Open Access
Life Sciences, Society and Policy
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
SJR
0.547
Categories
Philosophy
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Areas
Arts and Humanities
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Environmental Science
Years of issue
2013-2021
journal names
Life Sciences, Society and Policy
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Responsible Innovation
(61 citations)

Life Sciences, Society and Policy
(49 citations)

NanoEthics
(41 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Radboud University Nijmegen
(11 publications)

University of Oxford
(7 publications)

Wageningen University and Research Centre
(6 publications)

Oslo Metropolitan University
(2 publications)

Shiraz University
(2 publications)

Wageningen University and Research Centre
(2 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 176
Q4

Mobile-First Usability Guideline for Responsive E-Commerce Websites
Kumar B.A.
Handheld devices such as smartphones, tablets, and PDAs are commonly used for online shopping. In order to satisfy web page requests on these devices, web developers are using a responsive web design approach, where websites dynamically adapt to different screen sizes and orientations. One of the challenges faced by web developers is to provide a usable experience across different devices. Motivated by this, a mobile-first usability guideline was established by extracting good usability practices from five popular responsive e-commerce websites. Validation of the usability guideline was conducted, and results indicate that it will have a positive impact on the overall user experience.
Q4

Challenges and Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking in Qatar
Alsalem A., Abu-Shanab E.A.
The evolution of the Internet and smartphones, people are able to use Internet banking (IB). In addition, banks are able to reduce their operational costs and attract more customers when utilizing IB. The Covid-19 Virus outbreak in encouraged clients to use IB to limit their physical interactions with others. This research utilized the extended Unified Theory for Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT-II) to assess how bank customers adopt IB. 375 online surveys were collected to test eight hypotheses. Results indicated that Performance Expectancy, Social Influence, Security, and Habit were significant predictors of the behavioral intentions to use IB, while Effort Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions, Perceived Value, were insignificant. Age was used as a moderator to habit-behavioral intentions relationship, but data failed to support its role. The overall coefficient of determination was 0.86, which exceeded the original model. Further discussions and conclusions are reported at the end of the paper.
Q4

Squiride Rank
Sankpal L.J., Patil S.H.
The proposed SquiRide Rank algorithm is designed by integrating the Squirrel Search Algorithm (SSA) with the Rider Optimization Algorithm (ROA), respectively. The concept of fictional computing and the foraging behavior realize the re-ranking process more effectively in the web environment. However, the features extracted from the web pages makes the process more effective and achieve global optimal solution through the fitness measure. The proposed SquiRide Rank algorithm effectively captures and analyzes the ranking scores of different search engines in order to generate the re-ranked score result. However, the proposed SquiRide Rank algorithm provides satisfactory results using the metrics, like precision, recall, and F-measure, which acquired with the values of 0.964, 0.996, and 0.980, respectively.
Q4

Security Framework for Tuberculosis Health Data Interoperability Through the Semantic Web
Lima V.C., Pellison F.C., Bernardi F.A., Alves D., Rijo R.P.
One of the critical challenges in health information systems is interoperability. The clinical, strategic, and operational decision depends on quality data and the ability to exchange data inter-systems and inter-health organizations. The Semantic Web plays a cornerstone role as a technology to enable functional and semantic interoperability without substantial changes in existing systems and to improve data sharing capabilities and, consequently, its quality and completeness. However, a common concern is data security. In this context, this research proposes a framework for securing health data, with a real case scenario focused on tuberculosis data exchange over the Semantic Web. The needs of security for the Semantic Web were satisfied, helping to build trust in the data and promoting its use in contexts that were not initially created to openly disseminate data without a significant technological apparatus.
Q4

Commerce Web-Portal Redesigning Based on Usability Evaluation
Sakulin S., Alfimtsev A., Kalgin Y., Devyatkov V.
Redesigning of the whole portal or some of its webpages does not always lead to a positive result despite the designers' expectations. Nowadays the opinion on how to carry out the redesign of web portals varies. A web portal being in service and in a wide use, a sudden change in its design may result in a drop of the number of clients. The usability evaluation has become important to make a decision on what design of webpages to choose. The paper proposes a method to redesign of commercial web-portals which is based on usability evaluation of some webpages. The evaluation can be undertaken by surveying the staff of the business organization where such a web portal is being developed. The hierarchy made of the Choquet integrals aggregates the results of the questionnaire and allows for the interdependencies between individual metrics of usability. Then, a decision about the redesign of a certain webpage is made on the basis of the aggregated results. The described experiment has shown a great impact of this innovative approach.
Q4

