Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
5.3
SJR
1.285
CiteScore
8.4
Categories
Computer Science Applications
Information Systems
Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Computer Science
Years of issue
2010-2025
journal names
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
J HOSP TOUR TECHNOL
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
(1292 citations)

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
(387 citations)

Sustainability
(270 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Central Florida
(14 publications)

University of Nevada, Las Vegas
(8 publications)

Sejong University
(6 publications)

Hong Kong Polytechnic University
(5 publications)

University of Central Florida
(5 publications)

National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
(4 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 615
Q1

Continuous use of AI technology: the roles of trust and satisfaction
Lam T.
PurposeChat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), a chatbot with artificial intelligence (AI) technology, opens up new directions for innovation. However, the extent to which literature has not considered the trustworthiness and satisfaction of ChatGPT. Those are important elements leading to continuous use (CU). Particularly, this study investigates the use of the ChatGPT Translate function. Requirements for task-AI-technology fit, trust and satisfaction relevant to ChatGPT Translate are addressed in this study.Design/methodology/approachTask-technology fit (TTF) theory forms the theoretical lens to examine the influences of TTF, AI-tech trust and satisfaction on CU of AI technology. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection. Structural equation modeling was employed to test the research model.FindingsThe findings show task and technology characteristics have positive effects on task-AI-technology fit. Task-AI-technology fit has a positive effect on AI-tech trust, which in turn has a positive effect on the CU of AI technology. Finally, the level of CU of AI technology by users satisfied with its responses is higher than users dissatisfied with its responses.Originality/valueThe results have important theoretical and practical implications for academia and industry to devise strategies and policies on a free-to-use AI system.
Q1

Investigating the impact of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intention and word-of-mouth in S-commerce
Kakkar A., Kalia P., Panesar A., Sood R.
PurposeThis study investigates the impact of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intentions and word-of-mouth in S-commerce.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 1,162 respondents in India using a quantitative methodology and convenience sampling. The conceptual model and hypotheses were examined using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).FindingsThe findings illustrate that perceived value is influenced by quality, technology and trust. Comprehending perceived value is essential for influencing customers’ buying choices and their inclination to promote favorable word-of-mouth regarding S-commerce websites. In addition, system quality was the most significant predictor among the nine predictors of perceived value for S-commerce sites.Originality/valueThis study represents an initial investigation to elucidate the influence of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intentions and word-of-mouth behavior during Indian consumers’ transition to social commerce, thereby enabling marketers to enhance their business and customer retention strategies.
Q1

A behavioral intention model of Gen Z female’ health information behavior on social media
Afifi S., Bakti I.G., Yaman A., Sumaedi S.
PurposeThis study aims to develop and validate a behavioral intention model for understanding the health information behavior of Generation Z females on social media. The model integrates variables such as familiarity, e-health literacy, trust and altruistic motivation.Design/methodology/approachConducted in Indonesia, the online survey involved 516 active female Generation Z respondents (aged 17–26) seeking health information on social media in the past six months. Utilizing the partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM), the study employed Smart PLS Version 4.0 for rigorous model validation and hypothesis testing in two stages: measurement and structural model analyses. This encompassed evaluating reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity.FindingsResults indicate that familiarity, e-health literacy, trust and altruistic motivation significantly influence the health information behavior of Generation Z females on social media. Furthermore, both familiarity and e-health literacy positively impact trust in social media as a reliable health information source. The study explores theoretical, managerial and policy implications.Originality/valueSocial media has become a crucial platform for health-related information, particularly among Generation Z females. Despite this, there is a significant research gap in the behavioral intention model for Generation Z females’ health information behavior on social media. This study introduces a unique information behavioral intention model shedding light on this behavior.
Q1

Understanding the role of privacy issues in AIoT device adoption within smart homes: an integrated model of privacy calculus and technology acceptance
Liang S., Shi C.
PurposeThe proliferation of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) devices has introduced notable privacy concerns, influencing user adoption and trust. This study integrates privacy calculus theory with the technology acceptance model to analyze how privacy risk perception affects users’ intentions to adopt and continue using AIoT devices.Design/methodology/approachA research model was developed and validated using data from 313 AIoT users. Findings indicate that perceived usefulness and ease of use significantly enhance users’ trust in AIoT devices. Additionally, prior privacy experiences and privacy knowledge amplify users’ privacy concerns.FindingsPrivacy risk perception and concerns reduce trust in AIoT devices but do not significantly deter continued usage intentions, highlighting a “privacy paradox” where functionality and convenience outweigh privacy concerns. Future research is encouraged to examine user attitudes across diverse demographics and controlled settings to gain deeper insights into privacy perceptions and behaviors toward AIoT.Originality/valueThese findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of AIoT adoption dynamics and offer practical implications for designing privacy-conscious AIoT applications.
Q1

