UCLA Health

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
UCLA Health
Short name
UCLAH
Country, city
USA, Los Angeles
Publications
769
Citations
12 853
h-index
56
Top-3 journals
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology (32 publications)
Heart Rhythm
Heart Rhythm (26 publications)
Top-3 organizations
Harvard University
Harvard University (42 publications)
Top-3 foreign organizations
University of Toronto
University of Toronto (14 publications)
Kobe University
Kobe University (11 publications)

Most cited in 5 years

Jew B., Alvarez M., Rahmani E., Miao Z., Ko A., Garske K.M., Sul J.H., Pietiläinen K.H., Pajukanta P., Halperin E.
Nature Communications scimago Q1 wos Q1 Open Access
2020-04-24 citations by CoLab: 293 PDF Abstract  
We present Bisque, a tool for estimating cell type proportions in bulk expression. Bisque implements a regression-based approach that utilizes single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) or single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) data to generate a reference expression profile and learn gene-specific bulk expression transformations to robustly decompose RNA-seq data. These transformations significantly improve decomposition performance compared to existing methods when there is significant technical variation in the generation of the reference profile and observed bulk expression. Importantly, compared to existing methods, our approach is extremely efficient, making it suitable for the analysis of large genomic datasets that are becoming ubiquitous. When applied to subcutaneous adipose and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex expression datasets with both bulk RNA-seq and snRNA-seq data, Bisque replicates previously reported associations between cell type proportions and measured phenotypes across abundant and rare cell types. We further propose an additional mode of operation that merely requires a set of known marker genes. Traditional methods for determining cell type composition lack scalability, while single-cell technologies remain costly and noisy compared to bulk RNA-seq. Here, the authors present a highly efficient tool to measure cellular heterogeneity in bulk expression through robust integration of single-cell information.
Dai H., Saccardo S., Han M.A., Roh L., Raja N., Vangala S., Modi H., Pandya S., Sloyan M., Croymans D.M.
Nature scimago Q1 wos Q1
2021-08-02 citations by CoLab: 278 Abstract  
Enhancing vaccine uptake is a critical public health challenge1. Overcoming vaccine hesitancy2,3 and failure to follow through on vaccination intentions3 requires effective communication strategies3,4. Here we present two sequential randomized controlled trials to test the effect of behavioural interventions on the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. We designed text-based reminders that make vaccination salient and easy, and delivered them to participants drawn from a healthcare system one day (first randomized controlled trial) (n = 93,354 participants; clinicaltrials number NCT04800965) and eight days (second randomized controlled trial) (n = 67,092 individuals; clinicaltrials number NCT04801524) after they received a notification of vaccine eligibility. The first reminder boosted appointment and vaccination rates within the healthcare system by 6.07 (84%) and 3.57 (26%) percentage points, respectively; the second reminder increased those outcomes by 1.65 and 1.06 percentage points, respectively. The first reminder had a greater effect when it was designed to make participants feel ownership of the vaccine dose. However, we found no evidence that combining the first reminder with a video-based information intervention designed to address vaccine hesitancy heightened its effect. We performed online studies (n = 3,181 participants) to examine vaccination intentions, which revealed patterns that diverged from those of the first randomized controlled trial; this underscores the importance of pilot-testing interventions in the field. Our findings inform the design of behavioural nudges for promoting health decisions5, and highlight the value of making vaccination easy and inducing feelings of ownership over vaccines. Two randomized controlled trials demonstrate the ability of text-based behavioural ‘nudges’ to improve the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines, especially when designed to make participants feel ownership over their vaccine dose.
Chawla S., Blay J., Rutkowski P., Le Cesne A., Reichardt P., Gelderblom H., Grimer R.J., Choy E., Skubitz K., Seeger L., Schuetze S.M., Henshaw R., Dai T., Jandial D., Palmerini E.
The Lancet Oncology scimago Q1 wos Q1
2019-12-01 citations by CoLab: 175 Abstract  
Giant-cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a rare, locally aggressive osteoclastogenic stromal tumour of the bone. This phase 2 study aimed to assess the safety and activity of denosumab in patients with surgically salvageable or unsalvageable GCTB.In this multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study done at 30 sites in 12 countries we enrolled adults and skeletally mature adolescents (aged ≥12 years) weighing at least 45 kg with histologically confirmed and radiographically measurable GCTB, Karnofsky performance status 50% or higher (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0, 1, or 2), and measurable active disease within 1 year of study enrolment. Patients had surgically unsalvageable GCTB (cohort 1), had surgically salvageable GCTB with planned surgery expected to result in severe morbidity (cohort 2), or were enrolled from a previous study of denosumab for GCTB (cohort 3). Patients received 120 mg subcutaneous denosumab once every 4 weeks during the treatment phase, with loading doses (120 mg subcutaneously) administered on study days 8 and 15 to patients in cohorts 1 and 2 (patients in cohort 3 did not receive loading doses). The primary endpoint was safety in terms of the type, frequency, and severity of adverse events; secondary endpoints included time to disease progression from cohort 1 and the proportion of patients without surgery at month 6 for cohort 2. The safety analysis set included all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of denosumab. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00680992, and has been completed.Between Sept 9, 2008, and Feb 25, 2016, 532 patients were enrolled: 267 in cohort 1, 253 in cohort 2, and 12 in cohort 3. At data cutoff on Feb 24, 2017, median follow-up was 58·1 months (IQR 34·0-74·4) in the overall patient population, and 65·8 months (40·9-82·4) in cohort 1, 53·4 months (28·2-64·1) in cohort 2, and 76·4 months (61·2-76·5) in cohort 3. During the treatment phase, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypophosphataemia (24 [5%] of 526 patients), osteonecrosis of the jaw (17 [3%], pain in extremity (12 [2%]), and anaemia (11 [2%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 138 (26%) of 526 patients; the most common were osteonecrosis of the jaw (17 [3%]), anaemia (6 [1%]), bone giant cell tumour (6 [1%]), and back pain (5 [1%]). 