Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part II Electronics)
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part II Electronics)
Top-3 citing journals

IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
(99 citations)

Journal of Lightwave Technology
(85 citations)

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
(59 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Hokkaido University
(141 publications)

Osaka University
(134 publications)

Tohoku University
(121 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 979
Q2

Defining the Characteristics and Outcomes Associated With the Primary Service Provider Teaming Approach: A Systematic Review
Park K.K., Carta J.J.
The Division for Early Childhood (DEC) recommends the Primary Service Provider (PSP) approach as the best teaming practice, but research on its core components and outcomes in early intervention remains limited. Using the DEC Recommended Practices Evidence Synthesis Group Guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to identify PSP core components and associated outcomes. An electronic database search and supplementary methods identified six correlational studies. The findings highlight six core components: forming a transdisciplinary team, designating a PSP, the use of an individual team member serving as the PSP and point of contact, delivering and coordinating services, adopting family-centered practices, and fostering team collaboration and support. Implementation of PSP practice was related to enhanced family outcomes, including family satisfaction and quality of life, particularly when family-centered practices were employed, but showed no relationship to child outcomes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Q2

Interpreting for Equity? A Case Study of Interpretation Practices in EI/ECSE for Spanish-Speaking Latinx Families
Batz R., Santillán J.
Interpretation practices in Early Intervention and Early Childhood Special Education (EI/ECSE) are critical to delivering services to Spanish-speaking Latinx families raising emergent bilinguals labeled as disabled (EBLADs). This study examines the experiences and perspectives of Spanish-speaking mothers, their interpreters, and their bilingual and monolingual EI/ECSE providers to understand interpreting practices. Using intersectional theoretical frameworks of Disability Studies Critical Race Theory (DisCrit) and Raciolinguistics, we employed a case study approach to examine interpretive practices within the boundaries of an EI/ECSE system. Our study uncovered several barriers to providing effective interpretation practices within EI/ECSE services, such as the institutional failure to prioritize time for preparation, collaboration, and resource allocation to support EI/ECSE providers and interpreters, resulting in fragmented services to racialized families needing interpretation support. Our study also found recommendations to reimagine interpretation services, such as prioritizing prepping time with interpreters and investing in culturally responsive professional development. Our findings highlight the need to reimagine how EI/ECSE interpretation services are operated to fulfill their promise and federal obligation to provide responsive and family-centered interpretation services to families needing interpretation.
Q2

Enhancing Meaningful Parent Engagement: Exploring Roles and Perceptions of Parent Representatives on State Interagency Coordinating Councils
Stryker M.E., Fettig A., Alexander J., Hardy A., Burke M.M.
State Interagency Coordinating Councils (SICCs) play vital roles in decision-making for Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). While parent representatives are required to serve on SICCs, it is unclear how parents participate in the SICC. It is important to understand parent experiences on the SICC given the family-centered nature of early intervention. This study utilized qualitative inquiry to detail the motivations, goals, and expectations of 15 parent participants who served on their state’s SICC and examine the link between their initial expectations and their actual roles. Barriers and facilitators to parent engagement are also presented. Findings reveal diverse motivations and expectations. Most parent representatives reported feeling valued, but some perceived their contributions as obligatory. Active solicitation of parent perspectives and leveraging their unique skills enhanced their sense of impact. The study highlights the importance of actively eliciting and valuing parent perspectives within SICCs and intentionally engaging diverse members of each state to strengthen their impact on early intervention policy and promote positive systems change within the Part C system.
Q2

Providers’ Perspectives About Selecting Materials for Early Intervention Sessions: Five Tensions That Influence Material Use
Williams C.S., Fisher K., Stelter C.
Early intervention (EI) sessions are intended to occur in a child’s natural environment. Part of a child’s natural environment includes the materials they typically can access. Recommended practices in the field suggest that EI providers should use materials in children’s homes rather than bringing a toy bag to address the child and family goals. However, the use of the toy bag is still prevalent in the field. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the perspectives of EI special instructors related to how they select materials for their EI sessions. Findings include five themes that represent tensions that EI providers experienced when selecting materials for EI sessions: (a) the journey of bagless intervention, (b) family-centered versus judgment-based views, (c) the natural environment versus the “ideal” environment, (d) professional responsibilities, and (e) addressing children’s needs. Implications include the need for high-quality preservice preparation and professional development related to this recommended practice and continued research related to bagless intervention.
Q2