The Role of Virtual Reality to Enhance Cultural Communication
Abokhoza R.R., Sobieh Y.M.
This paper aimed to recognize the role of virtual reality to enhance cultural communication by allowing to the participators who divided into three groups to watch the same substance in three different displays—virtual reality, normal video, images and text—to measure the process of retrieving information or events with a specific cue. The results of the study indicate that the virtual world experience enhances people's awareness of the culture. This new medium, VR, allows for participants to be immersed in the culture in ways that are not possible through the use of other media. Also, it can have an effective impact in cultural communication by allowing the participators to be virtually present at civilized events.
Q4

Exploring the Limitations of Responsive Design Through a Case Study Approach
Almeida F., Monteiro J.A.
Having an online presence is essential for any company regardless of its size and type of business. Users are currently striving to interact with companies through the web, regardless of their access device. In this sense, responsive web design emerged as a very useful technique that allows the dynamic adaptation of the design regardless of the size and resolution of the access device. Despite the unequivocal advantages associated with this technique, there are also limitations which turn this approach not feasible or advisable for all projects. This study, through the realization of five case studies, seeks to identify the main limitations of responsive design and responsive design frameworks. Additionally, this study suggests further development models that may be more effective in the dynamic adaptation of the design and contents according to the features of the access device, such as the adoption of adaptive design, use of native apps, and hybrid models.
Q4

An Information Retrieval System Based on Multiple Portlets
Vaz G.J., Barbedo J.G.
Information retrieval systems built with a service-oriented architecture have numerous advantages, and portlets are a key technology to implement services which interact with each other in the presentation layer. This work presents an efficient approach for the communication between the components of an information retrieval system based on multiple portlets in a single user interface. It also presents the architecture and the main methods of the system implemented as a case of use for this approach. It is shown that the proposed solution yields the best inter-portlet communication mechanism in each situation, while possessing the ability to deliver aggregated search and superior user experience.
Q4

Ontology-Based Analysis of Website Structure for Benchmarking in Retail Business
Vlahovic N., Brljak A., Pejic-Bach M.
With the growing trend of digital transformation, electronic business has become a crucial part of business operations for many companies. Some of the most critical steps in successful transformation pertain not only to data and information acquisition and digitalization but also to adequate publishing and organization of these information resources. Companies share information through their websites, so the structuring of the web content becomes critical during the digital transformation of business. In this paper, the authors present a conceptual model of the managerial tool that is based on semantic analysis of web sites in order to obtain information about the structure of web sites in a particular domain. The resulting ontological model contains information about best practices in web information organization and can be a valuable resource for management when deciding on the organization of their own web content. The system is based on grounded theory and uses current information retrieval methods, natural language processing, semantic networks, and ontologies.
Q4

QoS-Based Collaborative Filtering for Web Service Mining
Feddaoui I., Felhi F., Algarni F., Akaichi J.
Stored information in the databases is heterogeneous, from various sources, and of large volumes. The web service selection becomes nontrivial, as the users are easily overloaded by vast amount candidates. Using the keyword-based search method, users are struggling to choose the best web services among those having similar features. In the traditional methods, the users set different constraints and QoS parameters of a web service from what's claimed by the provider. Moreover, different researches challenge this problem, introducing semantic discovery process to enable relevant and desired search results. These approaches don't give importance to users' opinions and the selection history. The classical development of the ontology is typically entirely based on high human participation. In this paper, the authors use ontology-based querying, user profile to know the history, new collaborative filtering to calculate user, and query similarity and QoS as the final step for web service selection. The approach combines the syntactic and semantic methods to increase the selection precision.
Q4

