Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Impact factor
1.1
journal names
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences
J INFORM OPTIM SCI
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography
(652 citations)

Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences
(525 citations)

Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics
(397 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
(60 publications)

Siksha 'O' Anusandhan
(25 publications)

Chaoyang University of Technology
(23 publications)

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
(34 publications)

Siksha 'O' Anusandhan
(24 publications)

Iran University of Science and Technology
(16 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 83

Enhancing Secure Messaging in Electronic Health Records: Evaluating the Impact of Emoji Chat Reactions on the Volume of Interruptive Notifications
Will J., Small W., Iturrate E., Testa P., Feldman J.
Abstract
Background Electronic health record secure messaging (EHRSM) is an increasingly utilized tool for communication among clinicians. However, there is concern about the growing quantity of disruptions it presents via interruptive notification.
Objectives The primary aim of this study is to assess whether introducing emoji reactions, which do not trigger push notifications in EHRSM, can alleviate the burden of interruptive notifications. The second aim is to use messaging notification metadata to identify subgroups that might benefit from targeted interventions to aid the adoption of this innovation.
Methods We implemented the emoji reaction feature into EHRSM across a large academic health system. We evaluated the volume of push notifications 11 weeks before (pre-emoji period) and after (post-emoji period) introducing emoji reactions in EHRSM. Notification metadata was categorized by user type, and users were stratified based on notification volume.
Results There were 1,387,506 fewer push notifications in the post-emoji period (a decrease of 4.7%). Subgroups of users with increasing mean daily push notifications in the pre-emoji period were associated with decreasing mean daily push notifications in the post-emoji period. Among the eight user subgroups, six experienced a significant reduction in interruptive notifications, with the pharmacy and “other” subgroups not observing a reduction. Users in the top quartile of notification volume saw the greatest reduction in burden across each user subgroup.
Conclusion Integrating emoji reactions into EHRSM across a large academic health system significantly reduced the burden of push notifications among EHRSM users. Utilizing messaging notification metadata allowed us to identify subgroups that require additional intervention.

Using Electronic Health Record Mortality Data to Promote Goals-of-Care Discussions in Seriously Ill Transferred Patients: A Pilot Study
Mahendraker N., Gutierrez-Asis E., Park S., Williams L.S., Schleyer T., Umberfield E.E.
Abstract
Background Mortality prediction data may aid in identifying seriously ill transferred patients at high risk of dying and facilitate early goals-of-care discussions (GOCD); however, this is rarely evaluated. We recently developed a model for predicting 30-day inpatient mortality, which may be useful for promoting early GOCD.
Objectives Our objectives were to examine the effects of sharing model-generated mortality risk with hospitalists by assessing (1) if hospitalists agreed with the mortality risk prediction, (2) if they planned to conduct GOCD or consult palliative care within 72 hours of transfer, and (3) if the communication alert affected GOCD timing and other clinical outcomes. We also aimed to measure the association between both the model-generated and hospitalists' stratified risk assessments with patient mortality.
Methods This was a nonrandomized quasi-experimental pilot study with a historical control group. On the second day of hospitalization, the model-generated risk was communicated to the hospitalists. Hospitalists were asked to answer questions via a HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)-compliant mobile communication system, and clinical outcomes were extracted via chart review.
Results Eighty-four patients (42 in the control and 42 in the intervention group) were included in this study. Hospitalists agreed that all patients in the intervention group were at risk for inpatient mortality. Hospitalists were more likely to indicate a plan to conduct GOCD in the intervention group (n = 9) compared with the control group (n = 4, p < 0.001). In this subset of patients, GOCD was completed within 72 hours in 78% of intervention patients (n = 7) as compared with 50% in the control group (n = 2). The greater absolute value of the model-generated mortality risk was significantly associated with deaths (p = 0.01), similar to the hospitalists' prediction of the mortality risk (p = 0.02).
Conclusion Communicating model-generated mortality risk to hospitalists is a promising approach to promote timely GOCD.

