Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations

Brown University
(8 publications)

University of California, Irvine
(6 publications)

Yale University
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 707
Q2

Production and Characterization of Regenerated Cellulose Fiber Derived From Herbaceous Plants (Poaceae) With Ionic Liquids
Kashimoto A., Yagi S., Wataoka I., Okahisa Y.
ABSTRACTIn many countries around the world, weed infestations poses a significant obstacle to agricultural production and economic activity. However, these weeds are only considered for extermination, and their vast biomass is not utilized effectively. In this study, we attempted to convert weeds into regenerated cellulose fibers for high‐added value and effective use. Cellulose pulp obtained from herbaceous plants (Poaceae) of Andropogon virginicus and Miscanthus sinensis was dissolved in an ionic liquid (1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium chloride) to regenerate cellulose fibers. The properties and morphology of the regenerated cellulose fibers were evaluated, and the structure of the cellulose pulp obtained as an intermediate product was analyzed. The different extraction rates of these weeds resulted in differences in the degree of polymerization of the cellulose pulp. However, the regenerated cellulose fibers were successfully spun in both species. As the speed increased, the regenerated cellulose fibers became smoother, the fiber diameter decreased, and their mechanical properties improved. The regenerated celluloses fiber obtained from M. sinensis were comparable to rayon, an existing cellulose fiber, and exhibited similar values of fiber strength and modulus. These results indicated that the production of regenerated cellulose fibers from unused weeds was effective. This study demonstrates the potential of this materials as a new raw material.
Q2

Integrated Control of Verbesina encelioides in Common Bean Fields in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia
Fufa A., Tessema T., Bekeko Z., Mesfin T.
ABSTRACTVerbesina encelioides is known to threaten the performance of crops like common bean in central rift valley of Ethiopia. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of management on V. encelioides and common bean yield components and yield at Adamitulu and Melkassa. A randomized complete block design with four replications and twelve treatments was applied. Treatments included pre and postemergence herbicides (s‐metolachlor, pendimethalin, and sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop propargyl) and hand weeding. The density and biomass of V. encelioides were reduced by up to 94% and 81%, respectively, due to integrated control treatments. Beside the weed‐free plot, the use of s‐metolachlor plus hand weeding and pendimethalin plus hand weeding produced the lowest (3%–10%) weed index. Whereas these integrated controls gave the highest (74%–81%) weed control efficiency. Weed‐free plots yielded the highest grain (3.11 and 2.71 t/ha), followed by s‐metolachlor with two hand weedings (3.00 and 2.63 t/ha), while weedy check (0.49 and 0.45 t/ha) and sole pendimethalin 1.5 l/ha (1.28 and 1.12 t/ha) produced the least grain yield at Melkassa and Adamitulu, respectively. The use of s‐metolachlor plus one‐hand weeding, followed by two‐hand weeding, produced a maximum benefit‐cost ratio of 28.41 and 26.95 and an acceptable maximum marginal rate of return of 5689.06 and 5057.27 ETB, respectively. Thus, it is recommended that smetolachlor be used with one‐hand weeding followed by two‐hand weeding or sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop propargyl at 1 l/ha to achieve effective control, higher yield, and economic benefit in common bean production systems.
Q2

Implementation of Conventional and Smart Weed Management Strategies in Sustainable Agricultural Production
Xuan T.D., Khanh T.D., Minh T.T.
ABSTRACTConventional weed management is known for the use of selective herbicides, tackling issues of herbicide‐resistant weeds, and endeavors to reduce reliance on herbicides, such as employing biological control of weeds and incorporating allelopathy. These strategies are integrated with traditional and other conventional weed management techniques. New challenges in agricultural production, such as declining population involved in agriculture, global warming, and climate changes make conventional weed management inadequate. Rapid advancements over the past decade in artificial intelligence (AI), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), cameras, and sensors, necessitate the development and implementation of smart weed management (SWM) approaches for the 21st century. Wise weed management practices can control weeds and reduce emissions of methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Minimizing the use of herbicides in tandem with the application of smart technologies, like weed mapping and identifying spatial variability of weeds using proximal and remote sensors, multispectral and RGB cameras, can effectively manage weeds while also reducing labor costs. The SWM strategies also encompass the integrated use of organic herbicides, bioherbicidal products, and the judicious application of both organic fertilizers and inorganic fertilizers for weed management. Some approaches, such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD), can contribute to both SWM and carbon credits to farmers. The utilization of computing power, weed control robotics, and big data, combined with the education of the next generation of weed scientists and efforts to shift growers' attitudes and behaviors in weed management, may vary among countries. It requires active collaboration between agricultural extensionists and policymakers.
Q2

