Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
2.8
SJR
1.020
CiteScore
5.9
Categories
Aquatic Science
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Years of issue
1971-2025
journal names
Freshwater Biology
FRESHWATER BIOL
Top-3 citing journals

Freshwater Biology
(22452 citations)

Hydrobiologia
(18702 citations)

Science of the Total Environment
(8655 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Aarhus University
(118 publications)

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
(99 publications)

University of Copenhagen
(93 publications)

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
(22 publications)

Aarhus University
(20 publications)

Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
(19 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 3032
Q1

Revealing the mechanisms of adopting innovative on-site industrialized construction technology: an integrated SEM-ISM method
Liu X., Li Z., Ma S., Meng Q., Zheng R.
PurposeOn-site industrialized construction (OIC) represents a significant innovation direction for the industrial transformation of the construction industry. However, compared to prefabricated construction (PC) technology, OIC technology has not received sufficient attention. In particular, the lack of mechanisms for the adoption of OIC technology has significantly hindered the innovation and diffusion of this technology. This paper aims to address this gap by identifying the drivers and barriers of OIC technology and exploring the logical relationships among these influencing factors.Design/methodology/approachTherefore, this study aims to analyze the factors influencing OIC technology adoption, focusing on both drivers and barriers, to promote its adoption among construction companies. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is employed to validate the significance of influencing factors, while interpretive structural modeling (ISM) is utilized to explore the interrelationships among the factors supported by PLS-SEM.FindingsThe results of PLS-SEM show that relative advantage, regulatory support, top management support, organizational readiness and market demand positively influence adoption intention, while perceived risk, complexity and cost have a negative impact. Additionally, the root driver identified by ISM analysis is labor shortage, and the root barrier is comprehension presents challenges. It is noteworthy that the root driver is derived from market demand, but the low path coefficient for market demand in PLS-SEM indicates limited direct effects. This suggests that market demand influences adoption intention by driving other mediating factors, which still require sufficient attention.Originality/valueThis study elucidates the factors and mechanisms influencing the adoption of OIC technology, supplementing the knowledge base in the domains of industrialized construction (IC) and engineering technological innovation. Additionally, it offers valuable insights for construction companies actively engaged in construction industrialization reform, facilitating the effective promotion of OIC technology.
Q1

Improving CSR performance of food processing firms with operational risks: does digital investment matter?
Ouyang Y., Ye F., Li Y.
PurposeCorporate social responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a prominent public concern; however, within the agricultural sector, many firms demonstrate unsatisfactory performance in terms of CSR activities. Drawing upon the behavioral theory of the firm, this study aims to investigate how operational risks faced by agriculture-related firms affect its CSR practices.Design/methodology/approachUsing a data of 136 Chinese food processing firms with 909 observations from 2011 to 2021, this study constructs the fixed-effect model to analyze the relationship among operational risks, digital investment and CSR practices.FindingsThe empirical evidence shows that competition risk significantly improves CSR performance while financial risk hinders it. The results of moderation analysis further reveal that digital investment strengthens the positive effect of competition risk and the negative effect of financial risk, although the latter is not statistically significant.Originality/valueOverall, by establishing a link between operational risks and CSR practices, this study contributes to clarifying decision-making rules for food processing firms and deepening the understanding of why and when they adopt social responsibility initiatives.
Q1

Is digitalization a double-edged sword for innovation? A buyer–supplier dyad
Yang W., Song Z., Zhou Y., Cheng L.
PurposeDigitalization presents both opportunities and challenges for collaborative innovation within supply chains (SCs). Based on resource dependence theory (RDT), this study examines the underlying mechanisms of digitalization and innovation performance, elucidating the mediation and moderating role of interfirm IT integration and relational norms in the above relationships.Design/methodology/approachHierarchical regression analysis is used to test the model from 170 buyer–supplier dyads in China.FindingsThis study’s empirical findings demonstrate that digitalization has an inverted U-shaped relationship with innovation performance in buyer–supplier relationships (BSRs), and interfirm IT integration partially mediates this relationship. Specifically, digitalization has an inverted U-shaped relationship with interfirm IT integration, and interfirm IT integration positively affects innovation performance. Finally, relational norms moderate this inverted U-shaped relationship, making it steeper.Originality/valueThis study embeds the impact of digitalization on innovation performance within SC relationships. By using the buyer–supplier dyad as the analysis unit, the study reveals that digitalization brings both benefits and risks to innovation performance in BSRs. Furthermore, by clarifying the role of interfirm IT integration and relational norms, the study uncovers the mediating mechanisms and boundary conditions in this relationship, thereby enriching the understanding of SC digitalization.
Q1

