Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2
SJR
0.859
CiteScore
2.8
Categories
Political Science and International Relations
Public Administration
Sociology and Political Science
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2014-2025
journal names
Research and Politics
RES POLITICS
Top-3 citing journals

SSRN Electronic Journal
(234 citations)

Research and Politics
(121 citations)

Political Behavior
(106 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Pennsylvania State University
(14 publications)

Stanford University
(12 publications)

Uppsala University
(10 publications)

Dartmouth College
(6 publications)

Pennsylvania State University
(6 publications)

Uppsala University
(6 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 464
Q3

A Novel Scale to Measure Nursing Students’ Fear of Artificial Intelligence: Development and Validation
Albikawi Z., Abuadas M.
Background
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare is revolutionizing patient care and clinical practice, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility. However, it has also sparked concerns among nursing students about job displacement, reliance on technology, and the potential loss of human qualities like empathy and compassion, to this date, there is no established scale measuring the level of fear, especially among nursing students.
Aim
To develop and validate a scale to assess nursing students' fear of artificial intelligence.
Methods
The current study employed a cross-sectional design, involving a total of 225 Saudi nursing students enrolled in a nursing college. The scale's construct, convergent, and discriminant validity were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
Results
A comprehensive review of the literature addressing fear of AI guided the development of the Fear Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (FtAIS). An initial pool of items was subjected to a content validity assessment by an expert panel, which refined the scale to 10 items categorized into two dimensions: job issues and humanity. The two-factor structure was responsible for 73.52% of the total variance. The scale items' reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, yielding a value of 0.803. The reliability coefficients for the two subscales, job issues, and humanity, are 0.804 and 0.801, respectively. The confirmatory factor model demonstrated a good model fit. The scale's convergent and discriminant validity were both confirmed.
Conclusion
The FtAIS is a rigorously developed and validated tool for measuring nursing students' fears toward AI. These findings emphasize the need for targeted educational interventions and training programs that could mitigate AI-related fears and prepare nursing students for its integration into healthcare. The scale offers practical applications for educators and policymakers in addressing AI fear and fostering its confident adoption to enhance patient care and healthcare outcomes.
Q3

Educational Content Focusing on Basic Skills for Novice Nurses to Work Independently in Intensive Care Units in Japan: A Qualitative Study
Imamura S., Tsujimoto T., Fujii M., Takeshita Y., Nagayasu M., Inoue T.
Introduction/Objectives
In Japan, novice nurses are assigned to intensive care units immediately after graduation and are expected to become independent within about a year. Therefore, in addition to long-term, comprehensive educational programs, establishing an educational system that allows novice nurses to learn intensive care unit nursing while working is necessary. This study explored senior nurses’ expectations for novice nurses working independently in the intensive care unit after one year and identified the foundational skills needed for novice nurses to achieve this independence.
Methods
The research collaborators were eight senior nurses working in the intensive care unit of an acute care hospital. They were recruited from four facilities and had five or more years of clinical experience. The study used semi-structured interviews to generate data about the reports, contacts, and consultations they would expect from novice nurses to determine their readiness to become independent.
Results
This study clarified the circumstances under which novice nurses with no practical experience should voluntarily seek support to work as independent nurses one year after being assigned to an intensive care unit. It reflects the characteristics of patients who require intensive management, such as “assistance with central line insertion and removal” and “evaluation of vital signs,” as well as other advanced procedures.
Conclusion
This study clarified the basic skills required for novice nurses and identified the areas in which they should seek support. In the future, this method may be utilized in the early stages of novice nurse education.
Q3

