Journal of Economic Methodology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
1.7
SJR
0.873
CiteScore
3.2
Categories
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Areas
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Years of issue
1994-2025
journal names
Journal of Economic Methodology
J ECON METHODOL
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Economic Methodology
(862 citations)

SSRN Electronic Journal
(776 citations)

Synthese
(152 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Helsinki
(34 publications)

Erasmus University Rotterdam
(27 publications)

University of Cape Town
(16 publications)

University of Helsinki
(9 publications)

London School of Economics and Political Science
(6 publications)

University of Cape Town
(4 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 274
Q4

Lung cancer diagnosis from computed tomography scans using convolutional neural network architecture with Mavage pooling technique
Abe A., Nyathi M., Okunade A.
<sec><title>Background</title><p>Lung cancer is a deadly disease. An early diagnosis can significantly improve the patient survival and quality of life. One potential solution is using deep learning (DL) algorithms to automate the diagnosis using patient computed tomography (CT) scans. However, the limited availability of training data and the computational complexity of existing algorithms, as well as their reliance on high-performance systems, limit the potential of DL algorithms. To improve early lung cancer diagnoses, this study proposes a low-cost convolutional neural network (CNN) that uses a Mavage pooling technique to diagnose lung cancers.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>The DL-based model uses five convolution layers with two residual connections and Mavage pooling layers. We trained the CNN using two publicly available datasets comprised of the IQ_OTH/NCCD dataset and the chest CT scan dataset. Additionally, we integrated the Mavage pooling in the AlexNet, ResNet-50, and GoogLeNet architectures to analyze the datasets. We evaluated the performance of the models based on accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The CNN model achieved a 99.70% accuracy and a 99.66% AUROC when the scans were classified as either cancerous or non-cancerous. It achieved a 90.24% accuracy and a 94.63% AUROC when the scans were classified as containing either normal, benign, or malignant nodules. It achieved a 95.56% accuracy and a 99.37% AUROC when lung cancers were classified. Additionally, the results indicated that the diagnostic abilities of AlexNet, ResNet-50, and GoogLeNet were improved with the introduction of the Mavage pooling technique.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>This study shows that a low-cost CNN can effectively diagnose lung cancers from patient CT scans. Utilizing Mavage pooling technique significantly improves the CNN diagnostic capabilities.</p></sec>
Q4

Viral load dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in the moderately symptomatic COVID-19 patients in Dak Lak, Viet Nam, 2021
Vien C.C., Van Le T., Nguyen V.T., Hoang T.N., Nay P.
<p>COVID-19 vaccines reduce infection, disease severity, and death by SARS-CoV-2 by reducing viral load. This study aimed to evaluate the change of cycle threshold (Ct) value in COVID-19 patients and investigate factors related to the Ct value change on the 3rd (D3), 7th (D7), 10th (D10), and 14th (D14) day after hospital admission in Dak Lak in 2021. Nasopharyngeal swabs and serum samples were obtained from 251 COVID-19 patients. Samples were collected on D3, D7, D10, and D14 after hospital admission and tested for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time RT-PCR tests. Ct values were categorized as <italic>high viral load</italic>, <italic>moderate viral</italic>, and <italic>low viral load</italic>. Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay was used to estimate the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The results demonstrated that vaccinated individuals against COVID-19 have a faster rate of hospital discharge than the unvaccinated group, most clearly on D10. The Ct change on D10 of vaccinated individuals was statistically significantly higher (1.35 times) than of unvaccinated individuals (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01). The mean Ct values of unvaccinated individuals on D3, D7, D10, and D14 were lower than that of vaccinated individuals. However, there was a statistically significant increase in Ct of vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals only on D10 and D14 (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.03). The percentage of Ct value ≥ 30 and negative of vaccinated persons on D7 (60.9%) was similar to that of unvaccinated persons on D10 (59.4%) (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05). Vaccinated individuals at hospital admission with Ct ≤ 20 on D1 had a statistically significant decline in viral load on D10 and D14, 1.55 and 1.30 times higher compared to unvaccinated individuals (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). The percentage of Ct ≥ 30 was significantly higher in males than females, especially on D7 and D14 with PR = 1.26 and 1.11 (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). In conclusion, individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 had reduced transmission by a significant decline in viral load and recovered faster than unvaccinated individuals.</p>
Q4