Examining the nexus: supply chain quality management, knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and strategic business performance
Lim A., Ooi K., Lee V., Tan G.W., Sohal A.
PurposeManufacturers face many challenges in continual innovation and strategical adaptation to environmental changes. Businesses must embrace evolved management theory while implementing a robust supply chain quality management (SCQM) strategy for a sustainable supply chain (SDG12). However, there is a dearth of awareness in applying knowledge-based dynamic capability (KBDC) in SCQM. Furthermore, knowledge sharing, an important component of KBDC, has received less attention when assessing organizational innovation and strategic business performance (SBP). Hence, our study aims to identify the impact of SCQM practices on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP by applying the KBDC theory.Design/methodology/approachWe empirically tested 204 valid questionnaire responses received from Malaysian manufacturers using a deep partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) analysis.FindingsOur study reveals that SCQM practices have a significant direct impact on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP. Furthermore, our research indicates that knowledge sharing mediates (partially complementary mediation) the association between SCQM practices and organizational innovation but not SCQM practices and SBP.Originality/valueOur study contributes to the KBDC theory by illustrating the significance of SCQM practices on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP. The study findings provide a greater understanding of the impact of SCQM practices on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP, thereby shedding light on the importance of practices related to human capital development and integration that manufacturers should consider when designing a SCQM system. The study shall assist the manufacturers in achieving a sustainable supply chain (SDG 12).
Q1

The role of IT governance and organizational agility in enhancing firm performance: a study of Asian and Latin American firms
Yoshikuni A.C., Dwivedi R., Kamal M.M., Fosso Wamba S., Dwivedi P.
PurposeThe role of information technology governance (ITG) is crucial to enable organizational agility (OA) to leverage firm performance (FP). ITG capability helps firms optimize market and operational activities and improves corporate performance. Therefore, the paper aims to examine the relationship between ITG’s capability to emerge AO and leverage FP in developing economies.Design/methodology/approachThis research is conducted in an empirical setting comprising a quantitative cross-country survey based on a sample of 433 enterprises from Asia (AS) and Latin America (LA) regions.FindingsThe outcome of the research demonstrates the significant impact of ITG capability on OA to achieve FP. The results further indicate that ITG capability plays a vital role in the FP through operational adjustment agility than market capitalizing agility in AS than LA organizations.Practical implicationsThe empirical study demonstrates that managers must better understand how ITG capability was composed through IT strategy, IT architecture, IT infrastructure, IT business knowledge and IT management to influence OA to gain FP independently of the region.Originality/valueThe findings offer valuable insights for academics and practitioners into ITG capability, appropriate IT architecture, IT infrastructure, IT business knowledge, IT management and IT strategy to reach dynamic capability in organizational agility to enhance FP in developing economies.
Q1

Balanced social media engagement and firm performance in consumer goods industry
Shu S., Zhang H.
PurposeThis paper investigates the spillover effect of firms’ social media engagement with investors on consumption market performance and examines the impact of balanced/imbalanced social media stakeholder engagement strategies on firms’ consumption market performance.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs multi-source secondary data covering 3,856 quarterly observations of 188 firms in the Chinese retail industry over six years (2015–2020). Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology are used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe study reveals that firms’ social media engagement with investors has a positive spillover effect on consumption market performance. Additionally, the authors find that a balanced social media engagement strategy, which allocates resources evenly between consumers and investors, is more likely to optimize firm performance than an imbalanced strategy.Originality/valueThe research reveals cross-stakeholder spillover effects of social media engagement, introduces balanced/imbalanced engagement strategy concepts and extends the balanced marketing perspective to the social media context, providing guidance for firms to optimize their social media strategies.
Q1

Timing and interdependencies in blockchain capabilities development for supply chain management: a resource-based view perspective
Lima B., Ganga G.M., Godinho Filho M., De Santa-Eulalia L.A., Thürer M., Queiroz M.M., Moraes K.K.
PurposeUsing the resource-based view (RBV), our study aims to provide theoretical and empirical insights into blockchain capabilities’ (BCs) compounded and sequential effects on supply chain competitive advantages (CA).Design/methodology/approachWe combined a systematic literature review and an expert interview. Interpretive Structural Modelling and a Matrix of Cross-Impact Multiplications Applied to Classification were used to determine the relationship between the capabilities. Simple Additive Weighting assessed each capability’s relative importance and impact.FindingsWe reveal a sequential development path for BCs. Foundational capabilities, such as cybersecurity, provide immediate performance benefits, establishing a unique, valuable and inimitable resource. As firms progress to advanced capabilities, the compounded value of these capabilities generates a stronger, dynamic resource for sustained CA. Moreover, the study underscores the strategic importance of timing in adopting and developing BCs, as early adoption can secure a competitive edge difficult for later entrants to replicate.Practical implicationsOur proposed framework guides managers in incorporating blockchain technology into supply chain management (SCM) processes once it demonstrates that firms can enhance their CA by prioritizing the technical basics BC, leveraging the informational capabilities in level two and enabling effective problem-solving through level three. Our framework also shows that a learning process occurs as BCs are used and their results are explored.Originality/valueOur study extends the RBV by demonstrating BCs’ cumulative and interdependent nature in SCM. It emphasizes the synergistic interactions between these capabilities, which collectively enhance CA.
Q1

