Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
5.4
SJR
1.058
CiteScore
10.9
Categories
Biochemistry
Plant Science
Cell Biology
Developmental Biology
Genetics
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Years of issue
2014-2025
journal names
Current Plant Biology
CURR PLANT BIOL
Top-3 citing journals

Current Plant Biology
(249 citations)

Frontiers in Plant Science
(248 citations)

Plants
(199 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Oregon State University
(16 publications)

Anand Agricultural University
(6 publications)

Jawaharlal Nehru University
(5 publications)

Oregon State University
(8 publications)

Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(5 publications)

Zhejiang University
(5 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 356
Q2

Evaluation of the Environmental Noise and Prevention Measures for a Standard Hospital Area from Spain
Sánchez-Sánchez R., Barba-Lobo A., Isasti Aizpurua G., Bolivar J.P.
In this research, a global assessment of the acoustic situation of the Juan Ramón Jiménez University Hospital (Huelva, Spain) was carried out. For this study, measurements were made in situ, both outside and inside the buildings. With the methodology used, long-term exterior and interior measurements were performed, and an acoustic propagation model of exterior environmental noise was also developed, digitising the main sources of noise, thereby obtaining the corresponding noise maps of the study area. This study demonstrates that the indices of the external and internal acoustic environment of the hospital exceed those recommended by the World Health Organization, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Spanish law itself. It is concluded that the acoustic environments, both outside and inside, should be improved, for which a series of interventions on the external zone, other interventions on the internal zone, and others on management has been proposed.
Q2

Acoustic Pressure Distribution and Mode-Specific Analysis Along the Bore of the Alto Saxophone
Ukshini E., Dirckx J.
This study investigates the acoustic characteristics of the alto saxophone by analyzing the spectral content of sound pressure along its bore and examining the influence of register valves. A detailed in situ analysis is presented of internal sound pressure from the mouthpiece to the bell for notes ranging from D3 to C#5, using a thin probe microphone needle in the neck and a movable miniature microphone in the body of the saxophone. The findings reveal that the cut-off frequency for lower notes in the first register is located near the third mode, whereas for higher notes, it shifts closer to the fourth mode. This research investigated previous assumptions that the cut-off frequency lies near the sixth mode, instead demonstrating that it occurs at lower modes depending on the note played. In the second register, the cut-off frequency consistently aligns with the second mode for all notes. The results demonstrate that opening the register tone holes alters the sound pressure level (SPL) distribution and shifts the positions of sound pressure valleys, with the first register valve having a more pronounced effect on SPL and mode shape than the second register valve. For the fourth mode in the first register, the register valves exhibit a stronger influence on SPL distribution compared to mode 2.
Q2

From Spherical Harmonics to Gaussian Beampatterns
Parker K.J., Alonso M.A.
The use of multipoles, otherwise called spherical wavefunctions, has been explored for acoustic fields that can be omnidirectional, for example, in scattering theory. Less developed is the use of spherical harmonic multipoles for the construction of directed beams, such as the Gaussian unfocused beampattern, which is an important reference beam in many practical applications. We develop the straightforward construction of a Gaussian unfocused beam using the special properties of the sum of spherical harmonics; these include the use of an imaginary offset in directing the forward propagation to the desired beampattern. Examples are given for narrowband and broadband pulse propagation in the ultrasound MHz range, with comparisons against a classical acoustics formulation of the Gaussian beam. The use of spherical harmonics forms an alternative framework for devising beampatterns, with apodization and concentration issues of the beam linked to an array of a limited number of discrete multipoles at the source.
Q2

Layered Acoustic Structures with Equally Phased Elements
Gori P., Guattari C., Evangelisti L., De Lieto Vollaro R., Asdrubali F.
It is often required to control the acoustic transmission across layered structures in order to favor or, more frequently, limit it in prescribed energy ranges. The selection of the materials and layer thicknesses needed to achieve a given objective is not straightforward, and it is often performed empirically. This is connected with the lack of simple models that dictate the frequency behavior of the layered structure. In this work, we present an approach to the systematic design of layered media, based on an assumption that allows us to obtain simple analytical expressions for the occurrence of bandgaps in the frequency response of ideally infinite periodic structures. Correspondingly low-transmission frequency ranges are then analyzed and discussed in finite-thickness realizations of the designed periodic structures.
Q2

