Journal of Strategic Marketing
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
3.7
SJR
1.007
CiteScore
9.2
Categories
Strategy and Management
Marketing
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Years of issue
1984, 1993-2025
journal names
Journal of Strategic Marketing
J STRATEG MARK
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Strategic Marketing
(1475 citations)

Journal of Business Research
(641 citations)

Sustainability
(567 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Deakin University
(27 publications)

University of Ulster
(24 publications)

Griffith University
(23 publications)

Griffith University
(15 publications)

Swinburne University of Technology
(11 publications)

O. P. Jindal Global University
(9 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 702
Q1

A review of silicosis and other silica-related diseases in the engineered stone countertop processing industry
Fazio J.C., Viragh K., Houlroyd J., Gandhi S.A.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
Q1

Exposure to disulfiram and incidence of parkinsonism
d’Errico A., Strippoli E., Goldman S.M., Blanc P.D.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Case reports implicate disulfiram treatment in causing parkinsonism, but these observations lack epidemiological confirmation. Aim of the present study was to estimate the risk of incident parkinsonism associated with disulfiram dispensing in a large Italian population.
Methods
In this observational cohort study, administrative data were used, linking records at the individual level from civic registries, population census, mortality registers, hospital admissions, archives of drug prescriptions, and direct ambulatory drug distribution. Participants included all residents in the Piedmont region of Italy aged ≥ 40 years participating in 2011 census, still resident and alive at the beginning of 2013, followed-up from 2013 to 2019. The outcome was incident parkinsonism identified through multiple prescriptions of levodopa or a hospital admission for Parkinson’s disease or atypical parkinsonism. Exposure to disulfiram and to neuroleptics was assessed through regional drug prescription archives. The association between disulfiram and parkinsonism onset was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for gender, age and neuroleptic use.
Results
The study population included 2,498,491 individuals (mean age: 62 years). During follow-up, 19,072 parkinsonism cases were identified, 8 of whom had been prescribed disulfiram. Exposure to disulfiram was associated with a three-fold increased risk of parkinsonism (HR = 3.10, 95% CI = 1.55–6.21) that remained significant when adjusted for neuroleptic use (HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.01–4.10). The association was stronger among persons unexposed to neuroleptics and among those with more than four disulfiram prescriptions.
Conclusions
These results support the hypothesis that disulfiram may cause parkinsonism. Clinicians and drug regulatory agencies should consider parkinsonism when assessing the risks and benefits of disulfiram use.
Q1

Cumulative risk assessment methodology applied to non-dietary exposures: developmental alterations in professional agricultural settings
Tosti L., Marazzini M., Kanadil M., Metruccio F.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The safety assessment of combined exposure to xenobiotics has been an emerging topic for several years. Methodologies and approaches for cumulative risk assessment (CRA) are being developed primarily for the dietary risk assessment of pesticides, thus focusing only on consumer exposure. However, as highlighted in recent years, non-dietary exposures, such as those encountered by professionals in agricultural settings, may pose a significant risk due to their higher levels compared to dietary exposure. Despite this, existing methodologies for cumulative risk assessment (CRA) have not adequately addressed this critical aspect. In the EU, even if several legislations highlight the need to address the non-dietary CRA, no legal requirements are in place yet, therefore, there are no harmonized methodologies and approaches currently available. In a first step to fill this gap, this study is aimed at exploring CRA methodology applied to non-dietary exposure to pesticide in agricultural settings, specifically targeting operators, re-entry workers, and bystanders. The primary objective of the study was to verify the feasibility of an electronic register of plant protection treatments as data source for identifying and characterizing in field mixtures and consequently estimating cumulative non-dietary systemic exposure in real life. The relevant active substances selected for this investigation were those listed in foetal craniofacial alterations cumulative assessment groups (CAGs), established by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for dietary CRA. Exposures to pesticides were estimated using European Union agreed mathematical models. The preliminary findings of this investigation effectively revealed the value of the register of treatments in assessing real-life plant protection products (PPP) usage in professional agricultural settings. In conclusion, the study provides encouraging insights into using the pesticide dietary CRA approach for non-dietary risk assessment in agricultural settings, underlining the necessity for further research and investigation of its feasibility for the evaluation of other acute effects but also for long-term effects related CAGs.
Q1

Herbicide-related health risks: key mechanisms and a guide to mitigation strategies
Hongoeb J., Tantimongcolwat T., Ayimbila F., Ruankham W., Phopin K.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
Q1

