Mitrofanov, Artem A
PhD in Chemistry
🤝
🤝
Artem is looking for opportunities for scientific collaboration
If you would like to do joint research with him/her, write a message or contact him/her on social media.
Authorization required.
Please confirm your email.
Thanks for signing up! Before getting started, could you verify your email address by clicking on the link we just emailed to you? If you didn't receive the email, we will gladly send you another.
Publications
39
Citations
546
h-index
12
Laboratory of Smart Chemical Design
Head of Laboratory
Research interests
Education
Lomonosov Moscow State University
2012 — 2014,
Master, Faculty of Materials Sciences
Lomonosov Moscow State University
2008 — 2012,
Bachelor, Faculty of Materials Sciences
- Applied Surface Science (1)
- Chemistry of Materials (4)
- Colloid Journal (1)
- Computational Materials Science (1)
- Dalton Transactions (2)
- Energies (1)
- European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry (1)
- High Energy Chemistry (1)
- Inorganic Chemistry (2)
- iScience (1)
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (2)
- Journal of Chemical Physics (1)
- Journal of Computational Chemistry (2)
- Journal of Molecular Liquids (1)
- Journal of Nanomaterials (1)
- Journal of Physical Chemistry A (1)
- Journal of Physical Chemistry C (1)
- Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (1)
- Materials Horizons (1)
- MedChemComm (1)
- Mendeleev Communications (1)
- Molecules (2)
- Nuclear Medicine and Biology (1)
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (1)
- RSC Advances (1)
- Scripta Materialia (1)
- Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange (1)
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Dudakov I.V., Savelev S.A., Nevolin I.M., Mitrofanov A.A., Korolev V.V., Gorbunova Y.G.
The presented multimodal transformer networks quantitatively reproduce experimental proton conductivity and the underlying conduction mechanism and provide predictive uncertainty estimates.
Korolev V., Mitrofanov A.
While artificial intelligence drives remarkable progress in natural sciences, its broader societal implications are mostly disregarded. In this study, we evaluate environmental impacts of deep learning in materials science through extensive benchmarking. In particular, a set of diverse neural networks is trained for a given supervised learning task to assess greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during training and inference phases. A chronological perspective showed diminishing returns, manifesting themselves as a 28% decrease in mean absolute error and nearly a 15,000% increase in the carbon footprint of model training in 2016-2022. By means of up-to-date graphics processing units, it is possible to partially offset the immense growth of GHG emissions. Nonetheless, the practice of employing energy-efficient hardware is overlooked by the materials informatics community, as follows from a literature analysis in the field. On the basis of our findings, we encourage researchers to report GHG emissions together with standard performance metrics.
Zubenko A.D., Shchukina A.A., Chernikova E.Y., Egorova B., Ikonnikova I., Priselkova A.B., Larenkov A.A., Bubenshchikov V.B., Mitrofanov A., Fedorov Y.V., Fedorova O.
In this article, we present the synthesis and characterization of new acyclic pyridine-containing polyaminocarboxylate ligands H4aPyta and H6aPyha, which differ in structural rigidity and the number of chelating groups. Their...
Matazova E.V., Egorova B.V., Zubenko A.D., Pashanova A.V., Mitrofanov A.A., Fedorova O.A., Ermolaev S.V., Vasiliev A.N., Kalmykov S.N.
Zamurueva L.S., Egorova B., Ikonnikova I., Zubenko A.D., Pashanova A.V., Karnoukhova V.A., Mitrofanov A., Trigub A., Moiseeva A.A., Priselkova A.B., Fedorova O., Kalmykov S.N.
In this work, we synthesized two new benzo-18-azacrown-6 ethers bearing picolinate and pyridine pendant arms and studied the copper complexes of these ligands, as well as those of an acetate analog.
Chernysheva M.G., Popov A.G., Dzianisik M.G., Egorov A.V., Egorova T.B., Gopin A.V., Mitrofanov A.A., Badun G.A.
Hydrogen treatment is a popular way of surface modification of nanodiamonds. Here, we used atomic hydrogen treatment of the functionalized surface to increase its hydrophobicity gently and maintain its overall composition. Corresponding mechanism was revealed via combination of theoretical and experimental methods.
Smirnova A., Yablonskiy M., Petrov V., Mitrofanov A.
