Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
3.5
SJR
1.078
CiteScore
7.7
Categories
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Space and Planetary Science
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Years of issue
2001-2025
journal names
Astrobiology
Top-3 citing journals

Astrobiology
(8029 citations)

Astrophysical Journal
(2205 citations)

International Journal of Astrobiology
(1634 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Ames Research Center
(226 publications)

California Institute of Technology
(211 publications)

Jet Propulsion Laboratory
(206 publications)

California Institute of Technology
(71 publications)

Jet Propulsion Laboratory
(69 publications)

Goddard Space Flight Center
(49 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 4591
Q1

Microwave sea ice and ocean brightness temperature and emissivity between 22 and 243 GHz from ship-based radiometers
Rückert J.E., Walbröl A., Risse N., Krobot P., Haseneder-Lind R., Mech M., Ebell K., Spreen G.
Abstract
Passive microwave measurements of Arctic sea ice have been conducted over the last 50 years from space and during airborne, ship- and ground-based measurement campaigns. The different radiometric signatures of distinct surface types have led to satellite retrievals of, e.g., sea-ice concentration. In contrast, ground-based upward-viewing radiometers measure radiation emitted from the atmosphere and are used to retrieve atmospheric variables. Here, we present results from a ship-based radiometer setup with a mirror construction, which allows us to switch between atmospheric and surface measurements flexibly. This way, in summer 2022, surface observations in the Arctic marginal sea-ice zone could be performed from the research vessel Polarstern by two radiometers covering the frequency range from 22 to 243 GHz. At low frequencies, the brightness temperatures show clear signatures of different surface conditions. We estimate emissivities at 53∘ zenith angle from infrared-based skin temperatures. Predominantly vertically polarized 22–31 GHz emissivities are between 0.51 and 0.55 for open ocean and around 0.95 for sea ice. Predominantly horizontally polarized 243 GHz ocean emissivities are around 0.78 and ice surfaces exhibit a large variability from 0.67 to 0.82. Our results can improve the characterization of surface emissions in satellite retrieval algorithms.
Q1

Characteristics, origin, and significance of chessboard subgrain boundaries in the WAIS Divide Ice Core
Fitzpatrick J.J., Wilen L.A., Voigt D.E., Alley R.B., Fegyveresi J.M.
Q1

Distributed energy balance, mass balance and climate sensitivity of upper Chandra Basin glaciers, western Himalaya
Oulkar S.N., Sharma P., Pratap B., Thamban M., Laha S., Patel L.K., Singh A.T.
Abstract
Glacier and snow melt are the primary sources of water for streams, and rivers in upper Indus region of the western Himalaya. However, the magnitude of runoff from this glacierized basin is expected to vary with the available energy in the catchment. Here, we used a physically based energy balance model to estimate the surface energy and surface mass balance (SMB) of the upper Chandra Basin glaciers for 7 hydrological years from 2015 to 2022. A strong seasonality is observed, with net radiation being the dominant energy flux in the summer, while latent and sensible heat flux dominated in the winter. The estimated mean annual SMB of the upper Chandra Basin glaciers is −0.51 ± 0.28 m w.e. a−1, with a cumulative SMB of −3.54 m w.e during 7 years from 2015 to 2022. We find that the geographical factors like aspect, slope, size and elevation of the glacier contribute towards the spatial variability of SMB within the study region. The findings reveal that a 42% increase in precipitation is necessary to counteract the additional mass loss resulting from a 1°C increase in air temperature for the upper Chandra Basin glaciers.
Q1

Forecasting Arctic sea ice drift: insights from two case studies
Valisuo I., Tietsche S.
Abstract
The two main large-scale features of Arctic sea-ice drift are the Beaufort Gyre and the Transpolar Drift Stream. They exhibit strong intraseasonal and interannual variability. Winter 2016/17 showed increased cyclone activity, leading to the collapse of the Beaufort Sea high and the reversal of the Beaufort Gyre. Winter 2020/21 displayed decreased cyclone activity and intense anticyclonic ice transport in the Beaufort Gyre. Here we show that the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts’s (ECMWF) extended-range (46 days) retrospective forecasts were able to predict the ice motion during these cases. The initial contrasts in sea level pressure, surface winds and ice drift were well captured, and their temporal evolution—including the reversal of the usual drift direction—well reproduced by the forecasts initialized about a week before the event. Sea-ice thickness in the forecast exhibited initial errors even greater than 1 m that persisted throughout the forecast and negatively affected the ice speed forecast. Despite these shortcomings, the dynamic forecast outperformed the persistence and climatology forecast and represented the observed relation between surface winds and ice drift well. The benefit of dynamic forecasts is especially clear in cases that differ from climatology, like the one we focus on.
Q1

