Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.9
SJR
0.813
CiteScore
4.2
Categories
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Nutrition and Dietetics
Areas
Medicine
Nursing
Years of issue
2016-2025
journal names
Obesity Science and Practice
OBES SCI PRACT
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations

Brown University
(42 publications)

University of Florida
(18 publications)

Johns Hopkins University
(17 publications)

Brown University
(18 publications)

University of Florida
(12 publications)

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
(11 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1693
Q1

Magnetohydrodynamics in liquid metal interfacial flows
Ni M., Yang J., Zhang D.J.
Abstract
Liquid metal interfacial flows occur in the fields of nuclear fusion and electromagnetic metallurgy. Due to the electrically conductive characteristics of the liquid metal, the presence of magnetic fields in these application scenarios has significant impacts on the interfacial flow behaviors. Then typical interfacial flows under the influence of magnetic fields, such as the free surface liquid metal flow, the liquid metal droplet impacting problems, and the bubble motion in liquid metal, are discussed in the present review. We comprehensively illustrate the flow characteristics of free surface liquid metal flow, the spreading of liquid metal droplets impacting onto solid or liquid surfaces, outcomes of collisions between metal droplets, and bubble dynamics in liquid metal, under the influence of magnetic fields along different directions. Meanwhile, we briefly review the current concepts of liquid metal free surface flow for the plasma facing comonents (PFCs) in fusion reactors and finally make a summary for the open questions related to the fundamental research and industrial applications of interfacial flow magnetohydrodynamics in the future.
Q1

Size-Dependent Effects and Surface Roughness in Contact Mechanics
Li C., Liang X., Yuan W., Ding Y., Wang G.
Abstract
With the increasing miniaturization of mechanical systems and the prevalence of rough surfaces in engineering applications, understanding and accurately characterizing the contact response at small scales has become crucial. This review article provides a comprehensive analysis of two significant aspects in the field of contact mechanics: the size-dependent response of single asperity due to strain gradients and surface effects, and the contact behavior of rough surfaces. The former forms the foundation for the latter analysis, as real surfaces are inherently rough and contact occurs at discrete asperities. At the microscale, strain gradients play a dominant role, as classical continuum mechanics fails to account for the intrinsic material length. Further downscaling to the nanoscale highlights the importance of surface effects due to the large surface-to-bulk ratio. The first section examines these distinct size-dependent effects and their implications for contact mechanics across different scales. The second section further focuses on the contact of rough surfaces, highlighting incremental contact models, contact behavior at large contact fraction where asperity interactions are significant, adhesive rough contact in soft materials, and experimental advances that improve the understanding and validation of these models. Together, these two topics underscore the need for refined theoretical and experimental approaches to accurately model and predict the contact behavior at small scales and with realistic multi-scale roughness.
Q1

Mechanical Properties Inside Origami-Inspired Structures: An Overview
Yan P., Huang H., Meloni M., Li B., Cai J.
Abstract
In recent decades, origami has transitioned from a traditional art form into a systematic field of scientific inquiry, characterized by attributes such as high foldability, lightweight frameworks, diverse deformation modes, and limited degrees-of-freedom. Despite the abundant literature on smart materials, actuation methods, design principles, and manufacturing techniques, comprehensive reviews focusing on the mechanical properties of origami-inspired structures are relatively rare and unsystematic. This review aims to fill this void by analyzing and summarizing the significant studies conducted on the mechanical properties of origami-inspired structures from 2013 to 2023. We begin with an overview that includes essential definitions of origami, classical origami patterns, and their associated tessellated or stacked structures. Following this, we delve into the principal dynamic modeling method for origami and conduct an in-depth analysis of the key mechanical properties of origami-inspired structures. These properties include tunable stiffness, bistability and multistability, metamechanical properties demonstrated by origami-based metamaterials, and bio-inspired mechanical properties. Finally, we conclude with a comprehensive summary that discusses the current challenges and future directions in the field of origami-inspired structures. Our review provides a thorough synthesis of both the mechanical properties and practical applications of origami-inspired structures, aiming to serve as a reference and stimulate further research.
Q1

