Journal of Service Theory and Practice
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
3.9
SJR
1.309
CiteScore
8.0
Categories
Strategy and Management
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Years of issue
2015-2025
journal names
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
J SERV THEOR PRACT
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Service Theory and Practice
(871 citations)

Journal of Services Marketing
(250 citations)

Journal of Business Research
(249 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Monash University
(7 publications)

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
(6 publications)

Swinburne University of Technology
(6 publications)

Queensland University of Technology
(4 publications)

Indian Institute of Management Indore
(3 publications)

Massey University
(3 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 702
Q1

A review of silicosis and other silica-related diseases in the engineered stone countertop processing industry
Fazio J.C., Viragh K., Houlroyd J., Gandhi S.A.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
Q1

Exposure to disulfiram and incidence of parkinsonism
d’Errico A., Strippoli E., Goldman S.M., Blanc P.D.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Case reports implicate disulfiram treatment in causing parkinsonism, but these observations lack epidemiological confirmation. Aim of the present study was to estimate the risk of incident parkinsonism associated with disulfiram dispensing in a large Italian population.
Methods
In this observational cohort study, administrative data were used, linking records at the individual level from civic registries, population census, mortality registers, hospital admissions, archives of drug prescriptions, and direct ambulatory drug distribution. Participants included all residents in the Piedmont region of Italy aged ≥ 40 years participating in 2011 census, still resident and alive at the beginning of 2013, followed-up from 2013 to 2019. The outcome was incident parkinsonism identified through multiple prescriptions of levodopa or a hospital admission for Parkinson’s disease or atypical parkinsonism. Exposure to disulfiram and to neuroleptics was assessed through regional drug prescription archives. The association between disulfiram and parkinsonism onset was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for gender, age and neuroleptic use.
Results
The study population included 2,498,491 individuals (mean age: 62 years). During follow-up, 19,072 parkinsonism cases were identified, 8 of whom had been prescribed disulfiram. Exposure to disulfiram was associated with a three-fold increased risk of parkinsonism (HR = 3.10, 95% CI = 1.55–6.21) that remained significant when adjusted for neuroleptic use (HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.01–4.10). The association was stronger among persons unexposed to neuroleptics and among those with more than four disulfiram prescriptions.
Conclusions
These results support the hypothesis that disulfiram may cause parkinsonism. Clinicians and drug regulatory agencies should consider parkinsonism when assessing the risks and benefits of disulfiram use.
Q1

Cumulative risk assessment methodology applied to non-dietary exposures: developmental alterations in professional agricultural settings
Tosti L., Marazzini M., Kanadil M., Metruccio F.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The safety assessment of combined exposure to xenobiotics has been an emerging topic for several years. Methodologies and approaches for cumulative risk assessment (CRA) are being developed primarily for the dietary risk assessment of pesticides, thus focusing only on consumer exposure. However, as highlighted in recent years, non-dietary exposures, such as those encountered by professionals in agricultural settings, may pose a significant risk due to their higher levels compared to dietary exposure. Despite this, existing methodologies for cumulative risk assessment (CRA) have not adequately addressed this critical aspect. In the EU, even if several legislations highlight the need to address the non-dietary CRA, no legal requirements are in place yet, therefore, there are no harmonized methodologies and approaches currently available. In a first step to fill this gap, this study is aimed at exploring CRA methodology applied to non-dietary exposure to pesticide in agricultural settings, specifically targeting operators, re-entry workers, and bystanders. The primary objective of the study was to verify the feasibility of an electronic register of plant protection treatments as data source for identifying and characterizing in field mixtures and consequently estimating cumulative non-dietary systemic exposure in real life. The relevant active substances selected for this investigation were those listed in foetal craniofacial alterations cumulative assessment groups (CAGs), established by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for dietary CRA. Exposures to pesticides were estimated using European Union agreed mathematical models. The preliminary findings of this investigation effectively revealed the value of the register of treatments in assessing real-life plant protection products (PPP) usage in professional agricultural settings. In conclusion, the study provides encouraging insights into using the pesticide dietary CRA approach for non-dietary risk assessment in agricultural settings, underlining the necessity for further research and investigation of its feasibility for the evaluation of other acute effects but also for long-term effects related CAGs.
Q1