Bragg scattering of surface-gravity waves by an ice shelf with rolling surface morphology
Konovalov Y.V.
Abstract
The propagation of elastic-flexural–gravity waves through an ice shelf is modeled using full three-dimensional elastic models that are coupled with a treatment of under-shelf sea-water flux: (i) finite-difference model (Model 1), (ii) finite-volume model (Model 2) and (iii) depth-integrated finite-difference model (Model 3). The sea-water flow under the ice shelf is described by a wave equation involving the pressure (the sea-water flow is treated as a “potential flow”). Numerical experiments were undertaken for an ice shelf with ‘rolling’ surface morphology, which implies a periodic structure of the ice shelf. The propagation of ocean waves through an ice shelf with rolling surface morphology is accompanied by Bragg scattering (also called Floquet band insulation). The numerical experiments reveal that band gaps resulting from this scattering occur in the dispersion spectra in frequency bands that are consistent with the Bragg’s law. Band gaps render the medium opaque to wave, that is, essentially, the abatement of the incident ocean wave by ice shelf with rolling surface morphology is observed in the models. This abatement explains the ability of preserving of ice shelves like the Ward Hunt Ice Shelf, Ellesmere Island, Canadian Arctic, from the possible resonant-like destroying impact of ocean swell.
Q1

Towards a high-resolution sea ice model: exploring the potential of modelling ice floe fracture with the peridynamic method
Zhang Y., Lu W., Lubbad R., Løset S., Tsarau A., Høyland K.V.
Abstract
Sea-ice deformation is concentrated at linear kinematic features such as ridges and leads. Ridging and leads opening processes are highly related to sea-ice fracture. Different rheology models have been successfully applied in various scenarios. However, most of the approaches adopted are based on continuum mechanics that do not explicitly model fracture processes. There are emerging needs for a more physically informed modelling methods that explicitly address fracture at the kilometre scale. In pursuing this objective, in this paper we explored the potential of applying a promising mesh free numerical method, peridynamics (PD), in modelling ice floe (~km) fractures. PD offers a physically and mathematically consistent theory through which spontaneous emergence and propagation of cracks can be achieved. The integral nature of the governing equations in PD remains valid even if a crack appears. We numerically investigated in this paper the tensile fracture (e.g. lead opening) of an elastic heterogenous ice floe. The modelling results were compared with published numerical results obtained by another numerical method. The potentials and challenges of PD in this application are discussed and summarized.
Q1

Impact of varying solar angles on Arctic iceberg area retrieval from Sentinel-2 near-infrared data
Fisser H., Doulgeris A.P., Høyland K.V.
Abstract
Icebergs are part of the glacial mass balance and they interact with the ocean and with sea ice. Optical satellite remote sensing is often used to retrieve the above-waterline area of icebergs. However, varying solar angles introduce an error to the iceberg area retrieval that had not been quantified. Herein, we approximate the iceberg area error for top-of-atmosphere Sentinel-2 near-infrared data at a range of solar zenith angles. First, we calibrate an iceberg threshold at a
$56^\circ$
solar zenith angle with reference to higher resolution airborne imagery at Storfjorden, Svalbard. A reflectance threshold of 0.12 yields the lowest relative error of 0.19% ± 15.74% and the lowest interquartile spread. Second, we apply the 0.12 reflectance threshold to Sentinel-2 data at 14 solar zenith angles between
$45^\circ$
and
$81^\circ$
in the Kangerlussuaq Fjord, south-east Greenland. Here we quantify the error variation with the solar zenith angle for a consistent set of large icebergs. The error variation is then standardized to the error obtained in Svalbard. Up to a solar zenith angle of
$65^\circ$
, the mean standardized iceberg area error remains between 5.9% and −5.67%. Above
$65^\circ$
, iceberg areas are underestimated and inconsistent, caused by a segregation into shadows and sun-facing slopes.
Q1