Radiolytic stability is one of the main requirements of the ligands for the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. The prediction of radiation stability based only on the 2D molecular structural formula allows us to accelerate and simplify the development of new ligands. Here, we used quantum chemistry to investigate the radiolytic behavior of water-soluble diglycolamides as one of the most popular ligands for spent nuclear fuel reprocessing. The accurate accounting of conformational mobility in the descriptors based on the Frontier Orbital Fukui theory allowed us to obtain a good correlation between theoretical and experimental data.
Andreadi N., Zankov D., Karpov K., Mitrofanov A.
AbstractFinding global and local minima on the potential energy surface is a key task for most studies in computational chemistry. Having a set of possible conformations for chemical structures and their corresponding energies, one can judge their chemical activity, understand the mechanisms of reactions, describe the formation of metal‐ligand and ligand‐protein complexes, and so forth. Despite the fact that the interest in various minima search algorithms in computational chemistry arose a while ago (during the formation of this science), new methods are still emerging. These methods allow to perform conformational analysis and geometry optimization faster, more accurately, or for more specific tasks. This article presents the application of a novel global geometry optimization approach based on the Tree Parzen Estimator method. For benchmarking, a database of small organic molecule geometries in the global minimum conformation was created, as well as a software package to perform the tests.
Egorova B.V., Zamurueva L.S., Zubenko A.D., Pashanova A.V., Mitrofanov A.A., Priselkova A.B., Fedorov Y.V., Trigub A.L., Fedorova O.A., Kalmykov S.N.
A synthetic procedure for the synthesis of azacrown ethers with a combination of pendant arms has been developed and the synthesized ligand, characterized by various techniques, was studied. The prepared benzoazacrown ether with hybrid pendant arms and its complexes with copper and lead cations were studied in terms of biomedical applications. Similarly to a fully acetate analog, the new one binds both cations with close stability constants, despite the decrease in both constants. The calculated geometry of the complexes correlate with the data from X-ray absorption and NMR spectroscopy. Coordination of both cations differs due to the difference between the ionic radii. However, these chelation modes provide effective shielding of cations in both cases, that was shown by the stability of their complexes in the biologically relevant media towards transchelation and transmetallation.
Nugmanova A.G., Safonova E.A., Baranchikov A.E., Tameev A.R., Shkolin A.V., Mitrofanov A.A., Eliseev A.A., Meshkov I.N., Kalinina M.A.
• Photocatalysts are self-assembled from zinc porphyrins MOFs and graphene oxide. • These hybrids show ambivalent ability to red/ox photodegradation of dyes. • Photooxidation of dyes by singlet oxygen occurs in the oxygen-rich solutions. • Photoreduction of the same dyes is initiated under anaerobic conditions. • Size matching between the dyes and MOF micropores controls photoreduction. New photocatalysts were synthesized from graphene oxide (GO) and zinc porphyrins via non-covalent self-assembly in Pickering emulsions. The formation of surface-attached metal organic frameworks (SURMOFs) with different size of mesopores (1.1. and 1.6 nm) was confirmed by X-ray powder diffraction and BET nitrogen absorption methods. The activity of the SURMOF/GO materials in photodegradation of rhodamine 6G (Rh6G) and 1,5-dihydroxynaphtalene (DHN) were studied spectroscopically. The photocatalysts initiate aerobic oxidative photodestruction with k up to 2.3 × 10 −1 min −1 through generation of singlet oxygen on porphyrin centers. Under anaerobic conditions, these materials assist photoreduction of the same dyes in the SURMOF micropores. The mechanisms of photodegradation assisted by SURMOF/GO hybrids were confirmed by a combination of MALDI-TOF spectroscopy, Sensor Green and terephthalic acid probing. The size of the SURMOF pores controls the reduction, which occur due to the effective charge separation between porphyrin SURMOFs and GO. The photocatalyst with larger pores can transform both Rh6G and DHN, whereas that one with smaller pores is active only with respect to small DHN molecules. The ability of as-formed SURMOF/GOs to exploit two mechanisms yielding different products of photodestruction provides a basis for creating novel ambivalent photocatalysts for selective transformations of targeted compounds in molecular mixtures.
Mitrofanov A., Andreadi N., Korolev V., Kalmykov S.
Actinide chemistry often lies beyond the applicability domain of the majority of modern theoretical tools due to high computational costs, relativistic effects, or just the absence of actinide data for semiempirical method fitting. On the other hand, radioactivity pushes the usage of computational methods instead of experimental ones. Here, we would like to present a novel relPBE functional as an actinide-fitted version of the PBE0 functional.
