Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
7.3
SJR
1.763
CiteScore
15.1
Categories
Geography, Planning and Development
Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2001-2025
journal names
Tourism Review
TOUR REV
Top-3 citing journals

Tourism Review
(2526 citations)

Sustainability
(1259 citations)

Current Issues in Tourism
(660 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Hong Kong Polytechnic University
(23 publications)

University of Central Florida
(18 publications)

University of Innsbruck
(16 publications)

Hong Kong Polytechnic University
(14 publications)

Beijing International Studies University
(9 publications)

Sichuan University
(9 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 702
Q1

A review of silicosis and other silica-related diseases in the engineered stone countertop processing industry
Fazio J.C., Viragh K., Houlroyd J., Gandhi S.A.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
Q1

Exposure to disulfiram and incidence of parkinsonism
d’Errico A., Strippoli E., Goldman S.M., Blanc P.D.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Case reports implicate disulfiram treatment in causing parkinsonism, but these observations lack epidemiological confirmation. Aim of the present study was to estimate the risk of incident parkinsonism associated with disulfiram dispensing in a large Italian population.
Methods
In this observational cohort study, administrative data were used, linking records at the individual level from civic registries, population census, mortality registers, hospital admissions, archives of drug prescriptions, and direct ambulatory drug distribution. Participants included all residents in the Piedmont region of Italy aged ≥ 40 years participating in 2011 census, still resident and alive at the beginning of 2013, followed-up from 2013 to 2019. The outcome was incident parkinsonism identified through multiple prescriptions of levodopa or a hospital admission for Parkinson’s disease or atypical parkinsonism. Exposure to disulfiram and to neuroleptics was assessed through regional drug prescription archives. The association between disulfiram and parkinsonism onset was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for gender, age and neuroleptic use.
Results
The study population included 2,498,491 individuals (mean age: 62 years). During follow-up, 19,072 parkinsonism cases were identified, 8 of whom had been prescribed disulfiram. Exposure to disulfiram was associated with a three-fold increased risk of parkinsonism (HR = 3.10, 95% CI = 1.55–6.21) that remained significant when adjusted for neuroleptic use (HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.01–4.10). The association was stronger among persons unexposed to neuroleptics and among those with more than four disulfiram prescriptions.
Conclusions
These results support the hypothesis that disulfiram may cause parkinsonism. Clinicians and drug regulatory agencies should consider parkinsonism when assessing the risks and benefits of disulfiram use.
Q1

Cumulative risk assessment methodology applied to non-dietary exposures: developmental alterations in professional agricultural settings
Tosti L., Marazzini M., Kanadil M., Metruccio F.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The safety assessment of combined exposure to xenobiotics has been an emerging topic for several years. Methodologies and approaches for cumulative risk assessment (CRA) are being developed primarily for the dietary risk assessment of pesticides, thus focusing only on consumer exposure. However, as highlighted in recent years, non-dietary exposures, such as those encountered by professionals in agricultural settings, may pose a significant risk due to their higher levels compared to dietary exposure. Despite this, existing methodologies for cumulative risk assessment (CRA) have not adequately addressed this critical aspect. In the EU, even if several legislations highlight the need to address the non-dietary CRA, no legal requirements are in place yet, therefore, there are no harmonized methodologies and approaches currently available. In a first step to fill this gap, this study is aimed at exploring CRA methodology applied to non-dietary exposure to pesticide in agricultural settings, specifically targeting operators, re-entry workers, and bystanders. The primary objective of the study was to verify the feasibility of an electronic register of plant protection treatments as data source for identifying and characterizing in field mixtures and consequently estimating cumulative non-dietary systemic exposure in real life. The relevant active substances selected for this investigation were those listed in foetal craniofacial alterations cumulative assessment groups (CAGs), established by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for dietary CRA. Exposures to pesticides were estimated using European Union agreed mathematical models. The preliminary findings of this investigation effectively revealed the value of the register of treatments in assessing real-life plant protection products (PPP) usage in professional agricultural settings. In conclusion, the study provides encouraging insights into using the pesticide dietary CRA approach for non-dietary risk assessment in agricultural settings, underlining the necessity for further research and investigation of its feasibility for the evaluation of other acute effects but also for long-term effects related CAGs.
Q1

