Journal of Marketing Management
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
3.5
SJR
1.454
CiteScore
8.0
Categories
Marketing
Strategy and Management
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Years of issue
1985-1997, 2001, 2006, 2008-2025
journal names
Journal of Marketing Management
J MARKET MANAG-UK
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Marketing Management
(3988 citations)

Journal of Business Research
(1768 citations)

European Journal of Marketing
(1625 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Lancaster University
(47 publications)

Royal Holloway University of London
(45 publications)

University of Stirling
(39 publications)

Royal Holloway University of London
(19 publications)

Lancaster University
(11 publications)

University of Birmingham
(11 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 615
Q1

Continuous use of AI technology: the roles of trust and satisfaction
Lam T.
PurposeChat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), a chatbot with artificial intelligence (AI) technology, opens up new directions for innovation. However, the extent to which literature has not considered the trustworthiness and satisfaction of ChatGPT. Those are important elements leading to continuous use (CU). Particularly, this study investigates the use of the ChatGPT Translate function. Requirements for task-AI-technology fit, trust and satisfaction relevant to ChatGPT Translate are addressed in this study.Design/methodology/approachTask-technology fit (TTF) theory forms the theoretical lens to examine the influences of TTF, AI-tech trust and satisfaction on CU of AI technology. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection. Structural equation modeling was employed to test the research model.FindingsThe findings show task and technology characteristics have positive effects on task-AI-technology fit. Task-AI-technology fit has a positive effect on AI-tech trust, which in turn has a positive effect on the CU of AI technology. Finally, the level of CU of AI technology by users satisfied with its responses is higher than users dissatisfied with its responses.Originality/valueThe results have important theoretical and practical implications for academia and industry to devise strategies and policies on a free-to-use AI system.
Q1

Investigating the impact of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intention and word-of-mouth in S-commerce
Kakkar A., Kalia P., Panesar A., Sood R.
PurposeThis study investigates the impact of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intentions and word-of-mouth in S-commerce.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 1,162 respondents in India using a quantitative methodology and convenience sampling. The conceptual model and hypotheses were examined using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).FindingsThe findings illustrate that perceived value is influenced by quality, technology and trust. Comprehending perceived value is essential for influencing customers’ buying choices and their inclination to promote favorable word-of-mouth regarding S-commerce websites. In addition, system quality was the most significant predictor among the nine predictors of perceived value for S-commerce sites.Originality/valueThis study represents an initial investigation to elucidate the influence of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intentions and word-of-mouth behavior during Indian consumers’ transition to social commerce, thereby enabling marketers to enhance their business and customer retention strategies.
Q1

A behavioral intention model of Gen Z female’ health information behavior on social media
Afifi S., Bakti I.G., Yaman A., Sumaedi S.
PurposeThis study aims to develop and validate a behavioral intention model for understanding the health information behavior of Generation Z females on social media. The model integrates variables such as familiarity, e-health literacy, trust and altruistic motivation.Design/methodology/approachConducted in Indonesia, the online survey involved 516 active female Generation Z respondents (aged 17–26) seeking health information on social media in the past six months. Utilizing the partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM), the study employed Smart PLS Version 4.0 for rigorous model validation and hypothesis testing in two stages: measurement and structural model analyses. This encompassed evaluating reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity.FindingsResults indicate that familiarity, e-health literacy, trust and altruistic motivation significantly influence the health information behavior of Generation Z females on social media. Furthermore, both familiarity and e-health literacy positively impact trust in social media as a reliable health information source. The study explores theoretical, managerial and policy implications.Originality/valueSocial media has become a crucial platform for health-related information, particularly among Generation Z females. Despite this, there is a significant research gap in the behavioral intention model for Generation Z females’ health information behavior on social media. This study introduces a unique information behavioral intention model shedding light on this behavior.
Q1

