Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Years of issue
2024
journal names
Anthropology News
Top-3 citing journals

SSRN Electronic Journal
(301 citations)

American Anthropologist
(130 citations)

Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu
(105 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of California, Los Angeles
(25 publications)

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
(24 publications)

University of California, Berkeley
(19 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 370
Sampling methods for the concentration parameter and discrete baseline of the Dirichlet Process
Liu Y., Nandram B.
Abstract
There are many models in the current statistical literature for making inferences based on samples selected from a finite population. Parametric models may be problematic because statistical inference is sensitive to parametric assumptions. The Dirichlet process (DP) prior is very flexible and determines the complexity of the model. It is indexed by two hyper-parameters: the baseline distribution and concentration parameter. We address two distinct problems in the article. Firstly, we review the current sampling methods for the concentration parameter, which use the continuous baseline distribution. We compare three different methods: the adaptive rejection method, the mixture of Gammas method and the grid method. We also propose a new method based on the ratio of uniforms. Secondly, in practice, some survey responses are known to be discrete. If a continuous distribution is adopted as the baseline distribution, the model is misspecified and standard inference may be invalid. We propose a discrete baseline approach to the DP prior and sample the unobserved responses from the finite population both using a Polya urn scheme and a Multinomial distribution. We applied our discrete baseline approach to a Phytophthora data set.
Missing data estimation based on the chaining technique in survey sampling
Thakur N.S., Shukla D.
Abstract
Sample surveys are often affected by missing observations and non-response caused by the respondents’ refusal or unwillingness to provide the requested information or due to their memory failure. In order to substitute the missing data, a procedure called imputation is applied, which uses the available data as a tool for the replacement of the missing values. Two auxiliary variables create a chain which is used to substitute the missing part of the sample. The aim of the paper is to present the application of the Chain-type factor estimator as a means of source imputation for the non-response units in an incomplete sample. The proposed strategies were found to be more efficient and bias-controllable than similar estimation procedures described in the relevant literature. These techniques could also be made nearly unbiased in relation to other selected parametric values. The findings are supported by a numerical study involving the use of a dataset, proving that the proposed techniques outperform other similar ones.
Generalised Lindley shared additive frailty regression model for bivariate survival data
Pandey A., Hanagal D.D., Tyagi S.
Abstract
Frailty models are the possible choice to counter the problem of the unobserved heterogeneity in individual risks of disease and death. Based on earlier studies, shared frailty models can be utilised in the analysis of bivariate data related to survival times (e.g. matched pairs experiments, twin or family data). In this article, we assume that frailty acts additively to the hazard rate. A new class of shared frailty models based on generalised Lindley distribution is established. By assuming generalised Weibull and generalised log-logistic baseline distributions, we propose a new class of shared frailty models based on the additive hazard rate. We estimate the parameters in these frailty models and use the Bayesian paradigm of the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique. Model selection criteria have been applied for the comparison of models. We analyse kidney infection data and suggest the best model.
Zero-modified Poisson-Modification of Quasi Lindley distribution and its application
Tharshan R., Wijekoon P.
Abstract
The Poisson-Modification of Quasi Lindley (PMQL) distribution is a newly introduced mixed Poisson distribution for over-dispersed count data. The aim of this article is to introduce the Zero-modified PMQL (ZMPMQL) distribution as an alternative to the PMQL distribution in order to accommodate zero inflation/deflation. The method of obtaining the ZMPMQL distribution jointly with some of its important properties, namely the probability mass and distribution functions, mean, variance, index of dispersion, and quantile function are presented. Furthermore, some of its special cases are discussed. The maximum likelihood (ML) estimation method is used for the unknown parameter estimation. A simulation study is conducted in order to evaluate the asymptotic theory of the ML estimation method and to show the superiority of the ML method over the method of moments estimation. The applicability of the introduced distribution is illustrated by using a real-world data set.
Comparison of confidence intervals for variance components in an unbalanced one-way random effects model
Jiratampradab A., Supapakorn T., Suntornchost J.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to study and compare the methods for constructing confidence intervals for variance components in an unbalanced one-way random effects model. The methods are based on a classical exact, generalised pivotal quantity, a fiducial inference and a fiducial generalised pivotal quantity. The comparison of criteria involves the empirical coverage probability that maintains at the nominal confidence level of 0.95 and the shortest average length of the confidence interval. The simulation results show that the method based on the generalised pivotal quantity and the fiducial inference perform very well in terms of both the empirical coverage probability and the average length of the confidence interval. The classical exact method performs well in some situations, while the fiducial generalised pivotal quantity performs well in a very unbalanced design. Therefore, the method based on the generalised pivotal quantity is recommended for all situations.