Google Discover data-driven study of user activity on e-commerce platforms
Strzelecki A., Rizun M.
PurposeThis research focuses on the analysis of the recommendation algorithms employed by Google Discover, utilizing data from two e-commerce platforms operating in Poland.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses the information obtained from Google Search Console in a time span of 17 months. The examination of Google Discover focuses on the number of displays, clicks and click-through ratio, from the viewpoints of content publishers and web users.FindingsThe results suggest that user engagement positively influences a website’s efficiency in Google Discover, yet the algorithm also considers variables such as the popularity of similar content on other websites, user location and content update frequency. Thus, a website may be excluded from Discover despite a substantial click count.Originality/valueThere is a lack of studies on how Google Discover is perceived by users based on real data. We offer a quantitative perspective, which has not yet been done. This study offers an overview of the history and evolution of Google Discovery, an overview of data we used to show the perception of the service, and two unique perspectives on recommender service, users and publishers.
Q1

A riot of blooms begins to dazzle the eye: cognitive behavior with multimodal discourse during usefulness judgments of health information
Chen J., Zhang L.
PurposeAs the two sides of the same coin, usefulness and usability have emerged as pivotal research themes in user experience field. This study compares cognitive effort and cognitive resource allocation strategy across documents varying perceived usefulness and then across documents with different objective usability (unimodal vs multimodal discourses).Design/methodology/approachA controlled user study of four identifying tasks related to public health epidemics was conducted to collect data, including document usefulness as perceived by participants, presentation modes of the document and gaze behaviors on each document.FindingsUsefulness and modality discourse impact cognitive effort and resource allocation strategy in health information search. In useless health documents, spatial encoding resource spending increased significantly with multimodal discourse, and a spatial browsing strategy with an evident exploratory feature was applied; while in useful documents, including low-useful and high-useful, both spatial and information encoding resource spending increased significantly with multimodal discourse, and an information processing strategy with an evident comprehensive feature was applied. Notably, multimodal discourse failed to enhance decision-making effectiveness. Furthermore, in useful documents, the interaction effect of the presentation mode of useful information and multimodal discourse on cognitive effort followed an inverted U-shape pattern.Originality/valueThis paper sheds new light on the interaction effect of usefulness and usability on cognitive effort and resource allocation strategy, highlighting its significance in cognitive effort detecting for multimodal discourse and improving effectiveness and efficacy of health information identification by optimizing information presentation mode design.
Q1

Consumer response to OTT subscription promotions in Taiwan: a prospective theoretical perspective
Chen Y., Han H., Hsiao W.
PurposeThis article investigates the impact of consumers’ promotion strategies on the effectiveness of promotional campaigns for subscribing to Over-the-Top (OTT) streaming services, from a prospective theoretical perspective. Additionally, it explores the moderating effects of platform type and subscriber type on promotion strategies in the context of OTT streaming services.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs an experimental design to separately examine the promotion strategies of subscribers. The first part investigates the effect of promotion strategies on promotional effectiveness, regardless of platform and subscriber types, while the second part considers the moderating effects of both platform type and subscriber type on promotional effectiveness.FindingsThe analysis reveals that renewed subscribers exhibit a positive attitude toward incremental promotions and have stronger intentions to subscribe and recommend. Nonrenewed subscribers, in contrast, prefer discount promotions, demonstrating a positive attitude toward them and expressing higher intentions to subscribe and recommend.Originality/valueThis study applies prospect theory to OTT promotion strategies, uncovers the psychological drivers behind promotion effectiveness and examines the moderating role of subscriber type and platform type, thereby providing actionable insights to improve consumers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions.
Q1