Empowering Families of Deaf Children: A Qualitative Study on Parental Experiences in Early Intervention
Hopkins K., Puhlman J.
Ensuring the earliest possible start in early intervention for deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children is crucial, given the uncertainties families face upon learning of their child’s diagnosis. The multitude of decisions to foster the child’s linguistic competency requires substantial support for families navigating this process. This study delves into the parent empowerment aspect within Maine’s coordinated early intervention process, Exploring Language and Communication Opportunities (ELCO). This study aimed to explore parent’s experiences during their participation in Maine’s statewide, coordinated, and comprehensive early intervention process for DHH children: ELCO process. Using a phenomenological approach, the researcher explored family experiences through semi-structured interviews. Identified themes across families indicate a sense of empowerment during early visits in intervention, the decision-making process, meeting individuals with lived experiences, and their ability to document their own choices for their child and family. The findings could significantly impact family-centered early intervention practices for DHH children by emphasizing the importance of comprehensive information, support for parents’ decisions, and overall well-being.
Q2

Experiences of Service Coordinators Utilizing the Getting Ready Approach for Home Visits
Kuhn M., Higgins J.
Service coordinators (SCs) in Part C early intervention (EI) programs fulfill critical supportive roles assisting families in accessing and successfully navigating services needed for their infants/toddlers identified with delays or disabilities. However, evidence of effective training for SCs is limited. One state scaled up training in the Getting Ready approach to promoting family–professional partnerships and strengthening home visiting practices of dedicated SCs and their EI provider teammates. In this mixed method study, surveys were completed by 50 trained SCs, their 15 supervisors, and 81 trained EI providers working with the SCs. Forty-one participants were subsequently interviewed in focus groups. Findings indicated SCs’ abilities to fulfill key roles and responsibilities on EI teams were bolstered and family capacity in terms of ownership of their EI services and ability to self-advocate grew. Overall quality of EI services was positively impacted. Implications for SC training are discussed.
Q2

Exploring Advocacy Among Caregivers of Children Receiving Early Intervention Services
Terol A.K., Fulton K., Hardy A., Burke M.
While parents are often expected to advocate for their children with disabilities throughout their lifespans, little is known about the beginning advocacy experiences for parents of young children with disabilities. The purpose of this study was to examine the advocacy experiences of caregivers of children with disabilities during early intervention. Altogether, 24 caregivers of children with disabilities participated in individual interviews about their lived experiences with advocacy in early intervention. Findings revealed that participants often engaged in advocacy during early intervention. Some advocacy strategies were similar to advocacy for school services (e.g., learning one’s rights). In addition, some strategies included using effective communication strategies and being assertive and persistent. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Q2

Examining the Impact of COVID-19 on Early Intervention Service Provision for Military Families: A Brief Report
Zellner M.A., Grauzer J., Kaat A.J., Roberts M.Y.
Understanding the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted birth-to-three early intervention (EI) service provision is critical as these services play an essential role in ensuring positive long-term developmental outcomes for children with disabilities, including those who are military dependents. The present study leveraged an interrupted time series approach to compare monthly service provision rates before and after the onset of the pandemic for a subset of children served by the Army Medical Department’s Educational and Developmental Intervention Services EI program. Analysis identified 77% and 93% immediate step decreases in EI referral and enrollment rates, respectively, following the onset of the pandemic in March 2020; however, rates returned to, or exceeded, prepandemic levels by late 2020. There were limited differences by race or ethnicity. Additional research is necessary to explore the mechanisms underlying these changes and to understand the long-term impact of missed referrals and enrollments on military children.
Q2

Early Intervention Special Instructors: Demographics, Titles, Qualifications, and the Need for Consistency
Childress D.C., Parks S., Schumaker-Murphy M., Frick T., Wilson C.
Relatively little is known about the providers of early intervention (EI) special instruction in the United States EI system. To address this gap, this cross-sectional study used a national internet survey and public records search to gather information about the demographics of providers, the professional labels used by states to refer to special instruction, the titles assigned to its providers, and the educational and professional requirements for professionals in this role. Findings suggest that special instructors are primarily well-educated, White females working in local/regional EI agencies and other community agencies, often in blended roles. There are a variety of service labels and professional titles used across the country to refer to special instruction and its providers. Educational and professional requirements also vary across the field. Implications for this lack of consistency and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Q2

