Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
SJR
1.521
CiteScore
8.8
Categories
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Space and Planetary Science
Areas
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Physics and Astronomy
Years of issue
2005-2025
journal names
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
Top-3 citing journals

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
(38087 citations)

Astrophysical Journal
(23416 citations)

Astronomy and Astrophysics
(13891 citations)
Top-3 organizations

National Institute for Astrophysics
(310 publications)

University of Cambridge
(160 publications)

Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
(122 publications)

National Institute for Astrophysics
(58 publications)

University of Tokyo
(34 publications)

Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias
(33 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2850

Analysis of The Role of Deep Learning Models in Image Classification Applications
Li X.
Image classification is a fundamental task in computer science, underpinning various applications such as object detection, face recognition, and object interaction analysis. The concept holds significant value due to its wide-ranging applications across multiple fields. Traditional methods for image classification, however, have been limited by their slow processing speed, rigidity, and high costs. The integration of deep learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs), has revolutionized this process, enabling the development of automated, fast, and practical systems. These advanced models are now employed in diverse areas, including biomedical science, remote sensing, and business management, thanks to their ability to achieve high accuracy across a broad spectrum of scenarios. Training these models involves the use of well-known datasets like Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) and Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST), which provide the necessary data for optimization and validation. The paper examines the structure, functionality, advantages, and limitations of CNNs and SVMs in the context of image classification, demonstrating that deep learning-driven classification is now a mainstream research focus. This study highlights the transformative impact of these models and provides insights into their future potential.

Comparative Analysis of YOLO Variants Based on Performance Evaluation for Object Detection
Chen A.
This study focuses on analysing and exploring the You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm. Specifically, this article analyses the evolution and performance of three versions (YOLOv1, YOLOv5, and YOLOv8) in object detection. The research begins by detailing the fundamental concepts of object detection and the datasets commonly used in this field. It then delves into the specific architectures and experimental outcomes associated with each YOLO version. The analysis reveals that while YOLOv8 introduces advanced features and improvements, earlier versions like YOLOv5 may offer superior stability and performance under certain conditions, particularly in specific tasks such as car detection. The discussion emphasizes the significant impact of factors such as batch size on model performance, suggesting that fine-tuning these parameters can optimize the algorithm for particular applications. The study concludes that the future of YOLO development lies in exploring and refining different variants, particularly those of YOLOv8, to better meet diverse requirements. By focusing on five distinct YOLOv8 variants, the research aims to enhance the adaptability and effectiveness of the YOLO framework across a wide range of object detection challenges, thereby contributing valuable insights into the ongoing advancement of this technology.

Comparison of Fully Convolutional Networks and U-Net for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation
Jin Z.
Glaucoma, the leading cause of irreversible blindness, must be diagnosed early and thus treated in time. However, it has no noticeable symptoms in its early stages and may not be detected easily. This paper aims to compare two well-known convolutional neural network (CNN) structures, namely Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) and U-Net for the segmentation of the optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) from retinal fundus images which play an important role in glaucoma diagnosis. The performance of both models is assessed using qualitative parameters such as the Dice coefficient, Jaccard index, and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) error. In our experiment, the U-Net model yields more accurate segmentation results with 0.9601 average pixel accuracy and 0.9255 dice score for OD segmentation, outperforming the FCNs model with 0.9560 average pixel accuracy and 0.9132 dice score for OD segmentation. However, FCNs have a shorter inference time of 0. 0043 seconds against U-net’s 0. 0062 seconds making FCNs more suitable for real-time applications. The restrictions related to this study include biases from using only one dataset acquired from particular imaging devices, dependency on mask-based cropping techniques, and comparison being restricted to two fundamental architectures. This work presents the contribution of the deep learning models in improving glaucoma screening and therefore helping in avoiding blindness.