Spatiotemporal mass balance variability of Jostedalsbreen ice cap, Norway, revealed by a temperature-index model with data assimilation
Sjursen K.H., Dunse T., Schuler T.V., Andreassen L.M., Åkesson H.
Abstract
Jostedalsbreen in western Norway is the mainland Europe's largest ice cap and a complex system of more than 80 glaciers. While observational records indicate a significant sensitivity to climate fluctuations, knowledge about ice-cap wide spatiotemporal mass changes and their drivers remain sparse. Here, we quantify the surface mass balance (SMB) of Jostedalsbreen from 1960 to 2020 using a temperature-index model within a Bayesian framework. We assimilate seasonal glaciological SMB to constrain accumulation and ablation, and geodetic mass balance to adjust model parameters for each glacier individually. Overall, we find that Jostedalsbreen has experienced a small mass loss of −0.07 m w.e. a−1 (−0.21 to +0.08 m w.e. a−1), but with substantial spatiotemporal variability. Our results suggest that winter SMB variations were the main control on annual SMB between 1960 and 2000, while increasingly negative summer SMB is responsible for substantial mass losses after 2000. Spatial variations in SMB between glaciers or regions of the ice cap are likely associated with local topography and its effect on orographic precipitation. We advocate for models to leverage the growing availability of observational resources to improve SMB predictions. We demonstrate an approach that incorporates complementary datasets, while addressing their inherent uncertainties, to constrain models and provide robust estimates of spatiotemporal SMB and associated uncertainties.
Q1

Open discussion at the IGS symposium on ‘The edges of glaciology’, 7 July 2023
Fowler A.C.
Abstract
There follows the open discussion which took place at the IGS symposium on ‘The Edges of Glaciology’, in July 2023. The discussion was curated by Doug Benn. The time of speaking in minutes and seconds into the Panopto recording is given in bold figures. The recording itself is provided as electronic supplementary material. It has been transcribed and edited by Andrew Fowler, with much (and much-needed) assistance from the participants. Footnotes (mostly references) are editorial intrusions.
Q1

U-net with ResNet-34 backbone for dual-polarized C-band baltic sea-ice SAR segmentation
Karvonen J.
Abstract
In this study, the U-net with ResNet-34, i.e. a residual neural network with 34 layers, backbone semantic segmentation network is applied to C-band sea-ice SAR imagery over the Baltic Sea. Sentinel-1 Extra Wide Swath mode HH/HV-polarized SAR data acquired during the winter season 2018–2019, and corresponding segments derived from the daily Baltic Sea ice charts were used for training the segmentation algorithm. C-band SAR image mosaics of the winter season 2020–2021 were then used to evaluate the segmentation. The major objective was to study the suitability of semantic segmentation of SAR imagery for automated SAR segmentation and also to find a potential replacement for the outdated iterated conditional modes (ICM) algorithm currently in operational use. The results compared to the daily Baltic Sea ice charts and the operational ICM segmentation and visual interpretation were encouraging from the operational point of view. Open water areas were located very well and the oversegmentation produced by ICM was significantly reduced. The correspondence between the ice chart polygons and the segmentation results was also reasonably good. Based on the results, the studied method is a potential candidate to replace the operational ICM SAR segmentation used in the Copernicus Marine Service automated sea-ice products at Finnish Meteorological Institute.
Q1

Comparing heterogeneity of sea ice models with Viscous-Plastic and Maxwell Elasto-Brittle rheology
Bourgett M., Losch M., Plante M.
Abstract
Classical sea-ice models in climate model resolution do not resolve the small-scale physics of sea ice. New methods to address this problem include modifications to established viscous-plastic (VP) rheology models, sub-gridscale parameterizations or new rheologies such as the Maxwell elasto-brittle (MEB) rheology. Here, we investigate differences in gridscale dynamics simulated by the VP and MEB models, their dependency on tunable model parameters and their response to added stochastic perturbations of material parameters in a new implementation in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model. Idealized simulations are used to demonstrate that material parameters can be tuned so that both VP and MEB rheologies lead to similar cohesive stress states, arching behaviour and heterogeneity in the deformation fields. As expected, simulations with MEB rheology generally show more heterogeneity than the VP model as measured by the number of simulated linear kinematic features (LKFs). For both rheologies, the cohesion determines the emergence of LKFs. Introducing gridscale heterogeneity by random model parameter perturbation, however, leads to a larger increase of LKF numbers in the VP simulations than in the MEB simulations and similar heterogeneity between VP and MEB models.
Q1