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Resilience Training among Nursing Professionals in Saudi Arabia
Alanazi H.Q., Alreshidi N.M., Alrimali A.M., Alshammari W.D., Elsharif N.E., Teodosio M.T., Gonzales K.A., Gaspar F.B., Tabungar D.M., Alshammri M.A.
Introduction
Nursing is a demanding profession that calls for resilience and stress management. Nevertheless, many nurses do not receive adequate training in these areas. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of resilience training programs on work-related stress and resilience levels among nurses in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
A quasi-experiment intervention study employing pre- and post-test approaches was conducted from January to March, 2024, to assess a resilience training program for nurses in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Fifty nurses from sixteen hospitals were divided into two groups in the stratified random sample: the intervention group (n = 25) and the control group (n = 25). Data was collected using an online survey at baseline and three months post-training, with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and the Expanded Nursing Stress Scale employed for measuring outcomes. The paired samples t-tests for statistical analysis were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0.
Results
Significant improvements were noted in the intervention group, with resilience sores improving to 79.50 from 77.12 (p = 0.015) and stress levels decreasing to 63.54 from 65.08 (p = 0.020). No significant changes were noted in the control group.
Conclusion
Findings indicate that resilience training programs can significantly enhance resilience levels and reduce work-related stress. These results underscore the importance of implementing structured resilience training to better equip nurses for the challenges of their demanding profession.
Q3

Diagnostic Accuracy Comparison between Automatic and Conventional Blood Pressure Measuring Devices in Adults with Hypertension
Curi-Curi P.J., Santiago-González N., Valencia-Ledezma O.E., García-Rascon R., Hernandez-Roque E., Oliver-Flores E.Y., Curiel-Ramirez G.
Background
Blood pressure measurement is a main clinical procedure used for the detection of Systemic Arterial Hypertension. Mercury sphygmomanometer, in combination with auscultation technique, is still recognized as the gold standard for non-invasive blood pressure measurement.
Objective
The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy between automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices versus mercury sphygmomanometers in hospitalized patients.
Methods
A prospective, analytical and cross-sectional diagnostic method study was designed to compare the concordance, positive and negative predictive value, the sensitivity and specificity of automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices and the mercury sphygmomanometer. The devices were divided into two groups: the reference standard which was mercury sphygmomanometer (n=150), versus the index tests, that were wrist device (n=150), semi-automatic sphygmomanometer (n=150) and vital signs monitor (n=150).
Results
The monitor detected more cases (69%) of systemic arterial hypertension (p 0.0019, OR 5.3). The semiautomatic sphygmomanometer identified more true positives (n=22) and true negatives (n=113). It also showed a higher diagnostic accuracy: 67% sensitivity (p 0.0576, OR 0.5) and 97% specificity (p 0.088, OR 3.2). A mean arterial pressure variation <5mmHg of 65% was found with the semiautomatic sphygmomanometer (p <0.0001, OR 0.02) and 61% with the vital signs monitor (p <0.0001, OR 0.12). Best concordance of blood pressure between reference standard versus index test was obtained in the following order: Semi-automatic sphygmomanometer, Vital signs monitor, and Wrist device.
Conclusion
The use of vital signs monitor to measure blood pressure is recommended in all patients, although semiautomatic sphygmomanometer is more sensitive for the detection of systemic arterial hypertension.
Q3

Transforming Nursing Practice to Optimize Care of Patients with Tuberculosis and Associated Comorbidities in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania
Shayo P.M., Zewdie E.A., Byashalira K.C., Chamba N.G., Mbelele P.M., Bygbjerg I.C., Lillebaek T., Christensen D.L., Heysell S.K., Mpagama S.G.
Background
Managing tuberculosis (TB) patients with comorbidities requires a holistic and patient-centered approach. This study evaluated patient-centered care (PCC) experiences among TB patients with multimorbidity under the Adaptive Diseases Control Expert Program in Tanzania (ADEPT), with a focus on the TB/diabetes mellitus (DM) co-epidemic targeted by the program.
Methods
A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted involving TB patients with associated comorbidities receiving care from nurses trained in PCC through the ADEPT program. Patients were assessed for their interpretation of how they received PCC across eight dimensions of care.
Results
All 39 participants with TB had at least one comorbidity (100%). The most common multi-morbidities were TB/HIV (59.0%) and TB/DM (12.8%). Evaluation of needs, values, and preferences revealed that participants strongly felt healthcare workers considered these aspects (mean score = 4.53; scale 1 minimum- strongly disagree to 5 maximum- strongly agree). Subsequent analysis showed varying evaluations across dimensions. Patients reported robust endorsement for receiving care that involved family and friends, with mean scores of 4.04, and for access to care, with a mean score of 4.40. However, physical comfort, coordination, continuity of care, education and emotional support received comparatively lower rankings.
Conclusion
TB patients with multimorbidity under the ADEPT program experienced PCC. However, certain systemic issues such as physical spaces, coordination, transition of care, and information education did not meet patient’s needs in their own assessment, indicating opportunities for further quality improvement. Scaling up the ADEPT program within healthcare systems is likely to enhance care provision for TB patients with multimorbidity through a patient-centered approach.
Q3