Vocal Directivity of the Greek Singing Voice on the First Three Formant Frequencies
Dedousis G., Bakogiannis K., Andreopoulou A., Georgaki A.
This study explores the relationship between formant frequencies and the directivity patterns of the Greek singing voice. Recordings were conducted in a controlled acoustic environment with four professional singers, two trained in classical music and two in Byzantine chant. Using microphones placed symmetrically on a hemispherical structure, participants sang the Greek vowels across different registers. Directivity patterns were analyzed in third-octave bands centered on each singer’s first three formant frequencies (F1, F2, F3). The results indicate that directivity patterns vary with register and center frequency, with differences observed across vowels and singers. These findings contribute to vocal production research and the development of simulation, auralization, and virtual reality applications for speech and music.
Q2

Characterization and Effects of Floor Impact Sound in Residential Buildings: A Systematic Review
Zou Y., Liu M., Ma H.
The lightweight development trend of modern residential structures reduces sound attenuation in buildings and makes sound propagation paths more complex. Neighbor-induced impact sound has become a significant source of residents’ dissatisfaction with the acoustic environment. To gain a deeper understanding of the characteristics of residential impact sound, reduce its impact on users, and improve the quality of residential buildings, a systematic review of existing research based on PRISMA2020 was carried out. Articles indexed in the Web of Science core dataset and Scopus were searched, with a cutoff date of October 2024. After screening and reviewing, 132 articles were systematically analyzed, categorizing the research on floor impact sound into four aspects, namely impact sound sources, evaluation indicators, prediction methods, and improvement measures. The results show that due to the diversity of real sound sources and differences in living habits, the standard impact sound sources in different countries or regions still need further study. Both subjective and objective evaluations indicate that heavyweight impact sound, particularly low-frequency sound, has the greatest impact on occupants and is the most difficult to eliminate. The physical characteristics of floor impact sound can be predicted using methods such as finite element analysis. However, there are fewer prediction methods for subjective evaluations due to the poor correlation between subjective and objective evaluation indicators. Though different soundproofing measures significantly improve the sound insulation of impact sound, they are still not widely applied due to materials, construction techniques, and time and economic costs. This study provides a reference for research on residential impact sound in China and offers an outlook for future research directions.
Q2

Evaluation of Soundboard Damping Variations on Physical and Perceptual Aspects of the Sound of a Steel-String Acoustic Guitar
Wühle T., Merchel S., Altinsoy M.E.
To make guitars with high sonic quality, it is essential to understand the relationship between the physical characteristics of the selected materials and the acoustic characteristics of the final instrument and how they will be perceived. The selection of wood for the soundboard is a crucial step in the guitar-making process. One relevant physical characteristic is internal material damping, about which, however, only little is known in comparison to other characteristics such as density and Young’s modulus. The present study investigated the relationship of soundboard damping to both physical and perceptual aspects of guitar sound. Three similar steel-string guitars were built with the damping of their soundboards varying between low, mid and high. Measurements of the transfer function and the plucked tone decay of the final guitars were carried out. A listening test and a playing test were conducted. The participants were asked to rate preference and seven sound attributes comprising loudness and both spectral and temporal aspects. To prepare the listening test, a short sequence was recorded by a professional guitarist with each guitar. The results suggest that varying soundboard damping had no practically relevant influence on the physical and perceptual aspects of the sound of the guitar used in this study.
Q2

Effects of Acoustic Shielding on Beamforming for Rotating Sound Source Localization
Zhang C., Lee C.W., Ma W.
Beamforming for rotating sound source localization (denoted by rotating beamforming) is widely used in engineering nowadays. Acoustic shielding, such as shafts and covers, is typically employed in the practical measurement of rotating source localization. Acoustic shielding blocks the signal propagation between rotating sources and the array, and thus affects the performance of rotating beamforming. However, the detailed effects of acoustic shielding on rotating beamforming are still unclear. In this study, the blocking rate that represents the degree of signal propagation path blockage is defined first. The effects of acoustic shielding on rotating beamforming are then investigated in simulations. Finally, these effects are verified by experiments. According to the results of the simulation and experiments, rotating beamforming can still localize rotating sources, as long as the signal propagation path is not completely blocked. However acoustic shielding decreases sound intensity accuracy, especially when the blocking rate is larger than 50%. When acoustic shielding is employed, the ability of rotating beamforming to compensate for Doppler effects weakens.
Q2