A case-control study on cervical cancer screening outcome and HPV vaccination among young women in the Italian area of Udine
Valent F., Moretti V.
The age for starting cervical cancer screening for women who were fully vaccinated against human papilloma virus (HPV) in adolescence could be increased from 25 to 30 years. In Italy, some regional governments have revised their screening programs accordingly, though others haven't. Local data on the effectiveness of the HPV vaccine may be helpful in encouraging updates in the screening protocols. We conducted a case-control study based on routine-collected anonymized administrative health data to evaluate the outcomes of first round cervical screening in women living in the Udine area of Italy, according to their vaccinal status. In the study, we included women born between 1993 and 1997, those that were living in the Udine area from 2008 to 2022, and those that participated in the regional cervical cancer screening program for at least one round from 2018 to 2022 (n = 2191). Of these women, 850 had been fully vaccinated before 15 years of age, 887 were vaccinated at age 15 or later, 39 were incompletely vaccinated, and 415 had never been vaccinated. 2140 women had a negative pap-test result and 51 had some type of non-normal result. The odds ratio for having a non-negative result was 0.23 for vaccinated vs non-vaccinated women (95% confidence interval 0.13–0.40). Only 0.2% of vaccinated women had CIN2+ lesions compared to 1.0% of CIN2 and 2.6% of CIN3 of non-vaccinated women (odds ratio of CIN2+ was 0.10, 95% confidence interval 0.04–0.26). The first invitation to the regional cervical cancer screening could be delayed in women who were vaccinated against HPV.
Q4

Integrative child psychotherapy: discussion of a common core and unified theory approach
Tattersall T.C., Rolli N., Butwell M.
This paper explored significant advancements in integrative child psychotherapy in the UK, aiming to establish a common core and unified theory. Informed by infant-parent observations, attachment theory, neuroscience, and socio-cognitive developmental psychology research, the findings integrated clinical approaches from a developmental and family systems perspective. The objective was to provide a framework based on common factors and a unified psychogenesis theory, emphasising a therapeutic action model and understanding child development. The escalating prevalence and severity of mental health issues among children and young people (CYP) are highlighted, with factors like the COVID-19 pandemic, educational disruptions, increased digital reliance, and the current cost of living crisis contributing to the surge. The impact of these changes necessitates a holistic approach to mental health care, specifically by specialists in integrative child psychotherapy. Current data underestimates CYP mental health needs due to the absence of a national approach to data collection and analysis. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus on the assessment and case formulation in CYP mental health treatment. The diversity in practitioners' approaches, training, and understanding of child development, evidence-based practices, and CYP mental health support is noted. Critiquing the limitations of evidence-based practices, the paper argues for a systematic assessment and case formulation framework. It advocates for an evidence base that acknowledges the individuality of CYP, emphasising psychotherapy's dynamic, relational foundation. The proposed framework seeks to inform training and practice requirements, challenging the conventional mechanistic understanding of mental health treatment and promoting a more integrative and client-centred approach.
Q4

Augmented therapeutic tutoring in diligent image-assisted robotic interventions
Razek A.
This paper concerns the aptitudes of medical staff to explore new therapies and training exercises for image-assisted robotic diligent interventions. This exploration can be carried out using physical, digital, or both copies of patients. Such physical and digital phantoms should approximate real living tissues through realistic biological properties. Such a realistic assessment could be achieved through strategies to reduce physical and numerical uncertainties. The concept of physical-virtual matched pairs is used in image-assisted robotic interventions to enable such reduction. The present commentary aimed to analyze and illustrate possibilities for increasing the capabilities of medical personnel to explore new therapies and training exercises for image-assisted robotic diligent interventions. In this context, the manuscript focused on the use of the physical-virtual digital twin (DT) concept to monitor image-assisted robotic interventions, thereby reducing the complexity and uncertainties involved in such a procedure. Extensions involve robotic operations assisted by human-in-the-loop DT, artificial intelligence (AI), and augmented reality (AR). The various topics covered in this commentary are supported by a review of the literature.
Q4

