Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
2.1
SJR
0.778
CiteScore
3.1
Categories
Behavioral Neuroscience
Developmental Neuroscience
Areas
Neuroscience
Years of issue
1968-2025
journal names
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
BRAIN BEHAV EVOLUT
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Comparative Neurology
(7656 citations)

Brain, Behavior and Evolution
(2728 citations)

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
(2656 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of California, San Diego
(40 publications)

Cornell University
(36 publications)

Scripps Institution of Oceanography
(36 publications)

University of Lethbridge
(4 publications)

Lund University
(2 publications)

Vanderbilt University
(2 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 615
Q1

Continuous use of AI technology: the roles of trust and satisfaction
Lam T.
PurposeChat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), a chatbot with artificial intelligence (AI) technology, opens up new directions for innovation. However, the extent to which literature has not considered the trustworthiness and satisfaction of ChatGPT. Those are important elements leading to continuous use (CU). Particularly, this study investigates the use of the ChatGPT Translate function. Requirements for task-AI-technology fit, trust and satisfaction relevant to ChatGPT Translate are addressed in this study.Design/methodology/approachTask-technology fit (TTF) theory forms the theoretical lens to examine the influences of TTF, AI-tech trust and satisfaction on CU of AI technology. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection. Structural equation modeling was employed to test the research model.FindingsThe findings show task and technology characteristics have positive effects on task-AI-technology fit. Task-AI-technology fit has a positive effect on AI-tech trust, which in turn has a positive effect on the CU of AI technology. Finally, the level of CU of AI technology by users satisfied with its responses is higher than users dissatisfied with its responses.Originality/valueThe results have important theoretical and practical implications for academia and industry to devise strategies and policies on a free-to-use AI system.
Q1

Investigating the impact of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intention and word-of-mouth in S-commerce
Kakkar A., Kalia P., Panesar A., Sood R.
PurposeThis study investigates the impact of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intentions and word-of-mouth in S-commerce.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 1,162 respondents in India using a quantitative methodology and convenience sampling. The conceptual model and hypotheses were examined using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).FindingsThe findings illustrate that perceived value is influenced by quality, technology and trust. Comprehending perceived value is essential for influencing customers’ buying choices and their inclination to promote favorable word-of-mouth regarding S-commerce websites. In addition, system quality was the most significant predictor among the nine predictors of perceived value for S-commerce sites.Originality/valueThis study represents an initial investigation to elucidate the influence of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intentions and word-of-mouth behavior during Indian consumers’ transition to social commerce, thereby enabling marketers to enhance their business and customer retention strategies.
Q1

A behavioral intention model of Gen Z female’ health information behavior on social media
Afifi S., Bakti I.G., Yaman A., Sumaedi S.
PurposeThis study aims to develop and validate a behavioral intention model for understanding the health information behavior of Generation Z females on social media. The model integrates variables such as familiarity, e-health literacy, trust and altruistic motivation.Design/methodology/approachConducted in Indonesia, the online survey involved 516 active female Generation Z respondents (aged 17–26) seeking health information on social media in the past six months. Utilizing the partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM), the study employed Smart PLS Version 4.0 for rigorous model validation and hypothesis testing in two stages: measurement and structural model analyses. This encompassed evaluating reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity.FindingsResults indicate that familiarity, e-health literacy, trust and altruistic motivation significantly influence the health information behavior of Generation Z females on social media. Furthermore, both familiarity and e-health literacy positively impact trust in social media as a reliable health information source. The study explores theoretical, managerial and policy implications.Originality/valueSocial media has become a crucial platform for health-related information, particularly among Generation Z females. Despite this, there is a significant research gap in the behavioral intention model for Generation Z females’ health information behavior on social media. This study introduces a unique information behavioral intention model shedding light on this behavior.
Q1