Herbicide-related health risks: key mechanisms and a guide to mitigation strategies
Hongoeb J., Tantimongcolwat T., Ayimbila F., Ruankham W., Phopin K.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
Q1

Toxic effects of chronic occupational mercury vapor exposure on female workers of childbearing age
Pan Y., Qu K., Li H., Song Y.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Few studies have been conducted on women of childbearing age with chronic mercury poisoning caused by mercury vapor exposure. Occupational exposure, clinical symptoms and signs, laboratory tests, auxiliary examinations, treatment, and follow-up of 31 female workers with chronic mercury poisoning from a mercury thermometer processing factory who received inpatient treatment at our hospital between September 2021 and August 2022 were analyzed. In 31 female workers of childbearing age (23–43 years) who were chronically exposed to mercury vapor (3–31 months), urinary mercury levels exceeded the normal range. The clinical manifestations were primarily neurological (96.77%). Renal pathology of the two female workers suggested membranous nephropathy in the first stage. Some female workers experienced menstrual abnormalities, anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders. Treatment was mainly chelation therapy supplemented with antioxidants and other symptomatic supportive treatments. All patients achieved good results after discontinuing exposure to mercury vapor and receiving treatment. However, follow-up after discharge revealed that some female workers still had insomnia. Occupational mercury vapor exposure is hazardous to female workers of childbearing age and increases the risk of adverse effects on their reproductive health. Occupational protection and prevention of mercury exposure in female workers of reproductive age must be emphasized.
Q1

Principles of occupational medicine: an educational case study of hazards and risks for Dr “Indiana” Jones
Erren T.C., Dietrich C., Wallraff J., Glenewinkel F., Pinger A., Lewis P.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Understanding the nature and consequences of hazards and risks in the workplace is critical to protecting people from harm. We review the fictional example of “Indiana” Jones as an educational vector to illustrate principles of occupational medicine in real-world scenarios. After reviewing the Jones saga regarding potential hazards (physical – biological – chemical – psychosocial), we provide a practical outlook on the workplace health for readers with a non-occupational medicine background.
Q1

Silicosis prevalence and related issues in India: a scoping review
Khetan M., Babu B.V.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Silicosis remains a major occupational health challenge in India. This review systematically examines the prevalence, risk factors, regional differences, and diagnostic tools specific to India’s high-risk industries. Additionally, it assesses policy gaps and offers insights from diverse clinical and qualitative studies, aiming to inform targeted public health interventions and support the development of effective occupational health policies. For this review, data were extracted for each study, including author, location, design, study aims, sample size and characteristics, participant age, duration of silica exposure, diagnostic criteria, and primary outcomes. As an add-on analysis included, a random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of silicosis and assess variability among studies. The review also included qualitative analyses on awareness, diagnostic tools (e.g., CC16 protein), and differences in prevalence across various occupational groups and regions within India. The review initially identified 263 articles, narrowed down to 49 eligible studies on silicosis in India after exclusions and quality assessment. Among these, 11 prevalence studies (total sample size: 2072) showed an average silicosis rate of 31.39%. Specific studies reported high rates, including 52% among Rajasthan mine workers and 69.1% among Khambhat agate workers. Additionally, screening tools, like CC16 protein levels, showed promise for early diagnosis, while qualitative studies highlighted gaps in awareness and regulatory practices. Meta-analysis revealed a significant pooled prevalence (25.98%) and marked variability (I2 = 98.86%), underscoring the need for targeted interventions and worker protections. This review of current knowledge on silicosis in India finds silicosis highly prevalent among workers in mining and stone industries, with gaps in regulatory enforcement and awareness. Biomarkers like CC16 offer the potential for early diagnosis, underscoring the need for preventive measures. Policy recommendations include stricter dust exposure limits, enhanced workers’ education, routine screening, and improved access to protective equipment and health monitoring to reduce the risk of silicosis and health disparities in vulnerable occupational groups.
Q1