Volume Contents
Q2
Weed Biology and Management
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Guest reviewers
Q2
Weed Biology and Management
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Keyword Index
Q2
Weed Biology and Management
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Author Index
Q2
Weed Biology and Management
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Effect of vermicompost, intercropping, and seedbed types on Striga hermonthica infestation and sorghum production in East Hararghe, Ethiopia
Ebbisa A.F., Dechassa N., Bekeko Z., Liben F.
AbstractStriga hermonthica is the most devastating parasitic weed affecting the productivity of cereal crops in Sub‐Saharan Africa. The key challenge for controlling this weed is identifying the optimal management strategies that simultaneously reduce Striga infection while boosting crop productivity. This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of intercropping, vermicompost, and seedbed types on the level of S. hermonthica infestation and sorghum productivity in 2021 and 2022 years. The treatments consisted of three factors: (i) three sowing methods (sole‐cropped sorghum (SS), intercropped sorghum with Babile‐1 (SB1), and Babile‐2 (SB2) groundnut varieties); (ii) four levels of vermicompost (0, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 t/ha); and (iii) two seedbed types (open‐furrow and tied‐ridge). The results indicated that pure‐stand sorghum in open‐furrow planting without fertilizer had the tallest height (60 cm), the heaviest dry weight (39 g) as well as the highest Area under Striga Number Progress Curve (ASNPC) (>1200) in the first year with substantial reduction in successive year. The combination of 4.5 t/ha vermicompost, tied‐ridge, and groundnut intercropping gave the maximum sorghum panicle weight (151 g/plant), stover yield (14.21 t/ha), and grain yield (6.01 t/ha) in the year 2022. The greatest grain yield observed at 4.5 t/ha vermicompost under tied‐ridge with SB2 was nearly three times higher than the plot without vermicompost application. This treatment combination significantly suppresses S. hermonthica infestation while improving sorghum yield attributes. Thus, it could reduce food insecurity in the lowlands of Ethiopia via improving sorghum productivity, resources use efficiency, and soil health.
Q2

Effects of burial in soil on seed longevity and germinability of the winter annual weed wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum)
Nozarpour E., Edalat M., Soltani E., Baskin C.C., Baskin J.M., Kazemeini S.A.
AbstractHordeum spontaneum is a winter annual weed that reduces crop yields in Iran. The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the effects of burial on seed longevity and germinability and of water potential and temperature on germination. Seeds were placed in nylon‐mesh bags and buried in soil in a semi‐arid region on 1 July 2018 and exposed to natural temperature regimes. After 2 months of burial, seed viability started to decline with a slope of 0.0169%, and after 9 months all seeds were nonviable. Fresh seeds were dormant, but became non‐dormant during summer via dry after‐ripening. Thus, by late autumn (December) the seeds germinated to 100% in dark at 5 and 15°C. The base, optimum, and ceiling temperatures were 0.27, 17.5, and 25°C, respectively, at a water potential of 0 MPa. The hydrotime constant was 50.6–426.9 MPa h, base water potential −1.23 to −0.333 MPa and hydrothermal constant 1350.5 MPa °C h. These results can be used to predict timing and extent of weed emergence of H. spontaneum in crops and in planning for sustainable management strategies.
Q2

