Biodemography and Social Biology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
0.9
SJR
0.363
CiteScore
1.5
Categories
Anthropology
Demography
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Genetics
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1990, 2008-2025
journal names
Biodemography and Social Biology
BIODEMOGR SOC BIOL
Top-3 citing journals

PLoS ONE
(90 citations)

Biodemography and Social Biology
(80 citations)

Social Science and Medicine
(74 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(30 publications)

University of Michigan
(29 publications)

University of Colorado Boulder
(26 publications)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(6 publications)

University of Southern California
(6 publications)

University of Michigan
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 311
Q3

Validation and implementation of an intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay and workflow: practical advice for endocrine surgery centres
Staibano P., Ahmed B., Ivica J., Macri J., Au M., Zhang H., Pasternak J.D., Bhandari M., Kavsak P.
Abstract
Objectives
Intraoperative PTH (IOPTH) can be challenging to offer through central laboratories despite its clinical benefit. We describe the implementation of a central laboratory-based IOPTH assay and workflow in a tertiary care centre.
Methods
The Elecsys® PTH STAT assay was assessed in EDTA plasma on the Cobas® e411 analyzer. Assay validation included precision, linearity, coefficient of variation (CV), accuracy, stability, and dilution. Samples were transported to the central laboratory and resulted via telephone to the operating room. We describe a case series of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) who underwent parathyroid surgery using our described IOPTH workflow.
Results
Within- and between-day CV was ≤3.0 % for quality control material that ranged from 2.2–44.6 pmol/L. Passing–Bablok regression yielded a slight proportional negative bias between the two Cobas e411 instruments [Elecsys® PTH our centre=0.95 (95 % CI: 0.90–1.00) × Elecsys® PTH Toronto − 0.05 (95 % CI: −0.20 to 0.09) (n=22)], but high correlation (r=0.99) as compared to PTH measured on the Vitros® XT 7600 analyzer [Elecsys® PTH=0.91 (95 % CI: 0.73–1.1) × Vitros® PTH + 0.1 (95 % CI: −0.34 to 0.76), r=0.96 (n=40)]. The mean operating time across ten patients surgically cured for PHPT was 47.1 min (±9.1) and no patients required intraoperative frozen tissue analysis.
Conclusions
The Elecsys® PTH STAT assay demonstrated acceptable analytical performance, and the described IOPTH workflow was implemented successfully via a collaborative hospital-wide initiative. We discuss our model to help guide other institutions in implementing and improving IOPTH workflows.
Q3

The impact of mutational burden, spliceosome and epigenetic regulator mutations on transfusion dependency in dysplastic neoplasms
Strasser B., Mustafa S., Steindl R., Heibl S., Mandl J., Lirk G., Haushofer A.
Abstract
Objectives
Myelodysplastic neoplasms and dysplastic chronic myelomonocytic leukemia are characterized by cytopenia. Therefore, transfusion dependency is high in these dysplastic neoplasms. We investigated the impact of molecular genetics on the transfusion dependency in dysplastic neoplasms.
Methods
We investigated the impact of the myeloid mutation burden on transfusion dependency in myelodysplastic neoplasms and dysplastic chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. In addition, the effect of different functional genetic groups, such as spliceosomes and epigenetic regulator gene mutations, on transfusion dependency was assessed in these patients. Confounding transfusion triggers were ruled out by the patient selection criteria and regression analyses.
Results
A greater number of mutations lead to a higher transfusion dependency for red blood cells and platelet concentrates. A higher transfusion dependency was associated with a higher transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Spliceosome mutations were associated with a higher transfusion dependency of red blood cell concentrates than epigenetic regulator mutations.
Conclusions
Molecular genetics has the potential to improve the precision of patient blood management in dysplastic neoplasms.
Q3

Congress report: 6th German POCT symposium, September 25–26, 2024, Bremen
Luppa P.B., Petersmann A.
Q3