Karpov K., Mitrofanov A., Korolev V., Tkachenko V.
The use of machine learning in chemistry has become a common practice. At the same time, despite the success of modern machine learning methods, the lack of data limits their use. Using a transfer learning methodology can help solve this problem. This methodology assumes that a model built on a sufficient amount of data captures general features of the chemical compound structure on which it was trained and that the further reuse of these features on a data set with a lack of data will greatly improve the quality of the new model. In this paper, we develop this approach for small organic molecules, implementing transfer learning with graph convolutional neural networks. The paper shows a significant improvement in the performance of the models for target properties with a lack of data. The effects of the data set composition on the model's quality and the applicability domain of the resulting models are also considered.
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Phase formation under hydrothermal conditions and thermodynamics properties in the GdPO4-YPO4 system
Enikeeva M.O., Proskurina O.V., Lopatin S.I., Gusarov V.V.
Norquist A.J.
Nurdillayeva R.N., Moral R.F., Pols M., Lee D., Altoe V., Schwartz C.P., Tao S., Sutter-Fella C.M.
Chen W., Mularso K.T., Jo B., Jung H.S.
This review explores the evolution of indoor perovskite solar cells driven by recent advances in material optimization and machine learning, fostering sustainable indoor energy solutions for interconnected smart technologies.
Lacerda S., de Kruijff R.M., Djanashvili K.
Recent years have seen a swift rise in the use of α-emitting radionuclides such as 225Ac and 223Ra as various radiopharmaceuticals to treat (micro)metastasized tumors. They have shown remarkable effectiveness in clinical practice owing to the highly cytotoxic α-particles that are emitted, which have a very short range in tissue, causing mainly double-stranded DNA breaks. However, it is essential that both chelation and targeting strategies are optimized for their successful translation to clinical application, as α-emitting radionuclides have distinctly different features compared to β−-emitters, including their much larger atomic radius. Furthermore, upon α-decay, any daughter nuclide irrevocably breaks free from the targeting molecule, known as the recoil effect, dictating the need for faster targeting to prevent healthy tissue toxicity. In this review we provide a brief overview of the current status of targeted α-therapy and highlight innovations in α-emitter-based chelator design, focusing on the role of click chemistry to allow for fast complexation to biomolecules at mild labeling conditions. Finally, an outlook is provided on different targeting strategies and the role that pre-targeting can play in targeted alpha therapy.
Han X., Wang X., Xu M., Feng Z., Yao B., Guo P., Gao Z., Lu Z.
Abstract
The discovery of advanced materials is the cornerstone of human technological development and progress. The structures of materials and their corresponding properties are essentially the result of a complex interplay of multiple degrees of freedom such as lattice, charge, spin, symmetry, and topology. This poses significant challenges for the inverse design methods of materials. Humans have long explored new materials through a large number of experiments and proposed corresponding theoretical systems to predict new material properties and structures. With the improvement of computational power, researchers have gradually developed various electronic structure calculation methods, such as the density functional theory and high-throughput computational methods. Recently, the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology in the field of computer science has enabled the effective characterization of the implicit association between material properties and structures, thus opening up an efficient paradigm for the inverse design of functional materials. A significant progress has been made in inverse design of materials based on generative and discriminative models, attracting widespread attention from researchers. Considering this rapid technological progress, in this survey, we look back on the latest advancements in AI-driven inverse design of materials by introducing the background, key findings, and mainstream technological development routes. In addition, we summarize the remaining issues for future directions. This survey provides the latest overview of AI-driven inverse design of materials, which can serve as a useful resource for researchers.
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Moghadam P.Z., Chung Y.G., Snurr R.Q.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of nanoporous material precisely synthesized from molecular building blocks. MOFs could have a critical role in many energy technologies, including carbon capture, separations and storage of energy carriers. Molecular simulations can improve our molecular-level understanding of adsorption in MOFs, and it is now possible to use realistic models for these complicated materials and predict their adsorption properties in quantitative agreement with experiments. Here we review the predictive design and discovery of MOF adsorbents for the separation and storage of energy-relevant molecules, with a view to understanding whether we can reliably discover novel MOFs computationally prior to laboratory synthesis and characterization. We highlight in silico approaches that have discovered new adsorbents that were subsequently confirmed by experiments, and we discuss the roles of high-throughput computational screening and machine learning. We conclude that these tools are already accelerating the discovery of new applications for existing MOFs, and there are now several examples of new MOFs discovered by computational modelling. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous materials that may find application in numerous energy settings, such as carbon capture and hydrogen-storage technologies. Here, the authors review predictive computational design and discovery of MOFs for separation and storage of energy-relevant gases.
