Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.2
SJR
0.530
CiteScore
3.4
Categories
Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Communication
Areas
Arts and Humanities
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2002-2025
journal names
Visual Communication
VISUAL COMMUN-US
Top-3 citing journals

Visual Communication
(475 citations)

Social Semiotics
(235 citations)

Discourse, Context and Media
(105 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Technology Sydney
(24 publications)

University of New South Wales
(22 publications)

Cardiff University
(13 publications)

University of New South Wales
(9 publications)

University of Technology Sydney
(8 publications)

University of Amsterdam
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1136
Q2

Imputation of missing clock times – application to procalcitonin concentration time course after birth
Bokor A.J., Holford N., Hannam J.A.
Abstract
The time course of biomarkers (e.g., acute phase proteins) are typically described using days relative to events of interest, such as surgery or birth, without specifying the sample time. This limits their use as they may change rapidly during a single day. We investigated strategies to impute missing clock times, using procalcitonin for population modelling as the motivating example. 1275 procalcitonin concentrations from 282 neonates were available with dates but not sample times (Scenario 0). Missing clock times were imputed using a random uniform distribution under three scenarios: (1) minimum sampling intervals (8–12 h); (2) procalcitonin concentrations increase for postnatal days 0–1 then decrease; (3) standard sampling practice at the study hospital. Unique datasets (n = 100) were created with scenario-specific imputed clock times. Procalcitonin was modelled for each scenario using the same non-linear mixed effects model using NONMEM. Scenarios were evaluated by the NONMEM objective function value compared to Scenario 0 (∆OFV) and with visual predictive checks. Scenario 3, based on standard sampling practice at the study hospital, was the best imputation procedure with an improved objective function value compared to Scenario 0 (∆OFV: -62.6). Scenario 3 showed a shorter lag time between the birth event and the procalcitonin concentration increase (average: 12.0 h, 95% interval: 9.7 to 14.3 h) compared to other scenarios (averages: 15.3 to 18.7 h). A methodology for selecting imputation strategies for clock times was developed. This may be applied to other problems where clock times are missing.
Q2

Sampling from covariate distribution may not always be necessary in PK/PD simulations: illustrative examples with antibiotics
Liu F., Cheng Z., Li S., Xie F.
Q2
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

The impact of misspecified covariate models on inclusion and omission bias when using fixed effects and full random effects models
Nyberg J., Jonsson E.N.
Q2
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Defining preclinical efficacy with the DNAPK inhibitor AZD7648 in combination with olaparib: a minimal systems pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model
DeJongh J., Cadogan E., Davies M., Ramos-Montoya A., Smith A., van Steeg T., Richards R.
Q2
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Reliability of in vitro data for the mechanistic prediction of brain extracellular fluid pharmacokinetics of P-glycoprotein substrates in vivo; are we scaling correctly?
van Valkengoed D.W., Hirasawa M., Rottschäfer V., de Lange E.C.
Abstract
Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles often do not resemble the PK within the central nervous system (CNS) because of blood–brain-border (BBB) processes, like active efflux by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Methods to predict CNS-PK are therefore desired. Here we investigate whether in vitro apparent permeability (Papp) and corrected efflux ratio (ERc) extracted from literature can be repurposed as input for the LeiCNS-PK3.4 physiologically-based PK model to confidently predict rat brain extracellular fluid (ECF) PK of P-gp substrates. Literature values of in vitro Caco-2, LLC-PK1-mdr1a/MDR1, and MDCKII-MDR1 cell line transport data were used to calculate P-gp efflux clearance (CLPgp). Subsequently, CLPgp was scaled from in vitro to in vivo through a relative expression factor (REF) based on P-gp expression differences. BrainECF PK was predicted well (within twofold error of the observed data) for 2 out of 4 P-gp substrates after short infusions and 3 out of 4 P-gp substrates after continuous infusions. Variability of in vitro parameters impacted both predicted rate and extent of drug distribution, reducing model applicability. Notably, use of transport data and in vitro P-gp expression obtained from a single study did not guarantee an accurate prediction; it often resulted in worse predictions than when using in vitro expression values reported by other labs. Overall, LeiCNS-PK3.4 shows promise in predicting brainECF PK, but this study highlights that the in vitro to in vivo translation is not yet robust. We conclude that more information is needed about context and drug dependency of in vitro data for robust brainECF PK predictions.
Q2