Reduced and All-at-Once Approaches for Model Calibration and Discovery in Computational Solid Mechanics
Römer U., Hartmann S., Tröger J., Anton D., Wessels H., Flaschel M., De Lorenzis L.
Abstract
In the framework of solid mechanics, the task of deriving material parameters from experimental data has recently re-emerged with the progress in full-field measurement capabilities and the renewed advances of machine learning. In this context, new methods such as the virtual fields method and physics-informed neural networks have been developed as alternatives to the already established least-squares and finite element-based approaches. Moreover, model discovery problems are emerging and can also be addressed in a parameter estimation framework.
These developments call for a new unified perspective, which is able to cover both traditional parameter estimation methods and novel approaches in which the state variables or the model structure itself are inferred as well.
Adopting concepts discussed in the inverse problems community, we distinguish between all-at-once and reduced approaches. With this general framework, we are able to structure a large portion of the literature on parameter estimation in computational mechanics -- and we can identify combinations that have not yet been addressed, two of which are proposed in this paper.
We also discuss statistical approaches to quantify the uncertainty related to the estimated parameters, and we propose a novel two-step procedure for identification of complex material models based on both frequentist and Bayesian principles.
Finally, we illustrate and compare several of the aforementioned methods with mechanical benchmarks based on synthetic and experimental data.
Q1

Fracture Mechanics of Magnetoelectroelastic Materials and Structures: State of the Art and Prospects
Feng W., Yan Z., Ma P., Lv C., Zhang C.
Abstract
Magnetoelectroelastic (MEE) materials and structures have been extensively applied in MEE devices such as sensors and transducers, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and smart structures. In order to assess the strength and durability of such materials and structures, exhaustive theoretical and numerical investigations have been conducted over the past two decades. The main purpose of this paper is to present a state-of-the-art review and a critical discussion on the research of the MEE fracture mechanics. Following an introduction, the basic theory of the fracture mechanics in the linear magnetoelectroelasticity is explained with special emphasis on the constitutive equations related to different fracture modes, magnetoelectrical (ME) crack-face boundary conditions and fracture parameters for 2D plane problems. Then, the state of the art of the research on the fracture mechanics of the MEE materials and structures is reviewed and summarized, including 2D anti-plane and in-plane as well as 3D analyses under both static and dynamic loadings. The ME effects on the fracture parameters are revealed and discussed. Moreover, numerical investigations based on the finite element method (FEM), boundary element method (BEM), meshless methods and other novel methods are also reviewed for MEE fracture problems. Finally, some conclusions are drawn with several prospects to open questions and demanding future research topics. In particular, experimental observations are urgently needed to verify the validity of the theoretical predictions of the various fracture criteria. Another great challenge is to tackle the non-linear phenomena and domain switching in the fracture process zone.
Q1

Statistical Scaling in Localization-Induced Failures
Le J.
Abstract
The investigation of statistical scaling in localization-induced failures dates back to da Vinci's speculation on the length effect on rope strength in 1500 s. The early mathematical description of statistical scaling emerged with the birth of the extreme value statistics. The most commonly known mathematical model for statistical scaling is the Weibull size effect, which is a direct consequence of the infinite weakest-link model. However, abundant experimental observations on various localization-induced failures have shown that the Weibull size effect is inadequate. Over the last two decades, two mathematical models were developed to describe the statistical size effect in localization-induced failures. One is the finite weakest-link model, in which the random structural resistance is expressed as the minimum of a set of independent discrete random variables. The other is the level excursion model, a continuum description of the finite weakest-link model, in which the structural failure probability is calculated as the probability of the upcrossing of a random field over a barrier. This paper reviews the mathematical formulation of these two models and their applications to various engineering problems including the strength distributions of quasi-brittle structures, failure statistics of micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) devices, breakdown statistics of high– k gate dielectrics, and probability distribution of buckling pressure of spherical shells containing random geometric imperfections. In addition, the implications of statistical scaling for the stochastic finite element simulations and the reliability-based structural design are discussed. In particular, the recent development of the size-dependent safety factors is reviewed.
Q1

