volume 27 issue 3 pages 221-234

Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments

G. Madhavi Sastry 1
Matvey Adzhigirey 2
Tyler Day 2
Ramakrishna Annabhimoju 1
Woody Sherman 2
1
 
Schrödinger, Hyderabad, India
2
 
Schrödinger, New York, USA
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2013-03-01
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.576
CiteScore7.0
Impact factor3.1
ISSN0920654X, 15734951
Drug Discovery
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Computer Science Applications
Abstract
Structure-based virtual screening plays an important role in drug discovery and complements other screening approaches. In general, protein crystal structures are prepared prior to docking in order to add hydrogen atoms, optimize hydrogen bonds, remove atomic clashes, and perform other operations that are not part of the x-ray crystal structure refinement process. In addition, ligands must be prepared to create 3-dimensional geometries, assign proper bond orders, and generate accessible tautomer and ionization states prior to virtual screening. While the prerequisite for proper system preparation is generally accepted in the field, an extensive study of the preparation steps and their effect on virtual screening enrichments has not been performed. In this work, we systematically explore each of the steps involved in preparing a system for virtual screening. We first explore a large number of parameters using the Glide validation set of 36 crystal structures and 1,000 decoys. We then apply a subset of protocols to the DUD database. We show that database enrichment is improved with proper preparation and that neglecting certain steps of the preparation process produces a systematic degradation in enrichments, which can be large for some targets. We provide examples illustrating the structural changes introduced by the preparation that impact database enrichment. While the work presented here was performed with the Protein Preparation Wizard and Glide, the insights and guidance are expected to be generalizable to structure-based virtual screening with other docking methods.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
327 publications, 6.39%
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
191 publications, 3.73%
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
176 publications, 3.44%
Molecules
156 publications, 3.05%
Scientific Reports
138 publications, 2.7%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
129 publications, 2.52%
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
129 publications, 2.52%
Bioorganic Chemistry
86 publications, 1.68%
Journal of Molecular Structure
81 publications, 1.58%
ACS Omega
73 publications, 1.43%
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
69 publications, 1.35%
Molecular Diversity
63 publications, 1.23%
PLoS ONE
61 publications, 1.19%
Nature Communications
59 publications, 1.15%
ChemMedChem
58 publications, 1.13%
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
55 publications, 1.07%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
53 publications, 1.04%
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
52 publications, 1.02%
Computational Biology and Chemistry
49 publications, 0.96%
ChemistrySelect
43 publications, 0.84%
Pharmaceuticals
43 publications, 0.84%
Chemistry and Biodiversity
41 publications, 0.8%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
39 publications, 0.76%
Journal of Biological Chemistry
38 publications, 0.74%
RSC Advances
37 publications, 0.72%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
37 publications, 0.72%
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
37 publications, 0.72%
Computers in Biology and Medicine
36 publications, 0.7%
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
36 publications, 0.7%
50
100
150
200
250
300
350

Publishers

200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Elsevier
1165 publications, 22.77%
Springer Nature
790 publications, 15.44%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
671 publications, 13.11%
MDPI
501 publications, 9.79%
Taylor & Francis
475 publications, 9.28%
Wiley
449 publications, 8.77%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
213 publications, 4.16%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
135 publications, 2.64%
Frontiers Media S.A.
129 publications, 2.52%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
77 publications, 1.5%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
67 publications, 1.31%
Oxford University Press
39 publications, 0.76%
American Society for Microbiology
28 publications, 0.55%
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
27 publications, 0.53%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
25 publications, 0.49%
Hindawi Limited
20 publications, 0.39%
F1000 Research
17 publications, 0.33%
King Saud University
17 publications, 0.33%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
15 publications, 0.29%
World Scientific
14 publications, 0.27%
Research Square Platform LLC
14 publications, 0.27%
eLife Sciences Publications
13 publications, 0.25%
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
12 publications, 0.23%
Pleiades Publishing
10 publications, 0.2%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
10 publications, 0.2%
SAGE
8 publications, 0.16%
Mary Ann Liebert
6 publications, 0.12%
AIP Publishing
5 publications, 0.1%
Walter de Gruyter
5 publications, 0.1%
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
5.1k
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Madhavi Sastry G. et al. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments // Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 2013. Vol. 27. No. 3. pp. 221-234.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Madhavi Sastry G., Adzhigirey M., Day T., Annabhimoju R., Sherman W. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments // Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 2013. Vol. 27. No. 3. pp. 221-234.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8
TI - Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments
T2 - Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
AU - Madhavi Sastry, G.
AU - Adzhigirey, Matvey
AU - Day, Tyler
AU - Annabhimoju, Ramakrishna
AU - Sherman, Woody
PY - 2013
DA - 2013/03/01
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 221-234
IS - 3
VL - 27
PMID - 23579614
SN - 0920-654X
SN - 1573-4951
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2013_Madhavi Sastry,
author = {G. Madhavi Sastry and Matvey Adzhigirey and Tyler Day and Ramakrishna Annabhimoju and Woody Sherman},
title = {Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments},
journal = {Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design},
year = {2013},
volume = {27},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8},
number = {3},
pages = {221--234},
doi = {10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Madhavi Sastry, G., et al. “Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments.” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol. 27, no. 3, Mar. 2013, pp. 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8.