Dealing with Diversity in Digital Psychological Interventions for Young People: A Structured Review
Jahedi F., Henman P.W., Ryan J.C.
AbstractIn recent years, despite significant progress in digital psychological interventions (DPIs), the prevalence of psychological issues among young adults remains a concern. While research on the feasibility and effectiveness of DPIs is extensive, there's a growing recognition of the need for a sociotechnical approach to enhance user engagement. This review aims to highlight the importance of integrating diversity, especially sociodemographic characteristics, into DPI design and implementation.The review meticulously examined literature from six academic databases focused on DPIs tailored for users aged 12 to 26, spanning the period between 2009 and 2019. The data extraction process specifically targeted biosocial factors such as gender and ethnicity, as well as sociocultural elements like remoteness and labor force status among users. Among the initial pool of 879 articles, a refined selection of 25 underwent detailed analysis. Intriguingly, 14 of these studies did not treat sociodemographic factors as independent variables, leaving only 11 that did. Notably, gender and ethnicity emerged as the most frequently studied factors, with remoteness and labor force considerations receiving comparatively less attention.Despite the acknowledged importance of user engagement in DPI effectiveness, the review highlights a critical gap: insufficient consideration of young adults' sociodemographic characteristics in intervention design and implementation. Therefore, the findings strongly support further mixed-method studies to fully understand the complex social factors influencing user engagement with DPIs. Closing this gap will undoubtedly refine and optimize DPIs to better meet the diverse needs of young adults dealing with psychological challenges.

Factors Influencing Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of Frequent Drug–Drug Interaction Alerts
Biady Y., Lee T., Pham L., Patanwala A., Poon S., Ritchie A., Burke R., Penm J.
Abstract
Background Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) remain a highly prevalent issue for patients in both community and hospital settings. Electronic medication management systems have implemented DDI alerts to mitigate DDI-related harm from occurring.
Objectives The primary aim of this study was to explore factors that influence health care professionals' (hospital doctors, hospital pharmacists, general practitioners, and community pharmacists) perceptions and action taken by them in response to DDI alerts.
Methods A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews between early January and late February 2021. The top 20 most frequently triggered DDI alerts previously identified were used as examples of alert prompts shown to participants.
Results A total of 20 participants were recruited. General practitioners (n = 4) were most likely to consider DDI alerts to be clinically relevant and important, and hospital doctors (n = 4) were most likely to consider these alerts not being clinically relevant nor important. Three main factors were identified to influence health care professionals' perceptions of DDI alerts, which included clinical relevance, visual presentation, and content of alerts.
Conclusion Health care professionals' perceptions of DDI alerts are influenced by multiple factors and considerations are required to create tailored alerts for users and their clinical contexts. Improvement in DDI alerts should be a priority to improve patient medication safety and health outcomes.

Into the Unknown: The Shift in Key Service Performance Indicators after a Clinical Hospital Department Incorporates Virtual Service Delivery Options
Vivanti A., Murray E., Doola R., Hill J., Sullivan C.
Abstract
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) forced health care services to introduce virtual service delivery. Little is known about the impact on health care service delivery.
Objectives This case study reports the impact of introducing remote access facilitating virtual service delivery.
Methods Key performance indicators of health care service delivery (Nutrition and Dietetic Department, 26.9 full-time equivalents) were monitored over three 6-month periods. These periods were Phase 1 (pre-COVID restrictions), Phase 2 (zero tolerance to COVID), and Phase 3 (living with COVID). Virtual service delivery was initiated between Phases 1 and 2. Virtual service delivery days were defined as days worked virtually in lieu of leave.
Results During Phase 2 and Phase 3, there were 87 and 188 extra days of virtual service delivery achieved and an opportunity cost saving of $26,000 USD and $56,000 USD, respectively. Leave hours reduced between Phases 1 and 2 (p < 0.006; mean ± standard deviation [SD] 591 ± 213 and 222 ± 91) and maintained between Phases 1 and 3 (p < 0.342; mean ± SD 494 ± 98) despite the pandemic. No adverse clinical events were reported. Professional quality of life scores were maintained.
Conclusion Virtual service delivery through remote access provided many days of otherwise potentially lost productivity, maintained patient care with no adverse events, and sustained Professional Quality of Life despite pandemic challenges. Operationally, lessons learnt included the importance of positive team culture to working effectively, keeping teams connected and adapting different solutions to meet teams' requirements. Incorporating virtual service delivery options into a hospital clinical department showed performance stability across key service performance indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic.