Toxic effects of chronic occupational mercury vapor exposure on female workers of childbearing age
Pan Y., Qu K., Li H., Song Y.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Few studies have been conducted on women of childbearing age with chronic mercury poisoning caused by mercury vapor exposure. Occupational exposure, clinical symptoms and signs, laboratory tests, auxiliary examinations, treatment, and follow-up of 31 female workers with chronic mercury poisoning from a mercury thermometer processing factory who received inpatient treatment at our hospital between September 2021 and August 2022 were analyzed. In 31 female workers of childbearing age (23–43 years) who were chronically exposed to mercury vapor (3–31 months), urinary mercury levels exceeded the normal range. The clinical manifestations were primarily neurological (96.77%). Renal pathology of the two female workers suggested membranous nephropathy in the first stage. Some female workers experienced menstrual abnormalities, anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders. Treatment was mainly chelation therapy supplemented with antioxidants and other symptomatic supportive treatments. All patients achieved good results after discontinuing exposure to mercury vapor and receiving treatment. However, follow-up after discharge revealed that some female workers still had insomnia. Occupational mercury vapor exposure is hazardous to female workers of childbearing age and increases the risk of adverse effects on their reproductive health. Occupational protection and prevention of mercury exposure in female workers of reproductive age must be emphasized.
Q1

Principles of occupational medicine: an educational case study of hazards and risks for Dr “Indiana” Jones
Erren T.C., Dietrich C., Wallraff J., Glenewinkel F., Pinger A., Lewis P.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Understanding the nature and consequences of hazards and risks in the workplace is critical to protecting people from harm. We review the fictional example of “Indiana” Jones as an educational vector to illustrate principles of occupational medicine in real-world scenarios. After reviewing the Jones saga regarding potential hazards (physical – biological – chemical – psychosocial), we provide a practical outlook on the workplace health for readers with a non-occupational medicine background.
Q1

Silicosis prevalence and related issues in India: a scoping review
Khetan M., Babu B.V.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Silicosis remains a major occupational health challenge in India. This review systematically examines the prevalence, risk factors, regional differences, and diagnostic tools specific to India’s high-risk industries. Additionally, it assesses policy gaps and offers insights from diverse clinical and qualitative studies, aiming to inform targeted public health interventions and support the development of effective occupational health policies. For this review, data were extracted for each study, including author, location, design, study aims, sample size and characteristics, participant age, duration of silica exposure, diagnostic criteria, and primary outcomes. As an add-on analysis included, a random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of silicosis and assess variability among studies. The review also included qualitative analyses on awareness, diagnostic tools (e.g., CC16 protein), and differences in prevalence across various occupational groups and regions within India. The review initially identified 263 articles, narrowed down to 49 eligible studies on silicosis in India after exclusions and quality assessment. Among these, 11 prevalence studies (total sample size: 2072) showed an average silicosis rate of 31.39%. Specific studies reported high rates, including 52% among Rajasthan mine workers and 69.1% among Khambhat agate workers. Additionally, screening tools, like CC16 protein levels, showed promise for early diagnosis, while qualitative studies highlighted gaps in awareness and regulatory practices. Meta-analysis revealed a significant pooled prevalence (25.98%) and marked variability (I2 = 98.86%), underscoring the need for targeted interventions and worker protections. This review of current knowledge on silicosis in India finds silicosis highly prevalent among workers in mining and stone industries, with gaps in regulatory enforcement and awareness. Biomarkers like CC16 offer the potential for early diagnosis, underscoring the need for preventive measures. Policy recommendations include stricter dust exposure limits, enhanced workers’ education, routine screening, and improved access to protective equipment and health monitoring to reduce the risk of silicosis and health disparities in vulnerable occupational groups.
Q1

Relationship between butyrylcholinesterase activity and hepatic transaminases: a cross-sectional study in agricultural workers from Peru
Ortiz-Delgado E., Bendezu-Quispe G., Soncco-Llulluy F., Li J., Rosales-Rimache J.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Chronic exposure to pesticides causes various adverse health effects, mainly at a neurological level. However, there is little evidence focused on liver tissue injury and transaminase activity as indicators of effect. A cross-sectional study was designed based on medical-occupational records of workers from an agro-export company in Peru to associate the levels of butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) transaminases (ALT and AST). Occupational medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic and occupational information and laboratory values of BChE activity and transaminases. We evaluated 459 records, and 69.9% were men. The mean age was 34.9 ± 11.5 years. BChE, ALT, and AST levels were 6238.8 ± 709.1 U/l, 34.4 ± 12.5 U/l, and 22.4 ± 8.5 U/l, respectively. The proportion of inhibited BCHE and elevated transaminase levels was 15.3% and 21.6%, respectively. We found a significant association between BChE inhibition and elevation of transaminases (AST: PR = 0.798, 95%CI: 0.716–0.889; ALT: PR = 0.419, 95%CI: 0.239–0.736). The potential usefulness of transaminases is shown as a biomarker of exposure and monitoring in occupational health programs for the agro-industry.
Q1