Moving the needle forward in health disparities: An education initiative
Reddy S.B., Speer M.J., Todsen J., Mutyala S., Samadder N.J., Moreno G.G., Lewis Y.L., Omar F.M., Mishra S., Umar S.B.
<sec><b>Objective</b>This paper sought to evaluate the impact of a year-long Health Equity Curriculum (HEC) on the knowledge of health disparities, cross-cultural humility, and empathy among physicians, trainees, and research staff.</sec><sec><b>Background</b>There has been an increase in the inclusion of equity, cultural humility, and the social determinants of health into medical education at various levels. However, the frequency of this education is low and not well quantified or defined. The authors report the results of an education program, namely the HEC, on the knowledge of health disparities, cross-cultural humility, and empathy.</sec><sec><b>Materials and methods</b>The HEC was delivered between March 2020 and May 2021. It included the following four modules: the social determinants of health, cultural humility, health literacy, and unconscious bias. The participants attended lectures and reviewed articles/videos using online modules and reflection assignments. The Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) and the Cross-Cultural Competence Instrument for Health Care Professionals (CCCHP) were administered pre- and post-HEC. The results were statistically analyzed.</sec><sec><b>Results</b>Of the 102 enrolled participants, 46 completed the entire course. The JSE showed a statistically significant improvement in the empathy scores from pre-HEC to post-HEC (p &lt; 0.01). The CCCHP showed a significant improvement from pre-HEC to post-HEC total scores and in subcomponent scores of Motivation/Curiosity, Attitude, and Knowledge (p &lt; 0.05). There were no significant differences in scores for the Skills and Emotions/Empathy subcomponents.</sec><sec><b>Conclusions</b>Enrollment and completion in the HEC were associated with statistically significant improvements in the validated measures of cultural competence and empathy. Scaling this type of content and curriculum can educate professionals on equity and serving diverse communities. A further study is warranted.</sec>
Q4

Sitting time in different contexts in Austrian adolescents and association with weight status
Greier K., Drenowatz C., Greier C., Ruedl G., Riechelmann H.
<abstract>
<p>The detrimental effects of high amounts of sedentary time on various health outcomes have been well documented. Particularly among youth, there are many sedentary pursuits that compete with active leisure time choices, which contribute to a high prevalence of insufficiently active children and adolescents. Therefore, the present study examined the time spent in various sedentary behaviors and the association with body weight in Austrian adolescents. Sedentary time was assessed with the “Heidelberg Questionnaire to Record the Sitting Behavior of Children and Adolescents” for 1225 (49.8% male) middle- and high-school students between 11 and 17 years of age. Their body weights and heights were measured with participants wearing gym clothes. The weight categories were established based on body mass index (BMI) percentiles using the German reference system. The average daily sedentary time across the entire sample was 12.0 ± 1.6 h, and 45% of the sedentary behaviors during the entire week were attributed to schoolwork. Normal weight participants reported a lower amount of sitting time compared to their overweight and obese peers, where they spent more time with physical activity and sleeping. Specifically, a higher body weight was associated with more time spent with recreational sedentary behaviors, while differences across the weight categories were limited for work-related sitting. Given the detrimental health effects of high amounts of sedentary behaviors, additional efforts are needed to promote physical activity in adolescents, particularly for those with an excess body weight. As almost half of the sedentary behaviors were attributed to work, schools could be a particularly viable setting for interventions that target an active lifestyle.</p>
</abstract>
Q4

Effects of melatonin on the management of multiple sclerosis: A scoping review on animal studies
Bandehagh H., Gozalpour F., Mousavi A., Ghavshough M.H.
<abstract><sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>Multiple sclerosis (MS), is a debilitating neurological disease that currently has various treatments, like disease-modifying therapies, monoclonal antibodies, corticosteroids, and hormonal derivatives. Melatonin has several actions, like regulating circadian rhythms, which are usually used for insomnia. This scoping review aimed to explore the efficacy of melatonin, both as a standalone treatment and in conjunction with other drugs, in the management of MS in animal models.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar using (“melatonin” OR “melatonin receptor”) AND (“multiple sclerosis”) AND (“animal”). Animal studies that evaluated the effects of melatonin on the development, progression, and outcomes of MS were included. Human studies and other types of studies like case reports were excluded. We used narrative synthesis for reporting the results.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Overall, 21 studies were included, conducted on mice (n = 15) and rats (n = 6). Mostly, studies reported that melatonin led to normal circadian rhythms in animals. Melatonin in doses of both 50 and 100 mg/kg were useful in nociception latency. Melatonin in combination with other drugs like H-89, diisopropylamine dichloroacetate, gibberellins, and IFN-1β improved outcomes, while there was not improved cognition in combination with mesenchymal stem cells. In some tests, male subjects showed significantly better responses. There were controversial results regarding the effects of melatonin on cytokines, but overall, it led to a reduction in proinflammatory cytokines.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Melatonin overall demonstrated favorable outcomes regarding oxidative stress, anti-inflammation, and cytokine levels across various doses. It is recommended conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses with a larger number of primary studies to provide more comprehensive insights.</p>
</sec></abstract>
Q4