Relationship between butyrylcholinesterase activity and hepatic transaminases: a cross-sectional study in agricultural workers from Peru
Ortiz-Delgado E., Bendezu-Quispe G., Soncco-Llulluy F., Li J., Rosales-Rimache J.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Chronic exposure to pesticides causes various adverse health effects, mainly at a neurological level. However, there is little evidence focused on liver tissue injury and transaminase activity as indicators of effect. A cross-sectional study was designed based on medical-occupational records of workers from an agro-export company in Peru to associate the levels of butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) transaminases (ALT and AST). Occupational medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic and occupational information and laboratory values of BChE activity and transaminases. We evaluated 459 records, and 69.9% were men. The mean age was 34.9 ± 11.5 years. BChE, ALT, and AST levels were 6238.8 ± 709.1 U/l, 34.4 ± 12.5 U/l, and 22.4 ± 8.5 U/l, respectively. The proportion of inhibited BCHE and elevated transaminase levels was 15.3% and 21.6%, respectively. We found a significant association between BChE inhibition and elevation of transaminases (AST: PR = 0.798, 95%CI: 0.716–0.889; ALT: PR = 0.419, 95%CI: 0.239–0.736). The potential usefulness of transaminases is shown as a biomarker of exposure and monitoring in occupational health programs for the agro-industry.
Q1

Impacts of hazardous noise levels on hearing loss and tinnitus in dental professionals
Zhang C., Young A., Rodriguez S., Schulze K.A., Surti B., Najem F., Hu J.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Hazardous noise exposure is an important health concern in many workplaces and is one of the most common work-related injuries in the United States. Dental professionals are frequently exposed to high levels of occupational noise in their daily work environment. This noise is generated by various dental handpieces such as drills, suctions, and ultrasonic scalers. Prolonged exposure to such noise levels is known to have adverse effects on hearing health. Despite the prevalence of occupational noise in dentistry, there is a paucity of research specifically examining the prevalence of hearing loss and tinnitus in dental professionals. To evaluate the prevalence of hearing loss and tinnitus, data were collected from 60 dental professionals, including participant demographics and audiometric thresholds. Thresholds were compared to the age- and sex-based reference ranges from the International Standards Organization (ISO 7029:2017). Results showed that 15–25% of males and 13–18% of females had hearing thresholds that exceeded 95th percentile limits based on the ISO normative age- and sex-distributions. Tinnitus was reported in 40% of the participants. This study is the first to examine the characteristics and prevalence of auditory dysfunctions in dental professionals compared to the ISO normative age and sex distributions of hearing status. Findings from this study highlight the need for increasing the awareness of occupational noise hazards among dental professionals and the importance of routine audiological monitoring.
Q1

Sowing seeds of awareness: a cross-sectional analysis of mental health literacy and help-seeking in Irish farmers
O’Connor S., O’Hagan A.D., Firnhaber J., O’Shaughnessy B.R., McNamara J., Breslin G., O’Keeffe S., Malone S.M.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Farmers around the world are at risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation yet many avoid seeking help. In Ireland, farmers’ mental health is a national concern, as farmers face barriers of masculine norms around help-seeking. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and relationship between mental health literacy and mental health help-seeking in the Irish farming community. It also aimed to identify if mental health literacy or mental health help-seeking differed depending on gender, age, education, health status and income level. We conducted a cross-sectional assessment of 351 Irish farmers’ mental health literacy and help-seeking using validated psychometric measures: the Mental Help Seeking Intention Scale (MHSIS), the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Short Form (ATSPPH-SF), and the Multicomponent Mental Health Literacy Measure (MMHL). Irish farmers’ mental health literacy and help-seeking scores were interrelated. Though low, farmers’ scores were comparable to the general population and higher than some European samples. Despite broadly favourable attitudes towards seeking professional mental health help, Irish farmers perceived significant barriers to accessing care and exhibited stoic health attitudes. Farmers with less education and men were particularly at risk. Irish farmers’ stoic attitudes may be a response to their perceived lack of services. Interventions providing mental health literacy education and improving access to existing mental health services are particularly important for this population of farmers.
Q1

