Cheremisin, Alexey N
PhD in Engineering, Lecturer
🥼
🥼
Alexey can become your supervisor
If you would like to work under his/her guidance, please write a message or contact him/her on social media.
Authorization required.
Please confirm your email.
Thanks for signing up! Before getting started, could you verify your email address by clicking on the link we just emailed to you? If you didn't receive the email, we will gladly send you another.
🤝
🤝
Alexey is looking for opportunities for scientific collaboration
If you would like to do joint research with him/her, write a message or contact him/her on social media.
Authorization required.
Please confirm your email.
Thanks for signing up! Before getting started, could you verify your email address by clicking on the link we just emailed to you? If you didn't receive the email, we will gladly send you another.
Publications
148
Citations
1 583
h-index
24
Education
Lavrentyev Institute of Hydrodynamics SB RAS
2006 — 2010,
Postgraduate
Novosibirsk State University
1999 — 2003,
Bachelor, Faculty of Physics
- 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019 (1)
- ACS Omega (1)
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering (1)
- Advances in Geosciences (2)
- All Days (3)
- Applied Sciences (Switzerland) (1)
- Applied Thermal Engineering (2)
- Catalysts (1)
- Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification (1)
- Chemical Engineering Science (1)
- Chemical Physics (1)
- Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils (3)
- Chimica Techno Acta (1)
- Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects (2)
- Day 1 Mon, October 15, 2018 (1)
- Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019 (2)
- Day 4 Thu, June 06, 2019 (1)
- Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023 (1)
- E3S Web of Conferences (1)
- EAGE/SPE Workshop on Shale Science 2019 (3)
- Earth Science Informatics (1)
- Energies (16)
- Energy & Fuels (3)
- Energy Conversion and Management (1)
- Environmental Science & Technology (1)
- Fuel (2)
- Gas Science and Engineering (1)
- Geoenergy Science and Engineering (4)
- Geomodel 2019 (1)
- Georesursy (1)
- Geosciences (Switzerland) (1)
- Heliyon (1)
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (1)
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (1)
- International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM (2)
- IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (1)
- Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth (1)
- Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics (1)
- Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics (1)
- Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (1)
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1)
- Journal of Molecular Liquids (5)
- Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering (9)
- Journal of Surface Investigation (1)
- Journal of Surfactants and Detergents (1)
- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering (1)
- MATEC Web of Conferences (1)
- Minerals (1)
- Moscow University Geology Bulletin (1)
- Neftyanoe khozyaystvo - Oil Industry (8)
- New Journal of Chemistry (1)
- Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment (1)
- Petroleum Chemistry (1)
- Petroleum Science (1)
- Petroleum Science and Technology (2)
- Proceedings (4)
- Russian Journal of geophysical technologies (1)
- Scientific Reports (7)
- SPE Journal (1)
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering (2)
- Transport in Porous Media (1)
- Физика земли (1)
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Askarova A., Alekhina T., Zolfaghari S.M., Popov E., Afanasev P., Mukhametdinova A., Hosseinpour M., Soltani M., Cheremisin A., Mukhina E.
Mukhametdinova A., Karamov T., Markovic S., Morkovkin A., Burukhin A., Popov E., Sun Z., Zhao R., Cheremisin A.
Laboratory modeling of in-situ combustion is crucial for understanding the potential success of field trials in thermal enhanced oil recovery and is a vital precursor to scaling the technology for field applications. The high combustion temperatures, reaching up to 480°C, induce significant petrophysical alterations of the rock, an often overlooked aspect in thermal EOR projects. Quantifying these changes is essential for potentially repurposing thermally treated, depleted reservoirs for CO2 storage. In this study, we depart from conventional combustion experiments that use crushed core, opting instead to analyze the thermal effects on reservoir properties of carbonate rocks using consolidated samples. This technique maintains the intrinsic porosity and permeability, revealing combustion's impact on porosity and mineralogical alterations, with a comparative analysis of these properties pre- and post-combustion. We characterize porosity and pore geometry evolution using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray micro-computed tomography, and low-temperature nitrogen adsorption. Mineral composition of the rock and grain-pore scale alterations are analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The analysis shows a significant increase in carbonate rocks' porosity, pore size and mineral alterations, and a transition from mixed-wet to a strongly water-wet state. Total porosity of rock samples increased in average for 15%–20%, and formation of new pores is registered at the scale of 1–30 μm size. High-temperature exposure results in the calcite and dolomite decomposition, calcite dissolution and formation of new minerals – anhydrite and fluorite. Increased microporosity and the shift to strongly water-wet rock state improve the prospects for capillary and residual CO2 trapping with greater capacity. Consequently, these findings highlight the importance of laboratory in-situ combustion modeling on consolidated rock over tests that use crushed core, and indicate that depleted combustion stimulated reservoirs may prove to be viable candidates for CO2 storage.
Bello A., Dorhjie D.B., Ivanova A., Cheremisin A.
Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) offers a viable solution to reduce the carbon footprint in the petroleum industry, and foam injection presents a promising method to achieve this while simultaneously increasing oil recovery. In this work, we studied the feasibility of CO2 foam for co-optimizing enhanced oil recovery and CO2 storage in a high-salinity carbonate formation. The simulated hydrodynamic model is a depleted formation containing 30% residual oil, with three mechanisms for CO2 storage: solubility, residual, and mineralization trapping mechanisms. The results showed that after 20 years, oil recovery during foam injection was 2.7 times higher than CO2 injection, and the CO2 stored during foam flooding was 38% higher than CO2 injection. Notably, foam injection also increased CO2 storage capacity by 2.6 times, indicating the potential to store around 2 gigatons of CO2 in the simulated model. This was attributed to the ability of foam to significantly reduce gas mobility and thus form isolated bubbles through its Jamin effect. Residual trapping was the dominant trapping mechanism, contributing to over 70% of the total CO2 trapped, attributed to the reduction in the dissolution of CO2 in brine due to the high salinity of the aqueous medium. CO2 mineralization was also studied, showing the least trapping efficiency and the dissolution trend of all the carbonate minerals. This study illustrates a novel CO2 utilization and storage technique in which CO2 is concurrently sequestered while enhancing oil recovery in a depleted oil reservoir by injecting CO2 as foam. The relevance of this study lies in its potential to provide a dual benefit of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and boosting oil production, offering a sustainable approach for the petroleum industry.