Satisfaction of telehealth implementation in a pediatric feeding clinic
Davidson R.D., Kramer R., Fleet S.
<abstract><sec>
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>Telehealth services became commonplace during the COVID-19 pandemic and were widely reported to improve access to medical care in a variety of settings. The primary aim of this study was to assess patient- and provider-reported satisfaction with telehealth services within a multidisciplinary outpatient program for children with feeding disorders.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Caregivers and healthcare providers who participated in telehealth multidisciplinary visits within an outpatient pediatric feeding disorders clinic between April and June 2020 completed an online survey that assessed their visit satisfaction. The visit completion rates of in-person 2019 and virtual 2020 visits were compared.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Thirty-six caregivers of children between 1-month and 8-years-old completed the survey. Caregivers indicated their overall satisfaction with telehealth services, finding it more convenient than seeing specialists in person. Caregivers demonstrated interest in continuing telehealth visits. Providers indicated being satisfied with the telehealth visits, with many noting that they were as effective as in-person visits. There was an increase in the number of in-person visits between 2019 compared to virtual visits in 2020, though there were no differences for the visit completion rates.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Both caregivers and providers were satisfied with the telehealth services and highlighted various benefits in response to open-ended questions. However, there were concerns with the lack of available anthropometric data and measurements. Although there were no differences in the no-show rates following the implementation of telehealth, there was a significant increase in the total number of completed visits. Telehealth visits are a crucial resource for caregivers and providers in multidisciplinary pediatric feeding clinics, yet enhancing anthropometric measurements is necessary to provide quality care.</p>
</sec></abstract>
Q4

Combined face-to-face and telerehabilitation physiotherapy management in a patient with chronic pain related to piriformis syndrome: A case report
Forner-Álvarez C., Cuenca-Martínez F., Sebastián-Martín A., Vidal-Quevedo C., Grande-Alonso M.
<abstract>
<p>Piriformis syndrome is characterised as being one of the possible causes of sciatic pain, as well as being a syndrome that tends to become chronic. Because of this, different types of treatments for both this syndrome and the associated pain it causes have been investigated over the years. Nowadays, the evidence increasingly favors treating chronic pain with a multimodal physiotherapy treatment based on a biobehavioral approach. This case report describes the physiotherapy intervention performed on a 44-year-old woman with chronic pain related to piriformis syndrome. The multimodal intervention lasted for 9 weeks with a total of 12 sessions and included manual therapy, therapeutic exercise, neural mobilization, and pain neuroscience education. Initially, the pain characteristics alongside somatosensory, motor-functional, and psychosocial factors were assessed. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, only the pain characteristics and psychosocial factors could be reassessed post intervention. Improvements in both pain characteristics and psychosocial factors were achieved, resulting in a better general condition of the patient. This case report suggests that a multimodal physiotherapy intervention adapted to telerehabilitation was an effective option to improve the pain symptoms and psychosocial factors in the reported patient during the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, this may be a treatment option in patients with chronic pain that are in a situation where face-to-face physiotherapy is not feasible.</p>
</abstract>
Q4

