Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q3
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
0.7
SJR
0.365
CiteScore
2.1
Categories
Education
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2009-2025
journal names
Pedagogies
Pedagogies An International Journal
Top-3 citing journals

Pedagogies
(150 citations)

Teaching and Teacher Education
(54 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Nanyang Technological University
(31 publications)

Brock University
(11 publications)

Michigan State University
(10 publications)

Nanyang Technological University
(14 publications)

University of California, Santa Cruz
(4 publications)

Murdoch University
(3 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 571
Q2

High precision, high time-cadence measurements of the MgII index of solar activity by the GOES-R Extreme Ultraviolet Irradiance Sensor 2: EUVS-C initial flight performance
E McClintock W., Snow M., Eden T., Eparvier F., Machol J., Woodraska D.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
EUVS-C is one component of the Extreme Ultraviolet Irradiance Sensor (EUVS) instrument. EUVS together with the X-ray sensor (XRS) comprise the Extreme Ultraviolet and X-ray Irradiances Sensors (EXIS) investigation (Machol et al. 2020) aboard the GOES-R satellite series which includes GOES-16, -17, -18, and -19. From their vantage points in geostationary orbit, the EUVS-C instruments measure the solar Mg II Index, also referred to as the Mg II core-to-wing-ratio, which is a proxy for chromosphere activity and correlates with solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) emission. Mg II produces two bright chromosphere emission lines appearing in the sun’s spectrum at 279.55 nm and 280.71 nm (Mg II k and h) that appear in the cores of their respective photospheric absorption lines. Measuring the ratio of emission from the core (chromsopheric) to that from the wings (photospheric) provides an index that is relatively insensitive to changes in instrument performance. In 2005, Snow & McClintock used 0.1nm resolution data to show that the intrinsic solar variability in the index (as opposed to instrument noise) is on the order of 0.2% on time scales 5-10 minutes. EUVS-C is designed to exceed these performance requirements. A companion paper describes the instrument design and its pre-flight calibration. This paper describes the operational implementation for the algorithm that produces the Index, flight calibrations, and the initial instrument flight performance. Each EUVS-C currently operating (GOES-16, -17, and -18) is providing high time-cadence (3 seconds), high precision (1 part in 104) Index determinations. Spectral shifts arising from spacecraft orbital motion introduce a systematic 0.1% diurnal variation in absolute index values. Additionally, wavelength dependent radiometric responsivity degradation leads to a systematic increase in the reported index on a timescale of years at an average rate of 0.2% per year. These systematic effects can be mitigated with additional post data processing.
Q2

High precision, high time-cadence measurements of the Mg II index of solar activity by the GOES-R Extreme Ultraviolet Irradiance Sensor 1: EUVS-C design and preflight calibration
E McClintock W., Snow M., Crotser D., Eparvier F.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
EUVS-C is one component of the Extreme Ultraviolet Irradiance Sensor (EUVS) instrument. EUVS together with the X-ray sensor (XRS) comprise the Extreme Ultraviolet and X-ray Irradiances Sensors (EXIS) investigation aboard the GOES-R satellite series which includes GOES-16, -17, -18, and -19. From their vantage points in geostationary orbit, the EUVS-C instruments make high-precision (better than 1 part in 104), high-time-cadence (3 seconds) measurements of the solar Mg II Index with moderate (0.1 nm) spectral resolution. The Index, also referred to as the Mg II core-to-wing-ratio, is a proxy for chromosphere activity that correlates with solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) irradiance. Mg II produces two bright chromosphere emission lines in the Sun’s spectrum at 279.55 nm and 280.71 nm (Mg II k and h) that appear in the cores of their respective photospheric absorption lines. Measuring the ratio of emission from the core (chromospheric) to that from the wings (photospheric) provides an index that is relatively insensitive to changes in radiometric performance that often occur when scientific instruments observe the Sun. EUVS-C design specifications were informed by earlier research reporting index variability of approximately 0.2% on time scales of 6 – 10 minutes, increasing to approximately 0.3% and approximately 0.55% for 30 and 80 minutes, respectively. This paper describes the EUVS-C instrument design and implementation, its ground calibration and characterization, and anticipated measurement performance. A companion paper describes initial EUVS-C flight measurement performance.
Q2