Psychiatric Care Setting from the Perspective of Psychiatric Nursing Managers
Vieira L.C., Bocchi S.C., MacPhee M., Spiri W.C.
Background
Nursing managers are well-positioned to enhance holistic care for patients in psychiatric settings. Managers need to use evidence-based data available to them when making nurse staffing decisions. Patient classification systems can be an excellent source of patients’ priority care needs.
Objective
To understand the meaning of using patient classification systems as a management tool for psychiatric nursing managers.
Methods
Qualitative study with a content analysis methodological framework. Ten nursing managers from psychiatric institutions in the state of São Paulo participated. Data were collected between August 2016 and May 2017 using a semi-structured interview with recorded audio.
Results
The sample consisted of nine women and one man with an average of 14 years’ experience in mental health and seven years of management experience. The psychiatric care setting emerged as a general theme surrounded by four subthemes: current model of decision making, ideal model of decision making, nursing staff dimensioning/staffing, and professional and mental health legislation. Only half of the managers used a patient classification system as a management tool, and there were difficulties associated with their use of the tool.
Conclusion
A conceptual model was developed based on the themes, subthemes, categories, and sub-categories in this study. The model demonstrates major differences between psychiatric settings with biomedical models versus psychosocial models. Managers with knowledge of PCS data can better advocate for patients’ holistic needs and adequate nursing resource allocation. Managers may lack the knowledge and skills required for model transformation, and continuing management/leadership education is recommended.
Q3

The Development of a Cultural-based Questionnaire for Drug Use Prevention Programs for Adolescents: A Delphi Study
Tahlil T., Hadi N., Maulina, Marlina
Objective
This study aimed to identify a valid and cultural-based questionnaire for drug use prevention programs for adolescents.
Methods
The study used a three-round Delphi technique. A total of 21 participants with knowledge and experiences in community nursing (11 nurses) and education for junior high school students (11 teachers) in Aceh Province, Indonesia, were included. For the first round, focus group discussions were conducted. For the second round, participants were asked to indicate their levels of agreement and provide their comments on the proposed questionnaire. For the third round, participants were instructed to indicate their level of agreement with the final version of the developed questionnaire. The consensus was defined based on the percent agreement.
Results
Initially, 64 questions for four domains (knowledge = 14 items, attitude = 29 items, intention = 9 items, behaviors = 12 items) were developed based on the FGDs and literature review. Finally, the four domains and 43 questions (knowledge = 14 items, attitude = 12 items, intention = 9 items, behaviours = 8 items) were supported by the group panels as the final instrument for the evaluation of drug use prevention programs for adolescents in schools.
Conclusion
Expert panels validated the content of the questionnaire for the drug use prevention programs in Indonesia. Nonetheless, further analysis and implementation of the instrument are required to identify the accuracy of the instrument.
Q3

Understanding the Relationship Between Care Quality Perception and Patient Safety Culture
Janghorban A., Moghri J., Ghavami V., Raesi R., Tabatabaee S.S.
Background
Assessing the perceived quality of care and safety culture by nurses is an important part of nursing practice and is vital for improving the quality of nursing care.
Aim
This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted using stratified and convenience sampling techniques from March 2023 to January 2024 among 412 nurses working in hospitals at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The data collection tools were standard care behavior questionnaires (CBI-42) and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical tests at a significance level of 0.05.
Results
The perceived quality of care among nurses was high, with a score of 4.79 (1-6). The highest score was in “knowledge and professional skill” (5.03), while “communication and positive attitude” scored the lowest (4.59). Patient safety culture averaged 3.35 (1-5), with “overall perception of patient safety” at 4.82 and “non-punitive response to error” at 2.40. A significant direct relationship was found between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture (r=0.226, p<0.001), indicating that improvements in one may enhance the other.
Conclusion
Due to the existence of a direct relationship between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture, appropriate training and using the experiences of others, improving the relationship between nurses and patients, creating a sense of security in nurses, and solving the problems of nurses can enhance the quality of health care services.
Q3