Understanding the role of privacy issues in AIoT device adoption within smart homes: an integrated model of privacy calculus and technology acceptance
Liang S., Shi C.
PurposeThe proliferation of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) devices has introduced notable privacy concerns, influencing user adoption and trust. This study integrates privacy calculus theory with the technology acceptance model to analyze how privacy risk perception affects users’ intentions to adopt and continue using AIoT devices.Design/methodology/approachA research model was developed and validated using data from 313 AIoT users. Findings indicate that perceived usefulness and ease of use significantly enhance users’ trust in AIoT devices. Additionally, prior privacy experiences and privacy knowledge amplify users’ privacy concerns.FindingsPrivacy risk perception and concerns reduce trust in AIoT devices but do not significantly deter continued usage intentions, highlighting a “privacy paradox” where functionality and convenience outweigh privacy concerns. Future research is encouraged to examine user attitudes across diverse demographics and controlled settings to gain deeper insights into privacy perceptions and behaviors toward AIoT.Originality/valueThese findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of AIoT adoption dynamics and offer practical implications for designing privacy-conscious AIoT applications.
Q1

Google Discover data-driven study of user activity on e-commerce platforms
Strzelecki A., Rizun M.
PurposeThis research focuses on the analysis of the recommendation algorithms employed by Google Discover, utilizing data from two e-commerce platforms operating in Poland.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses the information obtained from Google Search Console in a time span of 17 months. The examination of Google Discover focuses on the number of displays, clicks and click-through ratio, from the viewpoints of content publishers and web users.FindingsThe results suggest that user engagement positively influences a website’s efficiency in Google Discover, yet the algorithm also considers variables such as the popularity of similar content on other websites, user location and content update frequency. Thus, a website may be excluded from Discover despite a substantial click count.Originality/valueThere is a lack of studies on how Google Discover is perceived by users based on real data. We offer a quantitative perspective, which has not yet been done. This study offers an overview of the history and evolution of Google Discovery, an overview of data we used to show the perception of the service, and two unique perspectives on recommender service, users and publishers.
Q1

A riot of blooms begins to dazzle the eye: cognitive behavior with multimodal discourse during usefulness judgments of health information
Chen J., Zhang L.
PurposeAs the two sides of the same coin, usefulness and usability have emerged as pivotal research themes in user experience field. This study compares cognitive effort and cognitive resource allocation strategy across documents varying perceived usefulness and then across documents with different objective usability (unimodal vs multimodal discourses).Design/methodology/approachA controlled user study of four identifying tasks related to public health epidemics was conducted to collect data, including document usefulness as perceived by participants, presentation modes of the document and gaze behaviors on each document.FindingsUsefulness and modality discourse impact cognitive effort and resource allocation strategy in health information search. In useless health documents, spatial encoding resource spending increased significantly with multimodal discourse, and a spatial browsing strategy with an evident exploratory feature was applied; while in useful documents, including low-useful and high-useful, both spatial and information encoding resource spending increased significantly with multimodal discourse, and an information processing strategy with an evident comprehensive feature was applied. Notably, multimodal discourse failed to enhance decision-making effectiveness. Furthermore, in useful documents, the interaction effect of the presentation mode of useful information and multimodal discourse on cognitive effort followed an inverted U-shape pattern.Originality/valueThis paper sheds new light on the interaction effect of usefulness and usability on cognitive effort and resource allocation strategy, highlighting its significance in cognitive effort detecting for multimodal discourse and improving effectiveness and efficacy of health information identification by optimizing information presentation mode design.
Q1