Korolev V., Protsenko P.
Property prediction accuracy has long been a key parameter of machine learning in materials informatics. Accordingly, advanced models showing state-of-the-art performance turn into highly parameterized black boxes missing interpretability. Here, we present an elegant way to make their reasoning transparent. Human-readable text-based descriptions automatically generated within a suite of open-source tools are proposed as materials representation. Transformer language models pretrained on 2 million peer-reviewed articles take as input well-known terms such as chemical composition, crystal symmetry, and site geometry. Our approach outperforms crystal graph networks by classifying four out of five analyzed properties if one considers all available reference data. Moreover, fine-tuned text-based models show high accuracy in the ultra-small data limit. Explanations of their internal machinery are produced using local interpretability techniques and are faithful and consistent with domain expert rationales. This language-centric framework makes accurate property predictions accessible to people without artificial-intelligence expertise.
Comlek Y., Pham T.D., Snurr R.Q., Chen W.
AbstractData-driven materials design often encounters challenges where systems possess qualitative (categorical) information. Specifically, representing Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) through different building blocks poses a challenge for designers to incorporate qualitative information into design optimization, and leads to a combinatorial challenge, with large number of MOFs that could be explored. In this work, we integrated Latent Variable Gaussian Process (LVGP) and Multi-Objective Batch-Bayesian Optimization (MOBBO) to identify top-performing MOFs adaptively, autonomously, and efficiently. We showcased that our method (i) requires no specific physical descriptors and only uses building blocks that construct the MOFs for global optimization through qualitative representations, (ii) is application and property independent, and (iii) provides an interpretable model of building blocks with physical justification. By searching only ~1% of the design space, LVGP-MOBBO identified all MOFs on the Pareto front and 97% of the 50 top-performing designs for the CO2 working capacity and CO2/N2 selectivity properties.
Korolev V., Mitrofanov A.
While artificial intelligence is promoting remarkable progress in natural sciences, its broader societal implications are mostly disregarded. In this study, we evaluate the environmental impacts of deep learning in materials science through extensive benchmarking. Specifically, a diverse set of neural networks is trained for a particular supervised learning task to assess greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during training and inference phases. A chronological perspective shows diminishing returns, which are expressed in a 28% decrease in mean absolute error and nearly a 15000% increase in carbon footprint of model training in 2016–2022. By utilizing up-to-date graphics processing units, it is possible to partially offset the immense growth in GHG emissions. Nonetheless, the practice to employ energy-efficient hardware is unaddressed by the materials informatics community, as it follows from the literature analysis in the field. Based on our findings, we encourage researchers to report GHG emissions on par with standard performance metrics.
Chien A.A., Lin L., Nguyen H., Rao V., Sharma T., Wijayawardana R.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
The Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides a comprehensive assessment of the scientific literature relevant to climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. The report recognizes the interactions of climate, ecosystems and biodiversity, and human societies, and integrates across the natural, ecological, social and economic sciences. It emphasizes how efforts in adaptation and in reducing greenhouse gas emissions can come together in a process called climate resilient development, which enables a liveable future for biodiversity and humankind. The IPCC is the leading body for assessing climate change science. IPCC reports are produced in comprehensive, objective and transparent ways, ensuring they reflect the full range of views in the scientific literature. Novel elements include focused topical assessments, and an atlas presenting observed climate change impacts and future risks from global to regional scales. Available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Korovin A.N., Humonen I.S., Samtsevich A.I., Eremin R.A., Vasilev A.I., Lazarev V.D., Budennyy S.A.
