Annual Review of Phytopathology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
9.1
SJR
2.760
CiteScore
16.6
Categories
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Plant Science
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Medicine
Years of issue
1973, 1981, 1987, 1989-2024
journal names
Annual Review of Phytopathology
ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL
Top-3 citing journals

Phytopathology
(4503 citations)

Frontiers in Plant Science
(4081 citations)

Plant Disease
(3335 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of California, Davis
(42 publications)

Cornell University
(39 publications)

University of Florida
(30 publications)

University of Florida
(9 publications)

University of California, Davis
(7 publications)

Oregon State University
(6 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 4759
Q2

Physicochemical Properties and Biocompatibility of Injectable Hydroxyapatite Cement and Its Application in Compressive Tibial Plateau Fractures
Zhou X., Sun X., Chen G., Chen Y., Zhang Z., Qian Z., Zeng Q., Miao J.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTInjectable carbonated hydroxyapatite (ICHA) cement was developed by adding 2% Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) to carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHA) cement, improving its rheological properties and injectability for minimally invasive orthopedic use. The cement's physical and chemical properties, including curing time, strength, porosity, and consistency, were tested in vitro. Scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to analyze the cured cement. Bone marrow stromal cells were cultured with ICHA cement extracts and specimens to test cell growth (MTT assay) and cytotoxicity. In vivo, the cement was implanted into rabbit muscles to assess inflammation and capsule formation, along with other biocompatibility tests, including hemolysis and pyrogen testing. ICHA cement sets without heat generation, with a 9‐min initial setting time and a 15‐min final setting time, similar to CHA cement. The strength reaches 20 MPa after 1 day and peaks at 35 MPa after 7 days. Its porosity is slightly higher than CHA cement, and it resists dilution well, preventing disintegration in water. The consistency of ICHA cement is lower than CHA cement at different time points (p < 0.001), showing a logarithmic change pattern. With adjustable setting time, good resistance to dilution, and compressive strength similar to cancellous bone, ICHA cement is well suited for clinical use. Its composition closely resembles natural bone, offering strong fixation and stability for tibial plateau healing, which supports early movement and reduces the risk of joint stiffness and post‐traumatic arthritis.
Q2

Piezoelectric Biomaterials for Use in Bone Tissue Engineering—A Narrative Review
Choudhury S., Das D., Roy S., Chowdhury A.R.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTTo examine natural bone's bioelectrical traits, notably its piezoelectricity, and to look into how these characteristics influence bone growth and repair. In the context of exploring the potential of piezoelectric biomaterials, such as biopolymers and bio‐ceramics, towards orthopedic and bone regeneration applications, the research seeks to evaluate the significance of piezoelectricity‐driven osteogenesis. The paper reviews recent research on bone's electrical and dielectric properties, surface polarization/electrical stimulation effects interacting with cell activity and the effectiveness of piezoelectric biomaterials to support tissues' regenerative process. The study includes a number of materials, such as collagen, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and barium titanate. The applications of piezoelectric bio‐ceramics, piezoelectric organic polymers, and piezoelectric natural polymers are particularly highlighted. Piezoelectric biomaterials are being shown in recent studies to enhance cellular metabolism in vitro as well as promote the regeneration of tissues in vivo, especially when paired with electric field stimulation or interface polarization. Piezoelectric bio‐ceramics like magnesium silicate and barium titanate, as well as biopolymers like collagen and PVDF, have shown possibilities for orthopedic applications. However, there are several challenges regarding the manufacturing of bio‐ceramics of specific compositions having the desired properties. This review highlighted the potential of piezoelectric biomaterials in orthopedic applications with special emphasis on biopolymers and bioceramics. Therefore, these types of materials have huge potential for bone regeneration because they can mimic the piezoelectric properties of bone and allow better advances in tissue engineering or regenerative medicine. To date, little is known about their mechanism of action, and modifications are needed to improve efficacy for clinical uptake.
Q2