Study on the model of factors influencing users’ willingness to participate in misinformation purification on the Weibo platform
Zhao Y., Li G., Mo Z.
PurposeTo explore the influence factors and pathways of users’ willingness to participate in the misinformation purification process on the Weibo platform. The findings of this study are expected to provide valuable insights that can enhance the self-purification mechanisms for misinformation on Weibo, thereby contributing to the effective misinformation control.Design/methodology/approachThe theoretical framework of the quantitative study is a conceptual model integrated with the theory of planned behavior (TPB), social exchange theory (SET) and co-dependency theory. This model was developed to elucidate the influence factors of users’ willingness to participate in the purification of misinformation on the Weibo platform, the conceptual model was tested and refined through questionnaire surveys, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to assess its validity and reliability.FindingsThe findings reveal that the attitude toward misinformation purification on the Weibo platform exerts the most significant positive influence on the willingness to engage in such activities. Within the context of this research, community involvement and reciprocity are identified as the factors that have the most substantial positive impact on users’ attitude toward misinformation purification. Conversely, risk perception does not demonstrate a significant influence on users’ attitude toward misinformation purification.Originality/valueTaking the Weibo platform as an example, this is a pioneering study on the investigation and mechanism of social media self-purification on misinformation and proposes a new perspective to improve the effectiveness of the social media self-purification mechanism from the perspective of focusing on user intention and motivation.
Q1

Chatbot research in the fields of business and information systems: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis
Li Z., Wu C., Li J., Yuan Q.
PurposeChatbots are increasingly embodied in business and IS contexts to enhance customer and user experience. Despite wide interest in chatbots among business and IS academics, surprisingly, there are no current comprehensive reviews to reveal the knowledge structure of chatbot research in such areas.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed a mixed-method approach that combines systematic review and bibliometric analysis to provide a comprehensive synthesis of chatbot research. The sample was obtained in December 2023 after searching across six databases: EBSCOhost, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Computer Society Digital Library.FindingsThis study reveals the major trend in publication trends, countries, article performance and cluster distribution of chatbot research. We also identify the key themes of chatbot research, which mainly focus on how users interact with chatbots and their consequences, such as users’ cognition and behavior. Moreover, several important research agendas have been discussed to address some limitations in the current chatbot research in business and IS fields.Originality/valueThe present review is one of the first attempts to systematically reveal the ongoing knowledge map of chatbots in business and IS fields, which makes important contributions and provides useful resources for future chatbot research and practice.
Q1

Examining generative AI user continuance intention based on the SOR model
Zhou T., Ma X.
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to examine generative artificial intelligence (AI) user continuance intention based on the stimulus-organism-response model.Design/methodology/approachWe adopted a mixed method of structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to conduct data analysis.FindingsThe results found that generative AI content quality (perceived personalization, perceived accuracy and perceived credibility) and system quality (perceived interactivity, perceived anthropomorphism and perceived intelligence) affect sense of empowerment and satisfaction, both of which further determine continuance intention.Originality/valueExtant research has identified the effect of flow, trust and parasocial interaction on generative AI user continuance, but it has seldom disclosed the internal decisional process of generative AI user continuance intention. This research tries to fill this gap, and the results enrich the extant research on generative AI user continuance.
Q1

The impact of emotional cues on the information-gathering willingness of paid knowledge users
Cao Y., Deng X.
PurposeThis study aims to explore the impact of emotional cues in knowledge product descriptions on users’ willingness to gather information. It specifically focuses on how different types of textual emotional cues, including heuristic cues like “emotional titles” and systematic cues like “emotional synopses,” influence users’ information-gathering willingness and examines the mediating role of emotional arousal in this process.Design/methodology/approachA conceptual model was developed by integrating the heuristic-systematic model with cue utilization theory. The experimental design employed knowledge product descriptions from the “Knowledge Column” section of the Zhihu platform. A controlled experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of varying emotional cues in these descriptions on participants’ willingness to gather information.FindingsThe study identified two types of emotional cues – heuristic cues, such as “emotional titles,” and systematic cues, such as “emotional synopses” – that significantly and positively influence users' information-gathering willingness. Additionally, emotional arousal was found to mediate the relationship between emotional cues and users’ willingness to gather information in the context of knowledge payments.Originality/valueThis study confirms that emotional cues in knowledge product descriptions, mediated by emotional arousal, can enhance the information-gathering willingness of knowledge payment users. The research deepens the theoretical exploration of information behavior among online knowledge payment users, providing valuable insights for knowledge producers on effectively leveraging emotional cues to attract potential customers as well as offering guidance for knowledge payment users in their information-gathering practices.
Q1