Adherence to Radiation Protection Principles in the Clinical Environment among Anesthesia and Operating Room Nursing Students: Implications for Educational Interventions
Ghasemi S., Khosravi H., Imani B., Shabani N.
Background
The increasing use of ionizing radiation in clinical environments, particularly during surgeries such as orthopedics and neurosurgery, has heightened concerns about the potential health risks associated with this type of radiation. This issue is particularly relevant for nursing students undergoing training in operating room settings, where they are frequently exposed to various sources of radiation. To effectively implement radiation protection principles, it is crucial to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of the students toward ionizing radiation. Understanding their level of awareness and beliefs about radiation safety will inform the development of targeted training programs aimed at minimizing exposure and enhancing safety in clinical environments.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and performance of 8th-semester undergraduate anesthesia and operating room nursing students toward radiation protection principles.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2024. In this study, students were selected via the census sampling method. The data related to the study were collected from valid questionnaires concerning the participants’ level of knowledge, attitudes, and performance toward ionizing radiation. The data analysis was also conducted at the descriptive and inferential statistics level via SPSS version 16 software.
Results
The knowledge, attitudes, and performance of the students in both fields were inadequate compared to the ideal standards. Additionally, the mean attitude score toward protective principles was significantly greater among operating room nursing students than anesthesia nursing students (p-value = 0.023). Furthermore, a positive and significant correlation was found between students' Grade Point Average (GPA) and their scores on knowledge and attitudes toward protective principles (r = 0.449, p-value = 0.000 and r = 0.648, p-value = 0.000, respectively).
Conclusion
This study revealed that the level of knowledge among students regarding ionizing radiation is lower than the desired standards for ensuring safety in clinical environments. As a result, it is essential to implement targeted training courses to enhance students' understanding of the risks associated with ionizing radiation.
Q3

The Effect of Emotional Intelligence, Caring Efficacy, and Social Support on Clinical Competency of Nursing Students
Park J., Rajaguru V., Kim J.
Aim
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of emotional intelligence, caring efficacy, and social support on the clinical competency of Korean nursing students.
Methods
We conducted a descriptive correlational study from 5th March to 10th June 10, 2020, among 257 nursing students in 3rd and 4th years who participated in clinical practice at four universities in two cities. We collected the data using a self-structured questionnaire that included 129 items from the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), the General Self-efficacy (GSE) scale, and scales on social support and clinical competency. We analyzed the data using frequency analysis, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression analysis.
Results
The majority of the students, i.e., 80.2%, were female, 57.6% were in their 3rd year, and the students’ average age ranged from 22.91 to 4.75. The participants’ clinical competency was linked to their emotional intelligence (r =.457; p<.001), their ability to care for others (r =.516; p<.001), and their social support (r =.515; p^.001). There was a statistically significant difference in clinical competency based on the participants’ religion, academic performance, and satisfaction with their major and clinical practice. Factors, such as care efficacy, social support, emotional intelligence, religion, and significant satisfaction, influenced clinical competency.
Conclusion
Overall, 39.3% of the participants demonstrated clinical competency. The results have highlighted the need for the development of an effective educational program that can enhance emotional intelligence, care efficacy, social support, and major satisfaction, thereby promoting the clinical competency of nursing students.
Q3