Quantifying natural amyloid plaque accumulation in the continuum of Alzheimer’s disease using ADNI
Elhefnawy M.E., Patson N., Mouksassi S., Pillai G., Shcherbinin S., Chigutsa E., Gueorguieva I.
Brain amyloid beta neuritic plaque accumulation is associated with an increased risk of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [Pfeil, J., et al. in Neurobiol Aging 106: 119–129, 2021]. Several studies estimate rates of change in amyloid plaque over time in clinically heterogeneous cohorts with different factors impacting amyloid plaque accumulation from ADNI and AIBL [Laccarino, L., et al. in Annals Clin and Trans Neurol 6: 1113 1120, 2019, Vos, S.J., et al. in Brain 138: 1327–1338, 2015, Lim, Y.Y., et al. in Alzheimer’s Dementia 9: 538-545, 2013], but there are no reports using non-linear mixed effect model for amyloid plaque progression over time similar to that existing of disease-modifying biomarkers for other diseases [Cook, S.F. and R.R. Bies in Current Pharmacol Rep 2: 221–230, 2016, Gueorguieva, I., et al. in Alzheimer’s Dementia 19: 2253–2264, 2023]. This study describes the natural progression of amyloid accumulation with population mean and between-participant variability for baseline and intrinsic progression rates quantified across the AD spectrum. 1340 ADNI participants were followed over a 10-year period with 18F-florbetapir PET scans used for amyloid plaque detection. Non-linear mixed effect with stepwise covariate modelling (scm) was used. Change in natural amyloid plaque levels over 10 year period followed an exponential growth model with an intrinsic rate of approx. 3 centiloid units/year. Age, gender, APOE4 genotype and disease stage were important factors on the baseline in the natural amyloid model. In APOE4 homozygous carriers mean baseline amyloid was increased compared to APOE4 non carriers. These results demonstrate natural progression of amyloid plaque in the continuum of AD.
Q2

Stronger together: a cross-SIG perspective on improving drug development
Fostvedt L., Zhou J., Kondic A.G., Androulakis I.P., Zhang T., Pryor M., Zhuang L., Elassaiss-Schaap J., Chan P., Moore H., Avedissian S.N., Tigh J., Goteti K., Thanneer N., Su J., et. al.
Q2
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

No QT interval prolongation effect of sepiapterin: a concentration-QTc analysis of pooled data from phase 1 and phase 3 studies in healthy volunteers and patients with phenylketonuria
Gao L., Hu Y., Smith N., Uvarov A., Peyret T., Gosselin N.H., Kong R.
Sepiapterin is an exogenously synthesized new chemical entity that is structurally equivalent to endogenous sepiapterin, a biological precursor of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), which is a cofactor for phenylalanine hydroxylase. Sepiapterin is being developed for the treatment of hyperphenylalaninemia in pediatric and adult patients with phenylketonuria (PKU). This study employed concentration-QT interval analysis to assess QT prolongation risk following sepiapterin treatment. Data from three phase 1 studies and one phase 3 study were pooled for this analysis. Pediatric and adult PKU patients ≥ 2 years received multiple doses at 60 mg/kg and adult healthy volunteers received a single or multiple doses at 20 or 60 mg/kg. Time-matched triplicate ECG measurements and plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected. Prespecified linear mixed models relating ΔQTcF to concentrations of sepiapterin and the major active circulating metabolite BH4 were developed for the analysis. The analysis demonstrated that there is no QTcF prolongation risk in patients with PKU following sepiapterin dosing at the highest therapeutic dose, 60 mg/kg/day. The final model showed a marginal but negligible QTcF reduction with increasing sepiapterin and BH4 concentrations. The effect on ΔQTcF was estimated to -2.72 [-3.72, -1.71] and − 1.25 [-2.75, 0.25] ms at mean baseline adjusted BH4 Cmax of 332 ng/mL (therapeutic exposure) and 675 ng/mL (supratherapeutic exposure) at dose 60 mg/kg, respectively, in PKU patients with food and in healthy volunteers with a high fat diet. Various covariates, such as clinical study ID, age, sex, food effect, race, body weight, and disease status, on QTcF interval were investigated and were found insignificant, except for food effect and age. This study concludes that there is no QTcF prolongation risk in patients with PKU following sepiapterin dosing up to 60 mg/kg/day, and BH4 and sepiapterin concentrations minimally affect ΔQTcF after adjustment for time, sex, and meal.
Q2

