Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.6
SJR
0.561
CiteScore
4.4
Categories
Public Administration
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2012-2025
journal names
Journal of Public Procurement
J PUBLIC PROCUR
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Public Procurement
(741 citations)

Sustainability
(129 citations)

Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
(98 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Florida Atlantic University
(13 publications)

Makerere University
(7 publications)

University of Twente
(7 publications)

Makerere University
(2 publications)

Norwegian University of Science and Technology
(2 publications)

Stockholm University
(2 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 137

Determinants of ICT outsourcing among the locally-owned manufacturers in Malaysia
Yap C.S., Lim Y.M., Jalaludin F.W., Lee T.H.
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the level of information and communication technology (ICT) outsourcing and its determinants in the Malaysian locally owned manufacturing firms. Drawing on the transaction cost theory and the resource-based theory, four determinants – asset specificity, uncertainty, business skills and technical skills – were hypothesized to influence ICT outsourcing.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were collected using a questionnaire survey from 104 manufacturing firms listed on the Directory of Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers. Data were then analyzed using R package partial least squares path modeling.
Findings
The study reveals that slightly over two-thirds (68 per cent) of the surveyed manufacturers either fully or partially outsourced their ICT services. Asset specificity and uncertainty are found to be positively related to the level of ICT outsourcing, which contradict the prediction of the transaction cost theory. On the other hand, business skills and technical skills are not significantly related to the level of ICT outsourcing, which also conflict the resource-based arguments.
Research limitations/implications
The small sample size would not be able to make meaningful conclusion for the population; the small R2 value indicates that other important determinants of ICT outsourcing were not tested in this study, and the transaction cost theory and the resource-based theory do not adequately predict the level of ICT outsourcing in the Malaysian locally owned manufacturers.
Originality/value
The study serves as one of the first studies that tested the determinants of ICT outsourcing using the transaction cost theory and the resource-based theory in locally owned manufacturing firms of a developing country.

An exploratory study on the impact of recruitment process outsourcing on employer branding of an organisation
Gilani H., Jamshed S.
Purpose
This paper aims to focus on “Recruitment Process Outsourcing” (RPO) as a key element of improvement in corporate brand of organisation through using the talent and capabilities of employees. This research explores the linkages and interconnection between the concepts of RPO and its contribution towards the employer branding process. The review of the literature on RPO and employer branding identifies an emergence of conceptual framework based around outsourcing effectiveness and its impact on employer branding.
Design/methodology/approach
Exploratory research was carried out using case study analysis to give clear and deep understanding of the RPO and its impact on employer branding. This was conducted by using the semi-structured interviews with the HR and marketing managers using the qualitative method. The findings propose a conceptual framework which is representative for the organisations engaged in RPO.
Findings
The key findings include talented employees’ role in improving the brand image of any organisation; the development of customers’ perceptions through their attitude and behaviours; the reduction in the HR costs through RPO Services, the responsibility of the organisation taken by RPO which provides the chance for HR professionals and top management to focus on core activities; and the organisational care in selection of the RPO service provider as per their criteria.
Research limitations/implications
This research has been limited to assessing the impact of RPO on the employer branding of manufacturing organisations purely due to access issues. The research clearly establishes a good link between the operationalisation of RPO and its direct influences on an organisation’s employer branding through its outsourced employees. The research clearly highlights the importance of and the vital role played by the outsourced employees and how they need to be nurtured through a strong corporate culture and make them great brand ambassadors.
Practical implications
At the practical level, this study has several managerial implications, as the findings provide a good understanding of the concept of RPO and how it impacts the employer brands of the organisation. The research gives confidence to the HR managers and directors on the importance of outsourced staff members and the need to address the issues concerning the employee branding of an outsourced member of staff. The outcome of the research gives a conceptual model which represents the impact of an outsourced employee on the employer branding process of the organisation. This conceptual model highlights the many different factors that need to be addressed by a HR manager to keep consistency in employee branding of the organisation.
Social implications
The social implications of this research relate to the wellbeing and motivated staff members of an organisation, even though they do not work directly under the brand of the company they serve in. As mentioned in the research findings, the complications of the RPO process usually has drastic and serious impacts on employee attitudes and feelings when it comes to issues like change management, job satisfaction and the sense of belonging to the organisation. By addressing the different factors explored in the conceptual model of this research, an outsourced employee can feel equally motivated and belonging to the organisation they serve in, just as any other permanent member of staff who acts like an ideal brand ambassador for the employer branding of the organisation.
Originality/value
This research is original and adds value to the dynamics of RPO processes by exploring the impact of the process on employer branding of the organisation through its brand ambassadors. This research paves way for further research to be carried out within service organisations where employees play a vital role in being the brand ambassadors of their employer brands.