The discovery of new catalysts is one of the significant topics of computational chemistry as it has the potential to accelerate the adoption of renewable energy sources. Recently developed deep learning approaches such as graph neural networks (GNNs) open new opportunity to significantly extend scope for modelling novel high-performance catalysts. Nevertheless, the graph representation of particular crystal structure is not a straightforward task due to the ambiguous connectivity schemes and numerous embeddings of nodes and edges. Here we present embedding improvement for GNN that has been modified by Voronoi tesselation and is able to predict the energy of catalytic systems within Open Catalyst Project dataset. Enrichment of the graph was calculated via Voronoi tessellation and the corresponding contact solid angles and types (direct or indirect) were considered as features of edges and Voronoi volumes were used as node characteristics. The auxiliary approach was enriching node representation by intrinsic atomic properties (electronegativity, period and group position). Proposed modifications allowed us to improve the mean absolute error of the original model and the final error equals to 651 meV per atom on the Open Catalyst Project dataset and 6 meV per atom on the intermetallics dataset. Also, by consideration of additional dataset, we show that a sensible choice of data can decrease the error to values above physically-based 20 meV per atom threshold.
Queen O., McCarver G.A., Thatigotla S., Abolins B.P., Brown C.L., Maroulas V., Vogiatzis K.D.
AbstractThe prediction of a variety of polymer properties from their monomer composition has been a challenge for material informatics, and their development can lead to a more effective exploration of the material space. In this work, PolymerGNN, a multitask machine learning architecture that relies on polymeric features and graph neural networks has been developed towards this goal. PolymerGNN provides accurate estimates for polymer properties based on a database of complex and heterogeneous polyesters (linear/branched, homopolymers/copolymers) with experimentally refined properties. In PolymerGNN, each polyester is represented as a set of monomer units, which are introduced as molecular graphs. A virtual screening of a large, computationally generated database with materials of variable composition was performed, a task that demonstrates the applicability of the PolymerGNN on future studies that target the exploration of the polymer space. Finally, a discussion on the explainability of the models is provided.
Mourino B., Jablonka K.M., Ortega‐Guerrero A., Smit B.
AbstractCovalent organic frameworks (COFs) stand out as prospective organic‐based photocatalysts given their intriguing optoelectronic properties, such as visible light absorption and high charge‐carrier mobility. The “Clean, Uniform, Refined with Automatic Tracking from Experimental Database” (CURATED) COFs is a database of reported experimental COFs that until now remained mostly unexplored for photocatalysis. In this study, the CURATED COFs database is screened for discovering potential photocatalysts using a set of DFT‐based descriptors that cost‐effectively assesses visible light absorption, preliminary thermodynamic feasibility of the desired pair of redox reactions, charge separation, and charge‐carrier mobility. The workflow can shortlist 13 COFs as prospective candidates for water splitting, and identify materials (Nx‐COF (x = 0–3)) that have been reported as candidates for hydrogen evolution reaction. Overall, the strategy addresses the challenge of exploring a large number of COFs by directing future research toward a selective group of COFs, while providing valuable insights into the structural design for achieving a desired photocatalytic process.
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Water Harvesting: Machine Learning-Based Prediction and Rapid Screening
Zhang Z., Tang H., Wang M., Lyu B., Jiang Z., Jiang J.
Total publications
39
Total citations
546
Citations per publication
14
Average publications per year
3.25
Average coauthors
5.49
Publications years
2014-2025 (12 years)
h-index
12
i10-index
14
m-index
1
o-index
40
g-index
23
w-index
4
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
i10-index
The number of the author's publications that received at least 10 links each.
m-index
The researcher's m-index is numerically equal to the ratio of his h-index to the number of years that have passed since the first publication.
o-index
The geometric mean of the h-index and the number of citations of the most cited article of the scientist.
g-index
For a given set of articles, sorted in descending order of the number of citations that these articles received, the g-index is the largest number such that the g most cited articles received (in total) at least g2 citations.
w-index
If w articles of a researcher have at least 10w citations each and other publications are less than 10(w+1) citations, then the researcher's w-index is equal to w.