A comparative study between the Chrono-log 700 and the Sysmex CS-2100i analyzers for assessing ristocetin cofactor activity in patients with von Willebrand disease
Boulassel M., Abdellatif H., Al-Falahi K., Al-Hashmi F., Bouchareb Y., Al-Abri B., Al-Jahdhami H.
Abstract
Objectives
A variety of methods are currently used to measure von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity, but still the VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assay using the manual aggregometry technique is the reference method, even having high inter-laboratory variability. The automated coagulation analyzers offer several advantages for routine testing. Herein the performance of the automated Sysmex CS2000/2100i analyzer was compared to the manual aggregometer Chrono-log 700 for assessing VWF:Co activity in patients suspected of having von Willebrand disease (VWD).
Methods
Plasma samples from 136 patients were prospectively collected, and blindly analyzed on both instruments, simultaneously. Linear regression analysis, Bland-Altman test, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and area under receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the performance of the automated VWF:RCo assay.
Results
There was a strong positive correlation between the two assays (r=0.86, p<0.0001) with an excellent reliability ICC value of 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.74–0.86). A very good degree of agreement between the two assays was also evidenced with an estimated bias of −0.055 (−0.58 to 0.46). The ROC curve for the automated VWF:RCo assay was 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.78–0.92; p<0.0001). Using a cut-off value of 0.44 UI/mL for VWF:RCo activity, the sensitivity and specificity values were 91.2 %, and 88.2 % for the automated assay. The positive and negative positive values for VWD detection were 72.9 %, and 96.7 %, respectively.
Conclusions
Collectively, these findings indicate that the automated VWF:RCo assay yields comparable results to the manual aggregometry assay, with very good accuracy and precision to help diagnose patients suspected with VWD.
Q3

Platelet clump assessment using the Cellavision peripherical blood application – do we need manual microscopy?
Janel A.
Abstract
Objectives
This study aims to investigate the frequency, detection, and distribution of platelet clumps, assess the performance of automated digital microscopy (Cellavision) for detecting platelet clumps and explore strategies to optimize detection efficiency.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 987,586 hemograms to evaluate the frequency of platelet clumps, and a study of 246 hemograms with platelet clumps for manual and digital microscopic reviews of blood smears. We investigated the locations and sizes of these clumps along the smear, and evaluated the detection capacity of the Cellavision system.
Results
Platelet clumps were found in 0.29 % of cases, with a higher incidence in pediatric and elderly populations. Platelet clumps were more frequent and larger at the smear periphery. Cellavision achieved 93 % sensitivity when combining the leukocyte and red blood cell observation fields. The strategy of reviewing only selected cases (platelet count <50 × 109/L or history of clumps) detected 97 % of platelet clumps, while reducing manual reviews by fourfold.
Conclusions
Automated digital microscopy is an effective tool for detecting platelet clumps, but it requires manual review in specific cases. Expanding image acquisition to the feather edge could further improve detection. A combined approach maximizes efficiency and ensures diagnostic accuracy, particularly in critical cases with low platelet counts.
Q3

Serum soluble endorphin combined with BISAP score predicts severe acute pancreatitis combined with septic shock
Yuan J., Yang Q., Chen C.
Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the diagnostic value of serum soluble endorphin (sENG) combined with BISAP score for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) complicated with septic shock.
Methods
A total of 150 cases of SAP complicated with sepsis were selected and categorized into the group with shock (n=88) and the group without shock (n=42). The general clinical data and laboratory indexes of the two groups were compared. The factors affecting the occurrence of septic shock were explored, and the correlation between serum sENG, BISAP, APACHEII, and SOFA scores was analyzed. The value of sENG and BISAP scores for diagnosis of SAP complicated with sepsis was assessed.
Results
APACHEII score, SOFA score, BISAP score, and serum sENG levels were higher in the group that developed septic shock. Increased BISAP score and elevated serum sENG level were independent risk factors for septic shock in patients with SAP. sENG level was positively correlated with BISAP score, APACHEII, and SOFA score in patients with SAP-complicated sepsis, and BISAP score was also positively correlated with APACHEII and SOFA score. sENG level and BISAP score had a predictive value for patients with SAP complicated with septic shock (AUC=0.723, 0.703), and the combination of the two had the highest value for the diagnosis of SAP complicated with septic shock (AUC=0.838). In addition, the AUC values of the two in predicting poor prognostic outcomes in patients with SAP complicated with sepsis were 0.757 and 0.706, respectively, and the AUC of the combination was 0.796.
Conclusions
Serum sENG and BISAP scores are predictors of septic shock in patients with SAP, and the combination of the two has a more powerful predictive effect and better evaluation significance.
Q3