A dual adversarial structure of generative adversarial network for nature language generation
Sue K., Chen Y.
PurposeRecently, due to the practicability in several domains, generative adversarial network (GAN) has successfully been adopted in the field of natural language generation (NLG). The purpose of this paper focuses on improving the quality of text and generating sequences similar to human writing for several real applications.Design/methodology/approachA novel model, GAN2, is developed based on a GAN with dual adversarial architecture. We train the generator by an internal discriminator with a beam search technique to improve the quality of generated sequences. Then, we enhance the generator with an external discriminator to optimize and strengthen the learning process of sequence generation.FindingsThe proposed GAN2 model could be utilized in widespread applications, such as chatbots, machine translation and image description. By the proposed dual adversarial structure, we significantly improve the quality of the generated text. The average and top-1 metrics, such as NLL, BLEU and ROUGE, are used to measure the generated sentences from the GAN2 model over all baselines. Several experiments are conducted to demonstrate the performance and superiority of the proposed model compared with the state-of-the-art methods on numerous evaluation metrics.Originality/valueGenerally, reward sparsity and mode collapse are two main challenging issues when adopt GAN to real NLG applications. In this study, GAN2 exploits a dual adversarial architecture which facilitates the learning process in the early training stage for solving the problem of reward sparsity. The occurrence of mode collapse also could be reduced in the later training stage with the introduced comparative discriminator by avoiding high rewards for training in a specific mode. Furthermore, the proposed model is applied to several synthetic and real datasets to show the practicability and exhibit great generalization with all discussed metrics.
Q1

Critical factors for green supply chain management implementation in footwear industry
Pai F., Yeh T., Chen Y.
PurposeThe study aims to investigate the implementation of green supply chain management (GSCM) in the footwear industry. It focuses on identifying key factors (dimensions and corresponding sub-dimensions) that promote GSCM and examines the importance and relevance of these factors in improving sustainability and competitive advantage within the footwear manufacturing supply chain.Design/methodology/approachA literature review and expert interviews were conducted to identify the factors for GSCM in the footwear industry. The DEMATEL-based ANP (DANP) method was used to analyze the importance and interrelationships of the identified dimensions and sub-dimensions. The data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed across different levels of the supply chain to compare the significant factors affecting GSCM implementation.FindingsThe study reveals that green purchasing is the core dimension, playing a critical role in the footwear industry. Organizational and environmental management emerges as the most influential causal factors, strongly correlated with other factors. However, as to sub-dimensions, different level of supply chain members should focus on different sub-dimensions.Originality/valueThis research provides valuable insights into the key dimensions and sub-dimensions and their causal relationships in the footwear industry. It offers practical suggestions for manufacturers to prioritize organizational and environmental management as a strategic approach to maximize the benefits of GSCM.
Q1

A model for selecting supply chain collaboration paradigms: the impact of intelligent manufacturing models
Hou K., Niu Z., Zhang Y.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore how to select a suitable supply chain collaboration paradigm (SCCP) based on the intelligent manufacturing model (IMM) of enterprises.Design/methodology/approachGiven the fit between internal collaboration and external collaboration, we propose a model to select a suitable SCCP based on two-sided matching between SCCPs and IMMs. In this decision problem, we invited five university scholars and seven related consultants to evaluate SCCPs and IMMs based on the regret theory, which is used to obtain the perceived utility and matching results. The evaluation values are comfortably expressed through probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs). Also, we set the lowest acceptance threshold to improve the accuracy of matching results.FindingsThe findings indicate that the characteristics of IMMs can significantly influence the selection of SCCPs, and an SCCP is not suitable for all IMMs. Interestingly, the study findings suggest that the selection of SCCP is diverse and multi-optional under the constraints of IMMs.Originality/valueExisting studies have explored supply chain collaboration (SCC) in Industry 4.0 to improve supply chain performance, but less attention has been paid to the impact of the match between SCCPs and IMMs on supply chain performance. And even fewer studies have addressed how to select a suitable SCCP in different IMMs. This study provides a unique contribution to the practice of SCC and expands the understanding of supply chain management in Industry 4.0.
Q1

Effective strategies in short video advertising: leveraging influencer endorsements and discounts
Yuan L., Shi Y., Xia H., Ye Q.
PurposeThis paper aims to examine how the number of short videos posted and the number of influencers employed, two important strategies in short video marketing, affect consumer behavior and how price discounts moderate the effects of influencer endorsement on consumer browsing and purchasing behavior.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the literature on influencer endorsement, this study used an ordinary least square model to empirically examine the two effects of endorsement strategies in increasing product traffic and sales for consumers at a short video app, Douyin (TikTok).FindingsThe results show that the number of short video ads produces the classic inverted U-shape for traffic and sales, and both effects were strengthened under a high discount condition. Whereas the number of influencers has a positive effect on traffic but produces an inverted U-shape for sales, both effects were undermined under a high discount condition.Originality/valueThis study is the first to explore the two distinct effects (repetition effect and diffusion effect) of influencer endorsement on browsing and purchasing behavior and theorize about the moderate effects of discounts on these effects.
Q1