Local industry technological capability development using outsourcing opportunities
Gewe A.M., Abebe B.B., Azene D.K., Bayu F.G.
Purpose
Technological outsourcing requires possessing the technological capability level by enterprises taking the outsourced activity and further mandates build-up capabilities. Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in developing nations such as Ethiopia are usually equipped with low level of technological capability and could benefit from government-supported or government-initiated outsourcing networks. The current study aims to preliminarily assess performance of outsourcing initiative taken by the Hibret Manufacturing and Machine Building Industry, a subsidiary of a national corporation, in developing technological capability of SMEs in Ethiopia.
Design/methodology/approach
The study used a qualitative research approach through interviews with the parent company officials and owners of SMEs and site visit to these SMEs. Findings are organized in a way to draw lessons to be learned from technological outsourcing examined.
Findings
Technological learning, acquisition of new technologies, market access and process innovation are few capabilities achieved by the involved SMEs. To facilitate and harness these opportunities and further assist in policy ratification, a conceptual framework has been presented and elaborated.
Research limitations/implications
Further investigation into outsourcing procedure and biases are expected to shed further light onto the outsourcing initiative by the parent company. This study drew results from investigation of the SMEs involved. Additional investigation of other SMEs is expected to reveal additional insights.
Originality/value
There is a dearth of literature focusing on exploration of technological outsourcing in low-income developing countries, such as Ethiopia, to build SMEs’ technological capabilities. This research presents insightful contribution to strategic outsourcing to build local technological capability in developing economies.

ISO 37500 – Comparing outsourcing life-cycle models
Babin R., Quayle A.
Purpose
This paper aims to illustrate the value of the outsourcing life cycle, as described in several industry models, including ISO 37500.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors present a comparison of outsourcing life cycles to provide an overview of current practices in the global outsourcing industry.
Findings
Several outsourcing life cycles have been defined by industry associations such as the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals (IAOP) and the National Outsourcing Association (NOA). Academic research has created several outsourcing life cycles, notably the model from the London School of Economics (Cullen and Willcocks, 2005). Finally, commercial models have been defined, for example the Vendor and Sourcing Management model from IDC (2014).
Research limitations/implications
Researchers will find the overview of different life cycles useful in assessing maturity of outsourcing organizations.
Practical implications
Practitioners will find the detailed description of ISO 37500 and the comparative life cycles to be illustrative of different approaches to managing outsourcing transactions. Both buyers and providers will be able to compare their own life cycle to industry standards.
Originality/value
Little or no research has been conducted on how outsourcing life cycles contribute to effective outsourcing. This paper provides a foundation for such research.

Servitization in contract manufacturing – evidence from Polar business cases
Viitamo E., Luoto S., Seppälä T.
Purpose
This paper aims to contribute to the scholarly debate on the origins and nature of industrial servitization. By resorting to contract manufacturing (CM) as an empirical case, it is posited that any product-service solution that a manufacturing firm is capable of delivering on a competitive basis mirrors its goals in value creation and capture, positioning within its value networks and the pool of assets and competences it holds.
Design/methodology/approach
To support this argument, a comparative case study of two CM firms that represent polar cases in the industry was conducted. The primary data were collected through participatory methodology, observations and semi-structured interviews of company representatives. The business experiences of an industry practitioner provided a distinct contribution to the content analysis and modelling.
Findings
It was concluded that servitization becomes endogenous as contract manufacturers aim for higher profitability through the insource of customer activities and hence extend their offering downstream in the supply chain. The findings suggest that the way out of the servitization trap is a shift toward original design and manufacturing business, where high value-adding modules are insourced and integrated into replicable solutions for various types of customers and market segments.
Research limitations/implications
The generalization of the conclusion is constrained by the limited focus on two cases only. More industry and company data are therefore required to further validate this argument. Particularly valuable will be the data on the intermediate business models between the two polar cases.
Originality/value
Building on contested business practices, this paper outlines the logic of competitive strategy in CM on the basis of specific characteristics and implications of the various business concepts. In this case, the principal drivers of servitization are the acquisition of supporting capabilities and insourcing of customer activities. The case study method integrates theory with academic observation and managerial experiences.