Impacts of hazardous noise levels on hearing loss and tinnitus in dental professionals
Zhang C., Young A., Rodriguez S., Schulze K.A., Surti B., Najem F., Hu J.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Hazardous noise exposure is an important health concern in many workplaces and is one of the most common work-related injuries in the United States. Dental professionals are frequently exposed to high levels of occupational noise in their daily work environment. This noise is generated by various dental handpieces such as drills, suctions, and ultrasonic scalers. Prolonged exposure to such noise levels is known to have adverse effects on hearing health. Despite the prevalence of occupational noise in dentistry, there is a paucity of research specifically examining the prevalence of hearing loss and tinnitus in dental professionals. To evaluate the prevalence of hearing loss and tinnitus, data were collected from 60 dental professionals, including participant demographics and audiometric thresholds. Thresholds were compared to the age- and sex-based reference ranges from the International Standards Organization (ISO 7029:2017). Results showed that 15–25% of males and 13–18% of females had hearing thresholds that exceeded 95th percentile limits based on the ISO normative age- and sex-distributions. Tinnitus was reported in 40% of the participants. This study is the first to examine the characteristics and prevalence of auditory dysfunctions in dental professionals compared to the ISO normative age and sex distributions of hearing status. Findings from this study highlight the need for increasing the awareness of occupational noise hazards among dental professionals and the importance of routine audiological monitoring.
Q1

Sowing seeds of awareness: a cross-sectional analysis of mental health literacy and help-seeking in Irish farmers
O’Connor S., O’Hagan A.D., Firnhaber J., O’Shaughnessy B.R., McNamara J., Breslin G., O’Keeffe S., Malone S.M.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Farmers around the world are at risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation yet many avoid seeking help. In Ireland, farmers’ mental health is a national concern, as farmers face barriers of masculine norms around help-seeking. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and relationship between mental health literacy and mental health help-seeking in the Irish farming community. It also aimed to identify if mental health literacy or mental health help-seeking differed depending on gender, age, education, health status and income level. We conducted a cross-sectional assessment of 351 Irish farmers’ mental health literacy and help-seeking using validated psychometric measures: the Mental Help Seeking Intention Scale (MHSIS), the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Short Form (ATSPPH-SF), and the Multicomponent Mental Health Literacy Measure (MMHL). Irish farmers’ mental health literacy and help-seeking scores were interrelated. Though low, farmers’ scores were comparable to the general population and higher than some European samples. Despite broadly favourable attitudes towards seeking professional mental health help, Irish farmers perceived significant barriers to accessing care and exhibited stoic health attitudes. Farmers with less education and men were particularly at risk. Irish farmers’ stoic attitudes may be a response to their perceived lack of services. Interventions providing mental health literacy education and improving access to existing mental health services are particularly important for this population of farmers.
Q1