Bello A., Ivanova A., Bakulin D., Yunusov T., Cheremisin A.
Surfactants are crucial in chemical enhanced oil recovery, but high adsorption onto rocks reduces their efficiency and economic viability. Sacrificial agents, such as alkalis, nanoparticles, and polymers have been investigated to mitigate this issue but they in turn present drawbacks such as poor oil interaction, compatibility issues, pore plugging, and increased costs. Binary surfactant systems, due to their favorable potential synergistic interactions, are proposed as solutions for reducing surfactant adsorption. Static adsorption experiments were conducted to assess the effect of the binary surfactants on adsorption efficiency, and the impact of salinity on the adsorption process equilibrium was also studied. Five core flooding experiments under reservoir temperature (41 ∘C), reservoir pressure (21 MPa), and high salinity (23.4 wt.%) were conducted to evaluate dynamic adsorption. The surfactant concentrations in supernatant and effluent, after the adsorption process were determined via interfacial tension tests using a spinning drop method. The results showed a significant reduction in surfactant adsorption on carbonate rocks, from 9.99 mg/g-rock to 0.68 mg/g-rock for anionic surfactants and from 5.38 mg/g-rock to 0.19 mg/g-rock for zwitterionic surfactants, with corresponding dynamic reductions of 61% and 89%. Our results were further evidenced by the little to no changes in the differential pH curves in the adsorption process of the binary surfactant systems. This study presents a cost-effective approach for significantly reducing surfactant adsorption on carbonate rocks and aids in designing surfactant formulations for adsorption reduction in high-temperature, high-salinity carbonate reservoirs.
Mukhina E., Afanasev P., Mukhametdinova A., Alekhina T., Askarova A., Popov E., Cheremisin A.
Hydrogen has been proven as a promising energy resource for a clean and sustainable future. However, the complete replacement of conventional hydrocarbon energy sources poses a challenge due to their widespread industrial utilization. Despite the gradual depletion of petroleum and natural gas reserves, they continued to serve as primary energy sources for many decades. But what if we could repurpose these hydrocarbons? Currently, fossil fuels that are both non-renewable and environmentally unfriendly are directly used for energy generation. Instead, we could convert hydrocarbons into a significantly cleaner alternative – hydrogen. This process implies in situ hydrogen generation even before hydrocarbons are recovered from a reservoir without releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. In this context, we explore the conversion of methane into hydrogen in the gas reservoir with zero oil saturation via steam methane reforming initiated by in situ gas combustion. In the experimental model, different rock porous media were utilized and the process parameters such as temperature and the steam-to-methane ratio were varied. The outcome reveals a range of variations, each yielding different concentrations of hydrogen produced depending on these adjustable parameters. Our findings suggest the incredible potential for underground hydrogen generation in natural gas reservoirs. This approach holds great promise as a leading candidate for the foreseeable future, benefiting from the synergy of the fossil fuel industry and an innovative hydrogen production technology.
Zelentsov D.O., Petrova Y.Y., Egorova V.V., Povalyaev P.V., Frantsina E.V., Ivanova A.A., Cheremisin A.N., Sivkov A.A., Shanenkov I.I., Nassyrbayev A., Nikitin D.S.
Ti–O Magneli phases and carbon nanoparticles modified in sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions formed stable dispersions in water.
Bello A., Ivanova A., Bakulin D., Yunusov T., Rodionov A., Burukhin A., Cheremisin A.
AbstractA key factor affecting foam stability is the interaction of foam with oil in the reservoir. This work investigates how different types of oil influence the stability of foams generated with binary surfactant systems under a high salinity condition. Foam was generated with binary surfactant systems, one composed of a zwitterionic and a nonionic surfactant, and the other composed of an anionic and a nonionic surfactant. Our results showed that the binary surfactant foams investigated are more tolerant under high salinity conditions and in the presence of oil. This was visually observed in our microscopic analysis and was further attributed to an increase in apparent viscosity achieved with binary surfactant systems, compared to single surfactant foams. To understand the influence of oil on foam stability, we performed a mechanistic study to investigate how these oils interact with foams generated with binary surfactants, focusing on their applicability under high salinity conditions. The generation and stability of foam are linked to the ability of the surfactant system to solubilize oil molecules. Oil droplets that solubilize in the micelles appear to destabilize the foam. However, oils with higher molecular weights are too large to be solubilized in the micelles, hence the molecules will have less ability to be transported out of the foam, so oil seems to stabilize the foam. Finally, we conducted a multivariate analysis to identify the parameters that influenced foam stability in different oil types, using the experimental data from our work. The results showed that the oil molecular weight, interfacial tension between the foaming liquid and the oil, and the spreading coefficient are the most important variables for explaining the variation in the data. By performing a partial least square regression, a linear model was developed based on these most important variables, which can be used to predict foam stability for subsequent experiments under the same conditions as our work.
Dorhjie D.B., Cheremisin A.