Nonlinear Normal Modes of Vibrating Mechanical Systems: 10 Years of Progress
Mikhlin Y., Avramov K.V.
Abstract
This paper contains review of the theory and applications of nonlinear normal modes, which are developed during last decade. This review has more than 200 references. It is a continuation of two previous review papers of the same authors (Mikhlin Y.V., Avramov K.V.: Nonlinear normal modes for vibrating mechanical systems. Review of Theoretical Developments. Appl. Mech. Rev. 63, 060802 (2010); Avramov, K.V., Mikhlin, Yu.V.: Review of applications of nonlinear normal modes for vibrating mechanical systems. Appl. Mech. Rev. 65, 020801 (2013)). The following theoretical issues of nonlinear normal modes are treated: basic concepts and definitions; application of the normal forms theory for nonlinear modes construction; nonlinear modes in finite degrees of freedom systems; resonances and bifurcations; reduced-order modelling; nonlinear modes in stochastic dynamical systems; numerical methods; identification of mechanical systems using nonlinear modes. The following applied issues of this theory are treated in this review: experimental measurement of nonlinear modes; nonlinear modes in continuous systems; engineering applications (aerospace engineering, power engineering, piecewise-linear systems and structures with dry friction); nonlinear modes in nanostructures and physical systems; targeted energy transfer and absorption problem.
Q1

A Comprehensive Review of Indentation of Gels and Soft Biological Materials
He D., Malu D., Hu Y.
Abstract
Indentation measurement has emerged as a widely adapted technique for elucidating the mechanical properties of soft hydrated materials. These materials, encompassing gels, cells, and biological tissues, possess pivotal mechanical characteristics crucial for a myriad of applications across engineering and biological realms. From engineering endeavors to biological processes linked to both normal physiological activity and pathological conditions, understanding the mechanical behavior of soft hydrated materials is paramount. The indentation method is particularly suitable for accessing the mechanical properties of these materials as it offers the ability to conduct assessments in liquid environment across diverse length and time scales with minimal sample preparation. Nonetheless, understanding the physical principles underpinning indentation testing and the corresponding contact mechanics theories, making judicious choices regarding indentation testing methods and associated experimental parameters, and accurately interpreting the experimental results are challenging tasks. In this review, we delve into the methodology and applications of indentation in assessing the mechanical properties of soft hydrated materials, spanning elastic, viscoelastic, poroelastic, coupled viscoporoelastic, and adhesion properties, as well as fracture toughness. Each category is accomplished by the theoretical models elucidating underlying physics, followed by ensuring discussions on experimental setup requirements. Furthermore, we consolidate recent advancements in indentation measurements for soft hydrated materials highlighting its multifaceted applications. Looking forward, we offer insights into the future trajectory of the indentation method on soft hydrated materials and the potential applications. This comprehensive review aims to furnish readers with a profound understanding of indentation techniques and a pragmatic roadmap of characterizing the mechanical properties of soft hydrated materials.
Q1

Acoustic Emission in Ceramic Matrix Composites
Tulshibagwale N., Brodnik N., Muir C., Hilmas A., Kiser J., Smith C., Almansour A., Presby M., Daly S.H.
Abstract
The integration of ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) into safety-critical applications, such as turbine engines and aerospace structures, necessitates a sound understanding of their expected damage evolution under in-service conditions and real-time health-monitoring methods to assess their damage state. The measurement of acoustic emissions (AEs), the transient elastic waves emitted during damage formation, offers an enhanced capability for evaluating damage evolution and structural health in CMCs due to its high sensitivity, accurate temporal resolution, and relative ease of use compared to other nondestructive evaluation (NDE) techniques. Recent advances in numerical simulation methods and data-driven model development, in combination with improved multimodal experimental characterization methods and sensor hardware, are rapidly advancing AE to a mature technique for damage quantification. This review discusses the fundamental principles of acoustic emissions, provides practical guidelines on their experimental characterization and analysis, and offers perspectives on the current state-of-the-art.
Q1

