Comptes Rendus de l Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
Comptes Rendus de l Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie
Top-3 citing journals

Comptes Rendus - Biologies
(137 citations)

PLoS ONE
(93 citations)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
(70 citations)
Top-3 organizations

French Institute of Health and Medical Research
(69 publications)

Institut Pasteur
(24 publications)

Sorbonne University
(22 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 9671
Q1

Factors influencing spatial variability in the trophic transfer of essential nutrients from plankton to European sardine (Sardina pilchardus)
Neven C.J., Soudant P., Marchal P., Lefebvre S., Lefebvre A., Wacquet G., Quere C., Pernet F., Giraldo C.
Abstract
Phytoplankton play a crucial role in marine food webs as they supply essential fatty acids (FA) to higher trophic levels, from small pelagic fish to top predators, through the intermediary action of zooplankton. Thus, the composition and nutritional value of plankton communities expectably influence abundance and condition of predators potentially leading to spatial variation in trophic transfer. Through the analysis of the FA profile of zooplankton and European sardine (Sardina pilchardus), and of the community composition of phytoplankton and zooplankton, we investigated (i) large-scale spatial variability in the trophic transfer of FA from plankton to small pelagic fish and (ii) the factors influencing this transfer in the English Channel. We found that the FA composition of zooplankton and sardine differed between the western and eastern basins of the English Channel (WEC and EEC, respectively), reflecting differences in plankton community composition. The FA profile of sardine varied further with regard to energy allocation strategies and conditions. This suggests a strong bottom-up influence of plankton community composition on the spatial variability of FA transfer with an additional impact of fish physiological status. Understanding the reasons behind the separation pattern of sardines between the WEC and the EEC would be helpful to inform fisheries and ecosystem-based management advice.
Q1

Q1

Prospective seaweed systems for North-West European waters
Zaat L.M., van den Burg S.W., Ketelaar T., Koppenberg M., Möhring N., Meuwissen M.P.
Abstract
Seaweed is a potential source of sustainable food, feed, cosmetics, biomaterials, and biostimulants. Seaweed is currently mainly grown in Asia, and it is unclear which seaweed systems are best suited for North-West European waters. We use an expert workshop and a written feedback round to identify prospective seaweed systems, including the cultivation site and post-harvest stages, for three different contexts. Independent of the context, there is a preference for cultivating multiple species and having a high level of automation. Depending on the context, the optimal choice with regards to scale, substrate, seeding technique, and the integration of seaweed farming with (shell)fish species differs. Profitability of the systems, availability of (large-scale) processing facilities and ships to go offshore, uncertainty of buyers, and obstacles in seed stock availability, permits, and building infrastructures present key challenges and risks. The identified seaweed systems serve as input to the policy debate around alternative resource production in Europe and can help in developing standards for seaweed system design. Furthermore, researchers and technology providers can use the prospective systems for future profitability assessments and directions for technology developments.
Q1

Misinterpreting retrospective patterns in fishery stock assessment
Cadrin S.X.
Abstract
Estimates of stock size for a specific year change when a new year of data is added to a stock assessment model, and some assessments exhibit a unidirectional pattern to these retrospective differences. Assuming that the most recent stock assessment is the most reliable, retrospective patterns are often misinterpreted as a measure of estimation bias that can be corrected. The logical fallacy of this interpretation is exposed when another new year of data is added, and the estimates that were assumed to be true are now considered to be biased. True values of estimated parameters are needed to infer bias. For example, simulation-estimation experiments can produce retrospective patterns from misspecified estimation models that assume time-varying processes are stationary. These simulations show that retrospective patterns are not a reliable measure of bias, and retrospective adjustments may be further from true values. Therefore, the terminology of retrospective “bias” and “correction” is misleading. Retrospective patterns can be an informative diagnostic to identify and confront model misspecification, and if retrospective patterns cannot be reduced with respecified models, they can be communicated as measure of uncertainty for consideration in the precautionary management.
Q1