Effect of Tricalcium Phosphate Foam and Paste Bone Grafting Materials Designed for Improved Surgical Handling on Osteogenesis in a Sheep Scapula Model
Neckel N., Wüster J., Xiang‐Tischhauser L., Mir S., Adel‐Khattab D., Stang B., Kuhr A., Barnewitz D., Genzel A., Koerdt S., Rendenbach C., Heiland M., Nahles S., Stiller M., Knabe C.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTReconstruction of critical‐size bone defects (CSDs) with complex defect morphologies remains clinically challenging. The desire to avoid autograft harvesting has prompted an increasing quest for adequate synthetic bone grafting materials. The clinical success rates, which have been achieved with bioactive β‐tricalcium phosphate granules (TCP‐G) demonstrate that these materials have become an excellent alternative graft choice. In order to improve surgical handling properties, TCP‐G have been combined with natural polymers for creating paste‐ and foam‐like materials, which can easily be molded into any desired shape when grafting a given bony defect or deploying them with a syringe. This study assessed the effect of a TCP paste (TCP‐P) and a TCP‐foam (TCP‐F) bone grafting material as compared to TCP‐G on bone formation and osteogenic marker expression after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of implantation in CSD in the sheep scapula and tested the hypothesis that the addition of natural polymers would not diminish the osteogenic properties of TCP‐P and TCP‐F. The bone and bone graft material area fractions were determined histomorphometrically in order to quantify bone formation and bone graft material resorption. Immunohistochemical analysis of collagen type I, osteocalcin, and bone sialoprotein expression in the various cell and matrix components of the bone tissue was performed on resin‐embedded sections for characterizing the osteogenic and bioactive properties of the test materials. By 6 months, all three TCP materials facilitated excellent defect regeneration with further bone remodeling at 12 and 18 months. TCP‐F and TCP‐P induced greater osteocalcin expression and exhibited more advanced graft material resorption at 1 and 6 months, respectively. At 18 months, all three grafting materials were almost fully resorbed with the original bony architecture being restored. Taken together, the hyaluronic acid and methylcellulose components in TCP‐P and porcine collagen components in TCP‐F did not diminish the osteogenic capacity of TCP‐P and TCP‐F, which exhibited an even slightly higher resorbability and enhancement effect on OC expression by osteoblasts.
Q2

Biological Coatings: Advanced Strategies Driving Multifunctionality and Clinical Potential in Dermal Substitutes
Wu Y., Ji C., Yan Z., Fang X., Wang Y., Ma Y., Li J., Jin S., Chen H., Ji S., Zheng Y., Xiao S.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTSkin tissue defects caused by various acute and chronic etiologies frequently occur in clinical medicine. Traditional surgical repair methods have certain limitations, while dermal substitutes combined with skin grafting have become an alternative to conventional surgery. Biological coatings, by loading bioactive substances such as polysaccharides and proteins, or by using bioactive substances as carriers, can promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. This optimizes the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of the substitutes, enhances their antibacterial properties, and improves their feasibility for clinical application. This paper explores various common biological coating materials and the construction methods used in the field of dermal substitutes. It highlights the importance and necessity of biological coatings in the development of multifunctional designs for dermal substitutes. By summarizing the current research, this paper aims to offer new insights and references for the multifunctional design and clinical application of dermal substitutes.
Q2

Evaluation of Burn Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration in Animal Model Using Alginate/PVA Nanofibrous Wound Dressings Containing Dragon's Blood
Seyedi D., Salehi M., Zamani S., Cheraghali D., Dehghani F., Mehrabi M.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTThe challenge of healing burn wounds is significant importance in global healthcare systems, with a high demand for advanced wound dressings to aid in the treatment of such injuries. Promising options include bioactive electrospun scaffolds made from polymers with antimicrobial properties, which can prevent infections and promote faster healing. This study involved the creation of a nanofibrous scaffold using the electrospinning technique, which consisted of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), alginate (Alg), and Dragon's blood (DB). The scaffold was then analyzed for both its morphology and chemical composition. Results indicated that the DB was present in the nanofibrous scaffold, which had a uniform and unbranched appearance with fibers measuring approximately 300–400 nm in diameter. Additionally, mechanical property testing revealed promising results that fall within the range of human skin. The scaffold's wound healing potential was evaluated through various measurements, including water contact angle, drug release, water vapor permeability, blood compatibility, blood clotting index, and antibacterial activity. Results from an in vivo study on burn wounds showed that scaffolds containing 20% DB exhibited excellent wound healing ability with 80.3% wound closure after 21 days. This was attributed to the highest collagen synthesis, re‐epithelization and remodeling of the burned skin. Therefore, PVA/Alg/DB nanofibrous scaffolds hold promise as a wound dressing to treat burn injuries.
Q2