Abstract
Hydrogen is poised to become one of the most promising alternative clean sources of energy for climate change mitigation. The development of a sustainable hydrogen economy depends on the global implementation of safe and economically feasible intersessional hydrogen storage and recovery. However, the current body of literature lacks comprehensive numerical characterization of the multiphase flow of hydrogen-brine and how geological parameters at the pore scale influence the multiphase flow. This study presents a pore network simulation of hydrogen-brine and cushion gas-brine relative permeabilities. Initially, the generated pore network model was validated against the characteristics of the core sample, such as porosity, permeability, and pore size distribution. In addition, the model was adapted to replicate the results of the drainage capillary pressure curves and relative permeability curves observed in the laboratory experiment. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to quantify the effects of fluid and rock properties on the relative permeabilities of the fluids. The results indicate that the capillary pressure and the relative permeability of the hydrogen and brine are sensitive to the distribution of the surface contact angle. The relative permeability of hydrogen phase decreases as the frequency of pores with stronger water-wet contact angle values increases. The relative permeability endpoint (residual saturation) was also significantly influenced by pore and throat shape, pore and throat size distribution, and pore connectivity. Simulations of different cushion gases revealed that the relative permeabilities of CH4 and N2 are similar to hydrogen. This research offers a comprehensive pore-scale prediction of the relative permeability of hydrogen and brine systems and presents the parameters and cushion gases to consider in the selection of geological storage sites for hydrogen storage.
Askarova A.G., Afanasev P.A., Popov E.Y., Cheremisin A.N., Malaniy S.E., Volkov D.A., Cheremisin A.N.
Abstract
There has been a growing trend in the energy sector toward hydrogen generation due to the market’s rising need for hydrogen. This change has led to a larger emphasis on creating methods and tools for subsurface hydrogen production from hydrocarbons. This research determines the features of the process of In-situ Hydrogen Generation (ISHG) and interprets the results of laboratory tests to build a scheme of kinetic reactions.
A combustion tube experiment of methane combustion in porous media was conducted to reproduce the process of hydrogen synthesis from methane under reservoir conditions (high pressure and temperatures) created by the In-situ Combustion (ISC) technology. Further numerical modelling allows validating the kinetic model typical for methane combustion in a pores medium, removing uncertainties and determining the favorable conditions for hydrogen generation (temperature, steam-methane ratio, injection rate).
During numerical simulation, good convergence of numerical simulation results with experimental data was obtained, namely the temperature profile, cumulative gas production, and molar concentrations of gas components such as H2, CH4, CO and CO2, as the main indicators of the kinetic model adaptation quality. The methane steam reforming and methane cracking reactions demonstrated the highest contribution to producing gases. The constructed kinetic model was history-matched to the experiment of the combustion tube to assess the advancement of the high-temperature front, the transformations occurring in a given zone of elevated temperatures and the adaptation of the curves of relative-phase characteristics for the subsequent assessment of the method’s effectiveness. The obtained kinetic model and relative permeability curves were used in field-scale modelling. The up-scaled field model considered a few development strategies using existing infrastructure to optimize the hydrogen generation yield.
This paper determines the features of the process of ISHG and interprets the laboratory test results to build a scheme of kinetic reactions. The obtained kinetic model was used further in a field-scale model to assess the feasibility of hydrogen generation using existing infrastructure.
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Fu C., Huang K., Chen H., Huang B., Zhang W.
Wu H., Yao Y., Duan J., Niu M., Chen D., Zi M.
Askarova A., Alekhina T., Zolfaghari S.M., Popov E., Afanasev P., Mukhametdinova A., Hosseinpour M., Soltani M., Cheremisin A., Mukhina E.





Shu Y., Liu B., Zhang H., Zhou A., Zhang S., Shi Z., Hu Z., Wang X.
Kan J., Yang J., Li Z., Xu Z., Li N., Chen G.
Gao Q., Jiang X., Wang Z., Yang Z., Trivedi J., Xu X., Mmbuji A.O., Patel V.


Nothing found, try to update filter.
Yuan C., Afanasev P., Askarova A., Popov E., Cheremisin A.
Askarova A., Alekhina T., Popov E., Afanasev P., Mukhametdinova A., Smirnov A., Cheremisin A., Mukhina E.
Mukhametdinova A., Karamov T., Markovic S., Morkovkin A., Burukhin A., Popov E., Sun Z., Zhao R., Cheremisin A.
Laboratory modeling of in-situ combustion is crucial for understanding the potential success of field trials in thermal enhanced oil recovery and is a vital precursor to scaling the technology for field applications. The high combustion temperatures, reaching up to 480°C, induce significant petrophysical alterations of the rock, an often overlooked aspect in thermal EOR projects. Quantifying these changes is essential for potentially repurposing thermally treated, depleted reservoirs for CO2 storage. In this study, we depart from conventional combustion experiments that use crushed core, opting instead to analyze the thermal effects on reservoir properties of carbonate rocks using consolidated samples. This technique maintains the intrinsic porosity and permeability, revealing combustion's impact on porosity and mineralogical alterations, with a comparative analysis of these properties pre- and post-combustion. We characterize porosity and pore geometry evolution using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray micro-computed tomography, and low-temperature nitrogen adsorption. Mineral composition of the rock and grain-pore scale alterations are analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The analysis shows a significant increase in carbonate rocks' porosity, pore size and mineral alterations, and a transition from mixed-wet to a strongly water-wet state. Total porosity of rock samples increased in average for 15%–20%, and formation of new pores is registered at the scale of 1–30 μm size. High-temperature exposure results in the calcite and dolomite decomposition, calcite dissolution and formation of new minerals – anhydrite and fluorite. Increased microporosity and the shift to strongly water-wet rock state improve the prospects for capillary and residual CO2 trapping with greater capacity. Consequently, these findings highlight the importance of laboratory in-situ combustion modeling on consolidated rock over tests that use crushed core, and indicate that depleted combustion stimulated reservoirs may prove to be viable candidates for CO2 storage.
Okere C.J., Sheng J.J.