Consumer response to OTT subscription promotions in Taiwan: a prospective theoretical perspective
Chen Y., Han H., Hsiao W.
PurposeThis article investigates the impact of consumers’ promotion strategies on the effectiveness of promotional campaigns for subscribing to Over-the-Top (OTT) streaming services, from a prospective theoretical perspective. Additionally, it explores the moderating effects of platform type and subscriber type on promotion strategies in the context of OTT streaming services.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs an experimental design to separately examine the promotion strategies of subscribers. The first part investigates the effect of promotion strategies on promotional effectiveness, regardless of platform and subscriber types, while the second part considers the moderating effects of both platform type and subscriber type on promotional effectiveness.FindingsThe analysis reveals that renewed subscribers exhibit a positive attitude toward incremental promotions and have stronger intentions to subscribe and recommend. Nonrenewed subscribers, in contrast, prefer discount promotions, demonstrating a positive attitude toward them and expressing higher intentions to subscribe and recommend.Originality/valueThis study applies prospect theory to OTT promotion strategies, uncovers the psychological drivers behind promotion effectiveness and examines the moderating role of subscriber type and platform type, thereby providing actionable insights to improve consumers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions.
Q1

Study on the model of factors influencing users’ willingness to participate in misinformation purification on the Weibo platform
Zhao Y., Li G., Mo Z.
PurposeTo explore the influence factors and pathways of users’ willingness to participate in the misinformation purification process on the Weibo platform. The findings of this study are expected to provide valuable insights that can enhance the self-purification mechanisms for misinformation on Weibo, thereby contributing to the effective misinformation control.Design/methodology/approachThe theoretical framework of the quantitative study is a conceptual model integrated with the theory of planned behavior (TPB), social exchange theory (SET) and co-dependency theory. This model was developed to elucidate the influence factors of users’ willingness to participate in the purification of misinformation on the Weibo platform, the conceptual model was tested and refined through questionnaire surveys, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to assess its validity and reliability.FindingsThe findings reveal that the attitude toward misinformation purification on the Weibo platform exerts the most significant positive influence on the willingness to engage in such activities. Within the context of this research, community involvement and reciprocity are identified as the factors that have the most substantial positive impact on users’ attitude toward misinformation purification. Conversely, risk perception does not demonstrate a significant influence on users’ attitude toward misinformation purification.Originality/valueTaking the Weibo platform as an example, this is a pioneering study on the investigation and mechanism of social media self-purification on misinformation and proposes a new perspective to improve the effectiveness of the social media self-purification mechanism from the perspective of focusing on user intention and motivation.
Q1

Chatbot research in the fields of business and information systems: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis
Li Z., Wu C., Li J., Yuan Q.
PurposeChatbots are increasingly embodied in business and IS contexts to enhance customer and user experience. Despite wide interest in chatbots among business and IS academics, surprisingly, there are no current comprehensive reviews to reveal the knowledge structure of chatbot research in such areas.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed a mixed-method approach that combines systematic review and bibliometric analysis to provide a comprehensive synthesis of chatbot research. The sample was obtained in December 2023 after searching across six databases: EBSCOhost, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Computer Society Digital Library.FindingsThis study reveals the major trend in publication trends, countries, article performance and cluster distribution of chatbot research. We also identify the key themes of chatbot research, which mainly focus on how users interact with chatbots and their consequences, such as users’ cognition and behavior. Moreover, several important research agendas have been discussed to address some limitations in the current chatbot research in business and IS fields.Originality/valueThe present review is one of the first attempts to systematically reveal the ongoing knowledge map of chatbots in business and IS fields, which makes important contributions and provides useful resources for future chatbot research and practice.
Q1

Examining generative AI user continuance intention based on the SOR model
Zhou T., Ma X.
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to examine generative artificial intelligence (AI) user continuance intention based on the stimulus-organism-response model.Design/methodology/approachWe adopted a mixed method of structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to conduct data analysis.FindingsThe results found that generative AI content quality (perceived personalization, perceived accuracy and perceived credibility) and system quality (perceived interactivity, perceived anthropomorphism and perceived intelligence) affect sense of empowerment and satisfaction, both of which further determine continuance intention.Originality/valueExtant research has identified the effect of flow, trust and parasocial interaction on generative AI user continuance, but it has seldom disclosed the internal decisional process of generative AI user continuance intention. This research tries to fill this gap, and the results enrich the extant research on generative AI user continuance.
Q1