Strategic sourcing business models
Vitasek K.
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to describe how seven sourcing models operate along a continuum depending on the complexity of the marketplace and the strategic needs of buyers and suppliers. Studies of business procurement and sourcing practices reveal that collaborative and holistic approaches will increase efficiencies and value in strategic outsourcing relationships.
Design/methodology/approach
The design is based on research and fieldwork from the University of Tennessee and vetted with the Sourcing Industry Group, the Center for Outsourcing Research and Education and the International Association for Contracts and Commercial Management. This work provided the basis and framework for the 2015 book, Strategic Sourcing in the New Economy: Harnessing the Potential of Sourcing Business Models in Modern Procurement.
Findings
Most organizations operate under conventional transaction-based models that are constrained by a formal, legally oriented, risk-averse and liability-based culture. There is growing awareness that transactional-based approaches do not always give each party the intended, or best, results. University of Tennessee research shows how organizations apply alternative output- and outcome-based approaches for complex contracts. That experience demonstrates that alternative Sourcing Business Models are viable approaches to the conventional transactional methods[1]. As senior leaders see positive results from carefully crafted collaborative agreements, momentum grows for both output- and outcome-based approaches.
Practical implications
Education on sourcing business models.
Originality/value
Collaborative outsourcing.

HR outsourcing trends in Malaysia: the undetected tiger
Sim S.C., Avvari V. M., Kaliannan M.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to provide deeper and broader insights into human resource outsourcing (HRO) trends and practices specific to the Malaysian context.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from HR managers through a questionnaire-based survey, using convenient sampling with random selection.FindingsHRO practices were found to have evolved into second-generation outsourcing, with considerable potential to grow further in the future. Firm size and sector had little or no effect on the degree of HRO. Both cost benefits and resourced-based benefits were key drivers of HRO decisions, with a majority of the firms reporting having achieved these benefits equally and positively. Most of the functions outsourced were traditional-transactional HR functions. Slightly more than half of the HRO decisions were made by top management without the involvement of HR managers. More than half of the firms surveyed intended to do more outsourcing in the near future (i.e. within the next two to five years), including firms that had previously experienced HRO failure.Research limitations/implicationsWhile convenience sampling limits the generalisability of the findings, it is suitable for a study like this, especially as there is no pre-established list of firms outsourcing HR available in Malaysia. The study did not cover trends in either HR shared services or insourcing – either of which could potentially affect future HRO trends in the future. The findings also serve as a warning to future HRO researchers about the importance of contextual knowledge to strengthen the validity of their findings.Practical implicationsThe findings provide both practitioners and service providers with insights into HRO practices and trends in Malaysia, which are comprehensively discussed in the paper.Originality/valueThis paper presents a broad, yet up-to-date, overview of HRO practices and trends specific to the Malaysian context. It covers aspects and details of HRO not explored or explicitly discussed before.

