Grabovskiy, Stanislav A
PhD in Chemistry, Associate Professor
🥼
🥼
Stanislav can become your supervisor
If you would like to work under his/her guidance, please write a message or contact him/her on social media.
Authorization required.
Please confirm your email.
Thanks for signing up! Before getting started, could you verify your email address by clicking on the link we just emailed to you? If you didn't receive the email, we will gladly send you another.
🤝
🤝
Stanislav is looking for opportunities for scientific collaboration
If you would like to do joint research with him/her, write a message or contact him/her on social media.
Authorization required.
Please confirm your email.
Thanks for signing up! Before getting started, could you verify your email address by clicking on the link we just emailed to you? If you didn't receive the email, we will gladly send you another.
Publications
69
Citations
344
h-index
11
Education
Bashkir State University
1992 — 1996,
Master, Chemical
Publications found: 15013
New Feature to the Radar System to Enhance ATCO Performance and Situation Awareness on Radar Display
Rostom M.G., Dattel A.R., Taleisnik S.E.
An experiment was conducted using a simulation software similar to the radar system with a new feature that makes the aircraft flight number blink on the radar display each time a pilot presses the radio button to talk. Eighteen participants volunteered. In the first scenario, the flashing feature was turned “OFF.” In the second scenario, the flashing feature was turned “ON.” Each participant was tested on three occasions. The first occasion was the “stuck-microphone” situation, the second was similarity in call-sign situation, the third was simultaneous transmission of voice communication from two or more flights on the radio that distorted the modulation. Participants identified significantly more aircraft when the flashing feature was active compared to when it was inactive. Consequently, it is anticipated that this flashing feature will likely reduce verbal communication between pilots and controllers, thereby improving overall controller performance and maintaining safe airspace operation.
Computer Vision Embedded Post-Processing Algorithm on Lifting Risks
Liu P., Chen H., Yu D.
This research aims to enhance ergonomic assessments by integrating computer vision algorithms with NIOSH lifting index parameters (HM, VM, DM, AM). Current methods are manual and subjective, lacking real-time analysis. Utilizing the coordinates of 17 body joint points, our algorithm automates this process, improving the precision, objectivity, and timeliness of ergonomic evaluations.
Distributed Space Team Coordination: An Agent-based Modeling and Simulation Approach
Yin X., Gorman J.C.
Space missions present unique challenges for teams, requiring effective communication, coordination, and cooperation under stress and physical strain. As humans venture further into space, communication latency becomes a significant challenge, with delays ranging from seconds to minutes. This latency affects team performance and cognitive load, whether the team consists of humans, machines, or both. Shared mental models can help manage these delays, but the lack of “shared context” due to varied physical environments can impede their development. Extensive astronaut training, lasting 5 to 10 years, makes realistic simulation of space tasks challenging for study participants. Using an Agent-Based Model (ABM) and a scenario built from interviews with Subject Matter Experts (SMEs), this study simulates complex interactions and coordination challenges in space teaming, addressing the complexities and dynamic nature of space missions.
Public Health Decision-Making Using Uncertainty Displays
Tessema T., Vasquez H., Rosella L., Donmez B.
High rates of chronic disease have created challenges for public health decision-makers in resource allocation. Decision tools designed to support public health professionals can help address these challenges. This study aims to investigate the impact of different uncertainty visualization techniques on user perceptions. The study was designed for the purpose of supporting the development of CDPoRT, a chronic disease risk prediction tool. Participants performed a fictional recourse allocation decision-making task with map-based visualizations, tables with and without uncertainty data, and a table with uncertainty explanation. The findings show that CDPoRT’s user interface may benefit from the inclusion of an overlay map to visualize the rate and uncertainty information for public health resource allocation decisions. Future research can consider the development of interactive features to facilitate comparisons between multiple geographical regions and simulate interventions.
Using Human-Centered Design to Decrease the Risk of Toileting in Hospitals for Patients and Clinicians
O’Neill K., Doran M., Davie K., Andreano A., Tulk Jesso S.