Herbicide-related health risks: key mechanisms and a guide to mitigation strategies
Hongoeb J., Tantimongcolwat T., Ayimbila F., Ruankham W., Phopin K.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
Q1

Toxic effects of chronic occupational mercury vapor exposure on female workers of childbearing age
Pan Y., Qu K., Li H., Song Y.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Few studies have been conducted on women of childbearing age with chronic mercury poisoning caused by mercury vapor exposure. Occupational exposure, clinical symptoms and signs, laboratory tests, auxiliary examinations, treatment, and follow-up of 31 female workers with chronic mercury poisoning from a mercury thermometer processing factory who received inpatient treatment at our hospital between September 2021 and August 2022 were analyzed. In 31 female workers of childbearing age (23–43 years) who were chronically exposed to mercury vapor (3–31 months), urinary mercury levels exceeded the normal range. The clinical manifestations were primarily neurological (96.77%). Renal pathology of the two female workers suggested membranous nephropathy in the first stage. Some female workers experienced menstrual abnormalities, anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders. Treatment was mainly chelation therapy supplemented with antioxidants and other symptomatic supportive treatments. All patients achieved good results after discontinuing exposure to mercury vapor and receiving treatment. However, follow-up after discharge revealed that some female workers still had insomnia. Occupational mercury vapor exposure is hazardous to female workers of childbearing age and increases the risk of adverse effects on their reproductive health. Occupational protection and prevention of mercury exposure in female workers of reproductive age must be emphasized.
Q1

Principles of occupational medicine: an educational case study of hazards and risks for Dr “Indiana” Jones
Erren T.C., Dietrich C., Wallraff J., Glenewinkel F., Pinger A., Lewis P.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Understanding the nature and consequences of hazards and risks in the workplace is critical to protecting people from harm. We review the fictional example of “Indiana” Jones as an educational vector to illustrate principles of occupational medicine in real-world scenarios. After reviewing the Jones saga regarding potential hazards (physical – biological – chemical – psychosocial), we provide a practical outlook on the workplace health for readers with a non-occupational medicine background.
Q1

Silicosis prevalence and related issues in India: a scoping review
Khetan M., Babu B.V.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Silicosis remains a major occupational health challenge in India. This review systematically examines the prevalence, risk factors, regional differences, and diagnostic tools specific to India’s high-risk industries. Additionally, it assesses policy gaps and offers insights from diverse clinical and qualitative studies, aiming to inform targeted public health interventions and support the development of effective occupational health policies. For this review, data were extracted for each study, including author, location, design, study aims, sample size and characteristics, participant age, duration of silica exposure, diagnostic criteria, and primary outcomes. As an add-on analysis included, a random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of silicosis and assess variability among studies. The review also included qualitative analyses on awareness, diagnostic tools (e.g., CC16 protein), and differences in prevalence across various occupational groups and regions within India. The review initially identified 263 articles, narrowed down to 49 eligible studies on silicosis in India after exclusions and quality assessment. Among these, 11 prevalence studies (total sample size: 2072) showed an average silicosis rate of 31.39%. Specific studies reported high rates, including 52% among Rajasthan mine workers and 69.1% among Khambhat agate workers. Additionally, screening tools, like CC16 protein levels, showed promise for early diagnosis, while qualitative studies highlighted gaps in awareness and regulatory practices. Meta-analysis revealed a significant pooled prevalence (25.98%) and marked variability (I2 = 98.86%), underscoring the need for targeted interventions and worker protections. This review of current knowledge on silicosis in India finds silicosis highly prevalent among workers in mining and stone industries, with gaps in regulatory enforcement and awareness. Biomarkers like CC16 offer the potential for early diagnosis, underscoring the need for preventive measures. Policy recommendations include stricter dust exposure limits, enhanced workers’ education, routine screening, and improved access to protective equipment and health monitoring to reduce the risk of silicosis and health disparities in vulnerable occupational groups.
Q1