Identification of the Aeroacoustic Emission Source Regions Within a Ceiling Swirl Diffuser
Ostmann P., Kremer M., Müller D.
The acoustic emissions of ventilation systems and their subcomponents contribute to the perceived overall comfort in indoor environments and are, therefore, the subject of research. In contrast to fans, there is little research on the aeroacoustic properties of air diffusers (often referred to as outlets). This study investigates a commercially available ceiling swirl diffuser. Using a hybrid approach, a detailed three-dimensional large-eddy simulation is coupled with a perturbed wave equation to capture the aeroacoustic processes within the diffuser. The flow model is validated for the investigated operating point of 470 m3/h using laser-optical and acoustic measurements. To identify the noise sources, the acoustic pressure is sampled with various receivers and on cut sections to evaluate the cross-power spectral density, and the sound-pressure level distribution on cut sections is evaluated. It is found that the plenum attenuates the noise near its acoustic eigenmodes and thus dominates other noise sources by several orders of magnitude. By implementing the plenum walls as sound-absorbing, the overall sound-pressure level is predicted to decrease by nearly 10 dB/Hz. Other relevant geometric features are the mounting beam and the guide elements, which are responsible for flow-borne noise emissions near 698 Hz and 2699 Hz, respectively.
Q2

Quality Comparison of Dynamic Auditory Virtual-Reality Simulation Approaches of Approaching Vehicles Regarding Perceptual Behavior and Psychoacoustic Values
Krautwurm J., Oberfeld-Twistel D., Huisman T., Maravich M.M., Altinsoy E.
Traffic safety experiments are often conducted in virtual environments in order to avoid dangerous situations and conduct the experiments more cost-efficiently. This means that attention must be paid to the fidelity of the traffic scenario reproduction, because the pedestrians’ judgments have to be close to reality. To understand behavior in relation to the prevailing audio rendering systems better, a listening test was conducted which focused on perceptual differences between simulation and playback methods. Six vehicle driving-by-scenes were presented using two different simulation methods and three different playback methods, and binaural recordings from the test track acquired during the recordings of the vehicle sound sources for the simulation were additionally incorporated. Each vehicle driving-by-scene was characterized by different vehicle types and different speeds. Participants rated six attributes of the perceptual dimensions: “timbral balance”, “naturalness”, “room-related”, “source localization”, “loudness” and “speed perception”. While the ratings showed a high degree of similarity among the ratings of the sound attributes in the different reproduction systems, there were minor differences in the speed and loudness estimations and the different perceptions of brightness stood out. A comparison of the loudness ratings in the scenes featuring electric and combustion-engine vehicles highlights the issue of reduced detection abilities with regard to the former.
Q2

Exploring Agreement in Voice Acoustic Parameters: A Repeated Measures Case Study Across Varied Recording Instruments, Speech Samples, and Daily Timeframes
Cantor-Cutiva L.C., Castillo-Allendes A., Hunter E.J.
Aims: The aim was to assess the agreement between microphone-derived and neck accelerometer-derived voice acoustic parameters and their associations with recording moments and speech types. Methods: Using simultaneous recordings, a 7-week study on a single individual was conducted to reduce intersubject variability. Agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman plots, and associations were examined with generalized estimating equations. Results: Bland–Altman plots showed no significant bias between microphone (MIC) and accelerometer (ACC) measurements for alpha ratio, CPP, PPE, SPL SD, fundamental frequency (fo) mean, and SD. Speech type and measurement timing were significantly associated with alpha ratio, while the instrument was not. Microphone measurements resulted in slightly lower CPP compared to the accelerometer, while reading samples yielded higher CPP compared to vowel productions. PPE, SPL SD, and fo mean showed significant associations with speech type, based on univariate analysis. Microphone measurements yielded a statistically smaller fo SD compared to the accelerometer, while reading productions had a larger fo SD than vowel productions. Conclusions: Fundamental frequency, alpha ratio, PPE, and SPL SD values were robust, regardless of the instrument used, suggesting the potential use of accelerometers in less-controlled environments. These findings are crucial for enhancing confidence in voice metrics and exploring efficient clinical assessment protocols.
Q2

