Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
1.1
SJR
0.365
CiteScore
2.9
Categories
History and Philosophy of Science
Philosophy
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Sociology and Political Science
Management of Technology and Innovation
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Areas
Arts and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2007-2025
journal names
NanoEthics
Top-3 citing journals

NanoEthics
(706 citations)

Journal of Responsible Innovation
(183 citations)

Science and Engineering Ethics
(143 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
(41 publications)

University of Twente
(19 publications)

Delft University of Technology
(11 publications)

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
(8 publications)

Technical University of Munich
(4 publications)

Delft University of Technology
(3 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1693
Q1

Magnetohydrodynamics in liquid metal interfacial flows
Ni M., Yang J., Zhang D.J.
Abstract
Liquid metal interfacial flows occur in the fields of nuclear fusion and electromagnetic metallurgy. Due to the electrically conductive characteristics of the liquid metal, the presence of magnetic fields in these application scenarios has significant impacts on the interfacial flow behaviors. Then typical interfacial flows under the influence of magnetic fields, such as the free surface liquid metal flow, the liquid metal droplet impacting problems, and the bubble motion in liquid metal, are discussed in the present review. We comprehensively illustrate the flow characteristics of free surface liquid metal flow, the spreading of liquid metal droplets impacting onto solid or liquid surfaces, outcomes of collisions between metal droplets, and bubble dynamics in liquid metal, under the influence of magnetic fields along different directions. Meanwhile, we briefly review the current concepts of liquid metal free surface flow for the plasma facing comonents (PFCs) in fusion reactors and finally make a summary for the open questions related to the fundamental research and industrial applications of interfacial flow magnetohydrodynamics in the future.
Q1

Size-Dependent Effects and Surface Roughness in Contact Mechanics
Li C., Liang X., Yuan W., Ding Y., Wang G.
Abstract
With the increasing miniaturization of mechanical systems and the prevalence of rough surfaces in engineering applications, understanding and accurately characterizing the contact response at small scales has become crucial. This review article provides a comprehensive analysis of two significant aspects in the field of contact mechanics: the size-dependent response of single asperity due to strain gradients and surface effects, and the contact behavior of rough surfaces. The former forms the foundation for the latter analysis, as real surfaces are inherently rough and contact occurs at discrete asperities. At the microscale, strain gradients play a dominant role, as classical continuum mechanics fails to account for the intrinsic material length. Further downscaling to the nanoscale highlights the importance of surface effects due to the large surface-to-bulk ratio. The first section examines these distinct size-dependent effects and their implications for contact mechanics across different scales. The second section further focuses on the contact of rough surfaces, highlighting incremental contact models, contact behavior at large contact fraction where asperity interactions are significant, adhesive rough contact in soft materials, and experimental advances that improve the understanding and validation of these models. Together, these two topics underscore the need for refined theoretical and experimental approaches to accurately model and predict the contact behavior at small scales and with realistic multi-scale roughness.
Q1

Mechanical Properties Inside Origami-Inspired Structures: An Overview
Yan P., Huang H., Meloni M., Li B., Cai J.
Abstract
In recent decades, origami has transitioned from a traditional art form into a systematic field of scientific inquiry, characterized by attributes such as high foldability, lightweight frameworks, diverse deformation modes, and limited degrees-of-freedom. Despite the abundant literature on smart materials, actuation methods, design principles, and manufacturing techniques, comprehensive reviews focusing on the mechanical properties of origami-inspired structures are relatively rare and unsystematic. This review aims to fill this void by analyzing and summarizing the significant studies conducted on the mechanical properties of origami-inspired structures from 2013 to 2023. We begin with an overview that includes essential definitions of origami, classical origami patterns, and their associated tessellated or stacked structures. Following this, we delve into the principal dynamic modeling method for origami and conduct an in-depth analysis of the key mechanical properties of origami-inspired structures. These properties include tunable stiffness, bistability and multistability, metamechanical properties demonstrated by origami-based metamaterials, and bio-inspired mechanical properties. Finally, we conclude with a comprehensive summary that discusses the current challenges and future directions in the field of origami-inspired structures. Our review provides a thorough synthesis of both the mechanical properties and practical applications of origami-inspired structures, aiming to serve as a reference and stimulate further research.
Q1