Impact of internal wave drag on Arctic sea ice
Flocco D., Feltham D., Schroeder D., Aksenov Y., Siahaan A., Tsamados M.
Abstract
A parameterization of the impact of internal waves on momentum transfer at the sea-ice–ocean interface based on previous work by McPhee has been implemented in a sea-ice model for the first time. The ice–ocean drag from internal waves is relevant for shallow mixed layer depth and the presence of a density jump at the pycnocline and is also a function of the strength of the stratification beneath the ocean mixed layer and geometry of the ice interface. We present results from a coupled sea-ice–ocean model where the parameterization of internal wave drag has been implemented. We conducted simulations spanning the years from 2000 to 2017. We find a deceleration of ice drift by 5–8% in both winter and summer, but with significant spatial and temporal variation reaching seasonal average values of ~10%. The spatial variation of ice transport leads to local impacts on deformed ice of magnitude ~0.05 m (2–5%), and reductions in ocean-to-ice heat fluxes of ~1 W m−2, and a decrease in bottom melt of ~0.02–0.04 cm d−1. There is an increase of up to 15% in thickness and ice concentration in the Canadian Arctic and a 10% overall impact on the total sea-ice volume.
Q1

A reassessment of ice cliff dynamics upon debris-covered glaciers
Evatt G.W., Mayer C., Wirbel A., Abrahams I.D., Nicholson L.
Abstract
We present a new model for understanding ice cliff dynamics within a debris-covered glacier ablation zone. This simple energy-balance model incorporates a moving frame of reference, made necessary by the melt of the surrounding debris-covered ice. In so doing, this also formalises how different types of field measurements can be utilised and compared. Our predictions include showing: ice cliffs can endogenously select their own slope angles; that there should be an indifference between illuminated north- and south-facing ice cliff slopes; that ice cliffs grow steeper with thicker debris layers; that ice cliffs cannot stably exist below a certain critical debris thickness and that some modelling of ice cliffs (when not incorporating the moving frame) may incorrectly estimate ice mass losses. All of our results are produced using parametrisations from Baltoro Glacier, Karakoram.
Q1

Deriving iceberg ablation rates using an on-iceberg autonomous phase-sensitive radar (ApRES)
Schild K.M., Vaňková I., Sutherland D.A., Nicholls K.
Abstract
The increase in iceberg discharge into the polar oceans highlights the importance of understanding how quickly icebergs are deteriorating and where the resulting freshwater injection is occurring. Recent advances in quantifying iceberg deterioration through combinations of modeling, remote sensing and direct in situ measurements have successfully calculated overall ablation rates, and surface and sidewall ablation; however, in situ measurements of basal melt rates have been difficult to obtain. Radar has successfully measured iceberg thickness, but repeat measurements, which would capture a change in iceberg thickness with time, have not yet been collected. Here we test the applicability of using an on-iceberg autonomous phase-sensitive radar (ApRES) to quantify basal ablation rates of a large (~800 m long) non-tabular Arctic iceberg during an intensive 2019 summer field campaign in Sermilik Fjord, southeast Greenland. We find that ApRES can be used to measure basal ablation even over a short deployment period (10 d), and also provide a lower bound on sidewall melt. This study fills a critical gap in iceberg research and pushes the limits of field instrumentation.
Q1

