Open Access
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2
Years of issue
2024-2025
journal names
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
J MED EDUC CURRIC DE
Top-3 citing journals

BMC Medical Education
(369 citations)

Medical Science Educator
(130 citations)

Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
(119 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
(7 publications)

Harvard University
(6 publications)

Yale University
(4 publications)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
(6 publications)

Harvard University
(6 publications)

Yale University
(4 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2022
Q2

A study on the effect of inerters in the motor elastic suspension on the stability of bogies in high-speed trains
Qi Y., Ao P., Dai H., Liu H., Wu H., Tang G.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Inerters are widely used in structural vibration systems, but there is little research on their use in the elastic-suspension of motors in high-speed train bogies. The type of the motor suspension significantly influences its vibration characteristics. To fill this gap, this paper proposes the use of the frequency-variable characteristics of the inertia spring damping (ISD) structure. The motor elastic-suspension bogie dynamic model with the inerter was established, and the effect of the motor suspension parameters on the stability of the bogie system was studied. Finally, the inertia-suspension parameters were optimized by the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-Ⅱ (NSGA-Ⅱ) multi-objective optimization algorithm. The results showed that the ISD structure has frequency-varying characteristics, and the maximum equivalent stiffness and damping exist in the low frequency range (approximately 10 Hz). As the equivalent conicity increases, the optimal lateral frequency and damping ratio of the motor increase, which makes the inerter suspension bogie to meet this characteristic. The optimized motor suspension parameters showed that the linear critical speeds of the bogie with inerter suspension are improved, and the stability of the bogie is higher within the equivalent conicity of 0.1-0.4. This study can provide a reference for the stability design of the bogie structure in future.
Q2

Effect of wheel polygonization on the dynamic response of the electromechanical coupling system in a permanent magnet direct-drive locomotive
Ye Z., Chen Z., Zhou Z., Xu Y.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

The polygonization of railway vehicle wheelsets is a common type of fault that poses risks to the safety and stability of the vehicle. In permanent magnet direct drive locomotives, the rotations of the wheelsets are directly driven by the traction motor; thus, the abnormal vibration caused by the polygonal wheel can directly transmit to the traction system, resulting in strong electromechanical coupling vibrations. To investigate the effect of wheel polygonization on the dynamic response of the electromechanical coupling system in direct-drive locomotives, a locomotive-track coupled dynamic model is established in this paper. The unique structure of the direct drive traction system, the interaction of the wheel-rail system, as well as the electromechanical coupling path of the traction motor are comprehensively considered. Simulation results revealed that polygonal wheels can significantly amplify vibrations in the key components of the traction system; distinct frequencies related to polygons are observed in the electrical signals. Furthermore, the influence laws of wave depth and order of polygonal wear on the dynamic performance of the locomotive components are revealed. These research findings provide theoretical references for health monitoring and operation maintenance of wheel polygonization in permanent magnet direct drive locomotives.
Q2

A parallel method for assessing track segment quality in railway maintenance
Guo J., Liu J., Tian X., Yang J., Zhang Y., Tao K.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Track Quality Index (TQI) is a crucial indicator for assessing the condition of rail and rapid transit tracks. With the rapid increase of railway mileage and the complexity of processing large volumes of track inspection data, traditional methods that rely on a single device to process track geometry inspection data and calculate TQI no longer meet the efficiency and accuracy requirements of modern railways. This paper aims to propose a parallel method for assessing TQI track maintenance. The method is based on a multi-node data platform, using parallel computing technology to distribute different tasks in TQI calculation process such as track inspection data mileage correction, invalid data identification, and standard deviation calculation to multiple nodes. This approach enables standardized and rapid processing of large-scale track geometry inspection data. Using track geometry inspection data from various lengths of high-speed railway lines in China to test the proposed method, the results show that the new method significantly improves computational efficiency compared to traditional methods while maintaining high accuracy. The application of this method will greatly enhance the efficiency and accuracy of railway maintenance, providing robust technical support for the management and maintenance of railway infrastructure.
Q2