Resistance profile study of SU‐resistant Sagittaria trifolia in a comparison of seedlings and tuber‐derived plants
Ohta K., Sada Y.
AbstractSagittaria trifolia, a perennial weed of Alismataceae in Japanese rice paddies, has a single ALS gene, and both target and non‐target‐site resistance are known in the SU resistance of this species. In this study, the target‐site resistance profile at the whole‐plant and enzyme levels was investigated using self‐pollinated S1 seedlings from a parent plant heterozygous for a Pro197Ser ALS mutation and their clonal tubers. Our objectives were to reveal differences and similarities between whole‐plant resistance of seedlings to imazosulfuron and that of tuber‐derived plants and to correlate the whole‐plant responses to enzymatic inhibition, as well as to quantify the effects of mutant ALS allele stacking. Genotyping confirmed a Mendelian segregation ratio (1:2:1) among S1 plants for wild‐type, heterozygous, and homozygous ALS mutations. Enzymatic assays showed that resistance correlated with the number of mutant alleles, and heterozygous plants exhibited a double‐sigmoid curve plateauing at 50%, indicating the function of a 50:50 wild‐type to mutant enzyme ratio. Studies of tuber‐derived plants showed that resistance increased with more mutant alleles, but with a disproportionate jump over 3000‐fold from wild‐type to heterozygous, and only 5‐fold from heterozygous to homozygous, indicating a saturating tendency in the stacking effect of mutations. The dose response of S1 seedlings was consistent with Mendelian segregation of genotypes and suggested a similar saturation of resistance increase due to allele stacking as observed in tubers, with comparable dose–response patterns across identical genotypes.
Q2

Herbicide evaluation in direct seeded rice in the middle Gangetic plains of India
Upadhaya B., Tiwari R.K., Kishor K., Harsha B.R., Singh S.K., Kumar S., Kumar S.
AbstractA field experiment was conducted in Samastipur district of Bihar, India during kharif season of 2021 and 2022 to identify suitable herbicides for control of composite weed flora in direct seeded rice. Compared to weedy check, application of bispyribac sodium + pyrazosulfuron ethyl as tank mixture effectively reduced weed density at 50 days after seeding during both the cropping season (82% and 86%, respectively) and weed dry weight (7.62 and 7.18 g m−2, respectively) over control and as a result yielded maximum during both the cropping season (47.92 and 51.32 q ha−1, respectively). Based on overall performance, bispyribac sodium + pyrazosulfuron ethyl may be considered as viable weed management option in direct seeded rice for the rice growers of middle Indo‐Gangetic region.
Q2

Distributions of exotic herbaceous species along a roadside on Chichijima, the Ogasawara Islands, and their relationship with human disturbance
Eguchi A., Hata K., Numata S.
AbstractOceanic islands are a major tourist destination, and the invasion of exotic plants on oceanic islands is a serious problem. To discuss how exotic herbaceous plant invasion is driven by human disturbance on an oceanic island, we assessed the distribution patterns of exotic herbaceous species along a metropolitan road, including parking lots, on the island of Chichijima in the Ogasawara Islands of Japan in the North Pacific Ocean. We observed 16 exotic herbaceous species representing seven families, and all the species have also been recorded in surveys 25 years ago. Species richness (number of species per plot) ranged from 0 to 9 with an average of 2.49. Distance from a parking lot was significantly negatively related to the distribution patterns of seven species and positively related to three species, pointing to parking lots being critical nodes along the dispersal pathways of exotic herbaceous species in Chichijima. Although roads are well known to play an important role as corridors for the invasion and seed dispersal of exotic plants, our results suggest that it would also be important to consider the location of parking lots to understand the distribution of exotic herbaceous species in road networks. We suggest that intensive weed management near parking lots and car wash protocols on Chichijima may be effective in halting exotic species spread.
Q2

Differences in soil seed longevity for two subspecies of the invasive weed, Chrysanthemoides monilifera (Asteraceae)
French K., Ashcroft M.B., Panetta F.D., Raghu S., Cherry H.
AbstractThe persistence of a soil seed bank influences weed management options. However, for many species, the degree of persistence of a soil seed bank is unknown. We assessed how long seeds remain in the soil for two invasive weeds, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera (boneseed) and C. monilifera subsp. rotundata (bitou bush), as seeds of these species were predicted to have different longevity in the soil associated with differences in seed coat thickness. Seeds of both subspecies were buried at two depths at two sites in eastern Australia. Seeds were tested for germinability and viability regularly over an 8‐year period. Freshly collected seeds had quite low viability, and there was a rapid decline in viability in the first couple of years after burial, with C. m. rotundata declining faster than C. m. monilifera. Some seeds, however, remained viable in the soil at some sites for up to 8 years, with high site‐to‐site variability. The variability in viability from site to site may be due to the length of time soils remain moist: a combination of rainfall quantity and humidity levels. The low numbers of seeds remaining viable at 8 years indicate progressively lower probabilities of recruitment at sites following weed control but also suggest that monitoring for both subspecies needs to occur for a long period to minimize the risk of reinfestation from the seed bank.
Q2