Strategic manoeuvers in outsourcing arrangements
Plugge A., Borman M., Janssen M.
Purpose
Adaptation is often seen as a key competitive advantage for outsourcing vendors. Outsourcing research has often assumed that vendor capabilities are static. However, as a result of uncertainties and/or changes in the client environment, vendors need to be able to adapt their outsourcing capabilities. The aim of our research is to compare two contrasting outsourcing approaches and illustrate how an adaptive approach may deliver better results for clients in the long term.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper uses a combination of literature and case study research. A retrospective case study approach was adopted, using interviews, observations and analysis of reports. Two case studies utilizing contrasting clients approaches were investigated and compared. In one of the case studies, the client reorganized activities first and then outsourced them, while in the other, the client did the reverse – outsourced first and then reorganized.
Findings
The findings indicate that reorganizing first and outsourcing afterwards contributes to a more controlled implementation, which results in a more defined and stable set of vendor outsourcing capabilities that contributed to short-term success. In contrast, outsourcing first and reorganizing later demonstrates a less controlled redesign of the client’s organizational structure, which requires a malleable set of outsourcing capabilities to accommodate future change. The latter strategic manoeuver results in an extended adaptation period, as some capabilities need to be developed over time. However, it may improve success over time as subsequent changes in the client environment can be catered for in a better way.
Research limitations/implications
Only two explorative case studies were performed, limiting confidence in the degree of generalization of the results. We plea for more research on the effect of context dependency as various contingencies may impact the adaptation of outsourcing capabilities; for example, the volatility of the client’s market or the stability of the technology concerned.
Practical implications
When a client applies a proactive manoeuver, reorganizing first and then applying outsourcing, the number of adaptive capabilities required of the outsourcing vendor is reduced, limiting the risk for the client in the short term. In the longer term, however, subsequent change requirements may be less well-accommodated.
Originality/value
Strategic manoeuvers within an outsourcing context have received limited attention in research. As far as we know, this is the first empirical research that investigates the benefits of vendors having adaptive capability.

Implementing environmental sustainability in logistics operations: a case study
Jørsfeldt L.M., Hvolby H., Nguyen V.T.
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to develop an in-depth understanding of how supplier–buyer relationships, particularly in operational coordination, are affected when a company introduces an environmental sustainability target (CO2 emissions reduction) into its supply chain operations. The investigation focuses on the joint activities of the logistics function of the company (buyer) and the third-party logistics providers (3PLs) (suppliers).
Design/methodology/approach
This single-case study takes the perspective of a sustainability-conscious Danish company that outsources logistics services to 3PLs but maintains internal logistics as a boundary function. The value offering point/order penetration point (VOP/OPP) methodology is used.
Findings
The results showed that the introduction of sustainability led to the emergence of multiple decoupling points in both the demand and the supply chains. The logistics function therefore began to play the role of “integrator” across both the functions in the company and the organizations in the supply chain. The findings indicate the need to develop clear cross-functional and inter-organizational coordination mechanisms.
Research limitations/implications
This is a single-case study in a Danish context.
Practical implications
The study provides rich insights into managing the implementation of sustainability in supply chain operations, and it exemplifies how the VOP/OPP tool can be applied by 3PLs to develop sustainable offerings.
Originality/value
The current research on sustainable supply chain management takes into account the entire supply chain. In contrast, this study focuses on the logistics function. The VOP/OPP concept is used to capture the processes used in actual practice, and both the buyer and the supplier are considered potential co-producers of value.

Analysis and management of risks associated with outsourcing in China
El Fadil J., St-Pierre J.
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the risks associated with outsourcing production to emerging countries with lower labour costs, namely China, and study actions and plans used to reduce the influence of factors/drivers that induce these risks.
Design/methodology/approach
This research uses a multiple case-study methodology, involving seven Canadian manufacturing firms that have chosen an outsourcing strategy in China. It is based on a particular approach of classifying factors/drivers that may generate risks related to this strategy and on interviews with two managers per firm to reduce personal bias.
Findings
In each of the seven cases studied, outsourcing was chosen to take advantage of lower labour costs in China, but in reality, costs were higher than expected due to unforeseen factors inherent to the risks involved. This study reveals that risks generated by factors/drivers such as lack of experience, reduced control over foreign operations and cultural differences are of major concern for managers outsourcing part of their production to China. However, according to some executives that were interviewed, certain actions can be taken by firms to overcome the negative influence of these factors/drivers. Furthermore, some risks may have multiple causes or be induced by other risks.
Research limitations/implications
The sample of this study was composed of firms from different industrial sectors, and the authors were therefore unable to analyse sector-specific risks. As the industrial sector has an impact on the technical complexity of the products and their components, it would be appropriate to reconduct our research using samples drawn from similar sectors.
Practical implications
These findings can help guide the decisions of managers wishing to outsource some of their activities to China and other emerging countries. They will contribute to the success of outsourcing strategies to these countries, as they reveal the risks associated with these strategies and the ways to deal with factors/drivers that can induce them. For example, building long-term relationships with Chinese partners based on collaboration, trust and mutual benefit as well as conducting a rigorous prospecting phase and taking time to select the right subcontractor can have a major impact on reducing risks.
Originality/value
The main contribution of this work is the analysis of risks associated with outsourcing to China, based on a categorisation of factors/drivers that can generate these risks, and the study of how firms manage these factors/drivers and control their negative effects. The nature of the practices and actions used to manage important risks depends on the characteristics of the companies, their size, resources and the products they outsource.