Synthesis and Characterization of Bioactive Glass via CTAB Modified Sol‐Gel Method for In Vitro Biological Activities
Bakare F.F., Ewente B.G., Akililu T.C., Jara A.D., Gonfa G.M.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTBone defect repair methods have significant drawbacks and limitations. The discovery and development of bioactive glasses (BGs) have greatly advanced the treatment of bone diseases. BGs can uniquely bond to living tissues, including bone, due to the formation of a hydroxyapatite (HAp) layer on their surface. These glasses synthesized using various catalysts and structure‐directing agents to enhance their biological activities. However, most catalysts generate toxicity, alter pH levels, and work at high concentrations. Similarly, many surfactants have limited surface areas, poor capacity to create well‐defined mesoporous structures, and potential toxicity, reducing the bioactivity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability of the BGs. To address these issues, this study evaluates a bioactive glass synthesized via the sol–gel process, using low concentration CTAB as a structure‐directing agent and citric acid as a catalyst. The phase composition, surface morphology, specific surface area, inner structure, crystal structure, elemental composition, and functional groups of the samples were characterized using X‐ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDS), and Fourier‐transform infrared microscopy (FTIR) techniques, respectively. The in vitro bioactivity was tested by soaking samples in simulated body fluid and analyzing the HAp layer formation using XRD, SEM, and FTIR. In addition, the in vitro biocompatibility, and an in vitro biodegradability were measured. 0.3 M of CTAB (BG3) exhibited a larger specific surface area with spherical‐shaped particles and pore volume with a mesoporous structure results better in bioactivity and biodegradability. Furthermore, all samples exhibited cell viability above 70%, indicating that the prepared materials are biocompatible. The findings highlight the potential of CTAB‐modified BGs for biomedical applications, especially in bone repair and regeneration.
Q2

Are All Alginate Dressings Equivalent?
Duciel L., Proust R., Ponsen A., Ziarelli F., Coudreuse A., Jeanmichel L., Samardzic M., Uzan G., Courtils C.D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTAlginate dressings are widely used in wound treatment for their healing and hemostatic properties and their capacity to drain exudate. However, a clear understanding of the heterogeneity within this class of dressings is lacking. Numerous sources of variability exist between alginate dressings: their composition (% of calcium alginate relative to other components), the ratio of D‐Mannuronic and L‐Guluronic acids in the alginate fraction, their purity (presence of toxic contaminants), and the shape of their fibers (surface and thickness). These parameters affect the performance and safety of alginate dressings, which may thus not be interchangeable in clinical practice. Therefore, clinicians must be aware of these differences to ensure optimal treatment and avoid complications or suboptimal healing. The objective of this study was to compare six alginate dressings to conclude or not on their equivalence. The results obtained demonstrate considerable variability between alginate dressings in the assessed characteristics: composition, Ca2+ release, level of cytotoxicity, fiber shape, draining capacity, and their resistance to traction. Algostéril, the only pure calcium alginate rich in G, releases a specific dose of Ca2+ and is the only non‐cytotoxic dressing. With its multilobed fibers that are statistically the thickest, it provides the best draining capacity and greatest resistance to traction. These results demonstrate that alginate dressings are not equivalent. Each dressing is distinct, and consequently the clinical performance of one cannot be transposed to the others. Therefore, each alginate dressing should demonstrate its own efficacy, in a given indication, through a clinical trial.
Q2

Vitamin D Screening and Supplementation—A Novel Approach to Higher Success: An Update and Review of the Current Literature
Wiedemann T.G., Jin H.W., Gallagher B., Witek L., Miron R.J., Talib H.S.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTIn recognizing the critical role of vitamin D in bone metabolism and osseointegration, research aims to identify whether preoperative vitamin D deficiency serves as a risk factor for early implant failure. By analyzing patient outcomes and their serum vitamin D levels, studies seek to establish evidence‐based recommendations for vitamin D assessment and management in the preoperative period, with the ultimate goal of enhancing implant success rates and patient outcomes in dental implantology. Given these insights, it is important for clinicians to incorporate the preoperative evaluation of vitamin D serum levels into their standard protocol for patients undergoing dental implant procedures. The objective of this study is to review and investigate the correlation between early dental implant failure (EDIF) and reduced serum levels of vitamin D, and to evaluate the potential benefits of preoperative screening and supplementation of vitamin D in patients undergoing dental implant surgery. A literature review was performed using a selected database—PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and SCOPUS—to assess the effect of vitamin D3 level on EDIF and biological factors (i.e., peri‐implant bone level). Studies were limited to peer‐reviewed, indexed journals. Subsequently, a hypothesis was proposed that vitamin D3 supplementation would mitigate the negative effect of vitamin D3 deficiency. The potential benefit of vitamin D3 supplementation—systemic and topical—was assessed in terms of bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and peri‐implant bone level. The deleterious effects of low vitamin D serum levels on osseointegration of dental implants and immune system modulation are increasingly accepted. Evidence has displayed that deficiency of this vitamin can result in impaired peri‐implant bone formation. Vitamin D deficiency resulted in nearly a fourfold increase in overall EDIF incidence. Presurgical supplementation of vitamin D3 demonstrated increased levels of implant osseointegration, increased bone–implant contact, enhanced bone level maintenance, and decreased EDIF even in at‐risk demographics (i.e., diabetic subjects). The findings of this study reinforce the role of vitamin D in dental implant osseointegration. Our study, particularly, emphasizes the necessity of vitamin D supplementation for individuals with sub‐physiologic vitamin D serum levels (≤ 30 ng/mL) and those within specific risk categories: smokers, diabetics, obese individuals, and those with compromised immune systems. Adopting a proactive management plan, including screening and supplementation in these patients, may substantially enhance the clinical outcomes in dental implant surgery.
Q2