Police officer occupational health: a model of organizational constraints, trauma exposure, perceived resources, and agency
Anders R., Frapsauce A., Sauvezon C., Gilibert D.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Police officers constitute a work force at high risk due to their highly demanding work conditions. In a realistic paradigm, these conditions, and other determinants of their psychological health, can be linked to a multitude of variables that interplay altogether. However, current literature that simultaneously models–quantitatively from observed data–such a multitude of variables is sparse. This study took upon this objective to further theoretical and applied understandings through a measurement framework on empirical data, and allow the data to drive some features of model development, such as variable groupings into factors, and paths between factors. A total of 1312 officers from various police bureaus fully responded to a questionnaire composed of validated instruments for assessing factors related to psychological and occupational health, consisting of more than 25 variables. Statistical analyses were performed in progressing complexity, namely t-tests, correlations, multiple regression, factor analysis, and path analysis with latent factors. The regression analysis identified 10 significant variables, in which decision latitude, organizational justice, and work recognition/meaning were the most protective, and these 10 variables coincided with those found significant in the t-test and correlational results. In higher complexity, the latent path analysis resulted in a model of 6 factors: Psychological Health, Organizational Constraints, Trauma Exposure, Perceived Resources, Sense of Agency, and Esteem. Organizational Constraints (β = -0.32, inferred by psychological demands and role conflict), Perceived Resources (β = 0.31, social support, a self/work-esteem subfactor, and organizational justice), Sense of Agency (β = 0.30, decision latitude, hierarchical position, right to carry a firearm), and Trauma Exposure (β = -0.14, frequency/time since event, used a firearm, years of service) were found significantly associated with Psychological Health. Within each factor, specific variables could be identified as the most associated, such as role conflict for constraints, self/work-esteem for resources, decision latitude for agency, and frequency of and time since trauma for trauma exposure. Our results therefore encourage us to take into account not only agency, but also past professional experiences in models for managing well-being. Providing police officers with social support at work, recognition, work meaning, fair proceedings and pay (organizational justice, especially for female and young officers), decision-making power (decision latitude), and minimizing conflictual information and procedures (role conflict) is of utmost importance. Officers with higher years of service, working in lower population cities, and who recently used their firearm, should be considered for trauma counseling. The degree of psychological demands of police officers should be regularly assessed, and reduced if possible. Reminders of support and integration in the force for officers with variables linked to a perceived lack of agency may be useful in their facing work challenges. Future integrative modeling research may be crucial to better understanding the relative contribution of each variable and their interplay in realistic settings, providing also a framework for measurement.
Q1

Pathological characterization of lung fibrosis in Sprague–Dawley rats treated with fluoro-edenite fibres by intrapleural injection
Tibaldi E., Gnudi F., Mandrioli D., Bruno C., Zona A., Fazzo L., Comba P.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
An increased incidence of pleural mesotheliomas in Biancavilla (Italy) was attributed to the environmental exposure to fluoro-edenite (FE). Results from the Ramazzini Institute (RI) in vivo long-term study confirmed the evidence that exposure to FE fibres is correlated with an increase of malignant pleural mesotheliomas in Sprague–Dawley rats. Recently asbestosis-like features were substantiated in Biancavilla residents without known occupational exposures. Aim of this work was to establish whether FE induce lung fibrosis with a pathogenetic mechanism similar to other asbestiform fibres. Original slides from the RI study were systematically re-examined to characterize the FE-induced lesions. Quantitative analysis of lung fibrosis was assessed following the Ashcroft method. Immunohistochemical analysis of protein involved in fibrotic responses and histochemical staining for FE-fibres identification were performed. Like asbestos, FE caused fibrotic lesions, pleural plaques or nodules and mesotheliomas. A significant increase of lung fibrosis (p < 0.001) was observed in the FE-treated groups compared to untreated controls. In the fibrotic responses to FE, vimentin was the most expressed protein, followed by collagen-I and alpha-SMA. Finally, ferruginous bodies, characterized by iron deposits and ferritin expression, were observed in FE-induced lesions. This study confirmed that FE exposure promotes the onset of fibrotic lesions at pleural level, as fibrous plaques or nodules and fibrosis, through a mechanism similar to other form of asbestos. These results combined with epidemiological study reported in Biancavilla residents, corroborate the need to promote health and epidemiological surveillance plans of respiratory diseases in population living in FE contaminated sites.
Q1

Retention of nickel, cobalt and chromium in skin at conditions mimicking intense hand hygiene practices using water, soap, and hand-disinfectant in vitro
Vilela L., Schenk L., Julander A., Midander K.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased hand hygiene practices using water, soap and hand disinfectants, became prevalent, particularly among frontline workers. This study investigates the impact of these practices on the skin’s ability to retain the allergenic metals nickel, cobalt, and chromium. The study constitutes three parts: (I) creating an impaired skin barrier, (II) exposing treated and untreated skin to nickel alone, and (III) in co-exposure with cobalt and chromium.
Methods
Using full-thickness skin from stillborn piglets, in vitro experiments were conducted to assess retention of metals in skin at conditions mimicking intense hand hygiene practices. Treatment of skin with varying concentrations of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), to impair its barrier integrity was assessed. This was followed by exposure of treated and untreated skin to the metals, that were dissolved in Milli-Q water, 0.5% SLS, and ethanol respectively.
Results
Results showed that pre-treatment with 5% SLS impaired the skin barrier with regards to the measure of trans epidermal water loss (TEWL). Metal amounts retained in the skin were generally higher in treated than untreated skin. The highest amounts of metal retained in skin were observed for exposure to nickel in ethanol. Co-exposure to nickel, cobalt, and chromium in 0.5% SLS resulted in the highest amounts of total metal retention.
Conclusions
The in vitro findings highlight the increased risk of metal retention in skin due to an impaired barrier. The SLS concentration used in the current study corresponds to those used in many hand hygiene products. Hence, occupational settings with frequent exposure to water, soap and disinfectants need to consider protective measures not only for the irritant exposures themselves but also simultaneous exposure to allergenic metals.
Q1