User-centered Design and Formative Evaluation of a Web Application to Collect and Visualize Real-time Clinician Well-being Levels
Shu D., Xu C.T., Pandey S., Walls V., Tenney K., Georgilis A., Melink L., Wu D.T., Molano J.R.
Abstract
Background Clinician burnout is increasingly prevalent in the health care workplace. Hospital leadership needs an informatics tool to measure clinicians' well-being levels and provide empirical evidence to improve their work environment.
Objectives This study aimed to (1) design and implement a web-based application to collect and visualize clinicians' well-being levels and (2) conduct formative usability evaluation.
Methods Clinician and staff well-being champions guided the development of the Well-being Check application. User-centered design and Agile principles were used for incremental development of the app. The app included a customizable survey and an interactive visualization. The survey consisted of six standard, two optional, and three additional questions. The interactive visualization included various charts and word clouds with filters for drill-down analysis. The evaluation was done primarily with the rehabilitation (REHAB) team using data-centered approaches through historical survey data and qualitative coding of the free-text explanations and user-centered approaches through the System Usability Scale (SUS).
Results The evaluation showed that the app appropriately accommodated historical survey data from the REHAB team, enabling the comparison between self-assessed and perceived team well-being levels, and summarized key drivers based on the qualitative coding of the free-text explanations. Responses from the 23 REHAB team members showed an above-average score (SUS: 80.22), indicating high usability of the app.
Conclusion The Well-being Check app was developed in a user-centered manner and evaluated to demonstrate its effectiveness and usability. Future work includes iterative refinement of the app and designing a pre-poststudy using the app to measure the change in clinicians' well-being levels for quality improvement intervention.

Surgeon-Perceived Requirements for a Platform to Integrate Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Practice
Leonard L.D., Driscoll B., Vemuru S., Kovar A., Billings J., Kim S., Lin C., Tevis S., Cumbler E.
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized, validated tools that translate subjective patient-reported concerns about their health status into quantitative data. PROMs were initially developed as research instruments; however, they have more recently been recognized as important clinical tools. PROMs have not been widely adopted into surgical practices and this study sought to uncover the system requirements of a platform to integrate PROMs into surgical practice, as perceived by surgeons.
Methods Semi-structured interviews were performed from November 2019 until August of 2020. Interviews continued until thematic saturation was achieved. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative interview data were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach.
Results Analysis revealed 12 system features desired by surgeons for a platform to integrate PROMs into clinical use. These were further grouped into four unique overarching themes. Surgeons asserted that the platform must (1) be user-friendly, (2) promote information transparency, (3) incorporate validated questionnaires while still allowing for some degree of customizability, and (4) support the collection and display of longitudinal data.
Conclusions Health care systems planning to develop a platform to integrate PROMs into their clinical practices should investigate the feasibility of the system features identified as essential by this study. While surgeons represent an important stakeholder group when designing a new platform for use in surgical practice, it will also be crucial to explore the features desired by patients before designing or adopting a platform for clinical use.

Refining Clinician Workflow as a Means to Improving Catheter Quality Measures
Clarke M.A., Wardian J.L., Fleharty B.S., Reha C.G., Birge J.R.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to improve the quality measure performance for indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) duration, central venous catheter (CVC) duration, and telemetry duration by redesigning clinical decision support (CDS) tools within the documentation process and order workflow.
Methods The effectiveness of the redesign was evaluated using system standard quality reporting methodology to observe device duration, central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rate preintervention (FY2017) and postintervention (FY2018). Electronic health record (EHR) reporting tools were used to evaluate CDS alert data both preintervention and postintervention.
Results Total device duration and line days per patient days were reduced for CVC (12.8% [0.305–0.266]) and IUC (4.68% [0.171–0.163]). Mean telemetry duration was reduced by 16.94% (3.72–3.09 days), and CDS alert volume decreased 18.6% from a preintervention mean of 1.18 alerts per patient per day (81,190 total alerts) to a postintervention mean of 0.96 alerts per patient per day (61,899 total alerts). Both CLABSI (2.8% [1.07–1.04]) and CAUTI (8.1% [1.61–1.48]) rates were reduced, resulting in approximately $926,000 in savings.
Conclusion In this novel model, the redesigned CDS tools improved clinician response to CDS alerts, prompting providers to take action on relevant orders that automatically updated the clinical documentation to reflect their actions. The study demonstrated that effective redesign of CDS tools within the documentation process and order workflow can reduce device duration, improve patient outcomes, and decrease CDS alert volume.