A modified ANP and fuzzy inference system based approach for risk assessment of in-house and third party e-procurement systems
Ramkumar M.
Purpose
The increasing complexity and dynamism of new technology implemented or to implement have imposed substantial uncertainties and subjectivities in the risk assessment process. This paper aims to present a risk assessment methodology for e-procurement implementation based on modified analytic network process (ANP) coupled with fuzzy inference systems.
Design/methodology/approach
ANP is modified in such a way that the experts can provide necessary data precise numerical value, a range of numerical values, a linguistic term or a fuzzy number. The proposed methodology incorporates knowledge and judgements obtained from experts to carry out identification of risk factors and to assess the risk magnitude of the identified risk factors based on factor index, risk likelihood and risk severity.
Findings
Risk magnitude of third party systems are found to be minor with a belief of 100 per cent, and for in-house systems, the risk is found to be between minor with a belief of 30 per cent and major of 70 per cent. The results indicate that by using the proposed methodology, the technological risk assessment of new technology can be done effectively and efficiently.
Research limitations/implications
Using the results of this study, the practitioners can better know the pros and cons of implementing both in-house and third party e-procurement systems.
Originality/value
The modified ANP is used mainly to structure and prioritize the diverse risk factors. Finally, an illustrative example on technological risk assessment of both in-house and third party e-procurement systems is used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed methodology in real life situations.

Outsourcing in the Persian Gulf petroleum supply chain
Modarress B., Ansari A., Thies E.
Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to identify the challenges, the benefits, the risks and the motives of petroleum companies in the Persian Gulf toward outsourcing strategy. While the petroleum companies are faced with massive costs of operation that stem from the aging infrastructure, human capital deficit, inefficient fragmented business processes and lack of access to new technologies, outsourcing strategy toward cost savings and the overt and covert resistance of management and employees are significant barriers for creation of continuous process.
Design/methodology/approach
– Based on the review of existing literature, the industry
'
s archives and in-depth personal interviews with senior executives of the national oil and gas companies in five Gulf countries and seven global outsourcing companies and 87 survey responses, this study develops a methodological framework which substantiates or refutes the hypotheses based on the objectives: industry challenges are the driving forces behind outsourcing strategy; the potential risks of cost savings of outsourcing outweigh the consequential loss in control over the product or service, companies
'
safety and security of the region.
Findings
– The findings indicate that the oil and gas exporters have mixed but broad positive view of outsourcing strategy. While outsourcing could provide savings across the entire supply chain, it also generates a distracting resistance due to the fear of unknown in a complex range of culture, infrastructures and sequential processes that requires resiliency for continuity of operations.
Originality/value
– This study is the first of its kind in the Persian Gulf oil and gas industry investigating the implementation of outsourcing strategy. The result of this investigation reveals the compromise between the potential benefits in cost reduction and the security of petroleum supply. This study contributes to all who are in the industry or who are involved with it to share a clear assessment of the future.