28 (5%) patients had positively adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw, four (1%) had atypical femur fracture, and four (1%) had hypercalcaemia occurring 30 days after denosumab discontinuation. There were four cases (1%) of sarcomatous transformation, consistent with historical data. Ten (2%) treatment-emergent deaths occurred (two of which were considered treatment-related; bone sarcoma in cohort 2 and sarcoma in cohort 1). Median time to progression or recurrence for patients in cohort 1 during the first treatment phase was not reached (28 [11%] of 262 patients had progression or recurrence). 227 (92%; 95% CI 87-95) of 248 patients who received at least one dose of denosumab in cohort 2 had no surgery in the first 6 months of the study.The types and frequencies of adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of denosumab, which showed long-term disease control for patients with GCTB with unresectable and resectable tumours. Our results suggest that the overall risk to benefit ratio for denosumab treatment in patients with GCTB remains favourable.Amgen.
Murphy C.N., Fowler R., Balada-Llasat J.M., Carroll A., Stone H., Akerele O., Buchan B., Windham S., Hopp A., Ronen S., Relich R.F., Buckner R., Warren D.A., Humphries R., Campeau S., et. al.
2020-06-24 citations by CoLab: 148 Abstract  
The ability to provide timely identification of the causative agents of lower respiratory tract infections can promote better patient outcomes and support antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Current diagnostic testing options include culture, molecular testing, and antigen detection. These methods may require collection of various specimens, involve extensive sample treatment, and can suffer from low sensitivity and long turnaround times. This study assessed the performance of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PN panel) and Pneumonia Plus Panel (PNplus panel), an FDA-cleared sample-to-answer assay that enables the detection of viruses, atypical bacteria, bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance marker genes from lower respiratory tract specimens (sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] fluid).
Shah M.A., Kennedy E.B., Alarcon-Rozas A.E., Alcindor T., Bartley A.N., Malowany A.B., Bhadkamkar N.A., Deighton D.C., Janjigian Y., Karippot A., Khan U., King D.A., Klute K., Lacy J., Lee J.J., et. al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology scimago Q1 wos Q1
2023-03-01 citations by CoLab: 103 Abstract  
PURPOSE To develop recommendations involving targeted therapies for patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice. RESULTS Eighteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. RECOMMENDATIONS For human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (AC) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5, first-line therapy with nivolumab and chemotherapy (CT) is recommended. For HER2-negative patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) AC and PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5, first-line therapy with nivolumab and CT is recommended. First-line therapy with pembrolizumab and CT is recommended for HER2-negative patients with esophageal or GEJ AC and PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10. For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 1%, nivolumab plus CT, or nivolumab plus ipilimumab is recommended; for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10, pembrolizumab plus CT is recommended. For patients with HER2-positive gastric or GEJ previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic AC, trastuzumab plus pembrolizumab is recommended, in combination with CT. For patients with advanced gastroesophageal or GEJ AC whose disease has progressed after first-line therapy, ramucirumab plus paclitaxel is recommended. For HER2-positive patients with gastric or GEJ AC who have progressed after first-line therapy, trastuzumab deruxtecan is recommended. In all cases, participation in a clinical trial is recommended as it is the panel's expectation that targeted treatment options for gastroesophageal cancer will continue to evolve. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .
Day L.W., Muthusamy V.R., Collins J., Kushnir V.M., Sawhney M.S., Thosani N.C., Wani S.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy scimago Q1 wos Q1
2021-01-01 citations by CoLab: 91 Abstract  
Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is highly effective for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of many digestive diseases.1 Endoscopes used in endoscopy are complex, diverse, and essential devices that require meticulous cleaning and reprocessing in strict accordance with manufacturer guidelines before being reused on patients. Multiple risks are associated with endoscopic procedures; one such risk includes patients developing an exogenous infection (ie, pathogen introduced through a contaminated device).
Kamdar N.V., Huverserian A., Jalilian L., Thi W., Duval V., Beck L., Brooker L., Grogan T., Lin A., Cannesson M.
Anesthesia and Analgesia scimago Q1 wos Q1
2020-08-25 citations by CoLab: 76 Abstract  
With health care practice consolidation, the increasing geographic scope of health care systems, and the advancement of mobile telecommunications, there is increasing interest in telemedicine-based health care consultations. Anesthesiology has had experience with telemedicine consultation for preoperative evaluation since 2004, but the majority of studies have been conducted in rural settings. There is a paucity of literature of use in metropolitan areas. In this article, we describe the implementation of a telemedicine-based anesthesia preoperative evaluation and report the program's patient satisfaction, clinical case cancellation rate outcomes, and cost savings in a large metropolitan area (Los Angeles, CA).This is a descriptive study of a telemedicine-based preoperative anesthesia evaluation process in an academic medical center within a large metropolitan area. In a 2-year period, we evaluated 419 patients scheduled for surgery by telemedicine and 1785 patients who were evaluated in-person.Day-of-surgery case cancellations were 2.95% and 3.23% in the telemedicine and the in-person cohort, respectively. Telemedicine patients avoided a median round trip driving distance of 63 miles (Q1 24; Q3 119) and a median time saved of 137 (Q1 95; Q3 195) and 130 (Q1 91; Q3 237) minutes during morning and afternoon traffic conditions, respectively. Patients experienced time-based savings, particularly from traveling across a metropolitan area, which amounted to $67 of direct and opportunity cost savings. From patient satisfaction surveys, 98% (129 patients out of 131 completed surveys) of patients who were consulted via telemedicine were satisfied with their experience.This study demonstrates the implementation of a telemedicine-based preoperative anesthesia evaluation from an academic medical center in a metropolitan area with high patient satisfaction, cost savings, and without increase in day-of-procedure case cancellations.