Communication Methods Used with Conscious Intubated Patients: Scoping Review
Karmakar M., Panduragan S.L., Said F.M.
Background
Intubated conscious patients often experience communication difficulties. The present narrative review outlines the current evidence on communication methods adopted and the experience of conscious intubated patients in critical care areas.
Objectives
To our knowledge, studies have attempted to examine communication with conscious intubated patients. The present review had two objectives: (1) to identify the methods adopted by nurses and conscious intubated patients to ease the communication difficulties faced due to intubation and (2) to identify the experience of nurses and conscious intubated patients with the adopted communication methods.
Methods
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was followed throughout this review. PubMed and ProQuest databases were searched with the terms “intubated conscious patients,” “communication,” and “nurse”, including original research articles published between January 2019 and May 2024 on conscious patients needing intubation. Dissertations, review papers, non-interventional research, and articles written in languages other than English were excluded. Only eight of the original 2,041 studies, which included 137 intubated patients and for 545 nurses, met the inclusion criteria. The authors used the Mixed Method Appraisal tool (MMAT) and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) to collect data and assess quality.
Results
After the first search of generated 2041 papers, only eight articles—representing various studies—were able to meet the inclusion requirements. The included studies were six (6) quantitative, one (1) qualitative study and one (1) mixed-method study. Four communication intervention types were identified, namely: (1) Communication boards/charts (two studies), which improved communication and increased patient satisfaction. (2) Gestures and facial expressions (four studies) were reported to be frequently initiated for communication by the nurses with the patients. (3) Multiple methods (three studies) used were found to be insufficient to communicate with the patients. (4) Digital technology program, including Communicative Digital Technology Program was found to be effective means of communication in three such studies.
Conclusion
Results imply that communication techniques may be useful in enhancing patient–nursing professional communication with conscious intubated patients. However, in developing countries with fewer resources, a low-cost communication tool addressing both physical and emotional needs may be developed to aid in communication among patients and nurses.
Q3

A Case Report on Placenta Accreta: Developing a Conceptual Framework
Alzboon G., Kawafha M., Al Maghaireh D., Alhamory S.
Introduction
Placenta accreta is a pathological condition of the placenta associated with multiple maternal and neonatal complications, but its diagnosis and treatment have been sparsely reported from the nursing viewpoint. This report describes a case of placenta accreta from the nursing perspective to develop a conceptual framework of care.
Case Presentation
Our case involved a 37-year-old pregnant woman with four previous caesarean sections and a previous in vitro fertilisation. She was diagnosed with placenta accreta only in the operating theatre during a scheduled caesarean section, and she had not performed thorough antenatal care as in her previous pregnancies despite having significant symptoms, such as severe urinary incontinence. The patient experienced many complications during the caesarean section, including bladder injury, massive haemorrhage, and hysterectomy.
Conclusion
We develop a theoretical framework illustrating the core factors that influence the management of placenta accreta and associated maternal morbidities. This model highlights the distinction between patient characteristics, nurse characteristics, organisational factors, and pregnancy outcomes and shows their relationship to the diagnosis and prevention of placenta accreta. The model has important implications for research and practice, and the case reminds nurses of their recommended interventions to diagnose, manage, and prevent placenta accreta. The quality of care for placenta accreta cases should be promoted through the assessment of patients, nurses, and organisational factors and the application of prevention measures.
Q3

Development of Community Participation Program on Knowledge and Health Prevention Behaviors Related to Hypertension among Hill Tribe Older Adults in Northern Thailand
Panya P., Yaemmisri W., Viriyaratanakul B., Praison P., Gantagad T., Sareeso P., Guntapan N., Nuansaard I.
Background
The Akha hill tribe of older adults in Thailand, a culturally diverse minority, faces health disparities. Due to limited access to health information and services, those who are unable to read Thai are at a higher risk of developing hypertension. Consequently, hill tribe communities need community engagement to enhance healthcare access and communication between health workers and the community.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the effect of a community participation program on hypertension knowledge and health prevention behaviors among Akha older adults in Thailand.
Methods
This program was developed based on evidence and insights from community scholars and stakeholders. The program included three activities: 1] training the volunteers, 2] home visits by trained adolescent and adult volunteers, and 3] providing hypertension knowledge through village broadcasts. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted using an Akha-specific hypertension knowledge and prevention behaviors questionnaire.
Results
Among the thirty healthy Akha older adults who could not communicate in Thai, following the implementation of the community participation program, there was a significant increase in hypertension knowledge (P = 0.000) and HT prevention behaviors (P = 0.017).
Conclusion
The community participation program could improve hypertension knowledge and hypertension prevention behaviors of older adults in the Akha hill tribe by bridging the gap between the healthcare system and the community.
Q3