Will the Doctor “See” You Now? The Development and Implementation of a Targeted Telemedicine System for Primary Care
Epstein J.A., Lkhagvajav Z., Young T., Bertram A., Yeh H., Taylor C.O.
Abstract
Objectives The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a rapid adoption of telehealth. For underserved populations lacking internet access, telemedicine was accomplished by phone rather than an audio–video connection. The latter is presumed a more effective form and better approximation of an in-person visit. We sought to provide a telehealth platform to overcome barriers for underserved groups to hold video visits with their health care providers and evaluate differences between the two telehealth modalities as assessed by physicians and patients.
Methods We designed a simplified tablet solution for video visits and piloted its use among patients who otherwise would have been completing audio-only visits. Patients consented to participation and were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to continue with their scheduled phone visit (control) versus being shipped a tablet to facilitate a video visit (intervention). Participants and providers completed communication and satisfaction surveys.
Results Tablet and connectivity design features included removal of all functions but for the telemedicine program, LTE always-on wireless internet connectivity, absence of external equipment (cords chargers and keyboard), and no registration with a digital portal. In total, 18 patients were enrolled. Intervention patients with video-enabled devices compared to control patients agreed more strongly that they were satisfied with their visits (4.75/5 vs. 3.75/5, p = 0.02).
Conclusion The delivered simplified tablet solution for video visits holds promise to improve access to video visits for underserved groups. Strategies to facilitate patient acceptance of devices are needed to expand the scope and potential impact of this effort.

Directly Integrating Health Information Exchange (HIE) Data with the Electronic Health Record Increases HIE Use by Emergency Department Clinicians
Rivera R.L., Hosler H., Jang J.H., Schaffer J.T., Price J., Vest J.R., Schleyer T.K.
Abstract
Objectives This article (1) develops a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources app, Health Dart, that integrates information from Indiana's community health information exchange (HIE), the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), directly with Cerner, an electronic health record (EHR), and (2) evaluates the effect of Health Dart's implementation on HIE use.
Methods Health Dart was implemented in 14 Indiana University Health emergency departments (EDs) using a stepped-wedge study design. We analyzed rates of INPC use in 286,175 ED encounters between October 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. Logistic regression was used to model the probability of INPC use given the implementation context, such as user interface (UI) enhancements and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Results INPC use increased by 131% across all encounters (from 3.6 to 8.3%; p < 0.001) after Health Dart implementation. INPC use increased by 144% (from 3.6 to 8.8%; p < 0.001) more than 2 months postimplementation. After UI enhancements, postimplementation INPC use increased by 123% (from 3.5 to 7.8%) compared to 181% (from 3.6 to 10.1%; p < 0.001) in postimplementation encounters that occurred before UI enhancements. During the pandemic, postimplementation INPC use increased by 135% (from 3.4 to 8.0%; p < 0.001) compared to 178% (from 3.6 to 10%; p < 0.001) in postimplementation encounters that occurred before the pandemic. Statistical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05).
Conclusion Direct integration of HIE information into an EHR substantially increased frequency of HIE use, but the effect was weakened by the UI enhancements and pandemic. HIE information integrated into EHRs in the form of problem-oriented dashboards can potentially make information retrieval more efficient and effective for clinicians.

Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Experience with a Technologically Enabled Pillbox: A Qualitative Study
Shannon E.M., Mueller S.K., Schnipper J.L.
Abstract
Objectives As part of a study to assess whether a technologically enabled pillbox prescribed to patients at hospital discharge can improve medication safety, we sought to assess participant experiences with the intervention.
Methods We conducted a series of semi-structured phone interviews with patients, patient caregivers, and inpatient and outpatient clinicians who participated in the Smart Pillbox Transition Study. We developed an interview guide using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework, which included the a priori domains of (1) barriers to implementation, (2) facilitators of the intervention, and (3) general feedback regarding experience with the intervention. Within these domains, we employed SEIPS-informed themes of environment and organization, logistics and tasks, personnel and patients, and technology and tools. Interviews were conducted between May 2018 and January 2019. We used content analysis to interpret findings.
Results We interviewed 6 patients, 2 caregivers, and 5 inpatient and 2 outpatient clinicians. Patient-endorsed barriers in the theme of technology and tools included signal issues, inappropriate alarms, and portability. Barriers in the theme of logistics and tasks included coordination with pharmacists in the event of a prescription change. Barriers mentioned by clinicians included patients who were poor fits for the intervention (theme: personnel and patients) and competing demands at discharge (theme: logistics and tasks). Facilitators that were frequently mentioned by patients and caregivers in the theme of technology and tools included useful alarms and ease of use. Clinicians stated that communication with pharmacy and study staff helped facilitate the intervention (theme: personnel and patients).
Conclusion We identified several key barriers and facilitators from patients, caregivers, and clinicians to successful implementation of this intervention. Reconciling these sometimes contrasting viewpoints will be crucial if the Smart Pillbox or similar health information technology interventions are to be adopted as tools to improve medication safety during care transitions.