Understanding the role of privacy issues in AIoT device adoption within smart homes: an integrated model of privacy calculus and technology acceptance
Liang S., Shi C.
PurposeThe proliferation of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) devices has introduced notable privacy concerns, influencing user adoption and trust. This study integrates privacy calculus theory with the technology acceptance model to analyze how privacy risk perception affects users’ intentions to adopt and continue using AIoT devices.Design/methodology/approachA research model was developed and validated using data from 313 AIoT users. Findings indicate that perceived usefulness and ease of use significantly enhance users’ trust in AIoT devices. Additionally, prior privacy experiences and privacy knowledge amplify users’ privacy concerns.FindingsPrivacy risk perception and concerns reduce trust in AIoT devices but do not significantly deter continued usage intentions, highlighting a “privacy paradox” where functionality and convenience outweigh privacy concerns. Future research is encouraged to examine user attitudes across diverse demographics and controlled settings to gain deeper insights into privacy perceptions and behaviors toward AIoT.Originality/valueThese findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of AIoT adoption dynamics and offer practical implications for designing privacy-conscious AIoT applications.
Q1

Google Discover data-driven study of user activity on e-commerce platforms
Strzelecki A., Rizun M.
PurposeThis research focuses on the analysis of the recommendation algorithms employed by Google Discover, utilizing data from two e-commerce platforms operating in Poland.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses the information obtained from Google Search Console in a time span of 17 months. The examination of Google Discover focuses on the number of displays, clicks and click-through ratio, from the viewpoints of content publishers and web users.FindingsThe results suggest that user engagement positively influences a website’s efficiency in Google Discover, yet the algorithm also considers variables such as the popularity of similar content on other websites, user location and content update frequency. Thus, a website may be excluded from Discover despite a substantial click count.Originality/valueThere is a lack of studies on how Google Discover is perceived by users based on real data. We offer a quantitative perspective, which has not yet been done. This study offers an overview of the history and evolution of Google Discovery, an overview of data we used to show the perception of the service, and two unique perspectives on recommender service, users and publishers.
Q1

A riot of blooms begins to dazzle the eye: cognitive behavior with multimodal discourse during usefulness judgments of health information
Chen J., Zhang L.
PurposeAs the two sides of the same coin, usefulness and usability have emerged as pivotal research themes in user experience field. This study compares cognitive effort and cognitive resource allocation strategy across documents varying perceived usefulness and then across documents with different objective usability (unimodal vs multimodal discourses).Design/methodology/approachA controlled user study of four identifying tasks related to public health epidemics was conducted to collect data, including document usefulness as perceived by participants, presentation modes of the document and gaze behaviors on each document.FindingsUsefulness and modality discourse impact cognitive effort and resource allocation strategy in health information search. In useless health documents, spatial encoding resource spending increased significantly with multimodal discourse, and a spatial browsing strategy with an evident exploratory feature was applied; while in useful documents, including low-useful and high-useful, both spatial and information encoding resource spending increased significantly with multimodal discourse, and an information processing strategy with an evident comprehensive feature was applied. Notably, multimodal discourse failed to enhance decision-making effectiveness. Furthermore, in useful documents, the interaction effect of the presentation mode of useful information and multimodal discourse on cognitive effort followed an inverted U-shape pattern.Originality/valueThis paper sheds new light on the interaction effect of usefulness and usability on cognitive effort and resource allocation strategy, highlighting its significance in cognitive effort detecting for multimodal discourse and improving effectiveness and efficacy of health information identification by optimizing information presentation mode design.
Q1