Optimal allocation for equal probability two-stage design
Molefe W.
Abstract
This paper develops optimal designs when it is not feasible for every cluster to be represented in a sample as in stratified design, by assuming equal probability two-stage sampling where clusters are small areas. The paper develops allocation methods for two-stage sample surveys where small-area estimates are a priority. We seek efficient allocations where the aim is to minimize the linear combination of the mean squared errors of composite small area estimators and of an estimator of the overall mean. We suggest some alternative allocations with a view to minimizing the same objective. Several alternatives, including the area-only stratified design, are found to perform nearly as well as the optimal allocation but with better practical properties. Designs are evaluated numerically using Switzerland canton data as well as Botswana administrative districts data.
Robustness of randomisation tests as alternative analysis methods for repeated measures design
Oladugba A.V., Obasi A.J., Asogwa O.C.
Abstract
Randomisation tests (R-tests) are regularly proposed as an alternative method of hypothesis testing when assumptions of classical statistical methods are violated in data analysis. In this paper, the robustness in terms of the type-I-error and the power of the R-test were evaluated and compared with that of the F-test in the analysis of a single factor repeated measures design. The study took into account normal and non-normal data (skewed: exponential, lognormal, Chi-squared, and Weibull distributions), the presence and lack of outliers, and a situation in which the sphericity assumption was met or not under varied sample sizes and number of treatments. The Monte Carlo approach was used in the simulation study. The results showed that when the data were normal, the R-test was approximately as sensitive and robust as the F-test, while being more sensitive than the F-test when data had skewed distributions. The R-test was more sensitive and robust than the F-test in the presence of an outlier. When the sphericity assumption was met, both the R-test and the F-test were approximately equally sensitive, whereas the R-test was more sensitive and robust than the F-test when the sphericity assumption was not met.
Changes in the structure of household disposable income in selected countries as a reflection of crises after 2000
Hindls R., Marek L., Hronová S.
Abstract
Wages and salaries represent the most important component of household disposable income. The aim of the article is to examine how the relationship between the shares of households’ wages and final consumption expenditure in their gross disposable income has developed over the past 20 years. The presented analysis uses publicly available national accounts data for 30 countries for the period of 2000–2019. The studied indicators include the proportion of households’ wages and salaries, and final consumption expenditure in their gross disposable income. Using the proposed method based on the evaluation of changes in the spatial map, it is possible to observe any significant changes in these proportion values in the years of financial crisis and recession, as well as in the years of prosperity. The procedure can therefore serve as an indicator of appreciable changes in economic development.
Parameter estimation of exponentiated exponential distribution under selective ranked set sampling
Hassan A.S., Elshaarawy R.S., Nagy H.F.
Abstract
Partial ranked set sampling (PRSS) is a cost-effective sampling method. It is a combination of simple random sample (SRS) and ranked set sampling (RSS) designs. The PRSS method allows flexibility for the experimenter in selecting the sample when it is either difficult to rank the units within each set with full confidence or when experimental units are not available. In this article, we introduce and define the likelihood function of any probability distribution under the PRSS scheme. The performance of the maximum likelihood estimators is examined when the available data are assumed to have an exponentiated exponential (EE) distribution via some selective RSS schemes as well as SRS. The suggested ranked schemes include the PRSS, RSS, neoteric RSS (NRSS), and extreme RSS (ERSS). An intensive simulation study was conducted to compare and explore the behaviour of the proposed estimators. The study demonstrated that the maximum likelihood estimators via PRSS, NRSS, ERSS, and RSS schemes are more efficient than the corresponding estimators under SRS. A real data set is presented for illustrative purposes.
The Weibull lifetime model with randomised failure-free time
Sulewski P., Szymkowiak M.
Abstract
The paper shows that treating failure-free time in the three-parameter Weibull distribution not a constant, but as a random variable makes the resulting distribution much more flexible at the expense of only one additional parameter.
k-th record estimator of the scale parameter of the α-stable distribution
Stachura M., Wodecka B.