A Periodic Extension to the Fokas Method for Acoustic Scattering by an Infinite Grating
Naqvi S.B., Ayton L.J.
The Fokas method (also known as the unified transform method) is used to investigate acoustic scattering by thin, infinite grating by extending the methodology to apply to spatially periodic domains. Infinite grating is used to model a perforated screen, a material of interest in aeroacoustics and noise reduction. Once the method is established, its numerical results are verified against the Wiener–Hopf (WH) technique, which has solved the problem only for a special case. A key benefit of the novel approach is that the scatterer, modelled as an infinitely repeating unit cell consisting of a thin, rigid plate, can take any length. This is in contrast to the WH method, where the plate length is restricted to half the width of the unit cell (for this method, no such restriction exists). The numerical method is an over-sampled collocation method of the integral equation resulting from applying the Fokas method: the global relation. The only increase in complexity in adapting the Fokas method to more complicated cell geometries is a higher number of terms in the global relation. The proportion of energy transmitted and reflected by the grating structure is assessed for varying incident wave angles, frequencies, and plate lengths.
Q2

Improved Direct–Parallel Active Noise Control Systems for Narrowband Noise
Chang C., Ho M., Kuo S.M.
Narrowband active noise control (NANC) systems are extensively used to cancel narrowband noise. Direct, parallel, and direct–parallel NANC systems use nonacoustic sensors to measure rotational speeds, and a bank of signal generators then produces synchronized sinusoidal waveforms as reference signals corresponding to the fundamental frequency of the undesired noise. The performance of direct NANC systems is based on the frequency difference between two adjacent reference input sinusoids. Parallel NANC systems apply several sinewave generators and two-weight adaptive filters in parallel to attenuate these narrowband components. Conventional direct–parallel NANC systems split these sinusoids into several mutually exclusive sets such that the distance between frequencies within sets is maximized. This paper proposes an improved direct–parallel NANC system in which reference sinusoidal signals are separated by amplitude to enhance efficiency and improve noise reduction performance. Several experiments were conducted using a muffler model to verify the performance of the proposed NANC system.
Q2

Effect of Acoustic Absorber Type and Size on Sound Absorption of Porous Materials in a Full-Scale Reverberation Chamber
Ikpekha O.W., Simms M.
The acoustic product development process, crucial for effective noise control, emphasises efficient testing and validation of materials for sound absorption in the R&D phase. Balancing cost-effectiveness, speed, and sustainability, the focus is on minimising excess materials. While strides have been made in reducing sample sizes for estimating random-incident absorption, challenges persist, particularly in establishing validity thresholds for smaller samples with increasing thickness, susceptible to potential overestimation due to edge effects. This study delves into analysing the absorption coefficients of widely used acoustic absorber types—polyester, fibreglass, and open-cell foam—in a full-scale reverberation chamber at Ventac, Blessington, and Wicklow. Demonstrating significant absorption above 500 Hz, these porous absorbers exhibit diminished effectiveness at lower frequencies. The strategic combination of these absorbers with different facings enhances their theoretical broadband absorption characteristics in practical applications. Moreover, the study assesses the validity threshold for reduced sample sizes, employing statistical analysis against ISO 354:2003 standard control samples of the absorber types. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) on material groups underscores the significant influence of frequency components and sample sizes on the absorption coefficient. The determined validity threshold for 12.8 sqm ISO 354 standard control size is 7.7 sqm for the 25 mm open-cell foam. Similarly, the validity threshold of the 12 sqm ISO 354 standard control size is 9.6 sqm for the 20 mm 800 gsm polyester, 7.2 sqm for the 25 mm fibreglass, and the vinyl black on 25 mm fibreglass.
Q2