The impact of emotional cues on the information-gathering willingness of paid knowledge users
Cao Y., Deng X.
PurposeThis study aims to explore the impact of emotional cues in knowledge product descriptions on users’ willingness to gather information. It specifically focuses on how different types of textual emotional cues, including heuristic cues like “emotional titles” and systematic cues like “emotional synopses,” influence users’ information-gathering willingness and examines the mediating role of emotional arousal in this process.Design/methodology/approachA conceptual model was developed by integrating the heuristic-systematic model with cue utilization theory. The experimental design employed knowledge product descriptions from the “Knowledge Column” section of the Zhihu platform. A controlled experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of varying emotional cues in these descriptions on participants’ willingness to gather information.FindingsThe study identified two types of emotional cues – heuristic cues, such as “emotional titles,” and systematic cues, such as “emotional synopses” – that significantly and positively influence users' information-gathering willingness. Additionally, emotional arousal was found to mediate the relationship between emotional cues and users’ willingness to gather information in the context of knowledge payments.Originality/valueThis study confirms that emotional cues in knowledge product descriptions, mediated by emotional arousal, can enhance the information-gathering willingness of knowledge payment users. The research deepens the theoretical exploration of information behavior among online knowledge payment users, providing valuable insights for knowledge producers on effectively leveraging emotional cues to attract potential customers as well as offering guidance for knowledge payment users in their information-gathering practices.
Q1

Motivating user engagement in online health Q&A communities: do contingent financial incentives matter?
He L., Huang Y., Li S., Zhou X.
PurposeUser engagement is critical for online health Q&A communities. Financial incentives, which vary across different communities and reward schemes, are expected to motivate such contribution behaviors. Even though financial incentives have been extensively examined in prior studies, the impact of newly designed contingent financial incentives of a new pay-for-answer reward scheme has not been empirically examined in any online health Q&A community. Given this research gap, our study aims to perform an exploratory investigation of the effects of contingent financial incentives on user engagement in terms of knowledge contribution and social interactions.Design/methodology/approachBased on expectancy-value theory and equity theory, a research model was developed to reflect the influences of contingent financial incentives on user engagement. A unique dataset was gathered from a large online health Q&A community utilizing this contingent financial incentive reward structure, and the Heckman selection model was applied using a two-step procedure to test these hypotheses. Possible endogeneity issues were also addressed in the robustness check.FindingsOur results demonstrate that the effect of contingent financial incentives on answer quantity and quality is quadratic. Additionally, our study reveals that this contingent financial incentive enhances both comment and emotional interactions among users.Originality/valueOur study enriches the literature on financial incentives, knowledge contribution and user engagement by revealing the nuanced effects of financial incentives within a novel pay-for-answer scheme. This study also offers significant implications for practitioners involved in online community incentive design.
Q1

Feedback from the younger generation on health information shared by their parents on WeChat: types, antecedents and consequences
Li X., Liu M., Song X., Zhu Q.
PurposeIn China, it is prevalent for parents to share health information on WeChat and receive feedback from their children. This study aims to investigate the feedback from younger generations regarding their parents’ health information sharing. It will examine the different types of feedback, explore the factors influencing it and analyze the outcomes that result from this feedback exchange.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical findings draw on the qualitative analysis using grounded theory. This study collects data from 34 participants (17 pairs of one young person and one parent) through in-depth interviews and WeChat chat records. Then, a theoretical model was developed through open, axial and selective coding.FindingsFeedback can be classified into five types: support, correction, perfunctoriness, ostracism and rejection as well as into “Affective-Behavioral-Cognitive” dimensions. Younger generations’ feedback types are influenced by a variety of factors, including information, emotion and individual and family-related factors. Each feedback type has distinct effects, such as altering older generations’ emotional and communication responses.Originality/valueThis pioneering study explores how younger generations in China perceive their parents’ health information sharing on social media. It highlights the importance of feedback in this context, providing actionable insights to enhance digital literacy among older adults, strengthen family bonds and enhance the spread of valuable and scientific health information online.
Q1