Effect of Microporous Surface Zirconia on Mechanical Properties and Biological Behavior of Human Gingival Fibroblasts
Zhang L., He L., Wang X., Hu J., Jiang Q.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTAs a commonly used material in prosthodontics, zirconia has garnered widespread attention. Addressing the shortcomings of existing zirconia materials, this study aims to investigate the mechanical properties of microporous surface zirconia ceramics and their impact on the biological behavior of human gingival cells. Microporous surface zirconia was developed using a novel ceramic plasticity process, sintered at 1460°C for densification. The surface morphology and composition were determined through scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectrometer. Surface roughness was measured using atomic force microscopy, hydrophilicity angle was determined using a contact angle measurement instrument, and X‐ray diffractometer assessed the crystalline phase content before and after aging. Material flexural strength was determined using a universal testing machine. The influence of microporous surface zirconia on the adhesion and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) was investigated through CCK‐8 and immunofluorescence staining for Integrin β1 and F‐actin. The pore structure of microporous surface zirconia (MZ) group is uniform, with a flexural strength of 1375.86 ± 76.97 MPa, significantly higher than the control (Cont) group (p < 0.05). The percentage of HGFs adhesion to the MZ group was markedly higher than the Cont group (p < 0.05). Fluorescence of Integrin β1 and F‐actin in the MZ group was significantly higher than in the Cont group. In conclusion, Microporous surface zirconia promotes the attachment and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts, facilitating early closure of soft tissues.
Q2

In Vivo Evaluation of Thermally Drawn Biodegradable Optical Fibers as Brain Implants
Abdollahian P., Sui K., Li G., Wang J., Zhang C., Wang Y., Berg R.W., Meneghetti M., Markos C.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTOptical fiber technology plays a critical role in modern neuroscience towards understanding the complex neuronal dynamics within the nervous system. In this study, we manufactured and characterized amorphous thermally drawn poly D, L‐lactic acid (PDLLA) biodegradable optical fibers in different diameters. These optical fibers were then implanted into the lateral posterior region of the mouse brain for four months, allowing us to assess their degradation characteristics. The gradual dissolution of the implanted PDLLA optical fibers in the brain was confirmed by optical, photoacoustic, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), light propagation characteristics, and molecular weight measurements. The results indicate that the degradation rate of the biodegradable optical fiber was mainly pronounced during the first week. After four months, degradation led to the formation of micropores on the surface of the implanted fiber within the gray matter region of the brain. We believe that the PDLLA biodegradable optical fiber developed in this study constitutes a promising candidate for further functionalization and development of next‐generation biocompatible, soft, and biodegradable bi‐directional neural interfaces.
Q2

Utilization of Bulk RNA Sequencing for the Evaluation of Keratin Nanomaterials as a Coating for Percutaneous Devices
Miller A., Beck J.P., White A., Agarwal J., Bachus K.N., Jeyapalina S., Van Dyke M.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTDespite advances in the design and protocols for maintaining the skin/device interface around percutaneous devices (PDs), no current strategy ensures the permanent attachment of peri‐implant epithelial tissue to the device surface. Based on preliminary data, we hypothesized that PDs coated with keratin nanomaterials, resembling the fingernail‐nailbed interface, could provide a biochemically mediated surface that enhances epidermal cell adhesion and differentiation. To test this hypothesis, 15 Yucatan miniature pigs were each implanted with six percutaneous titanium devices, comprising three porous and three smooth devices, both with and without keratin coatings (Kerateine [iKNT] and Keratose [gKOS]). The pigs were sacrificed at 4, 8, and 16 weeks post‐implantation. The devices and surrounding tissues were harvested and analyzed using histological and RNA sequencing techniques. Compared to smooth peri‐implant tissue, porous peri‐implant tissue showed a significant decrease in epithelial downgrowth, fibrous capsule thickness, and infection rates, alongside a significant upregulation of multiple immune marker genes, including IL12B. At the 16‐week period, gKOS‐coated surfaces demonstrated a more favorable wound healing response than iKTN‐coated devices, with a reduction in granulation tissue area and a significant upregulation of several keratin genes related to differentiation. Among the combinations of surface types and coatings studied, the porous gKOS‐coated device produced the most favorable wound healing response.
Q2