Relationship between butyrylcholinesterase activity and hepatic transaminases: a cross-sectional study in agricultural workers from Peru
Ortiz-Delgado E., Bendezu-Quispe G., Soncco-Llulluy F., Li J., Rosales-Rimache J.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Chronic exposure to pesticides causes various adverse health effects, mainly at a neurological level. However, there is little evidence focused on liver tissue injury and transaminase activity as indicators of effect. A cross-sectional study was designed based on medical-occupational records of workers from an agro-export company in Peru to associate the levels of butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) transaminases (ALT and AST). Occupational medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic and occupational information and laboratory values of BChE activity and transaminases. We evaluated 459 records, and 69.9% were men. The mean age was 34.9 ± 11.5 years. BChE, ALT, and AST levels were 6238.8 ± 709.1 U/l, 34.4 ± 12.5 U/l, and 22.4 ± 8.5 U/l, respectively. The proportion of inhibited BCHE and elevated transaminase levels was 15.3% and 21.6%, respectively. We found a significant association between BChE inhibition and elevation of transaminases (AST: PR = 0.798, 95%CI: 0.716–0.889; ALT: PR = 0.419, 95%CI: 0.239–0.736). The potential usefulness of transaminases is shown as a biomarker of exposure and monitoring in occupational health programs for the agro-industry.
Q1

Impacts of hazardous noise levels on hearing loss and tinnitus in dental professionals
Zhang C., Young A., Rodriguez S., Schulze K.A., Surti B., Najem F., Hu J.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Hazardous noise exposure is an important health concern in many workplaces and is one of the most common work-related injuries in the United States. Dental professionals are frequently exposed to high levels of occupational noise in their daily work environment. This noise is generated by various dental handpieces such as drills, suctions, and ultrasonic scalers. Prolonged exposure to such noise levels is known to have adverse effects on hearing health. Despite the prevalence of occupational noise in dentistry, there is a paucity of research specifically examining the prevalence of hearing loss and tinnitus in dental professionals. To evaluate the prevalence of hearing loss and tinnitus, data were collected from 60 dental professionals, including participant demographics and audiometric thresholds. Thresholds were compared to the age- and sex-based reference ranges from the International Standards Organization (ISO 7029:2017). Results showed that 15–25% of males and 13–18% of females had hearing thresholds that exceeded 95th percentile limits based on the ISO normative age- and sex-distributions. Tinnitus was reported in 40% of the participants. This study is the first to examine the characteristics and prevalence of auditory dysfunctions in dental professionals compared to the ISO normative age and sex distributions of hearing status. Findings from this study highlight the need for increasing the awareness of occupational noise hazards among dental professionals and the importance of routine audiological monitoring.
Q1

Sowing seeds of awareness: a cross-sectional analysis of mental health literacy and help-seeking in Irish farmers
O’Connor S., O’Hagan A.D., Firnhaber J., O’Shaughnessy B.R., McNamara J., Breslin G., O’Keeffe S., Malone S.M.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Farmers around the world are at risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation yet many avoid seeking help. In Ireland, farmers’ mental health is a national concern, as farmers face barriers of masculine norms around help-seeking. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and relationship between mental health literacy and mental health help-seeking in the Irish farming community. It also aimed to identify if mental health literacy or mental health help-seeking differed depending on gender, age, education, health status and income level. We conducted a cross-sectional assessment of 351 Irish farmers’ mental health literacy and help-seeking using validated psychometric measures: the Mental Help Seeking Intention Scale (MHSIS), the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Short Form (ATSPPH-SF), and the Multicomponent Mental Health Literacy Measure (MMHL). Irish farmers’ mental health literacy and help-seeking scores were interrelated. Though low, farmers’ scores were comparable to the general population and higher than some European samples. Despite broadly favourable attitudes towards seeking professional mental health help, Irish farmers perceived significant barriers to accessing care and exhibited stoic health attitudes. Farmers with less education and men were particularly at risk. Irish farmers’ stoic attitudes may be a response to their perceived lack of services. Interventions providing mental health literacy education and improving access to existing mental health services are particularly important for this population of farmers.
Q1