On sea ice emission modeling for MOSAiC's L-band radiometric measurements
Hernández-Macià F., Gabarró C., Huntemann M., Naderpour R., Johnson J.T., Jezek K.C.
Abstract
The retrieval of sea ice thickness using L-band passive remote sensing requires robust models for emission from sea ice. In this work, measurements obtained from surface-based radiometers during the MOSAiC expedition are assessed with the Burke, Wilheit and SMRT radiative transfer models. These models encompass distinct methodologies: radiative transfer with/without wave coherence effects, and with/without scattering. Before running these emission models, the sea ice growth is simulated using the Cumulative Freezing Degree Days (CFDD) model to further compute the evolution of the ice structure during each period. Ice coring profiles done near the instruments are used to obtain the initial state of the computation, along with Digital Thermistor Chain (DTC) data to derive the sea ice temperature during the analyzed periods. The results suggest that the coherent approach used in the Wilheit model results in a better agreement with the horizontal polarization of the in situ measured brightness temperature. The Burke and SMRT incoherent models offer a more robust fit for the vertical component. These models are almost equivalent since the scattering considered in SMRT can be safely neglected at this low frequency, but the Burke model misses an important contribution from the snow layer above sea ice. The results also suggest that a more realistic permittivity falls between the spheres and random needles formulations, with potential for refinement, particularly for L-band applications, through future field measurements.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
|
|
Astrobiology
8029 citations, 12.82%
|
|
Astrophysical Journal
2205 citations, 3.52%
|
|
International Journal of Astrobiology
1634 citations, 2.61%
|
|
Icarus
1415 citations, 2.26%
|
|
Life
1324 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
980 citations, 1.56%
|
|
Planetary and Space Science
977 citations, 1.56%
|
|
Astronomy and Astrophysics
967 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
963 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
793 citations, 1.27%
|
|
The Planetary Science Journal
716 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Astronomical Journal
715 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Space Science Reviews
695 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Scientific Reports
684 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Astrophysical Journal Letters
598 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
563 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
549 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
537 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
469 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Geobiology
461 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Precambrian Research
413 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Acta Astronautica
411 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
393 citations, 0.63%
|
|
ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
371 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
359 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Advances in Space Research
322 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Nature Communications
314 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Chemical Geology
314 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Nature Astronomy
289 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Geophysical Research Letters
280 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Raman Spectroscopy
273 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology
268 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Environmental Microbiology
261 citations, 0.42%
|
|
PLoS ONE
260 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Life Sciences in Space Research
242 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Earth-Science Reviews
208 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
205 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
203 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research
170 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Microorganisms
169 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Extremophiles
168 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Science advances
165 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
164 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
164 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Geomicrobiology Journal
154 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Nature
140 citations, 0.22%
|
|
npj Microgravity
137 citations, 0.22%
|
|
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
132 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
131 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Nature Geoscience
130 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Geosciences (Switzerland)
129 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Geology
127 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
125 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Universe
123 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Earth and Space Science
122 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Minerals
118 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Advances in Astrobiology and Biogeophysics
114 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
113 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Communications Earth & Environment
110 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Science
105 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
100 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Experimental Astronomy
98 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Solar System Research
96 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
96 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Evolution
90 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of the Geological Society
89 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Analytical Chemistry
86 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
84 citations, 0.13%
|
|
The Earth's Cryosphere and Sea Level Change
83 citations, 0.13%
|
|
ISME Journal
82 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Sedimentary Geology
80 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
79 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Microgravity Science and Technology
77 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
76 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Aerospace
75 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
74 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Microbiome
73 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
73 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry
71 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Earth Science
71 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Astrophysics and Space Science
69 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
69 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
68 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Astronomy and Geophysics
68 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series
67 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
67 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Biogeosciences
67 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
67 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Chemistry - A European Journal
66 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
65 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
65 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
64 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
64 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Remote Sensing
63 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Microbial Ecology
62 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Sedimentology
61 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Mineralogist
61 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Analytica Chimica Acta
60 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Gravitational and Space Research
60 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Organic Geochemistry
59 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
|
|
Elsevier
10605 citations, 16.93%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
8082 citations, 12.91%
|
|
Springer Nature
7628 citations, 12.18%
|
|
Wiley
4560 citations, 7.28%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
3857 citations, 6.16%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
3672 citations, 5.86%
|
|
MDPI