A physiologically-based quantitative systems pharmacology model for mechanistic understanding of the response to alogliptin and its application in patients with renal impairment
Shen C., Xie H., Jiang X., Wang L.
Alogliptin is a highly selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and primarily excreted as unchanged drug in the urine, and differences in clinical outcomes in renal impairment patients increase the risk of serious adverse reactions. In this study, we developed a comprehensive physiologically-based quantitative systematic pharmacology model of the alogliptin-glucose control system to predict plasma exposure and use glucose as a clinical endpoint to prospectively understand its therapeutic outcomes with varying renal function. Our model incorporates a PBPK model for alogliptin, DPP-4 activity described by receptor occupancy theory, and the crosstalk and feedback loops for GLP-1-GIP-glucagon, insulin, and glucose. Based on the optimization of renal function-dependent parameters, the model was extrapolated to different stages renal impairment patients. Ultimately our model adequately describes the pharmacokinetics of alogliptin, the progression of DPP-4 inhibition over time and the dynamics of the glucose control system components. The extrapolation results endorse the dose adjustment regimen of 12.5 mg once daily for moderate patients and 6.25 mg once daily for severe and ESRD patients, while providing additional reflections and insights. In clinical practice, our model could provide additional information on the in vivo fate of DPP4 inhibitors and key regulators of the glucose control system.
Q2

Do P-glycoprotein-mediated drug-drug interactions at the blood-brain barrier impact morphine brain distribution?
Gülave B., Lesmana A., de Lange E.C., van Hasselt J.C.
Abstract
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a key efflux transporter and may be involved in drug-drug interactions (DDIs) at the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which could lead to changes in central nervous system (CNS) drug exposure. Morphine is a P-gp substrate and therefore a potential victim drug for P-gp mediated DDIs. It is however unclear if P-gp inhibitors can induce clinically relevant changes in morphine CNS exposure. Here, we used a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-based approach to evaluate the potential impact of DDIs on BBB transport of morphine by clinically relevant P-gp inhibitor drugs.
The LeiCNS-PK3.0 PBPK model was used to simulate morphine distribution at the brain extracellular fluid (brainECF) for different clinical intravenous dosing regimens of morphine, alone or in combination with a P-gp inhibitor. We included 34 commonly used P-gp inhibitor drugs, with inhibitory constants and expected clinical P-gp inhibitor concentrations derived from literature. The DDI impact was evaluated by the change in brainECF exposure for morphine alone or in combination with different inhibitors. Our analysis demonstrated that P-gp inhibitors had a negligible effect on morphine brainECF exposure in the majority of simulated population, caused by low P-gp inhibition. Sensitivity analyses showed neither major effects of increasing the inhibitory concentration nor changing the inhibitory constant on morphine brainECF exposure. In conclusion, P-gp mediated DDIs on morphine BBB transport for the evaluated P-gp inhibitors are unlikely to induce meaningful changes in clinically relevant morphine CNS exposure. The developed CNS PBPK modeling approach provides a general approach for evaluating BBB transporter DDIs in humans.
Q2

Application of model-informed drug development (MIDD) for dose selection in regulatory submissions for drug approval in Japan
Sasaki T., Katsube T., Hayato S., Yamaguchi S., Tanaka J., Yoshimatsu H., Nakanishi Y., Kitamura A., Watase H., Suganami H., Matsuoka N., Hasegawa C.
Model-informed drug development (MIDD) is an approach to improve the efficiency of drug development. To promote awareness and application of MIDD in Japan, the Data Science Expert Committee of the Drug Evaluation Committee in the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association established a task force, which surveyed MIDD applications for approved products in Japan. This study aimed to reveal the trends and challenges in the use of MIDD by analyzing the survey results. A total of 322 cases approved in Japan between January 2020 and March 2022 as medical products were included in the survey. Modeling analysis was performed in approximately half of the cases (47.8% [154/322]) and formed a major basis for the selection or justification of dosage and administration in approximately one-fourth of the cases [24.2% (78/322)]. Modeling analysis/model-based dose selection was frequently conducted in cases involving monoclonal antibodies, first indication, orphan drugs, and multi-regional trials. Moreover, the survey results indicated that modeling analyses contributed to dose optimization throughout the developmental phases, including changing dose levels from phase II to phase III and dose adjustment in special populations. Japanese data were included in most cases in which modeling analysis was used for dosage selection. Thus, modelling analysis may also address ethnic factors introduced in the ICH E5 and/or E17 guidelines. In summary, this survey is useful for understanding the current status of MIDD use in Japan and for future drug development.
Q2

