Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
8.2
SJR
2.594
CiteScore
17.9
Categories
Information Systems
Information Systems and Management
Management Information Systems
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Computer Science
Decision Sciences
Years of issue
1977-2025
journal names
Information and Management
INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER
Top-3 citing journals

Information and Management
(7711 citations)

Computers in Human Behavior
(2815 citations)

Sustainability
(2813 citations)
Top-3 organizations

City University of Hong Kong
(77 publications)

National University of Singapore
(70 publications)

Georgia State University
(39 publications)

City University of Hong Kong
(18 publications)

Xi'an Jiaotong University
(17 publications)

Harbin Institute of Technology
(12 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 3032
Q1

Revealing the mechanisms of adopting innovative on-site industrialized construction technology: an integrated SEM-ISM method
Liu X., Li Z., Ma S., Meng Q., Zheng R.
PurposeOn-site industrialized construction (OIC) represents a significant innovation direction for the industrial transformation of the construction industry. However, compared to prefabricated construction (PC) technology, OIC technology has not received sufficient attention. In particular, the lack of mechanisms for the adoption of OIC technology has significantly hindered the innovation and diffusion of this technology. This paper aims to address this gap by identifying the drivers and barriers of OIC technology and exploring the logical relationships among these influencing factors.Design/methodology/approachTherefore, this study aims to analyze the factors influencing OIC technology adoption, focusing on both drivers and barriers, to promote its adoption among construction companies. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is employed to validate the significance of influencing factors, while interpretive structural modeling (ISM) is utilized to explore the interrelationships among the factors supported by PLS-SEM.FindingsThe results of PLS-SEM show that relative advantage, regulatory support, top management support, organizational readiness and market demand positively influence adoption intention, while perceived risk, complexity and cost have a negative impact. Additionally, the root driver identified by ISM analysis is labor shortage, and the root barrier is comprehension presents challenges. It is noteworthy that the root driver is derived from market demand, but the low path coefficient for market demand in PLS-SEM indicates limited direct effects. This suggests that market demand influences adoption intention by driving other mediating factors, which still require sufficient attention.Originality/valueThis study elucidates the factors and mechanisms influencing the adoption of OIC technology, supplementing the knowledge base in the domains of industrialized construction (IC) and engineering technological innovation. Additionally, it offers valuable insights for construction companies actively engaged in construction industrialization reform, facilitating the effective promotion of OIC technology.
Q1

Improving CSR performance of food processing firms with operational risks: does digital investment matter?
Ouyang Y., Ye F., Li Y.
PurposeCorporate social responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a prominent public concern; however, within the agricultural sector, many firms demonstrate unsatisfactory performance in terms of CSR activities. Drawing upon the behavioral theory of the firm, this study aims to investigate how operational risks faced by agriculture-related firms affect its CSR practices.Design/methodology/approachUsing a data of 136 Chinese food processing firms with 909 observations from 2011 to 2021, this study constructs the fixed-effect model to analyze the relationship among operational risks, digital investment and CSR practices.FindingsThe empirical evidence shows that competition risk significantly improves CSR performance while financial risk hinders it. The results of moderation analysis further reveal that digital investment strengthens the positive effect of competition risk and the negative effect of financial risk, although the latter is not statistically significant.Originality/valueOverall, by establishing a link between operational risks and CSR practices, this study contributes to clarifying decision-making rules for food processing firms and deepening the understanding of why and when they adopt social responsibility initiatives.
Q1

Is digitalization a double-edged sword for innovation? A buyer–supplier dyad
Yang W., Song Z., Zhou Y., Cheng L.
PurposeDigitalization presents both opportunities and challenges for collaborative innovation within supply chains (SCs). Based on resource dependence theory (RDT), this study examines the underlying mechanisms of digitalization and innovation performance, elucidating the mediation and moderating role of interfirm IT integration and relational norms in the above relationships.Design/methodology/approachHierarchical regression analysis is used to test the model from 170 buyer–supplier dyads in China.FindingsThis study’s empirical findings demonstrate that digitalization has an inverted U-shaped relationship with innovation performance in buyer–supplier relationships (BSRs), and interfirm IT integration partially mediates this relationship. Specifically, digitalization has an inverted U-shaped relationship with interfirm IT integration, and interfirm IT integration positively affects innovation performance. Finally, relational norms moderate this inverted U-shaped relationship, making it steeper.Originality/valueThis study embeds the impact of digitalization on innovation performance within SC relationships. By using the buyer–supplier dyad as the analysis unit, the study reveals that digitalization brings both benefits and risks to innovation performance in BSRs. Furthermore, by clarifying the role of interfirm IT integration and relational norms, the study uncovers the mediating mechanisms and boundary conditions in this relationship, thereby enriching the understanding of SC digitalization.
Q1