MechGPT, a Language-Based Strategy for Mechanics and Materials Modeling That Connects Knowledge Across Scales, Disciplines and Modalities
Buehler M.J.
Abstract
For centuries, researchers have sought out ways to connect disparate areas of knowledge. While early scholars (Galileo, da Vinci, etc.) were experts across fields, specialization has taken hold later. With the advent of Artificial Intelligence, we can now explore relationships across areas (e.g., mechanics-biology) or disparate domains (e.g., failure mechanics-art). To achieve this, we use a fine-tuned Large Language Model (LLM), here for a subset of knowledge in multiscale materials failure. The approach includes the use of a general-purpose LLM to distill question-answer pairs from raw sources followed by LLM fine-tuning. The resulting MechGPT LLM foundation model is used in a series of computational experiments to explore its capacity for knowledge retrieval, various language tasks, hypothesis generation, and connecting knowledge across disparate areas. While the model has some ability to recall knowledge from training, we find that LLMs are particularly useful to extract structural insights through Ontological Knowledge Graphs. These interpretable graph structures provide explanatory insights, frameworks for new research questions, and visual representations of knowledge that also can be used in retrieval-augmented generation. Three versions of MechGPT are discussed, featuring different sizes from 13 billion to 70 billion parameters, and reaching context lengths of more than 10,000 tokens. This provides ample capacity for sophisticated retrieval augmented strategies, as well as agent-based modeling where multiple LLMs interact collaboratively and/or adversarially, the incorporation of new data from the literature or web searches, as well as multimodality.
Q1

Thermo-Hydro-Chemo-Mechanical (THCM) Continuum Modelling of Subsurface Rocks: A Focus On Thermodynamics-based Constitutive Models
Siddiqui M.A., Regenauer-Lieb K., Roshan H.
Abstract
Accurate multi-physics modelling is necessary to simulate and predict the long-term behaviour of subsurface porous rocks. Despite decades of modelling subsurface multi-physics processes in porous rocks, there are still considerable uncertainties and challenges remaining partly because of the way the constitutive equations describing such processes are derived (thermodynamically or phenomenologically) and treated (continuum or discrete) regardless of the way they are solved (e.g. finite-element or finite-volume methods). We review here continuum multi-physics models covering aspects of poromechanics, chemo-poromechanics, thermo-poromechanics, and thermo-chemo-poromechanics. We focus on models that are derived based on thermodynamics to signify the importance of such a basis and discuss the limitations of the phenomenological models and how thermodynamics-based modelling can overcome such limitations. The review highlights that the experimental determination of thermodynamics response coefficients (coupling or constitutive coefficients) and field applicability of the developed thermodynamics models are significant research gaps to be addressed. Verification and validation of the constitutive models, preferably through physical experiments, is yet to be comprehensively realized which is further discussed in this review. The review also shows the versatility of the multi-physics models to address issues from shale gas production to CO2 sequestration and energy storage and highlights the need for inclusion of thermodynamically consistent damage mechanics, coupling of chemical and mechanical damage and two-phase fluid flow in multi-physics models.
Q1