Police officer occupational health: a model of organizational constraints, trauma exposure, perceived resources, and agency
Anders R., Frapsauce A., Sauvezon C., Gilibert D.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Police officers constitute a work force at high risk due to their highly demanding work conditions. In a realistic paradigm, these conditions, and other determinants of their psychological health, can be linked to a multitude of variables that interplay altogether. However, current literature that simultaneously models–quantitatively from observed data–such a multitude of variables is sparse. This study took upon this objective to further theoretical and applied understandings through a measurement framework on empirical data, and allow the data to drive some features of model development, such as variable groupings into factors, and paths between factors. A total of 1312 officers from various police bureaus fully responded to a questionnaire composed of validated instruments for assessing factors related to psychological and occupational health, consisting of more than 25 variables. Statistical analyses were performed in progressing complexity, namely t-tests, correlations, multiple regression, factor analysis, and path analysis with latent factors. The regression analysis identified 10 significant variables, in which decision latitude, organizational justice, and work recognition/meaning were the most protective, and these 10 variables coincided with those found significant in the t-test and correlational results. In higher complexity, the latent path analysis resulted in a model of 6 factors: Psychological Health, Organizational Constraints, Trauma Exposure, Perceived Resources, Sense of Agency, and Esteem. Organizational Constraints (β = -0.32, inferred by psychological demands and role conflict), Perceived Resources (β = 0.31, social support, a self/work-esteem subfactor, and organizational justice), Sense of Agency (β = 0.30, decision latitude, hierarchical position, right to carry a firearm), and Trauma Exposure (β = -0.14, frequency/time since event, used a firearm, years of service) were found significantly associated with Psychological Health. Within each factor, specific variables could be identified as the most associated, such as role conflict for constraints, self/work-esteem for resources, decision latitude for agency, and frequency of and time since trauma for trauma exposure. Our results therefore encourage us to take into account not only agency, but also past professional experiences in models for managing well-being. Providing police officers with social support at work, recognition, work meaning, fair proceedings and pay (organizational justice, especially for female and young officers), decision-making power (decision latitude), and minimizing conflictual information and procedures (role conflict) is of utmost importance. Officers with higher years of service, working in lower population cities, and who recently used their firearm, should be considered for trauma counseling. The degree of psychological demands of police officers should be regularly assessed, and reduced if possible. Reminders of support and integration in the force for officers with variables linked to a perceived lack of agency may be useful in their facing work challenges. Future integrative modeling research may be crucial to better understanding the relative contribution of each variable and their interplay in realistic settings, providing also a framework for measurement.
Q1

Pathological characterization of lung fibrosis in Sprague–Dawley rats treated with fluoro-edenite fibres by intrapleural injection
Tibaldi E., Gnudi F., Mandrioli D., Bruno C., Zona A., Fazzo L., Comba P.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
An increased incidence of pleural mesotheliomas in Biancavilla (Italy) was attributed to the environmental exposure to fluoro-edenite (FE). Results from the Ramazzini Institute (RI) in vivo long-term study confirmed the evidence that exposure to FE fibres is correlated with an increase of malignant pleural mesotheliomas in Sprague–Dawley rats. Recently asbestosis-like features were substantiated in Biancavilla residents without known occupational exposures. Aim of this work was to establish whether FE induce lung fibrosis with a pathogenetic mechanism similar to other asbestiform fibres. Original slides from the RI study were systematically re-examined to characterize the FE-induced lesions. Quantitative analysis of lung fibrosis was assessed following the Ashcroft method. Immunohistochemical analysis of protein involved in fibrotic responses and histochemical staining for FE-fibres identification were performed. Like asbestos, FE caused fibrotic lesions, pleural plaques or nodules and mesotheliomas. A significant increase of lung fibrosis (p < 0.001) was observed in the FE-treated groups compared to untreated controls. In the fibrotic responses to FE, vimentin was the most expressed protein, followed by collagen-I and alpha-SMA. Finally, ferruginous bodies, characterized by iron deposits and ferritin expression, were observed in FE-induced lesions. This study confirmed that FE exposure promotes the onset of fibrotic lesions at pleural level, as fibrous plaques or nodules and fibrosis, through a mechanism similar to other form of asbestos. These results combined with epidemiological study reported in Biancavilla residents, corroborate the need to promote health and epidemiological surveillance plans of respiratory diseases in population living in FE contaminated sites.
Q1