Examining the nexus: supply chain quality management, knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and strategic business performance
Lim A., Ooi K., Lee V., Tan G.W., Sohal A.
PurposeManufacturers face many challenges in continual innovation and strategical adaptation to environmental changes. Businesses must embrace evolved management theory while implementing a robust supply chain quality management (SCQM) strategy for a sustainable supply chain (SDG12). However, there is a dearth of awareness in applying knowledge-based dynamic capability (KBDC) in SCQM. Furthermore, knowledge sharing, an important component of KBDC, has received less attention when assessing organizational innovation and strategic business performance (SBP). Hence, our study aims to identify the impact of SCQM practices on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP by applying the KBDC theory.Design/methodology/approachWe empirically tested 204 valid questionnaire responses received from Malaysian manufacturers using a deep partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) analysis.FindingsOur study reveals that SCQM practices have a significant direct impact on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP. Furthermore, our research indicates that knowledge sharing mediates (partially complementary mediation) the association between SCQM practices and organizational innovation but not SCQM practices and SBP.Originality/valueOur study contributes to the KBDC theory by illustrating the significance of SCQM practices on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP. The study findings provide a greater understanding of the impact of SCQM practices on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP, thereby shedding light on the importance of practices related to human capital development and integration that manufacturers should consider when designing a SCQM system. The study shall assist the manufacturers in achieving a sustainable supply chain (SDG 12).
Q1

The role of IT governance and organizational agility in enhancing firm performance: a study of Asian and Latin American firms
Yoshikuni A.C., Dwivedi R., Kamal M.M., Fosso Wamba S., Dwivedi P.
PurposeThe role of information technology governance (ITG) is crucial to enable organizational agility (OA) to leverage firm performance (FP). ITG capability helps firms optimize market and operational activities and improves corporate performance. Therefore, the paper aims to examine the relationship between ITG’s capability to emerge AO and leverage FP in developing economies.Design/methodology/approachThis research is conducted in an empirical setting comprising a quantitative cross-country survey based on a sample of 433 enterprises from Asia (AS) and Latin America (LA) regions.FindingsThe outcome of the research demonstrates the significant impact of ITG capability on OA to achieve FP. The results further indicate that ITG capability plays a vital role in the FP through operational adjustment agility than market capitalizing agility in AS than LA organizations.Practical implicationsThe empirical study demonstrates that managers must better understand how ITG capability was composed through IT strategy, IT architecture, IT infrastructure, IT business knowledge and IT management to influence OA to gain FP independently of the region.Originality/valueThe findings offer valuable insights for academics and practitioners into ITG capability, appropriate IT architecture, IT infrastructure, IT business knowledge, IT management and IT strategy to reach dynamic capability in organizational agility to enhance FP in developing economies.
Q1

Balanced social media engagement and firm performance in consumer goods industry
Shu S., Zhang H.
PurposeThis paper investigates the spillover effect of firms’ social media engagement with investors on consumption market performance and examines the impact of balanced/imbalanced social media stakeholder engagement strategies on firms’ consumption market performance.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs multi-source secondary data covering 3,856 quarterly observations of 188 firms in the Chinese retail industry over six years (2015–2020). Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology are used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe study reveals that firms’ social media engagement with investors has a positive spillover effect on consumption market performance. Additionally, the authors find that a balanced social media engagement strategy, which allocates resources evenly between consumers and investors, is more likely to optimize firm performance than an imbalanced strategy.Originality/valueThe research reveals cross-stakeholder spillover effects of social media engagement, introduces balanced/imbalanced engagement strategy concepts and extends the balanced marketing perspective to the social media context, providing guidance for firms to optimize their social media strategies.
Q1