Field validation of 4,8‐dihydroxy‐1‐tetrahydronaphthone phytotoxicity on forestland weeds and physiological mechanism analysis on Lindernia procumbens
Yang L., Wang J., Hu Q., Liu Y., Ruan X., Qu A., Wang Q.
Abstract4,8‐Dihydroxy‐1‐tetrahydronaphthone (4,8‐DHT), an allelochemical, was isolated from the Carya cathayensis epicarp and was discovered to have phytotoxicity in laboratory tests. In this study, field experiments were designed to assess the phytotoxicity of 4,8‐DHT on weeds in Cerasus yedoensis and Lagerstroemia indica forestlands after pre‐ and post‐emergence application, in addition to physiological effect on Lindernia procumbens were also measured. The phytotoxic results of 4,8‐DHT demonstrated that the total inhibition rate of weeds was 81.3% and 68.2% in C. yedoensis forestland and L. indica forestland after pre‐emergence applied for 24 days in 2021, and enhanced by 9.9% and 27.8% compared with post‐emergence treatment. Especially, in C. yedoensis forestland, a high concentration of 4,8‐DHT sprayed at the pre‐emergence stage after 8 days had a significant inhibition rate on all weeds except Cyperus rotundus, and was still above 80.0% after 24 days of exposure. Comprehensive control efficacy of 4,8‐DHT indicates that pre‐emergence application is more favorable for weeds control. Physiological analysis showed that 4,8‐DHT stimulated the contents of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and proline and declined in the activities of antioxidant enzymes, meanwhile, accompanied by a decrease in the root vitality and chlorophyll content in L. procumbens. These results warrant further investigations of 4,8‐DHT applied in early pre‐emergence as a potential source of weed control agent.
Q2