Patient falls are common injuries in hospitals, and many occur surrounding a patient’s need to use the bathroom. In this study, we used the TripTech Method to design and evaluate early-stage design concepts for fall prevention and reduction of occupational injury associated with toileting falls. Nurse participants saw an opportunity in getting their patients to engage in their own recovery in increase the potential for cooperation, and also desired tools which could make the process physically easier for staff and patients which were also accessible when needed. Participants also discussed concerns about higher-tech tools, including affordability issues which could lead to further healthcare disparity. Overall, our research demonstrates how human-centered methods are valuable in focusing design efforts on the most pressing challenges experienced by users to avoid wasted investment in ineffective or unwanted technology.
Ethical Considerations for Autonomous Vehicle Behavior: Approach and Framework
Conway D., Degani A., Dogan E., Hofvenschiold E., Little J., Palade P.
The deployment of autonomous vehicles will demand consistent and agreed-upon behavior in the form of standard driving rules for maneuvers (e.g., lane changes) as well as defined responses to specific road situations such as giving way to emergency vehicles and when crashes are unavoidable. This paper provides an approach to the implementation of ethical considerations for highly automated vehicles and autonomous vehicles by suggesting standard driving rules and a framework for the generation and evaluation of these rules. This framework is generic and can instantiate any set of ethical concepts (e.g., Western or Eastern schools of ethics) and cultural norms (e.g., European, Latin American, Asian) and be applied to other technological domains such as robot ethics and AI ethics.
Does Augmenting Virtual Reality-Based Cognitive Training with Longitudinal, Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Visual Search Performance? A Neurobehavioral Evaluation
Rao A.K., Bhat K.R., Negi R., Bhavsar A., Dutt V.
This study investigated the effectiveness of combining Virtual Reality (VR)-based cognitive training with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in enhancing visual processing. Eighty participants undertook a 20-day, single-blind, placebo-controlled study across pre-intervention (Day 1), intervention (Day 2–Day 9), and post-intervention phases (Day 10 and Day 20). Participants were randomly assigned to four groups: tDCS + VR, VR + placebo tDCS, tDCS + placebo VR, and placebo tDCS + placebo VR. After undertaking three visual processing tasks on Day 1, participants underwent intervention from Day 2 to Day 9 and followed up with post-intervention testing on Days 10 and 20. Results revealed that the tDCS + VR condition showed significantly improved sensitivity in visual search on Day 10. EEG results indicated that anodal tDCS coupled with VR training enhanced cortical activation in the tDCS + VR condition. This study underscores the potential of cognitive training programs integrating VR and tDCS.
Validating Measures of Team Reorganization and Interdependency in Response to Uncertainty in an Air Battle Management Task
Grimm D.A., Gorman J.C., Funke G.J., Tolston M.T.
Teams working in complex, high-stakes environments may encounter uncertain situations for which they are not trained and can suffer dangerous consequences if they fail to overcome such uncertainty. We focus on how reorganization and dynamic interdependency across communications and air battle management (ABM) assets in response to uncertainty can be quantified in dynamic task environments. We analyzed data from a 5-day experiment conducted in an ABM task scenario to validate metrics of team reorganization and dynamic interdependency. Interactions quantifying reorganization and interdependency across technological task components significantly predicted team performance and higher interdependency of team communications also predicted better performance. Our findings indicate that reorganization and interdependency, primarily across technological assets, may be valid predictors of team effectiveness. Practical implications of this work primarily relate to assisting teams to achieve adaptive team-level proficiencies to uncertainty-inducing perturbations by providing objective feedback on reorganization and interdependency during team training.
An Analysis of Detectability of Vulnerable Road Users Using Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory
Yang W., Matsubayashi S., Miwa K., Kitayama S., Otsuka M., Hamada K.
It is important that advanced driver assistance systems provide drivers with alarms at the time when the driver fails to detect vulnerable road users (VRUs). In this study, we employed the paradigm which was developed by Yang et al. to analyze the detectability of VRUs at the intersection. Nine VRUs were involved, including pedestrians, cyclists, and motorbikes in the same direction as the driver, in the opposite and orthogonal direction to the driver. As the results, the detectability of pedestrians and motorbikes were lower than the detectability of cyclists. On the other hand, the detectability of VRUs in the same direction as the driver was lower than the detectability of VRUs in other directions.