Multi-body Hydrodynamic Interactions in Fish-like Swimming
Timm M., Pandhare R., Masoud H.
Abstract
Many animals in nature travel in groups either for protection, survival, or endurance. Among these, certain species do so under the burden of aero/hydrodynamic loads, which incites questions as to the significance of the multibody fluid-mediated interactions that are inherent to collective flying/swimming. Prime examples of such creatures are fish, which are commonly seen traveling in highly organized groups of large numbers. Indeed, over the years, there have been numerous attempts to examine hydrodynamic interactions among self-propelled fish-like swimmers. Though many have studied this phenomenon, their motivations have varied from understanding animal behavior to extracting universal fluid dynamical principles and transplanting them into engineering applications. The approaches utilized to carry out these investigations include theoretical and computational analyses, field observations, and experiments using various abstractions of biological fish. Here, we compile representative investigations focused on the collective hydrodynamics of fish-like swimmers. The selected body of works are reviewed in the context of their methodologies and findings, so as to draw parallels, contrast differences, and highlight open questions. Overall, the results of the surveyed studies provide foundational insights into the conditions (such as the relative positioning and synchronization between the members, as well as their swimming kinematics and speed) under which hydrodynamic interactions can lead to efficiency gains and/or group cohesion in two- and three-dimensional scenarios. They also shed some light on the mechanisms responsible for such energetic and stability enhancements in the context of wake-body, wake-wake, and body-body interactions.
Q1

A Comprehensive Review On the Novel Principles, Development and Applications of Triboelectric Nanogenerators
Hurdoganoglu D., Safaei B., Cheng J., Qin Z., Sahmani S.
Abstract
The primary objective of this research is to present a comprehensive discussion on the fundamental concepts, innovations, and applications of triboelectric nanogenerators. It describes the various triboelectric nanogenerators' modes and mechanisms. Here, materials and associated development that exhibit triboelectric properties are also examined. Additionally, various triboelectric nanogenerator applications have been discussed. Triboelectric nanogenerators, a revolutionary power generation technology, were introduced in 2012 and are characterized as devices that efficiently generate electrical energy from kinetic energy in the environment. The development of triboelectric nanogenerators has advanced significantly since the invention of this innovative power-generation technology. Moreover, in order to provide a deeper understanding of the technology, the modes include Freestanding Triboelectric-Layer, Single-Electrode, Lateral Sliding, and Vertical Contact-Separation Modes as well as their operating mechanism have been thoroughly examined. Likewise, this study describes and offers concepts for future research on the important applications of TENGs, including high voltage power supply, blue energy, self-power sensors, and micro/nano energy. In conclusion, triboelectric nanogenerator is a crucial and alluring technology with the benefits of low cost, simple structure, easy fabrication, high efficiency, and relatively high output energy. Since a broad range of materials can be adopted, scientists can apply this cutting-edge technology in novel ways. For a more comprehensive understanding of this innovative and ground-breaking technology, numerous fundamental scientific considerations and limitations are also addressed.
Q1

Recent Advances and Applications of Machine Learning in Experimental Solid Mechanics: A Review
Jin H., Zhang E., Espinosa H.D.
Abstract
For many decades, experimental solid mechanics has played a crucial role in characterizing and understanding the mechanical properties of natural and novel artificial materials. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) provide new opportunities for the field, including experimental design, data analysis, uncertainty quantification, and inverse problems. As the number of papers published in recent years in this emerging field is growing exponentially, it is timely to conduct a comprehensive and up-to-date review of recent ML applications in experimental solid mechanics. Here, we first provide an overview of common ML algorithms and terminologies that are pertinent to this review, with emphasis placed on physics-informed and physics-based ML methods. Then, we provide thorough coverage of recent ML applications in traditional and emerging areas of experimental mechanics, including fracture mechanics, biomechanics, nano- and micromechanics, architected materials, and two-dimensional materials. Finally, we highlight some current challenges of applying ML to multimodality and multifidelity experimental datasets, quantifying the uncertainty of ML predictions, and proposing several future research directions. This review aims to provide valuable insights into the use of ML methods and a variety of examples for researchers in solid mechanics to integrate into their experiments.
Q1

