Southeastern Naturalist
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q4
WOS
Q4
Impact factor
0.6
SJR
0.224
CiteScore
1.2
Categories
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Years of issue
2002-2025
journal names
Southeastern Naturalist
SOUTHEAST NAT
Top-3 citing journals
Southeastern Naturalist
(940 citations)

PLoS ONE
(219 citations)

Journal of Wildlife Management
(215 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Florida
(18 publications)

Texas A&M University
(14 publications)

North Carolina State University
(9 publications)

Texas A&M University
(5 publications)

Clemson University
(3 publications)

University of Florida
(3 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 373
Q2

A Systematic Investigation of Beam Losses and Position-Reconstruction Techniques Measured with a Novel oBLM at CLEAR
King M., Benitez S., Christie A., Effinger E., Esteban J., Farabolini W., Gilardi A., Korysko P., Meyer J.M., Salvachua B., Welsch C.P., Wolfenden J.
Optical Beam-Loss Monitors (oBLMs) allow for cost-efficient and spatially continuous measurements of beam losses at accelerator facilities. A standard oBLM consists of several tens of metres of optical fibre aligned parallel to a beamline, coupled to photosensors at either or both ends. Using the timing information from loss signals, the loss positions can be reconstructed. This paper presents a novel oBLM system recently deployed at the CERN Linear Electron Accelerator for Research (CLEAR). Multiple methods of extracting timing and position information from measured waveforms with silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) and photomultiplier tubes (PMT) are investigated. For this installation, the optimal approach is determined to be applying a constant fraction discrimination (CFD) on the upstream readout. The position resolution is found to be similar for the tested SiPM and PMT. This work has resulted in the development of a user interface to aid operations by visualising the beam losses and their positions in real time.
Q2

Development of TR-19 Cyclotron Parameter Settings for Fully Automated Production of Radiometals with Applications in Nuclear Medicine
Crăciun L.Ș., Eșanu T.R., Leonte R., Schubert H.A., Erhan R.V., Niculae D.
At the Radiopharmaceutical Research Center (CCR) of the Horia Hulubei National Institute for R&D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH), we operate a TR-19 cyclotron for radio isotope production. To broaden our spectrum of radioisotopes with applications in nuclear medicine, we add a new external beam line towards a state-of-the-art solid target station. Besides practical experience with the implementation of the Comecer ALCEO metal solid targetry system, a new, more efficient way of tuning the beam onto the target and the design of a dedicated neutron local layered shielding are presented.
Q2

Feasibility Study of a PET Detector with a Wavelength-Shifting Fiber Readout
Georgadze A.S.
We designed and evaluated the performance of a high-resolution large-area detector for positron emission tomography (PET) based on a crystal assembly readout using wavelength-shifting (WLS) fibers, offering a cost-effective alternative to the direct readout of monolithic crystals with photodetectors. The considered detector geometries were made up of 4 × 4 assemblies of LuY2SiO5:Ce (LYSO) crystal scintillators, each with surface area of 50 × 50 mm2 and thickness of 7 or 15 mm, which were optically coupled together using optical adhesive. The crystal assembly was coupled with square cross-sections of orthogonal wavelength-shifting (WLS) fibers placed on the top and bottom of the assembly. To evaluate the characteristics of the novel detector, we used GEANT4 to perform optical photon transport in the crystal assembly and WLS fibers. The simulation results show that best position resolution achieved was 1.6 ± 0.4 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) and 4.2 ± 0.6 mm full width at tenth maximum (FWTM) for the crystal thickness of 7 mm and 1.7 ± 0.4 mm FWHM and 6.0 ± 0.6 mm FWTM for the crystal thickness of 15 mm. Compared with a direct photosensor readout, WLS fibers can drastically reduce the number of photosensors required while covering a larger sensitive detection area. In the proposed detector design, 2N photodetectors are used to cover the same image area instead of N2 with a direct readout. This design allows for the development of a compact detector with an expanded effective field of view and reduced cost.
Q2