Recruitment strategies for cervical cancer screening in three Mediterranean low and middle-income countries: Albania, Montenegro, and Morocco
Camussi E., Jaramillo L., Castagno R., Dotti M., Ferrante G., Belakhel L., Khazraji Y.C., Ylli A., Filipi K., Ostojić Đ., Stanisic M., Bisanti L., Giordano L.
<abstract><sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Cervical cancer (CC) poses a substantial burden in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), where challenges in implementing effective screening programs and achieving high participation rates persist.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Aims</title>
<p>This study sought to compare different strategies for recruiting women for CC screening in Albania, Montenegro, and Morocco, and compared usual care (ongoing invitation method) with an alternative approach (intervention strategy).</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Within each country, the following comparisons were made: face-to-face (FF) invitations versus phone calls (PCs) in Albania, PCs versus letter invitations in Montenegro, and FF invitations to women attending healthcare centers versus a combined approach termed “Invitation made in Morocco” (utilizing PC and FF for hard-to-reach women) in Morocco. Questionnaires that assessed facilitators and barriers to participation were administered to women who either attended or refused screening.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>In Albania, significant differences in the examination coverage were observed between the invitation methods (PC: 46.1% vs. FF: 87.1%, p &lt; 0.01) and between the rural and urban settings (rural: 89.1% vs. urban: 76.3%, p &lt; 0.01). In Montenegro, the coverage varied based on the recruitment method (PC: 17.7% vs. letter invitation: 7.6%; p &lt; 0.01), the setting (urban: 28.3% vs. rural: 13.2%; p &lt; 0.01), and age (&lt;34 years: 10.9% vs. 34+: 9.6%, p &lt; 0.01). In Morocco, no significant differences were observed. Common screening facilitators included awareness of CC prevention and understanding the benefits of early diagnosis, while key barriers included a limited perception of personal CC risk and the fear of testing positive.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>FF appeared to be effective in promoting participation, but its broader implementation raised sustainability concerns. PC invitations proved feasible, albeit necessitating updates to population registries. Restricting FF contacts for hard-to-reach communities may enhance the affordability and equity.</p>
</sec></abstract>
Q4

Evaluation of the relationship between the prealbumin/fibrinogen ratio and diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Tel B.M., Tel R., Duman T., Bilgin S., Kaya H., Bardak H., Aktas G.
<abstract><sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Our aim was to compare the prealbumin/fibrinogen ratio (PFR) of diabetic patient populations with or without diabetic nephropathy.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>People with type 2 diabetes who attended the internal medicine outpatient clinic were enrolled in the study. Two groups were formed according to the proteinuria of the patients: Diabetic nephropathy and non-nephropathy group. Diabetic nephropathy was calculated using the mathematical formula of spot urine albumin/spot urine creatinine x100. Patients with proteinuria above 200 mg/g were considered to have nephropathy. PFR was simply calculated by dividing prealbumin by fibrinogen.</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>A total of 152 patients who attended our outpatient clinic were enrolled in the study. There were 68 patients in the diabetic nephropathy group and 84 in the non-nephropathy group. The prealbumin/fibrinogen ratios (PFR) were significantly lower in the nephropathic group [0.061 (0.02–0.16)] than the non-nephropathic group [0.0779 (0.01–0.75)] (p = 0.002).</p>
</sec><sec>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>We suggest that decreased levels of PFR can indicate diabetic nephropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.</p>
</sec></abstract>
Q4

Multimodal physiotherapy treatment based on a biobehavioral approach in a patient with chronic low back pain: A case report
Forner-Álvarez C., Cuenca-Martínez F., Moreno-Gómez-Toledano R., Vidal-Quevedo C., Grande-Alonso M.
<abstract>
<p>Low back pain and its chronification are among the most common causes of disabilities worldwide. This is why multiple interventions and treatment approaches have been investigated around this pathology in recent years. Currently, the evidence is increasingly leaning towards treating chronic low back pain with a treatment based on the patient's centered biopsychosocial model. This case report presents the evaluation and treatment of a 43-year-old woman with chronic low back pain using a multimodal physiotherapy based on a biobehavioral approach. In the physiotherapy intervention, the patient's pain characteristics and somatosensory, motor-functional, and affective-cognitive states were first evaluated. Subsequently, a multimodal treatment including therapeutic exercise, pain neuroscience education, and orthopedic manual and physical therapies was applied for a total of 14 sessions over a period of 9 weeks. Finally, a post-intervention evaluation and at the one-month follow-up were carried out, in which it was observed that the treatment had significantly improved the patient's symptomatology and their general state. This case suggests that a multimodal physiotherapy treatment based on a biobehavioral approach is an effective option to improve pain symptoms and somatosensory, motor-functional, and affective-cognitive aspects in the reported patient; therefore, a treatment of these characteristics may be an option for patients with chronic low back pain.</p>
</abstract>
Q4