Naturalistic Observations of Human Driving Perceptions and Vehicle Kinematics at Stop Sign-Controlled Intersections
Figueroa Jacinto R., Kappler E., Petroskey K., Arndt S., Leipold T.
Understanding the human factors of how drivers perceive hazards and behave at stop sign-controlled intersections is essential for developing effective roadway features. This study aimed to evaluate the naturalistic behaviors of drivers at stop sign-controlled intersections and to assess the speeds at which drivers maneuvered through stop signs when no cross-traffic was present. To this end, 62 vehicles were analyzed in two, two-lane, four-way roadway intersections in Michigan. Results of this study indicate that most drivers slow to non-zero minimum speeds before traveling through an intersection and measurably encroach beyond stop lines. Assessment of lines of sight and visual obstructions at the subject intersections indicate that drivers’ perceptions of risk, evaluation of potential hazards, and cost of compliance ultimately impact behavior, as seen through vehicle kinematics.
A Tale of Two Simulators—A Comparative Human-in-the-Loop Nuclear Power Plant Operations Study on Thermal Power Dispatch for Hydrogen Production
Ulrich T.A., Lew R., Kim J., Jurski D., Gideon O., Dickerson K., DuBois Z., Boring R.L.
A study was designed for a reconfigurable, full-scale, full-scope nuclear power plant control room simulator to compare two different thermal power dispatch systems, on separate simulator platforms, demonstrating a TPD concept of operation. A TPD system can provide a desirable alternative revenue source for utilities but requires addressing new and unique operational issues. The selection of representative scenarios and the scenario-based experimental design are presented as key elements to capture evidence for validating the developed TPD concept of operations overcome these operational issues.
Graphical Features & Perceptions of Reliability
Sullivan V., Atchley J.A., Vangsness L., Tenhundfeld N.L.
This study examines the impact of graphical features on perceived reliability and user trust in automated systems. Participants viewed 60 static graphs showing system reliability over time, with variables such as maximum reliability, minimum reliability, average reliability, cumulative probability of success/failure, and slope. Each graph was presented with different success or failure rates. Participants rated the system’s reliability, predicted success rates, and willingness to rely on the system. Analysis revealed that perceived reliability was most influenced by minimum reliability when success was depicted and maximum reliability when failure was depicted. These findings suggest that user perceptions of reliability are complex and not solely dependent on the expected features of system performance, indicating a need for further research into the relationship between graphical representations and perceived reliability.
Impact of Upper-Body Motor Function on Verbal Free Recall
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Smith S.L., Johnson C.
Design, Development, and Validation of a Military Orientated Re-configurable Cognitive Task Battery
Sabine G., Thompson D.J.
The United Kingdom’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) has developed an innovative military cognitive task battery tool titled: Interactive Measures of Performance and Assessment of Cognitive Tasks (IMPACT). The purpose of the tool is to support the objective assessment of cognitive task performance and task demand across a range of military system types, use cases and experimental settings. IMPACT consists of six, reconfigurable, generic military tasks, and an intuitive user interface for the experimenter to configure the tool and collect data. Initial validation of the IMPACT tool has been undertaken and a number of early adopters have used the tool to support trials, system development and experimentation. The validation results show that the six individual IMPACT tasks broadly stimulate the associated cognitive attributes; as mapped and originally conceived during the design and development of the tool; as measured by subjective assessment techniques, psychophysiological monitoring, and performance measures. IMPACT continues to be refined in response to feedback from the validation exercise and early adopters of the tool.
Modeling Sensor-based Vigilance Decrement in the Healthcare Environment
Li J., Kettel V., Higgins E.A., Xiao C., Kwon Y., Meno M., Roach V.A., Kim J.