IT outsourcing management in Poland – trends and performance
Sobinska M., Willcocks L.
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to find how mature the Polish commercial production companies are in their information technology (IT) sourcing practices, what they do, the practices that are successful, the challenges experienced and the outcomes.The paper presents and critically evaluates the results of a study of IT outsourcing management processes in selected industrial enterprises operating in Poland. Dynamic business contexts, globalisation and advances in IT make the development of IT sourcing models challenging in both theory and practice. This paper examines the principles and practice of sourcing IT and business processes in Poland, a country much under-represented in the literature. Little research has been conducted on the strategic rationale behind IT sourcing decisions, the resulting challenges and the potential or actual consequences of such decisions. This paper addresses these gaps in the understanding of IT sourcing processes by way of examining the types of sourcing models and solutions among manufacturing companies operating in Poland, and by identifying the most problematic and critical factors in effective IT sourcing collaborations. The outcomes are assessed against findings from the broader empirical outsourcing literature, and lessons are drawn for Polish client firms and those in similar economies.
Design/methodology/approach
– A survey methodology of a limited number of organisations in Poland was used. The study was designed to address the process of managing IT sourcing relations in production companies operating in Poland. The main objective of the study was to formulate working hypotheses to be used in further research on the sourcing models used in the IT sphere. Additionally, the study was designed to provide information on: the potential respondent reactions to the research problem, the understanding of the notions and terms used in the survey questionnaire and the evaluation of the research instrument itself.
Findings
– Organisations (and their employees) are generally well aware of their IT needs, and that they select quite well providers that suit their particular requirements. In their selection processes, organisations carefully consider not only the providers’ experience and the range of services on offer but also their flexibility in response to the client’s demands, the location and the trust formed in the course of previous cooperation. Communication between the parties typically takes the form of telephone conversations and e-mails. The majority of respondents reported more than one type of problems faced in the course of outsourcing. Problems concentrated in the areas of communication (52 per cent) and organisation (48 per cent), followed by difficulties in enforcing the terms of the contract.
Research limitations/implications
– It is a selective sample, focuses only on production companies and does not look at the offshore outsourcing market that has grown up in Poland, but rather what domestic polish organisations do in their sourcing practices.
Practical implications
– The organisations still struggle with the organisation and management of relations with their external service providers while getting reasonable results. They have much to learn from the published literature on managing the outsourcing life cycle.
Social implications
– There is a need for better inter-organisational cooperation.
Originality/value
– Poland is very underrepresented in the outsourcing literature – there are no examples of surveys like this in the English literature.

Open innovation: an analysis of twelve years of research
Hossain M., Anees-ur-Rehman M.
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore patterns and developments in the open innovation literature.
Design/methodology/approach
– A bibliometric analysis was performed by classifying 411 articles in a range of key attributes.
Findings
– Europe (61 per cent) as a region of data source was higher than all other regions together. As a unit of analysis, firm level (65 per cent) was more than all other levels together. Qualitative studies were mostly case-based, and quantitative studies were largely based on survey and panel data. Regression was a widely used analytical technique.
Originality/value
– The authors identified avenues to address overlooked research topics, increase cross-continental collaboration, diversity of research methods beyond case study and survey, etc. Based on findings, the authors outlined some future research directions.