On the Jurisdictional Situations of Arctic Large Marine Ecosystems
Soares de Oliveira C., Heinrich K.
Abstract
The Arctic Council has identified and delineated 18 large marine ecosystems (LMEs) to provide a basis for the implementation of the ecosystem approach to management (EAM) in the Arctic. However, the ‘natural boundaries’ of these LMEs largely misalign with the ‘artificial boundaries’ established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This raises the question of how EAM could be effectively implemented across diverse and multiple jurisdictions of the Arctic LMEs. By visualising the so-called jurisdictional situation of all 18 Arctic LMEs, this food-for-thought article highlights the inequitable and delicate position that the zonal approach of UNCLOS creates for the protection of Arctic LMEs.
Q1

Environment-driven trends in larval abundance predict fishery recruitment in two saltwater basses
Jarvis Mason E.T., Watson W., Ward E.J., Thompson A.R., Semmens B.X.
Abstract
Environmental and biological factors influencing fish larvae can drive fishery cohort strength, yet larval abundance is typically a better indicator of spawning biomass. Under a changing ocean, studies that explore the relationships between environmental variables, larval abundance, and fishery recruitment remain valuable areas for ongoing research. We focus on a popular, recreational-only, multispecies saltwater bass fishery (genus Paralabrax) whose population status and recovery potential are uncertain. We resolved Paralabrax spp. larval data to species over a 54-year period (1963–2016) and used species distribution models to (i) generate and test species-specific standardized indices of larval abundance as indicators of adult stock status and fishery recruitment and (ii) evaluate long-term spatiotemporal trends in their population dynamics relative to environmental variables and climate forcing. Contrary to initial hypotheses, species-specific larval abundance predicted future catches, with higher recent larval abundances suggesting potential for fishery recovery. Temperature, zooplankton biomass, and isothermal depth were important predictors of bass larval abundance, indicating these variables could also be valuable for predicting fishery recruitment and anticipating population change. Our findings paint a path forward towards a more ecosystem-based fishery management approach for this important fishery and may serve as a template for data- or assessment-limited fisheries.
Q1

Considerations for using sharks as ocean observing platforms
Wiernicki C.J., Curtis T.H., Block B.A., Shivji M.S., Vaudo J.J., Wetherbee B.M., Holland K.N., Pinti J., Oliver M.J., Carlisle A.B.
Abstract
The combination of animal-borne telemetry and oceanographic sensor technologies creates an opportunity for marine animals to serve as ocean observing platforms (OOPs), carrying tags that record in situ oceanographic data as they naturally move. In this study, we create a blueprint of shark OOP species selection, quantifying and comparing the potential for species to transmit collected data, the environmental ranges various candidates are expected to encounter, and the oceanographic features they may be expected to resolve. Metrics of data satellite transmission probability, movement behaviors, and environmental sampling ranges are calculated combining historically collected satellite tag data for 11 shark species tagged in the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean basins. Species with the highest satellite data transmission potential include shortfin mako (Atlantic and Pacific) and blue (Pacific) sharks. These species also demonstrated overlap in time and length scales for area-restricted search-like movement behaviors with several mesoscale ocean features, including hurricanes and upwelling events. Additional comparisons of decorrelation time scales between theoretical shark versus glider sampling platforms suggest that shark OOPs have the ability to provide three times more uncorrelated water column temperature and conductivity profiles than gliders at 15% of the operational cost.
Q1

A multifaceted citizen-science approach for characterizing shark depredation in Florida’s recreational fisheries
McCallister M.P., Brewster L., Dean C., Drymon J.M., Hutt C., Ostendorf T.J., Ajemian M.J.
Abstract
Depredation (i.e. partial removal of target catch prior to retrieval) caused by sharks is a prevalent issue affecting several fisheries in the southeastern USA. While US fisheries managers have begun monitoring shark depredation in commercial fisheries, there have been few attempts to quantify these interactions in the recreational fishing sector. To address this knowledge gap, we initiated a citizen-science-based project to provide an in-depth characterization of shark depredation in Florida’s recreational fisheries. This was done via multiple approaches, including social media content analysis, online angler surveys, and cooperative fishery-dependent charters. Across methodologies, snapper-grouper species were the most frequently depredated target species group, and bull and sandbar sharks were the most commonly identified depredating species. Forty-three percent of anglers experienced depredation, and the probability of experiencing depredation ranged from 10% to 60% and varied both regionally and seasonally. In addition, average depredation rates ranged from 31% to 47% and were within the range of reported rates from other recreational fisheries. These results will help build a comprehensive understanding of this human-wildlife conflict and could aid fishery managers in developing management measures to address this fisheries conflict. Furthermore, this study highlights the benefit of incorporating citizen science when addressing complex fisheries issues involving stakeholder conflict.
Q1

