Journal of Micro/ Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
SJR
0.393
CiteScore
3.4
Categories
Mechanical Engineering
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Condensed Matter Physics
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Areas
Engineering
Materials Science
Physics and Astronomy
Years of issue
2007-2023
journal names
Journal of Micro/ Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Micro/ Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS
(873 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(42 publications)

Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre
(33 publications)

National Institute of Standards and Technology
(22 publications)

Babol University of Medical Sciences
(1 publication)

Dalian University of Technology
(1 publication)

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
(1 publication)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 5199
Q1

Treetop: topology optimization using constructive solid geometry trees
Kumar Padhy R., Thombre P., Suresh K., Chandrasekhar A.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Integrating moving morphable components and plastic layout optimization: a two-stage approach for enhanced structural topology optimization
Lotfalian A., Esmaeilpour P., Yoon G.H., Takalloozadeh M.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Simultaneous node-based shape and thickness optimization of thin-walled structures using the explicit Vertex Morphing method
Schmölz D., Devresse B., Geiser A., Bletzinger K.
Abstract
Node-based shape optimization has been successfully and consistently formulated via shape and sensitivity filtering methods. This work studies the union of the Vertex Morphing method, a shape parameterization technique that uses an explicit shape filtering approach, and shell thickness optimization. On this occasion, thickness variables are explicitly filtered similarly to the shape, but their filter is computed on the initial geometry configuration throughout the optimization. The problem is formulated such that both design variable types are optimized concurrently. Gradient-based algorithms are employed to solve the optimization problem, which have proven well suited for the Vertex Morphing method. Due to the different dimensionalities of the shape and thickness variables, a design variable scaling method between the two types is proposed, improving the convergence behavior without the necessity of second-order information. Academic examples and the application of a structure with industrial significance illustrate the method’s success.
Q1

Connectivity-driven topology optimization for path-following compliant mechanism: a formulation with predictive volume constraints and adaptive strategies for gray element suppression
Zhang L., Koppen S., van Keulen F.
Abstract
We propose a topology optimization (TO) formulation and related optimization scheme for designing compliant mechanisms following a user-defined trajectory. To ensure the broad applicability and achieve precisely control of the outputs, geometric nonlinearity with incremental solutions are considered. A challenge in the design optimization of these structures is the development of formulations with satisfactory balance between (i) precise trajectory control and (ii) proper connectivity between the input/output ports and the support. Previously proposed density-based topology optimization formulations typically lack the promotion of the desired load-transferring connections, or usually complicate the design using mixed shape, size, and topology variables to enforce a minimum connectivity. To simplify design progress using exclusive topology variables, i.e., purely density-based TO methods, we propose a relatively straightforward formulation involving commonly used response functions, such as compliance and volume as constraints. For the constraints, the paper provides a scheme for defining corresponding upper limits. Numerical examples of challenging shell and plate design optimization problems demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed formulation and scheme in the generation of load-transferring connections while limiting the impact on the performance of the path generation functionality.
Q1

Multiscale structural concurrent fail-safe topology optimization
Ding W., Jia H., Xu P., Zhang Y., Cheng F.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Minimum size control for binary topology optimization
Cortez R.L., Setta M., Picelli R., Wadbro E.
Abstract
Topology optimization methods employing binary (also known as discrete) design variables currently lack mathematical formulations to ensure length scale control in their solutions. This paper proposes and applies a morphology-mimicking filtering scheme to provide a minimum size control (often also referred to as minimum length scale control) in this class of binary designs. The Topology Optimization of Binary Structures (TOBS) method was chosen as the foundational framework for this length scale control study. Thermal and structural compliance scenarios were explored under this approach. Numerical results show that the proposed filter efficiently imposes the desired minimum length scale. The optimized designs were also less dependent on the filtering parameters when compared to designs optimized using standard techniques that employ continuous design variables.
Q1

Automatic projection parameter increase for three-field density-based topology optimization
Dunning P., Wein F.
Abstract
A method is proposed to automatically increase the threshold projection parameter in three-field density-based topology optimization to achieve near binary designs. The three-field method is composed of an element-wise design density field that is filtered and then passed through a smooth threshold projection function to compute the projected density field, which is then used to compute element properties, e.g., using a power law for stiffness. The sharpness of the threshold projection function is controlled by a parameter
$$\beta $$
β
. In this paper, a method is introduced to automatically increase this parameter during optimization by linking it to the change in objective function. Furthermore, the gray value indicator is added as a stopping criterion to guarantee the solution is near binary. This results in a method that does not need to be tuned for specific problems, or optimizers, and the same set of user-defined parameters can be used for a wide range of problems. However, a high value of the threshold projection parameter may cause convergence issues for some optimizers, such as the optimally criteria method, and an adaptive move limit strategy is introduced to overcome this problem. It is also shown that some problems require length-scale control to achieve a near binary design. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated on several benchmark problems, including linear compliance, linear buckling, compliant mechanism, heat conduction, and geometrically nonlinear problems.
Q1