Estimation of the impact of solar flare spectra on the Earth’s ionosphere using the GAIA model
Kitajima S., Watanabe K., Jin H., Tao C., Nishioka M.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
The rapid increase in X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) emissions owing to solar flares enhances ionization in the ionosphere, increasing radio wave attenuation. Among these phenomena, the shortwave communication disturbance caused by the increased electron density in the ionospheric D region is known as the shortwave fadeout (SWF). We investigated the relationship between SWF's magnitude and solar flare emission, and evaluated the electron density variation in the ionospheric D region associated with flare. We defined the minimum frequency (fmin) observed in Japan’s ionograms as the SWF’s magnitude. We analyzed ionosonde data for 38 SWF events observed during daytime in Japan between May 2010 and May 2014. To investigate the relationship between flares and SWF, we compared the observed X-ray and EUV emissions during flares with the dfmin (background subtracted fmin). X-ray (0.1-0.8 nm) and EUV (11-14 nm) emissions correlate with dfmin. Then, using the GAIA model, a numerical model that treats the entire Earth’s atmosphere, we investigated the effect of the ray and EUV solar flare emissions on the ionosphere, which affects the SWF. The results showed that the main ionization source in the ionospheric D region was X-ray emission, and shortwaves were attenuated by ∼90 %. In contrast, in the ionospheric E and F regions, the primary ionization source was EUV emission, with only ∼10 % shortwave attenuation. Finally, we estimated the fmin values and blackout (total fadeout of the ionospheric echo observed in ionograms) and compared the simulated and observed fmin values. The hit rate of blackouts was 35 % when we only used the GAIA calculations. Therefore, we estimated fmin using the electron density variation in the ionospheric D region corresponding to X-ray solar emission. As a result, the hit rate of the blackout was 68 %, and the linear correlation coefficient between the simulated and observed fmin values was 0.85. The estimated magnitude of the SWF was improved by incorporating the effects of X-ray emissions into the ionospheric D region of GAIA. We are the first to implement a method for evaluating the electron density in the ionospheric D region using the fmin value.
Q2

Solar flare rates and probabilities based on the McIntosh classification: Impacts of GOES/XRS rescaling and revisited sunspot classifications
Janssens J., Delouille V., Clette F., Andries J.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
In December 2019, the Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) started using the GOES -16 satellite as its primary input for the solar x-ray flux monitoring. As such, it stopped applying a scaling factor that had been applied since the GOES-8 came in operation. This has an important impact on the number of flares that can be expected, and on the flare rates associated with the McIntosh classifications, often used to help forecast flaring activity.
To quantify the effects, the flare intensities for the period covering 1976-2019 have all been recalculated. An increase of respectively 55% and 52% in the total number of M-class and X-class events has been observed. Also, for the same period, McIntosh classifications have been redone by visually evaluating 4720 Kanzelhöhe solar drawings (about 1 drawing every 3 days) and determining the McIntosh type of 22232 sunspot regions. There's an excellent agreement with the values originally reported by McIntosh (1990), but some deviations from the SWPC data are found.
For a majority of the McIntosh classes, an increase in the flare rates is observed, which translates into increased flare probabilities assuming a Poisson distribution for the flare occurrence. This is an important given for space weather forecasters when making solar flare forecasts. The McIntosh classification is successful in distinguishing flare active from flare inactive regions: Considering only the “p” and “c” component of the McIntosh classification and linking them to the number of flares associated with the corresponding sunspot groups, we find that 48% of all M- and X-class flares in our study are produced by only 8% of all sunspot groups, belonging to the McIntosh subclasses -ai, -kc, and -ki corresponding to sunspot groups with an asymmetric main spot and a more complex (intermediate or compact) internal sunspot distribution. About 57% of all classified sunspot groups produce only 12% of all M- and X-class flares. They belong to the McIntosh subclasses -so, -sx, -xo and -xx, which correspond to the smallest and simplest sunspot regions, and the phases marking the emergence and final decay of sunspot groups (Axx, Bxo, Hsx). Though the McIntosh classification is a great tool to forecast flaring activity, there remain large differences in the actual flaring behaviour of individual sunspot groups within the same McIntosh class.
Q2

Calibration of the Solar Position Sensor on GOES-R as a proxy for Total Solar Irradiance I: modeling the SPS bandpass
Snow M., Penton S., Woodraska D., Beland S., Coddington O.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
The Geostationary Environmental Operational Satellites R series (GOES-R) includes
an instrument that measures visible light from the Sun at high cadence:
the Solar Position Sensor (SPS).
SPS is part of the Extreme ultraviolet and X-ray Irradiance Sensors (EXIS)
instrument package.
The visible wavelength range observed by SPS
includes the peak power of the solar spectrum. Tracking the solar input to the
climate system is important at all timescales.
This article
is the first in a series that will describe using the SPS data as a high-cadence proxy
for Total Solar Irradiance (TSI), and as an input to the spectral model used in
the NOAA Climate Data Record for solar irradiance.
We describe the design of the SPS instrument
and create a model of its output using the solar spectrum measured by the
Total and Spectral Irradiance Sensor-1 (TSIS-1) on the International Space Station.
We apply the bandpasses of the SPS components to the daily TSIS-1
Solar Irradiance Monitor (SIM) spectrum and integrate over wavelength
to simulate the SPS measurement.
After applying the appropriate SPS filter transmittances and diode responsivity to the
TSIS-1/SIM spectrum, we compare the integrated irradiances
from the full SIM spectrum and the SPS model to the TSI measurement from TSIS-1.
These comparisons of daily
averages show that the integrated SPS model reproduces TSI with an uncertainty
of 53 parts per million. We also show a preliminary comparison of the SPS data to the high-cadence TSI measurements from the Digital Absolute RAdiometer
(DARA) on the FY-3E satellite.
The modeled SPS spectrum shows excellent agreement with TSI on a daily cadence.
Once all the instrument calibrations have been established, the SPS data will
be a viable operational high-cadence proxy for TSI.
Q2