DNA metabarcoding captures temporal and vertical dynamics of mesozooplankton communities
Novotny A., Rodrigues C., Jacquemot L., Clemente-Carvalho R.B., Piercey R.S., Morien E., Galbraith M., Kellogg C.T., Lemay M.A., Hunt B.P.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated how well DNA metabarcoding of environmental samples captures changes in marine mesozooplankton community composition to optimize the use of sequencing data for studying seasonal dynamics. Although DNA metabarcoding is increasingly used to monitor the distribution of marine communities, there is a lack of standardized methods, and it remains uncertain to what extent the DNA data reflects patterns of community dynamics observed by other methods. Zooplankton net samples were collected every second week throughout 2017 in the northern Salish Sea, British Columbia. We compared metabarcoding of two genetic markers (18S targeting eukaryotes and cytochrome oxidase I targeting invertebrates) with microscopic assessments of the zooplankton collected. We also evaluated how data transformation using relative abundance, presence/absence, and the eDNA-index, affects the linearity between the morphological and genetic methods. Despite low taxonomic agreement between DNA metabarcoding and microscopy, we found most biomass dominating genera to be well represented. Using the eDNA-index, we found a generally good congruence between the seasonal cycles observed with microscopy and DNA, and that discrete water samples analyzed with DNA metabarcoding can provide information on the vertical distributions of mesozooplankton genera. We conclude by presenting guidelines for future studies that aim to use DNA to study marine zooplankton community dynamics.
Q1

Reconstructing a century of marine landings and fishing effort in Malaysia and Singapore
Ng C.Z., Jensen O.P., Ong J.J.
Abstract
Marine capture fisheries are crucial for many coastal communities in Malaysia and Singapore. However, knowledge of the historical state of the marine fishing resources, particularly during the British colonial period, remains limited. We compiled annual species landing data and fishing metrics from colonial and contemporary fishery reports spanning 114 years, from 1907 to 2021. Our results revealed a steady increase in species landings over 90 years, peaking in 2016 before declining in recent years. Through three case studies, we highlight high colonial landings of fusiliers (Caesionidae) from Singapore, reflecting extensive fishing operations across Southeast Asia. Bayesian Change Point analyses also identified increases in lobster landings along the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia in the mid-1980s, with fishing operations expanding from Johor northward through Pahang and Terengganu. Granger-causality tests revealed significant associations between Indian mackerel landings and the number of powered fishing boats in Perlis and Kedah in western Peninsular Malaysia, with varying lag intervals among each state. While these results enhance our understanding of fisheries trends, spatial expansion of fisheries and technological changes complicate the interpretation of fishery trends. Our results suggest that the plateau in global fishery landings since the 1980s may also have already occurred in Southeast Asia.
Q1

Working with Northeastern United States lobster harvesters to develop acoustic trap retrieval in place of buoys and persistent vertical lines to reduce whale entanglements
Matzen E.A., Fuller E.A., Asmutis-Silvia R., Milliken H., Amico M.L., Galvez B.A., Sharp W.B., Baumgartner M.F., Moore M.J.
Abstract
Vertical buoy lines (VBLs) between surface markers and bottom fishing gear frequently entangle large whales. These lethal and sublethal entanglements inhibit North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) recovery. Consequently, the use of persistent VBLs in situations of high entanglement risk off the east coasts of the USA and Canada is periodically prohibited. On demand, acoustic recovery systems make it possible to remove persistent VBLs, reducing entanglement risk, and potentially allowing fisheries to operate in such areas. To address concerns about performance, reliability, and safety, we evaluated numerous on-demand systems under normal fishing conditions. In 2020, conservationists, scientists, engineers, and lobster harvesters designed an experiment to trial on-demand systems in the New England offshore fisheries, using an open and honest dialogue while maintaining the confidentiality of data such as fishing locations. Between 2020 and 2023, 38 captains and their crews completed 5798 hauls using 431 on-demand units representing 10 different prototypes from multiple manufacturers. The geographic area expanded from limited offshore areas in 2020 to inshore, nearshore, and offshore waters in four different lobster management areas in 2022 and 2023. Trawl lengths ranged from 1 to 100 traps per trawl. Recovery success increased from 64% to 90% of hauls through the trials, although challenges remain, especially when fishing in deep waters or high current and tide locales. A parallel study is underway in Canada. The ability to ensure sustainable fisheries while significantly reducing entanglement risk is becoming a reality, with snow crabs and lobsters being sold in Canada and lobsters and Jonah crabs in the USA that were caught using experimental fishing permits and on-demand systems primarily in areas where persistent VBLs are seasonally prohibited for whale conservation.
Q1