Sentiment Analysis of Mobile Phone Reviews Using XGBoost and Word Vectors
Wang Z.
Consumer reviews are an important source of data used to judge and examine consumer sentiment, and data mining for reviews of electronic products is an important way to help improve the design of electronic products. The research is based on the consumer reviews of online cell phone e-commerce, The paper constructs a sentiment dictionary in this field based on the Sentiment Oriented Point Mutual Information (SO-PMI) algorithm, and the sentiment weight of the review word vectors. An extreme Gradient Boosting Tree (XGBoost) is used to integrate word vectors and a Large Language Model (LLM) to construct a sentiment recognition model, and finally, a review sentiment index is derived, which unfolds from multiple dimensions to analyze the sentiment tendency in consumer reviews. The empirical analysis shows that the accuracy, recall, area under the curve (AUC), and other validation indexes of the constructed sentiment recognition model are further improved compared with the LLM model, which has a certain application value. When applying the weighted word vector method, the model has been significantly improved compared with the LLM model, the accuracy is increased by 5%, the accuracy is increased by 10%, and the comprehensive accuracy is increased by 2% after the comprehensive application of the two.

A Hybrid Machine Learning Framework for Soccer Match Outcome Prediction: Incorporating Bivariate Poisson Distribution
Chen Z.A.
The 2022 FIFA World Cup final attracted 1.5 billion viewers, while billions of dollars are wagered on soccer matches every year. The increasing demand for accurate predictions, both for academic research and betting purposes, has driven the development of advanced forecasting models. This study explores the application of mathematical and machine learning models to predict results of soccer matches, with the dual aim of academic advancement and profitable betting. The author utilizes a comprehensive dataset from top European leagues (2014-2022) and employ models including Bivariate Poisson Distribution, Naive Bayes, Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, and Gradient Boosting. The paper’s feature engineering combines historical match statistics, FIFA ratings, and betting odds. While Random Forests achieved the highest accuracy (56.25%), predicting draws remains challenging. The study highlights the potential for improved prediction systems and suggests future research in advanced draw prediction techniques and profitability analysis, the paper provides research directions for researchers in related fields.

The Applications and Prospects of Large Language Models in Traffic Flow Prediction
Liu Y.
Predicting traffic flow is crucial for the functionality of intelligent transportation systems. It is of critical importance to relieve traffic pressure, reduce accident rates, and alleviate environmental pollution. It is an important part of the construction of modern intelligent road networks. With advancements in deep learning (DL), DL models have made notable strides in prediction. However, due to the complexity and non-transparency of DL models themselves, there are still problems of low accuracy and interpretability in traffic flow prediction (TFP). Leveraging large language models (LLM) helps to improve the negative conditions caused by other DL models in prediction. This paper first briefly summarizes the basic characteristics of LLM and their advantages in TFP; then conducts relevant research and analysis in the order of experimental design steps comparison and results and conclusions comparison; then analyzes and discusses the current problems and challenges faced by LLM; finally, it looks forward to future research directions and development trends, and summarizes this paper.

Hierarchical Learning: A Hybrid of Federated Learning and Personalization Fine-Tuning
Li S., Zhang B.
Hierarchical Federated Learning (FL) presents a novel approach that combines global model training with localized personalization fine-tuning to enhance the predictive accuracy of decentralized machine learning systems. Traditional FL methods, which allow multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing raw data, are hindered by issues such as non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data, communication overhead, and limited generalization across diverse client datasets. This study proposes a hierarchical model that mitigates these challenges by incorporating a global model, trained using the Federated Averaging (FedAvg) algorithm, and applying client-specific fine-tuning to improve local model performance. The experiment conducted on a movie recommendation system demonstrates that this hierarchical approach significantly reduces the global model’s error while offering personalized improvements on client-specific datasets. Results show an average Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) reduction of 0.0460 following local personalization. This hybrid approach not only enhances model accuracy but also preserves data privacy and increases scalability, making it a promising solution for decentralized recommendation systems.

Research and Application of Heart Disease Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning
Bao Y.
As heart disease has become the leading cause of death worldwide, early and accurate prediction is crucial to help doctors make initial judgments about patients and improve their survival rates. This study aims to improve the accuracy and efficiency of heart disease prediction through Machine learning (ML) methods to help medical diagnosis. A heart disease dataset was used in the study, and multiple ML models were used to analyze multiple key health features, and the model performance was verified through a test set. This paper concludes that Logistic regression and random forests perform well in this task and have high practical value. Future research can stack models and optimize data sources to improve the practical performance of the model. This study provides a basic framework for building an intelligent medical auxiliary diagnosis system, which helps to achieve early prevention and timely judgment of heart disease, thereby improving the overall efficiency of medical services.