Historical geomagnetic observations from the Netherlands during the Carrington event (1859)
van Dam K., Beggan C., Doornbos E., van den Oord B.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
The Carrington event of September 1859 is the best known example of an extreme geomagnetic storm, often cited when discussing space weather risks for modern infrastructure. Historic observations including auroral sightings, magnetometer records and anecdotes of impacts on telegraph systems have been widely shared before, but none of these have included observations from the Netherlands. Geomagnetic observations taken in Utrecht and Den Helder during the Carrington event were digitised from the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute’s (KNMI) yearbook of 1859, and compared to much more detailed magnetograms from London. This combined analysis, beyond its application in communication with Dutch stakeholders, contributes to a better understanding of the interpretation, limitations, and uses of such archived measurements, of which more examples might be available in archives internationally.
The observations consist of spot measurements taken three times per day. The Den Helder data only partially record the Carrington storm. Conversion factors from Den Helder have been used to estimate missing conversion factors of the Utrecht data. The correlation between the Dutch declination measurements and those made in London is strong with correlation coefficients larger than 0.7 for the Utrecht data and larger than 0.9 for the Den Helder data. However, there is very little correlation between the Dutch and British inclination measurements. The London horizontal intensity measurements compared to Den Helder data give correlation values larger than 0.8 but the observations from Utrecht match less well. There is a significant deviation between the British data and the Utrecht declination and horizontal intensity measurements during the quiet period between 30 August and 2 September. It is unclear what causes this deviation.
Given the proximity of the locations and similarity in latitude, and based on the coherent registration of the measurements, it is reasonable to assume that the magnetic traces captured in London provide a good approximation of the magnetic field variations in the Netherlands during the storm, indicating that these may be used for impact assessment studies for Dutch vital infrastructure.
Q2

Statistics of Travelling Ionospheric Disturbances Observed Using the LOFAR Radio Telescope
Boyde B., Wood A.G., Dorrian G., de Gasperin F., Mevius M.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
A climatology of Travelling Ionospheric Disturbances (TIDs) observed using the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) has been created based on 2,723 hours of astronomical observations. Radio telescopes such as LOFAR must contend with many causes of signal distortions, including the ionosphere. To produce accurate astronomical images, calibration solutions are derived to mitigate these distortions as much as possible. These calibration solutions provide extremely precise measurements of ionospheric variations across the LOFAR network, enabling TIDs to be detected which may be inaccessible to more traditional techniques. Waves are detected by LOFAR under all observing conditions, with no clear dependence on solar or geomagnetic activity. The vast majority of the observed waves travel in the opposite direction to the climatological thermospheric winds, suggesting that they are caused by upward propagating atmospheric gravity waves which are filtered by the wind. Waves of different periods display slightly different propagation directions, with waves of shorter periods consistent with the winds at lower altitudes within the thermosphere ($\SI{180}{\kilo\metre}$ for $10-\SI{15}{\minute}$ periods compared to $\SI{220}{\kilo\metre}$ for $20-\SI{27}{\minute}$ periods). This suggests that either the shorter period waves are being detected at lower altitudes or that they are simply more sensitive to the winds at lower altitudes. This indicates that observations made using LOFAR may enable the investigation of vertical coupling within the neutral atmosphere. The shortest period waves in the dataset ($<\sim\SI{10}{\minute}$) display distinct characteristics, suggesting they may be from a distinct population such as previously reported disturbances in the plasmasphere. The short period waves are compared to previous observations using other radio telescopes, showing that plasmaspheric disturbances likely account for some of the shortest period waves ($<\sim\SI{5}{\min}$) but there are still a large number of waves at these periods which are of uncertain origin.
Q2