Novel endpoints based on tumor size ratio to support early clinical decision-making in oncology drug-development
Chakraborty S., Aggarwal K., Chowdhury M., Hamada I., Hu C., Kondic A., Mishra K., Paulucci D., Tiwari R., Appanna K.V., Balan M.M., Kumar A.
In oncology drug development, overall response rate (ORR) is commonly used as an early endpoint to assess the clinical benefits of new interventions; however, ORR benefit may not always translate into a long-term clinical benefit such as overall survival (OS). Most of the work on developing endpoints based on tumor growth dynamics relies on empirical validation, leading to a lack of generalizability of the endpoints across indications and therapeutic modalities. Additionally, many of these metrics are model-based and do not use data from all the patients. The objective of this work is to use longitudinal tumor size data and new lesion information (that is, the same information used by the ORR) to develop novel endpoints that can improve early clinical decision-making compared to the ORR. We investigate in this work multiple candidate novel endpoints based on tumor size ratio that utilize longitudinal tumor size data from all the patients regardless of their follow-up, rely only on tumor size and new lesion information, and are model-free. An extensive simulation study is conducted, exploring a wide spectrum of tumor size data and overall survival outcomes by modulating a variety of trial characteristics such as slow vs fast tumor growth, high vs low drug efficacy rates, variability in patients’ responses, variations in the number of patients, follow-up periods, new lesion rates and survival curve shapes. The proposed novel endpoints based on tumor size ratio consistently outperform the ORR by having a comparable or higher correlation with the OS. Further, the novel endpoints exhibit superior accuracy compared to the ORR in predicting the long-term OS benefit. Retrospective empirical validation on BMS clinical trials confirms our simulation findings. These findings suggest that the tumor size ratio-based endpoints could replace ORR for early clinical decision-making in oncology drug development.
Q2

Translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling of the anti-ADAMTS-5 NANOBODY® (M6495) using the neo-epitope ARGS as a biomarker
Pereira J.N., Ottevaere I., Serruys B., Guehring H., Ladel C., Lindemann S.
M6495 is a first-in-class NANOBODY® molecule and an inhibitor of ADAMTS-5, with the potential to be a disease modifying osteoarthritis drug. In order to investigate the PK/PD (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) properties of M6495, a single dose study was performed in cynomolgus monkeys with doses up to 6 mg/kg, with the goal of understanding the PK/PD properties of M6495. The neo-epitope ARGS (Alanine-Arginine-Glycine-Serine) generated by cleavage of aggrecan by ADAMTS-5 was used as a target-engagement biomarker. A long-lasting dose-dependent decrease in serum ARGS could be observed after a single dose of M6495 in cynomolgus monkeys. The serum biomarker ARGS decreased to levels below the limit of quantification of the assay in animals which received doses of M6495 of 6 mg/kg and higher, indicating a strong inhibition of ADAMTS-5. Data from the single-dose PK/PD study was combined with data from a multiple dose study, and a non-linear mixed effects model was used to explore the relationship between plasma concentrations of M6495 and the reduction of serum ARGS. The model was subsequently used to inform the clinical phase 1 study design and was successful in predicting the human clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of M6495. In addition to having enabled a Phase 1 trial with M6495, this is the first PK/PD model describing the pharmacodynamics of the neo-epitope ARGS after ADAMTS5 inhibition. It is expected that in the future, this model can be used or adapted to explore the PK/PD relationship between M6495 serum concentrations and the ARGS serum biomarker.
Q2

QSP modeling of a transiently inactivating antibody-drug conjugate highlights benefit of short antibody half life
Khera E., Dharmarajan L., Hainzl D., Engelhardt V., Vostiarova H., Davis J., Ebel N., Wuersch K., Romanet V., Sharaby S., Kearns J.D.
Antibody drug conjugates (ADC) are a promising class of oncology therapeutics consisting of an antibody conjugated to a payload via a linker. DYP688 is a novel ADC comprising of a signaling protein inhibitor payload (FR900359) that undergoes unique on-antibody inactivation in plasma, resulting in complex pharmacology. To assess the impact of FR inactivation on DYP688 pharmacology and clinical developability, we performed translational modeling of preclinical PK and tumor growth inhibition (TGI) data, accompanied by mechanistic Krogh cylinder tumor modeling. Using a PK-TGI model, we identified a composite exposure-above-tumorostatic concentration (AUCTSC) metric as the PK-driver of efficacy. To underpin the mechanisms behind AUCTSC as the driver of efficacy, we performed quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling of DYP688 intratumoral pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Through exploratory simulations, we show that by deviating from canonical ADC design dogma, DYP688 has optimal FR900359 activity despite its transient inactivation. Finally, we performed the successful preclinical to clinical translation of DYP688 PK, including the payload inactivation kinetics, evidenced by good agreement of the predicted PK to the observed interim clinical PK. Overall, this work highlights early quantitative pharmacokinetics as a missing link in the ADC design-developability chasm.
Q2

