Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q4
Impact factor
1.5
SJR
0.584
CiteScore
5.2
Categories
Biophysics
Organic Chemistry
Biochemistry
Biomaterials
Areas
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemistry
Materials Science
Years of issue
2018-2025
journal names
Peptide Science
PEPTIDE SCI
Top-3 citing journals

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
(71 citations)

Molecules
(55 citations)

Chemical Science
(42 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Padua
(12 publications)

Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry
(7 publications)

University of Naples Federico II
(6 publications)

University of Edinburgh
(5 publications)

University of Queensland
(5 publications)

University of Glasgow
(4 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 5199
Q1

Treetop: topology optimization using constructive solid geometry trees
Kumar Padhy R., Thombre P., Suresh K., Chandrasekhar A.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Integrating moving morphable components and plastic layout optimization: a two-stage approach for enhanced structural topology optimization
Lotfalian A., Esmaeilpour P., Yoon G.H., Takalloozadeh M.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Simultaneous node-based shape and thickness optimization of thin-walled structures using the explicit Vertex Morphing method
Schmölz D., Devresse B., Geiser A., Bletzinger K.
Abstract
Node-based shape optimization has been successfully and consistently formulated via shape and sensitivity filtering methods. This work studies the union of the Vertex Morphing method, a shape parameterization technique that uses an explicit shape filtering approach, and shell thickness optimization. On this occasion, thickness variables are explicitly filtered similarly to the shape, but their filter is computed on the initial geometry configuration throughout the optimization. The problem is formulated such that both design variable types are optimized concurrently. Gradient-based algorithms are employed to solve the optimization problem, which have proven well suited for the Vertex Morphing method. Due to the different dimensionalities of the shape and thickness variables, a design variable scaling method between the two types is proposed, improving the convergence behavior without the necessity of second-order information. Academic examples and the application of a structure with industrial significance illustrate the method’s success.
Q1

Connectivity-driven topology optimization for path-following compliant mechanism: a formulation with predictive volume constraints and adaptive strategies for gray element suppression
Zhang L., Koppen S., van Keulen F.
Abstract
We propose a topology optimization (TO) formulation and related optimization scheme for designing compliant mechanisms following a user-defined trajectory. To ensure the broad applicability and achieve precisely control of the outputs, geometric nonlinearity with incremental solutions are considered. A challenge in the design optimization of these structures is the development of formulations with satisfactory balance between (i) precise trajectory control and (ii) proper connectivity between the input/output ports and the support. Previously proposed density-based topology optimization formulations typically lack the promotion of the desired load-transferring connections, or usually complicate the design using mixed shape, size, and topology variables to enforce a minimum connectivity. To simplify design progress using exclusive topology variables, i.e., purely density-based TO methods, we propose a relatively straightforward formulation involving commonly used response functions, such as compliance and volume as constraints. For the constraints, the paper provides a scheme for defining corresponding upper limits. Numerical examples of challenging shell and plate design optimization problems demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed formulation and scheme in the generation of load-transferring connections while limiting the impact on the performance of the path generation functionality.
Q1

Multiscale structural concurrent fail-safe topology optimization
Ding W., Jia H., Xu P., Zhang Y., Cheng F.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Minimum size control for binary topology optimization
Cortez R.L., Setta M., Picelli R., Wadbro E.
Abstract
Topology optimization methods employing binary (also known as discrete) design variables currently lack mathematical formulations to ensure length scale control in their solutions. This paper proposes and applies a morphology-mimicking filtering scheme to provide a minimum size control (often also referred to as minimum length scale control) in this class of binary designs. The Topology Optimization of Binary Structures (TOBS) method was chosen as the foundational framework for this length scale control study. Thermal and structural compliance scenarios were explored under this approach. Numerical results show that the proposed filter efficiently imposes the desired minimum length scale. The optimized designs were also less dependent on the filtering parameters when compared to designs optimized using standard techniques that employ continuous design variables.
Q1