Role of the Nursing Professional in Euthanasia: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Avila M.I., Díaz Chavarro B.C., Campo A.P., Vargas Murillo S.M.
Background
Until the date of the search, Euthanasia was legally accepted in 5 countries: the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Canada and Colombia.
Objective
We aimed to identify the role of nurses in euthanasia based on articles published both nationally and internationally between 2014 and 2022.
Methods
Qualitative and quantitative studies, editorials, literature reviews and Colombian regulations were included. Publications that did not meet the criteria of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement and the Spanish Critical Appraisal Skills Programme were excluded. In total, 57 articles were evaluated and 19 were selected. Appropriate copyright principles were followed in accordance with Colombian Law 23 of 1982.
Results
With the data obtained, 4 thematic categories were developed as follows: reception and management of euthanasia requests and regulations in Colombia; emotional accompaniment and effective communication with the patient and family; participation in euthanasia preparations and administration of medications; and management of requests and administration of medications.
Conclusion
Nursing plays an important role in the care of the patient requesting euthanasia, from the reception and management of the request to the administration of the lethal drugs.
Q3

Perceived Health Risks Associated with Smartphone Use Among Health College Students at Qassim University in Saudi Arabia
Qalawa S.A., Ibrahim N.M., Fadlalmola H.A., Elmansy F.M., Elbqry M.G.
Background
Smartphones have evolved into a fusion of traditional personal digital assistants and cellular phones, integrating mobile communication capabilities with features parallel to those of a handheld computer.
Objective
This study aimed to assess the health risks associated with smartphone use and the prevalence and nature of observed health issues among health college students at Qassim University in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
Employing a descriptive cross-sectional research design, this study surveyed a convenience sample of 511 health college students at Qassim University. The data collection instrument comprised two sections: Section 1 assessed sociodemographic, academic, and health-related information, while Section 2 evaluated the health risks as perceived by students.
Results
The majority of the participants were women (71%) and were studying nursing (26%). A significant proportion (39.9%) reported blurred vision, while 38.6% indicated a lack of adequate sleep. Notably, no significant association was observed between the health complaints and sociodemographic information. The analysis also revealed no significant relationship between health complaints and smartphone usage patterns.
Conclusion
The findings highlight a critical need for further research to investigate the factors contributing to the effect of smartphone use on the physiological well-being of university students. Such research is essential for developing targeted interventions to mitigate the associated health risks.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
234 citations, 2.88%
|
|
Research and Politics
121 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Political Behavior
106 citations, 1.31%
|
|
PLoS ONE
101 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Political Research Quarterly
82 citations, 1.01%
|
|
International Studies Quarterly
77 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Comparative Political Studies
75 citations, 0.92%
|
|
British Journal of Political Science
75 citations, 0.92%
|
|
American Political Science Review
74 citations, 0.91%
|
|
American Politics Research
72 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Journal of Politics
72 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Social Science Quarterly
69 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Journal of Conflict Resolution
66 citations, 0.81%
|
|
European Journal of Political Research
62 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Journal of Peace Research
57 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Political Science Research and Methods
57 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Political Psychology
56 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Public Opinion Quarterly
56 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Electoral Studies
55 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Party Politics
52 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Journal of European Public Policy
48 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Politics Groups and Identities
46 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Political Science
45 citations, 0.55%
|
|
West European Politics
43 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Perspectives on Politics
39 citations, 0.48%
|
|
American Journal of Political Science
37 citations, 0.46%
|
|
New Media and Society
37 citations, 0.46%
|
|
International Interactions
36 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Political Communication
35 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Political Studies
33 citations, 0.41%
|
|
European Union Politics
32 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
32 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
31 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Democratization
30 citations, 0.37%
|
|
European Political Science Review
28 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Conflict Management and Peace Science
27 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Government and Opposition
25 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Political Science
25 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Acta Politica
24 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Social Media and Society
24 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Political Analysis
24 citations, 0.3%
|
|
South European Society and Politics
23 citations, 0.28%
|
|
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
23 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Political Research Exchange
23 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
22 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Annual Review of Political Science
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Scientific Reports
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Sustainability
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Legislative Studies Quarterly
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Politics & Gender
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Press/Politics
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Common Market Studies
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Digital Journalism
19 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Social Science Computer Review
19 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
PS - Political Science and Politics
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Political Geography
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Global Security Studies
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Policy Studies Journal
17 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Information Technology and Politics
17 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Psychology
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Review of International Organizations
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Political Science Review
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Social Science Journal
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Personality and Individual Differences
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Foreign Policy Analysis
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
World Development
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Organization
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Communication
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Politics and Policy
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journalism Studies
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Current Psychology
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Parliamentary Affairs
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
British Journal of Politics and International Relations
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Nature Human Behaviour
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Vaccine
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Latin American Politics and Society
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Politics and Governance
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Public Policy
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Social Sciences
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Behavioral Scientist
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Nations and Nationalism
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
European Politics and Society
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
European Journal of Political Economy
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Information Communication and Society
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