Leukemoid reaction in paraplegic male with pressure injuries: A case report
Bilal M.
Leukemoid reaction is defined as leukocytosis of more than 50 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/µL of blood, which is a physiological response to stress or infections, as opposed to a primary blood malignancy (leukemia). It is seen in various conditions including sepsis, burns, and inflammatory states associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Here, we report a 40-year-old cachexic and paraplegic male who presented with a leukemoid reaction and pressure injuries at the gluteal region with a total leukocyte count (TLC) of 103 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/µL of blood and reactive thrombocytosis. A bone marrow (BM) examination revealed no malignancy. With the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, the TLC after two weeks at the time of discharge was reduced to 18.83 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/µL of blood and the patient was referred to surgical unit for further management of pressure injuries. BM examination is mandatory in patients with suspected malignancies; however, for bed-bound patients with longer durations, pressure injuries should be inspected and treated with broad spectrum antibiotics before performing invasive procedures such as a BM examination.
Q4

Enhancing cardiovascular disease prediction: A hybrid machine learning approach integrating oversampling and adaptive boosting techniques
Akinola S., Leelakrishna R., Varadarajan V.
<abstract>
<p>This study presents a novel approach to enhance cardiovascular disease prediction using a hybrid machine learning (ML) model. Leveraging on Synthetic Minority oversampling techniques (SMOTE) and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), we integrate these methods with prominent classifiers, including Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Extra Tree (ET). Focused on heart rate data as stress level indicators, our objective is to jointly predict cardiovascular disease, thereby addressing the global health challenge of early detection and accurate risk assessments. In response to class imbalance issues in cardiology databases, our hybrid model, which combines SMOTE and AdaBoost, demonstrates promising results. The inclusion of diverse classifiers, such as RF, XGBoost, and ET, enables the model to capture both linear and nonlinear relationships within the heart rate data, significantly enhancing the prediction accuracy. This powerful predictive tool empowers healthcare providers to identify individuals at a high risk for heart disease, thus facilitating timely interventions. This article underscores the pivotal role of ML and hybrid methodologies in advancing health research, particularly in cardiovascular disease prediction. By addressing the class imbalance and incorporating robust algorithms, our research contributes to the ongoing efforts to improve predictive modeling in healthcare. The findings presented here hold significance for medical practitioners and researchers striving for the early detection and prevention of cardiovascular diseases.</p>
</abstract>
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
Journal of Economic Methodology
862 citations, 9.14%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
776 citations, 8.23%
|
|
Synthese
152 citations, 1.61%
|
|
Cambridge Journal of Economics
140 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
134 citations, 1.42%
|
|
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
106 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Journal of Economic Issues
103 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Economics and Philosophy
101 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
87 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Review of Political Economy
83 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Journal of Evolutionary Economics
81 citations, 0.86%
|
|
History of Political Economy
80 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Journal of Institutional Economics
72 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
72 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Journal of the History of Economic Thought
70 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Revue de philosophie économique
69 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Erkenntnis
68 citations, 0.72%
|
|
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
66 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Voprosy Ekonomiki
55 citations, 0.58%
|
|
OEconomia
49 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology
48 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Philosophy of Science
47 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Review of Social Economy
42 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Ecological Economics
36 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Biology and Philosophy
36 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Behavioural Public Policy
35 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Review of Austrian Economics
33 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Economic Psychology
33 citations, 0.35%
|
|
The Journal of Socio-Economics
30 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Journal of Economics and Sociology
29 citations, 0.31%
|
|
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
28 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Advances in Austrian Economics
27 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Scientometrics
26 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Revue d'Economie Politique
25 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
25 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
24 citations, 0.25%
|
|
The Forum for Social Economics
23 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Economic Surveys
22 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Theory and Decision
21 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Social Economics
21 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics
21 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Mind and Society
20 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought
20 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Foundations of Science
19 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
19 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Review of Economics
18 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Economic Literature
18 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nova Economia
18 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Perspectives on Science
18 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
17 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
17 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sustainability
17 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Philosophy Compass
17 citations, 0.18%
|
|
PLoS ONE
17 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Cahiers d économie politique
17 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Ethical Economy
16 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
16 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Games
16 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Experimental Economics
15 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Contributions to Economics
15 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Feminist Economics
14 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
14 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Review of Radical Political Economics
14 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
14 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Topoi
14 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Environment and Planning A
14 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Revue Economique
13 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
13 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Research Policy
13 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Cogent Economics and Finance
12 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Economic Review
12 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Development Studies
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Happiness Studies
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Economics
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal for General Philosophy of Science
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
European Economic Review
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Bioeconomics
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Social Choice and Welfare
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Public Choice
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
L Actualité économique
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Kyklos
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Rationality and Society
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Metroeconomica
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Organization Studies
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Contributions to Political Economy
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Forecasting
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Business Economics
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Economic Journal
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Around the Tree