Police officer occupational health: a model of organizational constraints, trauma exposure, perceived resources, and agency
Anders R., Frapsauce A., Sauvezon C., Gilibert D.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Police officers constitute a work force at high risk due to their highly demanding work conditions. In a realistic paradigm, these conditions, and other determinants of their psychological health, can be linked to a multitude of variables that interplay altogether. However, current literature that simultaneously models–quantitatively from observed data–such a multitude of variables is sparse. This study took upon this objective to further theoretical and applied understandings through a measurement framework on empirical data, and allow the data to drive some features of model development, such as variable groupings into factors, and paths between factors. A total of 1312 officers from various police bureaus fully responded to a questionnaire composed of validated instruments for assessing factors related to psychological and occupational health, consisting of more than 25 variables. Statistical analyses were performed in progressing complexity, namely t-tests, correlations, multiple regression, factor analysis, and path analysis with latent factors. The regression analysis identified 10 significant variables, in which decision latitude, organizational justice, and work recognition/meaning were the most protective, and these 10 variables coincided with those found significant in the t-test and correlational results. In higher complexity, the latent path analysis resulted in a model of 6 factors: Psychological Health, Organizational Constraints, Trauma Exposure, Perceived Resources, Sense of Agency, and Esteem. Organizational Constraints (β = -0.32, inferred by psychological demands and role conflict), Perceived Resources (β = 0.31, social support, a self/work-esteem subfactor, and organizational justice), Sense of Agency (β = 0.30, decision latitude, hierarchical position, right to carry a firearm), and Trauma Exposure (β = -0.14, frequency/time since event, used a firearm, years of service) were found significantly associated with Psychological Health. Within each factor, specific variables could be identified as the most associated, such as role conflict for constraints, self/work-esteem for resources, decision latitude for agency, and frequency of and time since trauma for trauma exposure. Our results therefore encourage us to take into account not only agency, but also past professional experiences in models for managing well-being. Providing police officers with social support at work, recognition, work meaning, fair proceedings and pay (organizational justice, especially for female and young officers), decision-making power (decision latitude), and minimizing conflictual information and procedures (role conflict) is of utmost importance. Officers with higher years of service, working in lower population cities, and who recently used their firearm, should be considered for trauma counseling. The degree of psychological demands of police officers should be regularly assessed, and reduced if possible. Reminders of support and integration in the force for officers with variables linked to a perceived lack of agency may be useful in their facing work challenges. Future integrative modeling research may be crucial to better understanding the relative contribution of each variable and their interplay in realistic settings, providing also a framework for measurement.
Q1

Pathological characterization of lung fibrosis in Sprague–Dawley rats treated with fluoro-edenite fibres by intrapleural injection
Tibaldi E., Gnudi F., Mandrioli D., Bruno C., Zona A., Fazzo L., Comba P.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
An increased incidence of pleural mesotheliomas in Biancavilla (Italy) was attributed to the environmental exposure to fluoro-edenite (FE). Results from the Ramazzini Institute (RI) in vivo long-term study confirmed the evidence that exposure to FE fibres is correlated with an increase of malignant pleural mesotheliomas in Sprague–Dawley rats. Recently asbestosis-like features were substantiated in Biancavilla residents without known occupational exposures. Aim of this work was to establish whether FE induce lung fibrosis with a pathogenetic mechanism similar to other asbestiform fibres. Original slides from the RI study were systematically re-examined to characterize the FE-induced lesions. Quantitative analysis of lung fibrosis was assessed following the Ashcroft method. Immunohistochemical analysis of protein involved in fibrotic responses and histochemical staining for FE-fibres identification were performed. Like asbestos, FE caused fibrotic lesions, pleural plaques or nodules and mesotheliomas. A significant increase of lung fibrosis (p < 0.001) was observed in the FE-treated groups compared to untreated controls. In the fibrotic responses to FE, vimentin was the most expressed protein, followed by collagen-I and alpha-SMA. Finally, ferruginous bodies, characterized by iron deposits and ferritin expression, were observed in FE-induced lesions. This study confirmed that FE exposure promotes the onset of fibrotic lesions at pleural level, as fibrous plaques or nodules and fibrosis, through a mechanism similar to other form of asbestos. These results combined with epidemiological study reported in Biancavilla residents, corroborate the need to promote health and epidemiological surveillance plans of respiratory diseases in population living in FE contaminated sites.
Q1