Timing and interdependencies in blockchain capabilities development for supply chain management: a resource-based view perspective
Lima B., Ganga G.M., Godinho Filho M., De Santa-Eulalia L.A., Thürer M., Queiroz M.M., Moraes K.K.
PurposeUsing the resource-based view (RBV), our study aims to provide theoretical and empirical insights into blockchain capabilities’ (BCs) compounded and sequential effects on supply chain competitive advantages (CA).Design/methodology/approachWe combined a systematic literature review and an expert interview. Interpretive Structural Modelling and a Matrix of Cross-Impact Multiplications Applied to Classification were used to determine the relationship between the capabilities. Simple Additive Weighting assessed each capability’s relative importance and impact.FindingsWe reveal a sequential development path for BCs. Foundational capabilities, such as cybersecurity, provide immediate performance benefits, establishing a unique, valuable and inimitable resource. As firms progress to advanced capabilities, the compounded value of these capabilities generates a stronger, dynamic resource for sustained CA. Moreover, the study underscores the strategic importance of timing in adopting and developing BCs, as early adoption can secure a competitive edge difficult for later entrants to replicate.Practical implicationsOur proposed framework guides managers in incorporating blockchain technology into supply chain management (SCM) processes once it demonstrates that firms can enhance their CA by prioritizing the technical basics BC, leveraging the informational capabilities in level two and enabling effective problem-solving through level three. Our framework also shows that a learning process occurs as BCs are used and their results are explored.Originality/valueOur study extends the RBV by demonstrating BCs’ cumulative and interdependent nature in SCM. It emphasizes the synergistic interactions between these capabilities, which collectively enhance CA.
Q1

A dual adversarial structure of generative adversarial network for nature language generation
Sue K., Chen Y.
PurposeRecently, due to the practicability in several domains, generative adversarial network (GAN) has successfully been adopted in the field of natural language generation (NLG). The purpose of this paper focuses on improving the quality of text and generating sequences similar to human writing for several real applications.Design/methodology/approachA novel model, GAN2, is developed based on a GAN with dual adversarial architecture. We train the generator by an internal discriminator with a beam search technique to improve the quality of generated sequences. Then, we enhance the generator with an external discriminator to optimize and strengthen the learning process of sequence generation.FindingsThe proposed GAN2 model could be utilized in widespread applications, such as chatbots, machine translation and image description. By the proposed dual adversarial structure, we significantly improve the quality of the generated text. The average and top-1 metrics, such as NLL, BLEU and ROUGE, are used to measure the generated sentences from the GAN2 model over all baselines. Several experiments are conducted to demonstrate the performance and superiority of the proposed model compared with the state-of-the-art methods on numerous evaluation metrics.Originality/valueGenerally, reward sparsity and mode collapse are two main challenging issues when adopt GAN to real NLG applications. In this study, GAN2 exploits a dual adversarial architecture which facilitates the learning process in the early training stage for solving the problem of reward sparsity. The occurrence of mode collapse also could be reduced in the later training stage with the introduced comparative discriminator by avoiding high rewards for training in a specific mode. Furthermore, the proposed model is applied to several synthetic and real datasets to show the practicability and exhibit great generalization with all discussed metrics.
Q1

Critical factors for green supply chain management implementation in footwear industry
Pai F., Yeh T., Chen Y.
PurposeThe study aims to investigate the implementation of green supply chain management (GSCM) in the footwear industry. It focuses on identifying key factors (dimensions and corresponding sub-dimensions) that promote GSCM and examines the importance and relevance of these factors in improving sustainability and competitive advantage within the footwear manufacturing supply chain.Design/methodology/approachA literature review and expert interviews were conducted to identify the factors for GSCM in the footwear industry. The DEMATEL-based ANP (DANP) method was used to analyze the importance and interrelationships of the identified dimensions and sub-dimensions. The data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed across different levels of the supply chain to compare the significant factors affecting GSCM implementation.FindingsThe study reveals that green purchasing is the core dimension, playing a critical role in the footwear industry. Organizational and environmental management emerges as the most influential causal factors, strongly correlated with other factors. However, as to sub-dimensions, different level of supply chain members should focus on different sub-dimensions.Originality/valueThis research provides valuable insights into the key dimensions and sub-dimensions and their causal relationships in the footwear industry. It offers practical suggestions for manufacturers to prioritize organizational and environmental management as a strategic approach to maximize the benefits of GSCM.
Q1