3242 citations, 5.18%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1961 citations, 3.13%
|
|
Oxford University Press
1616 citations, 2.58%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1285 citations, 2.05%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
1098 citations, 1.75%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1048 citations, 1.67%
|
|
IOP Publishing
807 citations, 1.29%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
677 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
653 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
538 citations, 0.86%
|
|
The Royal Society
462 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
458 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
453 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
451 citations, 0.72%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
446 citations, 0.71%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
359 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
316 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Annual Reviews
253 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
193 citations, 0.31%
|
|
AIP Publishing
186 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Copernicus
183 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Geological Society of London
165 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Geological Society of America
164 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Mineralogical Society of America
141 citations, 0.23%
|
|
SAGE
123 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
118 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Science in China Press
105 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
99 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
95 citations, 0.15%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
91 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
71 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IntechOpen
71 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
70 citations, 0.11%
|
|
PeerJ
57 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Microbiology Society
49 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
42 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
39 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
35 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Japanese Society for Biological Sciences in Space
33 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists
32 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
31 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society for Sedimentary Geology (SEPM)
30 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences
29 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
29 citations, 0.05%
|
|
World Scientific
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Portland Press
25 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
25 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
MIT Press
21 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
20 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IGI Global
20 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Society Of Microbial Ecology
19 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tokyo Geographical Society
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Astronomical Observatory
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Geological Society of Japan
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Physiological Society
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Geological Society of South Africa
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of California Press
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mineralogical Society
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SAE International
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SciELO
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Radiation Research Society
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Han-Gug Misaengmul Hag-hoe/The Microbiological Society of Korea
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Allerton Press
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Magnolia Press
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Association of Mineralogical Sciences
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
OpenEdition
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Geochemical Society of Japan
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Emerald
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Experimental Botany
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Ames Research Center
226 publications, 11.04%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
211 publications, 10.31%
|
|
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
206 publications, 10.06%
|
|
Goddard Space Flight Center
133 publications, 6.5%
|
|
German Aerospace Center
120 publications, 5.86%
|
|
Arizona State University
92 publications, 4.49%
|
|
University of Washington
84 publications, 4.1%
|
|
National Institute for Aerospace Technology
75 publications, 3.66%
|
|
University of Arizona
71 publications, 3.47%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
66 publications, 3.22%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
59 publications, 2.88%
|
|
University of Florida
59 publications, 2.88%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
55 publications, 2.69%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
53 publications, 2.59%
|
|
Imperial College London
42 publications, 2.05%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
42 publications, 2.05%
|
|
University College London
40 publications, 1.95%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
39 publications, 1.91%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
38 publications, 1.86%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
37 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Harvard University
37 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Sorbonne University
36 publications, 1.76%
|
|
University of New South Wales
35 publications, 1.71%
|
|
Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
34 publications, 1.66%
|
|
European Space Research and Technology Centre
34 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
32 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Technical University of Berlin
30 publications, 1.47%
|
|
National Institute for Astrophysics
29 publications, 1.42%
|
|
Stanford University
29 publications, 1.42%
|
|
Space Research Institute of the Austrian Academy of Sciences
28 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
28 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Observatoire de Paris
28 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Universities Space Research Association
27 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Institut Pierre Simon Laplace
27 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Cornell University
26 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Princeton University
26 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Southern California
25 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
24 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Washington State University
24 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
24 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
23 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
23 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of St Andrews
23 publications, 1.12%
|
|
McGill University
23 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Bern
22 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
22 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Paris Cité University
22 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
22 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
21 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Stockholm University
21 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
21 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
20 publications, 0.98%
|
|
McMaster University
20 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Tokyo
20 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
20 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Université Paris-Est Créteil
20 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Western University
20 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Portland State University
20 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Cambridge
19 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Macquarie University
19 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Leicester
18 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Michigan State University
17 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Georgetown University