Leveraging platform-based technologies to mitigate product returns in E-commerce: an affordance actualization perspective
Zhou Y., Li H., Yin P.
PurposeThis study investigates how online sellers can leverage platform-based technologies to mitigate product returns through the lens of affordance actualization theory. We conceptualize four categories of platform-based technologies and theorize how their affordances influence consumer perceptions and behaviors, leading to reduced return rates.Design/methodology/approachWe develop a research model grounded in affordance actualization theory and test our hypotheses using a unique longitudinal dataset from a leading e-commerce platform. We employ panel data analysis with seller fixed effects and conduct various robustness checks to ensure the reliability of our findings. We also examine the synergistic effects among different platform-based technologies and explore their varying impacts across product types and seller characteristics.FindingsThe strategic actualization of pricing, marketing, product presentation and customer service technology affordances significantly reduces product return rates. The return-mitigating effects are stronger for low-reputation sellers and high-price, high-complexity products, highlighting the contingent value of technology affordances in managing returns. Besides, we find evidence of synergistic effects among different platform-based technologies, particularly for complex products and less reputable sellers.Originality/valueThis study extends affordance actualization theory to the e-commerce context and uncovers the mechanisms and boundary conditions for platform-based technologies to mitigate product returns. We contribute to the literature by offering a novel theoretical perspective and granular insights into the role of technology in shaping a critical operational outcome in online retailing.
Q1

Will rural collective construction land marketization affect pension industry? A mixed-methods investigation
Han L., Wu H., Fang B., Zhou W.
PurposeThis paper aims to study whether rural collective construction land marketization (RCCLM) affects pension industry and analyze its impact mechanism.Design/methodology/approachBased on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and social cognition theory (SCT), this paper constructs a theoretical framework for the purchase behavior of rural retirement housing with the influence of RCCLM. A mixed-methods investigation combining qualitative and quantitative study is adopted in this paper.FindingsThe research results indicate that the purchase intention of rural retirement housing has a significant positive impact on the purchase behavior. However, RCCLM has a significant negative impact on the purchase intention of rural retirement housing. A logical framework of “land system participant behavior” has been constructed from three main bodies: government, developers and elderly urban and rural residents.Practical implicationsThis paper provides suggestions for the three entities from the perspectives of macro, medium and micro-level to improve transaction system for rural collective construction land use right (TSRCCLUR), providing references for the collective construction land marketization policy and the development of the pension industry.Originality/valueThis paper deepens the study of behavior intention in planned behavior, enriches TPB model in the study of rural retirement housing security and clarifies the influence mechanism of the rural retirement housing purchase intention with the theoretical and empirical test of the model.
Q1

Supply chain resilience and soft organizational factors – a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review
Ahmed Q., Sumbal M.S., Lee C., Tsui E.
PurposeThe advent of a dynamic and uncertain environment has shifted organizational focus from reactive to proactive approaches to develop resilience against disruptions. Organizations can strengthen their supply chain networks through strategic changes in structure and processes. In this connection, this study explores the extant literature on supply chain resilience (SCRE) concerning soft organizational factors (leadership, organizational culture and knowledge management) to analyse recent trends in this domain and propose future research directions.Design/methodology/approachIt is a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of research articles from 2004 to 2024, collected from ISI Web of Science with keywords searches such as “knowledge management and supply chain resilience,” “leadership and supply chain resilience” and “organizational culture and supply chain resilience.” “VOS viewer” and “ATLAS.ti” were utilized for the co-occurrence and co-authorship analysis of the articles along with focusing on aspects such as theoretical and practical implications, the collaboration institutions and the countries involved in relation to the topic of interest.FindingsThe review shows that the development of studies on SCRE was slow from 2004 to 2015 but grew significantly from 2015 onwards and rose exponentially after 2020. Most studies were published in 2023. Results reveal the development of proactive strategies for SCRE in the recent literature by focusing on organizational factors. The study highlights exploring the contextual interplay between environmental, social and governance (ESG) and soft organizational factors for mitigation of supply chain risk and resilience in large-scale projects.Originality/valueThe COVID-19 pandemic became the precursor to highlighting the antecedents of SCRE, but the study of soft organizational drivers is still an ongoing area of research. There is a need to map the nascent literature on the link between organizational soft drivers and SCRE.
Q1