Consumer response to OTT subscription promotions in Taiwan: a prospective theoretical perspective
Chen Y., Han H., Hsiao W.
PurposeThis article investigates the impact of consumers’ promotion strategies on the effectiveness of promotional campaigns for subscribing to Over-the-Top (OTT) streaming services, from a prospective theoretical perspective. Additionally, it explores the moderating effects of platform type and subscriber type on promotion strategies in the context of OTT streaming services.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs an experimental design to separately examine the promotion strategies of subscribers. The first part investigates the effect of promotion strategies on promotional effectiveness, regardless of platform and subscriber types, while the second part considers the moderating effects of both platform type and subscriber type on promotional effectiveness.FindingsThe analysis reveals that renewed subscribers exhibit a positive attitude toward incremental promotions and have stronger intentions to subscribe and recommend. Nonrenewed subscribers, in contrast, prefer discount promotions, demonstrating a positive attitude toward them and expressing higher intentions to subscribe and recommend.Originality/valueThis study applies prospect theory to OTT promotion strategies, uncovers the psychological drivers behind promotion effectiveness and examines the moderating role of subscriber type and platform type, thereby providing actionable insights to improve consumers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions.
Q1

Study on the model of factors influencing users’ willingness to participate in misinformation purification on the Weibo platform
Zhao Y., Li G., Mo Z.
PurposeTo explore the influence factors and pathways of users’ willingness to participate in the misinformation purification process on the Weibo platform. The findings of this study are expected to provide valuable insights that can enhance the self-purification mechanisms for misinformation on Weibo, thereby contributing to the effective misinformation control.Design/methodology/approachThe theoretical framework of the quantitative study is a conceptual model integrated with the theory of planned behavior (TPB), social exchange theory (SET) and co-dependency theory. This model was developed to elucidate the influence factors of users’ willingness to participate in the purification of misinformation on the Weibo platform, the conceptual model was tested and refined through questionnaire surveys, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to assess its validity and reliability.FindingsThe findings reveal that the attitude toward misinformation purification on the Weibo platform exerts the most significant positive influence on the willingness to engage in such activities. Within the context of this research, community involvement and reciprocity are identified as the factors that have the most substantial positive impact on users’ attitude toward misinformation purification. Conversely, risk perception does not demonstrate a significant influence on users’ attitude toward misinformation purification.Originality/valueTaking the Weibo platform as an example, this is a pioneering study on the investigation and mechanism of social media self-purification on misinformation and proposes a new perspective to improve the effectiveness of the social media self-purification mechanism from the perspective of focusing on user intention and motivation.
Q1

Chatbot research in the fields of business and information systems: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis
Li Z., Wu C., Li J., Yuan Q.
PurposeChatbots are increasingly embodied in business and IS contexts to enhance customer and user experience. Despite wide interest in chatbots among business and IS academics, surprisingly, there are no current comprehensive reviews to reveal the knowledge structure of chatbot research in such areas.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed a mixed-method approach that combines systematic review and bibliometric analysis to provide a comprehensive synthesis of chatbot research. The sample was obtained in December 2023 after searching across six databases: EBSCOhost, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Computer Society Digital Library.FindingsThis study reveals the major trend in publication trends, countries, article performance and cluster distribution of chatbot research. We also identify the key themes of chatbot research, which mainly focus on how users interact with chatbots and their consequences, such as users’ cognition and behavior. Moreover, several important research agendas have been discussed to address some limitations in the current chatbot research in business and IS fields.Originality/valueThe present review is one of the first attempts to systematically reveal the ongoing knowledge map of chatbots in business and IS fields, which makes important contributions and provides useful resources for future chatbot research and practice.
Q1

Examining generative AI user continuance intention based on the SOR model
Zhou T., Ma X.
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to examine generative artificial intelligence (AI) user continuance intention based on the stimulus-organism-response model.Design/methodology/approachWe adopted a mixed method of structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to conduct data analysis.FindingsThe results found that generative AI content quality (perceived personalization, perceived accuracy and perceived credibility) and system quality (perceived interactivity, perceived anthropomorphism and perceived intelligence) affect sense of empowerment and satisfaction, both of which further determine continuance intention.Originality/valueExtant research has identified the effect of flow, trust and parasocial interaction on generative AI user continuance, but it has seldom disclosed the internal decisional process of generative AI user continuance intention. This research tries to fill this gap, and the results enrich the extant research on generative AI user continuance.
Q1