Process‐Dependent Variations in the Proliferation of Myoblasts, Fibroblasts and Chondrocytes on Laser‐Sintered Polypropylene
Detsch R., Schlicht S., Nawaz Q., Boccaccini A.R., Drummer D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTAdditively manufactured polyolefins find broad applications in medical engineering, enabling the manufacturing of patient‐specific geometries. For investigating the influence of processing conditions of laser sintered locally macroporous polypropylene substrates, the response of myoblasts, chondrocytes, and fibroblasts has been characterized in this study. An influence of the applied manufacturing parameters on the attachment and viability of the investigated cells is observed, showing the effect of the superficial pore topology on the attachment and the spreading of cells. The viability and attachment of fibroblasts and chondrocytes could be improved by reducing the thermal exposure during the processing step of the dense base part, associated with increased superficial porosity and the corresponding increase of the surface area. The applied additive manufacturing process of macroporous structures influences emerging cell morphologies, leading to an extended morphological expression of chondrocytes and the overgrowth of small pores by fibroblasts. This indicates an improvement in superficial cell adhesion due to larger pores. These findings indicate the significance of the processing conditions in laser sintering of polypropylene on the cell response through the optimization of processing parameters and the attachment of an open‐cell pore structure.
Q2

Gold Nanorods (GNRs ): A Golden Nano Compass to Navigate Breast Cancer by Multimodal Imaging Approaches
Varma S., Bamb A.L., Haldar N., Gajbhiye V., Amalnerkar D., Chaudhari B.P.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTThe ongoing rise in the incidences of breast cancer cases has concerned medical and scientific personnel around the world. Adequate treatment of cancer predominantly relies on the pertinent diagnosis of the type of cancer as well as other molecular and cellular details at the initial stage only. Surprisingly, up till now, there is no single, self‐reliant imaging modality that helps to systematically find out the anatomical and functional events taking place inside the body. This resulted in the advent of the multimodal imaging concept, which encompasses the integration of complementary imaging modalities by designing multimodal imaging probes. Gold nanorods (GNRs) are extremely popular and effective nanoparticles for multimodal bioimaging due to their unique properties. Researchers have designed varieties of stable and biocompatible GNR‐based probes for targeted and nontargeted multimodal imaging of breast cancer. However, there is a lack of investigations on the in vivo fate and the toxicity of GNRs. Thus, their preclinical to clinical translation can be attained by comprehensively determining the in vivo fate and toxicity of GNRs. The review provides details about the GNRs‐based nanoprobes fabricated so far for breast cancer imaging, which, by consequent studies, can be taken up to clinical usage.
Q2

Effects of Nitrogen and Hydrogen Plasma Treatments on a Mg‐2Y‐1Zn‐1Mn Resorbable Alloy
Shekargoftar M., Ravanbakhsh S., de Oliveira V.S., Paternoster C., Chevallier P., Witte F., Sarkissian A., Mantovani D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTMg alloys have recently been investigated and optimized for the development of biodegradable implants for orthopedic, dental, vascular, and other applications. However, their rapid degradation in a physiological environment remains the main obstacle to their development. In this work, the effects of nitrogen and hydrogen plasma treatments on the surface properties and corrosion behavior of an Mg‐2Y‐1Zn‐1Mn (WZM211) alloy were investigated. Plasma treatment effectively modified the surface of a WZM211 alloy by removing the original oxide layer, followed by the formation of a new surface layer with controlled composition, thickness, and wettability. The water contact angle decreased from 100° to 17° after nitrogen plasma and to 45° after hydrogen plasma treatment. The nitrogen plasma treatment, shortly N‐Plasma, resulted in the lowest corrosion rate (CRN = 0.038 ± 0.010 mm/y) if compared with the hydrogen plasma treatment, shortly H‐Plasma (CRH = 0.044 ± 0.003 mm/y) and untreated samples (0.233 ± 0.097 mm/y). The results demonstrate the potential of nitrogen and hydrogen plasma treatment for the development of resorbable Mg‐based implants.
Q2