Toh H., Mori S., Izawa Y., Fujita H., Miwa K., Suzuki M., Takahashi Y., Toba T., Watanabe Y., Kono A.K., Tretter J.T., Hirata K.
2021-03-13 citations by CoLab: 76 Abstract  
Abstract Aims Mitral annular disjunction is fibrous separation between the attachment of the posterior mitral leaflet and the basal left ventricular myocardium initially described in dissected hearts. Currently, it is commonly evaluated by echocardiography, and potential relationships with mitral valve prolapse and ventricular arrhythmia have been suggested. However, controversy remains as its prevalence and extent have not been fully elucidated in normal living subjects. Methods and results Systolic datasets of cardiac computed tomography obtained from 98 patients (mean age, 69.1 ± 12.6 years; 81% men) with structurally normal hearts were assessed retrospectively. Circumferential extent of both mitral leaflets and disjunction was determined by rotating orthogonal multiplanar reconstruction images around the central axis of the mitral valvar orifice. Distribution angle within the circumference of the mitral valvar attachment and maximal height of disjunction were quantified. In total, 96.0% of patients demonstrated disjunction. Average distribution angles of the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets were 91.3 ± 9.4° and 269.8 ± 9.7°, respectively. Average distribution angle of the disjunction was 105.1 ± 49.2°, corresponding to 39.0 ± 18.2% of the entire posterior mitral valvar attachment. Median value of the maximal height of disjunction was 3.0 (1.5–7.0) mm. Distribution prevalence map of the disjunction revealed characteristic double peaks, with frequent sites of the disjunction located at the anterior to antero-lateral and inferior to infero-septal regions. Conclusion Mitral annular disjunction is a rather common finding in the normal adult heart with bimodal distribution predominantly observed involving the P1 and P3 scallops of the posterior mitral leaflet.
Nielsen J.C., Lin Y., de Oliveira Figueiredo M.J., Sepehri Shamloo A., Alfie A., Boveda S., Dagres N., Di Toro D., Eckhardt L.L., Ellenbogen K., Hardy C., Ikeda T., Jaswal A., Kaufman E., Krahn A., et. al.
Europace scimago Q1 wos Q1
2020-06-15 citations by CoLab: 74
Alvarez M., Rahmani E., Jew B., Garske K.M., Miao Z., Benhammou J.N., Ye C.J., Pisegna J.R., Pietiläinen K.H., Halperin E., Pajukanta P.
Scientific Reports scimago Q1 wos Q1 Open Access
2020-07-03 citations by CoLab: 73 PDF Abstract  
Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) measures gene expression in individual nuclei instead of cells, allowing for unbiased cell type characterization in solid tissues. We observe that snRNA-seq is commonly subject to contamination by high amounts of ambient RNA, which can lead to biased downstream analyses, such as identification of spurious cell types if overlooked. We present a novel approach to quantify contamination and filter droplets in snRNA-seq experiments, called Debris Identification using Expectation Maximization (DIEM). Our likelihood-based approach models the gene expression distribution of debris and cell types, which are estimated using EM. We evaluated DIEM using three snRNA-seq data sets: (1) human differentiating preadipocytes in vitro, (2) fresh mouse brain tissue, and (3) human frozen adipose tissue (AT) from six individuals. All three data sets showed evidence of extranuclear RNA contamination, and we observed that existing methods fail to account for contaminated droplets and led to spurious cell types. When compared to filtering using these state of the art methods, DIEM better removed droplets containing high levels of extranuclear RNA and led to higher quality clusters. Although DIEM was designed for snRNA-seq, our clustering strategy also successfully filtered single-cell RNA-seq data. To conclude, our novel method DIEM removes debris-contaminated droplets from single-cell-based data fast and effectively, leading to cleaner downstream analysis. Our code is freely available for use at https://github.com/marcalva/diem.
Fasching P.A., Slamon D., Nowecki Z., Kukielka-Budny B., Stroyakovskiy D., Yardley D.A., Huang C., Chan A., Chia S., Martín M., Rugo H.S., Loi S., Hurvitz S., Untch M., Afenjar K., et. al.
Clinical Cancer Research scimago Q1 wos Q1
2025-03-28 citations by CoLab: 1 Abstract  
Abstract Purpose: The phase III NATALEE trial reported a statistically significant invasive disease-free survival benefit with ribociclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) versus an NSAI alone in stage II/III hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) early breast cancer. In this study, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data from NATALEE. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized to receive ribociclib plus NSAI or NSAI alone. Patient-reported outcome scores [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire global health status and physical, social, and emotional functioning domains; the supplementary European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer–specific QOL questionnaire breast symptoms scale; health on a visual analog scale of the generic EuroQOL 5-level instrument; and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale] were assessed. The prespecified primary HRQOL endpoint was physical functioning. Mean scores and time-categorical and prespecified linear-time repeated-measure models were used to evaluate HRQOL changes during treatment. Results: HRQOL was evaluated in all patients in the ribociclib plus NSAI (n = 2,549) and NSAI alone (n = 2,552) arms. Compliance was high in both arms (≈93%–97%). Mean scores did not differ meaningfully from baseline for any analyzed domain. Likewise, neither a meaningful change from baseline (in either treatment arm) nor a difference between arms was observed during treatment in the time-categorical, model-adjusted mean scores for any HRQOL domains—using published thresholds for interpreting longitudinal and between-group differences, with all values being within 0.5 SD of their baseline values. Linear-time regression analysis confirmed these findings. Conclusions: These analyses of NATALEE show that adding adjuvant ribociclib to an NSAI does not negatively affect HRQOL in patients with HR+/HER2− early breast cancer.