The increasing demand for eco-friendly and renewable energy has positioned hydrogen as a viable solution for global energy and environmental challenges. In-situ combustion gasification of heavy oil reservoirs offers potential for large-scale hydrogen production, injecting steam and air (or alternative gases) to trigger complex chemical reactions leading to hydrogen and syngas generation. However, a research gap exists due to the lack of a comprehensive numerical model for accurately simulating hydrogen production under SARA-based (saturate, aromatic, resin, asphaltene) hydrocarbon characterization in experiments and field study. This study addresses the gap by investigating in-situ combustion gasification for hydrogen generation in heavy oil reservoirs. A novel model based on SARA characterization is proposed, showing fidelity with experimental and numerical results. Different injection strategies, like pure oxygen and CO2, impact hydrogen production. Oxygen injection yields less hydrogen than air injection, highlighting the importance of oxygen control. CO2 injection reduces hydrogen but aids carbon management. The oxygen to nitrogen ratio (61/39) demonstrates the highest hydrogen-to-syngas ratio. Practical implementation requires economic feasibility, operational practicality, safety, and environmental considerations. This study advances in-situ combustion gasification technology, facilitating efficient and sustainable hydrogen generation from heavy oil reservoirs.
Saadat Z., Farazmand M., Sameti M.
One of the major challenges in harnessing energy from renewable sources like wind and solar is their intermittent nature. Energy production from these sources can vary based on weather conditions and time of day, making it essential to store surplus energy for later use when there is a shortfall. Energy storage systems play a crucial role in addressing this intermittency issue and ensuring a stable and reliable energy supply. Green hydrogen, sourced from renewables, emerges as a promising solution to meet the rising demand for sustainable energy, addressing the depletion of fossil fuels and environmental crises. In the present study, underground hydrogen storage in various geological formations (aquifers, depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, salt caverns) is examined, emphasizing the need for a detailed geological analysis and addressing potential hazards. The paper discusses challenges associated with underground hydrogen storage, including the requirement for extensive studies to understand hydrogen interactions with microorganisms. It underscores the importance of the issue, with a focus on reviewing the the various past and present hydrogen storage projects and sites, as well as reviewing the modeling studies in this field. The paper also emphasizes the importance of incorporating hybrid energy systems into hydrogen storage to overcome limitations associated with standalone hydrogen storage systems. It further explores the past and future integrations of underground storage of green hydrogen within this dynamic energy landscape.
Ikpeka P., Alozieuwa E., Duru U.I., Ugwu J.
Energy transition is a key driver to combat climate change and achieve zero carbon future. Sustainable and cost-effective hydrogen production will provide valuable addition to the renewable energy mix and help minimize greenhouse gas emissions. This study investigates the performance of in-situ hydrogen production (IHP) process, using a full-field compositional model as a precursor to experimental validation The reservoir model was simulated as one geological unit with a single point uniform porosity value of 0.13 and a five-point connection type between cell to minimize computational cost. Twenty-one hydrogen forming reactions were modelled based on the reservoir fluid composition selected for this study. The thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for the reactions were obtained from published experiments due to the absence of experimental data specific to the reservoir. A total of fifty-four simulation runs were conducted using CMG STARS software for 5478 days and cumulative hydrogen produced for each run was recorded. Results generated were then used to build a proxy model using Box-Behnken design of experiment method and Support Vector Machine with RBF kernel. To ascertain accuracy of the proxy models, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted on the variables. The average absolute percentage error between the proxy model and numerical simulation was calculated to be 10.82%. Optimization of the proxy model was performed using genetic algorithm to maximize cumulative hydrogen produced. Based on this optimized model, the influence of porosity, permeability, well location, injection rate, and injection pressure were studied. Key results from this study reveals that lower permeability and porosity reservoirs supports more hydrogen yield, injection pressure had a negligible effect on hydrogen yield, and increase in oxygen injection rate corelated strongly with hydrogen production until a threshold value beyond which hydrogen yield decreased. The framework developed in the study could be used as tool to assess candidate reservoirs for in-situ hydrogen production.
Mukhina E., Afanasev P., Mukhametdinova A., Alekhina T., Askarova A., Popov E., Cheremisin A.
Hydrogen has been proven as a promising energy resource for a clean and sustainable future. However, the complete replacement of conventional hydrocarbon energy sources poses a challenge due to their widespread industrial utilization. Despite the gradual depletion of petroleum and natural gas reserves, they continued to serve as primary energy sources for many decades. But what if we could repurpose these hydrocarbons? Currently, fossil fuels that are both non-renewable and environmentally unfriendly are directly used for energy generation. Instead, we could convert hydrocarbons into a significantly cleaner alternative – hydrogen. This process implies in situ hydrogen generation even before hydrocarbons are recovered from a reservoir without releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. In this context, we explore the conversion of methane into hydrogen in the gas reservoir with zero oil saturation via steam methane reforming initiated by in situ gas combustion. In the experimental model, different rock porous media were utilized and the process parameters such as temperature and the steam-to-methane ratio were varied. The outcome reveals a range of variations, each yielding different concentrations of hydrogen produced depending on these adjustable parameters. Our findings suggest the incredible potential for underground hydrogen generation in natural gas reservoirs. This approach holds great promise as a leading candidate for the foreseeable future, benefiting from the synergy of the fossil fuel industry and an innovative hydrogen production technology.
Hosseinpour M., Fakhroleslam M., Djimasbe R., Al-Muntaser A.A., Suwaid M.A., Khelil I., Varfolomeev M.A., Nurgaliev D.K.
Kovalskii A.M., Manakhov A.M., Afanasev P.A., Popov Z.I., Matveev A.T., Al-Qasim A.S.
The development of hydrogen energy is capable of solving a number of important issues that modern society is facing, including global warming and various environmental impacts. Currently, there is an intensive search for natural sources of hydrogen as well as low-carbon techniques for mass production of hydrogen from natural gas, associated petroleum gas, and water. In parallel, efforts to develop technologies for the subsequent management of hydrogen are underway, and the creation of its safe and efficient storage is one of the highest priority goals. For the transportation and storage of hydrogen today, a number of solutions are offered, each of which has both positive and negative aspects. The boron nitride family of materials with high thermal and chemical stability, variability of morphologies, and flexibility of structure has been considered as a candidate for efficient hydrogen storage. This review offers to familiarize readers with the progress in the research and application of hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), as well as BN-based materials in comparison with other materials, as promising hydrogen storage. Experimental and theoretical data obtained for different morphologies and internal structures were reviewed in relevance to the material`s sorption capacity with respect to hydrogen. Various approaches to improve the efficiency of hydrogen storage were analyzed, and the highest storage capabilities published were mentioned. Thus, BN-based materials are very promising as hydrogen storage, even for an automotive application, but the development of new mass production technologies should be carried out.