Effects of asymmetric terrains near tunnel entrances on aerodynamic characteristics of trains
Jiang J., Liu T., Gao H., Zhou M., Xia Y., Huo X., Wang X., Chen X., Xu B.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Asymmetric terrains near tunnel entrances may affect stability of railway vehicles while entering tunnels. Numerical simulations with three-dimensional, unsteady, and compressible flow are conducted on aerodynamic characteristics of trains traveling through a tunnel with asymmetric mountains with different slope angles near its entrance, including the non-mountain (flat ground), 45°-mountain, and 90°-mountain. The aerodynamic loads (the side force, rolling moment, and yawing moment) and surface pressure of the vehicles, as well as the flow around them are analyzed. A comparison between the surface pressures of the vehicle 2 in the numerical simulation and full-scale tests showed a 2.2% difference in peak-to-peak values during tunnel entry, validating the simulation results. The aerodynamic loads of the trailing vehicle are more sensitive to the slope angle of the mountain near the tunnel entrance, compared with the leading vehicle. The aerodynamic loads increase with the increase in the slope angle. The effect of the slope angle on the rolling moment is the most remarkable, and the rolling moment of the trailing vehicle with the 90°-mountain is 256.6% larger than that without a mountain. A trend in the flow toward the side with the flat ground and the limited space around the side with the mountain cause and increase the instability of the trailing vehicle when entering the tunnel. These findings provide valuable insights for designing and optimizing tunnel entrances and enhancing the stability of trains navigating asymmetric terrains.
Q2

Comparative analysis of rail pad lateral dynamic performance in metro systems
Bai Y., He Z., Qu S., Li B., Zhai W.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

The lateral stiffness and damping of rail pads significantly influence train performance on curves, yet their effects are not well understood. This study investigates the lateral dynamics of three rail pad structures: groove (GRP), mesh-type (MTRP), and mesh-type with high damping (MTHDRP), and their impact on train curve performance. Results from lateral loading tests indicate that MTHDRP pads exhibit the highest lateral static stiffness, dynamic stiffness, and damping ratio, while GRP pads have the lowest, highlighting significant performance disparities. Finite element analysis reveals substantial deformations in GRP pads under high lateral loads, leading to increased stress levels. Strategies to increase the lateral stiffness across these pad types involve structural parameter adjustment and integration of harder materials, detailed further in the conclusions. Multibody dynamic simulations suggest that decreasing lateral stiffness while increasing damping not only increases train safety on curves but also reduces track system vibration. Under varying conditions of speed, curve radius, rail slope, and superelevation, MTHDRP consistently demonstrates favorable performance, underscoring the importance of lateral dynamics in the design, manufacturing, testing, and dynamic analysis of rail pads to optimize vehicle and track performance on curves.
Q2

A new technique for temporary adhesion improvement via dry-air jetting and its application in reducing the braking distance of railway vehicles
Yamamoto D.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

This study proposes a technique to temporarily improve the friction force by jetting dry air with less than 30% humidity on the contact surface. The tangential contact force was first measured under the condition that a very small amount of water was on the contact surface and the velocity was 30 km/h to confirm that the proposed technique is effective even in rainy weather. The findings revealed that the adhesive force increased by reducing the amount of water on the contact surface. These experimental results indicate that the dry-air jetting technique effectively increases the friction coefficient, even under rainy conditions, because dry-air jetting can remove water droplets on the surface. Subsequently, an experiment was conducted on the tangential contact force using a twin-disc sliding-frictional rolling machine to verify our proposed technique under different dry conditions. The tangential contact force coefficient increased simultaneously with dry-air jetting and remained stable during dry-air jetting under dry and high-humidity environmental conditions. Furthermore, the findings clarified that the tangential contact force improvement effect of dry-air jetting depends on the combination of the contact patch and its surface properties. Finally, based on these experimental results, we compared the same rail vehicles with and without considering the braking distance as an example of a dry-air jetting system application, using a vehicle dynamics analysis constructed using the SIMPACK commercial software. Consequently, the validity of the proposed technique was confirmed for actual rail vehicles.
Q2

Optimization design of curved rail profile for heavy-haul railways based on multi-period optimization method
Xu B., Ge X., Shi Z., Yang Y., Chen S., Wang J., Wang K.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Rail grinding is widely employed in heavy-haul railways to mitigate abnormal rail wear. However, frequent grinding can result in even more significant material loss than regular wear. This paper presents a method for adjusting track layout parameters to alleviate the severe rail wear problem on curved lines. First, field experiments and simulation analysis have been used to analyze the impact of track parameters on wheel-rail contact and the feasibility of parameter adjustment. A numerical optimization model has been established based on Genetic Algorithm-Levenberg Marquardt- Backpropagation neural networks (GA-LM-BP neural network), with the track parameters as the independent variable and the goal of reducing wear as the objective. The chaotic microvariation adaptive genetic algorithm has been used to obtain an optimized solution set. Finally, the optimization effects are revealed by comparing the rail wear characteristics obtained from the original values and the optimal solution set.
Q2