Reduced and All-at-Once Approaches for Model Calibration and Discovery in Computational Solid Mechanics
Römer U., Hartmann S., Tröger J., Anton D., Wessels H., Flaschel M., De Lorenzis L.
Abstract
In the framework of solid mechanics, the task of deriving material parameters from experimental data has recently re-emerged with the progress in full-field measurement capabilities and the renewed advances of machine learning. In this context, new methods such as the virtual fields method and physics-informed neural networks have been developed as alternatives to the already established least-squares and finite element-based approaches. Moreover, model discovery problems are emerging and can also be addressed in a parameter estimation framework.
These developments call for a new unified perspective, which is able to cover both traditional parameter estimation methods and novel approaches in which the state variables or the model structure itself are inferred as well.
Adopting concepts discussed in the inverse problems community, we distinguish between all-at-once and reduced approaches. With this general framework, we are able to structure a large portion of the literature on parameter estimation in computational mechanics -- and we can identify combinations that have not yet been addressed, two of which are proposed in this paper.
We also discuss statistical approaches to quantify the uncertainty related to the estimated parameters, and we propose a novel two-step procedure for identification of complex material models based on both frequentist and Bayesian principles.
Finally, we illustrate and compare several of the aforementioned methods with mechanical benchmarks based on synthetic and experimental data.
Q1

Fracture Mechanics of Magnetoelectroelastic Materials and Structures: State of the Art and Prospects
Feng W., Yan Z., Ma P., Lv C., Zhang C.
Abstract
Magnetoelectroelastic (MEE) materials and structures have been extensively applied in MEE devices such as sensors and transducers, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and smart structures. In order to assess the strength and durability of such materials and structures, exhaustive theoretical and numerical investigations have been conducted over the past two decades. The main purpose of this paper is to present a state-of-the-art review and a critical discussion on the research of the MEE fracture mechanics. Following an introduction, the basic theory of the fracture mechanics in the linear magnetoelectroelasticity is explained with special emphasis on the constitutive equations related to different fracture modes, magnetoelectrical (ME) crack-face boundary conditions and fracture parameters for 2D plane problems. Then, the state of the art of the research on the fracture mechanics of the MEE materials and structures is reviewed and summarized, including 2D anti-plane and in-plane as well as 3D analyses under both static and dynamic loadings. The ME effects on the fracture parameters are revealed and discussed. Moreover, numerical investigations based on the finite element method (FEM), boundary element method (BEM), meshless methods and other novel methods are also reviewed for MEE fracture problems. Finally, some conclusions are drawn with several prospects to open questions and demanding future research topics. In particular, experimental observations are urgently needed to verify the validity of the theoretical predictions of the various fracture criteria. Another great challenge is to tackle the non-linear phenomena and domain switching in the fracture process zone.
Q1

Statistical Scaling in Localization-Induced Failures
Le J.
Abstract
The investigation of statistical scaling in localization-induced failures dates back to da Vinci's speculation on the length effect on rope strength in 1500 s. The early mathematical description of statistical scaling emerged with the birth of the extreme value statistics. The most commonly known mathematical model for statistical scaling is the Weibull size effect, which is a direct consequence of the infinite weakest-link model. However, abundant experimental observations on various localization-induced failures have shown that the Weibull size effect is inadequate. Over the last two decades, two mathematical models were developed to describe the statistical size effect in localization-induced failures. One is the finite weakest-link model, in which the random structural resistance is expressed as the minimum of a set of independent discrete random variables. The other is the level excursion model, a continuum description of the finite weakest-link model, in which the structural failure probability is calculated as the probability of the upcrossing of a random field over a barrier. This paper reviews the mathematical formulation of these two models and their applications to various engineering problems including the strength distributions of quasi-brittle structures, failure statistics of micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) devices, breakdown statistics of high– k gate dielectrics, and probability distribution of buckling pressure of spherical shells containing random geometric imperfections. In addition, the implications of statistical scaling for the stochastic finite element simulations and the reliability-based structural design are discussed. In particular, the recent development of the size-dependent safety factors is reviewed.
Q1