Design and Simulation of a Muon Detector Using Wavelength-Shifting Fiber Readouts for Border Security
Georgadze A.S.
Cosmic ray muon tomography is a promising method for the non-invasive inspection of shipping containers and trucks. It leverages the highly penetrating cosmic muons and their interactions with various materials to generate three-dimensional images of large and dense objects, such as inter-modal shipping containers, which are typically opaque to conventional X-ray radiography techniques. One of the key tasks of customs and border security is verifying shipping container declarations to prevent illegal trafficking, and muon tomography offers a viable solution for this purpose. Common imaging methods using muons rely on data analysis of either muon scattering or absorption–transmission. We design a compact muon tomography system with dimensions of 3 × 3 × 3 m3, consisting of 2D position-sensitive detectors. These detectors include plastic scintillators, wavelength-shifting (WLS) fibers, and SiPMs. Through light transport modeling with GEANT4, we demonstrate that the proposed detector design—featuring 1 m × 1 m scintillator plates with 2 mm2 square-shaped WLS fibers—can achieve a spatial resolution of approximately 0.7–1.0 mm. Through Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate that combining muon scattering and absorption data enables the rapid and accurate identification of cargo materials. In a smuggling scenario where tobacco is falsely declared as paper towel rolls, this combined analysis distinguishes the two with 3 σ confidence at a spatial resolution of 1 mm (FWHM) for the muon detector, achieving results within a scanning time of 40 s for a 20-foot shipping container.
Q2

A 3D Printed Air-Tight Cell Adaptable for Far-Infrared Reflectance, Optical Photothermal Infrared Spectroscopy, and Raman Spectroscopy Measurements
Paolone A., Celeste A., Di Pea M., Brutti S., Borondics F., Capitani F.
Material characterization and investigation are the basis for improving the performance of electrochemical devices. However, many compounds with electrochemical applications are sensitive to atmospheric gases and moisture; therefore, even their characterization should be performed in a controlled atmosphere. In some cases, it is impossible to execute such investigations in a glove box, and, therefore, in the present work, an air-tight 3D printed cell was developed that preserves samples in a controlled atmosphere while allowing spectroscopic measurements in reflectance geometry. Equipped with a cheap 1 mm thick CaF2 optical window or a more expensive 0.5 mm thick ZnS window, the cell was used for both optical photothermal infrared and Raman spectroscopy measures; imaging of the samples was also possible. The far-infrared range reflectance measurements were performed with a cell equipped with a diamond window.
Q2

Portable Arbitrary Pulse Generator for Driving Microcoils for Micromagnetic Neurostimulation
Bloom R.P., Saha R., Sanger Z., Low W.C., Netoff T.I., Wang J.
Micromagnetic stimulation (μMS) is a promising branch of neurostimulation but without some of the drawbacks of electrical stimulation. Microcoil (μcoil)-based magnetic stimulation uses small micrometer-sized coils that generate a time-varying magnetic field, which, as per Faraday’s Laws of Electromagnetic Induction, induces an electric field on a conductive surface. This method of stimulation has the advantage of not requiring electrical contact with the tissue; however, these μcoils are not easy to operate. Large currents are required to generate the required magnetic field. These large currents are too large for standard test equipment to provide, and additional power amplifiers are needed. To aid in the testing and development of micromagnetic stimulation devices, we have created a compact single-unit test setup for driving these devices called the µCoil Driver. This unit is designed to drive small inductive loads up to ±8 V at 5 A and 10 kHz.
Q2

A New Approach to Enhancing Radiation Hardness in Advanced Nuclear Radiation Detectors Subjected to Fast Neutrons
Vakili A., Farasat M., La Magna A., Italia M., Pancheri L.
Low-Gain Avalanche Diodes (LGADs) are critical sensors for the ATLAS and CMS timing detectors at the High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC), offering enhanced timing resolution with gain factors of 20 to 50. However, their radiation tolerance is hindered by the Acceptor Removal Phenomenon (ARP), which deactivates boron in the gain layer, reducing gain below the threshold for accurate timing. This study investigates the radiation hardness of thin, carbon-doped LGAD sensors developed by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) to address ARP-induced limitations. Active dopant profiles in the gain layer, junction, and bulk were measured using a Spreading Resistance Probe (SRP) profilometer, and the effects of annealing and neutron irradiation at fluences of 3 × 1014, 1 × 1015, and 3 × 1015 neq/cm2 (1 MeV equivalent) were analyzed. Low carbon dose rates showed minimal improvement due to enhanced deactivation, while higher doses improved radiation hardness, demonstrating a non-linear dose–response relationship. These findings highlight the potential of optimizing gain layers with high carbon doses and low-diffusion boron to extend LGAD lifetimes in high-radiation environments. Future research will refine carbon implantation strategies and explore alternative approaches to further enhance the radiation hardness of LGADs.
Q2