Reuben D.B., Gill T.M., Stevens A., Williamson J., Volpi E., Lichtenstein M., Jennings L.A., Galloway R., Summapund J., Araujo K., Bass D., Weitzman L., Tan Z.S., Evertson L., Yang M., et. al.
2025-03-18 citations by CoLab: 3 Abstract  
ImportanceThe effectiveness of different approaches to dementia care is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of health system–based, community-based dementia care, and usual care for persons with dementia and for caregiver outcomes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRandomized clinical trial of community-dwelling persons living with dementia and their caregivers conducted at 4 sites in the US (enrollment June 2019-January 2023; final follow-up, August 2023).InterventionsParticipants were randomized 7:7:1 to health system–based care provided by an advanced practice dementia care specialist (n = 1016); community-based care provided by a social worker, nurse, or licensed therapist care consultant (n = 1016); or usual care (n = 144).Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcomes were caregiver-reported Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) severity score for persons living with dementia (range, 0-36; higher scores, greater behavioral symptoms severity; minimal clinically important difference [MCID], 2.8-3.2) and Modified Caregiver Strain Index for caregivers (range, 0-26; higher scores, greater strain; MCID, 1.5-2.3). Three secondary outcomes included caregiver self-efficacy (range, 4-20; higher scores, more self-efficacy).ResultsAmong 2176 dyads (individuals with dementia, mean age, 80.6 years; 58.4%, female; and 20.6%, Black or Hispanic; caregivers, mean age, 65.2 years; 75.8%, female; and 20.8% Black or Hispanic), primary outcomes were assessed for more than 99% of participants, and 1343 participants (62% of those enrolled and 91% still alive and had not withdrawn) completed the study through 18 months. No significant differences existed between the 2 treatments or between treatments vs usual care for the primary outcomes. Overall, the least squares means (LSMs) for NPI-Q scores were 9.8 for health system, 9.5 for community-based, and 10.1 for usual care. The difference between health system vs community-based care was 0.30 (97.5% CI, −0.18 to 0.78); health system vs usual care, −0.33 (97.5% CI, −1.32 to 0.67); and community-based vs usual care, −0.62 (97.5% CI, −1.61 to 0.37). The LSMs for the Modified Caregiver Strain Index were 10.7 for health system, 10.5 for community-based, and 10.6 for usual care. The difference between health system vs community-based care was 0.25 (97.5% CI, −0.16 to 0.66); health system vs usual care, 0.14 (97.5% CI, −0.70 to 0.99); and community-based vs usual care, −0.10 (97.5% CI, −0.94 to 0.74). Only the secondary outcome of caregiver self-efficacy was significantly higher for both treatments vs usual care but not between treatments: LSMs were 15.1 for health system, 15.2 for community-based, and 14.4 for usual care. The difference between health system vs community-based care was −0.16 (95% CI, −0.37 to 0.06); health system vs usual care, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.26-1.14); and community-based vs usual care, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.29).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized trial of dementia care programs, no significant differences existed between health system–based and community-based care interventions nor between either active intervention or usual care regarding patient behavioral symptoms and caregiver strain.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03786471
DelBaugh R.M., Murphy M.F., Staves J., Fachini R.M., Wendel S., Hands K., Bonet‐Bub C., Kutner J.M., Cohn C.S., Cox C.A., Jacquot C., Hasan R.A., Lu W., Juskewitch J.E., Raval J.S., et. al.
Transfusion scimago Q1 wos Q2
2025-03-10 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
AbstractBackgroundRho(D) immune globulin (RhIg) is used to reduce RhD alloimmunization in pregnancy. This study describes potential causes for RhD alloimmunization after the development and implementation of RhIg.Study Design and MethodsThis retrospective descriptive study investigated RhD‐negative patients born in 1965–2005 with anti‐D newly identified during 2018–2022. Transfusion, pregnancy, intravenous drug abuse, and transplantation were considered potential alloimmunization sources.ResultsThere were 1200 study patients (852 females; 348 males) at 30 institutions in 5 countries (USA, Canada, UK, New Zealand, Brazil). Most patients had a single potential source of alloimmunization identified (857/1200, 71%), most commonly pregnancy among females (537/852, 63%) and transfusion among males (180/348, 52%). When multiple potential sources were included, males were more likely than females to have a history of transfusion (235/348 [68%] vs. 149/852 [17%], p < .0001) and confirmed or suspected intravenous drug abuse (100/348 [29%] vs. 138/852 [16%], p < .0001). Among females with a history of pregnancy, 119/718 (17%) had healthcare access issues, 120/718 (17%) had pregnancy in a country where they may not have received RhIg, and 21/718 (3%) refused RhIg. Among patients with a history of transfusion, males were more likely than females to have received RhD‐positive red blood cells or whole blood (143/235 [61%] vs. 30/149 [20%], p < .0001) and/or platelets (84/235 [36%] vs. 19/149 [13%], p < .0001).DiscussionPregnancy was the most frequently identified potential source of RhD alloimmunization among females. Transfusion was most frequent in males. Intravenous drug abuse as a common potential source among patients with RhD alloimmunization merits further study.
Girard N., Besada M., Rogula B., Lucherini S., Vo L., Chaudhary M.A., Goring S., Lozano-Ortega G., Tran M., Varol N., Waser N., Yu W.W., Lee J.M., Spicer J.
Cancers scimago Q1 wos Q1 Open Access
2025-02-17 citations by CoLab: 0 PDF Abstract  
Winifred W. Yu was not included as an author in the original publication [...]
Laflamme M., Gasbarrini A., Rhines L.D., Lazary A., Gokaslan Z.L., Reynolds J.J., Luzzati A., Disch A.C., Chou D., Clarke M.J., Wei F., Bettegowda C., Rampersaud Y.R., Boriani S., Shin J.H., et. al.
Neurosurgery scimago Q1 wos Q1 Open Access