Long-term course and factors influencing work ability and return to work in post-COVID patients 12 months after inpatient rehabilitation
Müller K., Poppele I., Ottiger M., Wastlhuber A., Weber R., Stegbauer M., Schlesinger T.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in restoring work ability and facilitating the reintegration of post-COVID patients into the workforce. The impact of rehabilitation on work ability and return to work (RTW) of post-COVID patients remains poorly understood. This study was conducted to assess the work ability and RTW of post-COVID patients before rehabilitation and 12 months after rehabilitation and to identify physical and neuropsychological health factors influencing RTW 12 months after rehabilitation.
Methods
This longitudinal observational study included 114 post-COVID patients with work-related SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent inpatient post-COVID rehabilitation with indicative focus on pulmonology and/or psychotraumatology (interval between date of SARS-CoV-2 infection and start of rehabilitation: M = 412.90 days). Employment status, work ability, and the subjective prognosis of employment (SPE) scale were assessed before rehabilitation (T1) and 12 months after rehabilitation (T4). The predictors analysed at T4 were functional exercise capacity, physical activity, subjective physical and mental health status, fatigue, depression, and cognitive function. Longitudinal analyses were performed via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Logistic and linear regression analyses identified predictors of work ability and return to work (RTW), whereas mediation analyses examined the relationships between these predictors and work ability.
Results
At T4, the median of WAI total score indicated poor work ability, which significantly worsened over time (p < 0.001; r = 0.484). The SPE scale significantly increased from T1 to T4 (p = 0.022, r = -0.216). A total of 48.6% of patients had returned to work 12 months after rehabilitation. Fatigue was identified as the main predictor of reduced work ability and RTW, with each unit increase in fatigue severity decreasing the odds of RTW by 3.1%. In addition, physical capacity and subjective health status were significant predictors of perceived work ability.
Conclusions
The findings highlight the significant challenges that post-COVID patients face in regaining work ability and achieving successful RTW 12 months after rehabilitation. Fatigue appears to be an important predictor of work ability and RTW. To optimize recovery and enhance both biopsychosocial health and work ability, it is crucial to develop and implement personalised interventions that address fatigue, improve physical capacity, and support mental health.
Trial registration
This study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under DRKS00022928.
Q1