An Open-Frame Loading Stage for High-Resolution X-Ray CT
Plappert D., Schütz M., Ganzenmüller G.C., Fischer F., Campos M., Procz S., Fiederle M., Hiermaier S.
The utilisation of high-resolution in situ computed tomography (CT) in the (sub-)μm range is typically only viable in synchrotron facilities, as the deployment of a conventional loading stage in laboratory CTs with a cone beam source does not facilitate a corresponding geometric magnification. This publication presents a CT system with a novel in situ concept that allows spatial resolutions down to 0.5 μm, enabling the analysis of weakly absorbing materials capable of applying loads of up to 5 kN in both the compression and tension directions to the sample during the measurement. The necessity for a highly precise mechanical design to ensure successful measurements at magnifications approaching the theoretical limit makes the system’s development particularly demanding. The components employed are presented, along with the requisite considerations and methodologies. It can be demonstrated that the intended specifications with regard to precision and quality are met. The experimental results of a fibre-reinforced polymer demonstrate the system’s ability to detect matrix damage features below a single fibre diameter, thereby highlighting its potential for applications in materials science where traditional laboratory CTs are insufficient and synchrotron access is limited.
Q2

Acoustic Communication Among Smart Sensors: A Feasibility Study
Caruso P., da Rocha H., Espírito-Santo A., Paciello V., Salvado J.
Smart sensors and networks have spread worldwide over the past few decades. In the industry field, these concepts have found an increasing quantity of applications. The omnipresence of smart sensor networks and smart devices, especially in the industrial world, has contributed to the emergence of the concept of Industry 4.0. In a world where everything is interconnected, communication among smart devices is critical to technological development in the field of smart industry. To improve communication, many engineers and researchers implemented methods to standardize communication along the various levels of the ISO-OSI model, from hardware design to the implementation and standardization of different communication protocols. The objective of this paper is to study and implement an unconventional type of communication, exploiting acoustic wave propagation on metallic structures, starting from the state of the art, and highlighting the advantages and disadvantages found in existing literature, trying to overcome them and describing the progress beyond the state of the art. The proposed application for acoustic communication targets the field of smart industries, where implementing signal transmission via wireless or wired methods is challenging due to interference from the widespread presence of metallic structures. This study explores an innovative approach to acoustic communication, with a particular focus on the physical challenges related to acoustic wave propagation. Additionally, communication performance is examined in terms of noise rejection, analyzing the impact of injected acoustic noise on communication efficiency.
Q2

Assessing the Performance of Deep Learning Predictions for Dynamic Aperture of a Hadron Circular Particle Accelerator
Di Croce D., Giovannozzi M., Montanari C.E., Pieloni T., Redaelli S., Van der Veken F.F.
Understanding the concept of dynamic aperture provides essential insights into nonlinear beam dynamics, beam losses, and the beam lifetime in circular particle accelerators. This comprehension is crucial for the functioning of modern hadron synchrotrons like the CERN Large Hadron Collider and the planning of future ones such as the Future Circular Collider. The dynamic aperture defines the extent of the region in phase space where the trajectories of charged particles are bounded over numerous revolutions, the actual number being defined by the physical application. Traditional methods for calculating the dynamic aperture depend on computationally demanding numerical simulations, which require tracking over multiple turns of numerous initial conditions appropriately distributed in phase space. Prior research has shown the efficiency of a multilayer perceptron network in forecasting the dynamic aperture of the CERN Large Hadron Collider ring, achieving a remarkable speed-up of up to 200-fold compared to standard numerical tracking tools. Building on recent advancements, we conducted a comparative study of various deep learning networks based on BERT, DenseNet, ResNet and VGG architectures. The results demonstrate substantial enhancements in the prediction of the dynamic aperture, marking a significant advancement in the development of more precise and efficient surrogate models of beam dynamics.
Q2