A study of the effect of grinding machine parameters on acoustic rail roughness and surface quality
Wilkes J.A., Thompson D.J.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Rail grinding is performed by infrastructure managers to control, reduce or prevent the growth of rail defects, such as rolling contact fatigue and corrugation. This is done using preventive methods (to attempt to prevent defects from forming) or corrective methods (to remove defects present in the rail). Trials were undertaken on preventive rail grinding machines used by Network Rail, with the aim of improving the finished quality of the rail whilst still achieving the metal removal and reprofiling required. An important aspect considered in the trials was the acoustic rail roughness and its relationship with grinding surface quality indices. The results demonstrated that, in the case of the operational machines used by Network Rail, the largest impact on the overall surface quality was the age and conditioning of the grinding stones. The trials also demonstrated the differences in Standard requirements for achieving good surface quality indices for grinding and good acoustic roughness levels. They further highlighted the importance of identifying rail corrugation prior to preventive grinding to reduce the likelihood of the grinding signature increasing roughness at corrugation wavelengths.
Q2

Algorithm-based strategy to define an equivalent railway track for wear simulations
Augusto de Paula Pacheco P., Valente Lopes M., Correa P.H., Bosso N., Magelli M., Zampieri N., Antunes dos Santos A.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Multibody simulations of train dynamics commonly employ generic short tracks to validate and observe the behaviour of wagons in certain conditions. However, for proper wheel wear analysis, the entire railway track should be modelled, increasing computational cost and time to obtain worn profiles and wear parameters. The major novelty of this work is the description of a reproducible algorithm-based methodology to obtain a statistically representative shorter equivalent railway track for wear simulations. The proposed methodology includes combining a real measured track with multibody dynamic simulation. To verify the approach, a case study was conducted on a 505 km-long railway in Brazil. Additionally, two distinct vehicles were employed: a European wagon with a standard gauge and a Brazilian wagon with a meter gauge. The shorter equivalent tracks were compared in terms of worn area and wear depth to the initial track, and the generated tracks were cross-compared between vehicles to verify the robustness of the method. It is observed that wear simulations can be performed more efficiently and effectively, reducing the computational time by at least 94%, while still obtaining accurate results, given that the final equivalent tracks were 18.59 times shorter for the Brazilian model and 22.45 times shorter for the European model comparing to the real track, with the maximum deviation being 6.55% in flange depth and with a maximum root mean-square error (RMSE) of 871 nm.
Q2

A field methodology to assess the performance of rail cleaning, using a new portable tribometer
White B., Watson M., Jaffe J., Lewis R.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Low adhesion between wheel and rail can be caused by autumn leaf fall, reacting and adhering with the steel, resulting in signals passed at danger, station overruns or in worst cases derailments and collisions. Various methods to remove this layer or increase friction have been developed including water jetting, abrasive cleaning, traction gels and chemical treatments, new interventions are trialled each year. However, representative low friction conditions are difficult to generate repeatedly and measure, as such the efficacy of these interventions remains difficult to establish. Twenty years ago British Rail Research stated “Paradoxically it has been the lack of low adhesion that has hindered the development of low adhesion remedies”. This still remains largely true today. In this paper a method is proposed to form a representative organic layer, by placing powdered leaf material on the railhead and rolling with a vehicle until it has blackened and bonded to the underlying steel. The layers were visually inspected using industry guidelines and their friction was measured using the new Rivelin Rail PRT300 tribometer. The method was found to be capable of reliably producing contamination levels from light to heavy as required for testing by varying the quantity of leaves added. Friction coefficients for medium and heavily contaminated rails were all below 0.05, these would typically be described as ultra-low adhesion. As an illustration of the method, a trial of a new (anonymised) railhead cleaning technique is included in this work as a case study. The layer formation and measurement methodology proposed could be adopted by the wider rail industry to provide a more data-driven approach to understanding friction enhancer and railhead cleaning technology performance, through optimising current treatments and assessing the performance of novel technology.
Q2

An integrated approach for fatigue design of rail vehicle suspensions under block loading
Luo R.K., Thompson M., Xu J., Li X.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