Vigilance refers to an individual’s ability to maintain attention over time. Vigilance decrement is particularly concerning in clinical environments where shift work and long working hours are common. This study identifies significant factors and indicators for predicting and monitoring individuals’ vigilance decrement. We enrolled 11 participants and measured their vigilance levels by recording their reaction times while completing the Psychomotor Vigilance Test. Additionally, we measured participants’ physiological responses and collected their sleep deprivation data, demographic information, and self-reported anxiety levels. Using repeated-measures correlation analysis, we found that decreased vigilance levels, indicated by longer reaction times, were associated with higher electrodermal activity ( p < .01), lower skin temperature ( p < .001), shorter fixation durations ( p < .05), and increased saccade frequency ( p < .05). Moreover, sleep deprivation significantly affected vigilance decrement ( p < .001). Our findings provide the potential to develop a predictive model of vigilance decrements using physiological signals collected from non-intrusive devices, as an alternative to current behavior-based methods.
Found
Total publications
69
Total citations
344
Citations per publication
4.99
Average publications per year
2.38
Average coauthors
3.86
Publications years
1997-2025 (29 years)
h-index
11
i10-index
12
m-index
0.38
o-index
16
g-index
14
w-index
2
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
i10-index
The number of the author's publications that received at least 10 links each.
m-index
The researcher's m-index is numerically equal to the ratio of his h-index to the number of years that have passed since the first publication.
o-index
The geometric mean of the h-index and the number of citations of the most cited article of the scientist.
g-index
For a given set of articles, sorted in descending order of the number of citations that these articles received, the g-index is the largest number such that the g most cited articles received (in total) at least g2 citations.
w-index
If w articles of a researcher have at least 10w citations each and other publications are less than 10(w+1) citations, then the researcher's w-index is equal to w.
Top-100
Fields of science
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 40, 57.97%
General Chemistry
40 publications, 57.97%
|
Organic Chemistry
|
Organic Chemistry, 19, 27.54%
Organic Chemistry
19 publications, 27.54%
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 11, 15.94%
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
11 publications, 15.94%
|
Catalysis
|
Catalysis, 9, 13.04%
Catalysis
9 publications, 13.04%
|
Biochemistry
|
Biochemistry, 9, 13.04%
Biochemistry
9 publications, 13.04%
|
Drug Discovery
|
Drug Discovery, 5, 7.25%
Drug Discovery
5 publications, 7.25%
|
Computer Science Applications
|
Computer Science Applications, 5, 7.25%
Computer Science Applications
5 publications, 7.25%
|
Modeling and Simulation
|
Modeling and Simulation, 5, 7.25%
Modeling and Simulation
5 publications, 7.25%
|
Inorganic Chemistry
|
Inorganic Chemistry, 3, 4.35%
Inorganic Chemistry
3 publications, 4.35%
|
Pharmaceutical Science
|
Pharmaceutical Science, 2, 2.9%
Pharmaceutical Science
2 publications, 2.9%
|
General Chemical Engineering
|
General Chemical Engineering, 2, 2.9%
General Chemical Engineering
2 publications, 2.9%
|
Materials Chemistry
|
Materials Chemistry, 1, 1.45%
Materials Chemistry
1 publication, 1.45%
|
General Medicine
|
General Medicine, 1, 1.45%
General Medicine
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Pharmacology
|
Pharmacology, 1, 1.45%
Pharmacology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Molecular Medicine
|
Molecular Medicine, 1, 1.45%
Molecular Medicine
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Complementary and alternative medicine
|
Complementary and alternative medicine, 1, 1.45%
Complementary and alternative medicine
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Pharmacy
|
Pharmacy, 1, 1.45%
Pharmacy
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Geochemistry and Petrology
|
Geochemistry and Petrology, 1, 1.45%
Geochemistry and Petrology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
|
Energy Engineering and Power Technology, 1, 1.45%
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Fuel Technology
|
Fuel Technology, 1, 1.45%
Fuel Technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
|
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 1, 1.45%
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
|
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health, 1, 1.45%
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Toxicology
|
Toxicology, 1, 1.45%
Toxicology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Journals
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
Russian Chemical Bulletin
16 publications, 23.19%
|
|
Russian Journal of General Chemistry
15 publications, 21.74%
|
|
Kinetics and Catalysis
5 publications, 7.25%
|
|
Current Organic Chemistry
4 publications, 5.8%
|
|
Letters in Organic Chemistry
3 publications, 4.35%
|
|
Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
High Energy Chemistry
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Helvetica Chimica Acta
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Organometallics
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Organic Letters
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Tetrahedron
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Russian Journal of Organic Chemistry
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Chemical Research in Toxicology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Tetrahedron Letters
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacognosy Research
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Letters in Drug Design and Discovery
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Journal of Organic Chemistry
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Synlett
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Synthesis
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Journal of Structural Chemistry
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Petroleum Chemistry
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Current Organic Synthesis
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Citing journals
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
Russian Journal of General Chemistry
38 citations, 11.01%
|
|
Russian Chemical Bulletin
32 citations, 9.28%
|
|
Journal not defined
|
Journal not defined, 26, 7.54%
Journal not defined
26 citations, 7.54%
|
Kinetics and Catalysis
24 citations, 6.96%
|
|
Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
9 citations, 2.61%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
8 citations, 2.32%
|
|
Russian Journal of Organic Chemistry
6 citations, 1.74%
|
|
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A
6 citations, 1.74%
|
|
Organic Letters
5 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
5 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
5 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Journal of Applied Spectroscopy
5 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Tetrahedron Letters
4 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Journal of Organic Chemistry
4 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