Implementation of Eye-Tracking Technology to Monitor Clinician Fatigue in Routine Clinical Care: A Feasibility Study
Kadhim B., Khairat S., Li F., Gross I.T., Nath B., Hauser R.G., Melnick E.R.
Abstract
Background Physician fatigue increases the likelihood of medical errors. Eye-tracking technology offers an unobtrusive and objective way to measure fatigue but has only been implemented in controlled settings.
Objective Our objective was to determine the feasibility of capturing physiological indicators of fatigue using eye-tracking technology in a real-world clinical setting.
Methods A mixed-methods feasibility study was performed in a convenience sample of clinicians practicing in an urban, academic emergency department from November 11 to December 15, 2021. Outcomes included fatigue assessed at the beginning and end of each shift via eye-tracking (with low scores indicating greater fatigue) and self-report.
Results Among 15 participants, self-reported fatigue and task load increased from the beginning to the end of their shift (fatigue visual analog scale [FVAS] 3.7–4.6, p = 0.04; physician task load [PTL] 97.7–154.3, p = 0.01). It was feasible to collect eye-tracking data at a fixed computer workstation with twice daily calibration and 61% capture of reliable data when the clinician was working at the study computer. Eye-tracking metrics did not change significantly from the beginning to the end of the shift. Eye metric fatigue score was associated with the change in PTL score (r 0.59, p = 0.02) but not FVAS. This association persisted after adjusting for age, gender, and role, with every 10-point increase in PTL, there was a 0.02-point increase in fatigue score (p = 0.04).
Conclusion It is unclear whether the inability to detect fatigue via eye-tracking in routine clinical care was due to confounding factors, the technology, study design, sample size, or an absence of physiological fatigue. Further research and advances in functionality are needed to determine the eye-tracking technology's role in measuring clinician fatigue in routine care.

Relationship between Diabetes Self-Management and the Use of Health Care Apps: A Cross-Sectional Study
Inagaki S., Kato K., Abe K., Takahashi H., Matsuda T.
Abstract
Background People with diabetes are increasingly using smartphone health care applications (apps) to manage their health. However, few studies have examined the percentage of people with diabetes using health care apps and their relationship to self-care.
Objective The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of health care apps among people with diabetes and the relationship between app use and self-management.
Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey among people with type 2 diabetes. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted using the scores of the Japanese version of Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities and exercise and general diet subscales as the objective variables.
Results Of 253 participants included in this study, 61 (24.1%) used health care apps. Approximately 20% of those aged ≥ 60 also used health care apps. Use of health care apps was a significant predictor of physical activity frequency along with autonomous motivation (p < 0.001). Participants who used health care apps showed a 0.91 point higher physical activity score than those who did not. Regarding the general diet score, the use of health care apps was not significantly associated with dietary habits (p = 0.29).
Conclusion Among people with type 2 diabetes, 24.1% used health care apps, and self-management scores of exercise were significantly higher in people with diabetes who used health care apps than in those who did not.

Can Utilizing Business Intelligence with Electronic Dental Record Data Improve Business Decisions for Dental Organizations: A Scoping Review
Walters J.S., Higgins D., Irving M.J., Wallace J.P.
Abstract
Background Business intelligence can give businesses the ability to understand their strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement and can help reduce uncertainty in the decision-making process. With the increasing use of electronic dental records creating more and more dental data each day, it is an opportune time to determine if the data can be coupled with business intelligence systems to improve the management decision-making process in dental organizations to result in service improvement.
Methods A scoping review was performed to map the research on the use of business intelligence in dental organizations and to identify any gaps in the existing literature. This scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Scr) framework. The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase, Emcare, Cinahl, Informit, Web of Science, and Scopus. Data extracted from the articles included the organization type, purpose/aims, the software utilized, data sources utilized, outcomes measured, decision-makers involved, service benefit type, and service improvements.
Results In all, 945 articles were found during the search strategy, with 25 articles selected for full-text review. Of these 25 articles, only 3 met the final inclusion in this review. All three included articles were centered around dental school organizations and all situated in the United States. All three articles demonstrated a benefit from management decision-makers utilizing business intelligence systems for improving service efficiency.
Conclusion There is limited evidence to show that managers utilizing business intelligence systems in dental school organizations can lead to improvements in the organization's services. There was no evidence to support the use of a business intelligence system in other types of dental organizations. More research is required in this area.