Retention of nickel, cobalt and chromium in skin at conditions mimicking intense hand hygiene practices using water, soap, and hand-disinfectant in vitro
Vilela L., Schenk L., Julander A., Midander K.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased hand hygiene practices using water, soap and hand disinfectants, became prevalent, particularly among frontline workers. This study investigates the impact of these practices on the skin’s ability to retain the allergenic metals nickel, cobalt, and chromium. The study constitutes three parts: (I) creating an impaired skin barrier, (II) exposing treated and untreated skin to nickel alone, and (III) in co-exposure with cobalt and chromium.
Methods
Using full-thickness skin from stillborn piglets, in vitro experiments were conducted to assess retention of metals in skin at conditions mimicking intense hand hygiene practices. Treatment of skin with varying concentrations of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), to impair its barrier integrity was assessed. This was followed by exposure of treated and untreated skin to the metals, that were dissolved in Milli-Q water, 0.5% SLS, and ethanol respectively.
Results
Results showed that pre-treatment with 5% SLS impaired the skin barrier with regards to the measure of trans epidermal water loss (TEWL). Metal amounts retained in the skin were generally higher in treated than untreated skin. The highest amounts of metal retained in skin were observed for exposure to nickel in ethanol. Co-exposure to nickel, cobalt, and chromium in 0.5% SLS resulted in the highest amounts of total metal retention.
Conclusions
The in vitro findings highlight the increased risk of metal retention in skin due to an impaired barrier. The SLS concentration used in the current study corresponds to those used in many hand hygiene products. Hence, occupational settings with frequent exposure to water, soap and disinfectants need to consider protective measures not only for the irritant exposures themselves but also simultaneous exposure to allergenic metals.
Q1

Long-term course and factors influencing work ability and return to work in post-COVID patients 12 months after inpatient rehabilitation
Müller K., Poppele I., Ottiger M., Wastlhuber A., Weber R., Stegbauer M., Schlesinger T.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in restoring work ability and facilitating the reintegration of post-COVID patients into the workforce. The impact of rehabilitation on work ability and return to work (RTW) of post-COVID patients remains poorly understood. This study was conducted to assess the work ability and RTW of post-COVID patients before rehabilitation and 12 months after rehabilitation and to identify physical and neuropsychological health factors influencing RTW 12 months after rehabilitation.
Methods
This longitudinal observational study included 114 post-COVID patients with work-related SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent inpatient post-COVID rehabilitation with indicative focus on pulmonology and/or psychotraumatology (interval between date of SARS-CoV-2 infection and start of rehabilitation: M = 412.90 days). Employment status, work ability, and the subjective prognosis of employment (SPE) scale were assessed before rehabilitation (T1) and 12 months after rehabilitation (T4). The predictors analysed at T4 were functional exercise capacity, physical activity, subjective physical and mental health status, fatigue, depression, and cognitive function. Longitudinal analyses were performed via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Logistic and linear regression analyses identified predictors of work ability and return to work (RTW), whereas mediation analyses examined the relationships between these predictors and work ability.
Results
At T4, the median of WAI total score indicated poor work ability, which significantly worsened over time (p < 0.001; r = 0.484). The SPE scale significantly increased from T1 to T4 (p = 0.022, r = -0.216). A total of 48.6% of patients had returned to work 12 months after rehabilitation. Fatigue was identified as the main predictor of reduced work ability and RTW, with each unit increase in fatigue severity decreasing the odds of RTW by 3.1%. In addition, physical capacity and subjective health status were significant predictors of perceived work ability.
Conclusions
The findings highlight the significant challenges that post-COVID patients face in regaining work ability and achieving successful RTW 12 months after rehabilitation. Fatigue appears to be an important predictor of work ability and RTW. To optimize recovery and enhance both biopsychosocial health and work ability, it is crucial to develop and implement personalised interventions that address fatigue, improve physical capacity, and support mental health.
Trial registration
This study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under DRKS00022928.
Q1