Abstract
Various techniques of scale parameter estimation have been proposed in the case of alpha stable distributions. In the paper, the authors present an estimation technique that involves the k-th record theory. Although this theory is over 40 years old, its implementation in the classical extreme value theory – being the other cornerstone of the presented approach – is quite new, and tempting. Several theoretical properties of the introduced scale parameter estimators are presented. With the use of Monte Carlo methods, a comparative analysis is performed between the approach based on k-th records and approaches based on Hill’s and Pickands’ estimators. Additionally, the paper uses a real-life data set to illustrate how to effectively apply the k-th record estimator of the scale parameter. The research indicates several advantages of the k-th record approach over its other counterparts, especially when dealing with incomplete information about the underlying sample.
Supsim: a Python package and a web-based JavaScript tool to address the theoretical complexities in two-predictor suppression situations
Nazifi M., Fadishei H.
Abstract
Two-predictor suppression situations continue to produce uninterpretable conditions in linear regression. In an attempt to address the theoretical complexities related to suppression situations, the current study introduces two different versions of a software called suppression simulator (Supsim): a) the command-line Python package, and b) the web-based JavaScript tool, both of which are able to simulate numerous random two-predictor models (RTMs). RTMs are randomly generated, normally distributed data vectors x1
, x2
, and y simulated in such a way that regressing y on both x1
and x2
results in the occurrence of numerous suppression and non-suppression situations. The web-based Supsim requires no coding skills and additionally, it provides users with 3D scatterplots of the simulated RTMs. This study shows that comparing 3D scatterplots of different suppression and non-suppression situations provides important new insights into the underlying mechanisms of two-predictor suppression situations. An important focus is on the comparison of 3D scatterplots of certain enhancement situations called Hamilton’s extreme example with those of redundancy situations. Such a comparison suggests that the basic mathematical concepts of two-predictor suppression situations need to be reconsidered with regard to the important issue of the statistical control function.
Polish inequality statistics reconsidered: are the poor really that poor?
Szulc A.
Abstract
In the present study income inequality in Poland is evaluated using corrected income data to provide more reliable estimates. According to most empirical studies based on household surveys and considering the European standards, the recent income inequality in Poland is moderate and decreased significantly after reaching its peaks during the first decade of the 21st century. These findings were challenged by Brzeziński et al. (2022), who placed Polish income inequality among the highest in Europe. Such a conclusion was possible when combining the household survey data with information on personal income tax. In the present study the above-mentioned findings are further explored using 2014 and 2015 data and employing additional corrections to the household survey incomes. Incomes of the poorest people are replaced by their predictions made on a large set of well-being correlates, using the hierarchical correlation reconstruction. Applying this method together with the corrections based on Brzeziński’s et al. results reduces the 2014 and 2015 revised Gini indices, still keeping them above the values obtained with the use of the survey data only. It seems that the hierarchical correlation reconstruction offers more accurate proxies to the actual low incomes, while matching tax data provides better proxies to the top incomes.
Two-stage cluster sampling with unequal probability sampling in the first stage and ranked set sampling in the second stage
Ugwu M.C., Madukaife M.S.
Abstract
In this research work we introduce a new sampling design, namely a two-stage cluster sampling, where probability proportional to size with replacement is used in the first stage unit and ranked set sampling in the second in order to address the issue of marked variability in the sizes of population units concerned with first stage sampling. We obtained an unbiased estimator of the population mean and total, as well as the variance of the mean estimator. We calculated the relative efficiency of the new sampling design to the two-stage cluster sampling with simple random sampling in the first stage and ranked set sampling in the second stage. The results demonstrated that the new sampling design is more efficient than the competing design when a significant variation is observed in the first stage units.
Modified exponential time series model with prediction of total COVID-19 cases in Belgium, Czech Republic, Poland and Switzerland
Permpoonsinsup W., Sunthornwat R.