Physicochemical Characterization of Hyaluronic Acid‐Methylcellulose Semi‐Gels for Mitochondria Transplantation
Ahmed A.J., Gallegos Z.A., Dinar M.A., Sullivan P.G., DeRouchey J.E., Patel S.P., Rabchevsky A.G., Dziubla T.D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTTraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) presents a significant medical challenge due to its intricate nature and treatment complexities. SCI can cause physical impairments by affecting neural and motor functions as well as initiating a series of pathophysiological events exacerbating the initial trauma. Leakage from ruptured neurons and vessels disrupt ionic balance and induces excitotoxicity, leading to progressive cellular degeneration. Introducing mitochondria to the SCI lesion has shown potential in attenuating secondary injury. Mitochondria transplantation improves cellular bioenergetics and reduces concentration of reactive oxygen species achieving homeostasis and neuroprotection. Nonetheless, keeping mitochondria viable outside cell environment for a time longer than a few minutes proves to be challenging. Additionally, localized delivery to the injury site has also been limited by other factors including flow rate of cerebrospinal fluid that washes away mobilized organelle from the compromised tissue site. Previously we showed that using hyaluronic acid‐methylcellulose semi‐gels (HAMC) as a biocompatible, erodible thermogelling delivery vehicle helped to overcome some of these challenges. HAMC allows for controlled release at and around the injury site, utilizing the reverse thermogelling property of MC. Sustained release of mitochondria at slower rate can increase their uptake in spinal tissue. To better optimize the semi‐gel delivery of mitochondria requires a more complete understanding of the physicochemical properties of the HAMC semi‐gels. We have used ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy to measure optical density of HAMC semi‐gels for different HA to MC ratios and examine the temperature dependent gelation properties above their low critical solution temperature (LCST). The viscosity and degree of crystallinity of the resulting HAMC semi‐gels were also assessed. Semi‐gel erosion and mitochondrial release over time were studied using a fluorescence microplate reader. Lastly, seahorse assay was used to study released mitochondria respiration and viability after incubation in HAMC semi‐gel.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
|
Phytopathology
4503 citations, 2.38%
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
4081 citations, 2.16%
|
|
Plant Disease
3335 citations, 1.76%
|
|
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
2964 citations, 1.57%
|
|
PLoS ONE
2521 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
2410 citations, 1.27%
|
|
European Journal of Plant Pathology
2342 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Molecular Plant Pathology
2152 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Plant Pathology
2073 citations, 1.1%
|
|
New Phytologist
1976 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Annual Review of Phytopathology
1827 citations, 0.97%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1624 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Journal of Phytopathology
1557 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Scientific Reports
1504 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology
1453 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Plants
1365 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Crop Protection
1172 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
1000 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Virology
961 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Plant and Soil
926 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Biological Control
919 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Plant Journal
898 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Theoretical And Applied Genetics
888 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Plant Physiology
885 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Archives of Virology
842 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Viruses
834 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Agronomy
772 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Botany
762 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology
755 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
695 citations, 0.37%
|
|
BMC Genomics
654 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Fungi
651 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Mycological Research
638 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Virus Research
614 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Virology
600 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Microorganisms
596 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Fungal Genetics and Biology
584 citations, 0.31%
|
|
BMC Plant Biology
582 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection
573 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Euphytica
570 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Mycologia
555 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
553 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology
550 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Annals of Applied Biology
530 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Pest Management Science
523 citations, 0.28%
|
|
PLoS Pathogens
521 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Applied Soil Ecology
520 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Plant Science
501 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
489 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Fungal Biology
481 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Forest Pathology
466 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Planta
433 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Environmental Microbiology
403 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Postharvest Biology and Technology
399 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of General Virology
393 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Advances in Virus Research
390 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
386 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Plant, Cell and Environment
383 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Physiological Plant Pathology
360 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Scientia Horticulturae
345 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Plant Cell
332 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Plant Pathology Journal
332 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Microbiological Research
318 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Australasian Plant Pathology
314 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Forest Ecology and Management
308 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Transactions of the British Mycological Society
300 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Plant Molecular Biology
295 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Crop Science
294 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of General Plant Pathology
291 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Current Opinion in Plant Biology
289 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Plant Physiology
285 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Phytochemistry
279 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Molecular Ecology
278 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Forests
262 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Biocontrol Science and Technology
256 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Journal of Potato Research
251 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Phytoparasitica
249 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Plant Signaling and Behavior
244 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Tropical Plant Pathology
241 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Virological Methods
241 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
240 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nature Communications
237 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
236 citations, 0.12%
|
|
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
235 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Phytobiomes Journal
233 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Applied Microbiology
230 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Plant Biotechnology Journal
229 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
228 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Microbiology
227 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Trends in Plant Science
223 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Botany
223 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Virus Genes
216 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Molecular Breeding
214 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Molecular Plant
209 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Microbial Ecology
209 citations, 0.11%
|
|
FEMS Microbiology Letters
207 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
204 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Molecular Microbiology
203 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
199 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Toxins
196 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
|
|
Elsevier
35877 citations, 18.98%
|
|
Springer Nature
35018 citations, 18.52%
|
|
Wiley
24291 citations, 12.85%
|
|
Scientific Societies
11923 citations, 6.31%
|
|
MDPI
11056 citations, 5.85%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
7731 citations, 4.09%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
7200 citations, 3.81%
|
|
Oxford University Press
5538 citations, 2.93%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3800 citations, 2.01%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
3704 citations, 1.96%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
3651 citations, 1.93%
|
|
Annual Reviews