Nonlinear Normal Modes of Vibrating Mechanical Systems: 10 Years of Progress
Mikhlin Y., Avramov K.V.
Abstract
This paper contains review of the theory and applications of nonlinear normal modes, which are developed during last decade. This review has more than 200 references. It is a continuation of two previous review papers of the same authors (Mikhlin Y.V., Avramov K.V.: Nonlinear normal modes for vibrating mechanical systems. Review of Theoretical Developments. Appl. Mech. Rev. 63, 060802 (2010); Avramov, K.V., Mikhlin, Yu.V.: Review of applications of nonlinear normal modes for vibrating mechanical systems. Appl. Mech. Rev. 65, 020801 (2013)). The following theoretical issues of nonlinear normal modes are treated: basic concepts and definitions; application of the normal forms theory for nonlinear modes construction; nonlinear modes in finite degrees of freedom systems; resonances and bifurcations; reduced-order modelling; nonlinear modes in stochastic dynamical systems; numerical methods; identification of mechanical systems using nonlinear modes. The following applied issues of this theory are treated in this review: experimental measurement of nonlinear modes; nonlinear modes in continuous systems; engineering applications (aerospace engineering, power engineering, piecewise-linear systems and structures with dry friction); nonlinear modes in nanostructures and physical systems; targeted energy transfer and absorption problem.
Q1

A Comprehensive Review of Indentation of Gels and Soft Biological Materials
He D., Malu D., Hu Y.
Abstract
Indentation measurement has emerged as a widely adapted technique for elucidating the mechanical properties of soft hydrated materials. These materials, encompassing gels, cells, and biological tissues, possess pivotal mechanical characteristics crucial for a myriad of applications across engineering and biological realms. From engineering endeavors to biological processes linked to both normal physiological activity and pathological conditions, understanding the mechanical behavior of soft hydrated materials is paramount. The indentation method is particularly suitable for accessing the mechanical properties of these materials as it offers the ability to conduct assessments in liquid environment across diverse length and time scales with minimal sample preparation. Nonetheless, understanding the physical principles underpinning indentation testing and the corresponding contact mechanics theories, making judicious choices regarding indentation testing methods and associated experimental parameters, and accurately interpreting the experimental results are challenging tasks. In this review, we delve into the methodology and applications of indentation in assessing the mechanical properties of soft hydrated materials, spanning elastic, viscoelastic, poroelastic, coupled viscoporoelastic, and adhesion properties, as well as fracture toughness. Each category is accomplished by the theoretical models elucidating underlying physics, followed by ensuring discussions on experimental setup requirements. Furthermore, we consolidate recent advancements in indentation measurements for soft hydrated materials highlighting its multifaceted applications. Looking forward, we offer insights into the future trajectory of the indentation method on soft hydrated materials and the potential applications. This comprehensive review aims to furnish readers with a profound understanding of indentation techniques and a pragmatic roadmap of characterizing the mechanical properties of soft hydrated materials.
Q1

Acoustic Emission in Ceramic Matrix Composites
Tulshibagwale N., Brodnik N., Muir C., Hilmas A., Kiser J., Smith C., Almansour A., Presby M., Daly S.H.
Abstract
The integration of ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) into safety-critical applications, such as turbine engines and aerospace structures, necessitates a sound understanding of their expected damage evolution under in-service conditions and real-time health-monitoring methods to assess their damage state. The measurement of acoustic emissions (AEs), the transient elastic waves emitted during damage formation, offers an enhanced capability for evaluating damage evolution and structural health in CMCs due to its high sensitivity, accurate temporal resolution, and relative ease of use compared to other nondestructive evaluation (NDE) techniques. Recent advances in numerical simulation methods and data-driven model development, in combination with improved multimodal experimental characterization methods and sensor hardware, are rapidly advancing AE to a mature technique for damage quantification. This review discusses the fundamental principles of acoustic emissions, provides practical guidelines on their experimental characterization and analysis, and offers perspectives on the current state-of-the-art.
Q1