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Philosophical Studies
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Economic Education
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Econometrics
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Energy Research and Social Science
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
GENEVA Risk and Insurance Review
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
World Development
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1649 citations, 17.48%
|
|
Springer Nature
1411 citations, 14.96%
|
|
Elsevier
917 citations, 9.72%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
740 citations, 7.84%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
615 citations, 6.52%
|
|
Wiley
468 citations, 4.96%
|
|
SAGE
407 citations, 4.31%
|
|
Oxford University Press
314 citations, 3.33%
|
|
Emerald
267 citations, 2.83%
|
|
CAIRN
124 citations, 1.31%
|
|
MDPI
109 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Duke University Press
87 citations, 0.92%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
75 citations, 0.79%
|
|
OpenEdition
70 citations, 0.74%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
64 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
48 citations, 0.51%
|
|
American Economic Association
40 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
39 citations, 0.41%
|
|
SciELO
33 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
32 citations, 0.34%
|
|
IGI Global
32 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Sirey
26 citations, 0.28%
|
|
MIT Press
23 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
21 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
20 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Kiel Institute for the World Economy
16 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
15 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Academy of Management
13 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IOP Publishing
13 citations, 0.14%
|
|
EDP Sciences
12 citations, 0.13%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
12 citations, 0.13%
|
|
World Scientific
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Brill
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Philosophy Centre of the University of Lisbon
11 citations, 0.12%
|
|
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Annual Reviews
10 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Instituto de Pesquisas Economicas
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
PERSEE Program
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Bristol University Press
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Royal Society
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Accounting Association
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Transaction Publishers
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
BMJ
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Infra-M Academic Publishing House
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Bialystok
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Vysoka Skola Ekonomicka
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Savez Ekonomista Vojvodine
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Public Health Association
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOS Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of California Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Firenze University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Illinois Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Associazone culturale Pragma
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institut fur Asienkunde
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Gaidar Institute Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Project MUSE
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
RPO for the Promotion of Institutes DE RAS
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Guilford Publications
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Physiological Society
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Real Estate Society
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
University of Helsinki
34 publications, 3.43%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
27 publications, 2.72%
|
|
University of Cape Town
16 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
16 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of East Anglia
13 publications, 1.31%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
12 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Georgia State University
12 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Duke University
11 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Université Côte d'Azur
10 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Cambridge
9 publications, 0.91%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
7 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Marquette University
7 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Utrecht University
7 publications, 0.71%
|
|
University of Zurich
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Milan
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Durham University
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Oxford
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Birmingham
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
George Mason University
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
New York University
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Stirling
6 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
George Washington University
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Harvard University
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Vienna
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University College Cork (National University of Ireland, Cork)
5 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Trento
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Insubria
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of KwaZulu-Natal
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Virginia Tech
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of California, Davis
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Groningen
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of New Hampshire
4 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Ankara University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Lausanne
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Nankai University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Bologna
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Turin
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University College London
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Warwick
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
King's College London
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Sorbonne University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Manchester
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Pisa
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Bocconi University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Stanford University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Arizona State University
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Buenos Aires
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Vienna University of Economics and Business
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Johannes Kepler University of Linz
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Coimbra
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Sheffield
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Warsaw
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Exeter
3 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Bahcesehir University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Tampere University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Western Sydney University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
American University of Beirut
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Dundee
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Aarhus University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Southampton
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Cornell University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Sydney
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Siena
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Otago
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of New England
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Tufts University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Chicago
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Athens University of Economics and Business
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Bristol
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of the West of England
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Witten/Herdecke University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Keele University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Minnesota
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Tilburg University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Kassel
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
|
University of Helsinki
9 publications, 6.57%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