Advances in Image Generation Technology: Exploring GANs and MirrorGANs
Shi L.
This paper is an in-depth study by delving into the latest in image generation technology, where thesis is focusing on the Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and MirrorGANs possibilities. Image Generation is the backbone of visual computing, mostly utilized in intelligent designs. It is for this reason that this research aims at unravelling the theoretical basis and consolidated practices of GANs when it conies to generating both high-quality and semantically consistent imagery. The study will investigate the whole of the image generation process, starting from data preprocessing to the use of GANs to generate images from textual descriptions. The work discussed the relevance as well as the limitations of these technologies from the artistic point of view, medical imaging, and virtual reality. Tire article concludes that the paper sketches the data and experiments that show that the realism and richness hi picture quality are accentuated when GANs and MirrorGANs are incorporated. This suggests the scope of image-generation technology to enhance human-machine collaboration and allow for innovating hi smart tech. Further studies will be geared to enhancing these methods and consequently drawing humanity and machines closer, which hi nun will fuel the ongoing progress in this fast-paced sphere.

Effectiveness Evaluation of Random Forest, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machine Models for KDDCUP99 Anomaly Detection Based on K-means Clustering
Zhang M.
Security in the World Wide Web has recently seen an enormous upgrade in almost every aspect. Identifying malicious activities hi a network such as network attacks and malicious users plays a significant role hi these upgraded security directions. This research utilizes the KDDCUP99 dataset to incorporate K-means clustering with three classifiers: Random Forest (RF). Naïve Bayes (NB). and Support Vector Machine (SVM) with the goal to boost the accuracy of predicting network intrusions. In tins paper. K-means clustering technique is applied as a preprocessing step to enhance the overall quality of network intrusion detection and maximize the accuracy of the network security measures. The goal is to identify anomalies with high accuracy. Experimental results hidicate that the optimal combination is K-means + RF. which outperformed the others hi precision, recall, and Fl-score. Although K-means + NB demonstrated superior recall for certahi smaller anomalies, it underperformed compared to the RF model. The paper concludes by highlighting the value of ensemble approaches, in particular Random Forest, for tackling anomaly detection and network security issues, particularly hi light of the expanding significance of social networks and the internet.

Time Series Analysis: Application of LSTM model in predicting PM 2.5 concentration in Beijing
Yang R.
Air pollution forecasting for public health and policy-making has a critical importance, this paper employs a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model to perform in-depth prediction of PM2.5 concentrations measured at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, outperforming regular forecasting approaches. In the LSTM model, the research examines a very detailed hourly dataset and beats regular forecasting approaches. A key finding is the model’s ability to effectively generalize from historical data to predict future air quality trends, with its adeptness at handling time-dependent relationships. This research emphasizes the importance of LSTM in air pollution prediction and management in environmental science as it provides an effective means for planning and making decisions on air quality management. This research is of great importance in providing a groundwork for further enhancement of prediction modeling. By offering a more reliable and sophisticated picture of air quality variations, this study addresses the current problem about how urban air pollution control could be improved in the city.

Research on Analyzing the Emotional Polarity of Malicious Swipe Comments on E-commerce Platforms Based on NPL
Ren C.
In the era of rapid advancements in natural language processing (NLP) models, these technologies have immense potential to detect and address societal issues, enhancing the functioning of the digital society. Online shopping platforms rely heavily on user reviews to influence buyer decisions, yet malicious reviews can significantly degrade user experience. This study focuses on analyzing the emotional polarity of malicious brushorder (falsely generated) reviews in e-commerce product comments, utilizing the Jingdong product review dataset. The methodology involves utilizing the Word2Vec model to vectorize the text data, followed by principal component analysis (PCA) for outlier detection to identify potential malicious reviews based on their unique characteristics. The PCA results are further leveraged for dimensionality reduction, simplifying the dataset. Subsequently, the BERT model is employed to perform semantic similarity analysis, allowing for the screening and expansion of the experimental dataset with similar malicious comments. This enriched dataset is then subjected to sentiment polarity analysis, enabling a deeper tinderstanding of the nature and impact of these malicious reviews. By facilitating buyers in making informed decisions based on genuine reviews, this research underscores the practical value of NLP hi addressing real-world challenges in e-commerce.