Determining Water Pipe Leakage Using an RP-CNN Model to Identify the Causes and Improve Poor-Accuracy Cases
Caronge M.A., Shibuya T., Arai Y., Dong X., Kunizane T., Koizumi A.
This study aimed to assess and improve the accuracy of a water leakage detection model proposed in preliminary research. The poor results for water leakage sound (recall) and background noise (specificity) were clarified using countermeasures in accordance with each condition. Additionally, frequency amplification in the range of 500–600 Hz, the attenuation of weak components, and a band-stop filter were used to remove the 50 Hz component and harmonics. Pre-processing was carried out in the form of amplification, with weak noise removed using a band-stop filter. The results showed that the application of the proposed model improved the detection accuracy by 80% at the observation points that initially had poor accuracy. Thus, the proposed method was effective at improving the performance of the Recurrence Plot-Convolutional Neural Network (RP-CNN) model for detecting water leakages.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Current Plant Biology
249 citations, 4.53%
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
248 citations, 4.51%
|
|
Plants
199 citations, 3.62%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
92 citations, 1.67%
|
|
Agronomy
90 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Scientific Reports
84 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
58 citations, 1.06%
|
|
BMC Plant Biology
57 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
53 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
40 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Microorganisms
39 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Horticulturae
36 citations, 0.66%
|
|
PLoS ONE
36 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Plant Stress
36 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Molecules
33 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Scientia Horticulturae
32 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
31 citations, 0.56%
|
|
South African Journal of Botany
31 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Botany
31 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
29 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Plant Journal
28 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology
26 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Industrial Crops and Products
25 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
25 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
25 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
24 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Genes
24 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
21 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Plant Growth Regulation
21 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Molecular Biology Reports
20 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Planta
20 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Heliyon
20 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Foods
19 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture
19 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
19 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Plant Cell Reports
18 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Sustainability
18 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Rhizosphere
17 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Environmental and Experimental Botany
17 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Applied Soil Ecology
17 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Euphytica
17 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Biology
17 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Microbiological Research
16 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Theoretical And Applied Genetics
16 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Plant Science
16 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Phytobiomes Journal
16 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Fungi
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Plant Physiology
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
European Journal of Plant Pathology
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Forests
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
American Journal of Botany
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Physiologia Plantarum
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
PeerJ
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Current Opinion in Plant Biology
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Antioxidants
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Cereal Research Communications
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Plant and Soil
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Trends in Plant Science
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Microbial Ecology
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
New Phytologist
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Plant Gene
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Archives of Microbiology
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Life
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Compendium of Plant Genomes
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Plant Genome
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
BMC Genomics
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Plant, Cell and Environment
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Food Chemistry
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Chemosphere
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Food Bioscience
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Molecular Breeding
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Plant Physiology Reports
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
3 Biotech
10 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Viruses
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Molecular Biology and Evolution
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Plant Direct
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Environmental Pollution
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Food Research International
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Protoplasma
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Plant Breeding
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Microbiology spectrum
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Plant Biotechnology Journal
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Nucleic Acids Research
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
BIO Web of Conferences
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Agronomy
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Microorganisms for Sustainability
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Nature Communications
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
Elsevier
1396 citations, 25.4%
|
|
Springer Nature
1254 citations, 22.82%
|
|
MDPI
810 citations, 14.74%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
393 citations, 7.15%
|
|
Wiley
349 citations, 6.35%
|
|
Oxford University Press
153 citations, 2.78%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
114 citations, 2.07%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
112 citations, 2.04%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
46 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Scientific Societies
41 citations, 0.75%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
37 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
35 citations, 0.64%
|
|
IntechOpen
30 citations, 0.55%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
21 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
20 citations, 0.36%
|
|
IOP Publishing
18 citations, 0.33%
|
|
EDP Sciences
17 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Crop Science Society of America
16 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
15 citations, 0.27%
|
|
PeerJ
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
14 citations, 0.25%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SciELO
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Annual Reviews
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
King Saud University
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Korean Society of Breeding Science
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
The Royal Society
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Gabonatermesztesi Kutato Kozhasznu Tarsasag/Cereal Research Non-Profit Company
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Academic Journals
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Magnolia Press
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
SAGE
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Brill
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
China National Rice Research Institute
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japanese Society for Plant Cell and Molecular Biology
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
F1000 Research
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AIP Publishing
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Portland Press
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Microbiology Society
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Plant Management Network
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Brazilian Society of Floriculture and Ornamental Plants
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IGI Global
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Physiological Society
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Genetica
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Asian Network for Scientific Information
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Universia Espana
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
AcademicPres
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Nematologists
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Science and Technology