2025-02-05 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Aggressive resection for primary tumors of the spine are associated with a high rate of adverse events (AEs), but the impact of AEs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains unknown and is critical to the shared decision-making. Our primary objective was to assess the impact of surgical AEs on PROs using an international registry. Assessing the impact on clinical outcomes and identifying risk factors for AEs were our secondary objectives. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for a primary spinal tumor were selected through the Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network. Our primary outcome was the impact of AEs on PROs at 3 and 12 months after surgery (measured with Spinal Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire, Short-Form 36, and EuroQol 5 Dimension). We also assessed the impact on clinical outcomes (local control, surgical margins, readmission, reoperation, and mortality). We stratified our results according to severity of AEs, histology, and type of resection. RESULTS: 374 patients met inclusion criteria (219 males/155 females). The mean age of the cohort was 48.7 years. The most frequent histology was chordoma (37.3%) followed by chondrosarcoma (8.8%). Sixty-seven patients (17.9%) experienced at least 1 intraoperative AE and 117 patients (31.3%) had at least 1 postoperative AE within 3 months. Overall, 159 patients (42.5%) experienced AEs. The readmission rate was significantly higher in patients who experienced AEs (Any AE: 10.1% vs no AE: 1.9% within 3 months; P = <0.001). PROs were not significantly affected by AEs in most questionnaires. Local control, risk of reoperation, mortality, and achieving preplanned margins were similar between AE groups. CONCLUSION: The rate of surgical AEs is considerable in this population. Surgical AEs seem to be associated with a higher number of readmissions, but do not seem to result in significant differences in PROs or in a higher risk of reoperation, mortality, and failure to achieve preplanned margins.
Obreja V., Marcarian T., Miller P.S.
Critical Care Nurse scimago Q1 wos Q2
2025-02-01 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
Background For patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, early mobility decreases mechanical ventilation time, delirium incidence, and length of intensive care unit stay and improves physical functioning. Individual centers use institutional guidelines to develop ambulation protocols. Local Problem A quality improvement initiative was used to evaluate an ambulation protocol for adult intensive care unit patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Methods Adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who walked according to the protocol were compared with a historical control group of patients who walked without the protocol. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and independent t tests. Outcomes included adverse safety events, number of patients and ambulation sessions, standing and ambulation time, and distance. Results From January to March 2021, 13 of 46 patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (28%) walked according to the protocol. In the control group, 14 of 147 patients (10%) walked in 2019; 21 of 144 patients (15%) walked in 2020. Some characteristics of the control group (hospitalized before the COVID-19 pandemic) differed from those of the protocol group (hospitalized during the pandemic). Mean number of ambulation sessions was not significantly different between groups (protocol group, 10; control group, 9). Differences in mean standing time (protocol group, 121.23 minutes; control group, 210.80 minutes), ambulation time (protocol group, 11.77 minutes; control group, 198.70 minutes), and ambulation distance were not significant. Conclusions Standing time, ambulation time, and distance were not significantly different between the groups. The extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ambulation protocol demonstrated clinical significance by increasing the number of patients walking.
Kozakowski K., Okonkwo N.
Stroke scimago Q1 wos Q1
2025-02-01 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
Background: A mandatory educational requirement for nurses and staff at designated stroke centers existed within a health system, but the process varied across sites. Staff selected their own educational content, leading to minimal engagement and irrelevant content. The transition of the electronic health record (EHR) to Within Defined Limits (WDL) further complicated documentation. To address these issues, the Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) and the Critical Care Nurse Professional Development Specialist (CC NPDS) collaborated with stakeholders to overhaul stroke education, nursing documentation, and patient care at two hospitals. Purpose: The goal was to standardize and streamline stroke education and EHR documentation system-wide, enhance nursing knowledge and improve patient care and outcomes for stroke patients. Methods: The NPDS and CNS conducted a current state analysis and gathered feedback about the need for meaningful education and streamlined processes. They developed and refined four core educational modules, incorporated into a back-to-the-basics campaign, and uploaded them to the online platform. They also created over 11 bundles of targeted education, ranging from 2 to 8 hours, specific to various specialties. The core modules were automatically assigned to units based on cost centers, aligning with annual education requirements. A Stroke Symposium in 2/2024, attended by over 100 participants, fulfilled annual stroke education requirements. Concurrently, the CNS worked with informatics to optimize EHR systems and update the Risk Factor activation process for individualization. Results: EHR optimizations reduced missed documentation and improved rounding efficiency. The streamlined education process and updated documentation requirements led to a reduction in time spent on documentation and clicks in the EHR. Compliance with stroke documentation improved, as evidenced by randomized chart audits, and stroke identification increased across the health system. Feedback from nurses and unit leadership highlighted the new content's relevance and engagement. Conclusions: The successful implementation of standardized stroke education and streamlined documentation has led to its expansion and continuous annual evaluation. The improvements have reduced documentation burdens, optimized the EHR, and allowed nurses to dedicate more time to patient care, enhancing patient outcomes through increased nurse confidence and competence in managing complex stroke cases.
Hegde S., Hernandez R., Salter A., Ray B.
Stroke scimago Q1 wos Q1
2025-02-01 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