The Use of Natural Language Processing Model in Literary Style Analysis of Chinese Text
Ye J.
In recent years, research on Natural Language Processing (NLP) has made consistent progress and has become a popular topic. As a promising branch of Machine Learning, NLP focuses on the understanding, generating and analysing of human languages. The applications of NLP include chatbots and language translation. This paper represents a HanLP based NLP model. The model is capable of analysing the literary style of given Chinese text by quantifying the literary style of the text on the basis of five fundamental elements, namely literary grace, sentiments, momentum, climate and lingering charm. This paper presents the input and output data of the research and conducts analyses on these data. Moreover, this paper draws a conclusion on the deviation rate and robustness of the model. It is reckoned that this model initially possesses the function of literary style analysis of Chinese text. The research, per se, along with its data, is capable of being reference for research in NLP and related fields.

Sql injection detection using Naïve Bayes classifier: A probabilistic approach for web application security
Lu Z.
A pervasive security issue in web applications is database injection, enabling attackers to alter SQL queries in order to get unauthorized access to confidential information. Using the Naive Bayes classifier, a probabilistic model specifically developed for text classification tasks, this work introduces a novel method for detecting SQL injection vulnerabilities.The process begins by collecting and organizing a comprehensive dataset, which includes both harmful and non-malicious SQL queries. Feature extraction is later employed to identify patterns and characteristics commonly associated with SQL injection, such as certain SQL clauses and logical operators. This collection of attributes is employed to generate a feature vector that serves as the input for the Naive Bayes classification algorithms. The classifier is trained using a labeled dataset and then learns to distinguish between benign and malicious requests by assessing their computed probabilities. Conventional measures such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score are employed to assess the model’s ability in correctly identifying SQL while reducing false positive classifications.The present study demonstrates the potential of Naive Bayes in enhancing online application security by providing a methodical and scalable strategy for identifying SQL injection attacks.