Associations between job demand-control-support and high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden: a cross-sectional study
Christiansen F., Gynning B.E., Lashari A., Zuberbühler J.P., Johansson G., Brulin E.
Q1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The knowledge about job demands, control, and support, and their potential associations with burnout risk among physicians in Sweden, is limited. This study aimed to explore (i) factors of the JobDemand-Control-Support (J-DCS) model across different groups of physicians in Sweden, (ii) their association with high burnout risk, and (iii) the potential buffering impact of job control and support.
Methods
Cross-sectional data from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Health in Healthcare Survey (LOHHCS) study cohort was used. In 2021, a total of 2032 respondents submitted questionnaire data comprising J-DCS measures (i.e., job demands, workplace control and task-level control, and social support from peers and managers). Burnout risk was measured using the Burnout Assessment Tool. Binary logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between the J-DCS variables and high burnout risk. Interaction analysis was performed to explore any moderation of the associations.
Results
Job demands were significantly associated with increased odds of high burnout risk (odds ratio (OR) 2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91–3.84. Workplace control (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.35–0.71) and peer support (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48–0.77) were significantly associated with reduced odds of high burnout risk. The interaction analysis showed no significant moderation of the association between job demands and high burnout risk by either peer support or workplace control, and no buffering impact was found.
Conclusion
Job demands were associated with high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden. Although workplace control and peer support had inverse associations with high burnout risk, no moderation or buffering impact on the association between job demands and high burnout risk was found. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these associations.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
871 citations, 10.85%
|
|
Journal of Services Marketing
250 citations, 3.11%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
249 citations, 3.1%
|
|
Sustainability
217 citations, 2.7%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
198 citations, 2.47%
|
|
Journal of Service Management
180 citations, 2.24%
|
|
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
116 citations, 1.44%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
104 citations, 1.3%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
102 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
91 citations, 1.13%
|
|
International Journal of Bank Marketing
84 citations, 1.05%
|
|
European Journal of Marketing
82 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
70 citations, 0.87%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
68 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
59 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Journal of Service Research
55 citations, 0.69%
|
|
International Journal of Consumer Studies
55 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Psychology and Marketing
52 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
51 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Service Business
49 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
46 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Marketing Intelligence and Planning
45 citations, 0.56%
|
|
TQM Journal
41 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
40 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
39 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
37 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Australasian Marketing Journal
35 citations, 0.44%
|
|
SAGE Open
31 citations, 0.39%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
30 citations, 0.37%
|
|
International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences
30 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
30 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Forum Dienstleistungsmanagement
30 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Strategic Marketing
28 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Product and Brand Management
27 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Analytics
27 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Marketing
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Heliyon
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
24 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Electronic Markets
24 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Current Issues in Tourism
24 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
24 citations, 0.3%
|
|
British Food Journal
24 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Management
24 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
23 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
23 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Technology in Society
22 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Relationship Marketing
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Vacation Marketing
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Information Management
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Management Decision
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Tourism Management
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
20 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism
19 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Knowledge Management
19 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
19 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Financial Services Marketing
19 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Public Management Review
19 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Marketing for Higher Education
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
European Business Review
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Current Psychology
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Behavioral Sciences
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
18 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Business Process Management Journal
17 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Services Marketing Quarterly
17 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Internet Research
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Benchmarking
16 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Total Quality Management and Business Excellence
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Kybernetes
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Production Planning and Control
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
European Management Journal
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Market Research
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Tourism Management Perspectives
14 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Global Business Review
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Travel Research
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Promotion Management
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Management Research Review
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEEE Access
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
ITM Web of Conferences
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Marketing Theory
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Information Technology and People
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Innovative Marketing
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Communications
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cornell Hospitality Quarterly
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Administrative Sciences
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
Emerald
2839 citations, 35.36%
|
|
Elsevier
1346 citations, 16.76%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
935 citations, 11.65%
|
|
Springer Nature
782 citations, 9.74%
|
|
MDPI
410 citations, 5.11%
|
|
SAGE
341 citations, 4.25%
|
|
Wiley
319 citations, 3.97%
|
|
IGI Global
172 citations, 2.14%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
116 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
98 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
35 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
26 citations, 0.32%
|
|
EDP Sciences
25 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
23 citations, 0.29%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
21 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
19 citations, 0.24%
|
|
World Scientific
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