A Survey on Privacy Preservation in Location-Based Mobile Business
Aloui A., Kazar O.
In mobile business (m-business), a client sends its exact locations to service providers. This data may involve sensitive and private personal information. As a result, misuse of location information by the third party location servers creating privacy issues for clients. This paper provides an overview of the privacy protection techniques currently applied by location-based mobile business. The authors first identify different system architectures and different protection goals. Second, this article provides an overview of the basic principles and mechanisms that exist to protect these privacy goals. In a third step, the authors provide existing privacy protection measures.
Q4

Impact of E-Services Quality on E-Loyalty in Paltel E-Satisfaction as a Mediating Variable
Alkhateeb M.A.
E-loyalty has received great interest from researchers as a key element for customer retention and the growth of firms as well as gaining new customers. This study aims to investigate the impact of the electronic website services quality on e-loyalty in the companies listed within Paltel using electronic satisfaction as a mediating variable. Seven dimensions of e-service quality are examined including content, structure, interaction, presentation, responsiveness, e-security, and reliability. The quantitative research approach is conducted on the returned 393 valid surveys. The findings revealed and emphasized the role played by e-satisfaction as a mediating variable between the independent variable's dimensions and the independent variable.
Q4

A Predictive Maintenance Planning System Implemented on a Web Platform
Romeira B., Moura A., Oliveira Santos J.P.
Predictive maintenance predicts failures and determines the equipment's remaining useful life, which provides maintenance time to plan their interventions, preventing breakdowns or reducing their impact. This paper presents a software application, implemented in a web platform, to support the implementation of a predictive maintenance plan. The developed system currently monitors certain parameters of a plastic injection molding machine. Furthermore, this system has real-time alerts that notify the maintenance team when the measured temperatures are outside the defined limits. Some extras were added, such as the report page, which calculates, automatically, performance indicators, the access management page, and a page that permits the realization of autonomous maintenance interventions, the verification of its fulfilment, and the visualization of the performed interventions' results. After the system's implementation, it was tested in real operating conditions. Following the test time, it was concluded that the desired parameters were measured correctly, which supported the work's continuation.
Q4

SecAOnto
Rosa F.D., Junior L.A., Bonacin R., Jino M.
Security assessment is crucial to the implementation and use of secure web portals. Literature reports studies about knowledge representation models for systems assessment and information security areas; however, there is a lack of conceptual formalization for the security assessment area. The security assessment ontology (SecAOnto) objective is to formalize knowledge on security assessment. It is based on ontologies, taxonomies, vocabularies, glossaries, and market guidelines. This paper presents an application of SecAOnto with the objective of identifying concepts in descriptions of security assessment items; the coverage of security characteristics is determined by using a coverage calculus algorithm. The application of SecAOnto and of the coverage calculus algorithms to the well-known standard ISO/IEC 27001 highlights its expressiveness. The proposal is useful for security experts and researchers in the context of security assessment, as well as to support web-based conceptual architectures.
Q4