Automatic projection parameter increase for three-field density-based topology optimization
Dunning P., Wein F.
Abstract
A method is proposed to automatically increase the threshold projection parameter in three-field density-based topology optimization to achieve near binary designs. The three-field method is composed of an element-wise design density field that is filtered and then passed through a smooth threshold projection function to compute the projected density field, which is then used to compute element properties, e.g., using a power law for stiffness. The sharpness of the threshold projection function is controlled by a parameter
$$\beta $$
β
. In this paper, a method is introduced to automatically increase this parameter during optimization by linking it to the change in objective function. Furthermore, the gray value indicator is added as a stopping criterion to guarantee the solution is near binary. This results in a method that does not need to be tuned for specific problems, or optimizers, and the same set of user-defined parameters can be used for a wide range of problems. However, a high value of the threshold projection parameter may cause convergence issues for some optimizers, such as the optimally criteria method, and an adaptive move limit strategy is introduced to overcome this problem. It is also shown that some problems require length-scale control to achieve a near binary design. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated on several benchmark problems, including linear compliance, linear buckling, compliant mechanism, heat conduction, and geometrically nonlinear problems.
Q1

A sequential linear programming approach for truss optimization based on the uncertainty analysis-based data-driven computational mechanics (UA-DDCM)
Huang M., Du Z., Liu C., Zhang W., Guo X.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Topology optimization for pressurized nonlinear structures using substructure and experimental studies
Lu Y., Luo Q., Tong L.
Abstract
A compliant structure under fluidic pressure can undergo relatively large shape change, but the design of such type of structure is challenging as the pressure distribution depends on detailed structural geometry. In this study, a novel mixed substructure-density (MSD) model is proposed for topology representation and update in the optimal design of nonlinear compliant structures under quasi-static fluidic pressure. An optimization algorithm is developed via implementing the present model by using super-elements in commercial finite element analysis (FEA) software. Numerical examples are presented to validate the present model, algorithm, and designs numerically via full linear and nonlinear FEAs. A planar cellular network with five cells arranged in parallel is then designed for representing a pressurized wing rib structure capable of modulating airfoil thickness variation. The test results of the single-cell and five-cell PCS specimens prototyped using polyurethane material show that the respective cell thickness can be reduced by 11.9 and 6.4% respectively under a cell pressure of 250 kPa.
Q1

Constructability-based multi-objective optimization with machine learning-enhanced meta-heuristics for reinforcing bar design in rectangular concrete columns
Verduzco L.F.
Abstract
Optimization of reinforcing bar (rebar) design represents a preponderant factor in reducing material usage and wastes for reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The assessment of constructability of such rebar designs is crucial to improve their practicality and reduce construction costs, which makes the problem multi-objective (MO). However, when applying optimization methods for the design of rebar in RC structures, little attention has been paid on columns, in comparison to beams and slabs. Meta-heuristic algorithms (MA) have been the ones mostly deployed for these types of elements, which have proven to be of high computational cost. Additionally, an existing gap in the literature as to how to relate the design and construction stage of rebar in RC structures through constructability analysis is evident. In this regard, research has been focused mainly at the building level but not at the element level. This works presents a novel algorithmic framework using Machine Learning (ML)-enhanced meta-heuristics for the optimal design of rebar on rectangular RC columns. To assess the constructability of the resulting rebar layouts a Buildability Score (BS) model at the element level is proposed. The complexity analysis of rebar design under the constructability restrictions, through combinatorial optimization (CO), is used to assess the global time efficiency of the framework. The Non-Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) was deployed for showcase and five different ML algorithms were used to enhance it, namely the k-NN classifier, SVM regression, ANN, Gauss Process (GP) regression, and Tree Ensembles (TE), where the latter three showed the best performance.
Q1