Governance structure in IT outsourcing: a network perspective
Lin T., Hekkala R.
Purpose– The governance of information technology outsourcing (ITO) has been identified as an essential determinant for ITO success. Prior studies have shed light on effective governance structures in different organizational contexts. This study aims to advance this prior knowledge by exploring how interpersonal networks, as an important aspect of such context, reflect and influence ITO governance.Design/methodology/approach– A single case study was conducted from a vendor’s perspective in an ITO dyad. Social network analysis was leveraged to reveal the interpersonal networks, with whole-network analysis on 24 team members in an ITO vendor company. In addition, open-ended interviews with six selected team members were utilized to identify the perceived governance structure.Findings– The findings of this study suggest certain features of interpersonal networks, i.e. network density and cross-network comparison, can reflect governance structure in multiple aspects. Meanwhile, the authors also argue that interpersonal networks can influence the form of governance structure.Research limitations/implications– As a single case study, the context of the research site cannot be ignored in the inference of findings. To increase the confidence for further generalization, future empirical studies are needed especially in contrasting sites, such as ITO relations based on network governance.Originality/value– This study associates intra-organizational characteristics of the vendor to the inter-organizational governance structure of the ITO relationship. It also provides an innovative methodology for both researchers and practitioners to assess ITO governance structure.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
Journal of Public Procurement
741 citations, 17.13%
|
|
Sustainability
129 citations, 2.98%
|
|
Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
98 citations, 2.27%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
96 citations, 2.22%
|
|
International Journal of Public Sector Management
89 citations, 2.06%
|
|
International Journal of Public Administration
76 citations, 1.76%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
72 citations, 1.66%
|
|
Public Money and Management
37 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Public Management Review
37 citations, 0.86%
|
|
International Journal of Construction Management
35 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Public Administration and Public Policy
33 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
31 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
29 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
27 citations, 0.62%
|
|
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
26 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Buildings
26 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Science and Public Policy
26 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
25 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Benchmarking
23 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
22 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
20 citations, 0.46%
|
|
International Journal of Production Economics
20 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Supply Chain Management
18 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Public Works Management and Policy
18 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development
18 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
17 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology
17 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Local Government Studies
16 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy
16 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Public Performance & Management Review
16 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
15 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
15 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Canadian Public Administration
14 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
14 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Construction Innovation
14 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
IIMBG Journal of Sustainable Business and Innovation
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
12 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Public Administration Review
12 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Revista Espanola de Financiacion y Contabilidad
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Government Information Quarterly
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Production Research
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SAGE Open
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
PLoS ONE
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Outsourcing Management for Supply Chain Operations and Logistics Service
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SAM Advanced Management Journal
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Ecological Economics
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Technovation
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Management Matters
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Review of Public Administration
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Environment Systems and Decisions
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Supply Chain Management
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Construction Management and Economics
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Production Planning and Control
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Voprosy Ekonomiki
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of European Integration
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Environment and Planning C Government and Policy
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Public Organization Review
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Small Business Journal
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Heliyon
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Research for Development
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Review of Black Political Economy
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478)
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Information Technology and People
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Wood Material Science and Engineering
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Business Process Management Journal
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Studies in Systems, Decision and Control
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
European Business Review
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Management Decision
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Sustainable Development
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Management and Labour Studies
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Money and Business
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
LBS Journal of Management & Research
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Corporate Communications
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Strategic Change
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Business Strategy and the Environment
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Economies
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
Emerald
1394 citations, 32.22%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
521 citations, 12.04%
|
|
Elsevier
478 citations, 11.05%
|
|
Springer Nature
356 citations, 8.23%
|
|
MDPI
209 citations, 4.83%
|
|
Wiley
169 citations, 3.91%
|
|
SAGE
141 citations, 3.26%
|
|
IGI Global
108 citations, 2.5%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
93 citations, 2.15%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
85 citations, 1.96%
|
|
Oxford University Press
45 citations, 1.04%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
33 citations, 0.76%
|
|
IOP Publishing
24 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
23 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
22 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
17 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
14 citations, 0.32%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
14 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
AOSIS
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
IntechOpen
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
EDP Sciences
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
AIP Publishing
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
CAIRN
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Thomas Telford
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
World Scientific
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Vysoka Skola Ekonomicka
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Academic Journals
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
F1000 Research
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Publishing House Science
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Omsk State University
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Accounting Association
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Economic Association
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Unisa Press
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Faculty of Sociel Sciences, Charles Universtiy
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Sirey
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
JMIR Publications
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOS Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
MIT Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Editura ASE Bucuresti
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
School of Engineering, Auckland University of Technology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Management
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Institut fur Afrika-Kunde
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
U.S. Agency for International Development
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Association of Professional Managers in South Africa
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Publishing House Akademperiodyka
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Nordic Open Scholarly Publishing (NOASP)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Infra-M Academic Publishing House
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
AMH International Conferences and Seminars Organizing LLC
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Universitas Gadjah Mada
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Narxoz University - Non-profit joint stock company
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Ural State University of Economics
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (53 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
13 publications, 3.33%
|
|
University of Twente
7 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Makerere University
7 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Florida State University
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Catania
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Curtin University
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Central Florida
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Oakland University
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
St. Cloud State University
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Cardiff University
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Western Kentucky University
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Umeå University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Örebro University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Warwick
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Finnish Environment Institute
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Birmingham