Top-100
Fields of science
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 13, 33.33%
General Chemistry
13 publications, 33.33%
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 12, 30.77%
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
12 publications, 30.77%
|
General Chemical Engineering
|
General Chemical Engineering, 8, 20.51%
General Chemical Engineering
8 publications, 20.51%
|
Materials Chemistry
|
Materials Chemistry, 5, 12.82%
Materials Chemistry
5 publications, 12.82%
|
Inorganic Chemistry
|
Inorganic Chemistry, 5, 12.82%
Inorganic Chemistry
5 publications, 12.82%
|
General Materials Science
|
General Materials Science, 5, 12.82%
General Materials Science
5 publications, 12.82%
|
Molecular Medicine
|
Molecular Medicine, 4, 10.26%
Molecular Medicine
4 publications, 10.26%
|
General Physics and Astronomy
|
General Physics and Astronomy, 4, 10.26%
General Physics and Astronomy
4 publications, 10.26%
|
Organic Chemistry
|
Organic Chemistry, 3, 7.69%
Organic Chemistry
3 publications, 7.69%
|
Drug Discovery
|
Drug Discovery, 3, 7.69%
Drug Discovery
3 publications, 7.69%
|
Pharmaceutical Science
|
Pharmaceutical Science, 3, 7.69%
Pharmaceutical Science
3 publications, 7.69%
|
Condensed Matter Physics
|
Condensed Matter Physics, 3, 7.69%
Condensed Matter Physics
3 publications, 7.69%
|
Mechanics of Materials
|
Mechanics of Materials, 3, 7.69%
Mechanics of Materials
3 publications, 7.69%
|
Computational Mathematics
|
Computational Mathematics, 3, 7.69%
Computational Mathematics
3 publications, 7.69%
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 2, 5.13%
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
2 publications, 5.13%
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 2, 5.13%
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
2 publications, 5.13%
|
Computer Science Applications
|
Computer Science Applications, 2, 5.13%
Computer Science Applications
2 publications, 5.13%
|
Analytical Chemistry
|
Analytical Chemistry, 2, 5.13%
Analytical Chemistry
2 publications, 5.13%
|
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
|
Chemistry (miscellaneous), 2, 5.13%
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
2 publications, 5.13%
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2, 5.13%
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
2 publications, 5.13%
|
Surfaces and Interfaces
|
Surfaces and Interfaces, 2, 5.13%
Surfaces and Interfaces
2 publications, 5.13%
|
Library and Information Sciences
|
Library and Information Sciences, 2, 5.13%
Library and Information Sciences
2 publications, 5.13%
|
Metals and Alloys
|
Metals and Alloys, 1, 2.56%
Metals and Alloys
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Biochemistry
|
Biochemistry, 1, 2.56%
Biochemistry
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Cancer Research
|
Cancer Research, 1, 2.56%
Cancer Research
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Spectroscopy
|
Spectroscopy, 1, 2.56%
Spectroscopy
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Pharmacology
|
Pharmacology, 1, 2.56%
Pharmacology
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Multidisciplinary
|
Multidisciplinary, 1, 2.56%
Multidisciplinary
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Colloid and Surface Chemistry
|
Colloid and Surface Chemistry, 1, 2.56%
Colloid and Surface Chemistry
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Process Chemistry and Technology
|
Process Chemistry and Technology, 1, 2.56%
Process Chemistry and Technology
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 1, 2.56%
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Mechanical Engineering
|
Mechanical Engineering, 1, 2.56%
Mechanical Engineering
1 publication, 2.56%
|
General Energy
|
General Energy, 1, 2.56%
General Energy
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
|
Energy Engineering and Power Technology, 1, 2.56%
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
|
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, 1, 2.56%
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
|
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 1, 2.56%
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Building and Construction
|
Building and Construction, 1, 2.56%
Building and Construction
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Control and Optimization
|
Control and Optimization, 1, 2.56%
Control and Optimization
1 publication, 2.56%
|
General Computer Science
|
General Computer Science, 1, 2.56%
General Computer Science
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Engineering (miscellaneous)
|
Engineering (miscellaneous), 1, 2.56%
Engineering (miscellaneous)
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Energy (miscellaneous)
|
Energy (miscellaneous), 1, 2.56%
Energy (miscellaneous)
1 publication, 2.56%
|
Show all (11 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Journals
1
2
3
4
|
|
Chemistry of Materials
4 publications, 10.26%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
3 publications, 7.69%
|
|
Journal of Computational Chemistry
2 publications, 5.13%
|
|
Molecules
2 publications, 5.13%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
2 publications, 5.13%
|
|
Dalton Transactions
2 publications, 5.13%
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry
2 publications, 5.13%
|
|
Nuclear Medicine and Biology
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Materials Horizons
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
RSC Advances
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Computational Materials Science
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Colloid Journal
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
iScience
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
High Energy Chemistry
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Scripta Materialia
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Journal of Nanomaterials
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Energies
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
MedChemComm
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
Citing journals
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry
22 citations, 3.96%
|
|
Chemistry of Materials
19 citations, 3.42%
|
|
Dalton Transactions
18 citations, 3.24%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
18 citations, 3.24%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
12 citations, 2.16%
|
|
Molecules
11 citations, 1.98%
|
|
Journal not defined
|
Journal not defined, 10, 1.8%
Journal not defined
10 citations, 1.8%
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
9 citations, 1.62%
|
|
ACS Nano
8 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
8 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
7 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
7 citations, 1.26%
|
|
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
7 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Advanced Materials
7 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
6 citations, 1.08%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
6 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
6 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Nanomaterials
6 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
6 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
6 citations, 1.08%
|
|
npj Computational Materials
6 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Briefings in Bioinformatics
6 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
5 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Materials Horizons
5 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Computational Materials Science
5 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
5 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Matter
5 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Energies
5 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Patterns