A Review of the Multiple-Readout Concept and Its Application in an Integrally Active Calorimeter
Gatto C., Di Benedetto V., Mazzacane A.
A comprehensive multi-jet physics program is anticipated for experiments at future colliders. Key physics processes necessitate detectors that can distinguish signals from W and Z bosons and the Higgs boson. Typical examples include channels with W+W− or ZoZo pairs and processes involving new physics in those cases where neutral particles must be disentangled from charged ones due to the presence of W or Z bosons in their final states. Such a physics program demands calorimetric energy resolution at or beyond the limits of traditional calorimetric techniques. Multiple-readout calorimetry, which aims to reduce fluctuations in energy measurements of hadronic showers, is a promising approach. The first part of this article reviews dual- and triple-readout calorimetry within a mathematical framework describing the underlying compensating mechanism. The second part proposes a potential implementation using an integrally active and total absorption detector. This model serves as the basis for several Monte Carlo studies, illustrating how the response of a multiple-readout calorimeter depends on construction parameters. Among the layouts considered, one configuration operating in triple-readout mode shows the potential to achieve an energy resolution approaching 20%/E.
Q2

Improvement and Characterisation of the ArCLight Large-Area Dielectric Light Detector for Liquid-Argon Time Projection Chambers
Bürgi J., Calivers L., Diurba R., Frieden F., Gauch A., Iacob L.F., Kreslo I., Kunzmann J., Parsa S., Weber M.
The detection of scintillation light in noble-liquid detectors is necessary for identifying neutrino interaction candidates from beam, astrophysical, or solar sources. Large monolithic detectors typically have highly efficient light sensors, like photomultipliers, mounted outside their electric field. This option is not available for modular detectors that wish to maximize their active volume. The ArgonCube light readout system detectors (ArCLights) are large-area thin-wavelength-shifting (WLS) panels that can operate in highly proximate modular detectors and within the electric field. The WLS plastic forming the bulk structure of the ArCLight has Tetraphenyl Butadiene (TPB) and sheets of dichroic mirror layered across its surface. It is coupled to a set of six silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). This publication compares TPB coating techniques for large surface areas and describes quality control methods for large-scale production.
Q2

Transition Edge Sensors: Physics and Applications
De Lucia M., Dal Bo P., Di Giorgi E., Lari T., Puglia C., Paolucci F.
Transition Edge Sensors (TESs) are amongst the most sensitive cryogenic detectors and can be easily optimized for the detection of massive particles or photons ranging from X-rays all the way down to millimetre radiation. Furthermore, TESs exhibit unmatched energy resolution while being easily frequency domain multiplexed in arrays of several hundred pixels. Such great performance, along with rather simple and sturdy readout and amplification chains make TESs extremely compelling for applications in many fields of scientific endeavour. While the first part of this article is an in-depth discussion on the working principles of Transition Edge Sensors, the remainder of this review article focuses on the applications of Transition Edge Sensors in advanced scientific instrumentation serving as an accessible and thorough list of possible starting points for more comprehensive literature research.
Q2

Light Output Function and Pulse-Shape Discrimination Capability of p-Terphenyl Organic Scintillator in Wide Neutron Energy Range of 1.1 to 19 MeV
Jančář A., Kopecký Z., Čulen J., Matěj Z., Košťál M.
In this work, we studied the light-output properties, efficiency function, as well as the pulse-shape discrimination (PSD) capability of p-Terphenyl scintillator. The selected solid cylindrical scintillation detector has a thickness of 45 mm and a diameter of 45 mm. Recently presented studies of light-output functions have only been measured for low-neutron energies. Our motivation has been to determine the light output function for p-Terphenyl scintillator more accurately over a wider neutron energy range. The measurements have been carried out with mono-energetic neutron beams in the wide energy range from 1.1 to 19 MeV. The neutron–gamma spectrometric system which we developed has been used for the measurement. The input analog signal from the detector was digitized with a fast 12-bits analog to digital converter with a sampling frequency of 1 GHz. Measured data from the detector are processed into the gamma and neutron spectra. The accurate light output function for the p-Therphenyl scintillator has been calculated. The pulse-shape discrimination capability, as well as the detection efficiency, of a p-Terphenyl scintillator are lower in comparison with a NE-213 equivalent detector.
Q2