Manafzadeh P., Habibiyan H., Hosseinpour M., Talebi S.
The first part of the current study highlights the importance of developing a clean hydrogen supply chain (CHSC) in Iran to enhance energy security and contribute to global efforts towards sustainable energy transition. Depending on whether the focus is on domestic consumption or export of hydrogen, the study provides valuable insights into the prioritization of CHSC development pathways via multi-criteria decision-making tools (AHP, AHOP-TOPSIS, and AHP-VIKOR). The results show that for domestic hydrogen consumption (internal scenario), the best path of the supply chain includes blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming coupled with carbon capture and storage, H2-carriers (ammonia and methanol), natural gas grid for transportation and distribution, and industry sector as the end user. In the external scenario, however, the best path of the CHSC consists of green hydrogen production based on solar energy, and the other parts of the path include liquid hydrogen as the storage method, ship as the distribution and transportation, and industrial sector as the end user. By identifying the most suitable methods and technologies for each stage of the supply chain, this paper offers a comprehensive analysis that can guide decision-making in CHSC development.
Sarkar M., Bhattacharya P., Chatterjee H., Sarkar S., Mandal B., Biswas S., Ghosh S.K., De S.
Substoichiometric titanium oxides i.e. Magneli phase (MP) TiOx are attractive due to their conductive nature. However, their synthesis is challenging. In this work, Anisotropic MP- Ti4O7 nanoparticles and Au doped nanocomposites were synthesized using β- cyclodextrin as template. The MP nanomaterials were 20-30 nm in size. The synthesis conditions were mild. These MP- TiOx nanomaterials show efficient charge separation upon light excitation i.e. they (i) act as efficient photocatalysts; (ii) they can be sensitized by a fluorescent dye; (iii) finite element method (FEM) simulations indicate substantial interfacial plasmonic charge generation at the metal-semiconductor interface in the doped nanocomposites.
Bello A., Ivanova A., Bakulin D., Yunusov T., Rodionov A., Burukhin A., Cheremisin A.
AbstractA key factor affecting foam stability is the interaction of foam with oil in the reservoir. This work investigates how different types of oil influence the stability of foams generated with binary surfactant systems under a high salinity condition. Foam was generated with binary surfactant systems, one composed of a zwitterionic and a nonionic surfactant, and the other composed of an anionic and a nonionic surfactant. Our results showed that the binary surfactant foams investigated are more tolerant under high salinity conditions and in the presence of oil. This was visually observed in our microscopic analysis and was further attributed to an increase in apparent viscosity achieved with binary surfactant systems, compared to single surfactant foams. To understand the influence of oil on foam stability, we performed a mechanistic study to investigate how these oils interact with foams generated with binary surfactants, focusing on their applicability under high salinity conditions. The generation and stability of foam are linked to the ability of the surfactant system to solubilize oil molecules. Oil droplets that solubilize in the micelles appear to destabilize the foam. However, oils with higher molecular weights are too large to be solubilized in the micelles, hence the molecules will have less ability to be transported out of the foam, so oil seems to stabilize the foam. Finally, we conducted a multivariate analysis to identify the parameters that influenced foam stability in different oil types, using the experimental data from our work. The results showed that the oil molecular weight, interfacial tension between the foaming liquid and the oil, and the spreading coefficient are the most important variables for explaining the variation in the data. By performing a partial least square regression, a linear model was developed based on these most important variables, which can be used to predict foam stability for subsequent experiments under the same conditions as our work.
Dorhjie D.B., Cheremisin A.
Abstract
Hydrogen is poised to become one of the most promising alternative clean sources of energy for climate change mitigation. The development of a sustainable hydrogen economy depends on the global implementation of safe and economically feasible intersessional hydrogen storage and recovery. However, the current body of literature lacks comprehensive numerical characterization of the multiphase flow of hydrogen-brine and how geological parameters at the pore scale influence the multiphase flow. This study presents a pore network simulation of hydrogen-brine and cushion gas-brine relative permeabilities. Initially, the generated pore network model was validated against the characteristics of the core sample, such as porosity, permeability, and pore size distribution. In addition, the model was adapted to replicate the results of the drainage capillary pressure curves and relative permeability curves observed in the laboratory experiment. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to quantify the effects of fluid and rock properties on the relative permeabilities of the fluids. The results indicate that the capillary pressure and the relative permeability of the hydrogen and brine are sensitive to the distribution of the surface contact angle. The relative permeability of hydrogen phase decreases as the frequency of pores with stronger water-wet contact angle values increases. The relative permeability endpoint (residual saturation) was also significantly influenced by pore and throat shape, pore and throat size distribution, and pore connectivity. Simulations of different cushion gases revealed that the relative permeabilities of CH4 and N2 are similar to hydrogen. This research offers a comprehensive pore-scale prediction of the relative permeability of hydrogen and brine systems and presents the parameters and cushion gases to consider in the selection of geological storage sites for hydrogen storage.
Total publications
148
Total citations
1583
Citations per publication
10.7
Average publications per year
7.05
Average coauthors
5.24
Publications years
2005-2025 (21 years)
h-index
24
i10-index
43
m-index
1.14
o-index
60
g-index
35
w-index
5
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
i10-index
The number of the author's publications that received at least 10 links each.
m-index
The researcher's m-index is numerically equal to the ratio of his h-index to the number of years that have passed since the first publication.
o-index
The geometric mean of the h-index and the number of citations of the most cited article of the scientist.
g-index
For a given set of articles, sorted in descending order of the number of citations that these articles received, the g-index is the largest number such that the g most cited articles received (in total) at least g2 citations.
w-index
If w articles of a researcher have at least 10w citations each and other publications are less than 10(w+1) citations, then the researcher's w-index is equal to w.