Does ChatGPT affect users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities?
Li G., Zhu M.X.
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the impact of ChatGPT on users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online question-and-answer (Q&A) communities based on social exchange theory and stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from a Chinese online Q&A community, and the difference-in-differences (DID) model was employed to verify the proposed hypotheses.FindingsThe results show that ChatGPT negatively impacts users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities, with variations observed across different knowledge domains.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt to examine the impact of ChatGPT on users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities. The findings provide valuable insights for community managers to develop strategies for mitigating the effects of ChatGPT on online Q&A communities.
Q1

Promoting health behavioral intention through short videos: roles of audiovisual cross-modal correspondence in health communication
Xu Y., Jiang T., Hu X., Tian H.
PurposeHealth short videos are serving as a powerful tool for encouraging individuals to actively adopt healthier behaviors. The sensory cues applied in these videos can be useful for engaging peripheral processing and enhancing attitudes. While previous research has examined the effects of various single cues, this study features a pioneering attempt to explore the roles of audiovisual cross-modal correspondence, encompassing multisensory cues perceived through different modalities, in health communication.Design/methodology/approachA 2 (color: warm/cool) × 2 (music tempo: fast/slow) between-subjects experiment was conducted to observe 120 participants’ responses to a health short video promoting eye health that was created using four different combinations of background color and background music tempo.FindingsIt was found that the congruent color–tempo pairings, that is blue & slow and orange & fast, led to more positive attitudes toward the videos than the incongruent pairings, that is blue & fast and orange & slow. The effect of cross-modal correspondence on attitude was fully mediated by processing fluency, with gender acting as a moderator between the two variables. Furthermore, individuals’ attitudes toward a short video positively influenced their health behavioral intentions.Originality/valueThese findings not only lend support to the theoretical framework of “multisensory cues-fluency-attitude-intention” chain for persuasion purposes but also have practical implications for creating effective health short videos.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
Journal of Marketing Management
3988 citations, 5.84%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
1768 citations, 2.59%
|
|
European Journal of Marketing
1625 citations, 2.38%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
1196 citations, 1.75%
|
|
Sustainability
1150 citations, 1.68%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
939 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Marketing Theory
860 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Marketing Intelligence and Planning
799 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Journal of Product and Brand Management
767 citations, 1.12%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
645 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Journal of Strategic Marketing
626 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Journal of Brand Management
625 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
596 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
538 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Journal of Services Marketing
529 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Psychology and Marketing
512 citations, 0.75%
|
|
International Journal of Consumer Studies
510 citations, 0.75%
|
|
International Journal of Bank Marketing
498 citations, 0.73%
|
|
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
485 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
461 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
445 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
378 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Qualitative Market Research
364 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Australasian Marketing Journal
350 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Macromarketing
336 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
325 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
307 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Marketing
295 citations, 0.43%
|
|
International Marketing Review
284 citations, 0.42%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
281 citations, 0.41%
|
|
British Food Journal
268 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Consumption Markets and Culture
259 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Communications
238 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
228 citations, 0.33%
|
|
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research
225 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Social Marketing
224 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Management Decision
211 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
211 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Service Management
207 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Tourism Management
201 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Political Marketing
197 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
195 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice
190 citations, 0.28%
|
|
International Journal of Advertising
189 citations, 0.28%
|
|
International Journal of Market Research
186 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition)
184 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing
181 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Historical Research in Marketing
174 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Corporate Communications
172 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing
169 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Recherche et Applications en Marketing
164 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
163 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
162 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Relationship Marketing
160 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Internet Research
157 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Promotion Management
157 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
155 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing
154 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Place Branding and Public Diplomacy
148 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
139 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Place Management and Development
135 citations, 0.2%
|
|
AMS Review
135 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Travel Research
133 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
132 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
130 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Service Research
126 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
123 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of International Consumer Marketing
121 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
121 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Business Review
120 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
120 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Optimistic Marketing in Challenging Times: Serving Ever-Shifting Customer Needs
117 citations, 0.17%
|
|
European Business Review
116 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing
115 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Information Management
114 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Advertising
110 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing
109 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
109 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SAGE Open
109 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Affairs
106 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Corporate Reputation Review
106 citations, 0.16%
|
|
European Management Journal
104 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Current Issues in Tourism
102 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Marketing for Higher Education
102 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Financial Services Marketing