Building organizational agility through digital transformation: a configurational approach in SMEs
Pelletier C., L'Écuyer F., Raymond L.
PurposeThis study adopts a capability-based view to investigate the attainment of organizational agility in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It first explores how these firms mobilize different types of operational and dynamic information technology (IT) capabilities to achieve a high level of agility through their digital transformation. In return, it also reveals opposite paths, i.e. those leading to its absence.Design/methodology/approachThe research method involves a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 65 Canadian manufacturing SMEs. Through necessity and sufficiency condition analysis procedures, this approach emphasizes the complexity of the digital transformation processes by revealing different sets (i.e. configurations) of what enable, or inhibit, organizational agility in these firms.FindingsThe findings indicate that manufacturing SMEs need to align at least one dynamic IT capability (sensing, learning, coordinating or integrating) and one operational IT capability (IT management, IT infrastructure or e-business) to be highly agile. In contrast, other findings indicate that there are suboptimal combinations of IT capabilities, which result in an absence of agility.Originality/valueThis study offers a deeper understanding of the complex interaction of IT capabilities in SMEs seeking greater agility in their business activities. Its contributions provide insights on the mobilization of a range of capabilities, both complementary and interdependent, to respond to changing conditions in their internal and external environments. These actionable findings can help various actors in the digital development of SMEs to design and implement effective IT strategies and public policies.
Top-100
Citing journals
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
|
Freshwater Biology
22452 citations, 7.99%
|
|
Hydrobiologia
18702 citations, 6.66%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
8655 citations, 3.08%
|
|
Ecological Indicators
4852 citations, 1.73%
|
|
River Research and Applications
4114 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Freshwater Science
3873 citations, 1.38%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
3651 citations, 1.3%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
3552 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
3208 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Aquatic Sciences
2942 citations, 1.05%
|
|
PLoS ONE
2819 citations, 1%
|
|
Marine and Freshwater Research
2550 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Aquatic Ecology
2226 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Limnologica
2141 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
2055 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Oecologia
2040 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Ecohydrology
1788 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Journal of Fish Biology
1751 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Aquatic Botany
1729 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Journal of Great Lakes Research
1720 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Ecology
1677 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Ecology of Freshwater Fish
1646 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Water Resources Research
1589 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Ecology and Evolution
1561 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Biological Invasions
1561 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Global Change Biology
1558 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Scientific Reports
1517 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Water Research
1494 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Limnology and Oceanography
1493 citations, 0.53%
|
|
SIL Proceedings 1922-2010
1472 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Freshwater Ecology
1469 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Environmental Pollution
1431 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Ecosphere
1420 citations, 0.51%
|
|
International Review of Hydrobiology
1420 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
1412 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Ecological Engineering
1371 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
1348 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Hydrology
1336 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Plankton Research
1301 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of Paleolimnology
1217 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Ecological Applications
1174 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
1106 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Ecological Modelling
1102 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Ecosystems
1093 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Wetlands
1071 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Hydrological Processes
1046 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Environmental Management
993 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Oikos
987 citations, 0.35%
|
|
New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
907 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Environmental Biology of Fishes
895 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
847 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Biological Conservation
779 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
778 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Biological Reviews
752 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Biogeochemistry
748 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
740 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of the American Water Resources Association
727 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Ecography
722 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems
714 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Animal Ecology
704 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Diversity
696 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Environmental Science
688 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
679 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
668 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Applied Ecology
650 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Geomorphology
639 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Microbial Ecology
628 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Limnology
579 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Annales de Limnologie
578 citations, 0.21%
|
|
PeerJ
576 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Harmful Algae
573 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Biodiversity and Conservation
567 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Molecular Ecology
556 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Advances in Ecological Research
544 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Chemosphere
535 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Biogeography
525 citations, 0.19%
|
|
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
515 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Aquatic Toxicology
503 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Inland Waters
498 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Lake and Reservoir Management
495 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
495 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Diversity and Distributions
493 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sustainability
485 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
483 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
477 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution
468 citations, 0.17%
|
|
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
456 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Hupo Kexue/Journal of Lake Sciences
455 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Phycology
453 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Functional Ecology
434 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Regulated Rivers Research & Management
433 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Forest Ecology and Management
429 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Biologia (Poland)
421 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Aquaculture
419 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
418 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Austral Ecology
413 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Biogeosciences
412 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
410 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Fisheries Management and Ecology
408 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Landscape Ecology
405 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
Citing publishers
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
|
|
Wiley
76761 citations, 27.33%
|
|
Springer Nature
58168 citations, 20.71%
|
|
Elsevier
52923 citations, 18.84%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
11506 citations, 4.1%
|
|
MDPI
8576 citations, 3.05%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
7561 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
4750 citations, 1.69%
|
|
Oxford University Press
4224 citations, 1.5%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
3751 citations, 1.34%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3084 citations, 1.1%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
3043 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2030 citations, 0.72%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1837 citations, 0.65%
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
1726 citations, 0.61%
|
|
SciELO
1661 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1549 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Copernicus
1153 citations, 0.41%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1092 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1029 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
971 citations, 0.35%
|
|
The Royal Society
949 citations, 0.34%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
837 citations, 0.3%
|
|
PeerJ
691 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