Exploring the Use of Social Media Platforms by Public Universities
Halaweh M., Elbahi M., Kamel A., Kabha R., Yousef R.
The use of social media platforms by university students and teachers has been found to facilitate the learning and teaching processes. This includes providing opportunities for students to share and discuss relevant ideas and issues, thus making the task more enjoyable and raising the level of achievement. This study explored the use of social media platforms by public universities in Egypt. It investigated how these universities utilized social media platforms, and whether they are used for educational purposes or not. The data was collected from 21 universities using a questionnaire survey of 2100 undergraduate and postgraduate students. The official social media pages of each university were surveyed and analyzed using content analysis method. The results revealed that the use of social media platforms by public universities was for the purpose of communicating with the general public more than the students. This study also found that the majority of students consider social media platforms of their universities to be useless and not supporting their academic studies. This paper offers practical implications and recommendations for universities' decision makers and social media developers.
Top-100
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Journal of Responsible Innovation
61 citations, 2.49%
|
|
Life Sciences, Society and Policy
49 citations, 2%
|
|
NanoEthics
41 citations, 1.68%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
32 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Biopreservation and Biobanking
29 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Sustainability
27 citations, 1.1%
|
|
BioSocieties
21 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Journal of Medical Ethics
21 citations, 0.86%
|
|
AJOB Neuroscience
20 citations, 0.82%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
20 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Science and Engineering Ethics
20 citations, 0.82%
|
|
BMC Medical Ethics
19 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
16 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
16 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
16 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Neuroethics
16 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Big Data and Society
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
European Journal of Human Genetics
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Science and Public Policy
12 citations, 0.49%
|
|
PLoS ONE
12 citations, 0.49%
|
|
New Genetics and Society
11 citations, 0.45%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
11 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Social Studies of Science
10 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Ethics and Information Technology
10 citations, 0.41%
|
|
European Planning Studies
10 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment
10 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
9 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
9 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Sociology of Health and Illness
9 citations, 0.37%
|
|
AI and Society
9 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Frontiers in Digital Health
9 citations, 0.37%
|
|
The Biotechnology Debate
9 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Annual Review of Public Health
8 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
8 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
8 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Public Understanding of Science
8 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
8 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Futures
7 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
7 citations, 0.29%
|
|
American Journal of Bioethics
7 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Research Policy
7 citations, 0.29%
|
|
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
7 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Developments in Neuroethics and Bioethics
7 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Advances in Neuroethics
7 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Science as Culture
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Science Technology and Human Values
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Open Research Europe
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Personalized Medicine
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence Review
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Palgrave Communications
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
ACS Synthetic Biology
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Healthcare
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Digital Health
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Scientific Reports
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroscience
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
NanoImpact
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IEEE Access
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Societies
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Philosophy and Technology
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
BMJ Open
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Qualitative Health Research
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Community Genetics
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Public Health Ethics
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
BMC Public Health
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Public Health Genomics
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Accountability in Research
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Human Genetics
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
East Asian Science, Technology and Society
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Human Genomics
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Life
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
F1000Research
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Asian Bioethics Review
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
AI and Ethics
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Engineering Biology
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Medical Advancements in Aging and Regenerative Technologies
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Academic Ethics
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Health (United Kingdom)
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Foundations of Science
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Health Policy
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Springer Nature
605 citations, 24.73%
|
|
Elsevier
264 citations, 10.79%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
209 citations, 8.54%
|
|
MDPI
119 citations, 4.87%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
119 citations, 4.87%
|
|
SAGE
105 citations, 4.29%
|
|
Wiley
93 citations, 3.8%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
90 citations, 3.68%
|
|
JMIR Publications
80 citations, 3.27%
|
|
Oxford University Press
44 citations, 1.8%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
40 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
37 citations, 1.51%
|
|
BMJ
28 citations, 1.14%
|
|
IGI Global
27 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
19 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
18 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
15 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
14 citations, 0.57%
|
|
F1000 Research
14 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Emerald
12 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Annual Reviews
12 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
9 citations, 0.37%
|
|
IntechOpen
9 citations, 0.37%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
8 citations, 0.33%
|
|
IOP Publishing
8 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
6 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Duke University Press
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
S. Karger AG
5 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
The Royal Society
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
OpenEdition
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
World Scientific
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
EDP Sciences
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
MIT Press
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
PeerJ
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Silicea - Poligraf, LLC
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
SciELO
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Berghahn Books
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Oekom Publishers
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Portland Press
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Korean Society of Medical Informatics
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Society for Translational Oncology
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Forensic Science Society
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
ORBIT
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOS Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
University of California Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Brill
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Microbiology Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Crop Science Society of America
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
South African Assn. For The Advancement Of Science
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
International Food and Agribusiness Management Association
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Nuclear Medicine
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Editions E D K
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Association for Learning Technology
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
World Health Organization
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Copernicus
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