101 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Analytics
100 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Interactive Marketing
99 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Vacation Marketing
99 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Research
98 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Young Consumers
97 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Marketing
94 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship
94 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
93 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Global Marketing
93 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Business Opportunities
92 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of International Marketing
90 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship
90 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Destination Marketing and Management
88 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Annals of Tourism Research
86 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Social Marketing Quarterly
84 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
|
|
Emerald
14997 citations, 21.96%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
13128 citations, 19.22%
|
|
Elsevier
10113 citations, 14.81%
|
|
Springer Nature
6576 citations, 9.63%
|
|
SAGE
4666 citations, 6.83%
|
|
Wiley
4151 citations, 6.08%
|
|
IGI Global
2397 citations, 3.51%
|
|
MDPI
2114 citations, 3.1%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
835 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
664 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
590 citations, 0.86%
|
|
CAIRN
284 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
266 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
241 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Oxford University Press
198 citations, 0.29%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
178 citations, 0.26%
|
|
SciELO
177 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
157 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Marketing Association
154 citations, 0.23%
|
|
World Scientific
147 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
105 citations, 0.15%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
96 citations, 0.14%
|
|
EDP Sciences
80 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
79 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
76 citations, 0.11%
|
|
AOSIS
72 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Human Kinetics
70 citations, 0.1%
|
|
JMIR Publications
66 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
64 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Japan Marketing Academy
63 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
59 citations, 0.09%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
57 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
54 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOP Publishing
50 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Advertising Research Foundation
44 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IntechOpen
44 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Academy of Management
41 citations, 0.06%
|
|
OpenEdition
40 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
40 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
36 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AIP Publishing
35 citations, 0.05%
|
|
International Management Development Association
33 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
31 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japan Society of Marketing and Distribution
30 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
28 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
27 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
27 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science Alert
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
22 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
22 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Editura Economica
21 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
20 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
20 citations, 0.03%
|
|
F1000 Research
19 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Accounting Association
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOS Press
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brazilian Administration Review
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Warsaw
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Intellect
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bristol University Press
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Lavoisier
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association of Professional Managers in South Africa
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
BMJ
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EJournal Publishing
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Quality
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Gyandhara International Academic Publications
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Transportation and Logistics
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidad Icesi
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Academic Journals
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korean Society for Clothing Industry
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korea Contents Association
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mendel University Press
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of California Press
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Index Copernicus
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Wageningen Academic Publishers
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Recreation and Park Association
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
9 citations, 0.01%
|
|
School of Economics and Business in Sarajevo
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tongji University Press
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Opatija
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Inovatus Usluge d.o.o.
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
Lancaster University
47 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
45 publications, 1.84%
|
|
University of Stirling
39 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Birmingham
33 publications, 1.35%
|
|
University of Ulster
32 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Nottingham
25 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
25 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Griffith University
24 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
24 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
23 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Leicester
23 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Liverpool
22 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Cardiff University
21 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Loughborough University
18 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Melbourne
18 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Sheffield
18 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Bath
18 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Bradford
18 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Durham University
17 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Warwick
17 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Aalto University
16 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
16 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Monash University
16 publications, 0.65%
|
|
York University
16 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Stockholm University
15 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
15 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Coventry University
15 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
14 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Manchester
14 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Otago
14 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Canterbury
14 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Swansea University
14 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Brunel University London
13 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Deakin University
13 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Curtin University
13 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of York
13 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Hull
13 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Université de Lille