European Journal of Social Psychology
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Comparative European Politics
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Political Studies Review
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journalism Practice
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
SAGE
1301 citations, 16.04%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1200 citations, 14.79%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
896 citations, 11.05%
|
|
Springer Nature
864 citations, 10.65%
|
|
Wiley
788 citations, 9.71%
|
|
Elsevier
627 citations, 7.73%
|
|
Oxford University Press
553 citations, 6.82%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
219 citations, 2.7%
|
|
MDPI
132 citations, 1.63%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
108 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
106 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Emerald
105 citations, 1.29%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
87 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
83 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
55 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
51 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Annual Reviews
43 citations, 0.53%
|
|
JMIR Publications
42 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
37 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
32 citations, 0.39%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
IGI Global
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Bristol University Press
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Cogitatio
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
MIT Press
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SciELO
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Economic Association
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Center for the Study of the Presidency
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institut fur Iberoamerika-Kunde
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
BMJ
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Marketing Association
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Duke University Press
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Royal Society
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
EPI SCP
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Centro de Estudos de Opiniao Publica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Brill
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
OpenEdition
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
CAIRN
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOS Press
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
EDP Sciences
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of California Press
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PeerJ
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society for Sociological Science
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
F1000 Research
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control MMWR Office
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Political Science Association
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Accounting Association
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Johann Ambrosius Barth
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Management
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOP Publishing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of International Relations, Prague
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Copernicus
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademika Forlag
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Public Health Association
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association for the Sociology of Religion
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
MGIMO University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AOSIS
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Guilford Publications
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Moscow State Institute of International Relations
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Brookings Institution Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Instituto de Pesquisas Economicas
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Noncommercial Partnership Editorial Board Polis
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
IWA Publishing
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Polibijaus Fondas
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
World Health Organization
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Bureau for Economic Research
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Editura Economica
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
14 publications, 2.64%
|
|
Stanford University
12 publications, 2.26%
|
|
Uppsala University
10 publications, 1.89%
|
|
Cornell University
10 publications, 1.89%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
10 publications, 1.89%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
10 publications, 1.89%
|
|
Dartmouth College
10 publications, 1.89%
|
|
Texas A&M University
10 publications, 1.89%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
George Washington University
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Princeton University
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
New York University
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
University of Mannheim
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Yale University
8 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Duke University
8 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Houston
8 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Essex
8 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Zurich
7 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Columbia University
7 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
7 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
7 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
7 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Oxford
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Georgetown University
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Harvard University
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Konstanz
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Colorado State University
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Ohio State University
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Leiden University
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Michigan State University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Bocconi University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
European University Institute
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Davis
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Northeastern University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Vienna
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Miami
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Texas Tech University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University College London
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Brunel University London
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
King's College London
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Manchester
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Florida State University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Southern California
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Glasgow
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Iowa State University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
American University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Auburn University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Arizona
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Illinois State University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Dublin City University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
German Institute for Global and Area Studies (Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien)
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Minnesota
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
WZB Berlin Social Science Center
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Purdue University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Tokyo
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Louisville
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Brigham Young University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Alabama
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Wesleyan University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Connecticut
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
New York University Abu Dhabi
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Antwerp
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Southampton
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Clemson University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
George Mason University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Oregon State University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Syracuse University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Washington