Pediatric Practices' Perceptions of Text Message Communication with Families: An American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) Study
Nekrasova E., Fiks A.G., Wynn C., Torres A., Griffith M., Shone L.P., Localio R., Shults J., Unger R., Ware L.A., Stockwell M.S.
Abstract
Background Text messages can be an effective and low-cost mechanism for patient reminders; however, they are yet to be consistently integrated into pediatric primary care.
Objective The aim of this study was to explore pediatric primary care clinician and staff perceptions of pediatric office text message communication with families.
Methods As part of the National Institutes of Health–funded Flu2Text randomized controlled trial of second-dose influenza vaccine text message reminders, we conducted 7 focus groups and 4 individual interviews in July–August 2019 with primary care pediatric clinicians and staff (n = 39). Overall, 10 Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) pediatric practices in 10 states were selected using stratified sampling. Semi-structured discussion guides included perspectives on possible uses, perceived usefulness, and ease of use of text messages; practices' current text messaging infrastructure; and perceived barriers/facilitators to future use of texting. Two investigators independently coded and analyzed transcripts based on the technology acceptance model using NVIVO 12 Plus (intercoder reliability, K = 0.86).
Results Overall, participants were supportive of text reminders for the second-dose influenza vaccine, other vaccines, and appointments and perceived texting as a preferred method of communication for caregivers. Health information privacy and patient confidentiality were the main concerns cited. Only respondents from practices with no internal appointment text message reminder system prior to the study expressed concerns about technology implementation logistics, time, and cost.
Conclusion Text message reminders, for various uses, appear to be well accepted among a group of geographically widespread pediatric practices after participation in a trial of influenza vaccine text message reminders. Privacy, confidentiality, and resource barriers need to be addressed to facilitate successful implementation.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography
652 citations, 11.14%
|
|
Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences
525 citations, 8.97%
|
|
Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics
397 citations, 6.78%
|
|
European Journal of Operational Research
104 citations, 1.78%
|
|
IEEE Access
91 citations, 1.55%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
57 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Computers and Industrial Engineering
47 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Optimization
46 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
45 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
44 citations, 0.75%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
43 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
38 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Mathematics
36 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems
33 citations, 0.56%
|
|
International Series in Operations Research and Management Science
33 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Journal of Statistics and Management Systems
32 citations, 0.55%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
31 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
29 citations, 0.5%
|
|
International Journal of Production Research
28 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
27 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
26 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications
26 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Annals of Operations Research
25 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Wireless Personal Communications
24 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Sustainability
23 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Heliyon
23 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
22 citations, 0.38%
|
|
OPSEARCH
20 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of the Operational Research Society
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
AIMS Mathematics
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Mathematics
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Global Optimization
16 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Journal of Production Economics
16 citations, 0.27%
|
|
PLoS ONE
16 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Applied Mathematics and Computation
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Energies
15 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Symmetry
14 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Computers and Mathematics with Applications
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Transactions in Operational Research
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation
12 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Complexity
12 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IETE Journal of Research
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
11 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computers, Materials and Continua
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Computer Mathematics
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computers and Operations Research
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Chemistry
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
MATEC Web of Conferences
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Benchmarking
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Mathematical Programming
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Sensors
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
AEJ - Alexandria Engineering Journal
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Information Sciences
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Applied Mathematics
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Scientific Reports
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Energy
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Mathematical and Computer Modelling
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Financial Engineering, E-commerce and Supply Chain
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Current Issues in Tourism
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Soft Computing
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Asian-European Journal of Mathematics
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Systems Science
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Outsourcing Management for Supply Chain Operations and Logistics Service
7 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Studies in Computational Intelligence
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Computer Systems Science and Engineering
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Expert Systems
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Algorithms
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Sensors
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Energy Reports
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2067 citations, 35.31%
|
|
Springer Nature
655 citations, 11.19%
|
|
Elsevier
646 citations, 11.04%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
464 citations, 7.93%
|
|
MDPI
195 citations, 3.33%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
164 citations, 2.8%
|
|
Emerald
133 citations, 2.27%
|
|
Wiley
121 citations, 2.07%
|
|
IGI Global
66 citations, 1.13%
|
|
AIP Publishing
48 citations, 0.82%
|
|
IOP Publishing
47 citations, 0.8%
|
|
IOS Press
39 citations, 0.67%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
38 citations, 0.65%
|
|
SAGE
36 citations, 0.61%
|
|
World Scientific
35 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
29 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
27 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
25 citations, 0.43%
|
|
EDP Sciences
21 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Tech Science Press
20 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
19 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
18 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
17 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Oxford University Press
13 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
10 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
9 citations, 0.15%
|
|
King Saud University
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Mathematical Society of the Republic of China
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
8 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Polskie Towarzystwo Statystyczne
6 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
5 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IWA Publishing
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Operations Research Society of Japan
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Lviv Polytechnic National University
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
4 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PeerJ
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Wayne State University Press
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
College of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Punjab
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Alexandria University
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
F1000 Research
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Hans Publishers
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science, eptcs
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Estatistica
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences (IJMEMS)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Jacodesmath Institute
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SciELO