665 citations, 0.24%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
632 citations, 0.23%
|
|
SAGE
631 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Freshwater Biological Association
626 citations, 0.22%
|
|
IOP Publishing
521 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
476 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Brill
459 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Humboldt Field Research Institute
437 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
414 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Annual Reviews
370 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
344 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IWA Publishing
341 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Freshwater Biological Association (BioOne sponsored)
327 citations, 0.12%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
298 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
268 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Magnolia Press
266 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
263 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
245 citations, 0.09%
|
|
University of Colorado
238 citations, 0.08%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
212 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
196 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
195 citations, 0.07%
|
|
190 citations, 0.07%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
189 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
182 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
181 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IOS Press
165 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
153 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Fundacao Zoobotanica do Rio Grande
152 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
151 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
145 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
133 citations, 0.05%
|
|
132 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
129 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Brigham Young University
117 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
115 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ecology and Civil Engineering Society
114 citations, 0.04%
|
|
102 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
100 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Shellfisheries Association, Inc.
99 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science Alert
89 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Water Environment Federation
84 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
82 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Society of Limnology
79 citations, 0.03%
|
|
77 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Washington State University Press
75 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Zoological Society of Japan
74 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation
73 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Herpetologists League
72 citations, 0.03%
|
|
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
71 citations, 0.03%
|
|
BioOne
71 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Southwestern Association of Naturalists
69 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
68 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ecological Society of China
67 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society on Water Environment
66 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Instituto de Tecnologia do Parana
65 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Royal Irish Academy
62 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Geological Society of London
59 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Western North American Naturalist
59 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board
54 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AIP Publishing
53 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Geological Society of America
52 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Malacology
50 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Soil Science Society of America
49 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
49 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Polish Academy of Sciences Chancellery
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academia Sinica
46 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Waterbird Society
46 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific
45 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
44 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonica
43 citations, 0.02%
|
|
OpenEdition
43 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institut National de la Research Scientifique
40 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
39 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Higher Education Press
39 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Ecological Society of Korea
39 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Aarhus University
118 publications, 1.71%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
99 publications, 1.43%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
93 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
89 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Griffith University
83 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Helsinki
77 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Netherlands Institute of Ecology
77 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Otago
76 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Lund University
73 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
73 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
65 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Liverpool
64 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Monash University
64 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Umeå University
63 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Virginia Tech
61 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Uppsala University
60 publications, 0.87%
|
|
National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research
60 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Finnish Environment Institute
58 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Washington
58 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Melbourne
56 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Oregon State University
56 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
55 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Michigan State University
54 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
54 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
53 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Toronto
53 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Barcelona
53 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Colorado State University
52 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Alabama
52 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University College London
48 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Canterbury
48 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
48 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Cardiff University
48 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Alberta
47 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
46 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Michigan
46 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
45 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
43 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Canberra
43 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Waterloo
42 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Dartmouth College
42 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Vienna
42 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Oslo
41 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Cornell University
39 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
39 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Birmingham
38 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Bangor University
38 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Oulu
37 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Minnesota
37 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Girona
37 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Utah State University
37 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
36 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of California, Davis
35 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of British Columbia
35 publications, 0.51%
|
|
ETH Zurich
34 publications, 0.49%
|
|
McGill University
34 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
33 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Konstanz
33 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Hokkaido University
33 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Windsor
33 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Federal University of Goiás
32 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Western Australia
31 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Rhodes University
31 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Arizona State University
31 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Lancaster University
31 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Loughborough University
30 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Natural Environment Research Council
30 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Centre for Ecological Research
29 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Doñana Biological Station
29 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
28 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Kansas State University
28 publications, 0.41%
|
|
La Trobe University
27 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
27 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
27 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
27 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Guelph
27 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
25 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Nottingham
25 publications, 0.36%
|
|
James Cook University
25 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
25 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