Image Inpainting of Portraits Artwork Design and Implementation
Zhang H.
In modern society, the restoration of artwork has become increasingly important. Generative models can provide reference images for the damaged or blurred core areas of these artworks. This paper simulates artificial damage to classic portrait paintings in the Art Portraits dataset by adding center masks during data preprocessing and then implements the image inpainting task. During the training phase, the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) is fine-tuned by progressively adding noise to the center-masked images in the noising stage, followed by denoising in the denoising stage to generate images. The generated images are compared with the original undamaged images through loss calculations to optimize the model. Additionally, a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), which has shown promising results on other datasets, is used as a baseline for comparison. The damaged images are used as inputs, and the generated images are compared to the ground truth to evaluate the performance of both models. In the testing phase, two widely used metrics in image evaluation, Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), are introduced to assess the performance. The fine-tuned DDPM achieves an MSE of 0.2622 and an FID of 16.85, while the GAN scores 0.2835 and 22.78, respectively. Since lower values indicate higher fidelity in reproducing the original image, which is crucial for art restoration, the conclusion drawn from this paper is that the fine-tuned DDPM demonstrates higher accuracy and is more suitable for restoration projects related to Art Portraits.
Top-100
Citing journals
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
|
|
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
38087 citations, 32.28%
|
|
Astrophysical Journal
23416 citations, 19.85%
|
|
Astronomy and Astrophysics
13891 citations, 11.77%
|
|
Astrophysical Journal Letters
3875 citations, 3.28%
|
|
Physical Review D
3777 citations, 3.2%
|
|
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
2405 citations, 2.04%
|
|
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
2201 citations, 1.87%
|
|
Astronomical Journal
2049 citations, 1.74%
|
|
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
1403 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series
1315 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics
852 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Publication of the Astronomical Society of Japan
664 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Universe
640 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Galaxies
637 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Astronomische Nachrichten
568 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Space Science Reviews
542 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
535 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Physical Review Letters
497 citations, 0.42%
|
|
European Physical Journal C
474 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Astrophysics and Space Science
471 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
460 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Nature Astronomy
457 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Nature
430 citations, 0.36%
|
|
New Astronomy Reviews
405 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Physics of the Dark Universe
381 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
363 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Journal of Modern Physics D
349 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Classical and Quantum Gravity
346 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
340 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
324 citations, 0.27%
|
|
New Astronomy
308 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
298 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy
285 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Astrophysics and Space Science Library
275 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of High Energy Astrophysics
242 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Physics Reports
219 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Astronomy Reports
216 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Astronomy Letters
204 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Advances in Space Research
198 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics
192 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Physical Review C
181 citations, 0.15%
|
|
EPJ Web of Conferences
177 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Icarus
177 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Living Reviews in Relativity
170 citations, 0.14%
|
|
The Earth's Cryosphere and Sea Level Change
156 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Red Giants as Probes of the Structure and Evolution of the Milky Way
148 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy
147 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Science
147 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of High Energy Physics
140 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Reports on Progress in Physics
139 citations, 0.12%
|
|
EAS Publications Series
138 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Astroparticle Physics
135 citations, 0.11%
|
|
European Physical Journal Plus
133 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Experimental Astronomy
133 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Plasma Physics
132 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Research Notes of the AAS
131 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Advances in Astronomy
122 citations, 0.1%
|
|
General Relativity and Gravitation
118 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Astrophysical Bulletin
118 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Springer Theses
112 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Modern Physics Letters A
111 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Reviews of Modern Physics
100 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Physics of Plasmas
100 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Planetary Science Journal
97 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
95 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Solar Physics
90 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Planetary and Space Science
86 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Astronomy and Astrophysics Library
84 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Astronomy and Computing
83 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Symmetry
80 citations, 0.07%
|
|
ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
77 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics
69 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
68 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Physica Scripta
67 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Chinese Physics C
65 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Physical Review E
64 citations, 0.05%
|
|
European Physical Journal A
64 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk
61 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Astronomy and Geophysics
60 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Astrophysics
58 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Physics-Uspekhi
58 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Astrobiology
58 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
56 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
55 citations, 0.05%
|
|
International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series
54 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Nature Communications
53 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics
52 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics
51 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Royal Society Open Science
50 citations, 0.04%
|
|
New Journal of Physics
47 citations, 0.04%
|
|
International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics
46 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Physics
45 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Living Reviews in Solar Physics
45 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
41 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
40 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Journal of Astrobiology
40 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics
40 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Annalen der Physik
38 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
37 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Chinese Physics Letters
37 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
|
|
Oxford University Press
41345 citations, 35.04%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
29178 citations, 24.73%
|
|
EDP Sciences
14212 citations, 12.05%
|
|
IOP Publishing
6472 citations, 5.49%
|
|
Springer Nature
5857 citations, 4.96%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
4745 citations, 4.02%
|
|
Elsevier
3300 citations, 2.8%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