A sequential linear programming approach for truss optimization based on the uncertainty analysis-based data-driven computational mechanics (UA-DDCM)
Huang M., Du Z., Liu C., Zhang W., Guo X.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Topology optimization for pressurized nonlinear structures using substructure and experimental studies
Lu Y., Luo Q., Tong L.
Abstract
A compliant structure under fluidic pressure can undergo relatively large shape change, but the design of such type of structure is challenging as the pressure distribution depends on detailed structural geometry. In this study, a novel mixed substructure-density (MSD) model is proposed for topology representation and update in the optimal design of nonlinear compliant structures under quasi-static fluidic pressure. An optimization algorithm is developed via implementing the present model by using super-elements in commercial finite element analysis (FEA) software. Numerical examples are presented to validate the present model, algorithm, and designs numerically via full linear and nonlinear FEAs. A planar cellular network with five cells arranged in parallel is then designed for representing a pressurized wing rib structure capable of modulating airfoil thickness variation. The test results of the single-cell and five-cell PCS specimens prototyped using polyurethane material show that the respective cell thickness can be reduced by 11.9 and 6.4% respectively under a cell pressure of 250 kPa.
Q1

Constructability-based multi-objective optimization with machine learning-enhanced meta-heuristics for reinforcing bar design in rectangular concrete columns
Verduzco L.F.
Abstract
Optimization of reinforcing bar (rebar) design represents a preponderant factor in reducing material usage and wastes for reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The assessment of constructability of such rebar designs is crucial to improve their practicality and reduce construction costs, which makes the problem multi-objective (MO). However, when applying optimization methods for the design of rebar in RC structures, little attention has been paid on columns, in comparison to beams and slabs. Meta-heuristic algorithms (MA) have been the ones mostly deployed for these types of elements, which have proven to be of high computational cost. Additionally, an existing gap in the literature as to how to relate the design and construction stage of rebar in RC structures through constructability analysis is evident. In this regard, research has been focused mainly at the building level but not at the element level. This works presents a novel algorithmic framework using Machine Learning (ML)-enhanced meta-heuristics for the optimal design of rebar on rectangular RC columns. To assess the constructability of the resulting rebar layouts a Buildability Score (BS) model at the element level is proposed. The complexity analysis of rebar design under the constructability restrictions, through combinatorial optimization (CO), is used to assess the global time efficiency of the framework. The Non-Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) was deployed for showcase and five different ML algorithms were used to enhance it, namely the k-NN classifier, SVM regression, ANN, Gauss Process (GP) regression, and Tree Ensembles (TE), where the latter three showed the best performance.
Q1

Density-based hole seeding in XFEM level-set topology optimization of fluid problems
Høghøj L.C., Andreasen C.S., Maute K.
Abstract
The optimization results of level-set methods typically suffer from a strong dependence on the initial design. To mitigate this dependence, this work presents a density-based hole nucleation method for level-set topology optimization of flow problems. This is achieved by defining both the level-set and density values as functions of the design variables. To preserve the crispness of the geometry definition afforded by the level-set method, the fluid flow is modeled using the Heaviside enriched eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) for the laminar incompressible Navier–Stokes equation, which is augmented by a Brinkman model. The boundary conditions are enforced weakly using Nitsche’s method. A face-oriented ghost stabilization scheme is applied to stabilize the XFEM formulation. Additional terms ensuring stability are added to Nitsche’s method and the ghost stabilization to account for the Brinkman term in the Navier–Stokes equation. The necessity of adding these terms is highlighted by numerical studies. Two- and three-dimensional fluid manifolds are optimized to minimize fluid power dissipation while achieving a predefined mass flow distribution among the outlets. The optimization results show that the proposed method bypasses the need for an initial hole seeding and speeds up the convergence of the optimization process.
Q1