The impact of emotional cues on the information-gathering willingness of paid knowledge users
Cao Y., Deng X.
PurposeThis study aims to explore the impact of emotional cues in knowledge product descriptions on users’ willingness to gather information. It specifically focuses on how different types of textual emotional cues, including heuristic cues like “emotional titles” and systematic cues like “emotional synopses,” influence users’ information-gathering willingness and examines the mediating role of emotional arousal in this process.Design/methodology/approachA conceptual model was developed by integrating the heuristic-systematic model with cue utilization theory. The experimental design employed knowledge product descriptions from the “Knowledge Column” section of the Zhihu platform. A controlled experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of varying emotional cues in these descriptions on participants’ willingness to gather information.FindingsThe study identified two types of emotional cues – heuristic cues, such as “emotional titles,” and systematic cues, such as “emotional synopses” – that significantly and positively influence users' information-gathering willingness. Additionally, emotional arousal was found to mediate the relationship between emotional cues and users’ willingness to gather information in the context of knowledge payments.Originality/valueThis study confirms that emotional cues in knowledge product descriptions, mediated by emotional arousal, can enhance the information-gathering willingness of knowledge payment users. The research deepens the theoretical exploration of information behavior among online knowledge payment users, providing valuable insights for knowledge producers on effectively leveraging emotional cues to attract potential customers as well as offering guidance for knowledge payment users in their information-gathering practices.
Q1

Motivating user engagement in online health Q&A communities: do contingent financial incentives matter?
He L., Huang Y., Li S., Zhou X.
PurposeUser engagement is critical for online health Q&A communities. Financial incentives, which vary across different communities and reward schemes, are expected to motivate such contribution behaviors. Even though financial incentives have been extensively examined in prior studies, the impact of newly designed contingent financial incentives of a new pay-for-answer reward scheme has not been empirically examined in any online health Q&A community. Given this research gap, our study aims to perform an exploratory investigation of the effects of contingent financial incentives on user engagement in terms of knowledge contribution and social interactions.Design/methodology/approachBased on expectancy-value theory and equity theory, a research model was developed to reflect the influences of contingent financial incentives on user engagement. A unique dataset was gathered from a large online health Q&A community utilizing this contingent financial incentive reward structure, and the Heckman selection model was applied using a two-step procedure to test these hypotheses. Possible endogeneity issues were also addressed in the robustness check.FindingsOur results demonstrate that the effect of contingent financial incentives on answer quantity and quality is quadratic. Additionally, our study reveals that this contingent financial incentive enhances both comment and emotional interactions among users.Originality/valueOur study enriches the literature on financial incentives, knowledge contribution and user engagement by revealing the nuanced effects of financial incentives within a novel pay-for-answer scheme. This study also offers significant implications for practitioners involved in online community incentive design.
Q1

Feedback from the younger generation on health information shared by their parents on WeChat: types, antecedents and consequences
Li X., Liu M., Song X., Zhu Q.
PurposeIn China, it is prevalent for parents to share health information on WeChat and receive feedback from their children. This study aims to investigate the feedback from younger generations regarding their parents’ health information sharing. It will examine the different types of feedback, explore the factors influencing it and analyze the outcomes that result from this feedback exchange.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical findings draw on the qualitative analysis using grounded theory. This study collects data from 34 participants (17 pairs of one young person and one parent) through in-depth interviews and WeChat chat records. Then, a theoretical model was developed through open, axial and selective coding.FindingsFeedback can be classified into five types: support, correction, perfunctoriness, ostracism and rejection as well as into “Affective-Behavioral-Cognitive” dimensions. Younger generations’ feedback types are influenced by a variety of factors, including information, emotion and individual and family-related factors. Each feedback type has distinct effects, such as altering older generations’ emotional and communication responses.Originality/valueThis pioneering study explores how younger generations in China perceive their parents’ health information sharing on social media. It highlights the importance of feedback in this context, providing actionable insights to enhance digital literacy among older adults, strengthen family bonds and enhance the spread of valuable and scientific health information online.
Q1