MechGPT, a Language-Based Strategy for Mechanics and Materials Modeling That Connects Knowledge Across Scales, Disciplines and Modalities
Buehler M.J.
Abstract
For centuries, researchers have sought out ways to connect disparate areas of knowledge. While early scholars (Galileo, da Vinci, etc.) were experts across fields, specialization has taken hold later. With the advent of Artificial Intelligence, we can now explore relationships across areas (e.g., mechanics-biology) or disparate domains (e.g., failure mechanics-art). To achieve this, we use a fine-tuned Large Language Model (LLM), here for a subset of knowledge in multiscale materials failure. The approach includes the use of a general-purpose LLM to distill question-answer pairs from raw sources followed by LLM fine-tuning. The resulting MechGPT LLM foundation model is used in a series of computational experiments to explore its capacity for knowledge retrieval, various language tasks, hypothesis generation, and connecting knowledge across disparate areas. While the model has some ability to recall knowledge from training, we find that LLMs are particularly useful to extract structural insights through Ontological Knowledge Graphs. These interpretable graph structures provide explanatory insights, frameworks for new research questions, and visual representations of knowledge that also can be used in retrieval-augmented generation. Three versions of MechGPT are discussed, featuring different sizes from 13 billion to 70 billion parameters, and reaching context lengths of more than 10,000 tokens. This provides ample capacity for sophisticated retrieval augmented strategies, as well as agent-based modeling where multiple LLMs interact collaboratively and/or adversarially, the incorporation of new data from the literature or web searches, as well as multimodality.
Q1

Thermo-Hydro-Chemo-Mechanical (THCM) Continuum Modelling of Subsurface Rocks: A Focus On Thermodynamics-based Constitutive Models
Siddiqui M.A., Regenauer-Lieb K., Roshan H.
Abstract
Accurate multi-physics modelling is necessary to simulate and predict the long-term behaviour of subsurface porous rocks. Despite decades of modelling subsurface multi-physics processes in porous rocks, there are still considerable uncertainties and challenges remaining partly because of the way the constitutive equations describing such processes are derived (thermodynamically or phenomenologically) and treated (continuum or discrete) regardless of the way they are solved (e.g. finite-element or finite-volume methods). We review here continuum multi-physics models covering aspects of poromechanics, chemo-poromechanics, thermo-poromechanics, and thermo-chemo-poromechanics. We focus on models that are derived based on thermodynamics to signify the importance of such a basis and discuss the limitations of the phenomenological models and how thermodynamics-based modelling can overcome such limitations. The review highlights that the experimental determination of thermodynamics response coefficients (coupling or constitutive coefficients) and field applicability of the developed thermodynamics models are significant research gaps to be addressed. Verification and validation of the constitutive models, preferably through physical experiments, is yet to be comprehensively realized which is further discussed in this review. The review also shows the versatility of the multi-physics models to address issues from shale gas production to CO2 sequestration and energy storage and highlights the need for inclusion of thermodynamically consistent damage mechanics, coupling of chemical and mechanical damage and two-phase fluid flow in multi-physics models.
Q1

Multi-body Hydrodynamic Interactions in Fish-like Swimming
Timm M., Pandhare R., Masoud H.
Abstract
Many animals in nature travel in groups either for protection, survival, or endurance. Among these, certain species do so under the burden of aero/hydrodynamic loads, which incites questions as to the significance of the multibody fluid-mediated interactions that are inherent to collective flying/swimming. Prime examples of such creatures are fish, which are commonly seen traveling in highly organized groups of large numbers. Indeed, over the years, there have been numerous attempts to examine hydrodynamic interactions among self-propelled fish-like swimmers. Though many have studied this phenomenon, their motivations have varied from understanding animal behavior to extracting universal fluid dynamical principles and transplanting them into engineering applications. The approaches utilized to carry out these investigations include theoretical and computational analyses, field observations, and experiments using various abstractions of biological fish. Here, we compile representative investigations focused on the collective hydrodynamics of fish-like swimmers. The selected body of works are reviewed in the context of their methodologies and findings, so as to draw parallels, contrast differences, and highlight open questions. Overall, the results of the surveyed studies provide foundational insights into the conditions (such as the relative positioning and synchronization between the members, as well as their swimming kinematics and speed) under which hydrodynamic interactions can lead to efficiency gains and/or group cohesion in two- and three-dimensional scenarios. They also shed some light on the mechanisms responsible for such energetic and stability enhancements in the context of wake-body, wake-wake, and body-body interactions.
Q1