13 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
12 citations, 0.15%
|
|
JMIR Publications
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Human Kinetics
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AOSIS
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AIP Publishing
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
9 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOP Publishing
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IntechOpen
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Oxford University Press
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Association of Professional Managers in South Africa
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Japan Marketing Academy
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Gyandhara International Academic Publications
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Annual Reviews
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
SciELO
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
CAIRN
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Stowarzyszenie Menedzerow Jakosci i Produkcji
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Intellect
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Marketing Association
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Quality
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Management
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tongji University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Expert Projects Publishing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editura Economica
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
BMJ
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Franco Angeli
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The University of Jordan
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society of Marketing and Distribution
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
University of Warsaw
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Index Copernicus
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Behaviormetric Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institut za Istrazivanja I Projektovanja u Privredi
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Asian Exercise and Sport Science Association
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Sumy State University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
University of Minnesota
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Ain Shams University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Academic Journals
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
ASME International
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Publishing House Finance and Credit
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Publishing House Science
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
OpenEdition
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
State University of Management
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Bristol University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Kansei Engineering
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Tech Science Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
OU Scientific Route
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Compuscript, Ltd.
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Hans Publishers
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Publishing organizations
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
Monash University
7 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
6 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
6 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Curtin University
5 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Newcastle University
5 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Karlstad University
4 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
4 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Auckland
4 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Adelaide
4 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Griffith University
4 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Canberra
4 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Valencia
4 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Indore
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Massey University
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Western Australia
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Murdoch University
3 publications, 0.77%
|
|
American University of Sharjah
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Fudan University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Ghent University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Gävle
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Stockholm School of Economics
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Soochow University (Taipei)
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Providence University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Salerno
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Deakin University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of South Australia
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Tasmania
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Southern Queensland
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Hanyang University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Inha University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Hongik University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Porto
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Fordham University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Houston
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Al Akhawayn University
2 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Abu Dhabi University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Ozyegin University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Jawaharlal Nehru University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Hyderabad
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Jammu
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Hamirpur
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Shri Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal's Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Lahore University of Management Sciences
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Tiruchirappalli
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Amritsar
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
RMIT Vietnam
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Mazandaran
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Tsinghua University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Zhejiang University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Beihang University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Manipal Academy of Higher Education
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Istanbul Arel University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
University of Bayreuth
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Stockholm University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Southeast University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Lulea University of Technology
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Blekinge Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Aalto University
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
4 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Indore
3 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Massey University
3 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Griffith University
3 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
3 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Canberra
3 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Karlstad University
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Gävle
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Stockholm School of Economics
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Western Australia
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Deakin University
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Curtin University
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of South Australia
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Hanyang University
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Inha University
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Porto
2 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Abu Dhabi University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Jawaharlal Nehru University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Hyderabad
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Jammu
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Hamirpur