Does ChatGPT affect users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities?
Li G., Zhu M.X.
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the impact of ChatGPT on users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online question-and-answer (Q&A) communities based on social exchange theory and stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from a Chinese online Q&A community, and the difference-in-differences (DID) model was employed to verify the proposed hypotheses.FindingsThe results show that ChatGPT negatively impacts users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities, with variations observed across different knowledge domains.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt to examine the impact of ChatGPT on users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities. The findings provide valuable insights for community managers to develop strategies for mitigating the effects of ChatGPT on online Q&A communities.
Q1

Promoting health behavioral intention through short videos: roles of audiovisual cross-modal correspondence in health communication
Xu Y., Jiang T., Hu X., Tian H.
PurposeHealth short videos are serving as a powerful tool for encouraging individuals to actively adopt healthier behaviors. The sensory cues applied in these videos can be useful for engaging peripheral processing and enhancing attitudes. While previous research has examined the effects of various single cues, this study features a pioneering attempt to explore the roles of audiovisual cross-modal correspondence, encompassing multisensory cues perceived through different modalities, in health communication.Design/methodology/approachA 2 (color: warm/cool) × 2 (music tempo: fast/slow) between-subjects experiment was conducted to observe 120 participants’ responses to a health short video promoting eye health that was created using four different combinations of background color and background music tempo.FindingsIt was found that the congruent color–tempo pairings, that is blue & slow and orange & fast, led to more positive attitudes toward the videos than the incongruent pairings, that is blue & fast and orange & slow. The effect of cross-modal correspondence on attitude was fully mediated by processing fluency, with gender acting as a moderator between the two variables. Furthermore, individuals’ attitudes toward a short video positively influenced their health behavioral intentions.Originality/valueThese findings not only lend support to the theoretical framework of “multisensory cues-fluency-attitude-intention” chain for persuasion purposes but also have practical implications for creating effective health short videos.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
|
Journal of Comparative Neurology
7656 citations, 9.51%
|
|
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
2728 citations, 3.39%
|
|
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
2656 citations, 3.3%
|
|
Brain Research
2178 citations, 2.71%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Biology
1317 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
909 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Neuroscience
904 citations, 1.12%
|
|
PLoS ONE
864 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Behavioural Brain Research
737 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
675 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Animal Behaviour
673 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Journal of Morphology
651 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Hormones and Behavior
639 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Journal of Neurophysiology
608 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Physiology and Behavior
597 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Anatomical Record
589 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Brain Research Bulletin
554 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Brain Structure and Function
550 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Scientific Reports
549 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
519 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy
517 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
509 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Journal of Neuroscience
468 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
467 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Neuroscience Letters
464 citations, 0.58%
|
|
General and Comparative Endocrinology
460 citations, 0.57%
|
|
European Journal of Neuroscience
457 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Progress in Brain Research
365 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Hearing Research
362 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Cerebral Cortex
361 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Fish Biology
355 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
353 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Brain Research Reviews
347 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Visual Neuroscience
344 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Experimental Neurology
329 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Current Biology
322 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Animal Cognition
321 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Anatomy
309 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Vision Research
289 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroscience
275 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Behavioural Processes
272 citations, 0.34%
|
|
The Human Auditory Cortex
269 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Progress in Neurobiology
266 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Science
251 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
246 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
234 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Developmental Brain Research
232 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Integrative and Comparative Biology
231 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
229 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Cell and Tissue Research
227 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Neurobiology
224 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
210 citations, 0.26%
|
|
eLife
205 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Neuroscience Research
202 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Experimental Brain Research
193 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Developmental Biology
191 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Developmental Neurobiology
181 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Zoology
181 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Human Evolution
172 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Trends in Neurosciences
172 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
168 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Neuron
168 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Biological Reviews
166 citations, 0.21%
|
|
NeuroImage
165 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Fish Physiology
163 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Environmental Biology of Fishes
161 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Anatomy and Embryology
161 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Ethology
158 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
155 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
155 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Biology Letters
151 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Microscopy Research and Technique
144 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Nature Communications
143 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
142 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
142 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Behavioral Ecology
140 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Arthropod Structure and Development
138 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology
138 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology
134 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Physiology-Paris
127 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Animals
125 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nature
124 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
121 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
120 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
120 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Development (Cambridge)
119 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
116 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Zoological Science
114 citations, 0.14%
|
|
PeerJ
113 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
106 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Naturalist
104 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