A PopPBPK-RL approach for precision dosing of benazepril in renal impaired patients
Vigueras G., Muñoz-Gil L., Reinisch V., Pinto J.T.
Current treatment recommendations mainly rely on rule-based protocols defined from evidence-based clinical guidelines, which are difficult to adapt for high-risk patients such as those with renal impairment. Consequently, unsuccessful therapies and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions are common. Within the context of personalized medicine, that tries to deliver the right treatment dose to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity, the concept of model-informed precision dosing proposes the use of mechanistic models, like physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, to predict drug regimes outcomes. Nonetheless, PBPK models have limited capability when computing patients’ centric optimized drug doses. Consequently, reinforcement learning (RL) has been previously used to personalize drug dosage. In this work we propose the first PBPK and RL-based precision dosing system for an orally taken drug (benazepril) considering a virtual population of patients with renal disease. Population based PBPK modeling is used in combination with RL for obtaining patient tailored dose regimes. We also perform patient stratification and feature selection to better handle dose tailoring problems. Based on patients’ characteristics with best predictive capabilities, benazepril dose regimes are obtained for a population with features’ diversity. Obtained regimes are evaluated based on PK parameters considered. Results show that the proof-of-concept approach herein is capable of learning good dosing regimes for most patients. The use of a PopPBPK model allowed to account for intervariability of patient characteristics and be more inclusive considering also non-frequent patients. Impact analysis of patients’ features reveals that renal impairment is the main driver affecting RL capabilities.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
Visual Communication
475 citations, 5.75%
|
|
Social Semiotics
235 citations, 2.85%
|
|
Discourse, Context and Media
105 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Discourse and Communication
73 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Semiotica
72 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Visual Studies
64 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Critical Discourse Studies
60 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Multimodal Communication
57 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Journal of Pragmatics
50 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
47 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Multimodality & Society
46 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Discourse and Society
44 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Journal of Language and Politics
42 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journalism Studies
42 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Visual Communication Quarterly
39 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Linguistics and Education
38 citations, 0.46%
|
|
New Media and Society
36 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
34 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Media, Culture and Society
34 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture
34 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Visual Literacy
34 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Linguistic Landscape An international journal
33 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Frontiers in Communication
32 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
32 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journalism
31 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Pragmatics and Beyond New Series
29 citations, 0.35%
|
|
SAGE Open
29 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journalism Practice
26 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Chinese Semiotic Studies
26 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Qualitative Research
25 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Convergence
24 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Dynamics and Terminology
23 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Text and Talk
22 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Information Communication and Society
22 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy
22 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Language and Communication
21 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Digital Journalism
20 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Continuum
20 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Discourse Studies
20 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Metaphor and the Social World
20 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Sustainability
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Multilingualism
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Media, War and Conflict
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Social Media and Society
17 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
16 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Literacy
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Communication Gazette
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Emotion, Space and Society
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Classroom Discourse
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
English for Specific Purposes
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Language and Intercultural Communication
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Qualitative Inquiry
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Geoforum
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Photographies
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Critical Arts
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Communication
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Australian Journal of Language and Literacy
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
PLoS ONE
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Revista Brasileira de Linguistica Aplicada
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
The International Journal of Qualitative Methods
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Science Education
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Metaphor and Symbol
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Language and Education
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Education Sciences
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Written Communication
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Sociolinguistics
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Learning, Media and Technology
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Press/Politics
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Computers and Composition
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Cultural Studies
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Communication Methods and Measures
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
TESOL Quarterly
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Tourism Management
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Annals of Tourism Research
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Feminist Media Studies
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Memory Studies
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Digital Creativity
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
English Teaching
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Television and New Media
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Argumentation in Context
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
DELTA Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Space and Culture
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
World Englishes
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Social and Cultural Geography
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Internet Pragmatics
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Food, Culture and Society
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Pedagogies
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1853 citations, 22.45%
|
|
SAGE
1462 citations, 17.71%
|
|
Elsevier
621 citations, 7.52%
|
|
Springer Nature
601 citations, 7.28%
|
|
Wiley
457 citations, 5.54%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
390 citations, 4.72%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
321 citations, 3.89%
|
|
Emerald
164 citations, 1.99%
|
|
MDPI
125 citations, 1.51%
|
|
IGI Global
117 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
98 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
95 citations, 1.15%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
92 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
73 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Oxford University Press
66 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
37 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Duke University Press
36 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Intellect
36 citations, 0.44%
|
|
SciELO
33 citations, 0.4%
|
|
OpenEdition
33 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
19 citations, 0.23%
|
|
MIT Press
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
17 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Australian Reading Association
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Brill
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Academy of Management
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Hans Publishers
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
University of Warsaw
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOS Press
7 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
7 citations, 0.08%
|
|
JMIR Publications
7 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