2816 citations, 1.49%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1494 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1336 citations, 0.71%
|
|
SciELO
1030 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1012 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Microbiology Society
878 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
837 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Korean Society of Plant Pathology
677 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Crop Science Society of America
497 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
485 citations, 0.26%
|
|
The Royal Society
455 citations, 0.24%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
344 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
343 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
332 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
331 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IntechOpen
313 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
302 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Plant Management Network
291 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
284 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
270 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
253 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
248 citations, 0.13%
|
|
PeerJ
241 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IOP Publishing
234 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Science Alert
210 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
195 citations, 0.1%
|
|
SAGE
169 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
168 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Brill
165 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
152 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
147 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Academic Journals
143 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Association for Food Protection
134 citations, 0.07%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
131 citations, 0.07%
|
|
126 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
120 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
105 citations, 0.06%
|
|
King Saud University
103 citations, 0.05%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
98 citations, 0.05%
|
|
EDP Sciences
93 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
93 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
92 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society of Nematologists
91 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Gabonatermesztesi Kutato Kozhasznu Tarsasag/Cereal Research Non-Profit Company
86 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Portland Press
81 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Mycology
76 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Asian Network for Scientific Information
75 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Wageningen Academic Publishers
72 citations, 0.04%
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
70 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
69 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Polish Academy of Sciences Chancellery
69 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Han-Gug Misaengmul Hag-hoe/The Microbiological Society of Korea
61 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Copernicus
60 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
59 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Mycological Association
59 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IGI Global
57 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Society of Breeding
56 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Society Of Microbial Ecology
55 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Mycological Society of Japan
53 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Phytopathological Society of Japan
52 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Genetica
51 citations, 0.03%
|
|
49 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute
45 citations, 0.02%
|
|
China National Rice Research Institute
45 citations, 0.02%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
44 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japanese Society for Plant Cell and Molecular Biology
44 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
44 citations, 0.02%
|
|
41 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japanese Society for Horticultural Science
40 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
38 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Peanut Research & Education Society
38 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Florida Entomologist Society
36 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
36 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
35 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Crop Sciences (ICS)
35 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AIP Publishing
34 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Zhejiang University Press
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pesticide Science Society of Japan
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics (NAS Ukraine)
30 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences
29 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
28 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Instituto de Tecnologia do Parana
28 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
27 citations, 0.01%
|
|
BioOne
27 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Soil Science Society of America
26 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
25 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of California Press
23 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
University of California, Davis
42 publications, 3.02%
|
|
Cornell University
39 publications, 2.81%
|
|
University of Florida
30 publications, 2.16%
|
|
Oregon State University
28 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
27 publications, 1.94%
|
|
North Carolina State University
24 publications, 1.73%
|
|
Washington State University
20 publications, 1.44%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
19 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Michigan State University
18 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Texas A&M University
18 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Iowa State University
17 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
17 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
16 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Kansas State University
16 publications, 1.15%
|
|
John Innes Centre
13 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Ohio State University
12 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Minnesota
12 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Purdue University
12 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Israel Agricultural Research Organization
11 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Rothamsted Research
11 publications, 0.79%
|
|
ETH Zurich
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Kentucky
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Cambridge
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Colorado State University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Utrecht University
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Tennessee
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Toronto
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Exeter
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
AgroParisTech
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Zhejiang University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Ghent University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Sydney
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Northwest University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Northwest A&F University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Virginia Tech
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Helsinki
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Imperial College London
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Dundee
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Plant and Food Research
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Queensland
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Pretoria
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Arizona
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Australian National University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Turin
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Warwick
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Aarhus University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Western Australia
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Curtin University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Stanford University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Clemson University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of British Columbia
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Universidade Estadual Paulista
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Weizmann Institute of Science
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Zurich
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
China Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Milan
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
North Dakota State University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Agricultural Research Council
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Auburn University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Newcastle University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
International Rice Research Institute
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Agricultural University of Athens
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Crete
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
|
University of Florida
9 publications, 10.11%
|
|
University of California, Davis
7 publications, 7.87%
|
|
Oregon State University
6 publications, 6.74%
|
|
Michigan State University