Q3

Upregulation of hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 in peripheral blood monocytes is associated with coronary heart disease
Li S., Shi M., Gele T., Zhang A., Li W., Sun Y., Wang C., Zhao J., Pei L., Liu J., Jia M.
Abstract
Objectives
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are known to be associated with cardiovascular diseases. At present, an ideal biomarker for the early diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD) is still lacking.
Methods
We screened differentially expressed circRNAs (DEcircRNAs) in the peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) of patients with CHD, using the microarray technology in comparing the transcriptome. We identified upregulated and downregulated circRNAs. At the same time, we collected the patient clinical medical records and the PBMCs, the above results were analyzed and validated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), using 374 patients.
Results
We identified 183 upregulated and 41 downregulated circRNAs. Among these DEcircRNAs, hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 was significantly upregulated in a cohort of 297 patients with CHD and 77 non-CHD controls. Among patients with CHD, hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 was significantly upregulated in the unstable angina pectoris (UAP) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) subgroups compared to the stable angina pectoris (SAP) subgroup. By dividing hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 expression into quartiles, we observed that the highest hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 expression quartile was a risk factor for CHD compared to the lowest quartile (odds ratio [OR]: 2.709; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.126–6.519, p=0.026), after adjusting for the traditional risk factors (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], smoking, alcohol, C-reactive protein [CRP], small and dense low-density lipoprotein [sdLDL] and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 [LP-PLA2]).
Conclusions
These data suggest that upregulated hsa_circ_0000745/hsa_circRNA_101996 in PBMCs is a risk factor for CHD and could be used as a biomarker of CHD.
Q3

The trend of Epstein-Barr virus DNA loads and CD8+ T lymphocyte numbers can predict the prognosis of pediatric liver transplant recipients with PTLD
Wang K., Xu D., Gao Y., Ma K., Zhao W.
Abstract
Objectives
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can cause lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in immunodeficiency individuals. The pathogenesis of EBV infection depends on its effective recognition and elimination. Our study investigated the effect of peripheral lymphocyte subsets (PLS) on the elimination of EBV.
Methods
A retrospective single-center study included 63 patients with 17 pediatric liver transplant recipients with EBV-induced PTLD (PTLD group) and 46 patients diagnosed with EBV-induced mononucleosis (IM group). Dynamic monitoring of PLS with EBV-DNA loads was performed.
Results
EBV-DNA replicated at a high level (5.2E3∼5.93E7 copies/mL in PBMC) before treatment in all patients in PTLD group. B lymphocytes were the main infected cells. After treatment with Rituximab, the EBV-DNA loads decreased below the lower limit of detection in 10 patients (PTLD-stable disease, PTLD-SD group), and the viral loads replicated at lower level in six patients (PTLD-partial response, PTLD-PR group). In the PTLD-SD group, the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes increased beyond the normal range with the ascending of EBV-DNA loads, then it decreased to the normal range accompanied by the clearance of EBV. In the PTLD-PR group, the CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes kept in the normal range, while the EBV kept on replication.
Conclusions
The increased number of CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes occurred in parallel with the decline in EBV-DNA loads, which is the most useful index in estimating the host capacity of immuno-surveillance against EBV.
Q3

Evaluation of different needle gauge blood collection sets (23G/25G) in aged patients
Rosada A., Friedrich K., Spieß E., Prpic M., Müller-Werdan U., Jahić A., Kappert K.
Abstract
Objectives
Aged patients are often characterized by difficult blood sampling conditions. Smaller needle gauge (G) may be beneficial for venous access and reduced pain perception, however, potentially at the expense of lower blood quality for laboratory measurements. We systematically compared two blood collection sets with different outer but equal inner diameters; different needle tips, and retract mechanisms in aged patients (Safety-Lok™, 23G, SL vs. UltraTouch™ Push Button, 25G, UT-PB) regarding clinical aspects and laboratory measurements.
Methods
Clinical examination and questionnaires were used in an aged cohort (n=161, average age=81.6 years), to determine characteristics of venipuncture, the phlebotomist’s assessment of blood draw including level of difficulty, and patient’s pain perception with either one or both blood collection sets. Sample quality was evaluated by laboratory analytics considering 13 parameters.
Results
SL, UT-PB, or both were used in 89 (55 %), 72 (45 %) or 36 (22 %) patients. The handling of the blood collection sets was perceived slightly easier for UT-PB compared to SL by the phlebotomist (−30 %, p=0.038). There was no significant difference in other parameters of the phlebotomist’s assessment or patients’ perception of blood collection. There was no clinically relevant difference between both sets in any of the laboratory measurements, including potassium and hemolysis index.
Conclusions
Clinical use of the UT-PB compared with SL in aged patients was associated with slight advantages of UT-PB, e.g. in the handling comfort for the phlebotomist. Sample quality, especially regarding hemolysis, was identical between both blood collecting sets, making its use uncritical in difficult venous conditions commonly seen in elderly patients.
Q3