A model for selecting supply chain collaboration paradigms: the impact of intelligent manufacturing models
Hou K., Niu Z., Zhang Y.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore how to select a suitable supply chain collaboration paradigm (SCCP) based on the intelligent manufacturing model (IMM) of enterprises.Design/methodology/approachGiven the fit between internal collaboration and external collaboration, we propose a model to select a suitable SCCP based on two-sided matching between SCCPs and IMMs. In this decision problem, we invited five university scholars and seven related consultants to evaluate SCCPs and IMMs based on the regret theory, which is used to obtain the perceived utility and matching results. The evaluation values are comfortably expressed through probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs). Also, we set the lowest acceptance threshold to improve the accuracy of matching results.FindingsThe findings indicate that the characteristics of IMMs can significantly influence the selection of SCCPs, and an SCCP is not suitable for all IMMs. Interestingly, the study findings suggest that the selection of SCCP is diverse and multi-optional under the constraints of IMMs.Originality/valueExisting studies have explored supply chain collaboration (SCC) in Industry 4.0 to improve supply chain performance, but less attention has been paid to the impact of the match between SCCPs and IMMs on supply chain performance. And even fewer studies have addressed how to select a suitable SCCP in different IMMs. This study provides a unique contribution to the practice of SCC and expands the understanding of supply chain management in Industry 4.0.
Q1

Effective strategies in short video advertising: leveraging influencer endorsements and discounts
Yuan L., Shi Y., Xia H., Ye Q.
PurposeThis paper aims to examine how the number of short videos posted and the number of influencers employed, two important strategies in short video marketing, affect consumer behavior and how price discounts moderate the effects of influencer endorsement on consumer browsing and purchasing behavior.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the literature on influencer endorsement, this study used an ordinary least square model to empirically examine the two effects of endorsement strategies in increasing product traffic and sales for consumers at a short video app, Douyin (TikTok).FindingsThe results show that the number of short video ads produces the classic inverted U-shape for traffic and sales, and both effects were strengthened under a high discount condition. Whereas the number of influencers has a positive effect on traffic but produces an inverted U-shape for sales, both effects were undermined under a high discount condition.Originality/valueThis study is the first to explore the two distinct effects (repetition effect and diffusion effect) of influencer endorsement on browsing and purchasing behavior and theorize about the moderate effects of discounts on these effects.
Q1

Leveraging platform-based technologies to mitigate product returns in E-commerce: an affordance actualization perspective
Zhou Y., Li H., Yin P.
PurposeThis study investigates how online sellers can leverage platform-based technologies to mitigate product returns through the lens of affordance actualization theory. We conceptualize four categories of platform-based technologies and theorize how their affordances influence consumer perceptions and behaviors, leading to reduced return rates.Design/methodology/approachWe develop a research model grounded in affordance actualization theory and test our hypotheses using a unique longitudinal dataset from a leading e-commerce platform. We employ panel data analysis with seller fixed effects and conduct various robustness checks to ensure the reliability of our findings. We also examine the synergistic effects among different platform-based technologies and explore their varying impacts across product types and seller characteristics.FindingsThe strategic actualization of pricing, marketing, product presentation and customer service technology affordances significantly reduces product return rates. The return-mitigating effects are stronger for low-reputation sellers and high-price, high-complexity products, highlighting the contingent value of technology affordances in managing returns. Besides, we find evidence of synergistic effects among different platform-based technologies, particularly for complex products and less reputable sellers.Originality/valueThis study extends affordance actualization theory to the e-commerce context and uncovers the mechanisms and boundary conditions for platform-based technologies to mitigate product returns. We contribute to the literature by offering a novel theoretical perspective and granular insights into the role of technology in shaping a critical operational outcome in online retailing.
Q1