25 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Utrecht University
25 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
25 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of East Anglia
25 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Valencia
25 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
24 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Florida
24 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Université Clermont Auvergne
24 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Hull
24 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
23 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Newcastle University
23 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
23 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Miami University
23 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
22 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Drexel University
22 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Spanish National Museum of Natural Sciences
22 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Ghent University
21 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Murdoch University
21 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
21 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
21 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
22 publications, 2.69%
|
|
Aarhus University
20 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
19 publications, 2.32%
|
|
Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
15 publications, 1.83%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
14 publications, 1.71%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
14 publications, 1.71%
|
|
University of Helsinki
14 publications, 1.71%
|
|
Netherlands Institute of Ecology
14 publications, 1.71%
|
|
University of Alabama
14 publications, 1.71%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
13 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Virginia Tech
13 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Doñana Biological Station
13 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Umeå University
12 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
12 publications, 1.47%
|
|
University of Melbourne
12 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Griffith University
12 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Centre for Ecological Research
12 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
11 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Colorado State University
10 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Konstanz
10 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University
10 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Girona
10 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
9 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Environment and Climate Change Canada
9 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
8 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Toronto
8 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Barcelona
8 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Regina
8 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Windsor
8 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Mersin University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Uppsala University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Nanchang University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Finnish Environment Institute
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Hohai University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
La Trobe University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of California, Davis
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Kyoto University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
McGill University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Hokkaido University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Federal University of Goiás
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Utah State University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Bournemouth University
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
ETH Zurich
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Parma
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Western Australia
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Murdoch University
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Waterloo
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Spanish National Museum of Natural Sciences
6 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Institute of Biology Komi SC of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Lund University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Michigan State University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Cornell University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Canterbury
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Charles Darwin University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Clemson University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Washington
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Ohio State University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Michigan
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Minnesota
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
National Institute for Environmental Studies
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Federal University of Rio Grande
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Vienna
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Coimbra
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Texas A&M University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Université Clermont Auvergne
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Lorraine
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Bern
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Geneva
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Oulu
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Oslo
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Nottingham
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
National University of Singapore
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Loughborough University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Cawthron Institute
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Adelaide
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Rhodes University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Yunnan University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1810, 26.22%
USA
1810 publications, 26.22%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1041, 15.08%
United Kingdom
1041 publications, 15.08%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 556, 8.06%
Canada
556 publications, 8.06%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 447, 6.48%
Australia
447 publications, 6.48%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 432, 6.26%
Germany
432 publications, 6.26%
|
France
|
France, 417, 6.04%
France
417 publications, 6.04%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 285, 4.13%
Sweden
285 publications, 4.13%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 281, 4.07%
Spain
281 publications, 4.07%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 240, 3.48%
Denmark
240 publications, 3.48%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 230, 3.33%
Netherlands
230 publications, 3.33%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 229, 3.32%
New Zealand
229 publications, 3.32%
|
China
|
China, 192, 2.78%
China
192 publications, 2.78%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 187, 2.71%
Finland
187 publications, 2.71%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 176, 2.55%
Brazil
176 publications, 2.55%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 169, 2.45%
Switzerland
169 publications, 2.45%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 128, 1.85%
Japan
128 publications, 1.85%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 117, 1.7%
Italy
117 publications, 1.7%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 110, 1.59%
Norway
110 publications, 1.59%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 108, 1.56%
Belgium
108 publications, 1.56%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 107, 1.55%
Austria
107 publications, 1.55%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 68, 0.99%
South Africa
68 publications, 0.99%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 62, 0.9%
Portugal
62 publications, 0.9%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 58, 0.84%
Hungary
58 publications, 0.84%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 56, 0.81%
Poland
56 publications, 0.81%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 55, 0.8%
Czech Republic
55 publications, 0.8%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 49, 0.71%
Argentina
49 publications, 0.71%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 44, 0.64%
Russia
44 publications, 0.64%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 43, 0.62%
Ireland
43 publications, 0.62%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 42, 0.61%
Turkey
42 publications, 0.61%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 32, 0.46%
Israel
32 publications, 0.46%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 25, 0.36%
Mexico
25 publications, 0.36%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 23, 0.33%
Uruguay
23 publications, 0.33%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 22, 0.32%
Chile
22 publications, 0.32%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 19, 0.28%
Iceland
19 publications, 0.28%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 18, 0.26%
Slovenia
18 publications, 0.26%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 14, 0.2%
Romania
14 publications, 0.2%
|
India
|
India, 13, 0.19%
India
13 publications, 0.19%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 13, 0.19%
Ecuador
13 publications, 0.19%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 12, 0.17%
Estonia
12 publications, 0.17%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 12, 0.17%
Malaysia
12 publications, 0.17%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 11, 0.16%
Kenya
11 publications, 0.16%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 10, 0.14%
Greece
10 publications, 0.14%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 9, 0.13%