3217 citations, 2.73%
|
|
MDPI
1556 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Wiley
792 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
690 citations, 0.58%
|
|
World Scientific
636 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Annual Reviews
604 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
356 citations, 0.3%
|
|
AIP Publishing
269 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
192 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Science in China Press
171 citations, 0.14%
|
|
The Royal Society
170 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
150 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
150 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
127 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
124 citations, 0.11%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
88 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
80 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
65 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
65 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
62 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
59 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
59 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
49 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Mineralogical Society of America
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Copernicus
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Astronomical Society of Korea
16 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Open Journal
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Stichting SciPost
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IntechOpen
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Astronomical Observatory
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
RIOR Publishing Center
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SAGE
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korean Space Science Society
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Academy
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics (NAS Ukraine)
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korean Astronomical Society
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
5 citations, 0%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
4 citations, 0%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
4 citations, 0%
|
|
Hans Publishers
4 citations, 0%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
3 citations, 0%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
3 citations, 0%
|
|
3 citations, 0%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
3 citations, 0%
|
|
Allerton Press
3 citations, 0%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 citations, 0%
|
|
proceedings of the vldb endowment
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
2 citations, 0%
|
|
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT)
2 citations, 0%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
2 citations, 0%
|
|
ASME International
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Portico
2 citations, 0%
|
|
SciELO
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Infra-M Academic Publishing House
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Physical Society of Japan
2 citations, 0%
|
|
The Laser Society of Japan
2 citations, 0%
|
|
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Editora Edgard Blucher, Ltda.
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
2 citations, 0%
|
|
Emerald
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 citation, 0%
|
|
University of California Press
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
1 citation, 0%
|
|
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Higher Education Press
1 citation, 0%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
1 citation, 0%
|
|
American Mathematical Society
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Scientific Publishers
1 citation, 0%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
1 citation, 0%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
1 citation, 0%
|
|
University of Warsaw
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Academic Publication Council - Kuwait University
1 citation, 0%
|
|
1 citation, 0%
|
|
The Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear Fusion Research (JSPF)
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Mathematical Sciences Publishers
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
1 citation, 0%
|
|
VTeX
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Bialystok University of Technology
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
National Institute for Astrophysics
310 publications, 8.33%
|
|
University of Cambridge
160 publications, 4.3%
|
|
Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
122 publications, 3.28%
|
|
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias
117 publications, 3.14%
|
|
University of Oxford
112 publications, 3.01%
|
|
University of Leicester
101 publications, 2.71%
|
|
European Southern Observatory
99 publications, 2.66%
|
|
University College London
98 publications, 2.63%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
97 publications, 2.61%
|
|
Leiden University
96 publications, 2.58%
|
|
University of La Laguna
96 publications, 2.58%
|
|
University of Southampton
91 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Sorbonne University
90 publications, 2.42%
|
|
University of Tokyo
90 publications, 2.42%
|
|
Brera Astronomical Observatory
82 publications, 2.2%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
81 publications, 2.18%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy
73 publications, 1.96%
|
|
Observatoire de Paris
72 publications, 1.93%
|
|
Durham University
70 publications, 1.88%
|
|
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
69 publications, 1.85%
|
|
University of Manchester
68 publications, 1.83%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
67 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Paris Cité University
67 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
66 publications, 1.77%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
66 publications, 1.77%
|
|
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
63 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy
63 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Goddard Space Flight Center
63 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
58 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Astronomical Observatory of Padova
57 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
57 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Heidelberg University
53 publications, 1.42%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
53 publications, 1.42%
|
|
University of Warwick
51 publications, 1.37%
|
|
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences
50 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Australian National University
49 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Astronomical Observatory of Rome
49 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory
49 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
48 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
48 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of St Andrews
48 publications, 1.29%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
48 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Imperial College London
47 publications, 1.26%
|
|
National Institute for Nuclear Physics
45 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
45 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Stockholm University
44 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
44 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Sydney
44 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam
44 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Sheffield
44 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Padua
43 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
42 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Bologna
42 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Arizona
42 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Space Telescope Science Institute
42 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
41 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Victoria
41 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics
40 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of New South Wales
40 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica di Milano
40 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
40 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Paris Sciences et Lettres
40 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Columbia University
39 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Toronto
39 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Monash University
38 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
38 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Princeton University
37 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences
37 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
