|
China
|
China, 13, 9.15%
China
13 citations, 9.15%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 10, 7.04%
Mexico
10 citations, 7.04%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 4, 2.82%
Germany
4 citations, 2.82%
|
USA
|
USA, 4, 2.82%
USA
4 citations, 2.82%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 2.82%
Iran
4 citations, 2.82%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 2.11%
Canada
3 citations, 2.11%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 2, 1.41%
Azerbaijan
2 citations, 1.41%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 1.41%
Brazil
2 citations, 1.41%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 2, 1.41%
United Kingdom
2 citations, 1.41%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 1.41%
Pakistan
2 citations, 1.41%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 1.41%
Turkey
2 citations, 1.41%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.7%
France
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.7%
Ukraine
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.7%
Portugal
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.7%
Belgium
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.7%
Hungary
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.7%
Iraq
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.7%
Spain
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.7%
Colombia
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.7%
Poland
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.7%
Romania
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.7%
Serbia
1 citation, 0.7%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.7%
Chile
1 citation, 0.7%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
This section displays the profiles of scientists registered on the platform. To display the full list, invite your colleagues to register.