Abstract
The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic affected every country worldwide. In particular, outbreaks in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Poland and Switzerland entered the second wave and was exponentially increasing between July and November, 2020. The aims of the study are: to estimate the compound growth rate, to develop a modified exponential time-series model compared with the hyperbolic time-series model, and to estimate the optimal parameters for the models based on the exponential least-squares, three selected points, partial-sums methods, and the hyperbolic least-squares for the daily COVID-19 cases in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Poland and Switzerland. The speed and spreading power of COVID-19 infections were obtained by using derivative and root-mean-squared methods, respectively. The results show that the exponential least-squares method was the most suitable for the parameter estimation. The compound growth rate of COVID-19 infection was the highest in Switzerland, and the speed and spreading power of COVID-19 infection were the highest in Poland between July and November, 2020.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
301 citations, 5.09%
|
|
American Anthropologist
130 citations, 2.2%
|
|
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu
105 citations, 1.78%
|
|
Current Anthropology
65 citations, 1.1%
|
|
American Ethnologist
64 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association
49 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Annual Review of Anthropology
49 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Medical Anthropology: Cross Cultural Studies in Health and Illness
39 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Anthropology Today
36 citations, 0.61%
|
|
American Antiquity
32 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology
28 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Annals of Anthropological Practice
28 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
28 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Anthropology and Education Quarterly
27 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Visual Anthropology Review
27 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Medical Anthropology Quarterly
25 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity
25 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Japanese Journal of Crop Science
24 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Anthropological Theory
23 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Anthropology News
23 citations, 0.39%
|
|
PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review
21 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Keikinzoku/Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Social Anthropology
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Anthropology of Work Review
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Research in Science Education
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Anthropology and Humanism
18 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment
18 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Advances in Social Sciences
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
16 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Archaeologies
16 citations, 0.27%
|
|
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
16 citations, 0.27%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
16 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Horticultural Research (Japan)
15 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Reviews in Anthropology
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Museum Anthropology
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Advances in Geosciences
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Critique of Anthropology
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Ethos
12 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology
12 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
China Quarterly
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SAE Technical Papers
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Chagyo Kenkyu Hokoku (Tea Research Journal)
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Hans Journal of Agricultural Sciences
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Cultural Property
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Transforming Anthropology
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Sustainability
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Cultural Anthropology
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Geographical Review of Japan
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Botanical Research
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Modern Linguistics
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Advances in Environmental Protection
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
City and Society
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Signs
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Advances in Archaeological Practice
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Progress in Human Geography
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Gender, Place, and Culture
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Historical Archaeology
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Creative Education Studies
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Higher Brain Function Research
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Aggressive Behavior
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Cultural Dynamics
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Latin American Research Review
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Sociology Compass
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
History and Anthropology
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Energy Research and Social Science
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Dialectical Anthropology
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Identities
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Human Organization
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Economic Anthropology
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Anthropologie et Sociétés
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Social Archaeology
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AIJ Journal of Technology and Design
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Research in Economic Anthropology
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Human Nature
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Archaeological Dialogues
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Practica Otologica
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Latin American Perspectives
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Field Archaeology
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Ethnography
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Japan Academy of Midwifery
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University named after V G Shukhov
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Water Resources Research
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The International Journal of Qualitative Methods
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Astrophysical Journal
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Art Therapy
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Applied Catalysis A: General
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Modern African Studies
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Journal of Public Health
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Visual Anthropology
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Signs and Society
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
Wiley
876 citations, 14.82%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
510 citations, 8.63%
|
|
Springer Nature
345 citations, 5.84%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
301 citations, 5.09%
|
|
SAGE
291 citations, 4.92%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
241 citations, 4.08%
|
|
Elsevier
238 citations, 4.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
184 citations, 3.11%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
140 citations, 2.37%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
91 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Duke University Press
66 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Annual Reviews
60 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Emerald
59 citations, 1%
|
|
OpenEdition
34 citations, 0.58%
|
|
MDPI
29 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Architectural Institute of Japan
28 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
26 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Kyushu University
25 citations, 0.42%
|
|
The Japan Society for Technology and Plasticity
25 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Oxford University Press
24 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Crop Science Society of Japan
24 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
23 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Japan Institute of Light Metals
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Society of Japan Science Teaching
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Japan Society on Water Environment
18 citations, 0.3%
|
|
AIP Publishing
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
16 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
16 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Japanese Society for Horticultural Science
15 citations, 0.25%
|
|
The Association of Japanese Geographers
15 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Copernicus
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
12 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
CAIRN
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IGI Global
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SAE International
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Japanese Society of Tea Science and Technology
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
EDP Sciences
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Anthropological Association
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Japan Society for Higher Brain Dysfunction
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Indiana University Press
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Berghahn Books
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SLACK
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Iron and Steel Institute of Japan
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Infra-M Academic Publishing House
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Japan Academy of Midwifery
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Japan Surgical Association
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Society of Practical Otolaryngology
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Royal Society