7 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IOP Publishing
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
CAIRN
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Editora Edgard Blucher, Ltda.
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
EDP Sciences
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Goteborg University
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AOSIS
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Berghahn Books
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Annual Reviews
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Human Kinetics
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Cogitatio
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Bialystok
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Grupo Comunicar, Colectivo Andaluz de Educacion en Medios de Comunicacion
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Anadolu University, Faculty of Communication Sciences
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
BMJ
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Bristol University Press
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Westminster Press
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AIP Publishing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Illinois Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Early Childhood Australia
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centro de Estudos Educacao e Sociedade - CEDES
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ministere de la Culture
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Nakom
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Volgograd State University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Advertising Research Foundation
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PERSEE Program
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Documentation Centre (EKT)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
24 publications, 3.04%
|
|
University of New South Wales
22 publications, 2.79%
|
|
Cardiff University
13 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Macquarie University
12 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University of Sydney
11 publications, 1.39%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
10 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
10 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University College London
9 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Lancaster University
9 publications, 1.14%
|
|
University of Leeds
9 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Örebro University
7 publications, 0.89%
|
|
National University of Singapore
7 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Georgetown University
7 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
6 publications, 0.76%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
6 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
6 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Sheffield
6 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Lund University
5 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Helsinki
5 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
5 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
5 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Kingston University
5 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Cape Town
5 publications, 0.63%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
5 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Bremen
5 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Stockholm University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
David Yellin College of Education
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Western Sydney University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Aalborg University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Melbourne
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Queensland
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Arizona State University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
North Carolina State University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Washington
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Groningen
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
York University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Leicester
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport
4 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Tampere University
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Jinan University
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Bologna
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Oxford
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Oslo
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Antwerp
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Loughborough University
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Massey University
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Macau
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Salzburg
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Sussex
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Louisiana State University
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Texas Tech University
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Portland State University
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Plymouth
3 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Izmir University of Economics
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Yasar University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Liège
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Malaya
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Malmö University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
South China Normal University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Basel
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Cambridge
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Lapland
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Liverpool
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
King's College London
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Manchester
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Southern California
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Southampton
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Auckland
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Waikato
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of South Australia
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Canberra
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Seoul National University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Virginia Tech
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Aberystwyth University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Hunan University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Federal University of Santa Catarina
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of South Florida
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Crete
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Macau University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Universidad Andrés Bello
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
|
University of New South Wales
9 publications, 4.02%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
8 publications, 3.57%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
5 publications, 2.23%
|
|
Örebro University
4 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Helsinki
3 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Jinan University
3 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
3 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
3 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Sydney
3 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Arizona State University
3 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Lancaster University
3 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Groningen
3 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport
3 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Liège
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Malaya
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
South China Normal University
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Western Sydney University
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Lapland
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Liverpool
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Auckland
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Macquarie University
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Cape Town
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Hunan University
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Macau
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Salzburg
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Northumbria University
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Sheffield
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
2 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Payame Noor University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Guilan
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Tübingen
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Zhejiang University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Peking University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Yasar University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Tampere University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Wuhan University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Bern
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Basel
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Beijing Information Science and Technology University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Dundee