A Comprehensive Review On the Novel Principles, Development and Applications of Triboelectric Nanogenerators
Hurdoganoglu D., Safaei B., Cheng J., Qin Z., Sahmani S.
Abstract
The primary objective of this research is to present a comprehensive discussion on the fundamental concepts, innovations, and applications of triboelectric nanogenerators. It describes the various triboelectric nanogenerators' modes and mechanisms. Here, materials and associated development that exhibit triboelectric properties are also examined. Additionally, various triboelectric nanogenerator applications have been discussed. Triboelectric nanogenerators, a revolutionary power generation technology, were introduced in 2012 and are characterized as devices that efficiently generate electrical energy from kinetic energy in the environment. The development of triboelectric nanogenerators has advanced significantly since the invention of this innovative power-generation technology. Moreover, in order to provide a deeper understanding of the technology, the modes include Freestanding Triboelectric-Layer, Single-Electrode, Lateral Sliding, and Vertical Contact-Separation Modes as well as their operating mechanism have been thoroughly examined. Likewise, this study describes and offers concepts for future research on the important applications of TENGs, including high voltage power supply, blue energy, self-power sensors, and micro/nano energy. In conclusion, triboelectric nanogenerator is a crucial and alluring technology with the benefits of low cost, simple structure, easy fabrication, high efficiency, and relatively high output energy. Since a broad range of materials can be adopted, scientists can apply this cutting-edge technology in novel ways. For a more comprehensive understanding of this innovative and ground-breaking technology, numerous fundamental scientific considerations and limitations are also addressed.
Q1

Recent Advances and Applications of Machine Learning in Experimental Solid Mechanics: A Review
Jin H., Zhang E., Espinosa H.D.
Abstract
For many decades, experimental solid mechanics has played a crucial role in characterizing and understanding the mechanical properties of natural and novel artificial materials. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) provide new opportunities for the field, including experimental design, data analysis, uncertainty quantification, and inverse problems. As the number of papers published in recent years in this emerging field is growing exponentially, it is timely to conduct a comprehensive and up-to-date review of recent ML applications in experimental solid mechanics. Here, we first provide an overview of common ML algorithms and terminologies that are pertinent to this review, with emphasis placed on physics-informed and physics-based ML methods. Then, we provide thorough coverage of recent ML applications in traditional and emerging areas of experimental mechanics, including fracture mechanics, biomechanics, nano- and micromechanics, architected materials, and two-dimensional materials. Finally, we highlight some current challenges of applying ML to multimodality and multifidelity experimental datasets, quantifying the uncertainty of ML predictions, and proposing several future research directions. This review aims to provide valuable insights into the use of ML methods and a variety of examples for researchers in solid mechanics to integrate into their experiments.
Q1