36 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Geneva
36 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Birmingham
36 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Cape Town
35 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Curtin University
34 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Keele University
34 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy
34 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
33 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Nottingham
33 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Western Australia
33 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
33 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Kyoto University
32 publications, 0.86%
|
|
National Institute for Aerospace Technology
31 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Michigan
30 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Groningen
30 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
29 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
29 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
29 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
29 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Université Côte d'Azur
29 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
28 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Zurich
28 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
28 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Cardiff University
28 publications, 0.75%
|
|
SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research
28 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
27 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Scuola Normale Superiore
27 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Stanford University
27 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Harvard University
27 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
27 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
27 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
27 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
National Institute for Astrophysics
58 publications, 6.9%
|
|
University of Tokyo
34 publications, 4.04%
|
|
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias
33 publications, 3.92%
|
|
University of La Laguna
30 publications, 3.57%
|
|
University of Cambridge
29 publications, 3.45%
|
|
University of Oxford
27 publications, 3.21%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
27 publications, 3.21%
|
|
Sorbonne University
26 publications, 3.09%
|
|
Leiden University
26 publications, 3.09%
|
|
European Southern Observatory
25 publications, 2.97%
|
|
University of Southampton
24 publications, 2.85%
|
|
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
24 publications, 2.85%
|
|
Observatoire de Paris
23 publications, 2.73%
|
|
Paris Sciences et Lettres
20 publications, 2.38%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
19 publications, 2.26%
|
|
University College London
18 publications, 2.14%
|
|
University of Warwick
18 publications, 2.14%
|
|
National Institute for Nuclear Physics
18 publications, 2.14%
|
|
Astronomical Observatory of Padova
18 publications, 2.14%
|
|
Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
18 publications, 2.14%
|
|
University of Leicester
18 publications, 2.14%
|
|
Goddard Space Flight Center
18 publications, 2.14%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
17 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
16 publications, 1.9%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
16 publications, 1.9%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
15 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
15 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Cape Town
15 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Arizona
15 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Durham University
14 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Monash University
14 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Kyoto University
14 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of Groningen
14 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of Manchester
13 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
13 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy
13 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy
13 publications, 1.55%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
13 publications, 1.55%
|
|
University of Geneva
12 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Curtin University
12 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
12 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam
12 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy
12 publications, 1.43%
|
|
University of Toronto
12 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Université Côte d'Azur
12 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Stockholm University
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Astrophysics and Space Science Observatory of Bologna
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Paris Cité University
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Space Telescope Science Institute
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Physical Research Laboratory
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Bologna
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Turku
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Northwestern University
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
10 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Australian National University
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Imperial College London
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of Padua
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Cornell University
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Brera Astronomical Observatory
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Princeton University
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
National University of La Plata
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Crimean Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Nanjing University
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Birmingham
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Astronomical Observatory of Rome
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Stanford University
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Ohio State University
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Guangxi University
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Sheffield
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Victoria
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Barcelona
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Institute of Astronomy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
New York University Abu Dhabi
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Zurich
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Nottingham
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1231, 33.07%
USA
1231 publications, 33.07%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1086, 29.18%
United Kingdom
1086 publications, 29.18%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 582, 15.64%
Germany
582 publications, 15.64%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 499, 13.41%
Italy
499 publications, 13.41%
|
France
|
France, 386, 10.37%
France
386 publications, 10.37%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 330, 8.87%
Spain
330 publications, 8.87%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 328, 8.81%
Australia
328 publications, 8.81%
|
China
|
China, 294, 7.9%
China
294 publications, 7.9%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 289, 7.76%
Netherlands
289 publications, 7.76%
|
India
|
India, 229, 6.15%
India
229 publications, 6.15%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 227, 6.1%
Canada
227 publications, 6.1%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 215, 5.78%
Japan
215 publications, 5.78%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 175, 4.7%
Chile
175 publications, 4.7%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 174, 4.67%
Russia
174 publications, 4.67%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 104, 2.79%
Switzerland
104 publications, 2.79%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 97, 2.61%
Sweden
97 publications, 2.61%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 96, 2.58%
Poland
96 publications, 2.58%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 90, 2.42%
Israel
90 publications, 2.42%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 88, 2.36%
South Africa
88 publications, 2.36%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 83, 2.23%
Brazil
83 publications, 2.23%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 72, 1.93%
Denmark
72 publications, 1.93%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 70, 1.88%
Mexico
70 publications, 1.88%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 64, 1.72%
Argentina
64 publications, 1.72%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 61, 1.64%
Belgium