5 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Nanoscale
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
RSC Advances
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Nature Communications
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Journal of the American Chemical Society
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Acta Materialia
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Chemical Science
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Scientific Reports
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
ACS Omega
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Journal of Energy Chemistry
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
4 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Nuclear Medicine and Biology
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Journal of Computational Chemistry
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Advanced Science
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Materials and Design
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
ACS Energy Letters
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Molecular Informatics
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Computational and Theoretical Chemistry
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Crystal Growth and Design
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Russian Journal of General Chemistry
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
High Energy Chemistry
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Crystals
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Langmuir
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Chemical Society Reviews
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Russian Chemical Reviews
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Solar RRL
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Advanced Theory and Simulations
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Химия высоких энергий
3 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Advanced Optical Materials
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Colloid Journal
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Cheminformatics
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Trends in Chemistry
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
AICHE Journal
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Chemical Physics Letters
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Russian Journal of Organic Chemistry
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Frontiers in Chemistry
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Physical Review Materials
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
ChemistrySelect
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Chemical Communications
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Small
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Moscow University Chemistry Bulletin
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Energy and Environmental Science
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Russian Chemical Bulletin
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Materials Today Communications
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Chem
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Frontiers in Energy Research
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Radiochemistry
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Radiochimica Acta
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Minerals
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Polyhedron
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Heliyon
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Solar Energy
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Nano Energy
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Science China Materials
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Materials
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
РАДИОХИМИЯ
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Cell Reports Physical Science
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Digital Discovery
2 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy
1 citation, 0.18%
|
|
Surfaces and Interfaces
1 citation, 0.18%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishers
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
12 publications, 30.77%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
7 publications, 17.95%
|
|
Elsevier
6 publications, 15.38%
|
|
Wiley
3 publications, 7.69%
|
|
MDPI
3 publications, 7.69%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
2 publications, 5.13%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Organizations from articles
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
36 publications, 92.31%
|
|
A.N.Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences
8 publications, 20.51%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
7 publications, 17.95%
|
|
Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
4 publications, 10.26%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 3, 7.69%
Organization not defined
3 publications, 7.69%
|
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 7.69%
|
|
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation of Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
ITMO University
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Federal Medical Biophysical Center named after A.I. Burnazyan
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
Troitsk Institute for Innovation and Fusion Research
1 publication, 2.56%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Countries from articles
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 37, 94.87%
Russia
37 publications, 94.87%
|
USA
|
USA, 10, 25.64%
USA
10 publications, 25.64%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 7, 17.95%
Country not defined
7 publications, 17.95%
|
Tajikistan
|
Tajikistan, 1, 2.56%
Tajikistan
1 publication, 2.56%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Citing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
92 citations, 16.85%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 62, 11.36%
Organization not defined
62 citations, 11.36%
|
A.N.Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences
31 citations, 5.68%
|
|
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
28 citations, 5.13%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
13 citations, 2.38%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
12 citations, 2.2%
|
|
Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
12 citations, 2.2%
|
|
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
11 citations, 2.01%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
11 citations, 2.01%
|
|
Zhejiang University
11 citations, 2.01%
|
|
Northwestern University
10 citations, 1.83%
|
|
Tsinghua University
9 citations, 1.65%
|
|
Central South University
8 citations, 1.47%
|
|
Wrocław University of Science and Technology
8 citations, 1.47%
|
|
ITMO University
7 citations, 1.28%
|
|
V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute
7 citations, 1.28%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
7 citations, 1.28%
|
|
National University of Singapore
7 citations, 1.28%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
7 citations, 1.28%
|
|
Purdue University
7 citations, 1.28%
|
|
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
6 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
6 citations, 1.1%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Peking University
6 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
6 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Southeast University
6 citations, 1.1%
|
|
University of Cambridge
6 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Southern University of Science and Technology