Will rural collective construction land marketization affect pension industry? A mixed-methods investigation
Han L., Wu H., Fang B., Zhou W.
PurposeThis paper aims to study whether rural collective construction land marketization (RCCLM) affects pension industry and analyze its impact mechanism.Design/methodology/approachBased on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and social cognition theory (SCT), this paper constructs a theoretical framework for the purchase behavior of rural retirement housing with the influence of RCCLM. A mixed-methods investigation combining qualitative and quantitative study is adopted in this paper.FindingsThe research results indicate that the purchase intention of rural retirement housing has a significant positive impact on the purchase behavior. However, RCCLM has a significant negative impact on the purchase intention of rural retirement housing. A logical framework of “land system participant behavior” has been constructed from three main bodies: government, developers and elderly urban and rural residents.Practical implicationsThis paper provides suggestions for the three entities from the perspectives of macro, medium and micro-level to improve transaction system for rural collective construction land use right (TSRCCLUR), providing references for the collective construction land marketization policy and the development of the pension industry.Originality/valueThis paper deepens the study of behavior intention in planned behavior, enriches TPB model in the study of rural retirement housing security and clarifies the influence mechanism of the rural retirement housing purchase intention with the theoretical and empirical test of the model.
Q1

Supply chain resilience and soft organizational factors – a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review
Ahmed Q., Sumbal M.S., Lee C., Tsui E.
PurposeThe advent of a dynamic and uncertain environment has shifted organizational focus from reactive to proactive approaches to develop resilience against disruptions. Organizations can strengthen their supply chain networks through strategic changes in structure and processes. In this connection, this study explores the extant literature on supply chain resilience (SCRE) concerning soft organizational factors (leadership, organizational culture and knowledge management) to analyse recent trends in this domain and propose future research directions.Design/methodology/approachIt is a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of research articles from 2004 to 2024, collected from ISI Web of Science with keywords searches such as “knowledge management and supply chain resilience,” “leadership and supply chain resilience” and “organizational culture and supply chain resilience.” “VOS viewer” and “ATLAS.ti” were utilized for the co-occurrence and co-authorship analysis of the articles along with focusing on aspects such as theoretical and practical implications, the collaboration institutions and the countries involved in relation to the topic of interest.FindingsThe review shows that the development of studies on SCRE was slow from 2004 to 2015 but grew significantly from 2015 onwards and rose exponentially after 2020. Most studies were published in 2023. Results reveal the development of proactive strategies for SCRE in the recent literature by focusing on organizational factors. The study highlights exploring the contextual interplay between environmental, social and governance (ESG) and soft organizational factors for mitigation of supply chain risk and resilience in large-scale projects.Originality/valueThe COVID-19 pandemic became the precursor to highlighting the antecedents of SCRE, but the study of soft organizational drivers is still an ongoing area of research. There is a need to map the nascent literature on the link between organizational soft drivers and SCRE.
Q1