4 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry
4 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds
4 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Журнал органической химии
4 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Catalysts
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Chemical Research in Toxicology
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Synlett
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Synthesis
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Progress in Polymer Science
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
ChemChemTech
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Synthetic Communications
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Molecules
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Tetrahedron
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Heterocyclic Communications
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Chemical Physics Letters
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Ozone: Science and Engineering
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
ChemistrySelect
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Chemistry - An Asian Journal
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Chemistry of Natural Compounds
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Applied Catalysis A: General
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Biomolecules
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
High Energy Chemistry
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Progress in Heterocyclic Chemistry
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
European Polymer Journal
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
ChemInform
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Annual Reports Section B (Organic Chemistry)
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Журнал физической химии
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Organic Reaction Mechanisms
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Crystallography
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Inorganica Chimica Acta
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Bioenergetics
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
RSC Advances
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Transactions of Tianjin University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Organic Chemistry Frontiers
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Food Microbiology
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Bioorganic Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Research
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
ACS Catalysis
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Chemistry Letters
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
ChemSusChem
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Science
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Animals
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography A
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Chemical Communications
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Chemical Kinetics
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Organic Process Research and Development
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Computational and Theoretical Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Solid State Ionics
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Functional Foods
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Structural Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Structural Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Science China Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Microchemical Journal
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Surface Review and Letters
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Current Organic Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Antioxidants
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Analytical Chemistry
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishers
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
26 publications, 37.68%
|
|
Springer Nature
18 publications, 26.09%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
9 publications, 13.04%
|
|
Elsevier
4 publications, 5.8%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 publications, 5.8%
|
|
Wiley
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Asociacion Academica de Ciencias Farmaceuticas de Antofagasta (ASOCIFA)
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Organizations from articles
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Ufa Institute of Chemistry of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
60 publications, 86.96%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 7, 10.14%
Organization not defined
7 publications, 10.14%
|
A.N.Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 4.35%
|
|
Togliatti State University
3 publications, 4.35%
|
|
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
N.N. Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
ITMO University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Kazan State Medical University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Siberian Federal Scientific Center for Agrobiotechnology of Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Ufa University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Countries from articles
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 61, 88.41%
Russia
61 publications, 88.41%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 7, 10.14%
Country not defined
7 publications, 10.14%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 7.25%
Italy
5 publications, 7.25%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 4.35%
Canada
3 publications, 4.35%
|
France
|
France, 1, 1.45%
France
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 1.45%
Finland
1 publication, 1.45%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Citing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Ufa Institute of Chemistry of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
66 citations, 19.19%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 65, 18.9%
Organization not defined
65 citations, 18.9%
|
Ufa University of Science and Technology
9 citations, 2.62%
|
|
University of Bologna
9 citations, 2.62%
|
|
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
7 citations, 2.03%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
6 citations, 1.74%
|
|
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
5 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Togliatti State University
5 citations, 1.45%
|
|
A.N.Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 1.16%
|
|
All-Russian Science Research Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
4 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Bonch-Bruevich Saint-Petersburg State University of Telecommunications
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
3 citations, 0.87%
|
|
A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis RAS
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Institute of Physiologically Active Compounds of the Russian Academy of Science
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
G.A. Krestov Institute of Solution Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Ural Federal University