13 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Aston University
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Wollongong
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of South Australia
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
De Montfort University
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Texas Tech University
12 publications, 0.49%
|
|
King's College London
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Kingston University
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Western Australia
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Newcastle University
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Bournemouth University
11 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Auckland
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Queensland
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Leeds
10 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
9 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Glasgow
9 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
9 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of the West of England
9 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Cranfield University
9 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Macquarie University
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Surrey
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Huddersfield
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Salford
8 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Lund University
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of New South Wales
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Aarhus University
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Adelaide
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Keele University
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of East Anglia
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University College Dublin
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Bangor University
7 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Ghent University
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Helsinki
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Southampton
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Massey University
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Arizona State University
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Dublin City University
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Université Paris Dauphine-PSL
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
London Metropolitan University
6 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Karlstad University
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Oxford
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Southern California
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Sydney
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Glasgow Caledonian University
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Tasmania
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
5 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
19 publications, 4.75%
|
|
University of Birmingham
11 publications, 2.75%
|
|
Lancaster University
11 publications, 2.75%
|
|
University of York
9 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
8 publications, 2%
|
|
University of Stirling
8 publications, 2%
|
|
Aalto University
7 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Cardiff University
7 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
6 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
6 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of South Australia
6 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Newcastle University
6 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Leicester
6 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Université de Lille
6 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Helsinki
5 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
5 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Liverpool
5 publications, 1.25%
|
|
King's College London
5 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
5 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Western Australia
5 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Wollongong
5 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Bath
5 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Manchester
4 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Glasgow
4 publications, 1%
|
|
Massey University
4 publications, 1%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
4 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Bristol
4 publications, 1%
|
|
York University
4 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Ulster
4 publications, 1%
|
|
Coventry University
4 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Huddersfield
4 publications, 1%
|
|
Ghent University
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Lund University
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Stockholm University
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Nottingham
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Melbourne
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Griffith University
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Auburn University
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
De Montfort University
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Texas Tech University
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Université Paris Dauphine-PSL
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Paris Sciences et Lettres
3 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Lorraine
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Tampere University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Umeå University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Karlstad University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Durham University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Brunel University London
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Lapland
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Aarhus University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Kingston University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Fu Jen Catholic University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Otago
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Adelaide
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Curtin University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Tasmania
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of the Sunshine Coast
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
New Jersey Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Dublin City University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Namur
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Eastern Michigan University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Koblenz University of Applied Sciences
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Northumbria University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Porto
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Coimbra
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Sheffield
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Granada
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Ramon Llull University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Surrey
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University College Dublin
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Bournemouth University
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Tallinn University of Technology
2 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Prince Sultan University
1 publication, 0.25%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.25%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
1 publication, 0.25%
|
|
Ege University
1 publication, 0.25%
|
|
American University of Sharjah
1 publication, 0.25%
|
|
Abdullah Gul University
1 publication, 0.25%
|
|
Dokuz Eylül University
1 publication, 0.25%
|
|
Ozyegin University
1 publication, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 706, 28.83%
United Kingdom
706 publications, 28.83%
|
USA
|
USA, 249, 10.17%
USA
249 publications, 10.17%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 215, 8.78%
Australia
215 publications, 8.78%
|
France
|
France, 117, 4.78%
France
117 publications, 4.78%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 66, 2.69%
Canada