Motivating user engagement in online health Q&A communities: do contingent financial incentives matter?
He L., Huang Y., Li S., Zhou X.
PurposeUser engagement is critical for online health Q&A communities. Financial incentives, which vary across different communities and reward schemes, are expected to motivate such contribution behaviors. Even though financial incentives have been extensively examined in prior studies, the impact of newly designed contingent financial incentives of a new pay-for-answer reward scheme has not been empirically examined in any online health Q&A community. Given this research gap, our study aims to perform an exploratory investigation of the effects of contingent financial incentives on user engagement in terms of knowledge contribution and social interactions.Design/methodology/approachBased on expectancy-value theory and equity theory, a research model was developed to reflect the influences of contingent financial incentives on user engagement. A unique dataset was gathered from a large online health Q&A community utilizing this contingent financial incentive reward structure, and the Heckman selection model was applied using a two-step procedure to test these hypotheses. Possible endogeneity issues were also addressed in the robustness check.FindingsOur results demonstrate that the effect of contingent financial incentives on answer quantity and quality is quadratic. Additionally, our study reveals that this contingent financial incentive enhances both comment and emotional interactions among users.Originality/valueOur study enriches the literature on financial incentives, knowledge contribution and user engagement by revealing the nuanced effects of financial incentives within a novel pay-for-answer scheme. This study also offers significant implications for practitioners involved in online community incentive design.
Q1

Feedback from the younger generation on health information shared by their parents on WeChat: types, antecedents and consequences
Li X., Liu M., Song X., Zhu Q.
PurposeIn China, it is prevalent for parents to share health information on WeChat and receive feedback from their children. This study aims to investigate the feedback from younger generations regarding their parents’ health information sharing. It will examine the different types of feedback, explore the factors influencing it and analyze the outcomes that result from this feedback exchange.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical findings draw on the qualitative analysis using grounded theory. This study collects data from 34 participants (17 pairs of one young person and one parent) through in-depth interviews and WeChat chat records. Then, a theoretical model was developed through open, axial and selective coding.FindingsFeedback can be classified into five types: support, correction, perfunctoriness, ostracism and rejection as well as into “Affective-Behavioral-Cognitive” dimensions. Younger generations’ feedback types are influenced by a variety of factors, including information, emotion and individual and family-related factors. Each feedback type has distinct effects, such as altering older generations’ emotional and communication responses.Originality/valueThis pioneering study explores how younger generations in China perceive their parents’ health information sharing on social media. It highlights the importance of feedback in this context, providing actionable insights to enhance digital literacy among older adults, strengthen family bonds and enhance the spread of valuable and scientific health information online.
Q1

Does ChatGPT affect users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities?
Li G., Zhu M.X.
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the impact of ChatGPT on users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online question-and-answer (Q&A) communities based on social exchange theory and stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from a Chinese online Q&A community, and the difference-in-differences (DID) model was employed to verify the proposed hypotheses.FindingsThe results show that ChatGPT negatively impacts users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities, with variations observed across different knowledge domains.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt to examine the impact of ChatGPT on users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities. The findings provide valuable insights for community managers to develop strategies for mitigating the effects of ChatGPT on online Q&A communities.
Q1