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Public Health Association
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
TAPPI Press
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Weed Science Society of Japan
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Japanese Association of Groundwater Hydrology
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Japanese Society of Environmental Education
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Brill
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
MIT Press
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
West-Japanese Society of Orthopedics & Traumatology
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Japan Landslide Society
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
National Association of Biology Teachers
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japan Society of Hepatology
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Surface Finishing Society of Japan
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japan Society of Colour Material
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japan Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japan Society of Waste Management Experts
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japanese Association of Mycotoxicology
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japan Wood Society
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japanese Society of Sport Education
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of California Press
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Maisonneuve et Larose
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Archaeological Institute of America
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
BMJ
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
25 publications, 0.1%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
24 publications, 0.1%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
19 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Harvard University
19 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Cornell University
15 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Stanford University
15 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Florida State University
13 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of Washington
11 publications, 0.04%
|
|
University of Michigan
11 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
9 publications, 0.04%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
9 publications, 0.04%
|
|
William & Mary
9 publications, 0.04%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
8 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
8 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Duke University
7 publications, 0.03%
|
|
San Francisco State University
7 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Wayne State University
7 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Florida
7 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Binghamton University
7 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Michigan State University
6 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
6 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Northwestern University
6 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of California, Davis
6 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Arizona
6 publications, 0.02%
|
|
McGill University
6 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Brown University
6 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
6 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
6 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Yale University
5 publications, 0.02%
|
|
American University
5 publications, 0.02%
|
|
New York University
5 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Northern Arizona University
5 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
5 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
5 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Chicago
5 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
5 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
5 publications, 0.02%
|
|
George Mason University
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Kentucky
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
City College of New York
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Southern Connecticut State University
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of New Mexico
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Missouri
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Massachusetts Amherst
4 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Zurich
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Iowa State University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Cape Town
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Columbia University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Boston University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Dalhousie University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Arizona State University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Ohio State University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Oakland University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
McMaster University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Bloomsburg University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Louisiana State University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Texas Tech University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Texas A&M University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Central Connecticut State University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Brandeis University
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Virginia
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Brooklyn College
3 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Stony Brook University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Georgetown University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Princeton University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Washington State University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Western Washington University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Oregon State University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Tufts University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Northern Illinois University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of South Florida
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Central Michigan University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Marquette University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of British Columbia
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Purdue University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Emory University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Temple University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Calgary
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Miami
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Old Dominion University
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Tennessee
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Connecticut
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Georgia
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Iowa
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
University of Oklahoma
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Université de Montréal
2 publications, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1262, 5.03%
USA
1262 publications, 5.03%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 28, 0.11%
Canada
28 publications, 0.11%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 22, 0.09%
Mexico
22 publications, 0.09%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 16, 0.06%
United Kingdom
16 publications, 0.06%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 15, 0.06%
Italy
15 publications, 0.06%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 6, 0.02%
South Africa
6 publications, 0.02%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 6, 0.02%
Japan
6 publications, 0.02%
|
France
|
France, 5, 0.02%
France
5 publications, 0.02%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 5, 0.02%
Australia
5 publications, 0.02%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 5, 0.02%
Brazil
5 publications, 0.02%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 0.02%
Sweden
5 publications, 0.02%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 0.02%
Ireland
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 4, 0.02%
Norway
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 0.02%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 4, 0.02%
Slovenia
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.01%
Israel
3 publications, 0.01%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.01%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.01%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 0.01%
Netherlands
3 publications, 0.01%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.01%
Switzerland
3 publications, 0.01%
|
China
|
China, 2, 0.01%
China
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 2, 0.01%
Guatemala
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.01%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.01%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.01%
India
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.01%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 2, 0.01%
Nepal
2 publications, 0.01%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.01%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 2, 0.01%
Papua New Guinea
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 2, 0.01%
Puerto Rico
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.01%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0%
Russia
1 publication, 0%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0%
Estonia
1 publication, 0%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0%
Algeria
1 publication, 0%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0%
Belgium
1 publication, 0%
|
Vanuatu
|
Vanuatu, 1, 0%
Vanuatu
1 publication, 0%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0%
Hungary
1 publication, 0%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0%
Georgia
1 publication, 0%
|
Guam
|
Guam, 1, 0%
Guam
1 publication, 0%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0%
Jordan
1 publication, 0%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0%
Iceland
1 publication, 0%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0%
Kenya
1 publication, 0%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0%
Oman
1 publication, 0%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0%
Panama
1 publication, 0%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0%
Peru
1 publication, 0%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0%
Philippines
1 publication, 0%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0%
|
Show all (21 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|