Density-based hole seeding in XFEM level-set topology optimization of fluid problems
Høghøj L.C., Andreasen C.S., Maute K.
Abstract
The optimization results of level-set methods typically suffer from a strong dependence on the initial design. To mitigate this dependence, this work presents a density-based hole nucleation method for level-set topology optimization of flow problems. This is achieved by defining both the level-set and density values as functions of the design variables. To preserve the crispness of the geometry definition afforded by the level-set method, the fluid flow is modeled using the Heaviside enriched eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) for the laminar incompressible Navier–Stokes equation, which is augmented by a Brinkman model. The boundary conditions are enforced weakly using Nitsche’s method. A face-oriented ghost stabilization scheme is applied to stabilize the XFEM formulation. Additional terms ensuring stability are added to Nitsche’s method and the ghost stabilization to account for the Brinkman term in the Navier–Stokes equation. The necessity of adding these terms is highlighted by numerical studies. Two- and three-dimensional fluid manifolds are optimized to minimize fluid power dissipation while achieving a predefined mass flow distribution among the outlets. The optimization results show that the proposed method bypasses the need for an initial hole seeding and speeds up the convergence of the optimization process.
Q1

Topology optimization of beams’ cross-sectional properties considering torsional and warping behavior
Kostopoulos C., Marzok A., Waisman H.
This paper introduces a novel efficient topology optimization methodology for beams’ torsion using the warping function formulation. The finite element method is used to discretize the cross-section and an efficient gradient-based optimization problem is formulated to optimize the relevant parameters corresponding to the torsion and warping constants of the beam. As a result, for the first time, one can optimize a beam for problems where the warping behavior is dominant. Density-based optimization is defined where the SIMP approach is utilized to penalize intermediate element densities. A key challenge of the optimization that arises in the warping function framework is the design-dependent nature of the problem. That is, the forcing vector varies during the optimization as it depends on the cross-section boundaries, which are functions of the updating topology. To this end, a differentiable boundary recognition algorithm is proposed. The methodology is applied to design beam cross-sections in which both torsion and warping constants are of interest. While intuitive topologies are obtained in the case of optimized torsion constant, this is not the case for the warping constant. The latter shows unique material distributions and a special dependence on the allowable material density.
Q1

Uncertainty-based multi-disciplinary multi-objective design optimization of unmanned mining electric shovel
Hu Z., Long X., Lian K., Lin S., Song X.
Electric shovel (ES) is a large mining equipment crucial for energy security. The traditional design of the structure and control system of ES is carried out in stages, and the influence of the structural uncertainty for the system is not considered, which makes it difficult to obtain the optimal parameters of the system. Facing the demand of intelligent development, ES designed using traditional deterministic methods is difficult to meet the working demand of unmanned mining electric shovel (UMES). To address these challenges, this paper proposes an uncertainty-based multidisciplinary multi-objective optimization (UMMO) framework for UMES. Within this framework, the mechanical structure of the front-end mechanism was analyzed, excavation trajectories were planned based on a polynomial point-to-point motion strategy, and models for the excavation resistance of the dipper and the dynamical model of the front-end working device were constructed. Then, optimization objective functions were constructed with excavation energy consumption, excavation efficiency, and full dipper rate as targets. By analyzing the working characteristics of UMES, essential constraints were introduced for the mechanical system, control system and hardware. The UMMO optimization model was established to enhance the reliability of the UMES production process. Finally, the mechanical structure dimensions and control system parameters are optimized to generate the optimal physical structure and excavation trajectory considering uncertainties. The numerical results show that compared with the deterministic optimization results, the optimized structure of the proposed UMMO strategy is more compact and the mechanical structure is more reliable in the production process.
Q1