66 publications, 2.69%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 55, 2.25%
New Zealand
55 publications, 2.25%
|
China
|
China, 51, 2.08%
China
51 publications, 2.08%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 48, 1.96%
Ireland
48 publications, 1.96%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 44, 1.8%
Finland
44 publications, 1.8%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 44, 1.8%
Sweden
44 publications, 1.8%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 35, 1.43%
Germany
35 publications, 1.43%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 30, 1.22%
Italy
30 publications, 1.22%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 22, 0.9%
Denmark
22 publications, 0.9%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 22, 0.9%
Spain
22 publications, 0.9%
|
India
|
India, 20, 0.82%
India
20 publications, 0.82%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 19, 0.78%
Netherlands
19 publications, 0.78%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 18, 0.73%
Belgium
18 publications, 0.73%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 17, 0.69%
Portugal
17 publications, 0.69%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 16, 0.65%
Brazil
16 publications, 0.65%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 13, 0.53%
Turkey
13 publications, 0.53%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 10, 0.41%
Austria
10 publications, 0.41%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 9, 0.37%
Switzerland
9 publications, 0.37%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 8, 0.33%
Chile
8 publications, 0.33%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 8, 0.33%
South Africa
8 publications, 0.33%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 7, 0.29%
Greece
7 publications, 0.29%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 7, 0.29%
Norway
7 publications, 0.29%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 6, 0.24%
Singapore
6 publications, 0.24%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 0.2%
Indonesia
5 publications, 0.2%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.2%
UAE
5 publications, 0.2%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.2%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.2%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 5, 0.2%
Thailand
5 publications, 0.2%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 4, 0.16%
Cyprus
4 publications, 0.16%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.16%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.16%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 4, 0.16%
Monaco
4 publications, 0.16%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.16%
Poland
4 publications, 0.16%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 3, 0.12%
Estonia
3 publications, 0.12%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.12%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.12%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.12%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.12%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.12%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.12%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 0.12%
Japan
3 publications, 0.12%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.08%
Russia
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.08%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.08%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.08%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.08%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.08%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.08%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.08%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.08%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.08%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.08%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.04%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.04%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.04%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.04%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.04%
Israel
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.04%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.04%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.04%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 1, 0.04%
Libya
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.04%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.04%
Malta
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.04%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Reunion
|
Reunion, 1, 0.04%
Reunion
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.04%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Show all (35 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 117, 29.25%
United Kingdom
117 publications, 29.25%
|
USA
|
USA, 70, 17.5%
USA
70 publications, 17.5%
|
France
|
France, 51, 12.75%
France
51 publications, 12.75%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 46, 11.5%
Australia
46 publications, 11.5%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 20, 5%
Canada
20 publications, 5%
|
China
|
China, 15, 3.75%
China
15 publications, 3.75%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 15, 3.75%
Finland
15 publications, 3.75%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 14, 3.5%
Germany
14 publications, 3.5%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 14, 3.5%
Ireland
14 publications, 3.5%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 14, 3.5%
Sweden
14 publications, 3.5%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 11, 2.75%
Portugal
11 publications, 2.75%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 11, 2.75%
Spain
11 publications, 2.75%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 11, 2.75%
Italy
11 publications, 2.75%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 10, 2.5%
Brazil
10 publications, 2.5%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 9, 2.25%
Denmark
9 publications, 2.25%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 9, 2.25%
New Zealand
9 publications, 2.25%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 8, 2%
Belgium
8 publications, 2%
|
India
|
India, 6, 1.5%
India
6 publications, 1.5%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 6, 1.5%
Turkey
6 publications, 1.5%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 5, 1.25%
Switzerland
5 publications, 1.25%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 4, 1%
Chile
4 publications, 1%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 0.75%
Netherlands
3 publications, 0.75%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 0.5%
Estonia
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.5%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.5%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.5%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 2, 0.5%
Monaco
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.5%
Norway
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.5%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.5%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.5%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.5%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.5%
Japan
2 publications, 0.5%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.25%
Austria
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.25%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.25%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.25%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.25%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.25%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.25%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.25%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.25%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.25%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.25%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.25%
UAE
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.25%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.25%
Poland
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.25%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.25%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.25%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.25%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.25%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.25%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.25%
|
Show all (21 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
1 profile journal article
Ouvrein Gaëlle
28 publications,
294 citations
h-index: 7