Comparison between detection power of MBT STAR-Carba test and KBM CIM Tris II for carbapenemase-producing bacteria
Komatsu S., Fujinaga C., Nakanishi N.
Abstract
Objectives
The rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing bacteria is clinically important for selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry was used to detect carbapenemase activity.
Methods
In this study, we evaluated the detection power of MBT STAR-Carba test on identifying carbapenemase-producing bacteria isolated in Kobe city, Japan, compared with that of the KBM CIM Tris II kit using the modified procedure parameters. The obtained results were expressed as normalized logRQ values indicating a measure of hydrolysis efficiency.
Results
The MBT STAR-Carba test rapidly detected not only major carbapenemases, such as IMP-1 and IMP-6 that are most prevalent in Japan, but also GES-type and OXA-51-like carbapenemases, which are difficult to detect by reaction with inhibitors or KBM CIM Tris II by extending the incubation time.
Conclusions
The MBT STAR-Carba test will be beneficial in rapid identification of carbapenemases in clinical settings and environmental investigations.
Q3

Advances and challenges in platelet counting: evolving from traditional microscopy to modern flow cytometry
Chen Y., Hu Y., Hu H.
Abstract
Platelet counting is a fundamental clinical test for diagnosing haemorrhagic diseases, coagulation abnormalities, and certain autoimmune disorders, and it also serves as a critical basis for decisions regarding platelet transfusion. Common automated methods for platelet counting include the international harmonization protocol (IHP) based on flow cytometry, CD61 immunoplatelet count (CD61-imm), impedance platelet count (PLT-I), hybrid platelet count (PLT-H), optical platelet count (PLT-O), and fluorescence platelet count (PLT-F). The IHP, based on flow cytometry, is recommended as the reference measurement procedure (RMP) by the Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China, the International Council for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH), and the International Society of Laboratory Hematology (ISLH) due to its superior precision and accuracy. Despite the significant improvements in efficiency and standardization brought about by automation, traditional blood smear microscopic examination (PLT-M) remains indispensable in specific scenarios, such as low platelet counts or abnormal platelet morphology, to ensure the accuracy and reliability of platelet counting results from automated methods.
Q3