6 publications, 4.38%
|
|
University of Cape Town
4 publications, 2.92%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
4 publications, 2.92%
|
|
University of East Anglia
4 publications, 2.92%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
Nankai University
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
University of Cambridge
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
Sorbonne University
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
Georgia State University
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
Utrecht University
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
University of Groningen
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
Université Côte d'Azur
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
University College Cork (National University of Ireland, Cork)
3 publications, 2.19%
|
|
University of Zurich
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Lausanne
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Bologna
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Milan
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Sydney
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
George Mason University
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Duke University
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Chicago
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Marquette University
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Vienna
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Johannes Kepler University of Linz
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Victoria
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Stirling
2 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Geneva
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Maastricht University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Catania
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Siena
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Insubria
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Seattle University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Lingnan University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Oregon State University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Virginia Tech
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Arizona
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Bristol
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Justus Liebig University Giessen
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Tilburg University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Constructor University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Clausthal University of Technology
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Cardiff University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Vienna University of Economics and Business
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Paris School of Economics
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Porto
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Université Paris-Est Créteil
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Warsaw
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Anglia Ruskin University
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Université Laval
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of Barcelona
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
University of York
1 publication, 0.73%
|
|
Show all (54 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
USA
|
USA, 175, 17.64%
USA
175 publications, 17.64%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 113, 11.39%
United Kingdom
113 publications, 11.39%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 65, 6.55%
Netherlands
65 publications, 6.55%
|
France
|
France, 47, 4.74%
France
47 publications, 4.74%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 39, 3.93%
Finland
39 publications, 3.93%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 38, 3.83%
Italy
38 publications, 3.83%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 33, 3.33%
Germany
33 publications, 3.33%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 25, 2.52%
South Africa
25 publications, 2.52%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 12, 1.21%
Australia
12 publications, 1.21%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 12, 1.21%
Spain
12 publications, 1.21%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 12, 1.21%
Canada
12 publications, 1.21%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 11, 1.11%
Switzerland
11 publications, 1.11%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 11, 1.11%
Sweden
11 publications, 1.11%
|
China
|
China, 10, 1.01%
China
10 publications, 1.01%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 9, 0.91%
Portugal
9 publications, 0.91%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 9, 0.91%
Austria
9 publications, 0.91%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 7, 0.71%
Brazil
7 publications, 0.71%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 7, 0.71%
Israel
7 publications, 0.71%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 0.71%
Ireland
7 publications, 0.71%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 6, 0.6%
Denmark
6 publications, 0.6%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 0.6%
Poland
6 publications, 0.6%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 6, 0.6%
Turkey
6 publications, 0.6%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.5%
Greece
5 publications, 0.5%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 4, 0.4%
Russia
4 publications, 0.4%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.4%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.4%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 4, 0.4%
Hungary
4 publications, 0.4%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 4, 0.4%
Czech Republic
4 publications, 0.4%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.3%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.3%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.2%
India
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.2%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.2%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.2%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.2%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.2%
Norway
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.2%
Chile
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.2%
Japan
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.1%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.1%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.1%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.1%
UAE
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.1%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.1%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Show all (10 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
USA
|
USA, 36, 26.28%
USA
36 publications, 26.28%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 23, 16.79%
United Kingdom
23 publications, 16.79%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 17, 12.41%
Netherlands
17 publications, 12.41%
|
France
|
France, 12, 8.76%
France
12 publications, 8.76%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 9, 6.57%
Germany
9 publications, 6.57%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 6.57%
Finland
9 publications, 6.57%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 7, 5.11%
Italy
7 publications, 5.11%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 6, 4.38%
Canada
6 publications, 4.38%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 6, 4.38%
South Africa
6 publications, 4.38%
|
China
|
China, 5, 3.65%
China
5 publications, 3.65%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 5, 3.65%
Switzerland
5 publications, 3.65%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 4, 2.92%
Hungary
4 publications, 2.92%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 2.92%
Ireland
4 publications, 2.92%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 4, 2.92%
Sweden
4 publications, 2.92%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 2.19%
Portugal
3 publications, 2.19%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 2.19%
Australia
3 publications, 2.19%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 2.19%
Austria
3 publications, 2.19%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 2.19%
Brazil
3 publications, 2.19%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 1.46%
Belgium
2 publications, 1.46%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 1.46%
Israel
2 publications, 1.46%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 1.46%
Colombia
2 publications, 1.46%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 1.46%
Poland
2 publications, 1.46%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 1.46%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 1.46%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.73%
Russia
1 publication, 0.73%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.73%
Greece
1 publication, 0.73%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.73%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.73%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.73%
India
1 publication, 0.73%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.73%
Spain
1 publication, 0.73%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|