A collaborative adaptive Kriging-based algorithm for the reliability analysis of nested systems
Ye K., Wang H., Ma X.
Complex engineering systems that involve multiple disciplines or scales are often decomposed into multiple subsystems in a nested or hierarchical manner to enhance the analysis efficiency. However, uncertainties inherent in input parameters will propagate with hierarchy, and severely threaten the reliability of engineering systems. Adaptive surrogate modeling technique is a potent tool to alleviate the computational burden of reliability analysis, especially involving time-consuming computer experiments. Conventional black-box adaptive surrogate modeling framework did not incorporate nested characteristic, which is inefficient for the reliability analysis of complex systems with nested or hierarchical characteristics. This paper develops a collaborative adaptive Kriging-based algorithm for the reliability analysis of nested systems. First, we propose a nested U-function to propel the adaptive updating of underlying Kriging models and derive its approximate closed form based on a defined most probable misclassification point. Then, an accuracy enhancement stage is devised to compensate for the inaccuracies of first-order approximation in early iterations. A parallel radius-based importance sampling technique is presented to mitigate the computational effort at multiple candidates. Finally, an index considering the reduction of model uncertainty is exploited to quantify the contribution of individual Kriging model and select the to-be-refined Kriging model in one iteration. Through numerical examples and case studies, the superiority of the proposed methodology is comprehensively illustrated compared with other benchmark methods.
Q1