Q3

Clarithromycin crystalluria
Zhao W., Zhang T.
Q3

Revision of the “Guideline of the German Medical Association on Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratory Examinations – Rili-BAEK”
Ahmad-Nejad P., Bauersfeld W., Baum H., Behre H.M., Burkhardt R., Cassens U., Ceglarek U., Christmann M., Cremers J., Diedrich S., Döring S., Gässler N., Haase G., Haselmann V., Hofmann J., et. al.
Top-100
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
PLoS ONE
90 citations, 2.09%
|
|
Biodemography and Social Biology
80 citations, 1.86%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
74 citations, 1.72%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
70 citations, 1.63%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
61 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Demographic Research
54 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Scientific Reports
51 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Demography
45 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
41 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Psychoneuroendocrinology
40 citations, 0.93%
|
|
American Journal of Human Biology
40 citations, 0.93%
|
|
SSM - Population Health
37 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
35 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Population Research and Policy Review
35 citations, 0.81%
|
|
BMC Public Health
31 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Population Studies
30 citations, 0.7%
|
|
American Journal of Public Health
28 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
25 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Evolution and Human Behavior
24 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Personality and Individual Differences
23 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 citations, 0.51%
|
|
History of the Family
22 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Social Science Research
22 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Biosocial Science
21 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
21 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Economics and Human Biology
21 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Journal of Aging and Health
20 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Human Immunology
20 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
19 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Human Reproduction
19 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Nutrients
18 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Maternal and Child Health Journal
16 citations, 0.37%
|
|
BMJ Open
15 citations, 0.35%
|
|
American Journal of Epidemiology
15 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Cureus
15 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Behavior Genetics
14 citations, 0.33%
|
|
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
14 citations, 0.33%
|
|
American Journal of Men's Health
14 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Affective Disorders
14 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities
14 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Anthropological Review
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Human Nature
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
JAMA network open
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
International Journal of Epidemiology
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Archives of Sexual Behavior
12 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Intelligence
12 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Preventive Medicine
12 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
12 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Population and Development Review
12 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Evolutionary Psychological Science
12 citations, 0.28%
|
|
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
11 citations, 0.26%
|
|
European Journal of Population
11 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Marriage and Family
11 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Annals of Epidemiology
11 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Development and Psychopathology
11 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Twin Research and Human Genetics
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Religion and Health
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Family Issues
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Translational Psychiatry
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Advances in Life Course Research
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Pediatrics
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Aging
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Annual Review of Sociology
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Human Hypertension
8 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Psychological Medicine
8 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
8 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Population
8 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
8 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
8 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Psychosomatic Medicine
8 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Evolutionary Psychology
8 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Developmental Psychobiology
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Ageing Research Reviews
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Early Human Development
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Alzheimer's and Dementia
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Health Economics
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Studies in Family Planning
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Contraception
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Sociological Review
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Women's Health Issues
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Health Economics (United Kingdom)
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Genes
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Healthcare
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Population Research
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Political Psychology
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
The Gerontologist
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advances in Medical Sociology
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Culture, Health and Sexuality
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Women's Health
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
Elsevier
788 citations, 18.32%
|
|
Springer Nature
728 citations, 16.92%
|
|
Wiley
385 citations, 8.95%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
322 citations, 7.48%
|
|
SAGE
211 citations, 4.9%
|
|
Oxford University Press
201 citations, 4.67%
|
|
MDPI
155 citations, 3.6%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
111 citations, 2.58%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
102 citations, 2.37%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
98 citations, 2.28%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
77 citations, 1.79%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
67 citations, 1.56%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
57 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research/Max-Planck-institut fur Demografische Forschung
55 citations, 1.28%
|
|
BMJ
37 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
36 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Emerald
34 citations, 0.79%
|
|
American Public Health Association
28 citations, 0.65%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
25 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
22 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
21 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Annual Reviews
21 citations, 0.49%
|
|
The Royal Society
18 citations, 0.42%
|
|
S. Karger AG
15 citations, 0.35%
|
|
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
13 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Impact Journals
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
JMIR Publications
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
10 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
9 citations, 0.21%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
8 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
7 citations, 0.16%
|
|
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Economic Association
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SciELO
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
6 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Editions Odile Jacob
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Society for Sociological Science
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
F1000 Research
5 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Duke University Press
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
MIT Press
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
PeerJ
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Medknow
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
CAIRN
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
AOSIS
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Vydavatelstvi Karolinum
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
National Recreation and Park Association
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Endocrinology Research Centre
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
3 citations, 0.07%
|
|
World Scientific
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Physiological Society
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
King Saud University
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Wayne State University Press
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Medical Association
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American College of Physicians
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOP Publishing
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Societe Francaise de Sante Publique
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Royal College of Psychiatrists
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Aging and Disease
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Kamla Raj Enterprises
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Human Kinetics
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IGI Global
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
30 publications, 3.44%
|
|
University of Michigan
29 publications, 3.33%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
26 publications, 2.99%
|
|
University of Southern California
21 publications, 2.41%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
19 publications, 2.18%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
17 publications, 1.95%
|
|
Princeton University
14 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Harvard University
14 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Duke University
13 publications, 1.49%
|
|
University of Washington
13 publications, 1.49%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
13 publications, 1.49%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
13 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Florida State University
12 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
12 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Stanford University
11 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Arizona
10 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Utah
10 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
9 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Alberta
9 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Northwestern University
8 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Minnesota
8 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Brown University
8 publications, 0.92%
|
|
International Institute for Population Sciences
7 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Columbia University
7 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Brigham Young University
7 publications, 0.8%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
6 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Syracuse University
6 publications, 0.69%
|
|
New York University
6 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
6 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
6 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Michigan State University
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Cornell University
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Yale University
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Georgetown University
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Arizona State University
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Emory University
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Western University