17 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
17 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
17 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Oxford
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Michigan
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Vienna
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Toronto
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
16 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
14 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
14 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Bologna
14 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Bergen
14 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Glasgow
14 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
14 publications, 0.68%
|
|
York University
14 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Australian National University
13 publications, 0.64%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
13 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Tuscia University
13 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Tennessee
13 publications, 0.64%
|
|
ETH Zurich
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Western Australia
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Columbia University
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Brown University
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Liège
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Eötvös Loránd University (University of Budapest)
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Minnesota
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Leiden University
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Texas at El Paso
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
10 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
California Institute of Technology
71 publications, 14%
|
|
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
69 publications, 13.61%
|
|
Goddard Space Flight Center
49 publications, 9.66%
|
|
Ames Research Center
47 publications, 9.27%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
34 publications, 6.71%
|
|
National Institute for Aerospace Technology
30 publications, 5.92%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
26 publications, 5.13%
|
|
Arizona State University
25 publications, 4.93%
|
|
German Aerospace Center
23 publications, 4.54%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
19 publications, 3.75%
|
|
University of Washington
18 publications, 3.55%
|
|
University of Florida
17 publications, 3.35%
|
|
University of Cambridge
16 publications, 3.16%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
16 publications, 3.16%
|
|
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
16 publications, 3.16%
|
|
University of Arizona
15 publications, 2.96%
|
|
Universities Space Research Association
14 publications, 2.76%
|
|
Georgetown University
13 publications, 2.56%
|
|
Sorbonne University
12 publications, 2.37%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
12 publications, 2.37%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
12 publications, 2.37%
|
|
University of New South Wales
11 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Imperial College London
11 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
11 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Michigan State University
10 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Glasgow
10 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Harvard University
10 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
10 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
10 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
10 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Lorraine
9 publications, 1.78%
|
|
ETH Zurich
9 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Bologna
9 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Cornell University
9 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
9 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
9 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
9 publications, 1.78%
|
|
York University
9 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
8 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Technical University of Berlin
8 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
8 publications, 1.58%
|
|
McGill University
8 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
8 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
8 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of Bern
7 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University College London
7 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Minnesota
7 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Brown University
7 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Western University
7 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Toronto
7 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Oxford
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Yale University
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
National Institute for Astrophysics
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Stanford University
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Princeton University
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of St Andrews
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Michigan
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Göttingen
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Institut Pierre Simon Laplace
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Tennessee
6 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Northern Arizona University
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Eötvös Loránd University (University of Budapest)
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Cardiff University
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Tokyo
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Nantes
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Oslo
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Institute for Space Astrophysics and Planetology
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Western Australia
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Macquarie University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
George Washington University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Boston University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Howard University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Tufts University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Utrecht University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Vienna
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Okayama University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Granada
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Andalusian Earth Sciences Institute
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Yugra State University
3 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Tübingen
3 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1273, 62.19%
USA
1273 publications, 62.19%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 317, 15.49%
United Kingdom
317 publications, 15.49%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 253, 12.36%
Germany
253 publications, 12.36%
|
France
|
France, 204, 9.97%
France
204 publications, 9.97%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 150, 7.33%
Canada
150 publications, 7.33%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 142, 6.94%
Spain
142 publications, 6.94%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 118, 5.76%
Italy
118 publications, 5.76%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 99, 4.84%
Japan
99 publications, 4.84%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 87, 4.25%
Netherlands
87 publications, 4.25%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 85, 4.15%
Australia
85 publications, 4.15%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 72, 3.52%
Austria
72 publications, 3.52%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 67, 3.27%
Sweden
67 publications, 3.27%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 60, 2.93%
Switzerland
60 publications, 2.93%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 59, 2.88%
Mexico
59 publications, 2.88%
|
China
|
China, 55, 2.69%
China
55 publications, 2.69%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 48, 2.34%
Belgium
48 publications, 2.34%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 38, 1.86%
Russia
38 publications, 1.86%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 35, 1.71%
Brazil
35 publications, 1.71%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 30, 1.47%
Denmark