Culturally Responsive Early Intervention for Marginalized Families of Young Autistic Children: A Qualitative Inquiry
Lee J.D., Terol A.K., Yoon C.D., Boyd B.
Although early intervention is known to be effective in promoting positive child and family outcomes, not all families equally benefit from these services due to issues of access. Disparities are known to occur in the publicly funded early intervention system, which are exacerbated among marginalized families with diverse backgrounds, including cultural or linguistic differences. To examine determinants of culturally responsive early intervention, we conducted a qualitative study with 15 early intervention providers who work with marginalized families and their young child. We used a set of interview questions based on the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework to better understand the barriers, facilitators, and suggestions from providers in the field. Through thematic coding, we identified facilitators, barriers, and suggestions at the provider, organization, and systemic levels to provide culturally responsive early intervention services for marginalized families. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Q2

Investigating Caregivers’ Advocacy Efforts in Early Intervention Using Auto-Photography and Photo-Elicitation Interviews
Schraml-Block K.M., Ostrosky M.M.
Although it is widely known that caregivers advocate for their school-aged children with disabilities, little is understood about how caregivers who have infants and toddlers with delays or disabilities advocate for their young children. The birth-to-three period may be the beginning of some parents’ advocacy efforts and it is possible their efforts may change over time. Given the relevance of this topic and the limited literature, the purpose of this study was to use qualitative inquiry, specifically auto-photography and photo-elicitation interviews, to explore 13 caregivers’ advocacy experiences in their children’s early years. Thematic and constant comparative analyses were used and subsequently 41 major codes within seven categories were identified. The two major findings were (a) caregivers engaged in both individual (i.e., for their children) and outreach advocacy activities (i.e., for other families and children) and (b) their experiences extended beyond interactions with professionals and included everyday interactions with their children, family members and other parents. Directions for future research and implications for practice are discussed.
Q2

Authentic Assessment of Executive Functions in Early Childhood: A Scoping Review
Londono M.C., Dionne C., Lacharité C.
Executive functions (EFs) are cognitive skills that begin developing in early life and are crucial for children’s overall development and daily task performance. Generally, EFs are assessed through standardized neuropsychological tests, which may not always accurately capture real-world application. To overcome this limitation, alternative methods such as authentic assessment have emerged. A scoping review was conducted to map the information available regarding the authentic assessment of EFs in children under 6 years of age from 2010 to 2021. Out of 790 documents, 32 met the eligibility criteria after full-text revision. Two rating scales emerged as the most used EFs assessment instruments. The documents did not explicitly mention the term “authentic assessment.” Four commonly assessed EFs were identified. Findings highlight the need to develop multidimensional authentic assessment instruments to assess early EFs skills in all children. This includes children at risk or with developmental disabilities, and children from families with incomes below the poverty threshold.
Q2

A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness and Feasibility of an Early Intervention Leadership Program for Families of Children With Disabilities
Burke M., Li C., Fulton K., Cheung W.C.
While there are opportunities for families to fulfill leadership roles in early intervention, families often report feeling disempowered and unprepared to become leaders. To this end, in this pilot study, we evaluated the effectiveness and feasibility of an 8-hour leadership program for 20 parents of children who are receiving, or recently received, early intervention services. Participants demonstrated significant increases in early intervention knowledge and empowerment after completing the leadership program. The program had high attendance, low attrition, and high fidelity to the curriculum. Participants were overwhelmingly satisfied with the program and suggested a longer program duration. Initial efficacy and participant enthusiasm suggest a need to consider program implementation more broadly with the goal of increasing parent leadership and involvement in early intervention.
Q2