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
Uppsala University
6 publications, 2.4%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
6 publications, 2.4%
|
|
Dartmouth College
6 publications, 2.4%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
6 publications, 2.4%
|
|
Duke University
5 publications, 2%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
5 publications, 2%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
5 publications, 2%
|
|
University of Mannheim
5 publications, 2%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
4 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Yale University
4 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Stanford University
4 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Princeton University
4 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Colorado State University
4 publications, 1.6%
|
|
New York University
4 publications, 1.6%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
4 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Leiden University
4 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Florida State University
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Georgetown University
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
George Washington University
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Ohio State University
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Konstanz
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Purdue University
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Brigham Young University
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Alabama
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
New York University Abu Dhabi
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
King's College London
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Southampton
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Clemson University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Northeastern University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
WZB Berlin Social Science Center
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Brown University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Tokyo
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Waseda University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Gakushuin University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Barcelona
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Ottawa
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Delaware
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Wesleyan University
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Houston
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Reichman University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Stockholm School of Economics
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of St. Gallen
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Jinan University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Xiamen University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Durham University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Åbo Akademi University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Bergen
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Maastricht University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Antwerp
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
National Chengchi University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Iowa State University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Bocconi University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
European University Institute
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Boston University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Iceland
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
American University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Seoul National University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Yonsei University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Auburn University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
USA
|
USA, 340, 64.15%
USA
340 publications, 64.15%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 55, 10.38%
United Kingdom
55 publications, 10.38%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 54, 10.19%
Germany
54 publications, 10.19%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 20, 3.77%
Netherlands
20 publications, 3.77%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 17, 3.21%
Sweden
17 publications, 3.21%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 15, 2.83%
Canada
15 publications, 2.83%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 12, 2.26%
Spain
12 publications, 2.26%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 12, 2.26%
Switzerland
12 publications, 2.26%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 10, 1.89%
Italy
10 publications, 1.89%
|
China
|
China, 9, 1.7%
China
9 publications, 1.7%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 9, 1.7%
Ireland
9 publications, 1.7%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 8, 1.51%
Belgium
8 publications, 1.51%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 8, 1.51%
Denmark
8 publications, 1.51%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 8, 1.51%
Norway
8 publications, 1.51%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 7, 1.32%
Austria
7 publications, 1.32%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 1.32%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 1.32%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 6, 1.13%
Japan
6 publications, 1.13%
|
France
|
France, 4, 0.75%
France
4 publications, 0.75%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 4, 0.75%
Finland
4 publications, 0.75%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.57%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.57%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.57%
UAE
3 publications, 0.57%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.38%
Russia
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.38%
Israel
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.38%
Chile
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.19%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.19%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.19%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.19%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.19%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.19%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.19%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.19%
Malta
1 publication, 0.19%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.19%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.19%
Romania
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.19%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.19%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Show all (6 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
USA
|
USA, 135, 54%
USA
135 publications, 54%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 28, 11.2%
Germany
28 publications, 11.2%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 22, 8.8%
United Kingdom
22 publications, 8.8%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 14, 5.6%
Netherlands
14 publications, 5.6%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 11, 4.4%
Sweden
11 publications, 4.4%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 8, 3.2%
Canada
8 publications, 3.2%
|
China
|
China, 7, 2.8%
China
7 publications, 2.8%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 6, 2.4%
Belgium
6 publications, 2.4%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 2.4%
Spain
6 publications, 2.4%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 2%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 2%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 4, 1.6%
Denmark
4 publications, 1.6%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 4, 1.6%
Norway
4 publications, 1.6%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 1.6%
Japan
4 publications, 1.6%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 1.2%
Austria
3 publications, 1.2%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 1.2%
Ireland
3 publications, 1.2%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 1.2%
Italy
3 publications, 1.2%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 1.2%
UAE
3 publications, 1.2%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 1.2%
Switzerland
3 publications, 1.2%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.8%
Israel
2 publications, 0.8%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.8%
Finland
2 publications, 0.8%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.8%
Chile
2 publications, 0.8%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.4%
Russia
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.4%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.4%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.4%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.4%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.4%
Malta
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.4%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.4%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.4%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|