30 publications, 1.47%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 28, 1.37%
Norway
28 publications, 1.37%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 25, 1.22%
Poland
25 publications, 1.22%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 22, 1.07%
Hungary
22 publications, 1.07%
|
India
|
India, 21, 1.03%
India
21 publications, 1.03%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 20, 0.98%
New Zealand
20 publications, 0.98%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 16, 0.78%
Chile
16 publications, 0.78%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 15, 0.73%
Greece
15 publications, 0.73%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 13, 0.64%
Czech Republic
13 publications, 0.64%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 10, 0.49%
Argentina
10 publications, 0.49%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 10, 0.49%
South Africa
10 publications, 0.49%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 9, 0.44%
Portugal
9 publications, 0.44%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 7, 0.34%
Ukraine
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 0.34%
Ireland
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 7, 0.34%
Iceland
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 7, 0.34%
Romania
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 0.34%
Turkey
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 7, 0.34%
Finland
7 publications, 0.34%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 6, 0.29%
Israel
6 publications, 0.29%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 5, 0.24%
Morocco
5 publications, 0.24%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 5, 0.24%
Serbia
5 publications, 0.24%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.2%
UAE
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.15%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 3, 0.15%
Ecuador
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.1%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.1%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 2, 0.1%
Cuba
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.1%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.1%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.1%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.1%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.05%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.05%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.05%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.05%
Peru
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.05%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.05%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.05%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.05%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.05%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.05%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.05%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.05%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.05%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.05%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (32 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 298, 58.78%
USA
298 publications, 58.78%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 107, 21.1%
United Kingdom
107 publications, 21.1%
|
France
|
France, 53, 10.45%
France
53 publications, 10.45%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 52, 10.26%
Germany
52 publications, 10.26%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 49, 9.66%
Spain
49 publications, 9.66%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 45, 8.88%
Canada
45 publications, 8.88%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 42, 8.28%
Japan
42 publications, 8.28%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 41, 8.09%
Italy
41 publications, 8.09%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 24, 4.73%
Switzerland
24 publications, 4.73%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 22, 4.34%
Australia
22 publications, 4.34%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 22, 4.34%
Netherlands
22 publications, 4.34%
|
China
|
China, 20, 3.94%
China
20 publications, 3.94%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 16, 3.16%
Brazil
16 publications, 3.16%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 16, 3.16%
Mexico
16 publications, 3.16%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 15, 2.96%
Austria
15 publications, 2.96%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 12, 2.37%
Belgium
12 publications, 2.37%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 11, 2.17%
Sweden
11 publications, 2.17%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 9, 1.78%
Poland
9 publications, 1.78%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 9, 1.78%
Chile
9 publications, 1.78%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 8, 1.58%
Russia
8 publications, 1.58%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 8, 1.58%
Hungary
8 publications, 1.58%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 7, 1.38%
Denmark
7 publications, 1.38%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 7, 1.38%
Norway
7 publications, 1.38%
|
India
|
India, 6, 1.18%
India
6 publications, 1.18%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.99%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.99%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.99%
Greece
5 publications, 0.99%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 5, 0.99%
New Zealand
5 publications, 0.99%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.79%
UAE
4 publications, 0.79%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 0.79%
Turkey
4 publications, 0.79%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.59%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.59%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.59%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.59%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 0.59%
South Africa
3 publications, 0.59%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.39%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.39%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.39%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.39%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.39%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.39%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.39%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.39%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.39%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.39%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.39%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.39%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.39%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.39%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.2%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.2%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.2%
Israel
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.2%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.2%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.2%
Peru
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.2%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.2%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.2%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.2%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Show all (19 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
4 profile journal articles
Konhauser Kurt
324 publications,
16 355 citations
h-index: 65
3 profile journal articles
Barone Vincenzo

Scuola Normale Superiore
955 publications,
90 755 citations
h-index: 101
2 profile journal articles
Danielache Sebastian
🥼 🤝
38 publications,
905 citations
h-index: 17
1 profile journal article
Khamizov Ruslan
DSc in Chemistry

Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
57 publications,
368 citations
h-index: 12
1 profile journal article
Nechitailo Galina

Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
30 publications,
417 citations
h-index: 10
1 profile journal article
Lisov Denis

Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
42 publications,
352 citations
h-index: 11
1 profile journal article
Nikiforov Sergei

Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
56 publications,
4 655 citations
h-index: 19
1 profile journal article
Ruban Alexander
🥼
Queen Mary University of London
216 publications,
17 292 citations
h-index: 72
1 profile journal article
Talalay Pavel

Jilin University

China University of Geosciences (Beijing)
110 publications,
854 citations
h-index: 18
1 profile journal article
Ota Tsutomu
15 publications,
249 citations
h-index: 7