Multi-instrument Observations of Ionospheric Super Plasma Bubbles in the European Longitude Sector during the 23–24 April 2023 Severe Geomagnetic Storm
Zakharenkova I., Cherniak I., Braun J.J., Wu Q., Sokolovskiy S., Hunt D., Weiss J.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
This study’s objective is to better specify the rare occurrence of super equatorial plasma bubbles in particular in the European longitude sector, detailing their spatio-temporal evolution, and better understanding pre-conditions for their development. Our comprehensive multi-instrument analysis combined ground-based and space observations from GNSS, ionosondes, and several satellite missions (COSMIC-2, GOLD, Swarm). We have investigated the ionospheric response to the 23–24 April 2023 severe geomagnetic storm and have shown the formation of super plasma bubbles expanding from equatorial latitudes to middle latitudes in the European/African sector during the main phase of the storm. Formation of these super bubbles was associated with storm-induced prompt penetration electric fields. We found that the area affected by the formation of numerous plasma bubbles covered more than 5000 km ranging from 30°W to 30°E in the Atlantic/African sector. The bubbles also had an impressive north-south extension, reaching as far poleward as ~30°–35° latitude in both hemispheres. After 20 UT on 23 April 2023, the zone with equatorial ionospheric irregularities reached Northern Africa, the Iberian Peninsula (Spain, Portugal) and the Mediterranean Sea in southern Europe, including areas of the Canary Islands (Spain) and the Azores and Madeira Islands (Portugal) in the Atlantic Ocean. The ionospheric irregularities persisted for 5–6 hours and began to fade after ~01 UT on 24 April 2023. COSMIC-2 scintillation measurements showed intense amplitude scintillations (S4 above 0.8) across this entire region, indicating presence of small-scale ionospheric irregularities inside the extended plasma bubbles. During this storm, EGNOS (European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service) experienced degraded performance, with significant navigation errors recorded at its southernmost stations in Northern Africa, Spain, Portugal, and their territories, which were affected by super plasma bubbles. This paper presents conclusive observational evidence showing development of the super plasma bubbles significantly expanding into the southern Europe and northern Africa region under geomagnetically disturbed conditions in April 2023.
Q2

The state of mid-latitude thermosphere retrieved from ionosonde and Swarm satellite observations during geomagnetic storms in February 2022
Perrone L., Mikhailov A.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
On 3 February 2022 49 SpaceX Starlink satellites were launched at the orbits with altitudes between 210 and 320 km and 38 of them were lost due to enhanced neutral density associated with two moderate geomagnetic storms. To investigate the impact of these geomagnetic storms on the Thermosphere-Ionosphere system F-layer Ne(h) profiles from ground-based ionosondes, located in different longitudinal sectors of both Hemispheres, and Swarm-C neutral density observations were analysed using an original method, THERION. Day-time mid-latitude thermosphere has manifested very moderate < 50% neutral density perturbations at 250 km height. The largest perturbations of thermospheric and related ionospheric parameters took place in American and Australian ‘near-pole’ longitudinal sectors. The largest (30-50)% atomic oxygen [O] increase took place in the Northern winter Hemisphere where [O] provided the main contribution to the neutral density ρ250 increase. On the contrary, [O] manifested a strong down to -(20-40)% storm depression in the summer Hemisphere and ρ250 increase was due to molecular nitrogen [N2] increase related to elevated neutral temperature Tex. Downwelling of [O] and the increase of [N2] due to elevated Tex work in parallel in the Northern winter Hemisphere resulting in (35-45)% increase of ρ250. On the contrary, [O] and [N2] work in opposite directions compensating to a great extent the contribution of each other to ρ250 in the Southern summer Hemisphere. The European longitudinal sector manifested same features as ‘near-pole’ ones but with less magnitude, so a (16-35)% storm-time increase of ρ250 in the winter European sector was mainly due to the [O] increase. The ‘far-from-pole’ winter Japanese sector manifested very moderate < 21% neutral density perturbations mainly related to Tex increase. The obtained results have shown a moderate impact on the Thermosphere-Ionosphere system produced by two geomagnetic storms in February 2022 but this impact was sufficient to result in loss of 38 satellites highlighting a necessity to conduct the routine monitoring of the thermosphere.
Q2

Real-time dose prediction for Artemis missions
Hu S., Barzilla J.E., Núñez M., Semones E.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
As large solar energetic particle (SEP) events can add significant radiation dose to astronauts in a short period of time and even induce acute clinical responses during missions, they present a concern for manned space flight operation. To assist the operations team in modeling and monitoring organ doses and any possible acute radiation-induced risks to astronauts during SEP events in real time, ARRT (Acute Radiation Risks Tool) 1.0 has been developed and successfully tested for Artemis I mission. The ARRT 2.0 described in this work integrates an established SEP forecasting model – UMASEP-100, further enabling real-time dose prediction for the upcoming Artemis II and following missions. With the new module linking with UMASEP-100 outputs in real time, the total BFO doses of most significant events can be communicated at the time of onset and hours before the peak. This is based on a flux-dose formula identified from comparing UMASEP-100 results with transport calculation for the events during 1994-2013 and validated with events outside that period. ARRT 2.0 also shows capability to distinguish minor events from significant ones to screen false alarms that will cause disruptions for space activities. This improvement provides additional information for operational teams to make timely decisions in contingent scenarios of severe SEP events to mitigate radiation exposure.
Q2