Introduction: Tenecteplase (TNK) is now an accepted alternative to Alteplase (ALT) for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Hemorrhagic transformation (HT), a complication of IVT, is more frequent in acute hyperglycemia and diabetes (DM) and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. We previously reported better clinical outcomes in DM patients treated with TNK. In this study we explored if HT is associated with the observed less favorable outcomes in ALT-treated DM patients. Methods: In this 4-year retrospective cohort of AIS patients from 2 comprehensive stroke centers, DM was defined by known history, antidiabetic medication use, and admission glycated hemoglobin ≥6.5%. Time to IVT was grouped as ultra-early (0-90 min), early (91-180 min), and late (181-270 min). Peripheral blood indices, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) were used to assess acute immune response at admission and 24 hours. Non-parametric tests compared intergroup differences with statistical significance at p-value <0.05. Results: Three hundred and twelve patients (ALT, n=165 [DM, n=63; non-DM, n=102]; TNK, n=147 [DM, n=48; non-DM, n=99]) were included. The distribution was similar across groups of time to IVT between ALT and TNK (ultra-early [ALT, n=30%; TNK, n=36%]; early [ALT, n=51%; TNK, n=48%]; late [ALT, n=20%; TNK, n=17%], p=0.5). Baseline characteristics were similar between DM and non-DM within IVT groups. Rise in NLR at 24 hours was higher in non-DM ALT-treated patients compared to DM (109 [21, 262] vs. 45 [-14, 217], p=0.039), though other inflammatory markers were similar. HT was lower in non-DM compared to DM (17% vs. 33%, p=0.013) ALT-treated patients, though similar among TNK-treated patients. There were no differences in inflammatory markers or rates of HT in ultra-early or late periods. In the early period, non-DM TNK-treated patients experienced a higher rise in NLR (163 [60, 492] vs. 25 [-8, 168], p=0.015) and SII (134 [56, 447] vs. 28 [-8, 128], p=0.019) at 24 hours compared to DM, though HT rates were similar. In the early ALT cohort, DM experienced higher HT (33% vs. 12%, p=0.021). Conclusions: There was a higher rate of HT in ALT-treated DM patients compared to non-DM when administered at 91-180 min. This difference was not seen in ultra-early or late ALT administration or with TNK. Larger studies will need to validate these findings and clarify the role of early inflammation in mediating HT.
Kilani K., Morgan-Downing C., Yu A., Villareal B., Mall L., Steiner N., De Sisto T., Nour M.
Stroke scimago Q1 wos Q1
2025-02-01 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
Background: Stroke centers across the country followadhere to established best practice timeframes for stroke care delivery, such as door-to-doctor, door-to-CT, and door-to-needle times. Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) represent offer a novel approach to stroke care, and there are currently no established, agreed upon, standards for time metric goals. This study is aimedaims at to establishing MSU time metrics and implementing strategies to improve the efficiency of prehospital stroke care. Methods: We analyzed data from 289 patients admitted to the MSU between the years of 2017-2023. Key metrics were identified and analyzed, including alarm-to-dispatch time, on-scene-to-MSU evaluation time, admission-to-lab time, admission-to-CT non-contrast start time, CT non-contrast end-to-interpretation time, admission-to-thrombolysis/hemorrhage reversal/antihypertensive treatment time, and on-scene duration. From these metrics, goal times were established for the MSU program. These goals were shared with the MSU staff, who identified modifiable and non-modifiable factors affecting each metric. The team implemented action items to improve the metrics. A debriefing form was introduced, enabling staff to review metrics post-care, document whether goal times were met, and identify barriers and successes. Monthly reviews were conducted to monitor progress and refine practices. Results: Between January-July 2024, 31 MSU patients were treated, and the established metrics were analyzed and evaluated. Notable improvements were observed in five key areas: Alarm-to-dispatch time improved by 54% (.45 mins), on-scene-to-evaluation time improved by 48% (1.54 mins), admission-to-lab time improved by 23% (2.84 mins), admission-to-CT non-contrast start time improved by 44% (3.94 mins), on-scene duration improved by 13% (6.16 mins). These improvements highlight the potential for significant enhancement in time-sensitive stroke care delivery through the active implementation of quality improvement action plans by the MSU team. Conclusions: Setting and adhering to goal time metrics similar to those practiced in hospital-based stroke centers can greatly enhance the performance and care delivery of MSUs. These goal times offer measurable benchmarks to evaluate team performance, allowing for modifications in practice that can further reduce care delivery times. Implementing such improvements is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes in the prehospital stroke care setting.
Rook J.M., Lee L.K., Wagner J.P., Sullins V.F., Lee S.L., Shekherdimian S., DeUgarte D.A., Dichter C.E., Jen H.C.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery scimago Q1 wos Q2
2025-02-01 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
BackgroundThe Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum is associated with prolonged hospitalizations due to pain. We evaluated implementation of intercostal nerve cryoablation and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols on outcomes of Nuss procedures performed over six years at a single institution.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent Nuss procedure from 10/2017 to 09/2023. Patients received epidurals prior to 06/2019, cryoablation from 06/2019 to 07/2021, and ERAS with cryoablation and intraoperative methadone administration after 07/2021. We used multivariable linear regression to evaluate length of stay (LOS), inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and discharge opioids. We assessed the balancing measures of operative time, postoperative pain scores, and complications.ResultsWe identified 62 patients; 15 who received epidurals, 18 cryoablation, and 29 cryoablation with ERAS. Cryoablation was associated with a 62.3% (p < 0.001) decrease in length of stay, an 86.6% (p < 0.001) decrease in inpatient MMEs, and a 72.9% (p < 0.001) decrease in discharge opioids. Cryoablation was additionally associated with 24.5% (p = 0.02) longer operative times and 46.4% (p = 0.04) higher postoperative day one pain scores. Subsequent implementation of an ERAS protocol was associated with a further 82.8% (p = 0.04) decrease in discharge opioids and a 25.0% (p = 0.04) decrease in postoperative day one pain scores.ConclusionsOver six years of quality improvement efforts, we found the implementation of cryoablation and ERAS protocols to be associated with a significant decrease in length of stay and opioid exposures. Protocolized pain management and cryoablation may work synergistically to improve outcomes without compromising patient experience.Level of EvidenceLevel III – Retrospective comparative study.
Vicente J., Wooley R.
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation scimago Q2 wos Q3
2025-01-30 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