Topology optimization of beams’ cross-sectional properties considering torsional and warping behavior
Kostopoulos C., Marzok A., Waisman H.
This paper introduces a novel efficient topology optimization methodology for beams’ torsion using the warping function formulation. The finite element method is used to discretize the cross-section and an efficient gradient-based optimization problem is formulated to optimize the relevant parameters corresponding to the torsion and warping constants of the beam. As a result, for the first time, one can optimize a beam for problems where the warping behavior is dominant. Density-based optimization is defined where the SIMP approach is utilized to penalize intermediate element densities. A key challenge of the optimization that arises in the warping function framework is the design-dependent nature of the problem. That is, the forcing vector varies during the optimization as it depends on the cross-section boundaries, which are functions of the updating topology. To this end, a differentiable boundary recognition algorithm is proposed. The methodology is applied to design beam cross-sections in which both torsion and warping constants are of interest. While intuitive topologies are obtained in the case of optimized torsion constant, this is not the case for the warping constant. The latter shows unique material distributions and a special dependence on the allowable material density.
Q1

Uncertainty-based multi-disciplinary multi-objective design optimization of unmanned mining electric shovel
Hu Z., Long X., Lian K., Lin S., Song X.
Electric shovel (ES) is a large mining equipment crucial for energy security. The traditional design of the structure and control system of ES is carried out in stages, and the influence of the structural uncertainty for the system is not considered, which makes it difficult to obtain the optimal parameters of the system. Facing the demand of intelligent development, ES designed using traditional deterministic methods is difficult to meet the working demand of unmanned mining electric shovel (UMES). To address these challenges, this paper proposes an uncertainty-based multidisciplinary multi-objective optimization (UMMO) framework for UMES. Within this framework, the mechanical structure of the front-end mechanism was analyzed, excavation trajectories were planned based on a polynomial point-to-point motion strategy, and models for the excavation resistance of the dipper and the dynamical model of the front-end working device were constructed. Then, optimization objective functions were constructed with excavation energy consumption, excavation efficiency, and full dipper rate as targets. By analyzing the working characteristics of UMES, essential constraints were introduced for the mechanical system, control system and hardware. The UMMO optimization model was established to enhance the reliability of the UMES production process. Finally, the mechanical structure dimensions and control system parameters are optimized to generate the optimal physical structure and excavation trajectory considering uncertainties. The numerical results show that compared with the deterministic optimization results, the optimized structure of the proposed UMMO strategy is more compact and the mechanical structure is more reliable in the production process.
Q1

A collaborative adaptive Kriging-based algorithm for the reliability analysis of nested systems
Ye K., Wang H., Ma X.
Complex engineering systems that involve multiple disciplines or scales are often decomposed into multiple subsystems in a nested or hierarchical manner to enhance the analysis efficiency. However, uncertainties inherent in input parameters will propagate with hierarchy, and severely threaten the reliability of engineering systems. Adaptive surrogate modeling technique is a potent tool to alleviate the computational burden of reliability analysis, especially involving time-consuming computer experiments. Conventional black-box adaptive surrogate modeling framework did not incorporate nested characteristic, which is inefficient for the reliability analysis of complex systems with nested or hierarchical characteristics. This paper develops a collaborative adaptive Kriging-based algorithm for the reliability analysis of nested systems. First, we propose a nested U-function to propel the adaptive updating of underlying Kriging models and derive its approximate closed form based on a defined most probable misclassification point. Then, an accuracy enhancement stage is devised to compensate for the inaccuracies of first-order approximation in early iterations. A parallel radius-based importance sampling technique is presented to mitigate the computational effort at multiple candidates. Finally, an index considering the reduction of model uncertainty is exploited to quantify the contribution of individual Kriging model and select the to-be-refined Kriging model in one iteration. Through numerical examples and case studies, the superiority of the proposed methodology is comprehensively illustrated compared with other benchmark methods.
Q1