Advances in Space Astroparticle Physics: Frontier Technologies for Particle Measurements in Space
Duranti M., Vagelli V.
In the last decades, breakthrough advances in understanding the mechanisms of the Universe and fundamental physics have been achieved through the exploitation of data on cosmic rays and high-energy radiation gathered via orbiting experiments, in a synergic and complementary international effort that combines space-based instrument data with ground-based space observatories, accelerator, and collider experiments [...]
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
Southeastern Naturalist
940 citations, 9.4%
|
|
PLoS ONE
219 citations, 2.19%
|
|
Journal of Wildlife Management
215 citations, 2.15%
|
|
Forest Ecology and Management
198 citations, 1.98%
|
|
Ecology and Evolution
160 citations, 1.6%
|
|
Journal of Mammalogy
153 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Northeastern Naturalist
150 citations, 1.5%
|
|
Biological Invasions
134 citations, 1.34%
|
|
American Midland Naturalist
130 citations, 1.3%
|
|
Ecosphere
112 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Hydrobiologia
94 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Copeia
90 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Scientific Reports
87 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Biological Conservation
82 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Wetlands
77 citations, 0.77%
|
|
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
74 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Diversity
73 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Freshwater Biology
71 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Zootaxa
70 citations, 0.7%
|
|
PeerJ
70 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Wildlife Society Bulletin
66 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Zoology
65 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Chelonian Conservation and Biology
64 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Forests
63 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Castanea
59 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
57 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Journal of Crustacean Biology
54 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
53 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
53 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Herpetologica
53 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Restoration Ecology
53 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Freshwater Science
52 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Biological Reviews
52 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Herpetology
50 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Natural Areas Journal
49 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Wildlife Research
49 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Ecological Indicators
48 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Animals
46 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Wilson Journal of Ornithology
45 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Conservation Genetics
45 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
43 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Environmental Biology of Fishes
42 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Landscape Ecology
42 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
42 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Ecological Applications
41 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Urban Ecosystems
40 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Fish Biology
39 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Marine Ecology - Progress Series
39 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Conservation Biology
38 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Estuaries and Coasts
38 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Molecular Ecology
38 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society
37 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Oecologia
34 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Wildlife Biology
34 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Freshwater Ecology
34 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Ecology of Freshwater Fish
34 citations, 0.34%
|
|
ICHTHYOLOGY AND HERPETOLOGY
33 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Biodiversity and Conservation
32 citations, 0.32%
|
|
River Research and Applications
32 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Environmental Management
32 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Raptor Research
30 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Natural History
29 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Environmental Entomology
29 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Mammalian Biology
29 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Animal Ecology
29 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
28 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Ecology
26 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Endangered Species Research
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Food Webs
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Marine Biology
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Ecological Modelling
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Invasive Plant Science and Management
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Southwestern Naturalist
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Ornithological Applications
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Insect Conservation
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
ZooKeys
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Zoology
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Diversity and Distributions
23 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Acta Chiropterologica
23 citations, 0.23%
|
|
European Journal of Wildlife Research
23 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Annals of the Entomological Society of America
23 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Western North American Naturalist
23 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
23 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
23 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Global Change Biology
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Plant Ecology
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Marine Science
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Fire Ecology
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Waterbirds
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Applied Ecology
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Wetlands Ecology and Management
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Insects
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Sustainability
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Mammal Research
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Conservation Science and Practice
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Florida Entomologist
20 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Field Ornithology
20 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Herpetological Monographs
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
|
Wiley
1929 citations, 19.29%
|
|
Springer Nature
1385 citations, 13.85%
|
|
Humboldt Field Research Institute
1091 citations, 10.91%
|
|
Elsevier
1016 citations, 10.16%
|
|
Oxford University Press
407 citations, 4.07%
|
|
MDPI
377 citations, 3.77%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
270 citations, 2.7%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
222 citations, 2.22%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
153 citations, 1.53%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
132 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
127 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
124 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
91 citations, 0.91%
|
|
American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
90 citations, 0.9%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
88 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Magnolia Press
83 citations, 0.83%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
83 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Brill
81 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Herpetologists League
72 citations, 0.72%
|
|
PeerJ
70 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
70 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
54 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
50 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
50 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Wilson Ornithological Society
46 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Southern Appalachian Botanical Society
45 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Chelonian Research Foundation
42 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Torrey Botanical Society
37 citations, 0.37%
|
|
The Royal Society
36 citations, 0.36%
|
|
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
36 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Nordic Council for Wildlife Research
32 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Raptor Research Foundation, Inc.
31 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Natural Areas Journal
31 citations, 0.31%
|
|
SciELO
28 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Southwestern Association of Naturalists
26 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Chelonian Conservation and Biology Journal
23 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Waterbird Society
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Florida Entomologist Society
20 citations, 0.2%
|
|
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Brigham Young University
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Entomological Society of Washington
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Kansas Academy of Science
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IOP Publishing