Estimation of the drift velocity of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles using GNSS and digisonde data
Navas-Portella V., Altadill D., Blanch E., Altadill M., Segarra A., de Paula V., Camilo Timoté C., Miguel Juan J.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (EPBs) play a crucial role in modulating plasma density and electron content within the equatorial ionosphere. In this work, we present an advanced and more robust version of the method developed by Blanch E et al. (2018, J Space Weather Space Clim., 8, 38–32) for detecting EPBs using data from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). The enhancements introduced in this version significantly improve the EPB detection process, achieving a notable reduction in the false positive rate compared to the previous approach. These refinements include the application of more rigorous statistical techniques to achieve a more accurate fit for the background Total Electron Content (TEC), leading to better characterization of EPBs through improved estimation of disturbance shapes. Applying the capabilities of this new method in a dense network of GNSS sensors, we have developed an interferometric procedure for estimating EPB drift velocities, including both speed and direction. This procedure provides valuable insights into the dynamic behavior of EPBs in the Caribbean region during 2014. Our analysis reveals a predominant eastward propagation pattern of EPBs, closely aligned with modified dip isolines. Furthermore, by integrating the results from the GNSS-based method with quasi co-located digisondes, we applied a conceptual model to estimate EPB velocities along their drift direction. This model has been tested across different geographical sectors and validated through comparisons with results from other independent studies. This cross-verification confirms the reliability of the methods for capturing EPB characteristics. This approach improves the precision of EPB detection and contributes to a deeper understanding of their spatiotemporal dynamics and behavior, providing a valuable framework for characterizing these phenomena in the equatorial ionosphere.
Q2

Towards advanced forecasting of solar energetic particle events with the PARASOL model
Afanasiev A., Wijsen N., Vainio R.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Gradual solar energetic particle (SEP) events are generally attributed to the particle acceleration in shock waves driven by coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Space-weather effects of such events are important, so there has been continuous effort to develop models able to forecast their various characteristics. Here we present the first version of a new such model with the primary goal to address energetic storm particle (ESP) events. The model, PARASOL, is built upon the PArticle Radiation Asset Directed at Interplanetary Space Exploration (PARADISE) test-particle simulation model of SEP transport, but includes a semi-analytical description of an inner (i.e., near the shock) part of the foreshock region. The semi-analytical foreshock description is constructed using simulations with the SOLar Particle Acceleration in Coronal Shocks (SOLPACS) model, which simulates proton acceleration self-consistently coupled with Alfvén wave generation upstream of the shock, and subsequent fitting of the simulation results with suitable analytical functions. PARASOL requires input of solar wind and shock magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) parameters. We evaluate the performance of PARASOL by simulating the 12 July 2012 SEP event, using the EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA) MHD simulation of the solar wind and CME in this event. The PARASOL simulation has reproduced the observed ESP event (E ≲ 5 MeV) in the close vicinity of the shock within one order of magnitude in intensity.
Q2

Investigating the drivers of long-term trends in the upper atmosphere over Rome across four decades
Spogli L., Sabbagh D., Perrone L., Scotto C., Cesaroni C.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
The nature of the long-term changes in the upper atmosphere morphology at mid-latitude remains a subject of debate, particularly regarding whether these changes are purely driven by geomagnetic and solar activities or whether forcing from the lower atmosphere, such as CO2 variations, may play a role. To contribute to this debate, we investigate the nature of the long-term trends of the ionospheric and thermospheric parameters by leveraging on ionosonde data digitally recorded at the Rome Observatory since 1976. The following parameters have been investigated under sunlit conditions (12:00 Local Time): critical frequency of the F1 layer (foF1); critical frequency of the F2 layer (foF2), atomic oxygen concentration at 300 km ([O]); ratio between atomic oxygen and molecular nitrogen concentrations at 300 km altitude ([O]/[N2]); exospheric temperature (Tex); thermospheric density at 300 km (ρ). The ionospheric parameters are manually scaled from digital ionograms, whereas thermospheric parameters are retrieved using the THERmospheric parameters from IONosonde observations (THERION) method, which utilises ionosonde observations and a physical model of the ionospheric F region. To investigate the influence of the solar and geomagnetic activity on long term variations, we consider the solar radio flux at 10.7 cm (F10.7) and the geomagnetic disturbance index Ap. To identify the various frequency/period components of the time series under consideration and identify the trends, we leverage the high scale/time resolution offered by the Fast Iterative Filtering (FIF) algorithm. A regression analysis of thermosphere/ionosphere parameters against geomagnetic/solar activity indices has then been conducted to investigate the drivers of long-term variability. Our findings reveal that the identified trends are predominantly controlled by external drivers, particularly long-term solar and geomagnetic activity variations.. The adopted methodology, based on regression modelling, demonstrates that variability in F10.7 and Ap accounts for nearly all of the observed changes, with the exception of atomic oxygen ([O]), which displays a slightly higher unexplained variability (~7%). The inclusion of CO2 concentration as an additional driver improves the regression model for [O]. However, the effect remains statistically limited, indicating that the impact of CO2 on thermospheric cooling might be of little significance. Further studies with extended time series are necessary to better quantify this relationship and evaluate its importance. These results highlight the predominant influence of solar and geomagnetic activity in determining upper atmosphere long-term trends at mid-latitudes.
Q2