6 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
6 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Osipyan Institute of Solid State Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
5 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Wuhan University
5 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Shanghai University
5 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Université de Rennes
5 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Rennes
5 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Ural Federal University
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Cornell University
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Brookhaven National Laboratory
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
University of St Andrews
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Forschungszentrum Jülich
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
University of South Carolina
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Southern Federal University
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
King Khalid University
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Pandit Deendayal Energy University
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Center for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Uppsala University
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
East China Normal University
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
University of Oxford
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
North University of China
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Curtin University
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
University of Chicago
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
University of Groningen
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
University of Sheffield
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Utah State University
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Federal University of Pará
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
University of Zagreb
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Włodzimierz Trzebiatowski Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, Polish Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Institute of Experimental Mineralogy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Samara State Technical University
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Moscow Pedagogical State University
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
A.A. Bochvar High-Technology Scientific Research Institute for Inorganic Materials
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Scientific Research Institute for System Analysis of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
State Research Institute for Chemistry and Technology of Organoelement Compounds
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Koc University
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
University of Madras
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Jilin University
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Nanjing University
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
University of Helsinki
2 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Citing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
China
|
China, 142, 26.01%
China
142 citations, 26.01%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 123, 22.53%
Russia
123 citations, 22.53%
|
USA
|
USA, 98, 17.95%
USA
98 citations, 17.95%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 61, 11.17%
Country not defined
61 citations, 11.17%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 29, 5.31%
Germany
29 citations, 5.31%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 22, 4.03%
United Kingdom
22 citations, 4.03%
|
India
|
India, 22, 4.03%
India
22 citations, 4.03%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 18, 3.3%
Poland
18 citations, 3.3%
|
France
|
France, 17, 3.11%
France
17 citations, 3.11%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 14, 2.56%
Republic of Korea
14 citations, 2.56%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 13, 2.38%
Singapore
13 citations, 2.38%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 12, 2.2%
Australia
12 citations, 2.2%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 10, 1.83%
Canada
10 citations, 1.83%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 10, 1.83%
Netherlands
10 citations, 1.83%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 9, 1.65%
Brazil
9 citations, 1.65%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 1.28%
Turkey
7 citations, 1.28%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 1.1%
Spain
6 citations, 1.1%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 6, 1.1%
Italy
6 citations, 1.1%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 6, 1.1%
Japan
6 citations, 1.1%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 5, 0.92%
Iran
5 citations, 0.92%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.73%
Belgium
4 citations, 0.73%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 4, 0.73%
Croatia
4 citations, 0.73%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 4, 0.73%
Sweden
4 citations, 0.73%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.55%
Denmark
3 citations, 0.55%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.55%
Saudi Arabia
3 citations, 0.55%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 0.55%
Finland
3 citations, 0.55%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.55%
Czech Republic
3 citations, 0.55%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.55%
Switzerland
3 citations, 0.55%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.37%
Argentina
2 citations, 0.37%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.37%
Hungary
2 citations, 0.37%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.37%
Greece
2 citations, 0.37%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.37%
Indonesia
2 citations, 0.37%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.37%
Colombia
2 citations, 0.37%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.37%
Romania
2 citations, 0.37%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.18%
Kazakhstan
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.18%
Ukraine
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.18%
Algeria
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.18%
Vietnam
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Hong Kong
|
Hong Kong, 1, 0.18%
Hong Kong
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.18%
Egypt
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.18%
Israel
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.18%
Jordan
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.18%
Iraq
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.18%
Ireland
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.18%
Cyprus
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.18%
Morocco
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.18%
Mexico
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.18%
Nigeria
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.18%
Norway
1 citation, 0.18%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.18%
UAE
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.18%
Pakistan
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.18%
Slovenia
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.18%
Tunisia
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.18%
Chile
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.18%
Sri Lanka
1 citation, 0.18%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.18%
South Africa
1 citation, 0.18%
|
Show all (26 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
This section displays the profiles of scientists registered on the platform. To display the full list, invite your colleagues to register.