Top-100
Fields of science
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
|
Energy Engineering and Power Technology, 39, 26.35%
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
39 publications, 26.35%
|
Fuel Technology
|
Fuel Technology, 30, 20.27%
Fuel Technology
30 publications, 20.27%
|
General Chemical Engineering
|
General Chemical Engineering, 19, 12.84%
General Chemical Engineering
19 publications, 12.84%
|
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
|
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 18, 12.16%
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
18 publications, 12.16%
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 16, 10.81%
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
16 publications, 10.81%
|
Control and Optimization
|
Control and Optimization, 16, 10.81%
Control and Optimization
16 publications, 10.81%
|
Engineering (miscellaneous)
|
Engineering (miscellaneous), 16, 10.81%
Engineering (miscellaneous)
16 publications, 10.81%
|
Energy (miscellaneous)
|
Energy (miscellaneous), 16, 10.81%
Energy (miscellaneous)
16 publications, 10.81%
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 14, 9.46%
General Chemistry
14 publications, 9.46%
|
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
|
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology, 12, 8.11%
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
12 publications, 8.11%
|
Building and Construction
|
Building and Construction, 10, 6.76%
Building and Construction
10 publications, 6.76%
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 7, 4.73%
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
7 publications, 4.73%
|
Materials Chemistry
|
Materials Chemistry, 4, 2.7%
Materials Chemistry
4 publications, 2.7%
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 4, 2.7%
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
4 publications, 2.7%
|
General Medicine
|
General Medicine, 4, 2.7%
General Medicine
4 publications, 2.7%
|
Multidisciplinary
|
Multidisciplinary, 4, 2.7%
Multidisciplinary
4 publications, 2.7%
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 4, 2.7%
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
4 publications, 2.7%
|
Condensed Matter Physics
|
Condensed Matter Physics, 4, 2.7%
Condensed Matter Physics
4 publications, 2.7%
|
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
|
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 4, 2.7%
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
4 publications, 2.7%
|
Geology
|
Geology, 4, 2.7%
Geology
4 publications, 2.7%
|
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
|
General Earth and Planetary Sciences, 4, 2.7%
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
4 publications, 2.7%
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 3, 2.03%
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
3 publications, 2.03%
|
Spectroscopy
|
Spectroscopy, 3, 2.03%
Spectroscopy
3 publications, 2.03%
|
Colloid and Surface Chemistry
|
Colloid and Surface Chemistry, 3, 2.03%
Colloid and Surface Chemistry
3 publications, 2.03%
|
Catalysis
|
Catalysis, 2, 1.35%
Catalysis
2 publications, 1.35%
|
Process Chemistry and Technology
|
Process Chemistry and Technology, 2, 1.35%
Process Chemistry and Technology
2 publications, 1.35%
|
General Materials Science
|
General Materials Science, 2, 1.35%
General Materials Science
2 publications, 1.35%
|
Instrumentation
|
Instrumentation, 2, 1.35%
Instrumentation
2 publications, 1.35%
|
Mechanical Engineering
|
Mechanical Engineering, 2, 1.35%
Mechanical Engineering
2 publications, 1.35%
|
General Engineering
|
General Engineering, 2, 1.35%
General Engineering
2 publications, 1.35%
|
Environmental Chemistry
|
Environmental Chemistry, 2, 1.35%
Environmental Chemistry
2 publications, 1.35%
|
Geochemistry and Petrology
|
Geochemistry and Petrology, 2, 1.35%
Geochemistry and Petrology
2 publications, 1.35%
|
General Environmental Science
|
General Environmental Science, 2, 1.35%
General Environmental Science
2 publications, 1.35%
|
Geophysics
|
Geophysics, 2, 1.35%
Geophysics
2 publications, 1.35%
|
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
|
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, 2, 1.35%
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
2 publications, 1.35%
|
Organic Chemistry
|
Organic Chemistry, 1, 0.68%
Organic Chemistry
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Computer Science Applications
|
Computer Science Applications, 1, 0.68%
Computer Science Applications
1 publication, 0.68%
|
General Physics and Astronomy
|
General Physics and Astronomy, 1, 0.68%
General Physics and Astronomy
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Biomaterials
|
Biomaterials, 1, 0.68%
Biomaterials
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Mechanics of Materials
|
Mechanics of Materials, 1, 0.68%
Mechanics of Materials
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
|
Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1, 0.68%
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
|
Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 1, 0.68%
Nuclear Energy and Engineering
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Applied Mathematics
|
Applied Mathematics, 1, 0.68%
Applied Mathematics
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Space and Planetary Science
|
Space and Planetary Science, 1, 0.68%
Space and Planetary Science
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
|
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), 1, 0.68%
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Show all (15 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Journals
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
Energies
16 publications, 10.81%
|
|
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
9 publications, 6.08%
|
|
Neftyanoe khozyaystvo - Oil Industry
8 publications, 5.41%
|
|
Scientific Reports
7 publications, 4.73%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
5 publications, 3.38%
|
|
Proceedings
4 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
4 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils
3 publications, 2.03%
|
|
Energy & Fuels
3 publications, 2.03%
|
|
Fuel
3 publications, 2.03%
|
|
EAGE/SPE Workshop on Shale Science 2019
3 publications, 2.03%
|
|
All Days
3 publications, 2.03%
|
|
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Petroleum Science and Technology
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Advances in Geosciences
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Applied Thermal Engineering
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Surface Investigation
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Catalysts
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Petroleum Science
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
MATEC Web of Conferences
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Georesursy
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Energy Conversion and Management
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Earth Science Informatics
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Chemical Physics
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Geosciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Moscow University Geology Bulletin
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
SPE Journal
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Science
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Minerals
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
ACS Omega
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Petroleum Chemistry
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Heliyon
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Transport in Porous Media
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Chimica Techno Acta
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Физика земли
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Gas Science and Engineering
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Geomodel 2019
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Day 4 Thu, June 06, 2019
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Day 1 Mon, October 15, 2018
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Russian Journal of geophysical technologies
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Show all (32 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
Journal not defined
|
Journal not defined, 141, 8.67%
Journal not defined
141 citations, 8.67%
|
Energy & Fuels
130 citations, 7.99%
|
|
Energies
100 citations, 6.15%
|
|
Fuel
86 citations, 5.29%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
79 citations, 4.86%
|
|
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
59 citations, 3.63%
|
|
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
52 citations, 3.2%
|
|
Scientific Reports
39 citations, 2.4%
|
|
Energy
36 citations, 2.21%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
34 citations, 2.09%
|
|
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
30 citations, 1.84%
|
|
Applied Energy
27 citations, 1.66%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
25 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
25 citations, 1.54%
|
|
ACS Omega
25 citations, 1.54%
|
|
SPE Journal
24 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
21 citations, 1.29%
|
|
Heliyon
20 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Petroleum Science
19 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Processes
18 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
17 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
16 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Geosciences (Switzerland)
14 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Gas Science and Engineering
13 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Petroleum Science and Technology
11 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Applied Thermal Engineering
11 citations, 0.68%
|
|
SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering
11 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Physics of Fluids
10 citations, 0.61%
|
|