Promoting health behavioral intention through short videos: roles of audiovisual cross-modal correspondence in health communication
Xu Y., Jiang T., Hu X., Tian H.
PurposeHealth short videos are serving as a powerful tool for encouraging individuals to actively adopt healthier behaviors. The sensory cues applied in these videos can be useful for engaging peripheral processing and enhancing attitudes. While previous research has examined the effects of various single cues, this study features a pioneering attempt to explore the roles of audiovisual cross-modal correspondence, encompassing multisensory cues perceived through different modalities, in health communication.Design/methodology/approachA 2 (color: warm/cool) × 2 (music tempo: fast/slow) between-subjects experiment was conducted to observe 120 participants’ responses to a health short video promoting eye health that was created using four different combinations of background color and background music tempo.FindingsIt was found that the congruent color–tempo pairings, that is blue & slow and orange & fast, led to more positive attitudes toward the videos than the incongruent pairings, that is blue & fast and orange & slow. The effect of cross-modal correspondence on attitude was fully mediated by processing fluency, with gender acting as a moderator between the two variables. Furthermore, individuals’ attitudes toward a short video positively influenced their health behavioral intentions.Originality/valueThese findings not only lend support to the theoretical framework of “multisensory cues-fluency-attitude-intention” chain for persuasion purposes but also have practical implications for creating effective health short videos.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
1292 citations, 12.51%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
387 citations, 3.75%
|
|
Sustainability
270 citations, 2.61%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
189 citations, 1.83%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Hospitality and Tourism Management
183 citations, 1.77%
|
|
Current Issues in Tourism
170 citations, 1.65%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
146 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Tourism Management
139 citations, 1.35%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management
137 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Tourism Review
130 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
125 citations, 1.21%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research
120 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Tourism Management Perspectives
113 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism
97 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing
94 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Journal of Travel Research
92 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Journal of Vacation Marketing
90 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research
80 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Destination Marketing and Management
76 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
69 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
65 citations, 0.63%
|
|
SAGE Open
64 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
62 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Tourism and Hospitality Research
60 citations, 0.58%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
59 citations, 0.57%
|
|
International Journal of Tourism Research
58 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Information Technology and Tourism
54 citations, 0.52%
|
|
International Journal of Tourism Cities
53 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
51 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
50 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
47 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Tourism Economics
46 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
45 citations, 0.44%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration
45 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Tourism Recreation Research
44 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of Foodservice Business Research
44 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Technology in Society
41 citations, 0.4%
|
|
British Food Journal
40 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Annals of Tourism Research
40 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Heliyon
39 citations, 0.38%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
39 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Cornell Hospitality Quarterly
36 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of China Tourism Research
34 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
34 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Cogent Social Sciences
34 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes
33 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
33 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
32 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality
32 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Business Opportunities
30 citations, 0.29%
|
|
European Journal of Innovation Management
29 citations, 0.28%
|
|
International Journal of Information Management
28 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Internet Research
28 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Anatolia
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Tourism Futures
26 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
26 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Kybernetes
25 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Consumer Studies
25 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
24 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research
23 citations, 0.22%
|
|
TQM Journal
23 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Administrative Sciences
23 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research
22 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Heritage Tourism
22 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Tourism and Hospitality
22 citations, 0.21%
|
|
PLoS ONE
21 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Hospitality Review
21 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Convention and Event Tourism
20 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Industrial Management and Data Systems
20 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
19 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
19 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
19 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Bank Marketing
18 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication
18 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
17 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Studies in Computational Intelligence
17 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
17 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management
17 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC
17 citations, 0.16%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
17 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Information Technology and People
16 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
16 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
16 citations, 0.15%
|
|
EuroMed Journal of Business
16 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Electronic Markets
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Marketing Intelligence and Planning
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Aslib Journal of Information Management
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IEEE Access
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Benchmarking
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advances in E-Business Research Series
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
FIIB Business Review
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Psychology and Marketing
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Behaviour and Information Technology
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Electronic Commerce Research
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Event and Festival Management
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
Emerald
3203 citations, 31.01%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1634 citations, 15.82%
|
|
Elsevier
1455 citations, 14.09%
|
|
Springer Nature
735 citations, 7.12%
|
|
SAGE
629 citations, 6.09%
|
|
IGI Global
604 citations, 5.85%
|
|
MDPI
564 citations, 5.46%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
281 citations, 2.72%
|
|
Wiley
249 citations, 2.41%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
82 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
53 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
47 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
42 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
35 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
34 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
World Scientific
24 citations, 0.23%
|
|
AIP Publishing
23 citations, 0.22%
|
|
EDP Sciences
18 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IOP Publishing
17 citations, 0.16%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
16 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
16 citations, 0.15%
|
|
University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Opatija
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
JMIR Publications
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IOS Press
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
King Saud University
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Akdeniz University Publishing Hous
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AOSIS
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Oxford University Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tech Science Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Universitesi SBE Dergisi
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Geographical Research Institute
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Sumy State University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science Alert
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Knowledge E DMCC
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
OpenEdition
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Digital Transformation and Technological Innovation
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CAIRN
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society of Kansei Engineering
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Inovatus Usluge d.o.o.
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Brill
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Index Copernicus
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Open Library of Humanities
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institut Pertanian Bogor
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
National Institute of Psychology
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Asian Exercise and Sport Science Association
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Universite de Lille
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Ain Shams University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
National Recreation and Park Association
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Alexandria University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
SciELO
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
EJournal Publishing
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
FSBEI HE Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Human Kinetics
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika/Nicolaus Copernicus University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
European Alliance for Innovation n.o.
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Intellect
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Technoscience Academy
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
University of Central Florida
14 publications, 2.78%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
8 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Sejong University
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Houston
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
City University of Macau
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Texas Tech University
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Taylor's University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Purdue University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Bournemouth University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Anadolu University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Yarmouk University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