Krylov Methods for Large-Scale Dynamical Systems: Application in Fluid Dynamics
Frantz R.A., Loiseau J., Robinet J.
Abstract
The ability to predict and characterize bifurcations from the onset of unsteadiness to the transition to turbulence is of critical importance in both academic and industrial applications. Numerous tools from dynamical system theory can be employed for that purpose. In this review, we focus on the practical computation and stability analyses of steady and time-periodic solutions with a particular emphasis on very high-dimensional systems such as those resulting from the discrete Navier-Stokes equations. In addition to a didactically concise theoretical framework, we introduce nekStab, an open source and user-friendly toolbox dedicated to such analyses using the spectral element solver Nek5000. Relying on Krylov methods and a time-stepper formulation, nekStab inherits the flexibility and high performance capabilities of Nek5000 and can be used to study the stability properties of flows in complex three-dimensional geometries. The performances and accuracy of nekStab are presented on the basis of standard benchmarks from the literature. For the sake of pedagogy and clarity, most of the algorithms implemented in nekStab are presented herein using Python pseudocode. Because of its flexibility and domain-agnostic nature, the methodology presented in this work can be applied to develop similar toolboxes for other solvers, most importantly outside the field of fluid dynamics.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Nutrients
247 citations, 4.26%
|
|
Obesity Science and Practice
135 citations, 2.33%
|
|
Obesity
125 citations, 2.16%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
102 citations, 1.76%
|
|
PLoS ONE
82 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Obesity Reviews
79 citations, 1.36%
|
|
BMC Public Health
71 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Appetite
69 citations, 1.19%
|
|
International Journal of Obesity
60 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
58 citations, 1%
|
|
Obesity Surgery
56 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Scientific Reports
54 citations, 0.93%
|
|
BMJ Open
51 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
49 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
43 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Clinical obesity
41 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Current obesity reports
40 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
37 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
37 citations, 0.64%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
35 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
34 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Contemporary Clinical Trials
32 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Cureus
29 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
27 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Childhood Obesity
25 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Healthcare
25 citations, 0.43%
|
|
JMIR Formative Research
25 citations, 0.43%
|
|
JAMA network open
24 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Body Image
22 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Public Health Nutrition
22 citations, 0.38%
|
|
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
21 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Translational Behavioral Medicine
21 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Children
21 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Eating and Weight Disorders
20 citations, 0.35%
|
|
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
18 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Obesity Facts
18 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Pediatric obesity
18 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental
18 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Metabolites
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Preventive Medicine Reports
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Obesity Pillars
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Eating Behaviors
16 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
16 citations, 0.28%
|
|
British Journal of Nutrition
16 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Physiology and Behavior
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Obesity Research and Clinical Practice
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Patient Education and Counseling
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Nutrition
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Current Diabetes Reports
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Foods
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
JMIR Research Protocols
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Food Quality and Preference
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Heliyon
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Health and Place
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
12 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
12 citations, 0.21%
|
|
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
12 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
12 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Eating Disorders
12 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Obesities
12 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Diabetes Therapy
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Brain Sciences
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Diabetes Care
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Eating Disorders
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Life
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Biomedicines
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Biomolecules
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
British Journal of Health Psychology
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroscience
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Lipids in Health and Disease
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nutrition Bulletin
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
BMC Women's Health
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
The Lancet
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Preventive Medicine
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nutrition and Dietetics
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Psychology and Health
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Gastroenterology Clinics of North America
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of the Endocrine Society
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Current Developments in Nutrition
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
EClinicalMedicine
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Endocrine Practice
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of American College Health
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Elsevier
1067 citations, 18.41%
|
|
Springer Nature
1016 citations, 17.53%
|
|
Wiley
810 citations, 13.98%
|
|
MDPI
694 citations, 11.98%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
277 citations, 4.78%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
220 citations, 3.8%
|
|
JMIR Publications
144 citations, 2.48%
|
|
SAGE
142 citations, 2.45%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
123 citations, 2.12%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
99 citations, 1.71%
|
|
BMJ
99 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Oxford University Press
80 citations, 1.38%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
68 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
52 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
48 citations, 0.83%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
34 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
34 citations, 0.59%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
31 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
26 citations, 0.45%
|
|
S. Karger AG
26 citations, 0.45%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
21 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Emerald
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
16 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Physiological Society
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SciELO
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Medknow
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Human Kinetics
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IntechOpen
9 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Endocrinology Research Centre
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
PeerJ
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Silicea - Poligraf, LLC
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Korean Society for the Study of Obesity
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Annual Reviews
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Hans Publishers
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Society of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
EDP Sciences
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
King Saud University
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Royal Society