Evaluating a Rapid Coaching Intervention Delivered Remotely to Families
Lane J.D., Lonnemann G., Matthews K., Fosnaught R., Lynch K.
Families are central to promoting communication in young children with disabilities with complex communication needs. Providing coaching on naturalistic language interventions (NLI) gives parents tools for independently intervening on communication across activities in the home. Both parents and professionals have limited resources, which requires maximizing parent and professional interactions when meeting. A rapid coaching intervention delivered via distance technology is one approach for addressing this issue. In this study, a multiple baseline across behaviors design replicated across participants was used to evaluate a rapid coaching intervention with parents. When the intervention was introduced, parents displayed improvements in naturalistic strategies and procedures. Child-level expressive communication was measured within the context of the designs, and data were variable. Improvements in the complexity of speech and responding to parents were observed. Implications are provided for future studies.
Q2

Disparities in Identification Between Migrant and Seasonal Head Start and Head Start Programs
Pedonti S.F., Leech K.A., Bratsch Hines M., Soliday Hong S.L., Able H., Crais E.
This study used a large administrative data set of Head Start programs across the United States, the Head Start Program Information Report (PIR), to explore disparities in program rates of screening, referral, and identification for early intervention between Migrant and Seasonal Head Start (MSHS) and Head Start (HS) programs. Results from program-level analyses of MSHS and HS disparities showed that MSHS programs screened more children but referred and identified fewer children. Disparities in identification persisted even in the presence of demographic controls and matching on key demographics. Post hoc sensitivity analyses showed that MSHS identification rates were negatively moderated by rurality. Implications to inform policymaking related to early intervention and preschool for children with or at risk for disabilities and dual language learners in rural Head Start programs are discussed.
Top-100
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
99 citations, 3.2%
|
|
Journal of Lightwave Technology
85 citations, 2.74%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
59 citations, 1.91%
|
|
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers & Short Notes
53 citations, 1.71%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
49 citations, 1.58%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
45 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
36 citations, 1.16%
|
|
IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics
34 citations, 1.1%
|
|
IEICE Transactions on Electronics
32 citations, 1.03%
|
|
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
31 citations, 1%
|
|
Applied Optics
30 citations, 0.97%
|
|
IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters
28 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
27 citations, 0.87%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
26 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Sensors
23 citations, 0.74%
|
|
IEEE Access
23 citations, 0.74%
|
|
IEEE Photonics Technology Letters
21 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Thin Solid Films
21 citations, 0.68%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
17 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
16 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Optics Express
16 citations, 0.52%
|
|
IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
14 citations, 0.45%
|
|
IEEE Sensors Journal
13 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision
13 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
12 citations, 0.39%
|
|
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics
12 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Physical Review A
12 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal Physics D: Applied Physics
12 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
12 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Physical Review B
11 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part II Electronics)
11 citations, 0.36%
|
|
IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters
10 citations, 0.32%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
10 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Microwave and Optical Technology Letters
10 citations, 0.32%
|
|
IEICE Electronics Express
10 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical
10 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Optics Communications
10 citations, 0.32%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Review of Scientific Instruments
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
MRS Proceedings
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Optics Letters
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Superconductor Science and Technology
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEJ Transactions on Fundamentals and Materials
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Materials Science Forum
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Micromachines
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Smart Materials and Structures
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
IEEE Electron Device Letters
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Scientific Reports
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Measurement Science and Technology
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Microelectronic Engineering
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Ferroelectrics
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Proceedings of the IEEE
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Optical Engineering
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Electronics
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
AIP Advances
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Optics and Laser Technology
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Photonics
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Optical and Quantum Electronics
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Difference Equations and Applications
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nanotechnology
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of the Society for Information Display
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Energies
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Components Hybrids and Manufacturing Technology
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applied Physics Reviews
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
941 citations, 30.38%
|
|
Elsevier
283 citations, 9.14%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
158 citations, 5.1%
|
|
Springer Nature
151 citations, 4.88%
|
|
Wiley
128 citations, 4.13%
|
|
AIP Publishing
95 citations, 3.07%
|
|
IOP Publishing
81 citations, 2.62%
|
|
MDPI
71 citations, 2.29%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
65 citations, 2.1%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
50 citations, 1.61%
|
|
33 citations, 1.07%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
33 citations, 1.07%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
28 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
25 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
23 citations, 0.74%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
19 citations, 0.61%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
18 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
16 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
15 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
14 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
12 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
11 citations, 0.36%
|
|
9 citations, 0.29%
|
|
World Scientific
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Electromagnetics Academy
8 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
SAGE
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
ASME International
7 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Emerald
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
EDP Sciences
3 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
3 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Korean Society of Precision Engineering
3 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Oxford University Press
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Chinese Ceramic Society
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Ceramic Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine - Institute of Semiconductor Physics
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Science in China Press
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IGI Global
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Royal Society
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
IWA Publishing