Discrete variable topology optimization using multi-cut formulation and adaptive trust regions
Ye Z., Pan W.
We present a new framework for efficiently solving general topology optimization (TO) problems that find an optimal material distribution within a design space to maximize the performance of a part or structure while satisfying design constraints. These problems can involve convex or non-convex objective functions and may include multiple candidate materials. The framework is designed to greatly enhance computational efficiency, primarily by diminishing optimization iteration counts and thereby reducing the frequency of solving associated state equilibrium partial differential equations (PDEs) (e.g., through the finite element method (FEM)). It maintains binary design variables and addresses the large-scale mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem that arises from discretizing the design space and PDEs. The core of this framework is the integration of the generalized Benders’ decomposition and adaptive trust regions. Specifically, by formulating the master sub-problem (decomposed from the MINLP) as a multi-cut optimization problem and enabling the estimation of the upper and lower bounds of the original objective function, significant acceleration in solution convergence is achieved. The trust region radius adapts based on a merit function. To mitigate ill-conditioning due to extreme parameter values, we further introduce a parameter relaxation scheme where two parameters are relaxed in stages at different paces, improving both solution quality and efficiency. Numerical tests validate the framework’s superior performance, including minimum compliance and compliant mechanism problems in single-material and multi-material designs. We compare our results with those of other methods and demonstrate significant reductions in optimization iterations (and therefore the number of FEM analyses required) by about one order of magnitude, while maintaining comparable optimal objective function values and material layouts. As the design variables and constraints increase, the framework maintains consistent solution quality and efficiency, underscoring its good scalability. We anticipate this framework will be especially advantageous for TO applications involving substantial design variables and constraints and requiring significant computational resources for FEM analyses (or PDE solving).
Top-100
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
71 citations, 3.12%
|
|
Molecules
55 citations, 2.42%
|
|
Chemical Science
42 citations, 1.85%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
39 citations, 1.72%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
39 citations, 1.72%
|
|
Chemistry - A European Journal
37 citations, 1.63%
|
|
Antibiotics
30 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Pharmaceutics
30 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Peptide Science
30 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
28 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
27 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Journal of Organic Chemistry
27 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
25 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Biomacromolecules
25 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Journal of Peptide Science
24 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Chemical Communications
23 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Organic Letters
22 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
21 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Frontiers in Chemistry
20 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
20 citations, 0.88%
|
|
ChemBioChem
19 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
19 citations, 0.84%
|
|
ACS Infectious Diseases
18 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Biomolecules
18 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Chemical Society Reviews
18 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Langmuir
17 citations, 0.75%
|
|
ACS Chemical Biology
16 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Amino Acids
16 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
16 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Scientific Reports
15 citations, 0.66%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
14 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Soft Matter
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
ACS Omega
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Marine Drugs
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Bioconjugate Chemistry
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Biomembranes
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
RSC Medicinal Chemistry
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Nanoscale
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Nature Communications
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
ACS Applied Bio Materials
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Cancers
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Australian Journal of Chemistry
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Biomaterials Science
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Biomedicines
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Frontiers in Medical Technology
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Microorganisms
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
CrystEngComm
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Biochemistry
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Communications Biology
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
ChemPlusChem
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Cells
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Communications Chemistry
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
RSC Advances
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Organic Chemistry Frontiers
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Nanomaterials
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Chemistry - An Asian Journal
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Organic Process Research and Development
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
ACS Nano
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Carbohydrate Polymers
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Heliyon
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Advanced healthcare materials
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Accounts of Chemical Research
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Catalysts
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Biophysical Journal
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Advanced Science
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
ACS Central Science
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
iScience
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Citing publishers
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
391 citations, 17.19%
|
|
Wiley
352 citations, 15.48%
|
|
Elsevier
344 citations, 15.13%
|
|
MDPI
318 citations, 13.98%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
254 citations, 11.17%
|
|
Springer Nature
208 citations, 9.15%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
95 citations, 4.18%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
37 citations, 1.63%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
37 citations, 1.63%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
30 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Oxford University Press
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
AIP Publishing
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Portland Press
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IntechOpen
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
PeerJ
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
SAGE
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Royal Society
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Science in China Press
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute of Biochemistry
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
World Scientific
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Physiological Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
King Saud University
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Higher Education Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Microbiology Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Nuclear Medicine
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
The Society of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Japan
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Biophysical Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Kemerovo State University
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Annual Reviews
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
S. Karger AG
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Newlands Press Ltd
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
International Society for Nutraceuticals & Functional Foods (ISNFF)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Acta Naturae Ltd
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
European Society for Artificial Organs (ESAO)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Fiber Science & Technology Japan
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Show all (47 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
University of Padua
12 publications, 3.74%
|
|
Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry
7 publications, 2.18%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
6 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Monash University
6 publications, 1.87%
|
|
University of Queensland
6 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
5 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
5 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of Toronto
5 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
4 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
4 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Glasgow
4 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Melbourne
4 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of British Columbia
4 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Purdue University
4 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Australian National University
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Oxford
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Florence
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Institute of Crystallography
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Auckland
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Australian Research Council
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Translational Research Institute
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
New York University
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Université Laval
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Louisiana State University
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Rochester
3 publications, 0.93%
|
|
King Saud University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Peking University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Lisbon
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Bologna
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Cambridge
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Jiangsu University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Sydney
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Catania
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Parma
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Salerno
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Curtin University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Flinders University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
James Cook University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Yonsei University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Korea University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Korea Basic Science Institute
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Technical University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Chicago