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Shanghai International Studies University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Bergen
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
United International College
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
National Taiwan University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Kingston University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Drexel University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Loughborough University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Huaqiao University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of South-Eastern Norway
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Roma Tre University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Waikato
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Murdoch University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Southern Queensland
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Southern Cross University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Stanford University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Rhodes University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Durban University of Technology
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Mahidol University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Washington State University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Obafemi Awolowo University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Kookmin University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Pannonia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Federal University of Santa Catarina
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of South Florida
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Macau University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Universidad Andrés Bello
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
City University of Macau
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Seville
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Tilburg University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Utrecht University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 148, 18.76%
United Kingdom
148 publications, 18.76%
|
USA
|
USA, 116, 14.7%
USA
116 publications, 14.7%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 95, 12.04%
Australia
95 publications, 12.04%
|
China
|
China, 42, 5.32%
China
42 publications, 5.32%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 26, 3.3%
Sweden
26 publications, 3.3%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 24, 3.04%
Canada
24 publications, 3.04%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 23, 2.92%
Germany
23 publications, 2.92%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 20, 2.53%
Denmark
20 publications, 2.53%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 20, 2.53%
Netherlands
20 publications, 2.53%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 16, 2.03%
Italy
16 publications, 2.03%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 12, 1.52%
Finland
12 publications, 1.52%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 11, 1.39%
New Zealand
11 publications, 1.39%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 10, 1.27%
Iraq
10 publications, 1.27%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 10, 1.27%
Singapore
10 publications, 1.27%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 9, 1.14%
Israel
9 publications, 1.14%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 9, 1.14%
Norway
9 publications, 1.14%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 9, 1.14%
South Africa
9 publications, 1.14%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 8, 1.01%
Belgium
8 publications, 1.01%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 8, 1.01%
Brazil
8 publications, 1.01%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 7, 0.89%
Austria
7 publications, 0.89%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 0.89%
Spain
7 publications, 0.89%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 0.89%
Turkey
7 publications, 0.89%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 7, 0.89%
Switzerland
7 publications, 0.89%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 6, 0.76%
Japan
6 publications, 0.76%
|
France
|
France, 5, 0.63%
France
5 publications, 0.63%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 0.51%
Egypt
4 publications, 0.51%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 0.51%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 0.51%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 4, 0.51%
Chile
4 publications, 0.51%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.38%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.38%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.38%
Greece
3 publications, 0.38%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.38%
Iran
3 publications, 0.38%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.38%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.38%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 0.38%
Nigeria
3 publications, 0.38%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.38%
Romania
3 publications, 0.38%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.25%
Russia
2 publications, 0.25%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.25%
India
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.25%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.25%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.25%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.13%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.13%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.13%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.13%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.13%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.13%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.13%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.13%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.13%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.13%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.13%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.13%
UAE
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.13%
Oman
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.13%
Poland
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.13%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.13%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.13%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Show all (25 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Australia
|
Australia, 26, 11.61%
Australia
26 publications, 11.61%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 26, 11.61%
United Kingdom
26 publications, 11.61%
|
China
|
China, 23, 10.27%
China
23 publications, 10.27%
|
USA
|
USA, 21, 9.38%
USA
21 publications, 9.38%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 10, 4.46%
Netherlands
10 publications, 4.46%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 7, 3.13%
Finland
7 publications, 3.13%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 6, 2.68%
Germany
6 publications, 2.68%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 6, 2.68%
Italy
6 publications, 2.68%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 6, 2.68%
Sweden
6 publications, 2.68%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 4, 1.79%
Denmark
4 publications, 1.79%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 1.79%
New Zealand
4 publications, 1.79%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 1.79%
Switzerland
4 publications, 1.79%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 1.34%
Austria
3 publications, 1.34%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 1.34%
Egypt
3 publications, 1.34%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 3, 1.34%
Spain
3 publications, 1.34%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 1.34%
Canada
3 publications, 1.34%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 1.34%
Norway
3 publications, 1.34%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 1.34%
South Africa
3 publications, 1.34%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.89%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.89%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.89%
Iran
2 publications, 0.89%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.89%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.89%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.89%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.89%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.89%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.89%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.89%
Chile
2 publications, 0.89%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.45%
Russia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.45%
France
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.45%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.45%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.45%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.45%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.45%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.45%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.45%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.45%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.45%
UAE
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.45%
Poland
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.45%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.45%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.45%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.45%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.45%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.45%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.45%
Japan
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Show all (12 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
1 profile journal article
Rosa Virginia
2 publications
h-index: 0