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
S. Karger AG
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
FSBSI FRC N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Horticultural Science
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Experimental Botany
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
IOS Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Emerald
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Higher Education Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
International Dose-Response Society
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
The Korean Society of Genetics
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics (NAS Ukraine)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Society for the Study of Reproduction
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
The Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Japanese Society for Horticultural Science
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Korea Genome Organization
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Fundacion Romulo Raggio
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Plant Taxonomy
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Kemerovo State University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Japanese Society of Breeding
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Science in China Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
Oregon State University
16 publications, 3.72%
|
|
Anand Agricultural University
6 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Jawaharlal Nehru University
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Zhejiang University
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Western Australia
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
North Carolina State University
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
East Tennessee State University
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Delhi
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Aligarh Muslim University
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics India
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Amity University, Noida
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Lucknow
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Iowa State University
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
National Botanical Research Institute
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Ghent University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
China Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Shandong Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
North-West University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Seoul National University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Sejong University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Washington
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of California, Davis
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
International Rice Research Institute
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Universidade Estadual Paulista
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Texas A&M University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Al Farabi Kazakh National University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Tehran
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Panjab University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Homi Bhabha National Institute
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Kerala
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Kashmir
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Osmania University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Punjab Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Visva-Bharati University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
National Institute of Plant Genome Research
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Indian Agricultural Research Institute
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Vignan's Foundation for Science, Technology & Research
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Helsinki
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Guangdong Ocean University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Qingdao Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Weifang University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Tuscia University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Rwanda
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Ibadan
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Lagos
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Rural Development Administration
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Gyeongsang National University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Kyoto University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Dali University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of the Philippines Los Baños
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Hunan Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Göttingen
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Ehime University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Life Sciences in Poznań
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Warsaw University of Life Sciences
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Florida
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
AgroParisTech
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Wolaita Sodo University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Institute of Semiconductor Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Novosibirsk State Technical University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Kemerovo State University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Botanical Garden of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
National university of Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
King Khalid University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
King Faisal University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
Oregon State University
8 publications, 2.64%
|
|
Zhejiang University
5 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Jawaharlal Nehru University
4 publications, 1.32%
|
|
North Carolina State University
4 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Delhi
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics India
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
National Botanical Research Institute
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Anand Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
China Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Shandong Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Western Australia
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
North-West University
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Sejong University
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Universidade Estadual Paulista
3 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Al Farabi Kazakh National University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Homi Bhabha National Institute
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Kerala
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Kashmir
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Punjab Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
National Institute of Plant Genome Research
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Amity University, Noida
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Vignan's Foundation for Science, Technology & Research
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Helsinki
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Guangdong Ocean University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Qingdao Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Weifang University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Iowa State University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Queensland
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Seoul National University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Rural Development Administration
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Gyeongsang National University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
International Rice Research Institute
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Dali University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of the Philippines Los Baños
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Hunan Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
East Tennessee State University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Wolaita Sodo University
2 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Institute of Semiconductor Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Novosibirsk State Technical University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Kemerovo State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
National university of Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
King Khalid University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
King Faisal University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Qassim University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Tehran
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Panjab University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Tabriz
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Chandigarh University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Alagappa University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Central University of Jammu
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Osmania University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Manisa Celal Bayar University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Gaziosmanpasa University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Shahrekord University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Al-Muthanna University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Shoolini University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Lorestan University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Indian Agricultural Research Institute