Discrete variable topology optimization using multi-cut formulation and adaptive trust regions
Ye Z., Pan W.
We present a new framework for efficiently solving general topology optimization (TO) problems that find an optimal material distribution within a design space to maximize the performance of a part or structure while satisfying design constraints. These problems can involve convex or non-convex objective functions and may include multiple candidate materials. The framework is designed to greatly enhance computational efficiency, primarily by diminishing optimization iteration counts and thereby reducing the frequency of solving associated state equilibrium partial differential equations (PDEs) (e.g., through the finite element method (FEM)). It maintains binary design variables and addresses the large-scale mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem that arises from discretizing the design space and PDEs. The core of this framework is the integration of the generalized Benders’ decomposition and adaptive trust regions. Specifically, by formulating the master sub-problem (decomposed from the MINLP) as a multi-cut optimization problem and enabling the estimation of the upper and lower bounds of the original objective function, significant acceleration in solution convergence is achieved. The trust region radius adapts based on a merit function. To mitigate ill-conditioning due to extreme parameter values, we further introduce a parameter relaxation scheme where two parameters are relaxed in stages at different paces, improving both solution quality and efficiency. Numerical tests validate the framework’s superior performance, including minimum compliance and compliant mechanism problems in single-material and multi-material designs. We compare our results with those of other methods and demonstrate significant reductions in optimization iterations (and therefore the number of FEM analyses required) by about one order of magnitude, while maintaining comparable optimal objective function values and material layouts. As the design variables and constraints increase, the framework maintains consistent solution quality and efficiency, underscoring its good scalability. We anticipate this framework will be especially advantageous for TO applications involving substantial design variables and constraints and requiring significant computational resources for FEM analyses (or PDE solving).
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
Journal of Micro/ Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS
873 citations, 7.16%
|
|
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
822 citations, 6.74%
|
|
Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B:Nanotechnology and Microelectronics
386 citations, 3.17%
|
|
Optics Express
382 citations, 3.13%
|
|
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers & Short Notes
284 citations, 2.33%
|
|
Applied Optics
229 citations, 1.88%
|
|
Microelectronic Engineering
185 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Micromachines
182 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering
173 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology
158 citations, 1.3%
|
|
Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology
153 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
143 citations, 1.17%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
126 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Measurement Science and Technology
116 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
113 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Nanotechnology
112 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
111 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical
102 citations, 0.84%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
95 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Microsystem Technologies
89 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Sensors
85 citations, 0.7%
|
|
IEEE Sensors Journal
79 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena
74 citations, 0.61%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing
62 citations, 0.51%
|
|
ACS Nano
57 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Optical Engineering
57 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Scientific Reports
55 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
52 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Optics Letters
51 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
51 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
50 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal Physics D: Applied Physics
50 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces and Films
45 citations, 0.37%
|
|
AIP Advances
44 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Macromolecules
44 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Review of Scientific Instruments
43 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Optics Communications
43 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Nanomaterials
41 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Optics and Laser Technology
40 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
40 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision
39 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Frontiers of Nanoscience
37 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
36 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Polymers
35 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Nanoscale
34 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Micro and Nano Engineering
34 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Photonics
33 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics Processing and Phenomena
33 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Advanced Materials
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Access
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Chemistry of Materials
31 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Physics of Plasmas
31 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Advanced Optical Technologies
30 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Thin Solid Films
30 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Materials
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Ultramicroscopy
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Lab on a Chip
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Optics (United Kingdom)
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Langmuir
27 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Nano Letters
26 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Microsystems and Nanoengineering
26 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Applied Physics Express
26 citations, 0.21%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
26 citations, 0.21%
|
|
RSC Advances
24 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Smart Materials and Structures
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Nature Electronics
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
ACS Omega
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Russian Microelectronics
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Advanced Optical Materials
19 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Small
19 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEEE Photonics Journal
19 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Precision Engineering
19 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
19 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Microelectronics Reliability
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IEEE Photonics Technology Letters
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
ACS Applied Nano Materials
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Optik
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advanced Materials Technologies
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL IMAGING
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nature Communications
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Micro and Nano Letters
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Applied Crystallography
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Advanced Materials Interfaces
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Microelectronics Journal
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Modern Optics
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Analytical Chemistry
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Science advances
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
2094 citations, 17.18%
|
|
Elsevier
1366 citations, 11.21%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1156 citations, 9.48%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
775 citations, 6.36%
|
|
Springer Nature
739 citations, 6.06%
|
|
IOP Publishing
709 citations, 5.82%
|
|
MDPI
550 citations, 4.51%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
527 citations, 4.32%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
495 citations, 4.06%
|
|
AIP Publishing
449 citations, 3.68%
|
|
Wiley
391 citations, 3.21%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
301 citations, 2.47%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
270 citations, 2.22%
|
|
The Technical Association of Photopolymers, Japan
128 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
90 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
75 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
55 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
52 citations, 0.43%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
49 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
46 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
ASME International
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
31 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
27 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
25 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Oxford University Press
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
SAGE
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
19 citations, 0.16%
|
|
World Scientific
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
13 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
13 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IntechOpen
12 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Emerald
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Science in China Press
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Annual Reviews
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Royal Society
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IGI Global