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Impact Journals
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Segmento Farma Editores
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Diabetes Association
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bioscientifica
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IGI Global
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Gazi University
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American College of Physicians
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOP Publishing
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Siberian State Medical University
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Public Health Association
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Diabetes Technology Society
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society for Occupational Health
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
F1000 Research
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SLACK
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Touch Medical Media LTD.
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
XMLink
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IMR Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
Brown University
42 publications, 6.3%
|
|
University of Florida
18 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
17 publications, 2.55%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
16 publications, 2.4%
|
|
Harvard University
15 publications, 2.25%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
14 publications, 2.1%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
14 publications, 2.1%
|
|
University of Connecticut
13 publications, 1.95%
|
|
Drexel University
12 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Minnesota
12 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Novo Nordisk
11 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Sydney
11 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
11 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
11 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Wake Forest University
11 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
10 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Temple University
10 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University College Dublin
10 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
9 publications, 1.35%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
9 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Cornell University
9 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Northwestern University
9 publications, 1.35%
|
|
University of Washington
9 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
8 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Stanford University
8 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Columbia University
8 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
8 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Toronto
8 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Ottawa
8 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Australian National University
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of New South Wales
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Yale University
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Boston University
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Duke University
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Michigan
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Calgary
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Louisiana State University
7 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Liverpool
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Western Australia
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
George Washington University
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
6 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Imperial College London
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Aarhus University
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Virginia Tech
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
5 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Uppsala University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Odense University Hospital
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Steno Diabetes Center
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Southern California
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Otago
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Deakin University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Bond University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Dalhousie University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Towson University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Tufts University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
McMaster University
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Dartmouth College
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Leeds
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Alberta
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Colorado Denver
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Children's Hospital Colorado
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
4 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Linköping University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Cambridge
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Oslo
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Kanazawa University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Nottingham
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Glasgow
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Melbourne
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Monash University
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
3 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
Brown University
18 publications, 4.38%
|
|
University of Florida
12 publications, 2.92%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
11 publications, 2.68%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
11 publications, 2.68%
|
|
Harvard University
8 publications, 1.95%
|
|
University of Minnesota
8 publications, 1.95%
|
|
University College Dublin
8 publications, 1.95%
|
|
Drexel University
7 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Cornell University
7 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
7 publications, 1.7%
|
|
University of Sydney
7 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Northwestern University
7 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Novo Nordisk
6 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Washington
6 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
6 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
6 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Temple University
6 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Connecticut
6 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
5 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Duke University
5 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
5 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
5 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
5 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Toronto
5 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Australian National University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Liverpool
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Southern California
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Stanford University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Columbia University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
George Washington University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Boston University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Tufts University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Michigan
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Ottawa
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Wake Forest University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Uppsala University
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Cambridge
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Aarhus University
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Steno Diabetes Center
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Nottingham
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Western Australia
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
McMaster University
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Calgary
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Children's Hospital Colorado
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Utah Health
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Hospital for Sick Children
3 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Gonabad University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Hamad Medical Corporation
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Kuwait University
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Linköping University
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Örebro University