In this case study, we introduce a new approach by applying the most recent fatigue criterion, effective tensile stress, to a rail vehicle suspension spring for the first time. Without the need for curve fitting, this criterion can effectively predict fatigue life under positive and negative R ratios. We defined a general S-N function and failure rates based on published results from cylindrical dumbbell samples on 30 fatigue cases. The measured load-displacement curve validated the material model with an elastic constant ratio. Blocks of three different loading sets were applied to a rail vehicle suspension spring for 125k cycles. One crack initiation was observed at 82k cycles and propagated to 97 mm after the test. We successfully predicted crack initiation at 81k cycles (with a failure rate of 7%) and 92k cycles (with a failure rate of 10%) using the Palmgren–Miner law. This prediction agreed with the experiment’s observation, demonstrating the approach’s reliability. The general S-N function could be used for the design and failure analysis of rail vehicle suspensions, providing reassurance in the design process.
Q2

Train-velocity-filtering of wayside noise to measure grind effectiveness when targeting variable wavelength rail corrugation
Carneiro J., Lasisi A., Regehr J., Jeffrey I., Magel E., Chénier S., Reimer M.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

We propose and apply novel corrugation and corrugation-related noise metrics designed to help maintainers monitor corrugation actively (on rail) or passively (by proxy through noise) at locations in a transit property. The novelty of our approach consists of incorporating wavelength-variable corrugation filtering, and wavelength- and velocity-dependent noise weighting into existing rail corrugation and wayside noise metrics primarily for municipal rail maintenance. The modified metrics isolate corrugation and corrugation-related noise in a manner tailored to a property’s operational characteristics, such as train velocity. The proposed modified metrics are applied to a data set collected from a pre- and post-grind monitoring regimen at 17 measurement sites in a North American property to investigate their responses. This study demonstrates the benefit of adapting the filtering methodology used to produce summary corrugation statistics to suit a specific property’s corrugation needs. It also demonstrates the need to include target corrugation wavelengths and approximate train velocity to appropriately weight the noise spectrum in a sample. These developments supplement the available methods that property maintainers can adopt to monitor corrugation conditions at discrete locations throughout a system by providing tools/metrics that are specifically designed to correctly assess the appropriate wavelength of corrugation on the rail face, thereby allowing maintainers to then accurately monitor corrugation via noise by means of passive wayside measurements.
Q2

Ultrasonic guided wave detection of point rail damage of high-speed railway turnout
Tian C., Feng X., Qian Y., Yuan Y., Xu J., Chen R., Jiang W., Hu C.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

The precise and efficient identification of damage in point rails of turnouts represents a critical and challenging technological issue that requires immediate attention. Guided wave inspection, as a non-destructive testing method, holds significant potential for practical applications in the research field focused on the identification of damage in point rails of high-speed railway turnouts. This study integrates rigorous theoretical analysis, advanced numerical simulation techniques, and meticulous experimental investigations to comprehensively investigate the excitation, propagation, and reception processes of ultrasonic-guided waves within the point rail. By strategically applying excitation signals at optimized positions specifically tailored for point rail detection, employing a frequency of 30 kHz, appropriate excitation modes are carefully selected. Defect identification within the extended point rail is performed from a dual perspective, encompassing both cross-correlation analysis and time-frequency analysis. The obtained results substantiate that when employing the cross-correlation coefficient to detect cracks in the elongated point rail, the sensitivity of crack detection is significantly higher in the rail bottom region as opposed to the rail head region. Furthermore, through the analysis of variations in the cross-correlation coefficient and the application of wavelet transformations to the guided wave signals, it is not only feasible to ascertain the presence and location of damages within the rail base region of the extended point rail but also to evaluate the relative size of the cracks. The findings of this research contribute a robust theoretical foundation for the subsequent analysis and evaluation of damage detection in high-speed turnout point rails.
Q2