Associations between job demand-control-support and high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden: a cross-sectional study
Christiansen F., Gynning B.E., Lashari A., Zuberbühler J.P., Johansson G., Brulin E.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The knowledge about job demands, control, and support, and their potential associations with burnout risk among physicians in Sweden, is limited. This study aimed to explore (i) factors of the JobDemand-Control-Support (J-DCS) model across different groups of physicians in Sweden, (ii) their association with high burnout risk, and (iii) the potential buffering impact of job control and support.
Methods
Cross-sectional data from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Health in Healthcare Survey (LOHHCS) study cohort was used. In 2021, a total of 2032 respondents submitted questionnaire data comprising J-DCS measures (i.e., job demands, workplace control and task-level control, and social support from peers and managers). Burnout risk was measured using the Burnout Assessment Tool. Binary logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between the J-DCS variables and high burnout risk. Interaction analysis was performed to explore any moderation of the associations.
Results
Job demands were significantly associated with increased odds of high burnout risk (odds ratio (OR) 2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91–3.84. Workplace control (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.35–0.71) and peer support (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48–0.77) were significantly associated with reduced odds of high burnout risk. The interaction analysis showed no significant moderation of the association between job demands and high burnout risk by either peer support or workplace control, and no buffering impact was found.
Conclusion
Job demands were associated with high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden. Although workplace control and peer support had inverse associations with high burnout risk, no moderation or buffering impact on the association between job demands and high burnout risk was found. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these associations.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
|
Journal of Strategic Marketing
1475 citations, 6.16%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
641 citations, 2.67%
|
|
Sustainability
567 citations, 2.37%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
424 citations, 1.77%
|
|
European Journal of Marketing
380 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
353 citations, 1.47%
|
|
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
313 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Marketing Intelligence and Planning
284 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
268 citations, 1.12%
|
|
International Journal of Consumer Studies
241 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Management
238 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Journal of Product and Brand Management
195 citations, 0.81%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
188 citations, 0.78%
|
|
International Marketing Review
159 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
158 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Journal of Brand Management
154 citations, 0.64%
|
|
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
147 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship
145 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
138 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
130 citations, 0.54%
|
|
International Journal of Bank Marketing
128 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
124 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Services Marketing
120 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
119 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
113 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Psychology and Marketing
110 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Management Decision
107 citations, 0.45%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
105 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Qualitative Market Research
100 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
97 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
93 citations, 0.39%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
91 citations, 0.38%
|
|
International Business Review
83 citations, 0.35%
|
|
European Business Review
80 citations, 0.33%
|
|
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research
78 citations, 0.33%
|
|
British Food Journal
78 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Marketing
76 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Australasian Marketing Journal
76 citations, 0.32%
|
|
International Journal of Emerging Markets
69 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Business Strategy and the Environment
66 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Communications
65 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Benchmarking
64 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Promotion Management
64 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice
62 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Internet Research
62 citations, 0.26%
|
|
European Management Journal
61 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Marketing for Higher Education
61 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Financial Services Marketing
61 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SAGE Open
61 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
60 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Information Management
60 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Service Management
60 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
58 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Analytics
58 citations, 0.24%
|
|
European Journal of Innovation Management
57 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Knowledge Management
54 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
54 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Heliyon
53 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
52 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Business Opportunities
49 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Global Marketing
48 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship
47 citations, 0.2%
|
|
TQM Journal
47 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
46 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
46 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Market Research
45 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Industrial Management and Data Systems
45 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Young Consumers
44 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Tourism Management
44 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Innovation Management
43 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Marketing Theory
42 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Total Quality Management and Business Excellence
41 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Relationship Marketing
41 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Contributions to Management Science
40 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of International Marketing
40 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing
40 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Macromarketing
38 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Travel Research
38 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research
38 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Small Business Management
37 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
37 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
36 citations, 0.15%
|
|
European Sport Management Quarterly
35 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Corporate Reputation Review
35 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing
34 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Review of Managerial Science
34 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research
34 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
33 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
33 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Marketing
32 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Responsibility Journal
32 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
32 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Management Research Review
32 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
32 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
32 citations, 0.13%
|
|
PLoS ONE
32 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management
32 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Product Innovation Management
31 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Service Research
31 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing
31 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
Emerald
5734 citations, 23.93%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4361 citations, 18.2%
|
|
Elsevier
3675 citations, 15.34%
|
|
Springer Nature
2358 citations, 9.84%
|
|
Wiley
1344 citations, 5.61%
|
|
MDPI
1007 citations, 4.2%
|
|
SAGE
1003 citations, 4.19%
|
|
IGI Global
968 citations, 4.04%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
300 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
200 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
191 citations, 0.8%
|
|
World Scientific
102 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
94 citations, 0.39%
|
|
CAIRN
65 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
55 citations, 0.23%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
52 citations, 0.22%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
50 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
48 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Marketing Association
46 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
41 citations, 0.17%
|
|
AOSIS
37 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Oxford University Press
36 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IOP Publishing
36 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
36 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
36 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Human Kinetics
36 citations, 0.15%
|
|
SciELO
35 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
29 citations, 0.12%
|
|
EDP Sciences
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
27 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
26 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
25 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
24 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
24 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IntechOpen
23 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Japan Marketing Academy
20 citations, 0.08%
|
|
JMIR Publications
19 citations, 0.08%
|
|
F1000 Research
18 citations, 0.08%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
18 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Japan Society of Marketing and Distribution
18 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
14 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AIP Publishing
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Brazilian Administration Review
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
International Management Development Association