Krylov Methods for Large-Scale Dynamical Systems: Application in Fluid Dynamics
Frantz R.A., Loiseau J., Robinet J.
Abstract
The ability to predict and characterize bifurcations from the onset of unsteadiness to the transition to turbulence is of critical importance in both academic and industrial applications. Numerous tools from dynamical system theory can be employed for that purpose. In this review, we focus on the practical computation and stability analyses of steady and time-periodic solutions with a particular emphasis on very high-dimensional systems such as those resulting from the discrete Navier-Stokes equations. In addition to a didactically concise theoretical framework, we introduce nekStab, an open source and user-friendly toolbox dedicated to such analyses using the spectral element solver Nek5000. Relying on Krylov methods and a time-stepper formulation, nekStab inherits the flexibility and high performance capabilities of Nek5000 and can be used to study the stability properties of flows in complex three-dimensional geometries. The performances and accuracy of nekStab are presented on the basis of standard benchmarks from the literature. For the sake of pedagogy and clarity, most of the algorithms implemented in nekStab are presented herein using Python pseudocode. Because of its flexibility and domain-agnostic nature, the methodology presented in this work can be applied to develop similar toolboxes for other solvers, most importantly outside the field of fluid dynamics.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
NanoEthics
706 citations, 13.13%
|
|
Journal of Responsible Innovation
183 citations, 3.4%
|
|
Science and Engineering Ethics
143 citations, 2.66%
|
|
Futures
64 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Technology in Society
53 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Science and Public Policy
51 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Journal of Nanoparticle Research
47 citations, 0.87%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
40 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Philosophy and Technology
35 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
35 citations, 0.65%
|
|
The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology
34 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Life Sciences, Society and Policy
33 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Public Understanding of Science
31 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
29 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Nature Nanotechnology
27 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
25 citations, 0.46%
|
|
International Journal of Technoethics
23 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Science Communication
23 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
22 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Sustainability
21 citations, 0.39%
|
|
The Capability Approach, Technology and Design
21 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Science as Culture
20 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
20 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Science Technology and Human Values
20 citations, 0.37%
|
|
NanoImpact
20 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Research Policy
20 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
18 citations, 0.33%
|
|
AJOB Neuroscience
17 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
17 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Social Studies of Science
15 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Medical Ethics
15 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
15 citations, 0.28%
|
|
AI and Ethics
15 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Review of Policy Research
14 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Journal of Bioethics
14 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
European Journal of Futures Research
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Risk Research
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Ethics and Information Technology
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Neuroethics
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics
13 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nanomaterials
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Energy Research and Social Science
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Risk Analysis
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
AI and Society
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Social Epistemology
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Philosophy of Management
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
BioSocieties
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nanomedicine
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Trends in Food Science and Technology
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Minerva
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Materials
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
EMBO Reports
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
BMC Medical Ethics
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Nanotoxicology
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Responsible Technology
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
The Social Process of Scientific Investigation
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Emotional Machines
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Psychology and Marketing
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Environment Systems and Decisions
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Ethics, Policy and Environment
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
ACS Nano
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Social Robotics
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Inquiry (United Kingdom)
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Monash bioethics review
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Agriculture and Human Values
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Environmental Science: Nano
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Contemporary Approaches to Activity Theory
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Regulation and Governance
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal on Chain and Network Science
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Configurações
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
European Research on Management and Business Economics
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
RSC Advances
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Quantum Science and Technology
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
New Technology, Work and Employment
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Safety Science
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Geoforum
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
British Food Journal
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Elementa
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Springer Nature
1749 citations, 32.53%
|
|
Elsevier
623 citations, 11.59%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
526 citations, 9.78%
|
|
Wiley
257 citations, 4.78%
|
|
SAGE
188 citations, 3.5%
|
|
MDPI
172 citations, 3.2%
|
|
IGI Global
100 citations, 1.86%
|
|
Oxford University Press
87 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
83 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
78 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
71 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Emerald
53 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
39 citations, 0.73%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
34 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
25 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
25 citations, 0.46%
|
|
IOP Publishing
24 citations, 0.45%
|
|
BMJ
21 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
15 citations, 0.28%
|
|
SciELO
12 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
11 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
OpenEdition
10 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
9 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
8 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IOS Press
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
The Royal Society
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Wageningen Academic Publishers
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
CAIRN
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
7 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AIP Publishing
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
MIT Press
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Portland Press
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Oekom Publishers
6 citations, 0.11%
|
|
University of California Press
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Bristol University Press
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
EDP Sciences
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Physiological Society
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Editions E D K
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Duke University Press
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
King Saud University
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
F1000 Research
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
World Scientific
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Brill
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Corporacion Universitaria Lasallista
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Pluto Journals
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Korean Vacuum Society
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Berghahn Books
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Modestum Ltd
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Editora Edgard Blucher, Ltda.
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Accounting Association
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Nephrology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Zhejiang University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
World Health Organization
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Europe of Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Institut za Istrazivanja I Projektovanja u Privredi
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Instytut Filozofii UJ
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Volgograd State University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
National Biological Information Infrastructure
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Centro de estudos sociais
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
41 publications, 9.09%
|
|
University of Twente
19 publications, 4.21%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
11 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Arizona State University
11 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
10 publications, 2.22%
|
|
University of Padua
9 publications, 2%
|
|
Monash University
9 publications, 2%
|
|
University of Bergen
8 publications, 1.77%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
7 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Australian National University
7 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 1.55%
|
|
University of Vienna
7 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
6 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Maastricht University
6 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