Retention of nickel, cobalt and chromium in skin at conditions mimicking intense hand hygiene practices using water, soap, and hand-disinfectant in vitro
Vilela L., Schenk L., Julander A., Midander K.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased hand hygiene practices using water, soap and hand disinfectants, became prevalent, particularly among frontline workers. This study investigates the impact of these practices on the skin’s ability to retain the allergenic metals nickel, cobalt, and chromium. The study constitutes three parts: (I) creating an impaired skin barrier, (II) exposing treated and untreated skin to nickel alone, and (III) in co-exposure with cobalt and chromium.
Methods
Using full-thickness skin from stillborn piglets, in vitro experiments were conducted to assess retention of metals in skin at conditions mimicking intense hand hygiene practices. Treatment of skin with varying concentrations of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), to impair its barrier integrity was assessed. This was followed by exposure of treated and untreated skin to the metals, that were dissolved in Milli-Q water, 0.5% SLS, and ethanol respectively.
Results
Results showed that pre-treatment with 5% SLS impaired the skin barrier with regards to the measure of trans epidermal water loss (TEWL). Metal amounts retained in the skin were generally higher in treated than untreated skin. The highest amounts of metal retained in skin were observed for exposure to nickel in ethanol. Co-exposure to nickel, cobalt, and chromium in 0.5% SLS resulted in the highest amounts of total metal retention.
Conclusions
The in vitro findings highlight the increased risk of metal retention in skin due to an impaired barrier. The SLS concentration used in the current study corresponds to those used in many hand hygiene products. Hence, occupational settings with frequent exposure to water, soap and disinfectants need to consider protective measures not only for the irritant exposures themselves but also simultaneous exposure to allergenic metals.
Q1

Long-term course and factors influencing work ability and return to work in post-COVID patients 12 months after inpatient rehabilitation
Müller K., Poppele I., Ottiger M., Wastlhuber A., Weber R., Stegbauer M., Schlesinger T.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in restoring work ability and facilitating the reintegration of post-COVID patients into the workforce. The impact of rehabilitation on work ability and return to work (RTW) of post-COVID patients remains poorly understood. This study was conducted to assess the work ability and RTW of post-COVID patients before rehabilitation and 12 months after rehabilitation and to identify physical and neuropsychological health factors influencing RTW 12 months after rehabilitation.
Methods
This longitudinal observational study included 114 post-COVID patients with work-related SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent inpatient post-COVID rehabilitation with indicative focus on pulmonology and/or psychotraumatology (interval between date of SARS-CoV-2 infection and start of rehabilitation: M = 412.90 days). Employment status, work ability, and the subjective prognosis of employment (SPE) scale were assessed before rehabilitation (T1) and 12 months after rehabilitation (T4). The predictors analysed at T4 were functional exercise capacity, physical activity, subjective physical and mental health status, fatigue, depression, and cognitive function. Longitudinal analyses were performed via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Logistic and linear regression analyses identified predictors of work ability and return to work (RTW), whereas mediation analyses examined the relationships between these predictors and work ability.
Results
At T4, the median of WAI total score indicated poor work ability, which significantly worsened over time (p < 0.001; r = 0.484). The SPE scale significantly increased from T1 to T4 (p = 0.022, r = -0.216). A total of 48.6% of patients had returned to work 12 months after rehabilitation. Fatigue was identified as the main predictor of reduced work ability and RTW, with each unit increase in fatigue severity decreasing the odds of RTW by 3.1%. In addition, physical capacity and subjective health status were significant predictors of perceived work ability.
Conclusions
The findings highlight the significant challenges that post-COVID patients face in regaining work ability and achieving successful RTW 12 months after rehabilitation. Fatigue appears to be an important predictor of work ability and RTW. To optimize recovery and enhance both biopsychosocial health and work ability, it is crucial to develop and implement personalised interventions that address fatigue, improve physical capacity, and support mental health.
Trial registration
This study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under DRKS00022928.
Q1