Application of waste materials for concrete and composite railway sleeper production: A review
Safari F., Rezaie M., Esmaeili M., Habibnejad Korayem A.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Railways are more energy efficient than any other mode of transportation, offering an opportunity to reduce energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and air pollution. However, to reduce the high maintenance costs and activities, the application of waste materials in the railway industry has received attention; they are used as ballast, sub-ballast, and sleeper constituent elements. Sleepers have shown promising potential for recycled material usage, and concrete and composite sleepers have received more attention. Therefore, railway sleepers employ a variety of materials such as waste rubber, silica fume, slag, fibres, fly ash, coal ash, recycled concrete aggregate, and recycled plastics. Considering the vast scope of the subject, a comprehensive technical study gap in producing sleepers with waste material applications is perceived. This paper is written to collect the investigations on waste materials application on the physical, mechanical, dynamical, and durability performance of railway sleepers. In this paper, concrete and composite railway sleepers have been considered. Then, waste impacts are gathered, compared, tabulated, and the mechanisms are discussed to evaluate the study focus and scope for future research. This study shows that silica fume, slag, and fly ash improved the mechanical properties of concrete sleepers, while crumb rubber negatively affected the mentioned properties and increased the concrete damping capability. Pozzolans are noted to have a positive role in durability characteristics. Fibres improved the mechanical and durability performance of composite sleepers. Rubber has also improved the durability and flexibility of composite sleepers but decreased strength.
Q2

Smart railways: AI-based track-side monitoring for wheel flat identification
Mohammadi M., Mosleh A., Vale C., Ribeiro D., Montenegro P., Meixedo A.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 1
|
Abstract