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Western Sydney University
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Imperial College London
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Warwick
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Aarhus University Hospital
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Oslo
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Bergen
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Kanazawa University
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Florida State University
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Southampton
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Tasmania
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
2 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
USA
|
USA, 405, 60.72%
USA
405 publications, 60.72%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 52, 7.8%
United Kingdom
52 publications, 7.8%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 44, 6.6%
Australia
44 publications, 6.6%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 38, 5.7%
Canada
38 publications, 5.7%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 25, 3.75%
Denmark
25 publications, 3.75%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 25, 3.75%
Sweden
25 publications, 3.75%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 21, 3.15%
Japan
21 publications, 3.15%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 17, 2.55%
Iran
17 publications, 2.55%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 13, 1.95%
Germany
13 publications, 1.95%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 13, 1.95%
Netherlands
13 publications, 1.95%
|
China
|
China, 12, 1.8%
China
12 publications, 1.8%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 1.65%
Ireland
11 publications, 1.65%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 11, 1.65%
Italy
11 publications, 1.65%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 9, 1.35%
Norway
9 publications, 1.35%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 7, 1.05%
Mexico
7 publications, 1.05%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 5, 0.75%
Bangladesh
5 publications, 0.75%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 5, 0.75%
Brazil
5 publications, 0.75%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 5, 0.75%
Israel
5 publications, 0.75%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 5, 0.75%
New Zealand
5 publications, 0.75%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 5, 0.75%
Finland
5 publications, 0.75%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 4, 0.6%
Austria
4 publications, 0.6%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 4, 0.6%
Spain
4 publications, 0.6%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 4, 0.6%
Kuwait
4 publications, 0.6%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 0.6%
South Africa
4 publications, 0.6%
|
France
|
France, 3, 0.45%
France
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.45%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.45%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.45%
India
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.45%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.45%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.45%
UAE
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.45%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.45%
Switzerland
3 publications, 0.45%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.3%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 2, 0.3%
Benin
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 2, 0.3%
Zambia
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.3%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.3%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.3%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.3%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.3%
Chile
2 publications, 0.3%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.15%
Russia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.15%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.15%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.15%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Virgin Islands, U.S.
|
Virgin Islands, U.S., 1, 0.15%
Virgin Islands, U.S.
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.15%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.15%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.15%
Greece
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.15%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.15%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.15%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.15%
Malta
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.15%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.15%
Peru
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.15%
Poland
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.15%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.15%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.15%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.15%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.15%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Show all (29 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
USA
|
USA, 237, 57.66%
USA
237 publications, 57.66%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 38, 9.25%
United Kingdom
38 publications, 9.25%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 24, 5.84%
Australia
24 publications, 5.84%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 20, 4.87%
Canada
20 publications, 4.87%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 17, 4.14%
Iran
17 publications, 4.14%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 17, 4.14%
Sweden
17 publications, 4.14%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 15, 3.65%
Denmark
15 publications, 3.65%
|
China
|
China, 11, 2.68%
China
11 publications, 2.68%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 10, 2.43%
Germany
10 publications, 2.43%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 9, 2.19%
Japan
9 publications, 2.19%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 8, 1.95%
Ireland
8 publications, 1.95%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 8, 1.95%
Netherlands
8 publications, 1.95%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 7, 1.7%
Mexico
7 publications, 1.7%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 6, 1.46%
Italy
6 publications, 1.46%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 6, 1.46%
Norway
6 publications, 1.46%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 4, 0.97%
Kuwait
4 publications, 0.97%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 3, 0.73%
Bangladesh
3 publications, 0.73%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.73%
Israel
3 publications, 0.73%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.49%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.49%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 2, 0.49%
Zambia
2 publications, 0.49%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.49%
India
2 publications, 0.49%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.49%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.49%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.49%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.49%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.49%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.49%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.49%
UAE
2 publications, 0.49%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.49%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.49%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.49%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.49%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.49%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.49%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.49%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.49%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.24%
Russia
1 publication, 0.24%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.24%
France
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.24%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.24%
Austria
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.24%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.24%
Benin
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.24%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.24%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.24%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.24%
Spain
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.24%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.24%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.24%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.24%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.24%
Finland
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.24%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Show all (15 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
2 profile journal articles
Takamura Toshinari

Kanazawa University
264 publications,
9 402 citations
h-index: 49
1 profile journal article
Juul Jens
1 741 publications,
110 690 citations
h-index: 161