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
10 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
10 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
9 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Energy Conversion and Management
9 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
9 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
9 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Petroleum Research
9 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Georesursy
8 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
8 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Renewable Energy
7 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Marine and Petroleum Geology
7 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Petroleum Chemistry
7 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
7 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Earth-Science Reviews
7 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
RSC Advances
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Petroleum
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Science
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Separation and Purification Technology
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Нефтехимия
6 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Surface Investigation
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Molecules
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Oil and Gas Science and Technology
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Results in Engineering
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Energy Research
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Chemical Society Reviews
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Catalysts
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Petroleum Exploration and Development
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Powder Technology
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Thermochimica Acta
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Minerals
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Earth Science
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Langmuir
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Energy Reports
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Natural Resources Research
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Fluid Phase Equilibria
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Advances in Water Resources
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Polymers
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sustainable Energy and Fuels
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Transport in Porous Media
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Hazardous Materials
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Communications Earth & Environment
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Next Research
3 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Surfaces and Interfaces
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Chemical Papers
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AICHE Journal
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Developments in Petroleum Science
2 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishers
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
Elsevier
36 publications, 24.32%
|
|
MDPI
24 publications, 16.22%
|
|
Springer Nature
14 publications, 9.46%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
11 publications, 7.43%
|
|
Oil Industry Corporation
8 publications, 5.41%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
7 publications, 4.73%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
5 publications, 3.38%
|
|
EAGE Publications bv
5 publications, 3.38%
|
|
Wiley
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
EDP Sciences
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
SGEM World Science
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Copernicus
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Georesursy LLC
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics (SB RAS)
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Organizations from articles
20
40
60
80
100
|
|
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
100 publications, 67.57%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 41, 27.7%
Organization not defined
41 publications, 27.7%
|
Curtin University
14 publications, 9.46%
|
|
University of Calgary
11 publications, 7.43%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
5 publications, 3.38%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
5 publications, 3.38%
|
|
Heriot-Watt University
5 publications, 3.38%
|
|
University of Tyumen
4 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Institute of Nanotechnology of Microelectronics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 2.03%
|
|
Industrial University of Tyumen
3 publications, 2.03%
|
|
National University of Oil and Gas «Gubkin University»
3 publications, 2.03%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
3 publications, 2.03%
|
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Lavrentyev Institute of Hydrodynamics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Surgut State University
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Ufa University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Novosibirsk State University
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Udmurt federal research center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Shiraz University
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
University of Lausanne
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Yangtze University
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Northeast Petroleum University
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Xi'an Shiyou University
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
University of the West Indies at St. Augustine
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
University of Alberta
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Louisiana State University
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
University of São Paulo
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
University of Tulsa
1 publication, 0.68%
|
|
Show all (14 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
|
Countries from articles
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 122, 82.43%
Russia
122 publications, 82.43%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 40, 27.03%
Country not defined
40 publications, 27.03%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 15, 10.14%
Australia
15 publications, 10.14%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 13, 8.78%
Canada
13 publications, 8.78%
|
China
|
China, 7, 4.73%
China
7 publications, 4.73%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 4.05%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 4.05%
|
USA
|
USA, 3, 2.03%
USA
3 publications, 2.03%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.68%
France
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.68%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.68%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.68%
India
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.68%
Iran
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.68%
Norway
1 publication, 0.68%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.68%
UAE
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.68%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.68%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.68%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.68%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
Citing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 350, 22.11%
Organization not defined
350 citations, 22.11%
|
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
95 citations, 6%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
63 citations, 3.98%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
58 citations, 3.66%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
49 citations, 3.1%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
41 citations, 2.59%
|
|
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
39 citations, 2.46%
|
|
Southwest Petroleum University
38 citations, 2.4%
|
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
26 citations, 1.64%
|
|
University of Calgary
26 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Northeast Petroleum University
25 citations, 1.58%
|
|
Curtin University
21 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Jilin University
19 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
19 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Heriot-Watt University
19 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
16 citations, 1.01%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Beijing)
16 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Shiraz University
15 citations, 0.95%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
15 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
14 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Saudi Aramco
12 citations, 0.76%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
12 citations, 0.76%
|
|
University of Perugia
12 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences
12 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Texas Tech University
12 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Khalifa University
11 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
11 citations, 0.69%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
11 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
11 citations, 0.69%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
11 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Xi'an Shiyou University
11 citations, 0.69%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
10 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Tsinghua University
10 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Petronas University of Technology
10 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Chongqing University