The wheel flat detection in trains using Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical advancement in railway maintenance and safety practices. AI systems can effectively identify geometric deformation in wheel rotation patterns, indicative of potential wheel flat damage, resorting to wayside monitoring systems and machine learning algorithms. This study aims to propose an unsupervised learning algorithm to identify and localize railway wheel flats, which considers three stages: (i) wheel flat detection to distinguish a healthy wheel from a damaged one using outlier analysis, achieving 100 percent accuracy; (ii) localizing the damage to pinpoint the location of the defective wheel through the Hidden Markov Model (HMM); (iii) classification of wheel damage based on its severity using k-means clustering technique. The unsupervised learning algorithm is validated with artificial data attained from a virtual wayside monitoring system related to freight train passages with healthy wheels and defective wheels with single and multiple defects. The proposed methodology demonstrated efficiency and robustness for wheel flat detection, localization, and damage severity classification regardless of the number of defective wheels and their position.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
|
BMC Medical Education
369 citations, 8.34%
|
|
Medical Science Educator
130 citations, 2.94%
|
|
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
119 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Cureus
106 citations, 2.39%
|
|
Medical Teacher
75 citations, 1.69%
|
|
Anatomical Sciences Education
67 citations, 1.51%
|
|
JMIR Medical Education
51 citations, 1.15%
|
|
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
48 citations, 1.08%
|
|
PLoS ONE
46 citations, 1.04%
|
|
BMJ Open
44 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
44 citations, 0.99%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
43 citations, 0.97%
|
|
MedEdPublish
41 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
39 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Academic Medicine
38 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Medical Education Online
37 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Medical Education
34 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Dental Education
25 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Journal of Surgical Education
23 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
22 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
22 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Advances in Health Sciences Education
22 citations, 0.5%
|
|
American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
21 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Clinical Teacher
21 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
21 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
21 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Education Sciences
20 citations, 0.45%
|
|
BMC Palliative Care
19 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Healthcare
19 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Nurse Education Today
17 citations, 0.38%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
16 citations, 0.36%
|
|
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
15 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
15 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Frontiers in Education
15 citations, 0.34%
|
|
AEM Education and Training
14 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
14 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Sustainability
13 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
13 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Heliyon
13 citations, 0.29%
|
|
European Journal of Dental Education
12 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
12 citations, 0.27%
|
|
The Journal of Climate Change and Health
12 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Clinical Anatomy
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Nurse Education in Practice
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Academic Pediatrics
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Academic Radiology
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
BMC Nursing
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Advances in Medical Education, Research, and Ethics
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Cancer Education
9 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Education for Primary Care
9 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Scientific Reports
9 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Southern Medical Journal
9 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Postgraduate Medical Journal
9 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Academic Psychiatry
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Medical Education
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Educacion Medica
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Perspectives on Medical Education
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
BMC Medical Ethics
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Hospital Medicine
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Patient Education and Counseling
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Behavioral Sciences
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Pediatrics
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of primary care & community health
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
JMIR Formative Research
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
ATS Scholar
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Innovative Digital Practices and Globalization in Higher Education
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Physician Assistant Education
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Robotic Surgery
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annals of Anatomy
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Professional Nursing
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Surgeon
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Journal of Surgery
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Pharmacy
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Health Science Reports
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Discover Education
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Medical Informatics
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Interactive Learning Environments
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Teaching and Learning in Nursing
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Nutrients
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
National Medical Journal of India
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Medical Journal Armed Forces India
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Evaluation Review
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
LGBT Health
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Surgical Research
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Springer Nature
1104 citations, 24.94%
|
|
Elsevier
533 citations, 12.04%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
389 citations, 8.79%
|
|
Wiley
367 citations, 8.29%
|
|
SAGE
247 citations, 5.58%
|
|
MDPI
193 citations, 4.36%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
182 citations, 4.11%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
165 citations, 3.73%
|
|
JMIR Publications
128 citations, 2.89%
|
|
BMJ
74 citations, 1.67%
|
|
IGI Global
58 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
51 citations, 1.15%
|
|
F1000 Research
46 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Oxford University Press
44 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Emerald
41 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
36 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
29 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
28 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Medknow
26 citations, 0.59%
|
|
American Physiological Society
23 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
22 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
20 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
18 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
17 citations, 0.38%
|
|
SciELO
16 citations, 0.36%
|
|
American Dental Education Association
14 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
14 citations, 0.32%
|
|
SLACK
13 citations, 0.29%
|
|
AOSIS
12 citations, 0.27%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
11 citations, 0.25%
|
|
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
9 citations, 0.2%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
9 citations, 0.2%
|
|
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IntechOpen
8 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
AIP Publishing
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Society of Hospital Medicine
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
A and V Publications
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
CMA Impact Inc.
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Southern Medical Association
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IOS Press
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
EDP Sciences
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of California Press
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American College of Physicians
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Associacao Nacional de Pos-graduacao e Pesquisa em Educacao
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Royal College of Psychiatrists
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Association of Military Surgeons of the US
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Society of Medical Education
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Hans Publishers
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
The Royal Society
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
International Journal of Information and Education Technology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
ifmbe proceedings
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Medcom Limited
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Management
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing organizations
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
7 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Harvard University
6 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Yale University
4 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
3 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Ottawa
3 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
3 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Brown University
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Mayo Clinic Arizona
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Toronto
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Wright State University
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Miami
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Wake Forest University
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Texas Medical Branch
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Majmaah University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Koc University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Zanjan University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Istanbul Medipol University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Akdeniz University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Health Sciences, Lahore
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Dow University of Health Sciences
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
North Bengal Medical College and Hospital
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Qatar University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Southwest University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Griffith University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Stanford University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Tokyo Medical University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Georgetown University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of the Free State
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Dalhousie University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Makerere University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Northwestern University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Kampala International University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Gulu University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Missouri–Kansas City
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
New York University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Mass General Brigham
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Harbor–UCLA Medical Center
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of California, Davis
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Keele University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Michigan
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of British Columbia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Technical University of Braunschweig
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Essen University Hospital
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Anglia Ruskin University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Manitoba
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Kentucky
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Texas Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Texas A&M University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