Clinical Scenario: Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal complaint. The most common type of shoulder pain is subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). The concept of regional interdependence demonstrates that body regions are interrelated, affecting how they function. Previous studies have reported the influence of the thoracic spine on the shoulder. Clinical Question: Does adding thoracic spine manipulation or mobilization to exercise in adults with SIS improve shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain, and disability? Summary of Key Findings: The literature was searched for level 2 evidence or higher that examined the effects of the addition of thoracic mobilization or manipulation to exercises in shoulder ROM, pain, and disability in SIS. Twenty articles related to the clinical question, but only 3 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two studies reported that the combination of thoracic mobilization or manipulation and exercises resulted in more significant improvements in shoulder ROM, pain, and disability compared to exercises alone. One study concluded that the combination of thoracic or shoulder mobilization to exercises was superior to ultrasound or exercises alone. Clinical Bottom Line: There is moderate evidence to support the addition of thoracic manipulation or mobilization to exercise in treating SIS to improve shoulder ROM, pain, and disability. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B evidence supports a multimodal approach using the combination of thoracic mobilization or manipulation and exercises in adults with SIS.
Yamagami S., Mori S., Sato T., Kondo H., Tamura T.
Journal of Arrhythmia scimago Q2 wos Q2 Open Access
2025-01-23 citations by CoLab: 0 PDF
McWhirter R., Holly T., Ayad I.A., Moore J.P., Biniwale R., Rahman S.
A&A practice scimago Q4 wos Q4
2025-01-20 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
Management of refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with implantable implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) presents a therapeutic challenge. We present a case of pediatric refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT)/Torsade de Pointe managed effectively with bilateral stellate ganglion block (SGB) with a long-acting local anesthetic for 18 days as a bridge to more definitive surgical management.
Iwanaga J., Kim H., Akita K., Logan B.M., Hutchings R.T., Ottone N., Nonaka Y., Anand M., Burns D., Singh V., Peris‐Celda M., Martinez‐Soriano F., Apaydin N., Hanna A., Yoshioka N., et. al.
Clinical Anatomy scimago Q1 wos Q1
2025-01-04 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
ABSTRACTNowadays, consent to use donor bodies for medical education and research is obtained from the body donors and their families before the donation. Recently, the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) published guidelines that could restrict the appearance of cadaveric images in commercial anatomical resources such as textbooks and other educational products. These guidelines state that the donor must expressly consent to using such images for this purpose. Cadaveric photos and drawings made from dissections of cadavers have been used in anatomy textbooks and atlases for hundreds of years. They are invaluable for anatomy students and clinical/surgical practitioners. The IFAA guidelines should not restrict the use of those older books; to do so would infringe the rights of those seeking knowledge from these resources. As the images in such textbooks and atlases are anonymized and are used for teaching and research, and the donors and their families are informed about this before the donation, we believe no additional consent is needed. It is impossible to separate educational from “commercial” usage entirely in any situation, e.g., publications from publishers and the use of cadavers in medical schools. Therefore, our best efforts to avoid unethical use of cadaveric images by following traditional consent processes are still needed so that more people will reap the benefits from them. As senior textbook/atlas authors/editors from over 10 countries, we believe that using cadaveric images in anatomy textbooks is appropriate, and no additional consent should be necessary. Such usage falls within the good faith of professionals using these invaluable gifts.
Krishna M., Spartz E.J., Maas L., Cusumano V., Sharma S., Limketkai B., Parian A.
Digestive Diseases and Sciences scimago Q1 wos Q2
2025-01-04 citations by CoLab: 0 Abstract  
The armamentarium of medical therapies to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to grow, which has expanded treatment options, particularly after first biologic failure. Currently, there are limited studies investigating the predictive value of first biologic primary non-response (PNR) on subsequent biologic success. Our objective was to determine if PNR to the first biologic for IBD is predictive of response to subsequent biologic therapy. A multicenter retrospective chart review study was performed with patients with IBD that received two or more biologics. PNR was defined as no clinical or symptomatic improvement after at least six weeks of treatment leading to cessation of drug. Patients who stopped their first biologic due to adverse side effects were classified in the intolerance group. Patients with initial significant response to biologic followed by a loss of response were classified as secondary loss of response (SLOR). Data analysis was performed with Python and Excel. Of the 249 patients that met inclusion criteria, there were 87 patients with PNR, 96 patients with SLOR, and 66 patients with intolerance to their first biologic exposure. Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC: 41.3%, p = 0.0083) and IBD-unclassified (IC: 56.3%, p = 0.0099) were found to have a significantly higher rate of primary non-response compared to patients with Crohn’s disease (CD: 25.0%). Patients on adalimumab for their first biologic had a significantly (p = 0.0014) higher rate of PNR (42.7%, UC: 50.0%, CD: 32.7%) compared to those on infliximab (23.0%, UC: 31.0%, CD: 12.1%). Patients with PNR did not have a higher rate of second biologic nonresponse when compared to patients who had SLOR or intolerance to their first biologic. Univariate analyses demonstrated no difference in rates of response to second biologic when switching intra-class or out-of-class. Ulcerative colitis and IBDU have higher rates of PNR compared to Crohn’s disease, but still have high response rates to second biologic agents. Adalimumab may be a suboptimal initial biologic given its higher PNR rate compared to infliximab. Our results support that there is an equally likely chance of response to second biologic after first biologic PNR. Subanalyses evaluating intraclass and out-of-class medication switching showed similar success.