Building organizational agility through digital transformation: a configurational approach in SMEs
Pelletier C., L'Écuyer F., Raymond L.
PurposeThis study adopts a capability-based view to investigate the attainment of organizational agility in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It first explores how these firms mobilize different types of operational and dynamic information technology (IT) capabilities to achieve a high level of agility through their digital transformation. In return, it also reveals opposite paths, i.e. those leading to its absence.Design/methodology/approachThe research method involves a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 65 Canadian manufacturing SMEs. Through necessity and sufficiency condition analysis procedures, this approach emphasizes the complexity of the digital transformation processes by revealing different sets (i.e. configurations) of what enable, or inhibit, organizational agility in these firms.FindingsThe findings indicate that manufacturing SMEs need to align at least one dynamic IT capability (sensing, learning, coordinating or integrating) and one operational IT capability (IT management, IT infrastructure or e-business) to be highly agile. In contrast, other findings indicate that there are suboptimal combinations of IT capabilities, which result in an absence of agility.Originality/valueThis study offers a deeper understanding of the complex interaction of IT capabilities in SMEs seeking greater agility in their business activities. Its contributions provide insights on the mobilization of a range of capabilities, both complementary and interdependent, to respond to changing conditions in their internal and external environments. These actionable findings can help various actors in the digital development of SMEs to design and implement effective IT strategies and public policies.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
|
Information and Management
7711 citations, 4.72%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
2815 citations, 1.72%
|
|
Sustainability
2813 citations, 1.72%
|
|
International Journal of Information Management
2307 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Internet Research
1586 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
1564 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Behaviour and Information Technology
1414 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Industrial Management and Data Systems
1383 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Information Technology and People
1372 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
1315 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
1284 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Decision Support Systems
1236 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
1187 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
1087 citations, 0.67%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
1055 citations, 0.65%
|
|
European Journal of Information Systems
887 citations, 0.54%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
873 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Information Systems Frontiers
848 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
762 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
758 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of Knowledge Management
711 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Telematics and Informatics
652 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
636 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Computer Information Systems
593 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Computers and Education
563 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Business Process Management Journal
528 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Information Systems Journal
527 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Online Information Review
524 citations, 0.32%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
497 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Strategic Information Systems
485 citations, 0.3%
|
|
IEEE Access
435 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
424 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Data Base for Advances in Information Systems
416 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
415 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Management Information Systems
406 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Computers and Security
403 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Information Technology
403 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Global Information Management
395 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Technology in Society
390 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Production Economics
381 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Information Development
380 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Electronic Commerce Research
368 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Bank Marketing
367 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
352 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
349 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
343 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Kybernetes
322 citations, 0.2%
|
|
SAGE Open
312 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Electronic Markets
305 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Heliyon
297 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Information Processing and Management
289 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
289 citations, 0.18%
|
|
PLoS ONE
286 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Management Decision
282 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
278 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Information and Software Technology
267 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Information Systems Research
267 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Global Information Technology Management
265 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
263 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Project Management
262 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Information Systems Management
259 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
245 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
243 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Government Information Quarterly
237 citations, 0.15%
|
|
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
235 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
234 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Systems and Software
230 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
230 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Decision Sciences
225 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Technovation
225 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Benchmarking
223 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
223 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
221 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Organizational and End User Computing
218 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Information Systems and e-Business Management
215 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Systems and Information Technology
215 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Business and Information Systems Engineering
214 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
211 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Aslib Journal of Information Management
211 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Omega
209 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Production Research
208 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Information and Computer Security
207 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
203 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research
199 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Internet Commerce
196 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
194 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce
192 citations, 0.12%
|
|
European Journal of Operational Research
191 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Knowledge Management Research and Practice
191 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
175 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Information Technology and Management
170 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Computers in Industry
162 citations, 0.1%
|
|
European Journal of Innovation Management
162 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
162 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Human Computer Studies
158 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Tourism Management
157 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Consumer Studies
157 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics
155 citations, 0.09%
|
|
International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems
154 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
151 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
|
|
Elsevier
39432 citations, 24.16%
|
|
Emerald
23069 citations, 14.13%
|
|
Springer Nature
19298 citations, 11.82%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
16953 citations, 10.39%
|
|
IGI Global
10930 citations, 6.7%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
10222 citations, 6.26%
|
|
MDPI
6608 citations, 4.05%
|
|
Wiley
6295 citations, 3.86%
|
|
SAGE
4986 citations, 3.05%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2874 citations, 1.76%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1714 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1175 citations, 0.72%
|
|
World Scientific
862 citations, 0.53%
|
|
JMIR Publications
841 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
649 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
507 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
506 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
406 citations, 0.25%
|
|
IOP Publishing
388 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Oxford University Press
319 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
279 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
251 citations, 0.15%
|
|
CAIRN
249 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
232 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IOS Press
222 citations, 0.14%
|
|
EDP Sciences
216 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Accounting Association
211 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
208 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AOSIS
204 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Science Alert
186 citations, 0.11%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
170 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IAE School of Management Montpellier University
160 citations, 0.1%
|
|
SciELO
157 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
155 citations, 0.09%
|
|
AIP Publishing
150 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
140 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
134 citations, 0.08%
|
|
BMJ