5 publications, 5.62%
|
|
Cornell University
5 publications, 5.62%
|
|
Iowa State University
5 publications, 5.62%
|
|
Washington State University
4 publications, 4.49%
|
|
University of Tennessee
4 publications, 4.49%
|
|
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection
3 publications, 3.37%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
3 publications, 3.37%
|
|
Purdue University
3 publications, 3.37%
|
|
Zhejiang University
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Israel Agricultural Research Organization
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
University of Dundee
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
University of Cambridge
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Auburn University
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Colorado State University
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Newcastle University
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Utrecht University
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
2 publications, 2.25%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Tübingen
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Lorraine
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Jordan
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Southwest University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
China Agricultural University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Imperial College London
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Shanghai Normal University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Southern University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Sichuan Agricultural University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Northwest University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Marche Polytechnic University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
North Dakota State University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Institute of Sciences of Food Production
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Agricultural Research Council
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Pretoria
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
North Carolina State University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Northwest A&F University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Clemson University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Ohio State University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Austral University of Chile
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Institut Pasteur
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Tulane University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Minnesota
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Leeds
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Kansas State University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Okayama University
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of East Anglia
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Toronto
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Valencia
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Exeter
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Guelph
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Kentucky
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Spanish National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Girona
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
University of Lleida
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
United States National Library of Medicine
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
National Center for Biotechnology Information
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Université Côte d'Azur
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 1.12%
|
|
Show all (68 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
USA
|
USA, 417, 30.02%
USA
417 publications, 30.02%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 91, 6.55%
United Kingdom
91 publications, 6.55%
|
France
|
France, 48, 3.46%
France
48 publications, 3.46%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 48, 3.46%
Netherlands
48 publications, 3.46%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 36, 2.59%
Germany
36 publications, 2.59%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 32, 2.3%
Australia
32 publications, 2.3%
|
China
|
China, 29, 2.09%
China
29 publications, 2.09%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 26, 1.87%
Canada
26 publications, 1.87%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 24, 1.73%
Spain
24 publications, 1.73%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 23, 1.66%
Italy
23 publications, 1.66%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 19, 1.37%
Israel
19 publications, 1.37%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 18, 1.3%
Switzerland
18 publications, 1.3%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 11, 0.79%
Belgium
11 publications, 0.79%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 10, 0.72%
Brazil
10 publications, 0.72%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 10, 0.72%
New Zealand
10 publications, 0.72%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 9, 0.65%
Mexico
9 publications, 0.65%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 9, 0.65%
Japan
9 publications, 0.65%
|
India
|
India, 6, 0.43%
India
6 publications, 0.43%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 6, 0.43%
Finland
6 publications, 0.43%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 6, 0.43%
Sweden
6 publications, 0.43%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 6, 0.43%
South Africa
6 publications, 0.43%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 0.36%
Austria
5 publications, 0.36%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 4, 0.29%
Denmark
4 publications, 0.29%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0.29%
Colombia
4 publications, 0.29%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.22%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.22%
Greece
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 3, 0.22%
Kenya
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 0.22%
Norway
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.14%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.14%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 2, 0.14%
Syria
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.14%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.14%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.14%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.07%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.07%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.07%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.07%
Iran
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.07%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.07%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.07%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.07%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.07%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.07%
Panama
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.07%
Poland
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.07%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.07%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.07%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.07%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.07%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.07%
Chile
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.07%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Show all (22 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
USA
|
USA, 54, 60.67%
USA
54 publications, 60.67%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 16, 17.98%
United Kingdom
16 publications, 17.98%
|
France
|
France, 9, 10.11%
France
9 publications, 10.11%
|
China
|
China, 9, 10.11%
China
9 publications, 10.11%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 7, 7.87%
Germany
7 publications, 7.87%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 6, 6.74%
Australia
6 publications, 6.74%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 6.74%
Spain
6 publications, 6.74%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 5.62%
Italy
5 publications, 5.62%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 5.62%
Netherlands
5 publications, 5.62%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 4.49%
Canada
4 publications, 4.49%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 3.37%
Argentina
3 publications, 3.37%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 2.25%
Belgium
2 publications, 2.25%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 2.25%
Brazil
2 publications, 2.25%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 2.25%
Israel
2 publications, 2.25%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 2.25%
Norway
2 publications, 2.25%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 2.25%
Switzerland
2 publications, 2.25%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 1.12%
Austria
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 1.12%
Hungary
1 publication, 1.12%
|
India
|
India, 1, 1.12%
India
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 1.12%
Jordan
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 1.12%
Colombia
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 1.12%
Mexico
1 publication, 1.12%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 1.12%
New Zealand
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 1.12%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 1.12%
Finland
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 1.12%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 1.12%
Chile
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 1.12%
Sweden
1 publication, 1.12%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 1.12%
South Africa
1 publication, 1.12%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 1.12%
Japan
1 publication, 1.12%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
1 profile journal article
Hassani Mohamed Amine
19 publications,
1 301 citations
h-index: 9