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academy of Management
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
OpenEdition
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Transportation and Logistics
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Advertising Research Foundation
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Prague University of Economics and Business
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Science Alert
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IAE School of Management Montpellier University
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidad Icesi
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Quality
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Accounting Association
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editura Economica
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Opatija
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Intellect
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Inovatus Usluge d.o.o.
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Lavoisier
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association of Professional Managers in South Africa
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
BMJ
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
A and V Publications
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mendel University Press
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Food and Agribusiness Management Association
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Editura ASE Bucuresti
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
EPI SCP
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Wageningen Academic Publishers
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Chemical Fibres
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
DMSP Research Center, Paris-Dauphine University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
FSBEI HE Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SEISENSE Private, Ltd.
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Franco Angeli
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korea Contents Association
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Deakin University
27 publications, 2.42%
|
|
University of Ulster
24 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Griffith University
23 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Loughborough University
18 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
18 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
18 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Cardiff University
13 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Aston University
12 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Coventry University
12 publications, 1.08%
|
|
American University of Sharjah
11 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Melbourne
11 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Queensland
11 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Western Australia
11 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Swansea University
11 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
10 publications, 0.9%
|
|
O. P. Jindal Global University
9 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Birmingham
9 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of New South Wales
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Roskilde University
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Monash University
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Macquarie University
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
La Trobe University
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Tasmania
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Leicester
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Texas A&M University
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Southampton
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Auckland
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Canterbury
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of the Sunshine Coast
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Carleton University
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Warwick
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Nicosia
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Curtin University
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Vienna
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Ottawa
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Nova Southeastern University
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Reading
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
De Montfort University
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of North Texas
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Bath
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
British University in Dubai
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Jammu
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Ranchi
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Rohtak
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Liverpool
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Nottingham
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Florida State University
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Puerto Rico
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Leeds
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
East Carolina University
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Porto
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Louisville
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Mumbai
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Monash University Malaysia
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Northern University of Malaysia
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Lulea University of Technology
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Birmingham City University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Sydney
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Wollongong
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Charles Darwin University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Wollongong in Dubai
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Towson University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
San Diego State University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Loyola University New Orleans
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of East Anglia
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Cranfield University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Texas State University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Alfaisal University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Mumbai
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Thuongmai University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Tampere University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology, Sarawak Campus
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Sunway University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Aalto University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Western Sydney University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Glasgow
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Bocconi University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
Griffith University
15 publications, 5.26%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
11 publications, 3.86%
|
|
O. P. Jindal Global University
9 publications, 3.16%
|
|
Loughborough University
7 publications, 2.46%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
7 publications, 2.46%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
6 publications, 2.11%
|
|
University of Nicosia
6 publications, 2.11%
|
|
University of Southampton
5 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Deakin University
5 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of the Sunshine Coast
5 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of Leicester
5 publications, 1.75%
|
|
American University of Sharjah
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Ranchi
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Melbourne
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Western Australia
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Macquarie University
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
San Diego State University
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Loyola University New Orleans
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Puerto Rico
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Carleton University
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Ottawa
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Texas State University
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Coventry University
4 publications, 1.4%
|
|
British University in Dubai
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Mumbai
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Sunway University
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Northern University of Malaysia
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Lulea University of Technology
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Florida State University
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Birmingham
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Wollongong
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Southern Queensland
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Charles Darwin University
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Cape Town
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Hanyang University
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Swansea University
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Cardiff University
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Northumbria University
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
East Carolina University
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Victoria
3 publications, 1.05%
|
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Symbiosis International University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Shillong
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Raipur
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Visakhapatnam
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Ho Chi Minh City International University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Mahindra University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Ahlia University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology, Sarawak Campus
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Western Sydney University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Bologna
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
American University of Beirut
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Aston University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Lebanese American University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Beirut Arab University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Shanghai University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Liverpool
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Bocconi University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Bergamo
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Auckland