Krill swarm biomass, energetic density, and species composition drive humpback whale distribution in the Northern California Current
Kaplan R.L., Bernard K.S., Derville S., Fisher J.L., Phillips E.M., Daly E.A., Warren J.D., Torres L.G.
Abstract
Prey abundance and quality are dynamic in time and space, impacting predator ecology. We examine variation in species-specific krill quantity and quality as prey for humpback whales in the Northern California Current region, using generalized additive models to assess metrics including biomass and energy density derived from an integrated dataset of concurrent active acoustics, net tows, and marine mammal observations (2018–2022). Overall, prey metrics were positively correlated with humpback whale presence, with increasing trends modified by seasonal (early versus late foraging season) and spatial (continental shelf versus offshore) variation (model deviance explained 36.3%–40.8%). Biomass and energy density had strong positive effects on humpback whale presence, suggesting whales target high-quality swarms that offer more energy per lunge. Elevated Thysanoessa spinifera abundance near humpback whales suggests that they target this species, particularly in the late season when they are energetically richer than Euphausia pacifica, the region’s other abundant krill species. Environmental change may decrease krill abundance and quality, impacting humpback whales’ ability to meet energetic requirements and potentially driving changes in their distributions and exposure to anthropogenic threats. Clarifying drivers of humpback whale krill patch selection can improve species distribution models and aid managers in mitigating risk to whales.
Q1

In situ zooplankton density estimates at a foraging site in the Canadian Arctic are below minimum prey thresholds for adult bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus)
McLennan H., Fortune S., den Haan M., Bazinet A., Cox M.J., Proud R., Mackie C., Kilabuk R., Brierley A.S.
Abstract
Bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) are an iconic Arctic species with a critical ecological role as a top predator. Bowheads can reach up to 80 tonnes and 20 m, yet feed on zooplankton four orders of magnitude smaller. Arctic zooplankton community composition and distribution are changing, which may have direct impacts on bowhead foraging. Data on the threshold prey density for successful bowhead feeding are needed to predict these impacts. However, zooplankton densities are patchy temporally and spatially, influenced by oceanographic conditions that alter the location of energetically profitable patches. We assessed spatio-temporal patterns in zooplankton abundance and distribution using a multi-frequency echosounder following a systematic and opportunistic survey near feeding whales in Iqalujjuaq Fjord, Cumberland Sound, Nunavut (65.66°N, 65.20°W) during August 2023. Zooplankton net samples were used to validate the acoustic data. There was a strong link between copepod distribution and environmental variables (e.g. water depth and tidal cycle) (generalized additive models, P < .001). Copepods were present in 49.8% of the fjord, with a median density of 3240 copepods m−3 and 0.26 g C m−3. Based on published prey density requirements, this site provides feeding opportunities for juveniles but is insufficient for the needs of adults (>0.44 g C m−3).
Q1