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
T. F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Kazan State Medical University
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Siberian Federal Scientific Center for Agrobiotechnology of Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Library for Natural Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Tsinghua University
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Donghua University
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Qingdao University of Science and Technology
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
University of Queensland
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
University of Alberta
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
University of Ottawa
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
University of York
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
2 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Enikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Postovsky Institute of Organic Synthesis of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Institute of Chemistry Komi SC of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
ITMO University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Southern Federal University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Kazan National Research Technological University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
MIREA — Russian Technological University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Volgograd State Technical University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Federal Research Center of Problem of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry RAS
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Central Research Institute of Structural Materials Prometey of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
M. Akmullah Bashkir State Pedagogical University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
University of Jeddah
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Isfahan University of Technology
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Punjab Agricultural University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Central Drug Research Institute
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Peking University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Tongji University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
University of Malaya
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
University of Burdwan
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Central South University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Fuzhou University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Nanjing Tech University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Nanjing University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Bannari Amman Institute of Technology
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
University of Nantes
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
University of Bern
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Australian National University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Northeastern University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Shaanxi Normal University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
East China Normal University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Henan Normal University
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
American University of Beirut
1 citation, 0.29%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Citing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 111, 32.27%
Russia
111 citations, 32.27%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 34, 9.88%
Country not defined
34 citations, 9.88%
|
China
|
China, 31, 9.01%
China
31 citations, 9.01%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 27, 7.85%
Italy
27 citations, 7.85%
|
USA
|
USA, 13, 3.78%
USA
13 citations, 3.78%
|
France
|
France, 10, 2.91%
France
10 citations, 2.91%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 9, 2.62%
Canada
9 citations, 2.62%
|
India
|
India, 8, 2.33%
India
8 citations, 2.33%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 6, 1.74%
Germany
6 citations, 1.74%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 5, 1.45%
Spain
5 citations, 1.45%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 1.45%
Japan
5 citations, 1.45%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 4, 1.16%
Australia
4 citations, 1.16%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.87%
Belgium
3 citations, 0.87%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 3, 0.87%
Bulgaria
3 citations, 0.87%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 3, 0.87%
United Kingdom
3 citations, 0.87%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.87%
Denmark
3 citations, 0.87%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.87%
Poland
3 citations, 0.87%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.87%
Republic of Korea
3 citations, 0.87%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.87%
Saudi Arabia
3 citations, 0.87%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 0.87%
Finland
3 citations, 0.87%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.58%
Greece
2 citations, 0.58%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.58%
Egypt
2 citations, 0.58%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.58%
Malaysia
2 citations, 0.58%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.58%
Chile
2 citations, 0.58%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.58%
Switzerland
2 citations, 0.58%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.29%
Ukraine
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.29%
Belarus
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.29%
Argentina
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.29%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.29%
Brazil
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.29%
Iran
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.29%
Ireland
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.29%
Lebanon
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.29%
Morocco
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 1, 0.29%
Moldova
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.29%
Norway
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.29%
Pakistan
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.29%
Puerto Rico
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.29%
Rwanda
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.29%
Slovenia
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.29%
Croatia
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.29%
Sweden
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.29%
Ecuador
1 citation, 0.29%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.29%
South Africa
1 citation, 0.29%
|
Show all (14 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
This section displays the profiles of scientists registered on the platform. To display the full list, invite your colleagues to register.
Юрий Ильич Муринов, Наталья Нурулловна Кабальнова, Станислав Анатольевич Грабовский, Иван Сергеевич Рагинов, Ленар Рашитович Валиуллин, Владислав Иванович Егоров
RU2677327C1,
2019
Company/Organization
Position
Senior researcher
Employment type
Full time
Years
2001 —
present