Associations between job demand-control-support and high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden: a cross-sectional study
Christiansen F., Gynning B.E., Lashari A., Zuberbühler J.P., Johansson G., Brulin E.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The knowledge about job demands, control, and support, and their potential associations with burnout risk among physicians in Sweden, is limited. This study aimed to explore (i) factors of the JobDemand-Control-Support (J-DCS) model across different groups of physicians in Sweden, (ii) their association with high burnout risk, and (iii) the potential buffering impact of job control and support.
Methods
Cross-sectional data from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Health in Healthcare Survey (LOHHCS) study cohort was used. In 2021, a total of 2032 respondents submitted questionnaire data comprising J-DCS measures (i.e., job demands, workplace control and task-level control, and social support from peers and managers). Burnout risk was measured using the Burnout Assessment Tool. Binary logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between the J-DCS variables and high burnout risk. Interaction analysis was performed to explore any moderation of the associations.
Results
Job demands were significantly associated with increased odds of high burnout risk (odds ratio (OR) 2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91–3.84. Workplace control (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.35–0.71) and peer support (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48–0.77) were significantly associated with reduced odds of high burnout risk. The interaction analysis showed no significant moderation of the association between job demands and high burnout risk by either peer support or workplace control, and no buffering impact was found.
Conclusion
Job demands were associated with high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden. Although workplace control and peer support had inverse associations with high burnout risk, no moderation or buffering impact on the association between job demands and high burnout risk was found. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these associations.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
Tourism Review
2526 citations, 11.76%
|
|
Sustainability
1259 citations, 5.86%
|
|
Current Issues in Tourism
660 citations, 3.07%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Hospitality and Tourism Management
446 citations, 2.08%
|
|
Tourism Management
361 citations, 1.68%
|
|
Tourism Management Perspectives
350 citations, 1.63%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
343 citations, 1.6%
|
|
Journal of Destination Marketing and Management
299 citations, 1.39%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
278 citations, 1.29%
|
|
International Journal of Tourism Research
270 citations, 1.26%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
269 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
266 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Journal of Travel Research
263 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research
253 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Tourism Recreation Research
252 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
252 citations, 1.17%
|
|
International Journal of Tourism Cities
214 citations, 1%
|
|
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing
192 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Annals of Tourism Research
173 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Journal of Vacation Marketing
170 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
166 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism
164 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Tourism and Hospitality Research
145 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Tourism Planning and Development
134 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
130 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Tourism Economics
122 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
122 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Anatolia
110 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
109 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
107 citations, 0.5%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
99 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of China Tourism Research
97 citations, 0.45%
|
|
SAGE Open
97 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research
97 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
93 citations, 0.43%
|
|
British Food Journal
85 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Information Technology and Tourism
84 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management
83 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Heliyon
83 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Tourism and Hospitality
82 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Land
78 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Heritage Tourism
77 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Tourism Geographies
73 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes
72 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Tourism Futures
72 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
70 citations, 0.33%
|
|
International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research
70 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Tourism Analysis
69 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events
66 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
65 citations, 0.3%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration
64 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Product and Brand Management
63 citations, 0.29%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
61 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
59 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Ecotourism
59 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality
58 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Cogent Social Sciences
56 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
53 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
51 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Spa and Wellness
48 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
47 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Bridging Tourism Theory and Practice
46 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change
44 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism
44 citations, 0.2%
|
|
PLoS ONE
44 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
42 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
42 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Air Transport Management
42 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
41 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
40 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
40 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights
39 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Event and Festival Management
38 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Administrative Sciences
37 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Convention and Event Tourism
35 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Leisure Studies
34 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
33 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
32 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Sport and Tourism
32 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Kybernetes
31 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Tourism Critiques Practice and Theory
30 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Tourism on the Verge
30 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Event Management
29 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
29 citations, 0.13%
|
|
TQM Journal
28 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Journal of Innovation Management
27 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Tourism, Hospitality & Event Management
27 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Tourism Review International
26 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Leisure Sciences
26 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
25 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Behavioral Sciences
25 citations, 0.12%
|
|
EuroMed Journal of Business
25 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Research in Transportation Business and Management
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality and Tourism
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Sustainable Development
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
23 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Hospitality Review
23 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Business Opportunities
23 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
Emerald
5517 citations, 25.68%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3998 citations, 18.61%
|
|
Elsevier
3161 citations, 14.71%
|
|
MDPI
2128 citations, 9.9%
|
|
Springer Nature
1661 citations, 7.73%
|
|
SAGE
1143 citations, 5.32%
|
|
IGI Global
750 citations, 3.49%
|
|
Wiley
582 citations, 2.71%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
255 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
205 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
201 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
106 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
62 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
56 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
48 citations, 0.22%
|
|
EDP Sciences
38 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IOP Publishing
37 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
35 citations, 0.16%
|
|
University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Opatija
30 citations, 0.14%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
26 citations, 0.12%
|
|
OpenEdition
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
19 citations, 0.09%
|
|
World Scientific
18 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
18 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
17 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
15 citations, 0.07%
|
|
AIP Publishing
14 citations, 0.07%
|
|
AOSIS
14 citations, 0.07%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
14 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Index Copernicus
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IntechOpen
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Editura Economica
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Recreation and Park Association
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
F1000 Research
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hans Publishers
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SciELO