Effect of different weed control techniques on the leaf yield and nutritional qualities of Ocimum sanctum
Osadebe V.O., Ukwu U.N., Dauda N., Nwamba I.M., Ede A.E., Enyi J.I., Onah A.I.
AbstractOcimum sanctum is a leaf‐vegetable and spice crop with several nutritional, therapeutic, and curative properties. Economic losses due to weeds have posed a major challenge to farmers, who have adopted different techniques to manage weeds without regard to its effect on the crop's nutritional qualities. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of weed control techniques on weed eradication, leaf yield, and nutritional qualities of O. sanctum. Nine weed control techniques comprising black, red, and transparent polyethylene mulches, rice husk and sawdust mulches, daily removal of weed (DROW), hoe‐weeded, application of Haloxyfop post‐emergence herbicide spray (PEHS), and un‐weeded were investigated in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Significant variations in leaf‐yield and nutritional qualities among the different weed control techniques were recorded. Leaf yield was higher in plots treated with rice husk and black polyethylene mulches. Haloxyfop PEHS and transparent polyethylene mulch were superior in enhancing the proximate and vitamin contents of O. sanctum while black polyethylene and DROW were more efficient in weed control compared with the other weed control techniques. The use of polyethylene mulch as an effective weed management option offers numerous benefits for agriculture and gardening. Its ability to conserve moisture, suppress weed growth, and improve the crop microclimate, makes it a sustainable and cost‐effective option for farmers globally. Additionally, the use of herbicide to exploit plant biosynthetic pathways could lead to the unearthing of chemical innovations that could in addition to eradicating weed, also improve the nutritional qualities of crop.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
Synthese
560 citations, 3.6%
|
|
Philosophical Studies
488 citations, 3.13%
|
|
Erkenntnis
239 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
184 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Philosophy Compass
167 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Philosophical Psychology
152 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Inquiry (United Kingdom)
149 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
145 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Philosophia (United States)
141 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
132 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Nous
119 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Mind and Language
108 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Philosophy
102 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Acta Analytica
88 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Philosophical Quarterly
83 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
78 citations, 0.5%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
76 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
74 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
74 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Mind
71 citations, 0.46%
|
|
European Journal of Philosophy
69 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Dialectica
69 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Theoria
64 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Topoi
60 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review
59 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
57 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Metaphilosophy
57 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Midwest Studies in Philosophy
51 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Ethics
51 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Analysis
51 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Southern Journal of Philosophy
51 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Philosophical Explorations
51 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Around the Tree
51 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Linguistics and Philosophy
48 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Metaphysica
48 citations, 0.31%
|
|
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
46 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Social Philosophy
42 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues
41 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives
41 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Analytic Philosophy
41 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Episteme
39 citations, 0.25%
|
|
The Philosophical Review
38 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
37 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of the American Philosophical Association
37 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Cognition
37 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
36 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Religious Studies
35 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Ethics
34 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Res Philosophica
30 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Philosophy of Science
30 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Biology and Philosophy
30 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
27 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Ratio
25 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
25 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Disputatio
24 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Philosophical Studies
24 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Philosophical Logic
24 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Philosophical Papers
24 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
24 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Philosophy
23 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Axiomathes
22 citations, 0.14%
|
|
The Monist
22 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology
22 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Philosophy and Technology
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Philosophy and Policy
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
20 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
20 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Consciousness and Cognition
20 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Business Ethics Quarterly
20 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
19 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Religions
17 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Value Inquiry
17 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
17 citations, 0.11%
|
|
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Philosophia Mathematica
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Pragmatics
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Language and Communication
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Res Publica
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Moral Education
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Characterizing the Robustness of Science
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Handbook of African Philosophy
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Ethics, Policy and Environment
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Moral Philosophy
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Military Ethics
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Philosophical Investigations
14 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Language Sciences
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Minds and Machines
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
AI and Society
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Philosophies
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Utilitas
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Argumentation
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Medical Ethics
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Asian Journal of Philosophy
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Metaphysics
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
Springer Nature
2930 citations, 18.82%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1796 citations, 11.54%
|
|
Wiley
1698 citations, 10.91%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
984 citations, 6.32%
|
|
Oxford University Press
915 citations, 5.88%
|
|
Elsevier
387 citations, 2.49%
|
|
SAGE
207 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
140 citations, 0.9%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
93 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
76 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Duke University Press
69 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
67 citations, 0.43%
|
|
MDPI
63 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Brill
45 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Emerald
43 citations, 0.28%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
43 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Philosophy Documentation Center, Saint Louis University
36 citations, 0.23%
|
|
The Philosophy Centre of the University of Lisbon
30 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SciELO
23 citations, 0.15%
|
|
University of Illinois Press
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
CAIRN
20 citations, 0.13%
|
|
OpenEdition
17 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
14 citations, 0.09%
|
|
BMJ
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Royal Society
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Pittsburgh
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Annual Reviews
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOS Press
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Academy of Management
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IGI Global
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
MIT Press
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Berghahn Books
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Intellect
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Bialystok
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Imprint Academic
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Associazone culturale Pragma
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Open Library of Humanities
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Massachusetts
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Revus Klub
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
White Horse Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Biola University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Association Centre Sevres
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society for Values in Higher Education
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Samara National Research University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
JMIR Publications
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Marketing Association
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
World Scientific
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
University of California Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Indiana University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Firenze University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Numdam (Numerisation de Documents Anciens Mathematiques)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Architectural Institute of Japan
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Delachaux et Niestle
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Ministere de la Culture
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Tongji University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Economic Association
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Publishing organizations
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
Brown University
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Yale University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Michigan
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Arizona
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Oxford
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Syracuse University
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
3 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Ege University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Southern California
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Princeton University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of South Florida
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Minnesota
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Temple University
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Toronto
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Connecticut
2 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Nottingham
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Iowa State University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Washington State University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Virginia Tech
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
San Francisco State University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Swansea University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Tulane University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Dartmouth College
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Minnesota Morris
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Reading
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Exeter
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Louisville
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Delaware
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Texas A&M University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Wesleyan University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Lethbridge
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
University of Hull
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (35 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
USA
|
USA, 136, 12.82%
USA
136 publications, 12.82%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 13, 1.23%
United Kingdom
13 publications, 1.23%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 0.28%
Canada
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.19%
Italy
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.19%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 0.09%
Australia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.09%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.09%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.09%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|