6 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
5 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Basel
5 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Aarhus University
5 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Cornell University
5 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Trieste
5 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Stanford University
5 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt
5 publications, 1.11%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Zurich
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Durham University
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Michigan State University
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Canberra
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of the West of England
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Cardiff University
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University Medical Center Göttingen
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Konstanz
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Colorado School of Mines
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Calgary
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Tehran
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Kufa
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Heidelberg University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of New South Wales
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Renmin University of China
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Turin
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Warwick
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Cambridge
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Oslo
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Salerno
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Queensland
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Wollongong
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Cape Town
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
North Carolina State University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Paris Cité University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Western Michigan University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
McGill University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Utrecht University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Leiden University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Munich University of Applied Sciences
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Institute of Technology Assessment of the Austrian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Coimbra
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
York University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Exeter
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Pasteur Institute of Iran
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Ozyegin University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Hyderabad
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Eskisehir Osmangazi University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Necmettin Erbakan University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Tübingen
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Allahabad
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
8 publications, 7.69%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
4 publications, 3.85%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
3 publications, 2.88%
|
|
University of the West of England
3 publications, 2.88%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
3 publications, 2.88%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
3 publications, 2.88%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
3 publications, 2.88%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Twente
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Basel
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Renmin University of China
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Warwick
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Paris Cité University
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
McGill University
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Konstanz
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Munich University of Applied Sciences
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Colorado School of Mines
2 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Tehran
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Ozyegin University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Eskisehir Osmangazi University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Necmettin Erbakan University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Geneva
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Shanghai Normal University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Sorbonne University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Trieste
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Australian Research Council
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
North Carolina State University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of California, Davis
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos"
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Bristol
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Fraunhofer Center for International Management and Knowledge Economy
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University Medical Center Freiburg
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Hamburg University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Leiden University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Hagen
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Calgary
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Ramon Llull University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Texas A&M University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Université de Lille
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Babes-Bolyai University
1 publication, 0.96%
|
|
Show all (50 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
Germany
|
Germany, 95, 21.06%
Germany
95 publications, 21.06%
|
USA
|
USA, 78, 17.29%
USA
78 publications, 17.29%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 60, 13.3%
Netherlands
60 publications, 13.3%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 42, 9.31%
Australia
42 publications, 9.31%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 37, 8.2%
United Kingdom
37 publications, 8.2%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 28, 6.21%
Italy
28 publications, 6.21%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 22, 4.88%
Norway
22 publications, 4.88%
|
France
|
France, 20, 4.43%
France
20 publications, 4.43%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 15, 3.33%
Switzerland
15 publications, 3.33%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 13, 2.88%
Austria
13 publications, 2.88%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 13, 2.88%
Belgium
13 publications, 2.88%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 12, 2.66%
Denmark
12 publications, 2.66%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 11, 2.44%
Sweden
11 publications, 2.44%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 10, 2.22%
Canada
10 publications, 2.22%
|
China
|
China, 8, 1.77%
China
8 publications, 1.77%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 8, 1.77%
Spain
8 publications, 1.77%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 8, 1.77%
Turkey
8 publications, 1.77%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 6, 1.33%
Portugal
6 publications, 1.33%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 6, 1.33%
Brazil
6 publications, 1.33%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 1.11%
Ireland
5 publications, 1.11%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.89%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.89%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.89%
Poland
4 publications, 0.89%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.67%
India
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.67%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 0.67%
Thailand
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.44%
Israel
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.44%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.44%
Iran
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.44%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.44%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.44%
Chile
2 publications, 0.44%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.44%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.22%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.22%
Benin
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.22%
Greece
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.22%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.22%
Romania
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.22%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.22%
Finland
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Show all (9 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Germany
|
Germany, 28, 26.92%
Germany
28 publications, 26.92%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 16, 15.38%
Netherlands
16 publications, 15.38%
|
USA
|
USA, 12, 11.54%
USA
12 publications, 11.54%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 12, 11.54%
United Kingdom
12 publications, 11.54%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 8, 7.69%
Turkey
8 publications, 7.69%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 7, 6.73%
Switzerland
7 publications, 6.73%
|
France
|
France, 6, 5.77%
France
6 publications, 5.77%
|
China
|
China, 5, 4.81%
China
5 publications, 4.81%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 4.81%
Sweden
5 publications, 4.81%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 3.85%
Poland
4 publications, 3.85%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 2.88%
Australia
3 publications, 2.88%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 2.88%
Belgium
3 publications, 2.88%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 3, 2.88%
Spain
3 publications, 2.88%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 2.88%
Italy
3 publications, 2.88%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 1.92%
Ireland
2 publications, 1.92%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 1.92%
Malaysia
2 publications, 1.92%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.96%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.96%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.96%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.96%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.96%
Austria
1 publication, 0.96%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.96%
Greece
1 publication, 0.96%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.96%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.96%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.96%
Iran
1 publication, 0.96%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1, 0.96%
Canada
1 publication, 0.96%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.96%
Romania
1 publication, 0.96%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.96%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.96%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.96%
Finland
1 publication, 0.96%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|