Making ocean climate effects studies matter to society
Huse G., Batten S., Schmidt J., Isensee K., Bahri T., Skern-Mauritzen M., Chiba S., Haugan P.
Abstract
The 5th International Conference on the Effects of Climate Change on the World’s Ocean (ECCWO5) was held from April 17 to 21, 2023, in Bergen, Norway. Some seven hundred ocean experts from around the world gathered online and under the sunny blue sky at Bryggen, a historic waterfront harbor. The ECCWO conference series was initiated in 2008, aiming to better understand the impacts of climate change on ocean ecosystems, the services they provide, and the people, businesses, and communities that depend on them. PICES, ICES, IOC, and FAO were major sponsors and organizers of this event with the Institute of Marine Research, Norway, as the local host. The outcomes of the symposium highlighted the importance of tipping points and the fact that the effects of climate change on habitat-building species are dramatic and are impacted by marine heat waves. A robust and adaptive ecosystem approach to fisheries management under climate change is recommended, and low-emission fishing should be implemented broadly. The effects of climate change on ocean deoxygenation need more research. Climate impact assessments should be routinely performed for key ecosystem components. There needs to be more focus on social-ecological approaches and effective stakeholder engagement. We encourage work across the boundaries of disciplines and geography to ensure rapid development and uptake of good practices in science-based advice and management so that they can be adopted by the fishing and aquaculture industry. The ECCWO conference series has contributed to building and maintaining a research community centered on climate change effects on the ocean that will be important moving forward.
Top-100
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
Comptes Rendus - Biologies
137 citations, 1.68%
|
|
PLoS ONE
93 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
70 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Comptes Rendus de l Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie
55 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
49 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
47 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
39 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Scientific Reports
37 citations, 0.45%
|
|
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
37 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Theoretical Biology
35 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Molecular Ecology
34 citations, 0.42%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
32 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
29 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Ecological Modelling
28 citations, 0.34%
|
|
New Phytologist
27 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
27 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Human Evolution
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Malaria Journal
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Tropical Medicine and International Health
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Radiation Research
25 citations, 0.31%
|
|
PeerJ
23 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
23 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
23 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Marine Biology
22 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Marine Science
20 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Anatomy
20 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Plant Journal
20 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Hydrobiologia
19 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Comptes Rendus - Palevol
19 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
19 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Marine Pollution Bulletin
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Animal Behaviour
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Vaccine
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Freshwater Biology
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Anatomical Record
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
17 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Developmental Biology
17 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Gene Medicine
17 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Gene
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Biophysical Journal
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Acta Tropica
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Plant Physiology
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Trees - Structure and Function
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Trends in Parasitology
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Marine Ecology - Progress Series
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Developmental Dynamics
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Plant Science
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Zoologica Scripta
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Historical Biology
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Neuroscience
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
The Lancet
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
General and Comparative Endocrinology
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Biogeography
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Plant and Soil
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Italian Journal of Zoology
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Annals of Botany
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Biology of Reproduction
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Theoretical And Applied Genetics
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Gene Therapy
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Archaeological Science
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Human Gene Therapy
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Biogeosciences
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Neuroscience Letters
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Sea Research
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Development (Cambridge)
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Molecular Biology and Evolution
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Plant Cell
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Science
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Biology
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Journal of Neuroscience
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Biological Invasions
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Thermal Biology
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Phycology
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Evolutionary Biology
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Plants
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Behavioural Brain Research
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Comptes Rendus - Geoscience
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Plant Biology
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Oncogene
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Zoology
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Acta Botanica Gallica
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Molecular Therapy
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Evolutionary Anthropology
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Ecology
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Elsevier
2333 citations, 28.55%
|
|
Wiley
1189 citations, 14.55%
|
|
Springer Nature
1176 citations, 14.39%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
351 citations, 4.3%
|
|
Oxford University Press
255 citations, 3.12%
|
|
MDPI
206 citations, 2.52%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
134 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
114 citations, 1.4%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
76 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
67 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
64 citations, 0.78%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
63 citations, 0.77%
|
|
The Royal Society
60 citations, 0.73%
|
|
SAGE
56 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
54 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
54 citations, 0.66%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
48 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
48 citations, 0.59%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
43 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
37 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
34 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Annual Reviews
34 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
33 citations, 0.4%
|
|
American Physiological Society
32 citations, 0.39%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
32 citations, 0.39%
|
|
EDP Sciences
30 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Radiation Research Society
25 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
25 citations, 0.31%
|
|
PeerJ
23 citations, 0.28%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
22 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IOP Publishing
22 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
AIP Publishing
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Biophysical Society
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
World Scientific
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Copernicus