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CAIRN
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Oxford University Press
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Akdeniz University Publishing Hous
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Knowledge E DMCC
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Intellect
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tech Science Press
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Universitesi SBE Dergisi
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Duzce University
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
JMIR Publications
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Southern Public Administration Education Foundation, Inc.
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Copernicus
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universiti Putra Malaysia
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacao Agraria e das Pescas
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fakulteta za Organizacijske Vede, Univerza v Mariboru
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Alexandria University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Academic Journals
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
BMJ
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Surgical Association
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Brill
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
King Saud University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Quality
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
School of Economics and Business in Sarajevo
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Institute of Psychology
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Taylor's University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
EJournal Publishing
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Brieflands
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Bristol University Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
23 publications, 2.19%
|
|
University of Central Florida
18 publications, 1.72%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
16 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of St. Gallen
13 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Bournemouth University
12 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Queensland
10 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Sichuan University
9 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Beijing International Studies University
9 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Greenwich
9 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Nankai University
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Valencia
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Surrey
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Huaqiao University
7 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Bern
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Canterbury
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
City University of Macau
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
5 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Akdeniz University
5 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Sadat City
5 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
5 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Hainan University
5 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Jinan University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Trento
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
James Cook University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Boğaziçi University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Istanbul University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
UCSI University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Linnaeus University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Xiamen University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Oulu
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Aalborg University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Bocconi University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Bergamo
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Griffith University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Curtin University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of South Australia
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Canberra
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Dar es Salaam
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Shandong University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Macau University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
German Sport University Cologne
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Guangxi University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
National Chiayi University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Macau
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Florida
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of the Balearic Islands
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of North Texas
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Ulster
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Primorska
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Dokuz Eylül University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Silchar
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Batman University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Sapir Academic College
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Mid Sweden University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Zurich
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Lausanne
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Capital University of Economics and Business
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Milan
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Turku
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Shanxi University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Edinburgh Napier University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Sichuan Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Chung Yuan Christian University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
National Quemoy University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Quanzhou Normal University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Qingdao University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Chitkara University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of the Sunshine Coast
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Indonesia University of Education
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Delta State University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Mauritius
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Auburn University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Hong Kong Metropolitan University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Virginia Tech
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Hangzhou City University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
14 publications, 2.88%
|
|
Sichuan University
9 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Beijing International Studies University
9 publications, 1.85%
|
|
University of Greenwich
9 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Nankai University
8 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Huaqiao University
7 publications, 1.44%
|
|
City University of Macau
6 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Bournemouth University
6 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Sadat City
5 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
5 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
5 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Hainan University
5 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Jinan University
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
UCSI University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Xiamen University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Shandong University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Central Florida
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Guangxi University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
National Chiayi University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Valencia
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of North Texas
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Silchar
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Batman University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Sapir Academic College
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Linnaeus University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Capital University of Economics and Business
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Oulu
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Shanxi University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Sichuan Agricultural University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Chung Yuan Christian University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
National Quemoy University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Quanzhou Normal University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Qingdao University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Canterbury
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Griffith University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Chitkara University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of South Australia
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of the Sunshine Coast
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Indonesia University of Education
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Mauritius
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Hong Kong Metropolitan University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Hangzhou City University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of South Florida
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Macau University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Macau
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Portsmouth
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Tashkent State University of Economics
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
King Saud University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Umm al-Qura University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Saudi Electronic University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Boğaziçi University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Zayed University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Istanbul University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Al Ain University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Iqra University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Dokuz Eylül University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Jamia Millia Islamia