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Shri Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal's Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Lahore University of Management Sciences
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Tiruchirappalli
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Amritsar
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
RMIT Vietnam
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Mazandaran
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Zhejiang University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Manipal Academy of Higher Education
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Istanbul Arel University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Bayreuth
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Southeast University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Northeastern University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
South China Normal University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Basel
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Xiamen University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
American University of Beirut
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Dundee
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Lebanese American University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Hanken School of Economics
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Maastricht University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
National Taiwan University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Drexel University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Loughborough University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Anhui Polytechnic University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Fujian University of Technology
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Huaqiao University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Parma
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Magna Graecia University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Glasgow
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Shandong Technology and Business University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Roma Tre University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Canterbury
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
China Jiliang University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Adelaide
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Macquarie University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Murdoch University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Torrens University Australia
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Southern Queensland
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of the Sunshine Coast
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Bond University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cape Town
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Auburn University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Australia
|
Australia, 53, 13.55%
Australia
53 publications, 13.55%
|
China
|
China, 31, 7.93%
China
31 publications, 7.93%
|
USA
|
USA, 20, 5.12%
USA
20 publications, 5.12%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 15, 3.84%
United Kingdom
15 publications, 3.84%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 15, 3.84%
Spain
15 publications, 3.84%
|
India
|
India, 13, 3.32%
India
13 publications, 3.32%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 13, 3.32%
New Zealand
13 publications, 3.32%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 12, 3.07%
Germany
12 publications, 3.07%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 12, 3.07%
Sweden
12 publications, 3.07%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 9, 2.3%
Italy
9 publications, 2.3%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 8, 2.05%
Finland
8 publications, 2.05%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 1.28%
Belgium
5 publications, 1.28%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 1.02%
Portugal
4 publications, 1.02%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 4, 1.02%
Iraq
4 publications, 1.02%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 1.02%
Canada
4 publications, 1.02%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 1.02%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 1.02%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 0.77%
Netherlands
3 publications, 0.77%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 0.77%
Norway
3 publications, 0.77%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.77%
UAE
3 publications, 0.77%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 0.77%
Pakistan
3 publications, 0.77%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.77%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.77%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.51%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.51%
Greece
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 2, 0.51%
Cambodia
2 publications, 0.51%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.51%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.51%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.51%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.51%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.26%
France
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.26%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.26%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.26%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.26%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.26%
Iran
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.26%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.26%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.26%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.26%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.26%
Romania
1 publication, 0.26%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.26%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.26%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.26%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.26%
Japan
1 publication, 0.26%
|
Show all (11 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
Australia
|
Australia, 23, 12.5%
Australia
23 publications, 12.5%
|
China
|
China, 16, 8.7%
China
16 publications, 8.7%
|
India
|
India, 13, 7.07%
India
13 publications, 7.07%
|
USA
|
USA, 10, 5.43%
USA
10 publications, 5.43%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 7, 3.8%
Sweden
7 publications, 3.8%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 6, 3.26%
Germany
6 publications, 3.26%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 6, 3.26%
New Zealand
6 publications, 3.26%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 5, 2.72%
United Kingdom
5 publications, 2.72%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 2.72%
Italy
5 publications, 2.72%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 1.63%
Belgium
3 publications, 1.63%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 1.63%
Pakistan
3 publications, 1.63%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 1.63%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 1.63%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 1.09%
Portugal
2 publications, 1.09%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 1.09%
Spain
2 publications, 1.09%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 2, 1.09%
Cambodia
2 publications, 1.09%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 1.09%
Netherlands
2 publications, 1.09%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 1.09%
Turkey
2 publications, 1.09%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.54%
France
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.54%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.54%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.54%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.54%
Iran
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.54%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1, 0.54%
Canada
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.54%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.54%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.54%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.54%
UAE
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.54%
Romania
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.54%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.54%
Finland
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.54%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.54%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.54%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.54%
Japan
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Show all (3 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
1 profile journal article
Figueiredo Alcídio
1 publication,
27 citations
h-index: 1