15 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Society for the Study of Reproduction
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Brill
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Microbiology Society
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
CAIRN
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
SciELO
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Magnolia Press
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Crop Science Society of America
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Dose-Response Society
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
S. Karger AG
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IntechOpen
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Museum of Natural History (BioOne sponsored)
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Portland Press
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
BMJ
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Scientific Societies
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Anthropological Society of Nippon
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
MIT Press
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Editions E D K
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Zoological Society of Japan
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Carnegie Museum of Natural History
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Bryological & Lichenological Society
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Parasitologists
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Emerald
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
King Saud University
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Genetica
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Impact Journals
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
French Institute of Health and Medical Research
69 publications, 10.57%
|
|
Institut Pasteur
24 publications, 3.68%
|
|
Sorbonne University
22 publications, 3.37%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
22 publications, 3.37%
|
|
University of Montpellier
18 publications, 2.76%
|
|
École pratique des hautes études
14 publications, 2.14%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
9 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Collège de France
8 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Institut Gustave Roussy
7 publications, 1.07%
|
|
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
6 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
5 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
5 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
5 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Institut Curie
5 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
5 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Necker–Enfants Malades Hospital
5 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
4 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Columbia University
4 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Université Côte d'Azur
4 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Université de Lille
4 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
3 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Paris Cité University
3 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Liège
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Nantes
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Manchester
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Virginia Tech
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Washington
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Arizona
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Chicago
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Pasteur Institute of Lille
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Universidad de Alcalá
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Barcelona
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Université Clermont Auvergne
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Cadi Ayyad University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Brandeis University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National Scientific Center of Marine Biology of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Limnological Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Geological Institute of of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Weizmann Institute of Science
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Malaya
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Geneva
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Imperial College London
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
International Atomic Energy Agency
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Drexel University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Air Force Medical University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Siena
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Princeton University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Washington State University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Sopron
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Children's Hospital Agia Sophia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Mons
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
University of Buenos Aires
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Japan Science and Technology Agency
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Rockefeller University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Indonesian Institute of Sciences
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Dartmouth College
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Ulm University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Hokkaido University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Avignon University
1 publication, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
France
|
France, 550, 84.23%
France
550 publications, 84.23%
|
USA
|
USA, 48, 7.35%
USA
48 publications, 7.35%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 20, 3.06%
Belgium
20 publications, 3.06%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 17, 2.6%
United Kingdom
17 publications, 2.6%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 13, 1.99%
Germany
13 publications, 1.99%
|
China
|
China, 7, 1.07%
China
7 publications, 1.07%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 1.07%
Spain
7 publications, 1.07%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 7, 1.07%
Morocco
7 publications, 1.07%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 0.77%
Italy
5 publications, 0.77%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 5, 0.77%
Switzerland
5 publications, 0.77%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.61%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.61%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 4, 0.61%
New Caledonia
4 publications, 0.61%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.61%
Poland
4 publications, 0.61%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.46%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.46%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 0.46%
Thailand
3 publications, 0.46%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 0.46%
Tunisia
3 publications, 0.46%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 0.46%
Japan
3 publications, 0.46%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.31%
Russia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 0.31%
Australia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.31%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.31%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.31%
Israel
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 2, 0.31%
Canada
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.31%
Romania
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.15%
Austria
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.15%
Benin
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.15%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.15%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.15%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.15%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.15%
Greece
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.15%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.15%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.15%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 1, 0.15%
Madagascar
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.15%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.15%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 1, 0.15%
Myanmar
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.15%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.15%
Norway
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 1, 0.15%
Senegal
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.15%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.15%
Finland
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.15%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.15%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.15%
|
Show all (15 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
1 profile journal article
Lucas Patrick

University of Bordeaux
55 publications,
2 443 citations
h-index: 28
1 profile journal article
RUBERA Isabelle
66 publications,
2 150 citations
h-index: 28
1 profile journal article
Marion-Poll Frédéric
PhD in Biological/biomedical sciences, Professor

AgroParisTech
88 publications,
2 885 citations
h-index: 28
1 profile journal article
Mark J.
146 publications,
7 679 citations
h-index: 49