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Central University of Kerala
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
University of Kashmir
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Central University of Kashmir
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Symbiosis International University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Istanbul Gelisim University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Qaemshahr Islamic Azad University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Suleyman Demirel University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Rohtak
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Vidyasagar University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
National Economics University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Hue University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Cyprus University of Technology
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
South China University of Technology
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Beihang University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Adiyaman University
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
1 publication, 0.21%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
China
|
China, 131, 12.5%
China
131 publications, 12.5%
|
USA
|
USA, 51, 4.87%
USA
51 publications, 4.87%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 43, 4.1%
United Kingdom
43 publications, 4.1%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 42, 4.01%
Switzerland
42 publications, 4.01%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 38, 3.63%
Australia
38 publications, 3.63%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 38, 3.63%
Austria
38 publications, 3.63%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 38, 3.63%
Italy
38 publications, 3.63%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 37, 3.53%
Spain
37 publications, 3.53%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 26, 2.48%
Turkey
26 publications, 2.48%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 23, 2.19%
Germany
23 publications, 2.19%
|
India
|
India, 20, 1.91%
India
20 publications, 1.91%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 14, 1.34%
Finland
14 publications, 1.34%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 13, 1.24%
New Zealand
13 publications, 1.24%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 12, 1.15%
Malaysia
12 publications, 1.15%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 12, 1.15%
Republic of Korea
12 publications, 1.15%
|
France
|
France, 11, 1.05%
France
11 publications, 1.05%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 9, 0.86%
Canada
9 publications, 0.86%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 8, 0.76%
Egypt
8 publications, 0.76%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 7, 0.67%
Poland
7 publications, 0.67%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 6, 0.57%
Belgium
6 publications, 0.57%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 6, 0.57%
Sweden
6 publications, 0.57%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.48%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.48%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 5, 0.48%
Denmark
5 publications, 0.48%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 5, 0.48%
Israel
5 publications, 0.48%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 0.48%
Netherlands
5 publications, 0.48%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.48%
Norway
5 publications, 0.48%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 5, 0.48%
Slovenia
5 publications, 0.48%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 5, 0.48%
South Africa
5 publications, 0.48%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.38%
Greece
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.38%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.38%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 4, 0.38%
Tanzania
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.29%
Russia
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.29%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.29%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 3, 0.29%
Cyprus
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 3, 0.29%
Mauritius
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 0.29%
Nigeria
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.29%
Romania
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 0.29%
Thailand
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.29%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 2, 0.19%
Barbados
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.19%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.19%
Iran
2 publications, 0.19%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.19%
UAE
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.19%
Oman
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.19%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0.19%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.1%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.1%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Belize
|
Belize, 1, 0.1%
Belize
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.1%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.1%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.1%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.1%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.1%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.1%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.1%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.1%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.1%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.1%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.1%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.1%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.1%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.1%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.1%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.1%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.1%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.1%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.1%
Japan
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Show all (41 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
China
|
China, 110, 22.63%
China
110 publications, 22.63%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 25, 5.14%
United Kingdom
25 publications, 5.14%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 20, 4.12%
Spain
20 publications, 4.12%
|
USA
|
USA, 17, 3.5%
USA
17 publications, 3.5%
|
India
|
India, 17, 3.5%
India
17 publications, 3.5%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 15, 3.09%
Australia
15 publications, 3.09%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 10, 2.06%
Malaysia
10 publications, 2.06%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 8, 1.65%
Republic of Korea
8 publications, 1.65%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 7, 1.44%
Egypt
7 publications, 1.44%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 6, 1.23%
Turkey
6 publications, 1.23%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 1.03%
Austria
5 publications, 1.03%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 1.03%
Italy
5 publications, 1.03%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 5, 1.03%
New Zealand
5 publications, 1.03%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 0.82%
Portugal
4 publications, 0.82%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.82%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.82%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.82%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.82%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 0.62%
Germany
3 publications, 0.62%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.62%
Israel
3 publications, 0.62%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 0.62%
Canada
3 publications, 0.62%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.62%
Switzerland
3 publications, 0.62%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.41%
Russia
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.41%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.41%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 2, 0.41%
Mauritius
2 publications, 0.41%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.41%
UAE
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.41%
Oman
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.41%
Poland
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.41%
Romania
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.41%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.41%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0.41%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.41%
Finland
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.41%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.41%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.21%
France
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.21%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.21%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.21%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.21%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.21%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.21%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.21%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.21%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.21%
Iran
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.21%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.21%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.21%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.21%
Norway
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.21%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.21%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.21%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.21%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.21%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.21%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.21%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Show all (24 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
1 profile journal article
Chrysikou Evangelia

University College London
26 publications,
138 citations
h-index: 7
1 profile journal article
Isabel Ana
5 publications,
23 citations
h-index: 2
1 profile journal article
Jelena Dorčić
12 publications,
170 citations
h-index: 3