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Jaypee University of Information Technology
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Persian Gulf University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Central University of Odisha
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Central University of Haryana
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Presidency University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Cyprus University of Technology
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Sri Venkateswara University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
National Dairy Research Institute
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Central Food Technological Research Institute
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Manipal Academy of Higher Education
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
USA
|
USA, 76, 17.67%
USA
76 publications, 17.67%
|
India
|
India, 72, 16.74%
India
72 publications, 16.74%
|
China
|
China, 43, 10%
China
43 publications, 10%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 13, 3.02%
Brazil
13 publications, 3.02%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 12, 2.79%
Australia
12 publications, 2.79%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 11, 2.56%
Republic of Korea
11 publications, 2.56%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 10, 2.33%
Germany
10 publications, 2.33%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 9, 2.09%
Italy
9 publications, 2.09%
|
France
|
France, 7, 1.63%
France
7 publications, 1.63%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 7, 1.63%
Bangladesh
7 publications, 1.63%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 1.63%
Spain
7 publications, 1.63%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 7, 1.63%
Poland
7 publications, 1.63%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 1.4%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 1.4%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 6, 1.4%
Canada
6 publications, 1.4%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 6, 1.4%
Nigeria
6 publications, 1.4%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 6, 1.4%
Pakistan
6 publications, 1.4%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 6, 1.4%
Ethiopia
6 publications, 1.4%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 5, 1.16%
Iran
5 publications, 1.16%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 1.16%
Turkey
5 publications, 1.16%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 1.16%
Japan
5 publications, 1.16%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 4, 0.93%
Russia
4 publications, 0.93%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 4, 0.93%
Argentina
4 publications, 0.93%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.93%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.93%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0.93%
Colombia
4 publications, 0.93%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.93%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.93%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 4, 0.93%
Morocco
4 publications, 0.93%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.93%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.93%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 4, 0.93%
Philippines
4 publications, 0.93%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 0.93%
South Africa
4 publications, 0.93%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 0.7%
Netherlands
3 publications, 0.7%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.7%
Switzerland
3 publications, 0.7%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 0.47%
Kazakhstan
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.47%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.47%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.47%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.47%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.47%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.47%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 2, 0.47%
Nepal
2 publications, 0.47%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.47%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 2, 0.47%
Rwanda
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.47%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.47%
Finland
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.47%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.23%
Benin
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.23%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.23%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.23%
Israel
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.23%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.23%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.23%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.23%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.23%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.23%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.23%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.23%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 1, 0.23%
Mali
1 publication, 0.23%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.23%
UAE
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.23%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.23%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.23%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.23%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 1, 0.23%
Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.23%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.23%
Chile
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.23%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Show all (36 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
India
|
India, 43, 14.19%
India
43 publications, 14.19%
|
USA
|
USA, 39, 12.87%
USA
39 publications, 12.87%
|
China
|
China, 37, 12.21%
China
37 publications, 12.21%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 12, 3.96%
Brazil
12 publications, 3.96%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 10, 3.3%
Republic of Korea
10 publications, 3.3%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 8, 2.64%
Australia
8 publications, 2.64%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 5, 1.65%
Bangladesh
5 publications, 1.65%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 5, 1.65%
Spain
5 publications, 1.65%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 1.65%
Italy
5 publications, 1.65%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 1.65%
Pakistan
5 publications, 1.65%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 1.65%
Turkey
5 publications, 1.65%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 5, 1.65%
Ethiopia
5 publications, 1.65%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 1.32%
Iran
4 publications, 1.32%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 1.32%
Poland
4 publications, 1.32%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 1.32%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 1.32%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 0.99%
Germany
3 publications, 0.99%
|
France
|
France, 3, 0.99%
France
3 publications, 0.99%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 3, 0.99%
United Kingdom
3 publications, 0.99%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.99%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.99%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.99%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.99%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.99%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.99%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 0.99%
South Africa
3 publications, 0.99%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 0.99%
Japan
3 publications, 0.99%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.66%
Russia
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 0.66%
Kazakhstan
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.66%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.66%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.66%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.66%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.66%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.66%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.66%
Finland
2 publications, 0.66%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.33%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.33%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.33%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.33%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.33%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.33%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1, 0.33%
Canada
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.33%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.33%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.33%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.33%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.33%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 1, 0.33%
Mali
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.33%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.33%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.33%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.33%
UAE
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.33%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.33%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.33%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 1, 0.33%
Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.33%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.33%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Show all (23 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|