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Korean Society of Precision Engineering
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Laser Institute of America
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Institute of Electronics Packaging
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Zhejiang University Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Korean Institute of Electrical and Electronic Material Engineers
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Optical Society of India
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Federal Informational-Analytical Center of the Defense Industry
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Information Processing Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine - Institute of Semiconductor Physics
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Thomas Telford
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
IOS Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Begell House
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Image Processing Systems Institute of RAS
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
MIT Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Biophysical Society
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Instrument Society of America
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Crop Science Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Nonferrous Metals Society of China
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Academic Publishing Limited
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Electromagnetics Academy
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Shanghai Jiaotong University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics (NAS Ukraine)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
42 publications, 2.52%
|
|
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre
33 publications, 1.98%
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology
22 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Paul Scherrer Institute
20 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
20 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
15 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
13 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Samsung
12 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Central Electronics Engineering Research Institute
10 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
10 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Systems and Device Technology
10 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Toshiba Corporation
10 publications, 0.6%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
9 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
9 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
8 publications, 0.48%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
8 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Texas A&M University
8 publications, 0.48%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Hanyang University
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Twente
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
National Sun Yat-sen University
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
National Taiwan University
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
National Central University
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Chicago
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Osaka University
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Birmingham
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos"
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Optics and Precision Engineering
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Tsinghua University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Peking University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Stanford University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Yonsei University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Tohoku University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Ilmenau University of Technology
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Tokyo
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Institute of Microelectronics of Barcelona
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Brigham Young University
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Institute for Physics of Microstructures of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Tabriz
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Fudan University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Feng Chia University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Boston University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
National University of Defense Technology
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Leiden University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Waseda University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Ain Shams University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Royal Philips
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Alberta
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Manitoba
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Indian Space Research Organisation
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Kurukshetra University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Southeast University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of New South Wales
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
North University of China
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Manchester
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
National University of Singapore
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Seoul National University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Babol University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Beijing University of Chemical Technology
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Shanghai University of Engineering Science
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Anhui University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Systems and Device Technology
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
1
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 364, 21.88%
USA
364 publications, 21.88%
|
China
|
China, 179, 10.76%
China
179 publications, 10.76%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 95, 5.71%
Japan
95 publications, 5.71%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 76, 4.57%
Germany
76 publications, 4.57%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 43, 2.58%
Belgium
43 publications, 2.58%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 42, 2.52%
Netherlands
42 publications, 2.52%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 40, 2.4%
Republic of Korea
40 publications, 2.4%
|
India
|
India, 34, 2.04%
India
34 publications, 2.04%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 33, 1.98%
Switzerland
33 publications, 1.98%
|
France
|
France, 23, 1.38%
France
23 publications, 1.38%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 15, 0.9%
Israel
15 publications, 0.9%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 13, 0.78%
Canada
13 publications, 0.78%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 10, 0.6%
Iran
10 publications, 0.6%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 9, 0.54%
Russia
9 publications, 0.54%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 9, 0.54%
United Kingdom
9 publications, 0.54%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 0.42%
Spain
7 publications, 0.42%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 6, 0.36%
Greece
6 publications, 0.36%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 6, 0.36%
Egypt
6 publications, 0.36%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 0.3%
Italy
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 5, 0.3%
Malaysia
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 4, 0.24%
Australia
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 4, 0.24%
Austria
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 0.24%
Ireland
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.24%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 0.24%
Singapore
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 4, 0.24%
Finland
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.18%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.18%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.12%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.12%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.12%
UAE
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.12%
Romania
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.12%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.06%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.06%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.06%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.06%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.06%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.06%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.06%
Norway
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.06%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.06%
Poland
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.06%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.06%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.06%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.06%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.06%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.06%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (15 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
USA
|
USA, 7, 23.33%
USA
7 publications, 23.33%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 4, 13.33%
Germany
4 publications, 13.33%
|
China
|
China, 4, 13.33%
China
4 publications, 13.33%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 13.33%
Netherlands
4 publications, 13.33%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 10%
Japan
3 publications, 10%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 3.33%
Belgium
1 publication, 3.33%
|
India
|
India, 1, 3.33%
India
1 publication, 3.33%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 3.33%
Iran
1 publication, 3.33%
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
1 profile journal article
Marla Deepak

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
66 publications,
601 citations
h-index: 13
1 profile journal article
Kompa Guenter

University of Kassel
89 publications,
1 233 citations
h-index: 13