102 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Neuropsychologia
100 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Neurophysiology
99 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
94 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Ecology and Evolution
94 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
94 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Zoology
94 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
93 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology
92 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
|
Elsevier
21333 citations, 26.51%
|
|
Wiley
16278 citations, 20.23%
|
|
Springer Nature
8811 citations, 10.95%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
3812 citations, 4.74%
|
|
S. Karger AG
2892 citations, 3.59%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2090 citations, 2.6%
|
|
Oxford University Press
1840 citations, 2.29%
|
|
The Royal Society
1588 citations, 1.97%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
1508 citations, 1.87%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1343 citations, 1.67%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1106 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1054 citations, 1.31%
|
|
American Physiological Society
771 citations, 0.96%
|
|
MDPI
766 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
591 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
554 citations, 0.69%
|
|
SAGE
383 citations, 0.48%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
380 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
366 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Annual Reviews
263 citations, 0.33%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
255 citations, 0.32%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
248 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
243 citations, 0.3%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
169 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
164 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
157 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Zoological Society of Japan
136 citations, 0.17%
|
|
PeerJ
124 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
113 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
99 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
94 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Brill
91 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
82 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
78 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOP Publishing
76 citations, 0.09%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
64 citations, 0.08%
|
|
SciELO
59 citations, 0.07%
|
|
MIT Press
58 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
57 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
49 citations, 0.06%
|
|
BMJ
45 citations, 0.06%
|
|
F1000 Research
40 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
39 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
37 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Ornithologists' Union
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Arachnological Society
25 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
25 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
24 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Scientific
23 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
23 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
23 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
23 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
22 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Herpetologists League
22 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
22 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IntechOpen
21 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IMR Press
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Magnolia Press
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for the Study of Reproduction
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Springer Vienna
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
16 citations, 0.02%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Museum of Natural History (BioOne sponsored)
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOS Press
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ornithological Society of Japan
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Wilson Ornithological Society
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bioscientifica
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
AIP Publishing
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Emerald
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Colegio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Museum and Institute of Zoology at the Polish Academy of Sciences
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japanese Society of Fisheries Science
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society for Comparative Endocrinology
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society for Brain and Neural Science
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Japanese Society for Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japanese Society of Animal Psychology
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
University of California, San Diego
40 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Cornell University
36 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
36 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
33 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Queensland
28 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
26 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Western Australia
23 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of New South Wales
22 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
22 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Michigan State University
21 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Emory University
19 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Harvard University
18 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Washington
17 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Auckland
16 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
16 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Alberta
16 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
15 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Nippon Medical School
15 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
14 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Arizona
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Lethbridge
13 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Tennessee
12 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
11 publications, 0.36%
|
|
George Washington University
11 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Chicago
11 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Georgia State University
11 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Utah
11 publications, 0.36%
|
|
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences
10 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
10 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
10 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Florida
10 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
10 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
10 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Stanford University
9 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Oregon State University
9 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of California, Davis
9 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
9 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Hiroshima University
9 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
9 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Creighton University
9 publications, 0.29%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
8 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Duke University
8 publications, 0.26%
|
|
McGill University
8 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
8 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Brown University
8 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
8 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Uppsala University
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Oxford
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Birmingham
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Sydney
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Dalhousie University
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Ohio State University
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Ohio University
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Bremen
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Bielefeld University
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
7 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Tübingen
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Zurich