Medium-Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Created by Primary Gravity Waves Generated by a Winter Storm.
Kogure M., Chou M., Yue J., Otsuka Y., Liu H., Sassi F., Pedatella N., Randall C.E., Harvey L.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
This study explores the meteorological source and vertical propagation of gravity waves (GWs) that drive daytime traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs), using the specified dynamics version of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with thermosphere-ionosphere eXtension (SD-WACCM-X) and the Sami3 is Also a Model of the Ionosphere (SAMI3) simulations driven by SD-WACCM-X neutral wind and composition. A cold weather front moved over the northern-central U.S.A. (90-100W, 35-45N) during the daytime of 20 October 2020, with strong upward airflow. GWs with ~500-700 km horizontal wavelengths propagated southward and northward in the thermosphere over the north-central U.S.A. Also, the perturbations were coherent from the surface to the thermosphere; therefore, the GWs were likely generated by vertical acceleration associated with the cold front over Minnesota and South Dakota. The convectively generated GWs had almost infinite vertical wavelength below ~100 km due to being evanescent. This implies that the GWs tunneled through their evanescent region in the middle atmosphere (where a squared vertical wavenumber is equal to/smaller than 0) and became freely propagating in the thermosphere and ionosphere. Medium-scale TIDs (MSTIDs) also propagated southward with the GWs, suggesting that the convectively generated GWs created MSTIDs.
Q2