83 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
75 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academy of Management
71 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
70 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
67 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
65 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
64 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
61 citations, 0.04%
|
|
EJournal Publishing
59 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hans Publishers
59 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Quality
54 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
52 citations, 0.03%
|
|
PeerJ
51 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
48 citations, 0.03%
|
|
F1000 Research
48 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
47 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korea Contents Association
46 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
44 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
44 citations, 0.03%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
43 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
38 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Modestum Ltd
37 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
37 citations, 0.02%
|
|
32 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Journal of Information and Education Technology
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tech Science Press
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
OpenEdition
30 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Marketing Association
29 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
27 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
27 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
27 citations, 0.02%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
26 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Academy Publishing (IAP)
26 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
24 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
24 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
24 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society for Information Management
24 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles
23 citations, 0.01%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
22 citations, 0.01%
|
|
ASME International
22 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
21 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Editura Economica
21 citations, 0.01%
|
|
ASTM International
21 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Human Kinetics
21 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Engenharia de Producao - ABEPRO
21 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
20 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
19 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Brazilian Administration Review
18 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
16 citations, 0.01%
|
|
16 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Anadolu University, Faculty of Communication Sciences
16 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fakulteta za Organizacijske Vede, Univerza v Mariboru
16 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
15 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Intellect
15 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
15 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
15 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
14 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
14 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Marketing Academy
14 citations, 0.01%
|
|
EPI SCP
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
77 publications, 2.38%
|
|
National University of Singapore
70 publications, 2.16%
|
|
Georgia State University
39 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
34 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of New South Wales
32 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Minnesota
31 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Memphis
31 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of North Texas
29 publications, 0.89%
|
|
National Sun Yat-sen University
27 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Arizona
27 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Mississippi State University
25 publications, 0.77%
|
|
National Chung Cheng University
24 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Yonsei University
24 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
24 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
24 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Renmin University of China
23 publications, 0.71%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
23 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
23 publications, 0.71%
|
|
McMaster University
23 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Texas Tech University
23 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Tsinghua University
22 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Fudan University
22 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
22 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
22 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Texas at Arlington
22 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Zhejiang University
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Drexel University
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Florida International University
21 publications, 0.65%
|
|
National Chengchi University
20 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Korea University
20 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
20 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Miami University
20 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Virginia Tech
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of South Florida
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Houston
19 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
18 publications, 0.56%
|
|
National Taiwan University
18 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
18 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Auburn University
18 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Arizona State University
18 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Kentucky
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Colorado Colorado Springs
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Tianjin University
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Florida State University
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
National Central University
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Central Florida
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Tilburg University
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Brunel University London
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Queensland
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Clemson University
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Granada
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Nanjing University
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Sydney
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Nottingham Ningbo China
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Oakland University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of British Columbia
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Western University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Xiamen University
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Auckland
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Northeastern University
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
St. Cloud State University
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
South China University of Technology
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Wuhan University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Aalto University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Iowa State University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Syracuse University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Beihang University
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
George Mason University
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
McGill University
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Kansas State University
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
18 publications, 2.96%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
17 publications, 2.8%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
12 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Renmin University of China
12 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Sydney
11 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
11 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Tsinghua University
10 publications, 1.64%
|
|
University of New South Wales
10 publications, 1.64%
|
|
Tianjin University
10 publications, 1.64%
|
|
National University of Singapore
10 publications, 1.64%
|
|
University of Nottingham Ningbo China
10 publications, 1.64%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
10 publications, 1.64%
|
|
Zhejiang University
9 publications, 1.48%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
9 publications, 1.48%
|
|
Mississippi State University
9 publications, 1.48%
|
|
Wuhan University
8 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Xiamen University
8 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
8 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Florida International University
8 publications, 1.32%
|
|
South China University of Technology
7 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
7 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Virginia Tech
7 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Granada
7 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
6 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
6 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Texas at Arlington
6 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of North Texas
6 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Fudan University
5 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Beihang University
5 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
5 publications, 0.82%
|
|
National Sun Yat-sen University
5 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
5 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Georgia State University
5 publications, 0.82%
|
|
McMaster University
5 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Peking University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Tongji University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Sichuan University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Tampere University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Nankai University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Australian National University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Shenzhen University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of International Business and Economics
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Dongbei University of Finance and Economics
