volume 112 pages 495-506

Applying probiotics and prebiotics in new delivery formats – is the clinical evidence transferable?

M Cunningham 1
Gabriel Vinderola 2
Dimitris Charalampopoulos 3
Sarah Lebeer 4
Mary Ellen Sanders 5
R Grimaldi 6
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-06-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR3.247
CiteScore34.2
Impact factor15.4
ISSN09242244, 18793053
Biotechnology
Food Science
Abstract
There is substantial demand for gut health products incorporating probiotics and prebiotics. They are being delivered as ingredients in an increasing range of different product formulations. While new delivery matrices are assessed for their potential impact on cell viability and prebiotic degradation, it is unknown whether they should be expected to independently alter the clinical effect of a given probiotic and prebiotic. We provide an overview of preclinical and clinical data to examine the degree to which probiotic and prebiotic efficacy may be altered by processing and incorporation into various delivery matrices. We also consider the impact of inter-individual host factors on product efficacy. We further review regulatory positions across the globe on substantiation of prebiotic and probiotic efficacy in the final product format. In vitro data suggest that the delivery matrix may interact with prebiotic and probiotic functions via various physicochemical interactions with molecular and cellular structures and changes in cellular expression. However, direct evidence to suggest these changes have a significant in vivo impact is very limited. Indeed, meta-analyses suggest a robustness of effect across delivery matrices. Regulatory expectations vary among regions, but scope typically exists for adequate scientific justification to translate probiotic or prebiotic evidence across product formats. Early evidence suggests host factors such as diet, health and microbiome status are likely to play an important role in an individual's response to a given probiotic and prebiotic. • Probiotic and prebiotic formulation changes can affect in vitro functionality. • Meta-analyses suggest a robustness of effect across different formulations. • Host microbiome, health status and meal context may influence clinical benefit. • Regulators expect scientific rationale for use of evidence across products formats. • Performance mapping can be used to assess potential matrix-related effects.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
2 publications, 3.77%
Trends in Food Science and Technology
2 publications, 3.77%
Current Opinion in Food Science
2 publications, 3.77%
Food Bioscience
2 publications, 3.77%
Frontiers in Nutrition
2 publications, 3.77%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
2 publications, 3.77%
Animals
1 publication, 1.89%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 publication, 1.89%
Catalysts
1 publication, 1.89%
Antioxidants
1 publication, 1.89%
Biotechnology for Biofuels
1 publication, 1.89%
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
1 publication, 1.89%
Journal of Functional Foods
1 publication, 1.89%
Carbohydrate Polymers
1 publication, 1.89%
Heliyon
1 publication, 1.89%
Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
1 publication, 1.89%
Food Research International
1 publication, 1.89%
International Journal of Food Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.89%
Starch/Staerke
1 publication, 1.89%
Annual review of food science and technology
1 publication, 1.89%
Sustainable Food Technology
1 publication, 1.89%
Cryobiology
1 publication, 1.89%
Frontiers in Microbiology
1 publication, 1.89%
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
1 publication, 1.89%
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
1 publication, 1.89%
Nutrients
1 publication, 1.89%
Regional Perspectives of Nature-based Solutions for Water: Benefits and Challenges
1 publication, 1.89%
American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
1 publication, 1.89%
Fermentation
1 publication, 1.89%
1
2

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Elsevier
18 publications, 33.96%
MDPI
10 publications, 18.87%
Springer Nature
9 publications, 16.98%
Wiley
5 publications, 9.43%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 5.66%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 3.77%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 1.89%
IOS Press
1 publication, 1.89%
American Physiological Society
1 publication, 1.89%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 1.89%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 1.89%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
53
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Cunningham M. et al. Applying probiotics and prebiotics in new delivery formats – is the clinical evidence transferable? // Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021. Vol. 112. pp. 495-506.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Cunningham M., Vinderola G., Charalampopoulos D., Lebeer S., Sanders M. E., Grimaldi R. Applying probiotics and prebiotics in new delivery formats – is the clinical evidence transferable? // Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021. Vol. 112. pp. 495-506.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.009
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.009
TI - Applying probiotics and prebiotics in new delivery formats – is the clinical evidence transferable?
T2 - Trends in Food Science and Technology
AU - Cunningham, M
AU - Vinderola, Gabriel
AU - Charalampopoulos, Dimitris
AU - Lebeer, Sarah
AU - Sanders, Mary Ellen
AU - Grimaldi, R
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/06/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 495-506
VL - 112
SN - 0924-2244
SN - 1879-3053
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2021_Cunningham,
author = {M Cunningham and Gabriel Vinderola and Dimitris Charalampopoulos and Sarah Lebeer and Mary Ellen Sanders and R Grimaldi},
title = {Applying probiotics and prebiotics in new delivery formats – is the clinical evidence transferable?},
journal = {Trends in Food Science and Technology},
year = {2021},
volume = {112},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.009},
pages = {495--506},
doi = {10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.009}
}