10 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
9 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
8 citations, 0.51%
|
|
National University of Oil and Gas «Gubkin University»
8 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
8 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Yangtze University
8 citations, 0.51%
|
|
National University of Singapore
8 citations, 0.51%
|
|
University Prof. Dr. Assen Zlatarov
8 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
8 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Bonch-Bruevich Saint-Petersburg State University of Telecommunications
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Pandit Deendayal Energy University
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Chongqing University of Science and Technology
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Taiyuan University of Technology
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
University of KwaZulu-Natal
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Colorado School of Mines
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
University of Tyumen
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Industrial University of Tyumen
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Samara State Technical University
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Federal Center for Toxicological, Radiation and Biological Safety
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Ufa University of Science and Technology
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
University of Tehran
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Research Institute of Petroleum Industry Tehran
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Petroleum University of Technology Iran
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Peking University
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Tongji University
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Changzhou University
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
University of Manchester
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Keio University
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
University of Alberta
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
University of Wyoming
5 citations, 0.32%
|
|
A.E. Arbuzov Institute of Organic and Physical Chemistry of the Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Novosibirsk State University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Hakim Sabzevari University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Sultan Qaboos University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Hohai University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Jiangsu University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Guangdong University of Technology
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Northwest University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Stanford University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Shandong University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Xiangnan University
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
AGH University of Krakow
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Citing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
China
|
China, 432, 27.29%
China
432 citations, 27.29%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 321, 20.28%
Country not defined
321 citations, 20.28%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 263, 16.61%
Russia
263 citations, 16.61%
|
USA
|
USA, 126, 7.96%
USA
126 citations, 7.96%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 80, 5.05%
Iran
80 citations, 5.05%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 67, 4.23%
United Kingdom
67 citations, 4.23%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 52, 3.28%
Saudi Arabia
52 citations, 3.28%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 49, 3.1%
Australia
49 citations, 3.1%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 45, 2.84%
Canada
45 citations, 2.84%
|
India
|
India, 33, 2.08%
India
33 citations, 2.08%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 24, 1.52%
Republic of Korea
24 citations, 1.52%
|
France
|
France, 21, 1.33%
France
21 citations, 1.33%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 21, 1.33%
Malaysia
21 citations, 1.33%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 21, 1.33%
UAE
21 citations, 1.33%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 20, 1.26%
Germany
20 citations, 1.26%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 19, 1.2%
Italy
19 citations, 1.2%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 18, 1.14%
Brazil
18 citations, 1.14%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 16, 1.01%
Denmark
16 citations, 1.01%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 13, 0.82%
Netherlands
13 citations, 0.82%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 13, 0.82%
Japan
13 citations, 0.82%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 11, 0.69%
Spain
11 citations, 0.69%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 10, 0.63%
Pakistan
10 citations, 0.63%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 9, 0.57%
Bulgaria
9 citations, 0.57%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 9, 0.57%
Singapore
9 citations, 0.57%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 8, 0.51%
Norway
8 citations, 0.51%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 8, 0.51%
Poland
8 citations, 0.51%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 7, 0.44%
Kazakhstan
7 citations, 0.44%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 7, 0.44%
Iraq
7 citations, 0.44%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 7, 0.44%
Nigeria
7 citations, 0.44%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 6, 0.38%
Algeria
6 citations, 0.38%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 6, 0.38%
Kuwait
6 citations, 0.38%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 6, 0.38%
Mexico
6 citations, 0.38%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 6, 0.38%
Sweden
6 citations, 0.38%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 6, 0.38%
South Africa
6 citations, 0.38%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 5, 0.32%
Venezuela
5 citations, 0.32%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 5, 0.32%
Egypt
5 citations, 0.32%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 5, 0.32%
Oman
5 citations, 0.32%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.25%
Vietnam
4 citations, 0.25%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 4, 0.25%
Qatar
4 citations, 0.25%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0.25%
Colombia
4 citations, 0.25%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 0.25%
Thailand
4 citations, 0.25%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 4, 0.25%
Finland
4 citations, 0.25%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 3, 0.19%
Ukraine
3 citations, 0.19%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.19%
Argentina
3 citations, 0.19%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.19%
Belgium
3 citations, 0.19%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.19%
Israel
3 citations, 0.19%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.19%
Indonesia
3 citations, 0.19%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 3, 0.19%
Libya
3 citations, 0.19%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.19%
Turkey
3 citations, 0.19%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.19%
Switzerland
3 citations, 0.19%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.13%
Austria
2 citations, 0.13%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.13%
Bangladesh
2 citations, 0.13%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.13%
Ghana
2 citations, 0.13%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.13%
Greece
2 citations, 0.13%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.13%
Ireland
2 citations, 0.13%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.13%
Lebanon
2 citations, 0.13%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.13%
Czech Republic
2 citations, 0.13%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.13%
Ecuador
2 citations, 0.13%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.06%
Belarus
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.06%
Estonia
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.06%
Portugal
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.06%
Armenia
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.06%
Botswana
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.06%
Jordan
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.06%
Cameroon
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.06%
Malta
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.06%
Romania
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.06%
Tanzania
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 1, 0.06%
Uzbekistan
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.06%
Chile
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.06%
Sri Lanka
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.06%
Ethiopia
1 citation, 0.06%
|
Show all (42 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
This section displays the profiles of scientists registered on the platform. To display the full list, invite your colleagues to register.
Company/Organization
Position
Chief executive officer (CEO)
Employment type
Business
Years
2020 —
present
Company/Organization
Position
Professor
Employment type
Full time
Years
2014 —
present
Company/Organization
Position
Executive director
Employment type
Full time
Years
2011 —
2014
Company/Organization
Schlumberger
Position
Group Leader
Employment type
Full time
Years
2005 —
2011
Company/Organization
Heriot-Watt Petroleum Engineering Approved Support Centre at Tomsk Polytechnic University
Position
Teacher
Employment type
Full time
Years
2004 —
2005
Company/Organization
Position
Physics Engineer
Employment type
Full time
Years
2002 —
2004
Company/Organization
Position
Research Engineer
Employment type
Full time
Years
2001 —
2002