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Kyoto University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Academy of Athens
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Agency for Science, Technology and Research
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Istituto Pasteur in Italy
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Assam Royal Global University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Scripps Research
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Leipzig University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Leeds
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Osaka Metropolitan University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Delaware
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
National Cancer Institute
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Hospital for Sick Children
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
GlaxoSmithKline
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
2 publications, 0.62%
|
|
![]() Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
National university of Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
A.S.Sadykov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Alfaisal University
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
King Faisal University
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Prince Sultan Military Medical City
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Tirupati
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Jawaharlal Nehru University
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Arunachal Pradesh
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Isfahan
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University
1 publication, 0.31%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
University of Edinburgh
5 publications, 2.44%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 2.44%
|
|
University of Glasgow
4 publications, 1.95%
|
|
Purdue University
4 publications, 1.95%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
3 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Australian Research Council
3 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Translational Research Institute
3 publications, 1.46%
|
|
King Saud University
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Yonsei University
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Korea University
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Korea Basic Science Institute
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Chicago
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Academy of Athens
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Agency for Science, Technology and Research
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Assam Royal Global University
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Scripps Research
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Louisiana State University
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
GlaxoSmithKline
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
National university of Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
A.S.Sadykov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Alfaisal University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
King Faisal University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Prince Sultan Military Medical City
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Arunachal Pradesh
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Isfahan
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Central University of Tamil Nadu
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Yeditepe University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Dumlupinar University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Shahrekord University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Shanmugha Arts, Science, Technology & Research Academy
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Rajiv Gandhi University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Damghan university
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Central University of Rajasthan
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Peking University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Yenepoya University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
NITTE University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Dibrugarh University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Mangalore University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Nanjing Forestry University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Capital Medical University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Ocean University of China
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Beijing Technology and Business University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Hunan Normal University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Padua
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Jiangsu University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Nottingham
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Southampton
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Florence
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Catania
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Salerno
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Institute of Crystallography
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Chieti-Pescara
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of Auckland
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Monash University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
James Cook University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
University of KwaZulu-Natal
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Seoul National University
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
USA
|
USA, 69, 21.5%
USA
69 publications, 21.5%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 33, 10.28%
Italy
33 publications, 10.28%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 29, 9.03%
Australia
29 publications, 9.03%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 28, 8.72%
Canada
28 publications, 8.72%
|
India
|
India, 26, 8.1%
India
26 publications, 8.1%
|
China
|
China, 22, 6.85%
China
22 publications, 6.85%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 21, 6.54%
United Kingdom
21 publications, 6.54%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 13, 4.05%
Brazil
13 publications, 4.05%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 13, 4.05%
Republic of Korea
13 publications, 4.05%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 11, 3.43%
Germany
11 publications, 3.43%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 10, 3.12%
Japan
10 publications, 3.12%
|
France
|
France, 9, 2.8%
France
9 publications, 2.8%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 4, 1.25%
Spain
4 publications, 1.25%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 1.25%
Poland
4 publications, 1.25%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 1.25%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 1.25%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.93%
Russia
3 publications, 0.93%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.93%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.93%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.93%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.93%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 0.93%
Netherlands
3 publications, 0.93%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.93%
New Zealand
3 publications, 0.93%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.93%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.93%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.62%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.62%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.62%
Greece
2 publications, 0.62%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.62%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.62%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.62%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.62%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.62%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.62%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.31%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.31%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.31%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.31%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.31%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.31%
Iran
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.31%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.31%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.31%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.31%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.31%
Romania
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 1, 0.31%
Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.31%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.31%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.31%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.31%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.31%
|
Show all (11 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
USA
|
USA, 51, 24.88%
USA
51 publications, 24.88%
|
China
|
China, 18, 8.78%
China
18 publications, 8.78%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 17, 8.29%
United Kingdom
17 publications, 8.29%
|
India
|
India, 17, 8.29%
India
17 publications, 8.29%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 11, 5.37%
Republic of Korea
11 publications, 5.37%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 10, 4.88%
Brazil
10 publications, 4.88%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 9, 4.39%
Australia
9 publications, 4.39%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 7, 3.41%
Japan
7 publications, 3.41%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 2.44%
Italy
5 publications, 2.44%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 4, 1.95%
Germany
4 publications, 1.95%
|
France
|
France, 4, 1.95%
France
4 publications, 1.95%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 1.95%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 1.95%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 1.46%
Canada
3 publications, 1.46%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 1.46%
Turkey
3 publications, 1.46%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.98%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.98%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.98%
Greece
2 publications, 0.98%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.98%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.98%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.98%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.98%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.98%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.98%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.98%
Poland
2 publications, 0.98%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.98%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.98%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.98%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.98%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.49%
Russia
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.49%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.49%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.49%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.49%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.49%
Iran
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.49%
Spain
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.49%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.49%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.49%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.49%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 1, 0.49%
Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.49%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.49%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.49%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.49%
|
Show all (5 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|