61 publications, 1.64%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 51, 1.37%
Republic of Korea
51 publications, 1.37%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 43, 1.16%
Finland
43 publications, 1.16%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 37, 0.99%
Greece
37 publications, 0.99%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 32, 0.86%
Ireland
32 publications, 0.86%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 31, 0.83%
Czech Republic
31 publications, 0.83%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 29, 0.78%
Austria
29 publications, 0.78%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 28, 0.75%
Hungary
28 publications, 0.75%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 25, 0.67%
Portugal
25 publications, 0.67%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 18, 0.48%
Ukraine
18 publications, 0.48%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 17, 0.46%
UAE
17 publications, 0.46%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 16, 0.43%
New Zealand
16 publications, 0.43%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 15, 0.4%
Turkey
15 publications, 0.4%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 13, 0.35%
Norway
13 publications, 0.35%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 9, 0.24%
Romania
9 publications, 0.24%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 8, 0.21%
Colombia
8 publications, 0.21%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 8, 0.21%
Slovakia
8 publications, 0.21%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 8, 0.21%
Thailand
8 publications, 0.21%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 7, 0.19%
Croatia
7 publications, 0.19%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 6, 0.16%
Estonia
6 publications, 0.16%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 6, 0.16%
Georgia
6 publications, 0.16%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 5, 0.13%
Bulgaria
5 publications, 0.13%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 5, 0.13%
Iran
5 publications, 0.13%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 5, 0.13%
Cyprus
5 publications, 0.13%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 4, 0.11%
Armenia
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 4, 0.11%
Lithuania
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.11%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 4, 0.11%
Slovenia
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.08%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 3, 0.08%
Nepal
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.05%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.05%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0.05%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.05%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.03%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.03%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.03%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.03%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.03%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.03%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.03%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.03%
Malta
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.03%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.03%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Paraguay
|
Paraguay, 1, 0.03%
Paraguay
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.03%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.03%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.03%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (41 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 277, 32.94%
USA
277 publications, 32.94%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 214, 25.45%
United Kingdom
214 publications, 25.45%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 133, 15.81%
Germany
133 publications, 15.81%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 105, 12.49%
Italy
105 publications, 12.49%
|
China
|
China, 101, 12.01%
China
101 publications, 12.01%
|
France
|
France, 80, 9.51%
France
80 publications, 9.51%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 79, 9.39%
Spain
79 publications, 9.39%
|
India
|
India, 76, 9.04%
India
76 publications, 9.04%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 69, 8.2%
Japan
69 publications, 8.2%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 67, 7.97%
Australia
67 publications, 7.97%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 59, 7.02%
Netherlands
59 publications, 7.02%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 46, 5.47%
Russia
46 publications, 5.47%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 46, 5.47%
Canada
46 publications, 5.47%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 44, 5.23%
Chile
44 publications, 5.23%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 30, 3.57%
South Africa
30 publications, 3.57%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 29, 3.45%
Poland
29 publications, 3.45%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 27, 3.21%
Switzerland
27 publications, 3.21%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 26, 3.09%
Sweden
26 publications, 3.09%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 21, 2.5%
Brazil
21 publications, 2.5%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 21, 2.5%
Denmark
21 publications, 2.5%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 19, 2.26%
Mexico
19 publications, 2.26%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 19, 2.26%
Republic of Korea
19 publications, 2.26%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 17, 2.02%
Belgium
17 publications, 2.02%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 16, 1.9%
Argentina
16 publications, 1.9%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 16, 1.9%
Finland
16 publications, 1.9%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 15, 1.78%
Israel
15 publications, 1.78%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 10, 1.19%
Austria
10 publications, 1.19%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 10, 1.19%
Turkey
10 publications, 1.19%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 9, 1.07%
Ireland
9 publications, 1.07%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 9, 1.07%
Czech Republic
9 publications, 1.07%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 8, 0.95%
Hungary
8 publications, 0.95%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 8, 0.95%
UAE
8 publications, 0.95%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 7, 0.83%
Portugal
7 publications, 0.83%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 6, 0.71%
Ukraine
6 publications, 0.71%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 6, 0.71%
Greece
6 publications, 0.71%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 6, 0.71%
New Zealand
6 publications, 0.71%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 6, 0.71%
Norway
6 publications, 0.71%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 6, 0.71%
Thailand
6 publications, 0.71%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 5, 0.59%
Colombia
5 publications, 0.59%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 5, 0.59%
Slovakia
5 publications, 0.59%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 0.48%
Iran
4 publications, 0.48%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 3, 0.36%
Estonia
3 publications, 0.36%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 3, 0.36%
Armenia
3 publications, 0.36%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.36%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.36%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 3, 0.36%
Cyprus
3 publications, 0.36%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 3, 0.36%
Nepal
3 publications, 0.36%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.36%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.36%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.24%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.24%
Romania
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.24%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.12%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.12%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.12%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.12%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.12%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.12%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Show all (26 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
2 profile journal articles
Barone Vincenzo

Scuola Normale Superiore
955 publications,
90 755 citations
h-index: 101
2 profile journal articles
Trujillo Ignacio
173 publications,
9 727 citations
h-index: 55
2 profile journal articles
Horak Jiri
12 publications,
279 citations
h-index: 7
1 profile journal article
Grankin Konstantin
DSc in Physics and Mathematics

Crimean Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences
93 publications,
2 784 citations
h-index: 28
Research interests
Astrophysics
1 profile journal article
Zaggia Simone
182 publications,
7 139 citations
h-index: 50