Lithuania
9 publications, 0.13%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 8, 0.12%
Bulgaria
8 publications, 0.12%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 8, 0.12%
Bolivia
8 publications, 0.12%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 8, 0.12%
Botswana
8 publications, 0.12%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 7, 0.1%
Colombia
7 publications, 0.1%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 0.1%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 0.1%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 0.1%
Singapore
7 publications, 0.1%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 7, 0.1%
Slovakia
7 publications, 0.1%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 6, 0.09%
Egypt
6 publications, 0.09%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 6, 0.09%
Iraq
6 publications, 0.09%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 6, 0.09%
Nigeria
6 publications, 0.09%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 6, 0.09%
Uganda
6 publications, 0.09%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 6, 0.09%
Croatia
6 publications, 0.09%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 6, 0.09%
Ethiopia
6 publications, 0.09%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 5, 0.07%
Belarus
5 publications, 0.07%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 0.07%
Indonesia
5 publications, 0.07%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 5, 0.07%
Peru
5 publications, 0.07%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 5, 0.07%
Philippines
5 publications, 0.07%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 0.06%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Greenland
|
Greenland, 4, 0.06%
Greenland
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 4, 0.06%
Zambia
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 4, 0.06%
Malawi
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 4, 0.06%
Puerto Rico
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 4, 0.06%
Senegal
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 4, 0.06%
Tanzania
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.04%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.04%
Iran
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 3, 0.04%
Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.04%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.03%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.03%
Ghana
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 2, 0.03%
Georgia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.03%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.03%
Costa Rica
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.03%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.03%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 2, 0.03%
Namibia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 2, 0.03%
Nepal
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Isle of Man
|
Isle of Man, 2, 0.03%
Isle of Man
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 2, 0.03%
Papua New Guinea
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.03%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 2, 0.03%
Sudan
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.03%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 2, 0.03%
Fiji
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 2, 0.03%
Montenegro
2 publications, 0.03%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 2, 0.03%
USSR
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.01%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.01%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.01%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bhutan
|
Bhutan, 1, 0.01%
Bhutan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.01%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 1, 0.01%
Cambodia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.01%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.01%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.01%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 1, 0.01%
Madagascar
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 1, 0.01%
Mali
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.01%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
USA
|
USA, 228, 27.87%
USA
228 publications, 27.87%
|
China
|
China, 87, 10.64%
China
87 publications, 10.64%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 81, 9.9%
Canada
81 publications, 9.9%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 68, 8.31%
United Kingdom
68 publications, 8.31%
|
France
|
France, 65, 7.95%
France
65 publications, 7.95%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 63, 7.7%
Germany
63 publications, 7.7%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 60, 7.33%
Australia
60 publications, 7.33%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 57, 6.97%
Spain
57 publications, 6.97%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 50, 6.11%
Brazil
50 publications, 6.11%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 43, 5.26%
Sweden
43 publications, 5.26%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 34, 4.16%
Finland
34 publications, 4.16%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 30, 3.67%
Denmark
30 publications, 3.67%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 29, 3.55%
Japan
29 publications, 3.55%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 25, 3.06%
Norway
25 publications, 3.06%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 24, 2.93%
Switzerland
24 publications, 2.93%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 20, 2.44%
Netherlands
20 publications, 2.44%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 18, 2.2%
Austria
18 publications, 2.2%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 18, 2.2%
Hungary
18 publications, 2.2%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 17, 2.08%
Russia
17 publications, 2.08%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 17, 2.08%
Italy
17 publications, 2.08%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 17, 2.08%
New Zealand
17 publications, 2.08%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 16, 1.96%
Czech Republic
16 publications, 1.96%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 15, 1.83%
Portugal
15 publications, 1.83%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 14, 1.71%
Turkey
14 publications, 1.71%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 13, 1.59%
Poland
13 publications, 1.59%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 11, 1.34%
Belgium
11 publications, 1.34%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 11, 1.34%
South Africa
11 publications, 1.34%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 8, 0.98%
Mexico
8 publications, 0.98%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 7, 0.86%
Chile
7 publications, 0.86%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 6, 0.73%
Argentina
6 publications, 0.73%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 6, 0.73%
Iceland
6 publications, 0.73%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 6, 0.73%
Malaysia
6 publications, 0.73%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.61%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.61%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.49%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 4, 0.49%
Lithuania
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.49%
Romania
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 0.49%
Singapore
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 4, 0.49%
Uruguay
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 3, 0.37%
Estonia
3 publications, 0.37%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 3, 0.37%
Bangladesh
3 publications, 0.37%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.37%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.37%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.37%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.37%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.24%
Israel
2 publications, 0.24%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.24%
India
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.24%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.24%
Iran
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.24%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.24%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.24%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.24%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.24%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.24%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.12%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.12%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.12%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.12%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.12%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.12%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.12%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.12%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.12%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.12%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.12%
Peru
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.12%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.12%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.12%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.12%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.12%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.12%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.12%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.12%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Show all (41 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
3 profile journal articles
Steinberg Christian

Humboldt University of Berlin

Kunming University of Science and Technology
267 publications,
11 440 citations
h-index: 53
3 profile journal articles
Martyniuk Nicolas
PhD in Biological/biomedical sciences, Lecturer
19 publications,
177 citations
h-index: 7
Research interests
Biochemistry
2 profile journal articles
Maszczyk Piotr
62 publications,
651 citations
h-index: 16
1 profile journal article
Wanek Wolfgang

University of Vienna
302 publications,
13 640 citations
h-index: 60
1 profile journal article
Jean Stéphane
🥼 🤝
118 publications,
2 893 citations
h-index: 31