TSI modeling: A comparison of ground-based Ca II K-line data with space-based UV images from the SDO/AIA instrument
Chapman G., Cookson A.M., Choudhary D.P.
Q2
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
We explore the use of space-based UV images as a substitute for ground-based Ca II K-line images in modeling Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) variability. The sunspot signal for all 2-component models used here is determined from SFO red continuum images at 672.3 nm. The facular signal is determined from either Ca II K-line images at 393.4 nm or space-based UV images from the Solar Dynamics Observatory AIA experiment at 160 nm and 170 nm wavelengths. Images at both AIA wavelengths are processed with the standard SFO algorithms. The results show good agreement between the fits to Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) variations using ground-based Ca K-line images and the fits to space-based UV images. However, AIA 170 nm images were superior to 160 nm images. The best 2-component fit using ground-based Ca II K-line data was R2 = 0.873; AIA 170 nm produced R2 = 0.896, better than AIA 160 nm’s R2 = 0.793.
Top-100
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
Pedagogies
150 citations, 3.77%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation
63 citations, 1.58%
|
|
Teaching and Teacher Education
54 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy
44 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Linguistics and Education
43 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Education Sciences
38 citations, 0.95%
|
|
English Teaching
37 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Journal of Literacy Research
33 citations, 0.83%
|
|
System
31 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Literacy
30 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Reading Research Quarterly
29 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education
29 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Language and Education
26 citations, 0.65%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Research
25 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Educational Linguistics
25 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Literacy Research and Instruction
23 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Reading Teacher
22 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Frontiers in Education
21 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Review of Research in Education
21 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Australian Journal of Language and Literacy
20 citations, 0.5%
|
|
TESOL Quarterly
19 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
19 citations, 0.48%
|
|
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
19 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
18 citations, 0.45%
|
|
E-Learning
18 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Thinking Skills and Creativity
18 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Cases on Instructional Technology in Gifted and Talented Education
18 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Language, Identity and Education
17 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy
16 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Discourse
16 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Educational Studies in Mathematics
15 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Learning, Media and Technology
15 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Innovative Digital Practices and Globalization in Higher Education
15 citations, 0.38%
|
|
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
14 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Foreign Language Annals
14 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Education
14 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Teacher Education
14 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Urban Education
14 citations, 0.35%
|
|
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Review of Educational Research
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
International Journal of Science Education
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Technology, Pedagogy and Education
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Cogent Education
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Computers and Education
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Written Communication
12 citations, 0.3%
|
|
TESOL Journal
12 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Mathematics Education Research Journal
12 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Australian Educational Researcher
12 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Language and Intercultural Communication
12 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education
12 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Language Teaching Research
11 citations, 0.28%
|
|
SAGE Open
11 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Theory and Research in Social Education
11 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice
11 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Computer Assisted Language Learning
10 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
10 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Curriculum Inquiry
10 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Teaching in Higher Education
10 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Pedagogy, Culture and Society
10 citations, 0.25%
|
|
British Journal of Sociology of Education
10 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Second Language Writing
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Equity and Excellence in Education
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Language Teaching
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Curriculum Studies
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Modern Language Journal
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Language, Culture and Curriculum
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Assessing Writing
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Sustainability
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of the Learning Sciences
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
New Educator
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Educational Technology Research and Development
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Inclusive Education
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Advances in Multimedia and Interactive Technologies
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Anthropology and Education Quarterly
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Mind, Culture, and Activity
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Curriculum Journal
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Mathematical Thinking and Learning
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Theory into Practice
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Research Papers in Education
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Cultural Studies of Science Education
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Multilingual Research Journal
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
The Urban Review
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Education 3-13
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Review of Education
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Visual Literacy
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Optimizing Online English Language Learning and Teaching
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Computers and Composition
7 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Action in Teacher Education
7 citations, 0.18%
|
|
ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education
7 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1099 citations, 27.59%
|
|
Springer Nature
454 citations, 11.4%
|
|
Elsevier
370 citations, 9.29%
|
|
SAGE
357 citations, 8.96%
|
|
Wiley
339 citations, 8.51%
|
|
IGI Global
210 citations, 5.27%
|
|
Emerald
99 citations, 2.48%
|
|
MDPI
72 citations, 1.81%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
60 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
60 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
49 citations, 1.23%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
31 citations, 0.78%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
29 citations, 0.73%
|
|
SciELO
27 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Australian Reading Association
20 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
19 citations, 0.48%
|
|
IOP Publishing
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
13 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
12 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
11 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
10 citations, 0.25%
|
|
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
9 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Oxford University Press
8 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
6 citations, 0.15%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
6 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
6 citations, 0.15%
|
|
AOSIS
6 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AIP Publishing
5 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
5 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
5 citations, 0.13%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
5 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IntechOpen
5 citations, 0.13%
|
|
National Documentation Centre (EKT)
5 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
4 citations, 0.1%
|
|
OpenEdition
4 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
4 citations, 0.1%
|
|
EDP Sciences
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
BOLEMA Departamento de Matematica
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Intellect
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Modestum Ltd
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Brill
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Duke University Press
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Anadolu University, Faculty of Communication Sciences
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Florida Gulf Coast University
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Berghahn Books
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Peeters Publishers
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Society for the Study of the Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Early Childhood Australia
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Institut National de Recherche Pedagogique
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Academy of Management
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Eyup Artvinli, Institute of Education in Eskisehir Osmangazi University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
School of Education, University of Louisiana at Monroe
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul,Faculdade de Educacao
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Council for Research in Music Education, School of Music, University of Illinois
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Unisa Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Moscow Polytechnic University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Academic Journals
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
S. Karger AG
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Infra-M Academic Publishing House
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Cifra Ltd - Russian Agency for Digital Standardization (RADS)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
State Public Scientific Technological Library SB RAS
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
CAIRN
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Human Kinetics
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
SLACK
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Cogitatio
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (62 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
31 publications, 5.67%
|
|
Brock University
11 publications, 2.01%
|
|
Michigan State University
10 publications, 1.83%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
10 publications, 1.83%
|
|
Arizona State University
9 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
9 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
8 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Griffith University
7 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of South Australia
7 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Melbourne
6 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
6 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
6 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
5 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Ohio State University
5 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
5 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
5 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
5 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Victoria
5 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Texas A&M University
5 publications, 0.91%
|
|
National University of Singapore
4 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Queensland
4 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
4 publications, 0.73%
|
|
St. Francis Xavier University
4 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of British Columbia
4 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Toronto
4 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Calgary
4 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
4 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
4 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Lisbon
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Western Sydney University