V.I. Shimakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Scientific Methodical Center
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
International Medical Informatics Association
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
National Association of Forensic Doctors
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
PERSEE Program
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
11 publications, 8.46%
|
|
University of Oxford
7 publications, 5.38%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
6 publications, 4.62%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
4 publications, 3.08%
|
|
Maastricht University
4 publications, 3.08%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
4 publications, 3.08%
|
|
University of Zurich
3 publications, 2.31%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 2.31%
|
|
University of Padua
3 publications, 2.31%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
3 publications, 2.31%
|
|
Robert Koch Institute
3 publications, 2.31%
|
|
Cardiff University
3 publications, 2.31%
|
|
University of Vienna
3 publications, 2.31%
|
|
University of York
3 publications, 2.31%
|
|
Shiraz University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Helsinki
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Södertörn University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Basel
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Brunel University London
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Oslo
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
King's College London
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Newcastle University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Kyoto University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Osaka University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Lancaster University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of British Columbia
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Brigham Young University
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Plymouth
2 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Babol University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Shoolini University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Hamad Bin Khalifa University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Qatar Foundation
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Malmö University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Halmstad University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Dundee
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Bern University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Southampton
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Kaohsiung Medical University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Monash University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Thammasat University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Academy of Athens
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Bristol
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
FIZ Karlsruhe – Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Saginaw Valley State University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Michigan
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Hamburg University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Bremen
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Northumbria University
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Porto
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Coimbra
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Sheffield
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Wellcome Sanger Institute
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Barcelona
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Valencia
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Reading
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Belgrade
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Rovira i Virgili
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Institute for Integrative Systems Biology
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
University of Louisville
1 publication, 0.77%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
|
|
Shiraz University
2 publications, 8.7%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
2 publications, 8.7%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
2 publications, 8.7%
|
|
Babol University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Shoolini University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Hamad Bin Khalifa University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Qatar Foundation
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
ETH Zurich
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Halmstad University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Basel
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Maastricht University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Kaohsiung Medical University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Academy of Athens
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Vienna
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Barcelona
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Reading
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Rovira i Virgili
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Girona
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University of Lleida
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Wolaita Sodo University
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
University College Dublin
1 publication, 4.35%
|
|
Show all (5 more) | |
1
2
|
Publishing countries
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 31, 23.85%
United Kingdom
31 publications, 23.85%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 26, 20%
Netherlands
26 publications, 20%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 11, 8.46%
Germany
11 publications, 8.46%
|
USA
|
USA, 11, 8.46%
USA
11 publications, 8.46%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 8, 6.15%
Belgium
8 publications, 6.15%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 8, 6.15%
Norway
8 publications, 6.15%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 7, 5.38%
Italy
7 publications, 5.38%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 7, 5.38%
Switzerland
7 publications, 5.38%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 7, 5.38%
Sweden
7 publications, 5.38%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 5, 3.85%
Australia
5 publications, 3.85%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 5, 3.85%
Denmark
5 publications, 3.85%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 4, 3.08%
Austria
4 publications, 3.08%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 4, 3.08%
Spain
4 publications, 3.08%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 3.08%
Canada
4 publications, 3.08%
|
France
|
France, 3, 2.31%
France
3 publications, 2.31%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 2.31%
Iran
3 publications, 2.31%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 1.54%
Portugal
2 publications, 1.54%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 1.54%
Ireland
2 publications, 1.54%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 1.54%
Qatar
2 publications, 1.54%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 1.54%
Finland
2 publications, 1.54%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 1.54%
Japan
2 publications, 1.54%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.77%
Russia
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.77%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.77%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.77%
China
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.77%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.77%
Greece
1 publication, 0.77%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.77%
India
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.77%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.77%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.77%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.77%
Poland
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.77%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.77%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.77%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.77%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.77%
|
Show all (5 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
1
2
3
|
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 13.04%
Iran
3 publications, 13.04%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 13.04%
Netherlands
3 publications, 13.04%
|
USA
|
USA, 2, 8.7%
USA
2 publications, 8.7%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 2, 8.7%
United Kingdom
2 publications, 8.7%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 8.7%
Spain
2 publications, 8.7%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 8.7%
Qatar
2 publications, 8.7%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 8.7%
Norway
2 publications, 8.7%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 8.7%
Switzerland
2 publications, 8.7%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 8.7%
Sweden
2 publications, 8.7%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 4.35%
Germany
1 publication, 4.35%
|
France
|
France, 1, 4.35%
France
1 publication, 4.35%
|
China
|
China, 1, 4.35%
China
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 4.35%
Australia
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 4.35%
Austria
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 4.35%
Belgium
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 4.35%
Greece
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 4.35%
Denmark
1 publication, 4.35%
|
India
|
India, 1, 4.35%
India
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 4.35%
Ireland
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 4.35%
Italy
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 4.35%
Latvia
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 4.35%
Malaysia
1 publication, 4.35%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 4.35%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 4.35%
|
1
2
3
|