5 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Andhra University
4 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Umeå University
4 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University College London
4 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Auckland
4 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
4 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Kansas State University
4 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Miami
4 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Louisville
4 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Indian Statistical Institute
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Cambridge
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Folkhalsan Research Centre
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Sassari
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Boston University
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
North Carolina State University
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Ohio State University
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Chicago
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Wayne State University
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Rajshahi
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
McGill University
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Vienna
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Victoria
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Florida
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Texas A&M University
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Huntsman Cancer Institute
3 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Shiraz University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Christian Medical College, Vellore
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Sri Venkateswara University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Australian National University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Shanghai University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
King's College London
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
National Taiwan University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Stony Brook University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Drexel University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Southampton
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Parma
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Gadjah Mada University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Western Washington University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Virginia Tech
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
DePaul University
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
2 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
University of Southern California
6 publications, 6.45%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 publications, 6.45%
|
|
University of Michigan
5 publications, 5.38%
|
|
University of Minnesota
4 publications, 4.3%
|
|
International Institute for Population Sciences
3 publications, 3.23%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
3 publications, 3.23%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 3.23%
|
|
University of Rajshahi
3 publications, 3.23%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
3 publications, 3.23%
|
|
University of Utah
3 publications, 3.23%
|
|
Shiraz University
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of New South Wales
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Syracuse University
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of Macau
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Federal University of Sergipe
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Emory University
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
East Carolina University
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
2 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Buketov Karagandy University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of the Punjab
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
International Islamic University, Islamabad
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Bahauddin Zakariya University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Lorestan University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Alzahra University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Acharya Nagarjuna University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University Malaysia, Terengganu
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Umeå University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Jönköping University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Shanghai University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Palermo
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Stony Brook University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Trento
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Parma
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Udine
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Iowa State University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Sassari
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Auckland
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Otago
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Charles University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Monash University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Berghofer Medical Research Institute
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Canberra
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Princeton University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Korea University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
North Carolina State University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Tufts University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Huzhou University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Seoul Women's University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Boston College
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Vienna
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Nova Southeastern University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Indiana University Southeast
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Texas Tech University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Texas Medical Branch
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
University of Houston–Clear Lake
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Arba Minch University
1 publication, 1.08%
|
|
Show all (63 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
USA
|
USA, 459, 52.7%
USA
459 publications, 52.7%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 36, 4.13%
Canada
36 publications, 4.13%
|
India
|
India, 29, 3.33%
India
29 publications, 3.33%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 28, 3.21%
United Kingdom
28 publications, 3.21%
|
China
|
China, 17, 1.95%
China
17 publications, 1.95%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 12, 1.38%
Italy
12 publications, 1.38%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 11, 1.26%
Germany
11 publications, 1.26%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 10, 1.15%
Australia
10 publications, 1.15%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 8, 0.92%
Mexico
8 publications, 0.92%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 8, 0.92%
Sweden
8 publications, 0.92%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 7, 0.8%
Bangladesh
7 publications, 0.8%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 7, 0.8%
Brazil
7 publications, 0.8%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 6, 0.69%
Netherlands
6 publications, 0.69%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 6, 0.69%
New Zealand
6 publications, 0.69%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 5, 0.57%
Israel
5 publications, 0.57%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 5, 0.57%
Iran
5 publications, 0.57%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 5, 0.57%
Spain
5 publications, 0.57%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.57%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.57%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 5, 0.57%
Finland
5 publications, 0.57%
|
France
|
France, 4, 0.46%
France
4 publications, 0.46%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.46%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.46%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.46%
Poland
4 publications, 0.46%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 0.46%
Japan
4 publications, 0.46%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.34%
Austria
3 publications, 0.34%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 3, 0.34%
Venezuela
3 publications, 0.34%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.34%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.34%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 0.34%
Pakistan
3 publications, 0.34%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 0.23%
Estonia
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.23%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.23%
Ghana
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.23%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.23%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.23%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.23%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.23%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.23%
Chile
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.23%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.23%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.23%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.23%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.23%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.11%
Russia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.11%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.11%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.11%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.11%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.11%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.11%
Norway
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.11%
Panama
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.11%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.11%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.11%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.11%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.11%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.11%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.11%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Show all (24 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
USA
|
USA, 45, 48.39%
USA
45 publications, 48.39%
|
China
|
China, 6, 6.45%
China
6 publications, 6.45%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 4.3%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 4.3%
|
India
|
India, 4, 4.3%
India
4 publications, 4.3%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 4, 4.3%
Italy
4 publications, 4.3%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 3.23%
Australia
3 publications, 3.23%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 3.23%
Iran
3 publications, 3.23%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 3.23%
Pakistan
3 publications, 3.23%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 3.23%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 3.23%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 3.23%
Sweden
3 publications, 3.23%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 3.23%
Japan
3 publications, 3.23%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 2.15%
Brazil
2 publications, 2.15%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 2.15%
New Zealand
2 publications, 2.15%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 2.15%
Chile
2 publications, 2.15%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 1.08%
Germany
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 1.08%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 1.08%
Austria
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 1.08%
Algeria
1 publication, 1.08%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1, 1.08%
United Kingdom
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 1.08%
Ghana
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 1.08%
Spain
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 1.08%
Malaysia
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 1.08%
Poland
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 1.08%
Turkey
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 1.08%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 1.08%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 1.08%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 1.08%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|