National Institute of Development Administration
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Granada
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Abu Dhabi University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National Quemoy University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Calabria
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Molise
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Bocconi University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Bandung Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
George Mason University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Virginia Tech
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
San Francisco State University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of South Florida
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Macau University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Temple University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Valencia
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Florida
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Louisiana State University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Delaware
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
ITMO University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
King Saud University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Alfaisal University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Jeddah
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Tehran
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Al-Baha University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Marmara University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Sakarya University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Hyderabad
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Lovely Professional University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Selcuk University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Central Punjab
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Eskisehir Osmangazi University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Kadir Has University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Okan University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Economics and Law
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Punjabi University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Qatar University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Antalya Bilim University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Eskisehir Technical University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
The MARA Technological University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Autonomous University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Tampere University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Multimedia University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Nanjing University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Kuala Lumpur
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
5 publications, 1.88%
|
|
University of Central Florida
5 publications, 1.88%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Sejong University
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
City University of Macau
4 publications, 1.5%
|
|
National Institute of Development Administration
3 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Houston
3 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Abu Dhabi University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Bandung Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Macau University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Granada
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Bournemouth University
2 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
ITMO University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Al-Baha University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Sakarya University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Lovely Professional University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University of Central Punjab
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Eskisehir Osmangazi University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Kadir Has University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University of Economics and Law
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Punjabi University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Antalya Bilim University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Eskisehir Technical University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Anadolu University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
The MARA Technological University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Autonomous University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Taylor's University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Nanjing University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Karlstad University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Capital Normal University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Ocean University of China
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Beijing Technology and Business University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Yarmouk University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Hunan Normal University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Nanchang University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Shanghai Polytechnic University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Åbo Akademi University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Sichuan Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Anhui Normal University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Shih Chien University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Tamkang University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Anhui University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Hefei Normal University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Huaqiao University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University of Stavanger
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University of Molise
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Curtin University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
IPB University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Washington State University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Yonsei University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Hanyang University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Chung-Ang University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Pusan National University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Pan-Atlantic University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Dongguk University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Northwestern University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Gachon University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Chonbuk National University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Sogang University
1 publication, 0.38%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
USA
|
USA, 92, 18.25%
USA
92 publications, 18.25%
|
China
|
China, 46, 9.13%
China
46 publications, 9.13%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 19, 3.77%
Spain
19 publications, 3.77%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 19, 3.77%
Republic of Korea
19 publications, 3.77%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 14, 2.78%
Turkey
14 publications, 2.78%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 11, 2.18%
Portugal
11 publications, 2.18%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 9, 1.79%
Italy
9 publications, 1.79%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 9, 1.79%
Malaysia
9 publications, 1.79%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 7, 1.39%
Thailand
7 publications, 1.39%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 1.19%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 1.19%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 5, 0.99%
Australia
5 publications, 0.99%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 5, 0.99%
Vietnam
5 publications, 0.99%
|
India
|
India, 5, 0.99%
India
5 publications, 0.99%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.79%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.79%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 4, 0.79%
Finland
4 publications, 0.79%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.6%
Greece
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.6%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.6%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.6%
Iran
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 0.6%
Pakistan
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.4%
Russia
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.4%
Austria
2 publications, 0.4%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.4%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.4%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.4%
UAE
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.4%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.4%
Japan
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 0.2%
Germany
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.2%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.2%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.2%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.2%
Israel
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.2%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.2%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.2%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.2%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.2%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.2%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.2%
Norway
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.2%
Romania
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.2%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.2%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.2%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.2%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Show all (13 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
China
|
China, 39, 14.66%
China
39 publications, 14.66%
|
USA
|
USA, 25, 9.4%
USA
25 publications, 9.4%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 16, 6.02%
Republic of Korea
16 publications, 6.02%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 12, 4.51%
Spain
12 publications, 4.51%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 10, 3.76%
Turkey
10 publications, 3.76%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 8, 3.01%
Portugal
8 publications, 3.01%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 5, 1.88%
Vietnam
5 publications, 1.88%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 1.5%
Thailand
4 publications, 1.5%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 1.13%
Indonesia
3 publications, 1.13%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 1.13%
Malaysia
3 publications, 1.13%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 1.13%
Pakistan
3 publications, 1.13%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.75%
Russia
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 0.75%
Australia
2 publications, 0.75%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 2, 0.75%
United Kingdom
2 publications, 0.75%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.75%
India
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.75%
Italy
2 publications, 0.75%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.75%
UAE
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.75%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.75%
Japan
2 publications, 0.75%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.38%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.38%
Israel
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.38%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.38%
Iran
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.38%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.38%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.38%
Norway
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.38%
Romania
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.38%
Finland
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.38%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.38%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.38%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.38%
|
Show all (1 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|