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Wildlife Disease Association
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SAGE
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
The Coleopterists Society
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Bryological & Lichenological Society
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Association of Zoo Veterinarians
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Castanea
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
EDP Sciences
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Malacological Society, Inc.
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Museum and Institute of Zoology at the Polish Academy of Sciences
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Society of Parasitology
11 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Helminthological Society
11 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Coastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc.
10 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Copernicus
10 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
10 citations, 0.1%
|
|
BioOne
10 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Herpetological Society of Japan
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Association for Bear Research and Management, University of Tennessee
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Mammalogical Society of Japan
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Arachnological Society
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Scientific Societies
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
F1000 Research
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Soil Science Society of America
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
National Shellfisheries Association, Inc.
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Entomological Society
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
New England Botanical Club, Inc.
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Annual Reviews
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Brazilian Herpetological Society
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Western North American Naturalist
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Fundacao Zoobotanica do Rio Grande
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Plant Management Network
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
University of Florida
18 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Texas A&M University
14 publications, 0.79%
|
|
North Carolina State University
9 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Mississippi State University
8 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Alabama
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Tennessee Technological University
7 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Tennessee
6 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Auburn University
5 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Clemson University
5 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Virginia Tech
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Florida International University
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Eastern Kentucky University
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Louisiana State University
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
4 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center
3 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Texas Tech University
3 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Tulane University
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Arkansas State University
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
East Carolina University
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Louisville
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Wilmington
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Tarleton State University
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Troy University
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Texas State University
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Old Dominion University
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Austin Peay State University
2 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Florida State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Colorado State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Oregon State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Eastern Illinois University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Northern State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Central Florida
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of South Florida
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Ohio University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Michigan Technological University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Central Michigan University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of British Columbia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
St. Cloud State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Purdue University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Frostburg State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Kansas State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Bucknell University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Pennsylvania Western University, Edinboro
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Trent University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Stetson University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Miami
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Western Kentucky University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Kentucky
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Boise State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Louisiana State University in Shreveport
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Asheville
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
High Point University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Texas Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Texas A&M University – Commerce
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Texas A&M University – Kingsville
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of South Alabama
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Florida Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Samford University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Utah
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of North Alabama
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Tennessee at Martin
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Connecticut
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Regina
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Windsor
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
École de Technologie Supérieure
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (49 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Texas A&M University
5 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Clemson University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Florida
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Alabama
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
North Carolina State University
2 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Texas Tech University
2 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
2 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Tennessee
2 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Auburn University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Virginia Tech
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Northern State University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
University of Central Florida
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Michigan Technological University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Tulane University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
St. Cloud State University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Frostburg State University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
University of Miami
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Eastern Kentucky University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Texas Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
University of Connecticut
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 261, 14.77%
USA
261 publications, 14.77%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 16, 0.91%
Georgia
16 publications, 0.91%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 0.23%
Canada
4 publications, 0.23%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 3, 0.17%
United Kingdom
3 publications, 0.17%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.11%
Norway
2 publications, 0.11%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.06%
France
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 0.06%
Australia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.06%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.06%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.06%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.06%
Italy
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 1, 0.06%
Myanmar
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.06%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.06%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.06%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.06%
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
USA
|
USA, 85, 25.68%
USA
85 publications, 25.68%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 6, 1.81%
Georgia
6 publications, 1.81%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1, 0.3%
United Kingdom
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1, 0.3%
Canada
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 1, 0.3%
Myanmar
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.3%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.3%
Norway
1 publication, 0.3%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|