Since 1969

Total publications
769
Total citations
12853
Citations per publication
16.71
Average publications per year
13.73
Average authors per publication
9.66
h-index
56
Metrics description

Top-30

Fields of science

20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 148, 19.25%
General Medicine, 111, 14.43%
Oncology, 96, 12.48%
Physiology (medical), 69, 8.97%
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, 48, 6.24%
Cancer Research, 44, 5.72%
Health Policy, 43, 5.59%
Surgery, 35, 4.55%
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 34, 4.42%
Infectious Diseases, 33, 4.29%
Epidemiology, 26, 3.38%
Immunology, 24, 3.12%
Immunology and Allergy, 21, 2.73%
Neurology (clinical), 21, 2.73%
General Nursing, 21, 2.73%
Leadership and Management, 21, 2.73%
Microbiology (medical), 19, 2.47%
Hematology, 19, 2.47%
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 19, 2.47%
Gastroenterology, 17, 2.21%
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 17, 2.21%
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 16, 2.08%
Health Informatics, 14, 1.82%
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 13, 1.69%
Cell Biology, 13, 1.69%
Psychiatry and Mental health, 13, 1.69%
Urology, 13, 1.69%
Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 13, 1.69%
Biochemistry, 12, 1.56%
Multidisciplinary, 12, 1.56%
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
5
10
15
20
25
30
35

Publishers

50
100
150
200
250
50
100
150
200
250

With other organizations

50
100
150
200
250
50
100
150
200
250

With foreign organizations

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2
4
6
8
10
12
14

With other countries

10
20
30
40
50
60
Canada, 59, 7.67%
United Kingdom, 51, 6.63%
Italy, 29, 3.77%
Germany, 28, 3.64%
France, 28, 3.64%
Netherlands, 28, 3.64%
Japan, 27, 3.51%
China, 21, 2.73%
Australia, 19, 2.47%
India, 14, 1.82%
Panama, 14, 1.82%
Spain, 13, 1.69%
Belgium, 10, 1.3%
Brazil, 10, 1.3%
Czech Republic, 10, 1.3%
Denmark, 9, 1.17%
Republic of Korea, 9, 1.17%
Switzerland, 8, 1.04%
Colombia, 7, 0.91%
Mexico, 7, 0.91%
Hungary, 6, 0.78%
New Zealand, 6, 0.78%
Norway, 5, 0.65%
Austria, 4, 0.52%
Lebanon, 4, 0.52%
Poland, 4, 0.52%
Sweden, 4, 0.52%
South Africa, 4, 0.52%
Russia, 3, 0.39%
10
20
30
40
50
60
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated daily.
  • Publications published earlier than 1969 are ignored in the statistics.
  • The horizontal charts show the 30 top positions.
  • Journals quartiles values are relevant at the moment.