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Academy Publishing (IAP)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IntechOpen
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AOSIS
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Statistical Society
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AMO Publisher
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Begell House
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Duke University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Quality
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
The Royal Society
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Fuzzy Information and Engineering Branch of The Operations Research Society of China
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Publishers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Wen Dao (Hong Kong) Culture Media Corporation Limited
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Mathematical Association of America
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Wilmington Scientific Publishers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
EPI SCP
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Instrument Society of America
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Electromagnetics Academy
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Society of Chemical Engineers, Japan
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Borsa Istanbul Anonim Sirketi
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Gazi University Journal of Science
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
60 publications, 2.55%
|
|
Siksha 'O' Anusandhan
25 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Chaoyang University of Technology
23 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology
20 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
18 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Chung Yuan Christian University
16 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Tamkang University
16 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Delhi
14 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Delhi Technological University
14 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Van Yüzüncü Yıl University
14 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Amity University, Noida
14 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Tatung University
14 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Yarmouk University
12 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Lahore
11 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Amity University, Jaipur
11 publications, 0.47%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Silchar
10 publications, 0.42%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
10 publications, 0.42%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
10 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Kansai University
10 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Netaji Subhas University of Technology
10 publications, 0.42%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
9 publications, 0.38%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
9 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Yazd University
9 publications, 0.38%
|
|
National Changhua University of Education
9 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Hiroshima City University
9 publications, 0.38%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra
8 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Shih Chien University
8 publications, 0.34%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
8 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Piraeus
8 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
7 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
7 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Gautam Buddha University
7 publications, 0.3%
|
|
National Dong Hwa University
7 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Feng Chia University
7 publications, 0.3%
|
|
National Chin-Yi University of Technology
7 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Manipal University Jaipur
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
National Pingtung University
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Asia University
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Manitoba
6 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Management and Technology
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Payame Noor University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Maharshi Dayanand University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Burdwan
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University Malaysia, Terengganu
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Chengdu University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
National Central University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Western Australia
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Yunnan Normal University
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Ghana
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Douala
5 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Riphah International University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Rourkela
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Graphic Era University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Kufa
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Gauhati University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Florida State University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
National Pingtung University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
National Yunlin University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Anhui University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
La Trobe University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Yeungnam University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Carleton University
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
South-West University "Neofit Rilski"
4 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Jamia Millia Islamia
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Aligarh Muslim University
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Durgapur
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Raipur
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Banasthali Vidyapith
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
University of Mosul
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Islamic Azad University of Rasht
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
North-Eastern Hill University
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
I. K. Gujral Punjab Technical University
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Mody University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
University of Pisa
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
University of L'Aquila
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Pusan National University
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
University of California, Davis
3 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
34 publications, 9.34%
|
|
Siksha 'O' Anusandhan
24 publications, 6.59%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
16 publications, 4.4%
|
|
Van Yüzüncü Yıl University
14 publications, 3.85%
|
|
University of Lahore
10 publications, 2.75%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
9 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology
8 publications, 2.2%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
6 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch
5 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Douala
5 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Kufa
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University Malaysia, Terengganu
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Anhui University
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Ghana
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Delhi
3 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Delhi Technological University
3 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology
3 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Graphic Era University
3 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Mosul
3 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Yazd University
3 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Islamic Azad University of Rasht
3 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Chengdu University
3 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Qassim University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Management and Technology
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Riphah International University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Jamia Millia Islamia
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Rourkela
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Silchar
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Semnan University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Lahore College for Women University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Tikrit University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
GLA University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Pamukkale University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Gautam Buddha University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Tatung University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
National Pingtung University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
National Pingtung University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Kyungpook National University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Yunnan Normal University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Manitoba