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Eastern Illinois University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of South Florida
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Dublin City University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of the Bundeswehr Munich
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Open University of the Netherlands
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Louisiana State University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Old Dominion University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Tehran University of Art
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Gazi University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
International Islamic University Malaysia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Tampere University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Aalto University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Södertörn University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Oulu
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Liverpool
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Bergen
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Maastricht University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Nottingham
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Loughborough University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Florence
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Bari
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Salerno
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Brescia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Siena
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Qingdao University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Ferrara
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Iowa State University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Free International University of Social Studies "Guido Carli"
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Charles University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Deakin University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
La Trobe University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Central Queensland University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of New England
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Stanford University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of the Western Cape
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Ahmadu Bello University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Korea University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Catholic University of Korea
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Kyambogo University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Colorado State University Pueblo
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
George Mason University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
West Virginia University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Dodoma
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Harvard University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Makerere University
2 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Cardiff University
2 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Tehran University of Art
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Gazi University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
International Islamic University Malaysia
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Tampere University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Aalto University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Södertörn University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Finnish Environment Institute
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Free International University of Social Studies "Guido Carli"
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Deakin University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Stanford University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Kyambogo University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Dodoma
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Seoul Women's University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Ghana
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Cape Coast
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Takoradi Technical University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
International Hellenic University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Utrecht University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Almería
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Leeds Beckett University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Open University of the Netherlands
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Sussex
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Cranfield University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Old Dominion University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Portland State University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Ibn Zohr University
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
International University of Rabat
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Carthage
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University College Dublin
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
University of Salford
1 publication, 1.01%
|
|
Show all (26 more) | |
1
2
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
USA
|
USA, 88, 22.56%
USA
88 publications, 22.56%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 28, 7.18%
Italy
28 publications, 7.18%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 17, 4.36%
United Kingdom
17 publications, 4.36%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 13, 3.33%
Netherlands
13 publications, 3.33%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 11, 2.82%
Australia
11 publications, 2.82%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 9, 2.31%
Uganda
9 publications, 2.31%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 9, 2.31%
Philippines
9 publications, 2.31%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 2.31%
Finland
9 publications, 2.31%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 8, 2.05%
Sweden
8 publications, 2.05%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 7, 1.79%
Germany
7 publications, 1.79%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 1.54%
Spain
6 publications, 1.54%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 5, 1.28%
Ghana
5 publications, 1.28%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 1.28%
Greece
5 publications, 1.28%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 1.28%
Norway
5 publications, 1.28%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 4, 1.03%
Russia
4 publications, 1.03%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 4, 1.03%
Denmark
4 publications, 1.03%
|
India
|
India, 4, 1.03%
India
4 publications, 1.03%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 1.03%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 1.03%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.77%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.77%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 3, 0.77%
Tanzania
3 publications, 0.77%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.51%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 2, 0.51%
Brunei
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 2, 0.51%
Canada
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.51%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.51%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.51%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.51%
Romania
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.51%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.51%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.51%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.51%
Chile
2 publications, 0.51%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.51%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.51%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.26%
France
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.26%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.26%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.26%
China
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.26%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.26%
Austria
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.26%
Benin
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.26%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.26%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.26%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.26%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.26%
Iran
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.26%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.26%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.26%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.26%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.26%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.26%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.26%
Poland
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.26%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Togo
|
Togo, 1, 0.26%
Togo
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.26%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.26%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.26%
Japan
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Show all (25 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
1
2
3
4
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 4, 4.04%
United Kingdom
4 publications, 4.04%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 4, 4.04%
Ghana
4 publications, 4.04%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 4, 4.04%
Finland
4 publications, 4.04%
|
USA
|
USA, 3, 3.03%
USA
3 publications, 3.03%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 3.03%
Italy
3 publications, 3.03%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 3.03%
Netherlands
3 publications, 3.03%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 3, 3.03%
Uganda
3 publications, 3.03%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 3.03%
Sweden
3 publications, 3.03%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 2.02%
Australia
2 publications, 2.02%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 2.02%
Greece
2 publications, 2.02%
|
India
|
India, 2, 2.02%
India
2 publications, 2.02%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 2.02%
Spain
2 publications, 2.02%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 2.02%
Norway
2 publications, 2.02%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 2.02%
Pakistan
2 publications, 2.02%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 2.02%
Romania
2 publications, 2.02%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 1.01%
Germany
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 1.01%
Portugal
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 1.01%
Brazil
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 1.01%
Denmark
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 1.01%
Iran
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 1.01%
Malaysia
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 1.01%
Morocco
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 1.01%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 1.01%
Tanzania
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 1.01%
Tunisia
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 1.01%
Turkey
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 1.01%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 1.01%
Chile
1 publication, 1.01%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 1.01%
Switzerland
1 publication, 1.01%
|
1
2
3
4
|