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Massey University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Curtin University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
La Trobe University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of South Australia
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Wollongong in Dubai
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Towson University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Central Michigan University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Vienna
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Porto
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
East Tennessee State University
2 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Alfaisal University
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
University of Tehran
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Khalifa University
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Abu Dhabi University
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Gulf Medical University
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Shahid Beheshti University
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
University of Hyderabad
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
University of Jammu
1 publication, 0.35%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 249, 22.35%
United Kingdom
249 publications, 22.35%
|
USA
|
USA, 200, 17.95%
USA
200 publications, 17.95%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 183, 16.43%
Australia
183 publications, 16.43%
|
India
|
India, 94, 8.44%
India
94 publications, 8.44%
|
France
|
France, 53, 4.76%
France
53 publications, 4.76%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 43, 3.86%
Canada
43 publications, 3.86%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 32, 2.87%
New Zealand
32 publications, 2.87%
|
China
|
China, 30, 2.69%
China
30 publications, 2.69%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 30, 2.69%
Malaysia
30 publications, 2.69%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 28, 2.51%
Italy
28 publications, 2.51%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 26, 2.33%
UAE
26 publications, 2.33%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 19, 1.71%
Ireland
19 publications, 1.71%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 17, 1.53%
Denmark
17 publications, 1.53%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 16, 1.44%
Spain
16 publications, 1.44%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 14, 1.26%
Germany
14 publications, 1.26%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 14, 1.26%
Finland
14 publications, 1.26%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 13, 1.17%
Vietnam
13 publications, 1.17%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 13, 1.17%
Sweden
13 publications, 1.17%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 12, 1.08%
Portugal
12 publications, 1.08%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 10, 0.9%
Netherlands
10 publications, 0.9%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 9, 0.81%
Iran
9 publications, 0.81%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 9, 0.81%
Saudi Arabia
9 publications, 0.81%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 8, 0.72%
Austria
8 publications, 0.72%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 8, 0.72%
Ghana
8 publications, 0.72%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 7, 0.63%
Norway
7 publications, 0.63%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 0.63%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 0.63%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 7, 0.63%
Thailand
7 publications, 0.63%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 7, 0.63%
South Africa
7 publications, 0.63%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 6, 0.54%
Cyprus
6 publications, 0.54%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 6, 0.54%
Lebanon
6 publications, 0.54%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.45%
Greece
5 publications, 0.45%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 0.45%
Pakistan
5 publications, 0.45%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 5, 0.45%
Singapore
5 publications, 0.45%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 0.45%
Turkey
5 publications, 0.45%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 5, 0.45%
Switzerland
5 publications, 0.45%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 0.45%
Japan
5 publications, 0.45%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 0.36%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 0.36%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 4, 0.36%
Bahrain
4 publications, 0.36%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.36%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.36%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 4, 0.36%
Monaco
4 publications, 0.36%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.27%
Russia
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.27%
Poland
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 0.27%
Tunisia
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.27%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.18%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.18%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.18%
Israel
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.18%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.18%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.18%
Oman
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.18%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.09%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.09%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.09%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.09%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.09%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.09%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.09%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.09%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.09%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.09%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.09%
Malta
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.09%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.09%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.09%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.09%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.09%
Romania
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.09%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 1, 0.09%
Fiji
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.09%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.09%
Chile
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Show all (41 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Australia
|
Australia, 66, 23.16%
Australia
66 publications, 23.16%
|
USA
|
USA, 60, 21.05%
USA
60 publications, 21.05%
|
India
|
India, 54, 18.95%
India
54 publications, 18.95%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 52, 18.25%
United Kingdom
52 publications, 18.25%
|
France
|
France, 25, 8.77%
France
25 publications, 8.77%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 21, 7.37%
Canada
21 publications, 7.37%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 17, 5.96%
Malaysia
17 publications, 5.96%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 15, 5.26%
Italy
15 publications, 5.26%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 15, 5.26%
UAE
15 publications, 5.26%
|
China
|
China, 14, 4.91%
China
14 publications, 4.91%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 11, 3.86%
New Zealand
11 publications, 3.86%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 7, 2.46%
Vietnam
7 publications, 2.46%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 6, 2.11%
Portugal
6 publications, 2.11%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 6, 2.11%
Cyprus
6 publications, 2.11%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 6, 2.11%
Lebanon
6 publications, 2.11%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 5, 1.75%
Saudi Arabia
5 publications, 1.75%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 1.75%
Sweden
5 publications, 1.75%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 5, 1.75%
South Africa
5 publications, 1.75%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 1.4%
Iran
4 publications, 1.4%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 1.4%
Ireland
4 publications, 1.4%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 4, 1.4%
Monaco
4 publications, 1.4%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 1.4%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 1.4%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 1.05%
Germany
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 1.05%
Austria
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 3, 1.05%
Bahrain
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 3, 1.05%
Spain
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 1.05%
Norway
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 1.05%
Pakistan
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 1.05%
Thailand
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 1.05%
Tunisia
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 1.05%
Turkey
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 1.05%
Japan
3 publications, 1.05%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.7%
Russia
2 publications, 0.7%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.7%
Ghana
2 publications, 0.7%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.7%
Greece
2 publications, 0.7%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.7%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.7%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.7%
Poland
2 publications, 0.7%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.7%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.7%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.35%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.35%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.35%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.35%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.35%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.35%
Israel
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.35%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.35%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.35%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.35%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.35%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.35%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.35%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.35%
Malta
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.35%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.35%
Oman
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.35%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.35%
Romania
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.35%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 1, 0.35%
Fiji
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.35%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.35%
Finland
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.35%
Chile
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.35%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.35%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.35%
|
Show all (33 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|