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Macquarie University
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Columbia University
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Princeton University
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Northern Arizona University
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Michigan
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Rockefeller University
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Göttingen
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Temple University
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Victoria
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Toronto
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Lleida
6 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Liège
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Lund University
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Australian National University
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Turin
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Monash University
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Tasmania
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Boston University
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Nagoya University
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Cologne
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Vienna
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Western University
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Valencia
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Kentucky
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Rochester
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University College London
4 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
|
|
University of Lethbridge
4 publications, 2.48%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
University of Alberta
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Wilmington
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Basque Foundation for Science
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Geneva
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Sorbonne University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Scuola Normale Superiore
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Western Australia
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Macquarie University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
La Trobe University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
George Washington University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Auburn University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
New York University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Chicago
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Rockefeller University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Hyogo Medical University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Ehime University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Exeter
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Miami
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Louisiana State University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Lleida
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Utah State University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Utah Valley University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Utah
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Show all (27 more) | |
1
2
3
4
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
USA
|
USA, 833, 27.22%
USA
833 publications, 27.22%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 126, 4.12%
Germany
126 publications, 4.12%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 112, 3.66%
Australia
112 publications, 3.66%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 88, 2.88%
Canada
88 publications, 2.88%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 74, 2.42%
Japan
74 publications, 2.42%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 73, 2.39%
Spain
73 publications, 2.39%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 50, 1.63%
United Kingdom
50 publications, 1.63%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 29, 0.95%
Netherlands
29 publications, 0.95%
|
France
|
France, 23, 0.75%
France
23 publications, 0.75%
|
China
|
China, 20, 0.65%
China
20 publications, 0.65%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 20, 0.65%
Brazil
20 publications, 0.65%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 19, 0.62%
Italy
19 publications, 0.62%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 18, 0.59%
New Zealand
18 publications, 0.59%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 17, 0.56%
Sweden
17 publications, 0.56%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 13, 0.42%
Israel
13 publications, 0.42%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 13, 0.42%
South Africa
13 publications, 0.42%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 12, 0.39%
Russia
12 publications, 0.39%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 11, 0.36%
Austria
11 publications, 0.36%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 9, 0.29%
Norway
9 publications, 0.29%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 8, 0.26%
Switzerland
8 publications, 0.26%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 7, 0.23%
Argentina
7 publications, 0.23%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 6, 0.2%
Hungary
6 publications, 0.2%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 6, 0.2%
Denmark
6 publications, 0.2%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.16%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.16%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 0.16%
Belgium
5 publications, 0.16%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.16%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.16%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.16%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.16%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 5, 0.16%
Uruguay
5 publications, 0.16%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 5, 0.16%
Chile
5 publications, 0.16%
|
India
|
India, 4, 0.13%
India
4 publications, 0.13%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.13%
Poland
4 publications, 0.13%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.1%
Greece
3 publications, 0.1%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.1%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.1%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.1%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.1%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.07%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 2, 0.07%
Panama
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 2, 0.07%
Puerto Rico
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.07%
Finland
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.03%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.03%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.03%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.03%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.03%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.03%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.03%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.03%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.03%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.03%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 1, 0.03%
USSR
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (18 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
USA
|
USA, 13, 8.07%
USA
13 publications, 8.07%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 4.35%
Spain
7 publications, 4.35%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 5, 3.11%
Germany
5 publications, 3.11%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 1.86%
Australia
3 publications, 1.86%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 1.86%
Canada
3 publications, 1.86%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 1.86%
Sweden
3 publications, 1.86%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 2, 1.24%
United Kingdom
2 publications, 1.24%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 1.24%
Denmark
2 publications, 1.24%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 1.24%
Switzerland
2 publications, 1.24%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.62%
France
1 publication, 0.62%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.62%
India
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.62%
Italy
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.62%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.62%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.62%
Japan
1 publication, 0.62%
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
2 profile journal articles
Fedrigo Olivier
57 publications,
3 971 citations
h-index: 20