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Suez University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Jazan University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Al Jouf University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Northern Border University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
University of Tehran
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Çankaya University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Firat University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Golestan University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Shahid Beheshti University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
University of Okara
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Jawaharlal Nehru University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Chandigarh University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Bursa Uludağ University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Hamirpur
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Agartala
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Bharathidasan University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Karaj
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Qaemshahr Islamic Azad University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Shiraz University of Technology
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Bingol University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
University of Central Punjab
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Christ University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Suleyman Demirel University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Al-Mustansiriyah University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
University of Bonab
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
University of Duhok
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Salahaddin University-Erbil
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
University of Kerbala
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Sirmaur
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
University of Thi-Qar
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Maharshi Dayanand University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Statistical Institute
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Defence Research and Development Organisation
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Sirjan University of Technology
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University
1 publication, 0.27%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
India
|
India, 463, 19.66%
India
463 publications, 19.66%
|
China
|
China, 353, 14.99%
China
353 publications, 14.99%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 70, 2.97%
Iran
70 publications, 2.97%
|
USA
|
USA, 65, 2.76%
USA
65 publications, 2.76%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 36, 1.53%
Pakistan
36 publications, 1.53%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 31, 1.32%
Italy
31 publications, 1.32%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 30, 1.27%
Japan
30 publications, 1.27%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 26, 1.1%
Turkey
26 publications, 1.1%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 22, 0.93%
Australia
22 publications, 0.93%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 21, 0.89%
Canada
21 publications, 0.89%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 16, 0.68%
Jordan
16 publications, 0.68%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 16, 0.68%
Saudi Arabia
16 publications, 0.68%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 15, 0.64%
Algeria
15 publications, 0.64%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 14, 0.59%
Greece
14 publications, 0.59%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 14, 0.59%
Iraq
14 publications, 0.59%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 13, 0.55%
Nigeria
13 publications, 0.55%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 11, 0.47%
Malaysia
11 publications, 0.47%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 11, 0.47%
Republic of Korea
11 publications, 0.47%
|
France
|
France, 10, 0.42%
France
10 publications, 0.42%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 9, 0.38%
United Kingdom
9 publications, 0.38%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 9, 0.38%
Thailand
9 publications, 0.38%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 7, 0.3%
Bangladesh
7 publications, 0.3%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 7, 0.3%
Egypt
7 publications, 0.3%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 7, 0.3%
Oman
7 publications, 0.3%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 6, 0.25%
Ghana
6 publications, 0.25%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 6, 0.25%
Cameroon
6 publications, 0.25%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.21%
Norway
5 publications, 0.21%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.17%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.17%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 4, 0.17%
Bulgaria
4 publications, 0.17%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 0.13%
Germany
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.13%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.13%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.13%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 0.13%
Kuwait
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.13%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.13%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.13%
UAE
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.13%
Romania
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 3, 0.13%
Singapore
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 3, 0.13%
Trinidad and Tobago
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 3, 0.13%
Fiji
3 publications, 0.13%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.08%
Austria
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.08%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.08%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 2, 0.08%
Mauritius
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.08%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.08%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.08%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.04%
Russia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.04%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.04%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.04%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.04%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.04%
Israel
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.04%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.04%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.04%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.04%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 1, 0.04%
Syria
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.04%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.04%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.04%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.04%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.04%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.04%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Show all (33 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
India
|
India, 152, 41.76%
India
152 publications, 41.76%
|
China
|
China, 37, 10.16%
China
37 publications, 10.16%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 37, 10.16%
Iran
37 publications, 10.16%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 26, 7.14%
Pakistan
26 publications, 7.14%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 23, 6.32%
Turkey
23 publications, 6.32%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 11, 3.02%
Iraq
11 publications, 3.02%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 10, 2.75%
Algeria
10 publications, 2.75%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 6, 1.65%
Malaysia
6 publications, 1.65%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 5, 1.37%
Ghana
5 publications, 1.37%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 5, 1.37%
Cameroon
5 publications, 1.37%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 5, 1.37%
Saudi Arabia
5 publications, 1.37%
|
France
|
France, 4, 1.1%
France
4 publications, 1.1%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 1.1%
Egypt
4 publications, 1.1%
|
USA
|
USA, 3, 0.82%
USA
3 publications, 0.82%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 0.82%
Nigeria
3 publications, 0.82%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 2, 0.55%
Germany
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.55%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.55%
Greece
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 2, 0.55%
Canada
2 publications, 0.55%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.55%
UAE
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.55%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.55%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.27%
Russia
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 0.27%
Australia
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.27%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.27%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.27%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.27%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.27%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.27%
Norway
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.27%
Oman
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.27%
Romania
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.27%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.27%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.27%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.27%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.27%
|
Show all (6 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|