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
National Chengchi University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Melbourne
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Queensland
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of South Florida
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Bamberg
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Temple University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Wright State University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Tennessee
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Southeast University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Nanjing University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Aalto University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Northeastern University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Xidian University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Durham University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Shanghai International Studies University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Southern University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Manchester
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
National Chung Cheng University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Iowa State University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Auckland
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Southern Cross University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Korea University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
George Mason University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Cologne
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of British Columbia
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Minnesota Duluth
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Stevens Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Tilburg University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Lakehead University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Louisiana State University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Texas Tech University
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1369, 42.23%
USA
1369 publications, 42.23%
|
China
|
China, 664, 20.48%
China
664 publications, 20.48%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 155, 4.78%
Canada
155 publications, 4.78%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 148, 4.57%
Australia
148 publications, 4.57%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 140, 4.32%
United Kingdom
140 publications, 4.32%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 125, 3.86%
Republic of Korea
125 publications, 3.86%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 98, 3.02%
Singapore
98 publications, 3.02%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 89, 2.75%
Netherlands
89 publications, 2.75%
|
France
|
France, 72, 2.22%
France
72 publications, 2.22%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 68, 2.1%
Germany
68 publications, 2.1%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 49, 1.51%
Finland
49 publications, 1.51%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 45, 1.39%
Spain
45 publications, 1.39%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 43, 1.33%
Israel
43 publications, 1.33%
|
India
|
India, 37, 1.14%
India
37 publications, 1.14%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 35, 1.08%
Italy
35 publications, 1.08%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 31, 0.96%
New Zealand
31 publications, 0.96%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 22, 0.68%
Austria
22 publications, 0.68%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 19, 0.59%
Switzerland
19 publications, 0.59%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 18, 0.56%
Norway
18 publications, 0.56%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 16, 0.49%
Greece
16 publications, 0.49%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 16, 0.49%
Malaysia
16 publications, 0.49%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 16, 0.49%
South Africa
16 publications, 0.49%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 15, 0.46%
Belgium
15 publications, 0.46%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 14, 0.43%
Portugal
14 publications, 0.43%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 13, 0.4%
Denmark
13 publications, 0.4%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 13, 0.4%
Saudi Arabia
13 publications, 0.4%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 0.34%
Ireland
11 publications, 0.34%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 11, 0.34%
Japan
11 publications, 0.34%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 9, 0.28%
Turkey
9 publications, 0.28%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 7, 0.22%
Georgia
7 publications, 0.22%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 7, 0.22%
UAE
7 publications, 0.22%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 7, 0.22%
Sweden
7 publications, 0.22%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 6, 0.19%
Chile
6 publications, 0.19%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 5, 0.15%
Kuwait
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 5, 0.15%
Slovenia
5 publications, 0.15%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.12%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 4, 0.12%
Liechtenstein
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.09%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.09%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.09%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.09%
Iran
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.09%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.09%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.09%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.09%
Poland
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.06%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 2, 0.06%
Bahrain
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.06%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.06%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.06%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.06%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.06%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 2, 0.06%
Czechoslovakia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.03%
Russia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.03%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.03%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.03%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.03%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.03%
Oman
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.03%
Peru
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.03%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.03%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.03%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 1, 0.03%
Fiji
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.03%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.03%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 1, 0.03%
Yugoslavia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (37 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
China
|
China, 223, 36.68%
China
223 publications, 36.68%
|
USA
|
USA, 166, 27.3%
USA
166 publications, 27.3%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 45, 7.4%
Australia
45 publications, 7.4%
|
France
|
France, 30, 4.93%
France
30 publications, 4.93%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 29, 4.77%
Germany
29 publications, 4.77%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 28, 4.61%
United Kingdom
28 publications, 4.61%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 24, 3.95%
Canada
24 publications, 3.95%
|
India
|
India, 18, 2.96%
India
18 publications, 2.96%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 17, 2.8%
Singapore
17 publications, 2.8%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 12, 1.97%
Spain
12 publications, 1.97%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 12, 1.97%
Republic of Korea
12 publications, 1.97%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 11, 1.81%
Netherlands
11 publications, 1.81%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 11, 1.81%
Finland
11 publications, 1.81%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 10, 1.64%
Italy
10 publications, 1.64%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 8, 1.32%
Austria
8 publications, 1.32%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 6, 0.99%
Portugal
6 publications, 0.99%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 6, 0.99%
Denmark
6 publications, 0.99%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 6, 0.99%
New Zealand
6 publications, 0.99%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 6, 0.99%
Norway
6 publications, 0.99%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 5, 0.82%
Switzerland
5 publications, 0.82%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.66%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.66%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.66%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.66%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.49%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.49%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 0.49%
South Africa
3 publications, 0.49%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.33%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.33%
Israel
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.33%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.33%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.16%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.16%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.16%
Greece
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.16%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.16%
Iran
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.16%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 1, 0.16%
Liechtenstein
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.16%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.16%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.16%
UAE
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.16%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.16%
Peru
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.16%
Poland
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.16%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.16%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.16%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.16%
Japan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Show all (14 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
10 profile journal articles
Turel Ofir

University of Melbourne
232 publications,
8 071 citations
h-index: 46
5 profile journal articles
Sherif Karma
23 publications,
438 citations
h-index: 11
1 profile journal article
Emrouznejad Ali

University of Surrey
235 publications,
8 566 citations
h-index: 50