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Oslo
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
King's College London
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Sydney
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Murdoch University
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Stanford University
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Arizona
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Illinois State University
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Georgia State University
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Eastern Michigan University
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Minnesota
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Sheffield
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
3 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Taif University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Gazi University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Cyprus
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Open University of Cyprus
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Shaanxi Normal University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Iowa State University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Massey University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Curtin University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Southern Queensland
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Washington State University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
George Mason University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Washington
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
San Francisco State University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National University of La Plata
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Hiroshima University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Western University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Alberta
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Manitoba
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Castilla-La Mancha
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Florida
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Louisiana State University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Appalachian State University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Delaware
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Texas Tech University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of North Texas
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Alabama
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Texas State University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Bath
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
1 publication, 0.18%
|
|
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
1 publication, 0.18%
|
|
Kharazmi University
1 publication, 0.18%
|
|
Sakarya University
1 publication, 0.18%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
14 publications, 8.64%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
4 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Murdoch University
3 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Arizona State University
3 publications, 1.85%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
3 publications, 1.85%
|
|
St. Francis Xavier University
3 publications, 1.85%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
3 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Gazi University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Michigan State University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Curtin University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Illinois State University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Minnesota
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Hiroshima University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Calgary
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Florida
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Texas Tech University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Texas State University
2 publications, 1.23%
|
|
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Taif University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Sakarya University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Cukurova University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Hakim Sabzevari University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Pamukkale University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Giresun University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Anadolu University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Monash University Malaysia
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Northern University of Malaysia
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Hubei University of Technology
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Western Sydney University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Sultan Qaboos University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Oulu
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Anhui Normal University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Cairo University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of South-Eastern Norway
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Xianyang Normal University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Tasmania
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Southern Queensland
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Georgetown University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Cape Peninsula University of Technology
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Washington State University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Western Washington University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Phayao
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Auburn University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Hong Kong Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Ewha Womans University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Oregon State University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
New York University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Arizona
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Anyang Normal University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Central Florida
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of South Florida
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Cape Coast
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
National University of La Plata
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Central Michigan University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Bishop's University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Minnesota Duluth
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Doshisha University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Ain Shams University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
USA
|
USA, 195, 35.65%
USA
195 publications, 35.65%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 55, 10.05%
Australia
55 publications, 10.05%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 46, 8.41%
Singapore
46 publications, 8.41%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 44, 8.04%
Canada
44 publications, 8.04%
|
China
|
China, 40, 7.31%
China
40 publications, 7.31%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 30, 5.48%
United Kingdom
30 publications, 5.48%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 10, 1.83%
Turkey
10 publications, 1.83%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 10, 1.83%
Japan
10 publications, 1.83%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 8, 1.46%
Iran
8 publications, 1.46%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 1.28%
Spain
7 publications, 1.28%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 6, 1.1%
Norway
6 publications, 1.1%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.91%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.91%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 4, 0.73%
Argentina
4 publications, 0.73%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 4, 0.73%
Cyprus
4 publications, 0.73%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 0.73%
New Zealand
4 publications, 0.73%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 0.73%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 0.73%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.55%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.55%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 0.55%
Italy
3 publications, 0.55%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.55%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.55%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 0.55%
Malaysia
3 publications, 0.55%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 0.55%
Finland
3 publications, 0.55%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 0.55%
Sweden
3 publications, 0.55%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 2, 0.37%
Germany
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 0.37%
Kazakhstan
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.37%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.37%
Israel
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.37%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.37%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.37%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.37%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.37%
Chile
2 publications, 0.37%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.18%
France
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.18%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.18%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.18%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.18%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.18%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.18%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.18%
India
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.18%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.18%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.18%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.18%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.18%
Oman
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.18%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.18%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.18%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.18%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.18%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.18%
|
Show all (17 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
USA
|
USA, 54, 33.33%
USA
54 publications, 33.33%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 16, 9.88%
Singapore
16 publications, 9.88%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 12, 7.41%
Canada
12 publications, 7.41%
|
China
|
China, 11, 6.79%
China
11 publications, 6.79%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 9, 5.56%
Turkey
9 publications, 5.56%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 7, 4.32%
Australia
7 publications, 4.32%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 3.09%
Japan
5 publications, 3.09%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 4, 2.47%
United Kingdom
4 publications, 2.47%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 2.47%
Iran
4 publications, 2.47%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 4, 2.47%
Norway
4 publications, 2.47%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 3, 1.85%
Spain
3 publications, 1.85%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 1.85%
Colombia
3 publications, 1.85%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 1.85%
Finland
3 publications, 1.85%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 1.23%
Portugal
2 publications, 1.23%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 1.23%
Argentina
2 publications, 1.23%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 1.23%
Egypt
2 publications, 1.23%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 1.23%
Israel
2 publications, 1.23%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 1.23%
Malaysia
2 publications, 1.23%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 1.23%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 1.23%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 1.23%
Philippines
2 publications, 1.23%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 0.62%
Germany
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.62%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.62%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.62%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.62%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.62%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.62%
India
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.62%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.62%
Italy
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.62%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.62%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.62%
Oman
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.62%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.62%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.62%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.62%
Chile
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.62%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.62%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.62%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Show all (7 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
1 profile journal article
Baildon Mark
39 publications,
232 citations
h-index: 8