University of Utah
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Omdurman Islamic University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Aga Khan University Nairobi
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
1 publication, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
Harvard University
6 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
6 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Yale University
4 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Ottawa
3 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Brown University
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Mayo Clinic Arizona
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Toronto
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Wright State University
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Miami
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Wake Forest University
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Texas Medical Branch
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
2 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Majmaah University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Koc University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Zanjan University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Istanbul Medipol University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Akdeniz University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Health Sciences, Lahore
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Dow University of Health Sciences
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
North Bengal Medical College and Hospital
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Qatar University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Southwest University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Griffith University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Stanford University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Tokyo Medical University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Georgetown University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of the Free State
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Dalhousie University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Makerere University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Northwestern University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Kampala International University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Gulu University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Missouri–Kansas City
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
New York University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Mass General Brigham
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Harbor–UCLA Medical Center
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of California, Davis
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Keele University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Michigan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of British Columbia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Technical University of Braunschweig
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Essen University Hospital
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Anglia Ruskin University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Manitoba
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Kentucky
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Texas Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Texas A&M University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of Utah
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Omdurman Islamic University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Aga Khan University Nairobi
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
University of New England
1 publication, 0.16%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 398, 53%
USA
398 publications, 53%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 52, 6.92%
Canada
52 publications, 6.92%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 45, 5.99%
United Kingdom
45 publications, 5.99%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 29, 3.86%
Australia
29 publications, 3.86%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 17, 2.26%
Saudi Arabia
17 publications, 2.26%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 15, 2%
Germany
15 publications, 2%
|
China
|
China, 15, 2%
China
15 publications, 2%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 13, 1.73%
UAE
13 publications, 1.73%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 12, 1.6%
Singapore
12 publications, 1.6%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 8, 1.07%
Netherlands
8 publications, 1.07%
|
India
|
India, 7, 0.93%
India
7 publications, 0.93%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 0.93%
Ireland
7 publications, 0.93%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 7, 0.93%
New Zealand
7 publications, 0.93%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 6, 0.8%
Belgium
6 publications, 0.8%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 6, 0.8%
Iran
6 publications, 0.8%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 6, 0.8%
Pakistan
6 publications, 0.8%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 5, 0.67%
Lebanon
5 publications, 0.67%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 5, 0.67%
Nigeria
5 publications, 0.67%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 0.53%
Egypt
4 publications, 0.53%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 4, 0.53%
Qatar
4 publications, 0.53%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 0.53%
Turkey
4 publications, 0.53%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 0.53%
Switzerland
4 publications, 0.53%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 0.53%
Japan
4 publications, 0.53%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 3, 0.4%
Bahrain
3 publications, 0.4%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.4%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.4%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.4%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.4%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.4%
Israel
3 publications, 0.4%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.4%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.4%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 0.4%
Malaysia
3 publications, 0.4%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 3, 0.4%
Nepal
3 publications, 0.4%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 3, 0.4%
Puerto Rico
3 publications, 0.4%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 3, 0.4%
Uganda
3 publications, 0.4%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 0.4%
South Africa
3 publications, 0.4%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.27%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 2, 0.27%
Botswana
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.27%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.27%
Ghana
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 2, 0.27%
Guatemala
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.27%
Italy
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.27%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.27%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 2, 0.27%
Malawi
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.27%
Malta
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.27%
Norway
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.27%
Romania
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.27%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.27%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.27%
Finland
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 2, 0.27%
Jamaica
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.13%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.13%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Aruba
|
Aruba, 1, 0.13%
Aruba
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.13%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.13%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 1, 0.13%
Gambia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.13%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.13%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.13%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.13%
Oman
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.13%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.13%
Poland
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.13%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.13%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 1, 0.13%
Syria
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.13%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.13%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.13%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.13%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.13%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.13%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.13%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Show all (41 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
USA
|
USA, 228, 37.56%
USA
228 publications, 37.56%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 38, 6.26%
Canada
38 publications, 6.26%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 23, 3.79%
United Kingdom
23 publications, 3.79%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 11, 1.81%
Germany
11 publications, 1.81%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 10, 1.65%
Australia
10 publications, 1.65%
|
China
|
China, 9, 1.48%
China
9 publications, 1.48%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 9, 1.48%
Saudi Arabia
9 publications, 1.48%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 6, 0.99%
Iran
6 publications, 0.99%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.99%
UAE
6 publications, 0.99%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 0.82%
Belgium
5 publications, 0.82%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 0.82%
Netherlands
5 publications, 0.82%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 0.82%
Pakistan
5 publications, 0.82%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 5, 0.82%
Singapore
5 publications, 0.82%
|
India
|
India, 4, 0.66%
India
4 publications, 0.66%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 0.66%
Ireland
4 publications, 0.66%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.49%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.49%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 3, 0.49%
Qatar
3 publications, 0.49%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.49%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.49%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 3, 0.49%
Nepal
3 publications, 0.49%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 3, 0.49%
Puerto Rico
3 publications, 0.49%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 0.49%
Japan
3 publications, 0.49%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 2, 0.33%
Botswana
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.33%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.33%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.33%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.33%
Italy
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.33%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.33%
Malta
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.33%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.33%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.33%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.33%
Romania
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.33%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.33%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.33%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.33%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 2, 0.33%
Jamaica
2 publications, 0.33%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.16%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.16%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.16%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.16%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.16%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.16%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.16%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.16%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.16%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.16%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.16%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.16%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.16%
Poland
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.16%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.16%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 1, 0.16%
Syria
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.16%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.16%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.16%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.16%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.16%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.16%
Finland
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.16%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.16%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.16%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Show all (30 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
1 profile journal article
DOGRU OMER
47 publications,
231 citations
h-index: 9
1 profile journal article
Marya Anand
87 publications,
802 citations
h-index: 17