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Information Processing Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Shanghai Jiaotong University Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Brazilian Microwave and Optoelectronics Society
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Ain Shams University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Science Alert
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
RTU MIREA
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Carbon Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Magnetics Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Fiber Society
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Laser Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Research Institute of Signal Processing, Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Imaging Science & Technology
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
SAE International
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Tech Science Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Japan Fluid Power Systems Society
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Cryogenic Association of Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Group Dynamics Association
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Technical Association of Photopolymers, Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (67 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
Hokkaido University
141 publications, 5.81%
|
|
Osaka University
134 publications, 5.52%
|
|
Tohoku University
121 publications, 4.98%
|
|
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
82 publications, 3.38%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
76 publications, 3.13%
|
|
Toshiba Corporation
53 publications, 2.18%
|
|
Nihon University
52 publications, 2.14%
|
|
Nippon Electric Company
51 publications, 2.1%
|
|
Keio University
47 publications, 1.94%
|
|
University of Tokyo
46 publications, 1.89%
|
|
Kumamoto University
38 publications, 1.57%
|
|
Kitami Institute of Technology
36 publications, 1.48%
|
|
Fujitsu Limited
35 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Shizuoka University
30 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Kyushu University
27 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Waseda University
27 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Yamaguchi University
26 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Ehime University
26 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Kyoto University
25 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Electro-Communications
23 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
22 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Tokyo University of Science
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Saitama University
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
National Defense Academy of Japan
20 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Tokyo Denki University
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Tokai University
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Chiba University
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Shinshu University
19 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Kanazawa University
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Nara Institute of Science and Technology
18 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Niigata University
17 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Doshisha University
17 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
16 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Nagoya University
16 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Sony Group Corporation
16 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Nagaoka University of Technology
16 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Utsunomiya University
15 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Tamagawa University
15 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Okayama University
14 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Yokohama National University
13 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Muroran Institute of Technology
13 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Toyohashi University of Technology
13 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Fukui
13 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Kyushu Institute of Technology
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Gifu University
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Hosei University
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Osaka Electro-Communication University
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Hiroshima University
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Osaka Metropolitan University
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Yamagata University
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Kyoto Institute of Technology
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Kansai University
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Ibaraki University
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Hiroshima City University
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Osaka Institute of Technology
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Aoyama Gakuin University
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Tohoku Institute of Technology
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Hokkai Gakuen University
9 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Kagoshima University
9 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Toyama
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of the Ryukyus
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Chiba Institute of Technology
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Ryukoku University
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Nagasaki University
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Tottori University
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Sophia University
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Saga University
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Toyota Technological Institute
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Tokyo Metropolitan University
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Iwate University
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Oita University
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Kanazawa Institute of Technology
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Japan Science and Technology Agency
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Kobe University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Ritsumeikan University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Mie University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Akita University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Chuo University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Okayama University of Science
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Hyogo
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Setsunan University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Kanagawa Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Fukuoka Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Tokushima University
4 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Gunma University
4 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Meijo University
4 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Kogakuin University
4 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Japan Atomic Energy Agency
3 publications, 0.12%
|
|
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
3 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Meiji University
3 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Fukuoka University
3 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Toyo University
3 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
2 publications, 0.08%
|
|
National Institute for Materials Science
2 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Yeungnam University
2 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishing countries
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2364, 97.36%
Japan
2364 publications, 97.36%
|
USA
|
USA, 12, 0.49%
USA
12 publications, 0.49%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 0.12%
Canada
3 publications, 0.12%
|
France
|
France, 2, 0.08%
France
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.08%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.08%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 0.04%
Germany
1 publication, 0.04%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.04%
China
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.04%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.04%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.04%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.04%
|
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
3 profile journal articles
Uno Toru

Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
132 publications,
547 citations
h-index: 13